Are Macroeconomic Variables Useful for Forecasting the Distribution of U.S. Inflation?
|
|
- Charlotte Lee
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Are Macroeconomic Variables Useful for Forecasting the Distribution of U.S. Inflation? Sebastiano Manzan a and Dawit Zerom b a Department of Economics & Finance, Baruch College, CUNY b California State University at Fullerton Abstract Much of the inflation forecasting literature examines the ability of macroeconomic indicators to accurately predict mean inflation. For the period after 1984, existing empirical evidence largely suggests that the likelihood of accurately predicting inflation using macroeconomic indicators is no better than a random walk model. We expand the scope of inflation predictability by exploring whether macroeconomic indicators are useful in predicting the distribution of inflation. We consider six commonly used macro indicators and core/non-core versions of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) deflator as measures of inflation. Based on monthly data and for the forecast period after 1984, we find that some of the macro indicators, such as unemployment rate, housing starts and term spread, provide significant out-of-sample predictability for the distribution of core inflation. The analysis of the quantiles of the predictive distribution reveals interesting patterns which otherwise would be ignored by existing inflation forecasting approaches that rely only on forecasting the mean. We also illustrate the importance of inflation distribution forecasting in evaluating some events of policy interest by focusing on predicting the likelihood of deflation. JEL Classification: C22, C53, E31, E52 Keywords: Distribution; Economic indicators; Inflation; Predictability; Quantiles. Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Barbara Rossi, seminar participants at Baruch College, Rutgers University, SNDE 2009 Symposium, the 2009 NBER Summer Institute, as well as three anonymous referees and the Editor for helpful comments that significantly improved the paper.
2 1 Introduction Forecasting the behavior of inflation plays a central role in the conduct of monetary policy due to the lagged impact of the central bank actions on economic activity. It is thus important to accurately predict the effect of the many shocks that hit the economy on the future dynamics of inflation. The standard approach for forecasting inflation has been the Phillips curve (PC) model that, in its expectation-augmented version, assumes a trade-off between unexpected inflation and unemployment, or more generally, indicators of real economic activity. Despite its long-time success, recent empirical evidence on the effectiveness of the PC model is far from unanimous. Stock and Watson (1999) provide a detailed study on the out-of-sample forecast accuracy of the PC by using an extensive set of macroeconomic variables. Using the forecast evaluation period January September 1996, their conclusion is that PC models have better forecasting performances (compared to univariate time series models) using the unemployment rate as well as other leading indicators of economic activity (e.g., output gap and capacity utilization). They also find that combining information or models might provide better results than simply relying on few indicators. However, Atkenson and Ohanian (2001) provide an opposite empirical evidence, albeit a different forecast evaluation period January November 1999, where they report that PC models are no better than the naïve model, which assumes that the expected inflation over the next 12 months is equal to inflation over the previous 12 months. Fisher et al. (2002) conduct a systematic comparison of the forecasting accuracy at the one-year horizon in different sub-periods and find that the PC forecasts outperformed the naiïve forecasts only in the window. There is evidence that the declining predictive power of macroeconomic indicators is a characteristic also of other variables (see D Agostino et al., 2006, and Rossi and Sekhposyan, 2010). For a comprehensive survey as well as discussion of the outstanding issues in inflation forecasting, see Stock and Watson (2008). In this paper, departing from the existing focus on conditional mean forecasting, we explore whether leading indicators of economic activity are useful in predicting the distribution of future inflation. Despite the availability of extensive literature on inflation forecasting, little or no attention has been paid to examining whether indicators of economic activity carry useful information about the dynamics of higher moments, beyond the mean. For example, having some idea on the conditional second-order moment of future inflation can be vital in assessing the risk to inflation stability due to macroeconomic shocks. Greenspan (2004) discusses this issue in the following terms: Given our inevitably incomplete knowledge about key structural aspects of an ever-changing economy and the sometimes asymmetric costs or benefits of particular outcomes, a central bank needs to consider 2
3 not only the most likely future path for the economy, but also the distribution of possible outcomes about that path. The decision-makers then need to reach a judgment about the probabilities, costs, and benefits of the various possible outcomes under alternative choices for policy (p. 37). While average future inflation may signal the direction of the economy, it cannot help policymakers to evaluate the risks of deviations from the most likely path and the cost for the economy of such deviations. In a recent paper, Kilian and Manganelli (2008) introduce a model in which the monetary policy maker is viewed as a risk manager trying to balance the risks to inflation and output stability. In this framework, if the preferences of the policy maker are assumed to be quadratic and symmetric, then the only relevant moment (of the inflation and output distributions) is the conditional mean. However, they provide evidence of departure of the preferences from such a benchmark. All the above elements point to the suggestion that forecasting the distribution of inflation represents a relevant tool in the conduct of monetary policy. In fact, the Bank of England has been publishing for many years the so-called fan charts that represent the subjective forecasts of the Bank about the future distribution of inflation. We use linear quantile regression to incorporate macroeconomic variables into the prediction of the conditional distribution of future inflation. The approach considers several conditional quantiles of future inflation, and by doing so, offers more flexibility (than, for example, the conventional PC models) in capturing the possible role of macroeconomic indicators in predicting the different parts of the inflation distribution. For instance, one may be able to investigate if some periods of low or high inflation are driven by some macroeconomic indicators. Surely such information cannot be delivered by PC-type models that deal only with predicting average inflation. We find strong empirical evidence of predictability for U.S. core monthly inflation using indicators of economic activity, in particular the unemployment rate and housing starts. Importantly, the empirical findings apply to a forecast evaluation period that is intentionally chosen to be post 1984, when the existing literature shows that macroeconomic indicators are not relevant to predict future average inflation (see Stock and Watson, 2007). We attribute this result to the ability of our approach to account for the varying predictive effect of economic indicators on core inflation at different quantiles of its distribution. For some indicator variables, we also find an asymmetric effect in the sense that an indicator is more relevant on the lower part of the forecasting distribution than the upper part (and vice versa, depending on the indicator considered). These observed quantile effects take place far away from the center of the distribution, making them difficult to be detected with approaches (like PC-type models) that solely focus on evaluating the relevance of these variables in predicting the conditional mean. 3
