where T = number of time series observations on returns; 4; (2,,~?~.
|
|
- Emily Knight
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Given the normality assumption, the null hypothesis in (3) can be tested using "Hotelling's T2 test," a multivariate generalization of the univariate t-test (e.g., see alinvaud (1980, page 230)). A brief derivation of the equivalent F test is included for completeness and as a means of introducing some notation that will be needed later. If we estimate the multivariate system of (1) using ordinary least squares for each individual equation, the estimated intercepts have a multivariate normal distribution, conditional on r,, (Vt = 1,..., T), with where T = number of time series observations on returns; 4; (2,,~?~. ~. 8, = ~,/s,; = sample mean of ;,?, and sj = sample varinance of $, wlthout an adjustment for degrees of freedom. Furthermore, 2, and H are independent with (T- 2)2 having a Wishart distribution with parameters (T- 2) and 2. These facts imply (see orrison (1976, page 131)) that (T(T- N - l)/n(t - 2))Wu has a noncentral F distribution with degrees of freedom N and (T- N - I), where and 2 = unbiased residual covariance matri~.~ (The corresponding statistic based on the maximum likelihood estimate of H will be denoted as W.) The noncentrality parameter, A, is given by Under the null hypothesis that a e uals zero, X = 0, and we have a central F 4 9. distribution. ore generally, the d~stnbution under the alternative provides a way to study the power of the test; more will be said about this in a later section. It is also interesting to note that under the null hypothesis the W, statistic has a central Fdistribution unconditionally, for the parameters of this central Fdo not depend on G, in any way. However, we do not know the unconditional distribution of 2, or W, under the alternate, for the conditional distribution depends on the sample values of i,, through 8;.
2 TABLE 1 A COPARlSON OF FOUR ASYPTOTICALLY EQUIVALENT TESTS OF EX ANTE EFFICIENCY OF A GIVEN PORTFOLIO. THE W STATISTIC IS DISTR~BUTEDAS A TRANSFOR OF A CENTRAL F DISTR~BUTIONIN FINITE SAPLES. THEWALDTEST, THE LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST (LRT), AND THE LAGRANGEULTIPLIER TEST (LT) ARE ONOTONE TRANSFORS OF W, AND EACH IS DISTRIBUTED AS CHI-SQUARE WITH N DEGREES OF FREEDO AS T APPROACHES INFINITY. P-Values Using P-Value Using Asymptotic Approximations Exact Distribution of W Wald LRT LT Note: N is the number of assets used together with portfolio p to construct the ex post frontier, and T is the number of time series observations.
3 ARTICLE IN PRESS J. Lewellen, S. Nagel / Journal of Financial Economics 82 (2006) Unconditional alphas and betas The conditional CAP says that stocks expected returns are proportional to their conditional betas: E t 1 [R it ] ¼ b t g t. Taking unconditional expectations implies that E[R it ] ¼ bg+cov(b t,g t ), as observed by Jagannathan and Wang (1996). An asset s unconditional alpha is defined as a u E[R it ] b u g, and substituting for E[R it ] yields: a u ¼ gðb b u Þþcovðb t ; g t Þ. (1) Under some conditions, discussed below, a stock s unconditional and expected conditional betas will be similar, in which case a u is approximately equal to the covariance between beta and the market risk premium. ore generally, Appendix A shows that b u ¼ b þ g s 2 covðb t ; g t Þþ 1 s 2 cov b t ; ðg t gþ 2 1 þ s 2 cov b t ; s 2 t. (2) This expression says that b u differs from the expected conditional beta if b t covaries with the market risk premium (second term), if it covaries with (g t g) 2 (third term), or if it covaries with the conditional volatility of the market (last term). Roughly speaking, movement in beta that is positively correlated with the market risk premium or with market volatility, g t or s 2 t, raises the unconditional covariance between R i and R (the other term is generally quite small, as we explain in a moment). Substituting (2) into (1), the stock s unconditional alpha is a u ¼ 1 g2 s 2 covðb t ; g t Þ g s 2 cov b t ; ðg t gþ 2 g s 2 cov b t ; s 2 t : (3)
4 2.3. agnitude Our goal is to understand whether a u in Eq. (3) might be large enough to explain observed anomalies. We begin with a few observations to simplify the general formula. Notice, first, that the market s squared Sharpe ratio, g 2 /s 2 in the first term, is very small for monthly returns: for example, using the Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP) value-weighted index from 1964 to 2001, g ¼ 7% and s ¼ 4.5%, so the squared Sharpe ratio is 11. Further, the quadratic (g t g) 2, in the second term, is also quite small for plausible parameter values: if g equals % and g t varies between, say, % and %, the quadratic is at most 05 2 ¼ Plugging a variable this small into the second term would have a negligible effect on alpha. These observations suggest the following approximation for a u : a u ¼ covðb t ; g t Þ g s 2 cov b t ; s 2 t. (4) Eq. (4) says that, when the conditional CAP holds, a stock s unconditional alpha depends primarily on how b t covaries with the market risk premium and with market volatility 3. To explore the magnitude of Eq. (4), it is useful to consider the simplest case when b t covaries only with the market risk premium: a u Ecov(b t,g t ) ¼ rs b s g, where s denotes a standard deviation and r is the correlation between b t and g t. Table 1 3 The approximation becomes perfect as the return interval shrinks because g 2 and (g t g) 2 go to zero more quickly than the other terms in Eq. (3). We thank John Campbell for this observation.
