HERE S WHAT THEY SAY:

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "HERE S WHAT THEY SAY:"

William Reeves
5 years ago
Views:

2 HERE S WHAT THEY SAY: in the Court of Justice of the European Union [2013] ICR 1116, Supreme Court ([2011] ICR 920), Court of Appeal ([2010] ICR 793) and EAT ([2009] ICR 703). Led by Thomas Linden QC, the issue in this case is whether a collective agreement reached after a TUPE transfer can bind the transferee. [2014] ICR 847, Court of Appeal ([2012] IRLR 685), and EAT ([2011] All ER (D) 250 Apr) concerning unfair dismissal, race discrimination and illegal employment contracts. Laura appeared for the Respondent at the Court of Appeal and Employment Appeal Tribunal. Laura was led by Thomas Linden Q.C. in the Supreme Court. in the Court of Appeal [2014] IRLR 211 and EAT [2013] IRLR 23. Disability discrimination case concerning the meaning of the concept of knowledge in discrimination claims. The Court of Appeal held that it was not open to an employer to blindly rely upon advice given to them by their occupational health team. Laura represented the Appellant in the EAT and was led by Karon Monaghan Q.C. at the Court of Appeal. in the Court of Appeal ([2012] EqLR 279) and EAT ([2011] EqLR 454). Laura was led by Helen Mountfield QC in the Court of Appeal in this disability discrimination case which involved consideration of whether the ability to work under time limited conditions amounted to a competence standard and reasonable adjustments. Laura also solely represented the Respondents before the EAT in this case which was the first case to come before the EAT about the meaning of a competence standard under s.14b DDA. [2015] ICR 1. Significant case clarifying the law as to whether an employee can bring a constructive dismissal claim when they are themselves in repudiatory breach of their contract of employment. The Employment Appeal Tribunal also considered whether or not an employer could rely on evidence obtained by searching through an employee s s and whether such a search would violate the employee s Article 8 rights. (Jobcentre plus) [2014] All ER (D) 54 (Sept). Trade Union Detriment, victimisation and applications to amend. UKEAT/0179/13/JOJ. Harassment on grounds of disability and continuing acts. 2

3 [2014] All ER (D) 12 (Sep) Professorial equal pay claim, the material factor defence. UKEAT/0108/12. Equal pay and the concept of a stable employment relationship. [2012] NLJR Decision concerning the procedure that Employment Tribunals should follow when considering whether to allow proceedings to be postponed on medical grounds. UKEATPA/1799/11. The case concerns the exercise of discretion to extend time in both unfair dismissal and discrimination claims and the need to hear evidence at PHRs. [2012] All ER (D) 215 (May). Case concerning the construction of s.12(1a) of the Race Relations Act. UKEAT/0469/12/RN. Perversity appeal concerning agreement for a minimum fixed term contract. UKEAT/0474/12/DM. Perversity appeal considering the application of Taylor v OCS. UKEAT/0385/12/RN. Constructive dismissal case considering issues of causation and compensation. UKEAT/0198/12/JOJ. Perversity appeal, consideration of whether dismissal was a reasonable sanction. UKEAT/0235/10/LA. Issues concerning assessment of the likelihood of promotion and assessment of pension loss. Laura's Employment Tribunal experience includes: Experience of multiple local government and NHS equal pay claims regularly appearing opposite Queen s Counsel and has acted for over 1000 claimants in one case. Extensive experience of complex TUPE matters. [2013] EqLR 924. Race and sex discrimination case concerning a failure to promotean academic from senior lecturer. Professorial equal pay claim. [2013] EqLR [2011] EqLR 429 Laura represented the Claimant in a 3 week equal pay claim in the Reading Employment Tribunal. The Claimant was a University Professor claiming like work with male professors employed at the University. This was a test case in respect of the issue of like work and also some elements of the genuine material factor defence. Laura has represented claimants at both the County Court and High Court in respect of Restraint of Trade clauses. [2013] EqLR 558. Laura was led by Aidan O Neil in this case which concerned reasonable adjustments required of bus companies in respect of their disabled passengers. 3

4 [2010] EWHC Laura was led by Hugh Tomlinson QC in this high profile case where they represented the defendants at the High Court. The BBC were seeking to prevent the defendant from revealing that he had played the role of the Stig in Top Gear. Chapter on Social Networking and the Global Workforce in (4th Edition), (Bloomberg BNA, 2014) Employment Law Practice Note for the Practical Law Company Laura has had the following articles published in the ELA Briefing:- Gutridge v Sodexo & North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Trust (September/October 2009) (the effect of TUPE transfers on equal pay claims) Firma Feryn (September/October 2008) (on discriminatory public statements by employers) Institutional Sexism in the Legal Profession, (2009) Laura has given seminars and lectured on the following topics:- The Equality Act - in particular, disability discrimination and equal pay Religious discrimination (for Lewis Silkin solicitors) Age discrimination Equal Pay Disability Discrimination Extra Territorial Effect/ Cross Border Employment Disputes TUPE Insolvency Redundancy ELAAS Employment Lawyers Association Employment Law Bar Association Free Representation Unit Bar Pro Bono Unit : Dean's List - which recognizes outstanding academic achievements of undergraduate students of excellence : Andrews Prize - For achieving one of the best five overall Intermediate/ Part I performances 4

5 : The Herbert Smith Prize for Exceptional Merit - for achieving the top result in the UCL public law exam. Bar Vocational Course, Inns of Court School of Law Very Competent: 11th out of approximately 650 candidates LLB Hons; University College London Degree: First Class SEEVIC College, Benfleet A Levels The Sweyne School, Rayleigh GCSE's 5

HERE S WHAT THEY SAY:

HERE S WHAT THEY SAY: in the Court of Justice of the European Union [2013] ICR 1116, Supreme Court ([2011] ICR 920), Court of Appeal ([2010] ICR 793) and EAT ([2009] ICR 703). Led by Thomas Linden QC,