4 A possible explanation for these findings is that the public might form inflation expectations that are more responsive to macroeconomic news when inflation is in the tails of the distribution. This can happen if the monetary policy-maker has an (implicit or explicit) target located near the center of the distribution. When inflation fluctuates around the center of the distribution, expectations are well-anchored to the target in the sense that the public believes the central banks will be able to maintain price stability. However, when inflation deviates significantly from the target the public might distrust the ability of monetary policy to bring inflation back to the target and thus form expectations that rely more on macroeconomic variables which represent more reliable indicators of future inflation. This paper is related to an increasing number of papers that deal with distributional aspects of inflation. Cogley et al. (2005) propose a Bayesian VAR model where both the conditional mean and variance are time varying. They forecast inflation for the UK and illustrate their method by comparing interval forecasts from their model to the fan charts of the Bank of England. More recently, Clark (2011) considers a Bayesian VAR with stochastic volatility and finds that accounting for time variation in volatility is essential in producing accurate density forecasts for a a wide range of macroeconomic variables, in particular in the post-1985 sample period. A similar conclusion has also been reached by Jore et al. (2010) using AR and VAR models that allow for structural breaks. Compared to these papers, the quantile regression approach adopted in this paper models directly the possible changes in the inflation distribution and explains these changes on the economic indicators. Robertson et al. (2005) forecast the distribution of inflation based on a VAR specification and propose a methodology to twist the forecasting distribution in order to incorporate theoretical restrictions (e.g., a Taylor rule). Corradi and Swanson (2006) evaluate the performance of time series and PC models in forecasting one-month ahead inflation using different distributional assumptions for the error term, and Amisano and Giacomini (2007) use a Markov Switching model and find that the one-month ahead inflation forecasts from the nonlinear specification are more accurate compared to a linear one. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section (2) we discuss econometric approaches, including our proposal, to estimate the conditional forecast distribution of future inflation. Section (3) outlines a test of predictive accuracy that is used to evaluate the conditional distribution models discussed in Section (2). In Section (4), we present (with discussion) the empirical findings of the paper. Finally, Section (5) concludes. 4
5 2 Econometric methodology We denote the annualized inflation over a h-month period by Y h t = (1200/h)[log P t log P t h ] and the one-month annualized inflation by Y t = 1200[log P t log P t 1 ] where P t is the level of the price index in month t. Also let X t be some indicator of real economic activity such as unemployment rate. A baseline specification often used in forecasting inflation is the Phillips curve (PC) model. The PC model (see Stock and Watson, 1999) postulates that changes in h-month inflation, Y h t+h, depend on recent changes in one-month inflation and past and present values of a candidate economic indicator, Y h t+h Y t = µ h 0 + β h (L) Y t + γ h (L)X t + U pc t+h (1) where µ h 0 is a constant, βh (L) and γ h (L) are lag polynomials written in terms of the lag operator L and U pc t+h is the error term. Note that in the above specification we follow Stock and Watson (2007) and assume that the inflation rate Y t has a unit root, although other papers take the opposite view and consider inflation stationary (e.g., Ang et al., 2006). In evaluating the forecasting performance of the PC model, it is often compared against two univariate models: the autoregressive (AR) model and the naïve (random walk) model. Although simple, these two time series models are very competitive benchmarks. The AR model is a special case of the PC model where no information on present and past values of X t are included, i.e., where U ar t+h Y h t+h Y t = µ h 0 + β h (L) Y t + U ar t+h (2) is the error term. The naïve model (see Atkenson and Ohanian, 2001) specifies that the expected inflation over the next h months is equal to inflation over the previous h months, i.e., where U ao t+h model. Y h t+h = Y h t + U ao t+h (3) is the error term. In the rest of the paper we will refer to the naïve model by AO 2.1 Proposed approach Note that in the PC model the economic indicator is assumed to affect the inflation rate only through the conditional mean, which implies that its error U pc t+h should be independent of the past and present values of X t (and lags of Y t ). In other words, the effect (if any) of the macroeconomic 5
6 variable on the conditional distribution of future inflation (Yt+h h ) is only limited to the conditional mean. So the PC approach ignores the possibility for economic indicators to carry useful information about the dynamics of higher moments, and hence help improve the accuracy of the forecast distribution of inflation. To circumvent this limitation of PC models, we focus instead on the forecast distribution of Yt+h h conditional on the available information set at time t. Because existing empirical evidence (for the period after 1984) largely suggests that the likelihood of accurately predicting inflation using economic indicators is no better than a random walk model, we constrain the conditional mean of the forecast distribution of Yt+h h to follow the AO model (see Equation 3). Let the past and present values of a particular economic indicator variable, X, be denoted by the vector X t = (X t,,x t q+1 ). Use of the AO model implies that X t does not carry any relevant information for predicting the mean future inflation. However, unlike the AO model, we allow X t to have an effect on higher-order moments