5 Table 3 Average conditional alphas, The table reports average conditional alphas for size, B/, and momentum portfolios (% monthly). Alphas are estimated quarterly using daily returns, semiannually using daily and weekly returns, and annually using monthly returns. The portfolios are formed from all NYSE and Amex stocks on CRSP/Compustat. We begin with 25 size- B/ portfolios (5 5 sort, breakpoints determined by NYSE quintiles) and ten return-sorted portfolios, all value weighted. Small is the average of the five low-market-cap portfolios, Big is the average of the five high-marketcap portfolios, and S B is their difference. Similarly, Grwth is the average of the five low-b/ portfolios, Value is the average of the five high-b/ portfolios, and V G is their difference. Return-sorted portfolios are formed based on past six-month returns. Losers is the bottom decile, Winrs is the top decile, and W L is their difference. Bold values denote estimates greater than two standard errors from zero. Size B/ omentum Small Big S B Grwth Value V G Losers Winrs W L Average conditional alpha (%) Quarterly Semiannual Semiannual Annual Standard error Quarterly Semiannual Semiannual Annual Quarterly and Semiannual 1 alphas are estimated from daily returns, Semiannual 2 alphas are estimated from weekly returns, and Annual alphas are estimated from monthly returns.
6 Figure 1. Population R 2 s for artificial factors. This figure explores how easy it is to find factors that explain, in population, the cross section of expected returns on Fama and French s 25 size-b/ portfolios. We randomly generate factors either factor loadings directly or zero-investment factor portfolios, as described in the figure and estimate the population R 2 when the size-b/ portfolios expected returns are regressed on their factor loadings. The average returns and covariance matrix of the portfolios, quarterly from , are treated as population parameters in the simulations. The plots are based on 5,000 draws of 1 to 5 factors. Panel A: Random draws of factor loadings. Loadings for the 25 size-b/ portfolios are drawn from a VN distribution with mean zero and covariance matrix proportional to the return covariance matrix. Cross-sectional R 2 Panel B: Random draws of factor portfolios. Zero-investment factors, formed from the size-b/ portfolios, are generated by randomly drawing a 25 1 vector of weights from a standard normal distribution. Cross-sectional R 2 Panel C: Random draws of zero-mean factor portfolios. Zero-investment factors, formed from the size-b/ portfolios, are generated by randomly drawing a 25 1 vector of weights from a standard normal distribution, but only factors with roughly zero expected returns are kept. Cross-sectional R 2
7 Figure 2: Sample distribution of the cross-sectional adj. R 2. This figure shows the sample distribution of the cross-sectional adj. R 2 (average returns regressed on estimated factor loadings) for Fama and French s 25 size-b/ portfolios from (quarterly returns). The plots use one to five randomly generated factors that together have the true R 2 reported on the x-axis. In the left-hand panels, the factors are combinations of the size-b/ portfolios (the weights are randomly drawn to produce the given R 2, as described in the text). In the right-hand panels, noise is added to the factors equal to 3/4 of a factor s total variance, to simulate factors that are not perfectly spanned by returns. The plots are based on 40,000 bootstrap simulations (10 sets of random factors; 4,000 simulations with each). 1 factor 1 factor, w/ noise Sample adj. R factors 3 factors, w/ noise Sample adj. R factors 5 factors, w/ noise Sample adj. R True R 2 True R 2
8 Figure 4. Population OLS and GLS R 2 s for artificial factors. This figure explores how easy it is to find factors that explain, in population, the cross section of expected returns on Fama and French s 25 size-b/ portfolios. We randomly generate factors either factor loadings directly or zero-investment factor portfolios, as noted and estimate the population OLS and GLS R 2 s when expected returns are regressed on factor loadings. The average returns and covariance matrix of the size-b/ portfolios, quarterly from , are treated as population parameters in the simulations. The plots are based on 5,000 draws of 1 to 5 factors. OLS R 2 GLS R 2 Panel A: Random draws of factor loadings. Loadings for the 25 size-b/ portfolios are drawn from a VN distribution with mean zero and covariance matrix proportional to the return covariance matrix. OLS R 2 GLS R 2 Panel B: Random draws of factor portfolios. Zero-investment factors, formed from the size-b/ portfolios, are generated by randomly drawing a 25 1 vector of weights from a standard normal distribution. OLS R 2 GLS R 2 Panel C: Random draws of zero-mean factor portfolios. Zero-investment factors, formed from the size-b/ portfolios, are generated by randomly drawing a 25 1 vector of weights from a standard normal distribution, but only factors with roughly zero expected returns are kept.
9 Prescription 4. If a proposed factor is a traded portfolio, include the factor as one of the test assets on the left-hand side of the cross-sectional regression. Prescription 4 builds on Prescription 2, in particular, the idea that the cross-sectional price of risk for a factor portfolio should be the factor s expected excess return. One simple way to build this restriction into a cross-sectional regression is to ask the factor to price itself; that is, to test whether the factor portfolio itself lies on the estimated cross-sectional regression line. Prescription 4 is most important when the cross-sectional regression is estimated with GLS rather than OLS. As mentioned above, when a factor portfolio is included as a left-hand side asset, GLS forces the regression to price the asset perfectly: the estimated slope on the factor s loading exactly equals the factor s average return in excess of the estimated zero-beta rate (in essence, the asset is given infinite weight in the regression). Thus, a GLS cross-sectional regression, when a traded factor is included as a test portfolio, is similar to the time-series approach of Black, Jensen, and Scholes (1972) and Gibbons, Ross, and Shanken (1989).
10 Table 1. Empirical tests of asset-pricing models, The table reports slopes, Shanken (1992b) t-statistics (in parentheses), and adj. R 2 s from cross-sectional regressions of average excess returns on estimated factor loadings for eight models proposed in the literature. Returns are quarterly (%). The test assets are Fama and French s 25 size-b/ portfolios used alone or together with their 30 industry portfolios. The cross-sectional T 2 (asymptotic χ 2 ) statistic tests whether residuals in the cross-sectional regression are all zero, as described in the text, with simulated p-values in brackets. T 2 is proportional to the distance, q, that a model s true mimicking portfolios are from the minimum-variance boundary, measured as the difference between the maximum generalized Sharpe ratio and that attainable from the mimicking portfolios; the sample estimate of q is reported in the final column. 95% confidence intervals for the true R 2 and q are reported in brackets below the sample values. The models are estimated from except Yogo s, for which we have factor data through odel and test assets Variables Adj. R 2 T 2 q Lettau & Ludvigson const. cay Δc cay Δc FF (2.28) (-1.25) (4) (2) [0, 0] [p=8] [0, 2] FF industry (3.29) (-1.23) (3) (-1.10) [0, 5] [p=0] [8, 8] Lustig & V Nieuwerburgh const. my Δc my Δc FF (2.22) (6) (4) (1.57) [5, 0] [p=7] [0, 8] FF industry (3.51) (3) (-9) (1.40) [0, 0] [p=4] [0, 6] Santos & Veronesi const. R s ω R FF (1.39) (-7) (-2.04) [5, 0] [p=3] [0, 8] FF industry (2.75) (-6) (-1.51) [0, 0] [p=1] [6, 0] Li, Vassalou, & Xing const. ΔI HH ΔI Corp ΔΙ Ncorp FF (2.13) (-9) (-3) (-1.96) [5, 0] [p=9] [0, 8] FF industry (3.14) (9) (-8) (-2.32) [0, 0] [p=1] [0, 4] Yogo const. Δc Ndur Δc Dur R FF (1.36) (0) (2.33) (9) [0, 0] [p=9] [0, 0] FF industry (2.27) (1) (1.52) (1) [0, 0] [p=6] [0, 8] CAP const. R FF (3.18) (-9) [0, 5] [p=0] [2, 8] FF industry (2.57) (9) [0, 5] [p=0] [8, 6]
11 Table 1, continued. odel and test assets Variables Adj. R 2 T 2 q Consumption CAP const. Δc FF (2.47) (9) [0, 0] [p=1] [6, 6] FF industry (3.51) (5) [0, 5] [p=0] [8, 2] Fama & French const. R SB HL FF (2.33) (-8) (1.70) (3.11) [0, 0] [p=0] [6, 2] FF industry (2.14) (-1) (1.24) (1.80) [0, 0] [p=0] [2, 0] Variables: R = CRSP value-weighted excess return Δc = log consumption growth cay = Lettau and Ludvigson s (2001) consumption-to-wealth ratio my = Lustig and Van Nieuwerburgh s (2004) housing collateral ratio (based on mortgage data) s ω = labor income to consumption ratio ΔI HH, ΔI Corp, ΔI Ncorp = log investment growth for households, non-financial corporations, and the non-corporate sector Δc Ndur, Δc Dur = Yogo s (2005) log consumption growth for non-durables and durables SB, HL = Fama and French s (1993) size and B/ factors
The Conditional CAPM Does Not Explain Asset- Pricing Anomalies. Jonathan Lewellen * Dartmouth College and NBER
The Conditional CAPM Does Not Explain Asset- Pricing Anomalies Jonathan Lewellen * Dartmouth College and NBER jon.lewellen@dartmouth.edu Stefan Nagel + Stanford University and NBER Nagel_Stefan@gsb.stanford.edu
More informationApplied Macro Finance
Master in Money and Finance Goethe University Frankfurt Week 2: Factor models and the cross-section of stock returns Fall 2012/2013 Please note the disclaimer on the last page Announcements Next week (30
More informationA Skeptical Appraisal of Asset-Pricing Tests
A Skeptical Appraisal of Asset-Pricing Tests Jonathan Lewellen Dartmouth and NBER jon.lewellen@dartmouth.edu Stefan Nagel Stanford and NBER nagel_stefan@gsb.stanford.edu Jay Shanken Emory and NBER jay_shanken@bus.emory.edu
More informationARTICLE IN PRESS. Journal of Financial Economics
Journal of Financial Economics 96 (21) 175 194 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Financial Economics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jfec A skeptical appraisal of asset pricing
More informationUniversity of California Berkeley
University of California Berkeley A Comment on The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns : The Statistical Significance of FVIX is Driven by a Single Outlier Robert M. Anderson Stephen W. Bianchi
More informationTime-Series Restrictions for the Cross-Section of Expected Returns: Evaluating Multifactor CCAPMs
Time-Series Restrictions for the Cross-Section of Expected Returns: Evaluating Multifactor CCAPMs Jinyong Kim Department of Economics New York University November 15, 2004 Abstract A number of recent papers