of Y h t+h and, more generally, on the conditional distribution of Yt+h h, which is not permitted in the PC model. Under the proposed set-up, if we find (relative) predictability in the conditional distribution of Y h t+h using X t while no (relative) predictability by the PC model compared to the benchmark AO model, we can then conclude that the predictability is occurring at parts of the distribution beyond the conditional mean. The proposed approach is denoted by AO-U X where the conditional mean of Yt+h h follows the AO model and X t is used to model the conditional quantile of the AO forecast error, Ut+h ao, which can be considered stationary. We should note that the direct nature of our forecasts introduces overlapping observations in Ut+h ao which can be assumed to follow a MA(h 1) process. This serial correlation may impact the accuracy of the estimated conditional quantiles 1 and we thus decided to carry out the conditional quantile step using the residuals (denoted by Ũao t+h ) from a fitted MA(h 1) model on Ut+h ao. Denote the α (0, 1) conditional quantile of Uao t+h and Ũao t+h conditional on the available information set at time t by Q t+h t (α) and Q t+h t (α), respectively. We estimate Q t+h t (α) using the quantile regression model (see Koenker and Bassett, 1978), Q t+h t (α) = δ 0,α + q δ k,α X t k+1. (4) k=1 Although the local effect of X t k+1 on the α-quantile is assumed to be linear, the model is very flexible because each slope coefficient δ k,α is allowed to differ across quantiles. This is a useful 1 Since quantiles are affected by the variance, the MA(h 1) structure has the potential to bias the quantile forecasts, especially for large h. To the best of our knowledge, there are no methods available that deal with MA errors in a quantile regression framework. 6
7 property since it provides guidance as to where in the distribution of Y h t+h the indicator X t has a significant effect. Finally, we construct the desired conditional distribution (or density) of Yt+h h from the conditional quantile estimates ˆQ t+h t (α) where the latter is obtained by taking the product of ˆ Qt+h t (α) in Equation (4) and the standard deviation of the fitted MA model (see above). In our implementation the sequence α is chosen to be between 0.05 and 0.95 in 0.01 interval. Further, to guarantee monotonicity of the conditional quantile estimates, and hence validity of the implied conditional distribution, we apply the proposal of Chernozhukov et al. (2010) which consists of rearranging the (possibly crossing) ˆQ t+h t (α) into a monotonic rearranged quantile curve. 3 Measuring relative predictability Suppose we have a pair of models (k and j) where we consider model k as the benchmark. We are interested in measuring the relative accuracy of model j when h-step ahead out-of-sample density or quantile forecasts are available. As benchmark, we consider two univariate models, i.e., the AR model (see Equation 2) and the AO model (see Equation 3) 2. The accuracies of the two benchmark (univariate) models are compared separately against two alternative models that incorporate the effect of macroeconomic indicators. For the latter, we consider the PC model (see Equation 1) and the proposed AO-U X model. We adopt a rolling window scheme when generating out-ofsample density or quantile forecasts from the various models. The first forecast is for January 1985 and the models are estimated on the window 1959:1-1984:1 and 1959:1-1984:7 for h=12 and 6, respectively. It should be noted that the forecast evaluation period is chosen intentionally to be post 1984 where current research shows that macroeconomic indicators do not add much to the predictability of mean inflation. The next forecast is for February 1985 and the estimation window is kept constant by dropping one observation at the beginning of the sample. For example, the estimation window is updated to (1959:2-1984:2) for h=12. We do this until forecasts for December 2007 are computed 3. In this manner, we collect a total of n=276 density or quantile forecasts for each model. 2 To ensure consistency, we estimate their forecast densities and quantile forecasts in a similar fashion as that of AO-U X model, except that the quantile regression in (4) is based on regressing errors Ũao t+h or Ũar t+h only on a constant (hence their respective error distribution is assumed to be independent of economic indicators). Similarly for the PC model. 3 For the AR and PC models, we select the lag order for Y t using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), recursively for each rolling window sample. For both the PC model and the proposed AO-U X model, we find that including lags of X t does not provide forecast improvements over the no lag case. So all results in next section are based on conditioning on current values of economic indicators, i.e. X t. 7
8 We use scoring rules to compare the pair of density or quantile forecasts. A scoring rule is a loss function whose arguments are the density/quantile forecast and the realization of the future observation. In this paper, we consider two such score functions: the Logarithmic Score (LS) function and the Weighted Quantile Score (WQS) function. Let ˆf j t+h t ( ) denotes the forecast density of Yt+h h conditional on the available information set at time t obtained from model j. The LS function is defined as LS j t+h t = log ˆf j t+h t (Y t+h h ). Instead, the WQS is defined from quantile forecasts and hence allows the forecaster to compare the performance of competing models on specific areas of the forecast distribution. Let ˆQ j t+h t (α) denote the α-quantile forecast of Y h t+h conditional on the available information set at time t obtained from model j. Instead, the WQS function (Gneiting and Raftery, 2007, and Gneiting and Ranjan, 2011) is given by WQS j t+h t = 1 0 QSj t+h t (α)ω(α)dα4, where QS j t+h t (α) = [ ˆQ j t+h t (α) Y t+h h ][1(Y t+h h ˆQ j t+h t (α)) α] is the quantile loss and 1( ) denotes the indicator function. Four weight functions are of interest, (1) ω(α) = 1 which is a uniform weight and provides an overall evaluation of the forecast distribution (can be viewed as a direct alternative to the LS), (2) ω(α) = α(1 α) which concentrates the weight in the middle of the distribution, (3) ω(α) = (1 α) 2 that assigns more weight to the left tail of the distribution, and (4) ω(α) = α 2 that puts more weight to the right tail. The latter two weights help us examine possible asymmetry in the predictive power of an economic indicator X. In order to put the contribution of the paper in the context of existing empirical evidence on U.S. inflation forecasting, we also evaluate the models in terms of their accuracy for predicting the conditional mean. We denote the score function by SS and is defined as the square of the forecast error, i.e. SS j t+h t = (ǫj t+h )2. For example, when j=ao model, the forecast error is simply U ao t+h. Now, given two competing models (k and j) where model k is considered the benchmark (AR or AO) and model j is the alternative model (PC or AO-U X), model j is said to be relatively more accurate in terms of a particular metric S {LS, WQS-unif, WQS-center, WQS-left, WQS-right, SS} if its average score S j n = 1 S j n t+h t t is higher than that of model k, S k n. Note that in our rolling setting, t (1984 : : 6) for h=6 and t (1984 : : 12) for h=12. We consider the approach proposed in Giacomini and White (2006) and Amisano and Giacomini (2007) to evaluate the hypothesis of equal forecast 4 In implementation, we replace this by a discrete version i=1 ω(αi)qsj t+h t (αi) where αi [0.05, 0.95] in 0.01 interval. 8
9 accuracy based on the test statistics t n (S) = n Sk n S j n ˆσ n (5) where ˆσ n is a heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent (HAC) standard error estimator of the difference in scores S k t+h t Sj t+h t. Assuming suitable regularity conditions, the statistic t n(s) is asymptotically standard normal under the null hypothesis of vanishing expected score differentials. In the case of rejection, model j is preferred if t n (S) is negative and model k is preferred if t n (S) is positive. 4 U.S. inflation forecasts We use four measures of the monthly price index (P t ): Consumer Price Index for all items (CPI), CPI excluding food and energy (core-cpi), Personal Consumption Expenditure deflator (PCE), and the PCE excluding food and energy (core-pce). We follow the recent inflation forecasting literature (see Stock and Watson, 1999, and Ang et al., 2006) and include six of the indicators of economic activity that are often considered as predictors of inflation, i.e., the civilian unemployment rate (UNEM), the index of industrial production (IP), real personal consumption expenditure (INC), employees on non-farm payrolls (WORK), housing starts (HS), and the term spread (SPREAD) defined as the yield on the 5-year Treasury bond minus the 3-month Treasury bill. Thus, we have X {UNEM, IP, WORK, HS, INC, SPREAD}. All the data (on P t and X t ) were gathered from the Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis database FRED and the sample period spans from January 1959 until December Some of the leading indicators (i.e., IP, INC, and WORK) are not stationary. We thus consider these variables in gap form where the long-run trend is modeled using a Hodrick and Prescott (1997) filter (HP) with parameter equal to (typically used for monthly data) 6. The trend is estimated only on information available at the time the forecast is made. 4.1 Summary of t n (S) test results Results for h = 6 and h = 12 are given in Tables (1) and (2), respectively. For both h, the PC model is either significantly worse or no better than the AO model in terms of conditional mean predictive accuracy for all X and all inflation measures. In fact, for h = 12, all t n (SS) values 5 The macroeconomic series consists of revised data available at the January 2008 vintage due to the lack of a comprehensive real-time dataset at the monthly frequency. 6 We also considered a quadratic trend as in Ang et al. (2006) and the results are very similar to the HP filter. To conserve space we decided to report only the results of the HP filter. 9
10 are positive and the majority are also significant. This evidence confirms earlier results in the literature (e.g., Atkenson and Ohanian, 2001) of the difficulty of outperforming the random walk benchmark based on Phillips-curve models in the post-1984 period. The tests of relative accuracy of density/quantile forecasts of the PC models against the AO naïve model lead, in most cases, to the same conclusion reached above for the comparison of the mean forecasts. This is not surprising since the models differ in their conditional mean specification and thus evaluating their mean or distribution forecasts is very likely to lead to similar outcomes. It should be noted that no t n (SS) values are reported for AO - U X as its conditional mean forecast is the same as AO model by construction. The comparison of the density/quantile forecasts of the AO-U X models against the AO benchmark results in several significant rejections (negative t n (S) that are shown in bold) for the core measures of inflation, but only in few cases for PCE and CPI at both h = 6 and h = 12. The WQS tests show that the most benefit from including the macroeconomic indicators occurs on the left tail of the forecast distribution of inflation (see t n (WQS-left)). Although mainly limited to coreinflation, UNEM, HS and SPREAD indicators also show improvement over the AO model (see t n (WQS-center)) for predicting the middle part of the forecast distribution of inflation. For example, considering core-pce (for both h), the SPREAD indicator adds forecast improvement over AO model at all parts of the forecast distribution. Notice that even for the headline inflation measures, most of the economic indicators lead to better quantile forecasts (where t n (S) is negative), although the improvements are not statistically significant. 4.2 Is there episodic predictability? The relative forecast performance results reported in Table (1) and (2) are based on test statistics that average (aggregate) performances over a period of 23 years (1985:1-2007:12). It is possible that the tests may have overlooked differences in performance between models that occur at certain times during the forecast period. Here, we investigate the possibility of episodic predictability in the sense that economic indicators might provide more accurate forecasts only during certain times of the forecasting period. To do so, we conduct a fluctuation test that evaluates the (relative) performance of two competing forecast models and signals whether one of the forecasts is significantly (given appropriate critical values) more accurate at any point in time. Using similar notations as in Section 10
11 (3) and for a window size m, we define average score for model j at time t and for h = 12 by S j t = 1 m t+m/2 i=t m/2 S j i+h i, t (1990 : : 12) In this application we set m equal to 120 such that the average score for each t is based on a two-sided rolling window of 10 years. We follow Giacomini and Rossi (2010) and test the equal forecast performance of model k and j based on the test statistics F t (S) = m Sk t S j t ˆσ t (6) where ˆσ t is a heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent (HAC) standard error estimator of the difference in scores S k i+h i Sj i+h i. The asymptotic distribution of F t(s) under the null hypothesis of equal performance is non standard. Critical values for various µ = m/n and two significance levels are provided in Giacomini and Rossi (2010). In our case, we have n = 276 and m = 120 resulting in µ Rejection occur at the 5% (10%) level against a two-sided alternative when max t F t (S) > (2.626), while the one-sided critical value is ±2.624 (±2.334). Note that the time variation of F t (S) also contains valuable information. Model j is more accurate at time t if F t (S) crosses the lower bound at time t and model k is more accurate F t (S) crosses the upper bound. To save space, we consider only the score function S = LS that compares density forecasts of the AO-U X model (j) against the AO model (k). The results for CPI and PCE are given in Figure (1) and those for core-cpi and core-pce are shown