More informationNBER WORKING PAPER SERIES A REHABILITATION OF STOCHASTIC DISCOUNT FACTOR METHODOLOGY. John H. Cochrane
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES A REHABILIAION OF SOCHASIC DISCOUN FACOR MEHODOLOGY John H. Cochrane Working Paper 8533 http://www.nber.org/papers/w8533 NAIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts
More informationFinancial Econometrics Notes. Kevin Sheppard University of Oxford
Financial Econometrics Notes Kevin Sheppard University of Oxford Monday 15 th January, 2018 2 This version: 22:52, Monday 15 th January, 2018 2018 Kevin Sheppard ii Contents 1 Probability, Random Variables
More informationNote on The Cross-Section of Foreign Currency Risk Premia and Consumption Growth Risk
Note on The Cross-Section of Foreign Currency Risk Premia and Consumption Growth Risk Hanno Lustig and Adrien Verdelhan UCLA and Boston University June 2007 1 Introduction In our paper on The Cross-Section
More informationHedging Factor Risk Preliminary Version
Hedging Factor Risk Preliminary Version Bernard Herskovic, Alan Moreira, and Tyler Muir March 15, 2018 Abstract Standard risk factors can be hedged with minimal reduction in average return. This is true
More informationIntroduction to Asset Pricing: Overview, Motivation, Structure
Introduction to Asset Pricing: Overview, Motivation, Structure Lecture Notes Part H Zimmermann 1a Prof. Dr. Heinz Zimmermann Universität Basel WWZ Advanced Asset Pricing Spring 2016 2 Asset Pricing: Valuation
More informationTime-variation of CAPM betas across market volatility regimes for Book-to-market and Momentum portfolios
Time-variation of CAPM betas across market volatility regimes for Book-to-market and Momentum portfolios Azamat Abdymomunov James Morley Department of Economics Washington University in St. Louis October
More informationThe cross section of expected stock returns
The cross section of expected stock returns Jonathan Lewellen Dartmouth College and NBER This version: March 2013 First draft: October 2010 Tel: 603-646-8650; email: jon.lewellen@dartmouth.edu. I am grateful
More informationDissertation on. Linear Asset Pricing Models. Na Wang
Dissertation on Linear Asset Pricing Models by Na Wang A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved April 0 by the Graduate Supervisory
More informationDoes the Fama and French Five- Factor Model Work Well in Japan?*
International Review of Finance, 2017 18:1, 2018: pp. 137 146 DOI:10.1111/irfi.12126 Does the Fama and French Five- Factor Model Work Well in Japan?* KEIICHI KUBOTA AND HITOSHI TAKEHARA Graduate School
More informationThe Efficiency of the SDF and Beta Methods at Evaluating Multi-factor Asset-Pricing Models
The Efficiency of the SDF and Beta Methods at Evaluating Multi-factor Asset-Pricing Models Ian Garrett Stuart Hyde University of Manchester University of Manchester Martín Lozano Universidad del País Vasco
More informationMarket Timing Does Work: Evidence from the NYSE 1
Market Timing Does Work: Evidence from the NYSE 1 Devraj Basu Alexander Stremme Warwick Business School, University of Warwick November 2005 address for correspondence: Alexander Stremme Warwick Business
More informationProblem Set 6. I did this with figure; bar3(reshape(mean(rx),5,5) );ylabel( size ); xlabel( value ); mean mo return %
Business 35905 John H. Cochrane Problem Set 6 We re going to replicate and extend Fama and French s basic results, using earlier and extended data. Get the 25 Fama French portfolios and factors from the
More informationWhy Is Long-Horizon Equity Less Risky? A Duration-Based Explanation of the Value Premium
THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE VOL. LXII, NO. 1 FEBRUARY 2007 Why Is Long-Horizon Equity Less Risky? A Duration-Based Explanation of the Value Premium MARTIN LETTAU and JESSICA A. WACHTER ABSTRACT We propose a
More informationWhat is the Expected Return on a Stock?
What is the Expected Return on a Stock? Ian Martin Christian Wagner November, 2017 Martin & Wagner (LSE & CBS) What is the Expected Return on a Stock? November, 2017 1 / 38 What is the expected return
More informationFinancial Intermediaries and the Cross-Section of Asset Returns. Discussion
Financial Intermediaries and the Cross-Section of Asset Returns by Adrian, Etula, Muir Discussion Pietro Veronesi The University of Chicago Booth School of Business 1 What does this paper do? 1. From Broker-Dealer
More informationCAY Revisited: Can Optimal Scaling Resurrect the (C)CAPM?
WORKING PAPERS SERIES WP05-04 CAY Revisited: Can Optimal Scaling Resurrect the (C)CAPM? Devraj Basu and Alexander Stremme CAY Revisited: Can Optimal Scaling Resurrect the (C)CAPM? 1 Devraj Basu Alexander
More informationInternet Appendix for: Cyclical Dispersion in Expected Defaults
Internet Appendix for: Cyclical Dispersion in Expected Defaults March, 2018 Contents 1 1 Robustness Tests The results presented in the main text are robust to the definition of debt repayments, and the
More informationReevaluating the CCAPM
Reevaluating the CCAPM Charles Clarke January 2, 2017 Abstract This paper reevaluates the Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model s ability to price the cross-section of stocks. With a few adjustments
More informationThe Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Value Premium: A. Post-Financial Crisis Assessment
The Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Value Premium: A Post-Financial Crisis Assessment Garrett A. Castellani Mohammad R. Jahan-Parvar August 2010 Abstract We extend the study of Fama and French (2006)
More informationInternet Appendix to Interest rate risk and the cross section. of stock returns
Internet Appendix to Interest rate risk and the cross section of stock returns Abraham Lioui 1 Paulo Maio 2 This version: April 2014 1 EDHEC Business School. E-mail: abraham.lioui@edhec.edu. 2 Hanken School
More informationAddendum. Multifactor models and their consistency with the ICAPM
Addendum Multifactor models and their consistency with the ICAPM Paulo Maio 1 Pedro Santa-Clara This version: February 01 1 Hanken School of Economics. E-mail: paulofmaio@gmail.com. Nova School of Business
More informationUsing Stocks or Portfolios in Tests of Factor Models
Using Stocks or Portfolios in Tests of Factor Models Andrew Ang Columbia University and Blackrock and NBER Jun Liu UCSD Krista Schwarz University of Pennsylvania This Version: October 20, 2016 JEL Classification:
More informationEstimating time-varying risk prices with a multivariate GARCH model
Estimating time-varying risk prices with a multivariate GARCH model Chikashi TSUJI December 30, 2007 Abstract This paper examines the pricing of month-by-month time-varying risks on the Japanese stock
More informationDepartment of Finance Working Paper Series
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LEONARD N. STERN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS Department of Finance Working Paper Series FIN-03-005 Does Mutual Fund Performance Vary over the Business Cycle? Anthony W. Lynch, Jessica Wachter
More informationJennifer Conrad Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina
Basis Assets Dong-Hyun Ahn School of Economics, Seoul National University Jennifer Conrad Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina Robert F. Dittmar Stephen M. Ross School of Business,
More informationCross-Sectional Estimation Biases in Risk Premia and Zero-Beta
Technology and Investment, 03, 4, 54-66 Published Online February 03 (http://www.scip.org/journal/ti) Cross-Sectional Estimation Biases in isk Premia and Zero-Beta Excess eturns Jianhua Yuan, obert Savickas
More informationGDP, Share Prices, and Share Returns: Australian and New Zealand Evidence
Journal of Money, Investment and Banking ISSN 1450-288X Issue 5 (2008) EuroJournals Publishing, Inc. 2008 http://www.eurojournals.com/finance.htm GDP, Share Prices, and Share Returns: Australian and New
More informationAre the Fama-French Factors Proxying News Related to GDP Growth? The Australian Evidence
Are the Fama-French Factors Proxying News Related to GDP Growth? The Australian Evidence Annette Nguyen, Robert Faff and Philip Gharghori Department of Accounting and Finance, Monash University, VIC 3800,
More informationDoes Idiosyncratic Volatility Proxy for Risk Exposure?
Does Idiosyncratic Volatility Proxy for Risk Exposure? Zhanhui Chen Nanyang Technological University Ralitsa Petkova Purdue University We thank Geert Bekaert (editor), two anonymous referees, and seminar
More informationProperties of the estimated five-factor model
Informationin(andnotin)thetermstructure Appendix. Additional results Greg Duffee Johns Hopkins This draft: October 8, Properties of the estimated five-factor model No stationary term structure model is
More informationAsset Pricing Anomalies and Time-Varying Betas: A New Specification Test for Conditional Factor Models 1
Asset Pricing Anomalies and Time-Varying Betas: A New Specification Test for Conditional Factor Models 1 Devraj Basu Alexander Stremme Warwick Business School, University of Warwick January 2006 address
More informationInternet Appendix for: Cyclical Dispersion in Expected Defaults
Internet Appendix for: Cyclical Dispersion in Expected Defaults João F. Gomes Marco Grotteria Jessica Wachter August, 2017 Contents 1 Robustness Tests 2 1.1 Multivariable Forecasting of Macroeconomic Quantities............
More informationWashington University Fall Economics 487
Washington University Fall 2009 Department of Economics James Morley Economics 487 Project Proposal due Tuesday 11/10 Final Project due Wednesday 12/9 (by 5:00pm) (20% penalty per day if the project is
More informationThe Capital Asset Pricing Model in the 21st Century. Analytical, Empirical, and Behavioral Perspectives
The Capital Asset Pricing Model in the 21st Century Analytical, Empirical, and Behavioral Perspectives HAIM LEVY Hebrew University, Jerusalem CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Contents Preface page xi 1 Introduction
More informationAsset Pricing and Excess Returns over the Market Return
Supplemental material for Asset Pricing and Excess Returns over the Market Return Seung C. Ahn Arizona State University Alex R. Horenstein University of Miami This documents contains an additional figure
More informationThe Common Factor in Idiosyncratic Volatility:
The Common Factor in Idiosyncratic Volatility: Quantitative Asset Pricing Implications Bryan Kelly University of Chicago Booth School of Business (with Bernard Herskovic, Hanno Lustig, and Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh)
More informationMonetary Economics Measuring Asset Returns. Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015
Monetary Economics Measuring Asset Returns Gerald P. Dwyer Fall 2015 WSJ Readings Readings this lecture, Cuthbertson Ch. 9 Readings next lecture, Cuthbertson, Chs. 10 13 Measuring Asset Returns Outline
More informationTIME-VARYING CONDITIONAL SKEWNESS AND THE MARKET RISK PREMIUM
TIME-VARYING CONDITIONAL SKEWNESS AND THE MARKET RISK PREMIUM Campbell R. Harvey and Akhtar Siddique ABSTRACT Single factor asset pricing models face two major hurdles: the problematic time-series properties
More informationDoes Idiosyncratic Volatility Proxy for Risk Exposure?