in Figure (2). Focusing on Figure (1a) which corresponds to CPI, observe that there is evidence of predictability by most economic indicators (F t (LS) takes a negative value) in the period , although none is statistically significant at conventional levels. Note that for INC GAP and HS, F t (LS) is negative (although not significant) during most part of For PCE (see Figure 1b), the pattern of the F t (LS) is similar to CPI with better predictability (compared to the AO model) after 1997 for most economic indicators. The best performance is achieved by HS for which F t (LS) is negative and significant at 10% in the periods and between mid-1995 and Figure (2a) gives the time path of F t (LS) of core-cpi. The fluctuation test for core-cpi shows a much better performance of the AO-U X compared to the case of CPI inflation, especially before Comparing Figure (2a) with Figure (1a), the most striking difference is observed for UNEM and HS where these economic indicators become relevant in forecasting core-cpi but are irrelevant to forecast CPI. Notice from Figure (2a) that the F t (LS) for both UNEM and HS are always 11
12 negative throughout the forecast period. Figure (2b) shows the time path of F t (LS) of core-pce. This measure of inflation is the one with the most evidence of predictability in the sense that all the economic indicators contribute to outperform the benchmark throughout the forecast period (F t (LS) is negative). Notice that HS provides significant predictability throughout the forecast period. In summary, there is ample evidence of predictability for all versions of inflation, although the evidence is stronger for the core versions of inflation, i.e. core-cpi and core-pce. In particular, the core-pce measure of inflation shows the most significant evidence of predictability notably when using UNEM and HS as predictors. The fluctuation test is a useful tool in uncovering relevant predictability information that is overlooked by t n (LS) test. Relying only on the t n (LS) test gives the impression that all the considered economic indicators are uninformative in predicting CPI and PCE versions of inflation. But the more detailed predictability picture provided by the fluctuation test shows that many of the indicators are indeed relevant, although higher performance seem to be overwhelmed by periods of poor performance which, on aggregate, results in statistically insignificant t n (LS) values. 4.3 Distribution forecasts of inflation In this paper we ask the question: are macroeconomic variables useful in forecasting the distribution (beyond the mean) of U.S. inflation in the post 1984 period? Several relative accuracy tests of density/quantile forecasts confirm that some economic indicators provide significant predictability of the distribution of inflation for large part of the post 1984 period. Further, most of the evidence of predictability occurs at the left tail of the inflation forecast distribution. To offer more insights on these results, we examine selected quantiles (α=5%, 50% and 95%) of the forecast distribution of inflation by focusing on core-pce which shows the most predictability. We summarize results for UNEM and HS indicators and focus on h = 12. Unemployment rate (UNEM) In the top portion of Figure (3), we display the quantile (at 5%, 50% and 95% ) forecasts of core- PCE for the period 1985:1-2007:12 based on the benchmark AO model (shown with broken lines) and the AO-U X (shown with solid lines) where X=UNEM. In the lower panel, we present the time series plot of UNEM. Note that it is shifted forward by 12 months so that it becomes aligned with the target date. For example, the UNEM value in January 1985 actually refers to that of 12
13 January 1984 which represents the value of UNEM used to produce the distribution forecasts for the target date (January 1985). Until about 1995, no noticeable differences are observed in the quantile forecasts of the two models. But, after 1995, the forecast distribution from AO-U X model shifts upward from the the AO model and the most gap between the quantile forecasts occurs at the 5% quantile level. Although not shown in the plot, large gaps also occur at other tail quantile levels. This observation may be attributed to the upward pressure on inflation derived from the persistent decrease in the unemployment rate in the late 1990 s as observed from the time series plot of UNEM (see the lower portion of Figure 3). In the late 1990 s and early 2000 unemployment was at historically low levels approaching 4%. Consistent with the existence of a trade-off between unemployment and inflation rates, the low unemployment rate shifted the whole forecast distribution of inflation to higher levels (compared to the AO model distribution forecasts), with a much larger shift at the lower tail quantile of the distribution. In addition, there appear to be a tendency for the forecast distributions of core PCE to gradually become narrower toward the end of the sample. This characteristic is common to both forecasting methods and can be attributed to the decline in inflation volatility captured by the rolling window estimation (see Jore et al., 2010, and Clark, 2011, for similar findings). By comparing the AO and AO-U X models both estimated on a rolling window we account for the post-1984 decline in inflation volatility, but we are also able to show that macroeconomic variables introduce additional time-variation in the quantile forecasts which, as the previous Section has shown, delivers more accurate forecasts compared to the AO model. Housing Starts (HS) Figure (4) displays quantile (5%, 50% and 95%) forecasts of core-pce for the period 1985:1-2007:12 from the AO model (shown with broken lines) and the AO-U X (shown with solid lines) where X=HS. Before 1995, the quantile forecasts (at both 50% and 5% levels) of the AO-U X closely track those of the AO model. On the other hand, the two quantile forecasts at the 95% level appear to differ appreciably. Although not shown, quantile forecasts at other right tail quantile levels behave similarly. This observation may be due to the strongest downward pressure on high levels of inflation resulting from the slow and steady decrease in housing starts (from mid-1980 s to beginning of 1990) as noticed from the time plot of HS (see the lower portion of Figure 4). Between 1995 and 1998, both models generate quantile forecasts that are closely comparable. After 1998, quantile forecasts start to diverge again while the most gap between the quantile forecasts 13