Does Idiosyncratic Volatility Proxy for Risk Exposure? Zhanhui Chen Nanyang Technological University Ralitsa Petkova Purdue University We decompose aggregate market variance into an average correlation
More informationMonthly Holdings Data and the Selection of Superior Mutual Funds + Edwin J. Elton* Martin J. Gruber*
Monthly Holdings Data and the Selection of Superior Mutual Funds + Edwin J. Elton* (eelton@stern.nyu.edu) Martin J. Gruber* (mgruber@stern.nyu.edu) Christopher R. Blake** (cblake@fordham.edu) July 2, 2007
More informationFama-French in China: Size and Value Factors in Chinese Stock Returns
Fama-French in China: Size and Value Factors in Chinese Stock Returns November 26, 2016 Abstract We investigate the size and value factors in the cross-section of returns for the Chinese stock market.
More informationNBER WORKING PAPER SERIES MEASURING THE RISK-RETURN TRADEOFF WITH TIME-VARYING CONDITIONAL COVARIANCES. Esben Hedegaard Robert J.
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES MEASURING THE RISK-RETURN TRADEOFF WITH TIME-VARYING CONDITIONAL COVARIANCES Esben Hedegaard Robert J. Hodrick Working Paper 20245 http://www.nber.org/papers/w20245 NATIONAL BUREAU
More informationStatistical Understanding. of the Fama-French Factor model. Chua Yan Ru
i Statistical Understanding of the Fama-French Factor model Chua Yan Ru NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2012 ii Statistical Understanding of the Fama-French Factor model Chua Yan Ru (B.Sc National University
More informationDisentangling Beta and Value Premium Using Macroeconomic Risk Factors. WILLIAM ESPE and PRADOSH SIMLAI n
Business Economics Vol. 47, No. 2 r National Association for Business Economics Disentangling Beta and Value Premium Using Macroeconomic Risk Factors WILLIAM ESPE and PRADOSH SIMLAI n In this paper, we
More informationLecture 5. Predictability. Traditional Views of Market Efficiency ( )
Lecture 5 Predictability Traditional Views of Market Efficiency (1960-1970) CAPM is a good measure of risk Returns are close to unpredictable (a) Stock, bond and foreign exchange changes are not predictable
More informationCommon Risk Factors in the Cross-Section of Corporate Bond Returns
Common Risk Factors in the Cross-Section of Corporate Bond Returns Online Appendix Section A.1 discusses the results from orthogonalized risk characteristics. Section A.2 reports the results for the downside
More informationSeptember 12, 2006, version 1. 1 Data
September 12, 2006, version 1 1 Data The dependent variable is always the equity premium, i.e., the total rate of return on the stock market minus the prevailing short-term interest rate. Stock Prices:
More informationMultifactor models and their consistency with the ICAPM
Multifactor models and their consistency with the ICAPM Paulo Maio 1 Pedro Santa-Clara 2 This version: February 2012 3 1 Hanken School of Economics. E-mail: paulofmaio@gmail.com. 2 Nova School of Business
More informationAn Online Appendix of Technical Trading: A Trend Factor
An Online Appendix of Technical Trading: A Trend Factor In this online appendix, we provide a comparative static analysis of the theoretical model as well as further robustness checks on the trend factor.
More informationMULTI FACTOR PRICING MODEL: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO CAPM
MULTI FACTOR PRICING MODEL: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO CAPM Samit Majumdar Virginia Commonwealth University majumdars@vcu.edu Frank W. Bacon Longwood University baconfw@longwood.edu ABSTRACT: This study
More informationOn the economic significance of stock return predictability: Evidence from macroeconomic state variables
On the economic significance of stock return predictability: Evidence from macroeconomic state variables Huacheng Zhang * University of Arizona This draft: 8/31/2012 First draft: 2/28/2012 Abstract We
More informationEmpirical Tests of Asset Pricing Models with Individual Assets: Resolving the Errors-in-Variables Bias in Risk Premium Estimation
Empirical Tests of Asset Pricing Models with Individual Assets: Resolving the Errors-in-Variables Bias in Risk Premium Estimation by Narasimhan Jegadeesh, Joonki Noh, Kuntara Pukthuanthong, Richard Roll,
More informationTrading Costs of Asset Pricing Anomalies Appendix: Additional Empirical Results
Trading Costs of Asset Pricing Anomalies Appendix: Additional Empirical Results ANDREA FRAZZINI, RONEN ISRAEL, AND TOBIAS J. MOSKOWITZ This Appendix contains additional analysis and results. Table A1 reports
More informationSize and Book-to-Market Factors in Returns
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 5-2015 Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Returns Qian Gu Utah State University Follow this and additional
More informationThe stochastic discount factor and the CAPM
The stochastic discount factor and the CAPM Pierre Chaigneau pierre.chaigneau@hec.ca November 8, 2011 Can we price all assets by appropriately discounting their future cash flows? What determines the risk
More informationModels of Asset Pricing