14 at the 5% quantile level. Notice from the time plot of HS (shown in the lower portion of Figure 4) that the slow and steady increase in housing starts (from 2001 to 2007) exerts an upward pressure on the whole distribution of inflation, with pressure seems to be more pronounced at the lower tail quantile. 4.4 Probability of deflation In the beginning of 1998 a debate started on the possibility of the U.S. economy entering a period of deflation that was also the topic of a speech given by the Federal Reserve Board Chairman on January 3rd, 1998 (see Greenspan, 1998). Using this historical fact as a motivation, we present a complementary (to relative density/quantile forecast evaluation tests) approach to assess forecast distributions of inflation by focusing on the accuracy of the methods in predicting the likelihood of deflation (negative inflation). We provide a brief illustration using core-pce and the unemployment rate with focus on h = 12. In Figure (5) we display probability of deflation for the period 1996:7-2007:12 as predicted by the benchmark AO model and AO-U X model where X=UNEM. From the Figure it can be observed that a forecaster using the AO model would have predicted the probability of deflation to be larger than 5% for several months over the years with the highest probability reaching 18.2% for the June 1999 target date. In contrast, for the same June 1999, AO- U X would have predicted only a 1.18% chance of deflation. Overall, the use of the unemployment rate leads to a likelihood of deflation close to zero throughout the 1996:7-2007:12 period, and thus appears to provide a more appropriate prediction of the event. 5 Conclusion Forecasting the behavior of inflation plays a central role in economic policy-making due to the inherently forward-looking nature of economic decisions. Typically, inflation forecasting focuses on modeling the conditional mean or the most likely outcome. While relevant, relying only on the dynamics of the conditional mean leaves out other interesting aspects of the inflation process, such as the dynamics occurring at higher moments of the inflation distribution. For example, the central bank may be interested in evaluating unattractive outcomes for the economy such as deflation or high inflation, and those models that rely only on the conditional mean will not offer the tools to do such evaluations. Accurate characterization of the complete distribution of future inflation, beyond the conditional mean, is needed. This paper examines whether indicators of economic activity carry relevant information about the 14
15 dynamics of higher moments of inflation, and hence help improve the accuracy of density forecasts. Our findings indicate that, in particular for the core inflation measures, conditioning the dynamics of the inflation distribution on the leading indicators provides more accurate forecasts relative to the random walk model. This is due to the relevance of the activity indicators in forecasting quantile effects that take place far away from the center of the core inflation distribution. We also investigate the possibility of episodic predictability, in the sense that economic indicators might provide more accurate density forecasts during limited periods of the forecasting sample. The results indicate that some variables (in particular housing starts and the unemployment rate) have this characteristic, in particular when forecasting PCE and core-cpi, while they provide consistent evidence of predictability for core-pce throughout the period Overall, our results indicate that economic variables are more useful indicators of the dynamics of the tails of the inflation distribution, rather than its center. This finding can be of particular interest for policy makers when evaluating the likelihood of certain events, such as whether inflation will be above or below a certain level in the future. 15
16 References Amisano, G. and Giacomini, R. (2007). Comparing density forecasts via Weighted Likelihood Ratio Tests. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 25, Ang, A., Bekaert, G. and Wei, M. (2006). Do macro variables, asset markets, or surveys forecast inflation better? Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, Atkenson, A. and Ohanian, L. (2001). Are Phillips Curves useful for forecasting inflation? Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 25, Chernozhukov, V., Fernandez-Val, I. and Galichon, A. (2010). Quantile and probability curves without crossing. Econometrica, 78, Clark, T.E. (2011). Real-time density forecasts from Bayesian Vector Autoregressions with stochastic volatility. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 29, Cogley, T., Morozov, S. and Sargent, T.J. (2005). Bayesian fan charts for U.K. inflation: forecasting and sources of uncertainty in an evolving monetary system. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 29, Corradi, V. and Swanson, N.R. (2006). Predictive density and conditional confidence interval accuracy tests. Journal of Econometrics, 135, D Agostino, A., Giannone, D. and Surico, P. (2006). (Un)Predictability and macroeconomic stability. European Central Bank, working paper No Fisher, J.D.M., Liu, C.T. and Zhou, R. (2002). When can we forecast inflation? Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives Giacomini, R. and Rossi, B. (2010). Forecast comparisons in unstable environments. Journal of Applied Econometrics,, 25, Giacomini, R. and White, H. (2006). Tests of conditional predictive ability. Econometrica, 74, Gneiting, T. and Raftery, A.E. (2007). Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102, Gneiting, T. and Ranjan, R. (2011). Comparing density forecasts using threshold and quantile weighted scoring rules. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 29, Greenspan, A. (1998). Problems of price measurement. Federal Reserve Board, Testimony and Speeches (January 3rd). Greenspan, A. (2004). Risk and uncertainty in monetary policy. American Economic Review, 94, Hodrick, R.J. and Prescott, E.C. (1997). Postwar U.S. business cycles: an empirical investigation. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 29, Jore, A.S., Mitchell, J. and Vahey, S.P. (2010). Combining forecast densities from VARs with uncertain instabilities. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25,
17 Kilian, L. and Manganelli, S. (2008). The central banker as a risk manager: estimating the Federal Reserve s preferences under Greenspan. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 40, Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46, Robertson, J.C., Tallman, E.W. and Whiteman, C.H. (2005). Forecasting using relative entropy. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 37, Rossi, B. and Sekhposyan, T. (2010). Has models forecasting performance changed over time, and when? International Journal of Forecasting,, 26, Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W. (1999). Forecasting inflation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 44, Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W. (2007). Why has U.S. inflation become harder to forecast. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 39, Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W. (2008). Phillips curve inflation forecasts. NBER working paper. 17
18 Table 1: h = 6 X Method Core PCE Core CPI SS LS WQS-unif WQS-center WQS-left WQS-right SS LS WQS-unif WQS-center WQS-left WQS-right AR UNEM PC AO-U X IP PC AO-U X INC PC AO-U X WORK PC AO-U X HS PC AO-U X SPREAD PC AO-U X PCE CPI AR UNEM PC AO-U X IP PC AO-U X INC PC AO-U X WORK PC AO-U X HS PC AO-U X SPREAD PC AO-U X Test statistics t n(s) values (see Equation 5) shown in bold indicate that model AO - U X is significantly more accurate than the AO model at the 5% level.
19 Table 2: h = 12 X Method Core PCE Core CPI SS LS WQS-unif WQS-center WQS-left WQS-right SS LS WQS-unif WQS-center WQS-left WQS-right AR UNEM PC AO-U X IP PC AO-U X INC PC AO-U X WORK PC AO-U X HS PC AO-U X SPREAD PC AO-U X PCE CPI AR UNEM PC AO-U X IP PC AO-U X INC PC AO-U X WORK PC AO-U X HS PC AO-U X SPREAD PC AO-U X Test statistics t n(s) values (see Equation 5) shown in bold indicate that model AO - U X is significantly more accurate than the AO model at the 5% level.
20 (a) (b) Figure 1: Test statistics F t(ls) values where model j = AO-U X (X=UNEM, IP GAP, INC GAP, HS, SPREAD) is compared against benchmark k=ao model. The dashed horizontal lines represent the 5% (±2.890) and 10% (±2.626) critical values. The vertical lines indicate the NBER recession dates. (a) (b) Figure 2: Test statistics F t(ls) values where model j = AO-U X (X=UNEM, IP GAP, INC GAP, HS, SPREAD) is compared against benchmark k=ao model. The dashed horizontal lines represent the 5% (±2.890) and 10% (±2.626) critical values. The vertical lines indicate the NBER recession dates. 20
21 Core PCE ( h = 12, predictor= unem ) unem Figure 3: (Top plot) The (red) solid lines denote the quantile forecasts from j = AO-U X model (X=UNEM) for core-pce at 5, 50, and 95% quantile levels, the (blue) dashed lines denote same quantile levels for k = AO model and the circles show the realized core-pce inflation values. (Bottom plot) The unemployment series (shifted forward by h = 12 months). The vertical lines indicate the NBER recession dates. 21
22 Core PCE ( h = 12, predictor= hs ) hs Figure 4: (Top plot) The (red) solid lines denote the quantile forecasts from j = AO-U X model (X=HS) for core-pce at 5, 50, and 95% quantile levels, the (blue) dashed lines denote same quantile levels for k = AO model and the circles show the realized core-pce inflation values. (Bottom plot) The housing starts series (shifted forward by h = 12 months). The vertical lines indicate the NBER recession dates. 22
23 Figure 5: Estimated probability of deflation (defined as a negative inflation rate) for core-pce from k = AO model and j = AO-U X (X=UNEM) for the period 1996:7-2007:12. 23
Forecasting the distribution of economic variables in a data-rich environment
Forecasting the distribution of economic variables in a data-rich environment Sebastiano Manzan Department of Economics & Finance, Baruch College, CUNY Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 11 phone: +1-646-31-348,
More informationYafu Zhao Department of Economics East Carolina University M.S. Research Paper. Abstract
This version: July 16, 2 A Moving Window Analysis of the Granger Causal Relationship Between Money and Stock Returns Yafu Zhao Department of Economics East Carolina University M.S. Research Paper Abstract
More informationOnline Appendix to Bond Return Predictability: Economic Value and Links to the Macroeconomy. Pairwise Tests of Equality of Forecasting Performance
Online Appendix to Bond Return Predictability: Economic Value and Links to the Macroeconomy This online appendix is divided into four sections. In section A we perform pairwise tests aiming at disentangling
More informationWindow Width Selection for L 2 Adjusted Quantile Regression
Window Width Selection for L 2 Adjusted Quantile Regression Yoonsuh Jung, The Ohio State University Steven N. MacEachern, The Ohio State University Yoonkyung Lee, The Ohio State University Technical Report
More informationJournal of Economics and Financial Analysis, Vol:1, No:1 (2017) 1-13
Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis, Vol:1, No:1 (2017) 1-13 Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis Type: Double Blind Peer Reviewed Scientific Journal Printed ISSN: 2521-6627 Online ISSN:
More informationDepartment of Economics Working Paper
Department of Economics Working Paper Rethinking Cointegration and the Expectation Hypothesis of the Term Structure Jing Li Miami University George Davis Miami University August 2014 Working Paper # -
More informationDo core inflation measures help forecast inflation? Out-of-sample evidence from French data
Economics Letters 69 (2000) 261 266 www.elsevier.com/ locate/ econbase Do core inflation measures help forecast inflation? Out-of-sample evidence from French data Herve Le Bihan *, Franck Sedillot Banque
More informationPredicting Inflation without Predictive Regressions
Predicting Inflation without Predictive Regressions Liuren Wu Baruch College, City University of New York Joint work with Jian Hua 6th Annual Conference of the Society for Financial Econometrics June 12-14,
More informationThe Great Moderation Flattens Fat Tails: Disappearing Leptokurtosis
The Great Moderation Flattens Fat Tails: Disappearing Leptokurtosis WenShwo Fang Department of Economics Feng Chia University 100 WenHwa Road, Taichung, TAIWAN Stephen M. Miller* College of Business University
More informationDiscussion of Trend Inflation in Advanced Economies
Discussion of Trend Inflation in Advanced Economies James Morley University of New South Wales 1. Introduction Garnier, Mertens, and Nelson (this issue, GMN hereafter) conduct model-based trend/cycle decomposition
More informationThe University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2009, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam
The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2009, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay Solutions to Final Exam Problem A: (42 pts) Answer briefly the following questions. 1. Questions
More informationFinancial Econometrics
Financial Econometrics Volatility Gerald P. Dwyer Trinity College, Dublin January 2013 GPD (TCD) Volatility 01/13 1 / 37 Squared log returns for CRSP daily GPD (TCD) Volatility 01/13 2 / 37 Absolute value
More informationRisk-Adjusted Futures and Intermeeting Moves
issn 1936-5330 Risk-Adjusted Futures and Intermeeting Moves Brent Bundick Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City First Version: October 2007 This Version: June 2008 RWP 07-08 Abstract Piazzesi and Swanson