appendix1 to chapter 5 Models of Asset Pricing In Chapter 4, we saw that the return on an asset (such as a bond) measures how much we gain from holding that asset. When we make a decision to buy an asset,
More informationMonotonicity in Asset Returns: New Tests with Applications to the Term Structure, the CAPM and Portfolio Sorts
Monotonicity in Asset Returns: New Tests with Applications to the Term Structure, the CAPM and Portfolio Sorts Andrew Patton and Allan Timmermann Oxford/Duke and UC-San Diego June 2009 Motivation Many
More informationThe diversification benefits of hedge funds and funds of hedge funds
The diversification benefits of hedge funds and funds of hedge funds Maher Kooli School of Business and Management, University of Quebec in Montreal (UQAM), CP 6192, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal Quebec,
More informationThe Financial Review The Epstein Zin Model with Liquidity Extension For Review Only
The Financial Review The Epstein Zin Model with Liquidity Extension Journal: The Financial Review Manuscript ID FIRE---.R Manuscript Type: Paper Submitted for Review Keywords: Liquidity risk, Consumption-based
More informationARCH Models and Financial Applications
Christian Gourieroux ARCH Models and Financial Applications With 26 Figures Springer Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The Development of ARCH Models 1 1.2 Book Content 4 2 Linear and Nonlinear Processes 5
More informationOn the Cross-Section of Conditionally Expected Stock Returns *
On the Cross-Section of Conditionally Expected Stock Returns * Hui Guo Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Robert Savickas George Washington University October 28, 2005 * We thank seminar participants at
More informationEconomic Fundamentals, Risk, and Momentum Profits
Economic Fundamentals, Risk, and Momentum Profits Laura X.L. Liu, Jerold B. Warner, and Lu Zhang September 2003 Abstract We study empirically the changes in economic fundamentals for firms with recent
More informationThe Global Price of Market Risk and Country Inflation
The Global Price of Market Risk and Country Inflation Devraj Basu, Cass Business School, City University London, d.basu@city.ac.uk Chi-Hsiou Hung, Durham Business School, University of Durham, d.c.hung@durham.ac.uk
More informationLecture 3: Factor models in modern portfolio choice
Lecture 3: Factor models in modern portfolio choice Prof. Massimo Guidolin Portfolio Management Spring 2016 Overview The inputs of portfolio problems Using the single index model Multi-index models Portfolio
More informationOnline Appendix for Overpriced Winners
Online Appendix for Overpriced Winners A Model: Who Gains and Who Loses When Divergence-of-Opinion is Resolved? In the baseline model, the pessimist s gain or loss is equal to her shorting demand times
More informationInterpreting the Value Effect Through the Q-theory: An Empirical Investigation 1
Interpreting the Value Effect Through the Q-theory: An Empirical Investigation 1 Yuhang Xing Rice University This version: July 25, 2006 1 I thank Andrew Ang, Geert Bekaert, John Donaldson, and Maria Vassalou
More informationThe Effect of Kurtosis on the Cross-Section of Stock Returns
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 5-2012 The Effect of Kurtosis on the Cross-Section of Stock Returns Abdullah Al Masud Utah State University
More informationJournal of Banking & Finance
Journal of Banking & Finance 35 (2011) 67 81 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Banking & Finance journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jbf Future labor income growth and the cross-section
More informationGMM Estimation. 1 Introduction. 2 Consumption-CAPM
GMM Estimation 1 Introduction Modern macroeconomic models are typically based on the intertemporal optimization and rational expectations. The Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) is an econometric framework
More informationExact factor pricing in a European framework. September 2000
Exact factor pricing in a European framework John Crombez, Rudi Vander Vennet Ghent University September 2000 The authors aknowledge helpful comments from Olivier Renault, Malcolm Baker, Jan Annaert, Maria
More informationOnline Appendix - Does Inventory Productivity Predict Future Stock Returns? A Retailing Industry Perspective
Online Appendix - Does Inventory Productivy Predict Future Stock Returns? A Retailing Industry Perspective In part A of this appendix, we test the robustness of our results on the distinctiveness of inventory
More informationExplaining the Poor Performance of Consumption-based Asset Pricing Models
THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE VOL. LV, NO. 6 DEC. 2000 Explaining the Poor Performance of Consumption-based Asset Pricing Models JOHN Y. CAMPBELL and JOHN H. COCHRANE* ABSTRACT We show that the external habit-formation
More informationWhy Is Long-Horizon Equity Less Risky? A Duration-Based Explanation of the Value Premium
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Finance Papers Wharton Faculty Research 2007 Why Is Long-Horizon Equity Less Risky? A Duration-Based Explanation of the Value Premium Martin Lettau Jessica A.
More informationQuantitative Measure. February Axioma Research Team
February 2018 How When It Comes to Momentum, Evaluate Don t Cramp My Style a Risk Model Quantitative Measure Risk model providers often commonly report the average value of the asset returns model. Some
More informationStatistical Models and Methods for Financial Markets
Tze Leung Lai/ Haipeng Xing Statistical Models and Methods for Financial Markets B 374756 4Q Springer Preface \ vii Part I Basic Statistical Methods and Financial Applications 1 Linear Regression Models
More informationFoundations of Finance
Lecture 5: CAPM. I. Reading II. Market Portfolio. III. CAPM World: Assumptions. IV. Portfolio Choice in a CAPM World. V. Individual Assets in a CAPM World. VI. Intuition for the SML (E[R p ] depending
More informationTesting Capital Asset Pricing Model on KSE Stocks Salman Ahmed Shaikh
Abstract Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is one of the first asset pricing models to be applied in security valuation. It has had its share of criticism, both empirical and theoretical; however, with
More informationProblem set 1 Answers: 0 ( )= [ 0 ( +1 )] = [ ( +1 )]
Problem set 1 Answers: 1. (a) The first order conditions are with 1+ 1so 0 ( ) [ 0 ( +1 )] [( +1 )] ( +1 ) Consumption follows a random walk. This is approximately true in many nonlinear models. Now we
More informationCHAPTER 8: INDEX MODELS
Chapter 8 - Index odels CHATER 8: INDEX ODELS ROBLE SETS 1. The advantage of the index model, compared to the arkowitz procedure, is the vastly reduced number of estimates required. In addition, the large
More informationThe four-factor asset pricing model on the Polish stock market
Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja ISSN: 1331-677X (Print) 1848-9664 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rero20 The four-factor asset pricing model on the Polish stock market
More informationInternet Appendix to The Booms and Busts of Beta Arbitrage
Internet Appendix to The Booms and Busts of Beta Arbitrage Table A1: Event Time CoBAR This table reports some basic statistics of CoBAR, the excess comovement among low beta stocks over the period 1970
More informationOPTIMAL RISKY PORTFOLIOS- ASSET ALLOCATIONS. BKM Ch 7
OPTIMAL RISKY PORTFOLIOS- ASSET ALLOCATIONS BKM Ch 7 ASSET ALLOCATION Idea from bank account to diversified portfolio Discussion principles are the same for any number of stocks A. bonds and stocks B.
More informationHow to measure mutual fund performance: economic versus statistical relevance
Accounting and Finance 44 (2004) 203 222 How to measure mutual fund performance: economic versus statistical relevance Blackwell Oxford, ACFI Accounting 0810-5391 AFAANZ, 44 2ORIGINAL R. Otten, UK D. Publishing,
More informationFactor Risk Premiums and Invested Capital: Calculations with Stochastic Discount Factors
Andrew Ang, Managing Director, BlackRock Inc., New York, NY Andrew.Ang@BlackRock.com Ked Hogan, Managing Director, BlackRock Inc., New York, NY Ked.Hogan@BlackRock.com Sara Shores, Managing Director, BlackRock
More informationAn Empirical Comparison of Non-traded and Traded Factors in Asset Pricing
An Empirical Comparison of Non-traded and Traded Factors in Asset Pricing Lei Jiang, Zhaoguo Zhan May 5, 23 Abstract In this paper, we argue that it is advisable to use traded factors rather than their
More informationPortfolio-Based Tests of Conditional Factor Models 1
Portfolio-Based Tests of Conditional Factor Models 1 Abhay Abhyankar Devraj Basu Alexander Stremme Warwick Business School, University of Warwick November 2002 Preliminary; please do not Quote or Distribute
More informationSpecial Report. The Carbon Risk Factor (EMI - Efficient Minus Intensive )
Special Report The Carbon Risk Factor (EMI - Efficient Minus Intensive ) JUNE 2015 Carbon Risk Factor (EMI) 1. Summary In the May s Special Report 01: The Emerging Importance of Carbon Emission-Intensities
More informationTHE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RISK AND EXPECTED RETURNS WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION
investigaciones económicas. vol. XXXIII (1), 2009, 69-96 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RISK AND EXPECTED RETURNS WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION GERMÁN LÓPEZ Universidad de Navarra JOAQUÍN MARHUENDA BELÉN NIETO
More informationLiquidity and IPO performance in the last decade
Liquidity and IPO performance in the last decade Saurav Roychoudhury Associate Professor School of Management and Leadership Capital University Abstract It is well documented by that if long run IPO underperformance
More informationUnderstanding defensive equity
Understanding defensive equity Robert Novy-Marx University of Rochester and NBER March, 2016 Abstract High volatility and high beta stocks tilt strongly to small, unprofitable, and growth firms. These
More informationAn Exact Test of the Improvement of the Minimum. Variance Portfolio 1
An Exact Test of the Improvement of the Minimum Variance Portfolio 1 Paskalis Glabadanidis 2 Business School Accounting and Finance University of Adelaide July 24, 2017 1 I would like to thank Ding Ding,
More informationConsumption- Savings, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Pricing
Finance 400 A. Penati - G. Pennacchi Consumption- Savings, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Pricing I. The Consumption - Portfolio Choice Problem We have studied the portfolio choice problem of an individual
More informationMimicking Portfolios and Weak Non-traded Factors in Two-pass Tests of. Asset Pricing. December 12, 2013
Mimicking Portfolios and Weak Non-traded Factors in Two-pass Tests of Asset Pricing December 12, 2013 Abstract We report that many non-traded macroeconomic factors are weakly correlated with asset returns,
More informationCAPM (1) where λ = E[r e m ], re i = r i r f and r e m = r m r f are the stock i and market excess returns.
II.3 Time Series, Cross-Section, and GMM/DF Approaches to CAPM Beta representation CAPM (1) E[r e i ] = β iλ, where λ = E[r e m ], re i = r i r f and r e m = r m r f are the stock i and market excess returns.
More information