More informationForecasting Stock Index Futures Price Volatility: Linear vs. Nonlinear Models
The Financial Review 37 (2002) 93--104 Forecasting Stock Index Futures Price Volatility: Linear vs. Nonlinear Models Mohammad Najand Old Dominion University Abstract The study examines the relative ability
More informationRegional Business Cycles In the United States
Regional Business Cycles In the United States By Gary L. Shelley Peer Reviewed Dr. Gary L. Shelley (shelley@etsu.edu) is an Associate Professor of Economics, Department of Economics and Finance, East Tennessee
More informationVolume 35, Issue 1. Thai-Ha Le RMIT University (Vietnam Campus)
Volume 35, Issue 1 Exchange rate determination in Vietnam Thai-Ha Le RMIT University (Vietnam Campus) Abstract This study investigates the determinants of the exchange rate in Vietnam and suggests policy
More informationResearch Article The Volatility of the Index of Shanghai Stock Market Research Based on ARCH and Its Extended Forms
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume 2009, Article ID 743685, 9 pages doi:10.1155/2009/743685 Research Article The Volatility of the Index of Shanghai Stock Market Research Based on ARCH and
More informationCOINTEGRATION AND MARKET EFFICIENCY: AN APPLICATION TO THE CANADIAN TREASURY BILL MARKET. Soo-Bin Park* Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6
1 COINTEGRATION AND MARKET EFFICIENCY: AN APPLICATION TO THE CANADIAN TREASURY BILL MARKET Soo-Bin Park* Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6 Abstract: In this study we examine if the spot and forward
More informationLecture 8: Markov and Regime
Lecture 8: Markov and Regime Switching Models Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20192 Financial Econometrics Spring 2016 Overview Motivation Deterministic vs. Endogeneous, Stochastic Switching Dummy Regressiom Switching
More informationChapter 5 Univariate time-series analysis. () Chapter 5 Univariate time-series analysis 1 / 29
Chapter 5 Univariate time-series analysis () Chapter 5 Univariate time-series analysis 1 / 29 Time-Series Time-series is a sequence fx 1, x 2,..., x T g or fx t g, t = 1,..., T, where t is an index denoting
More informationMarket Timing Does Work: Evidence from the NYSE 1
Market Timing Does Work: Evidence from the NYSE 1 Devraj Basu Alexander Stremme Warwick Business School, University of Warwick November 2005 address for correspondence: Alexander Stremme Warwick Business
More informationInflation Regimes and Monetary Policy Surprises in the EU
Inflation Regimes and Monetary Policy Surprises in the EU Tatjana Dahlhaus Danilo Leiva-Leon November 7, VERY PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE Abstract This paper assesses the effect of monetary policy during
More informationA Note on the Oil Price Trend and GARCH Shocks
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive A Note on the Oil Price Trend and GARCH Shocks Li Jing and Henry Thompson 2010 Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20654/ MPRA Paper No. 20654, posted 13. February
More informationLecture 9: Markov and Regime
Lecture 9: Markov and Regime Switching Models Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20192 Financial Econometrics Spring 2017 Overview Motivation Deterministic vs. Endogeneous, Stochastic Switching Dummy Regressiom Switching
More informationStock market firm-level information and real economic activity
Stock market firm-level information and real economic activity F. di Mauro, F. Fornari, D. Mannucci Presentation at the EFIGE Associate Partner Meeting Milano, 31 March 2011 March 29, 2011 The Great Recession
More informationIdiosyncratic risk, insurance, and aggregate consumption dynamics: a likelihood perspective
Idiosyncratic risk, insurance, and aggregate consumption dynamics: a likelihood perspective Alisdair McKay Boston University June 2013 Microeconomic evidence on insurance - Consumption responds to idiosyncratic
More informationUnemployment Fluctuations and Nominal GDP Targeting
Unemployment Fluctuations and Nominal GDP Targeting Roberto M. Billi Sveriges Riksbank 3 January 219 Abstract I evaluate the welfare performance of a target for the level of nominal GDP in the context
More informationINFLATION FORECASTS USING THE TIPS YIELD CURVE
A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Masters Degree in Economics from the NOVA School of Business and Economics. INFLATION FORECASTS USING THE TIPS YIELD CURVE MIGUEL
More informationAmath 546/Econ 589 Univariate GARCH Models: Advanced Topics
Amath 546/Econ 589 Univariate GARCH Models: Advanced Topics Eric Zivot April 29, 2013 Lecture Outline The Leverage Effect Asymmetric GARCH Models Forecasts from Asymmetric GARCH Models GARCH Models with
More informationInflation Targeting and Revisions to Inflation Data: A Case Study with PCE Inflation * Calvin Price July 2011
Inflation Targeting and Revisions to Inflation Data: A Case Study with PCE Inflation * Calvin Price July 2011 Introduction Central banks around the world have come to recognize the importance of maintaining
More information9. Logit and Probit Models For Dichotomous Data
Sociology 740 John Fox Lecture Notes 9. Logit and Probit Models For Dichotomous Data Copyright 2014 by John Fox Logit and Probit Models for Dichotomous Responses 1 1. Goals: I To show how models similar
More informationINFORMATION EFFICIENCY HYPOTHESIS THE FINANCIAL VOLATILITY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC CASE
INFORMATION EFFICIENCY HYPOTHESIS THE FINANCIAL VOLATILITY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC CASE Abstract Petr Makovský If there is any market which is said to be effective, this is the the FOREX market. Here we
More informationMore on Modern Monetary Policy Rules
More on Modern Monetary Policy Rules James Bullard President and CEO Indiana Bankers Association Indiana Economic Outlook Forum Dec. 7, 2018 Carmel, Ind. Any opinions expressed here are my own and do not
More informationDemographics and the behavior of interest rates
Demographics and the behavior of interest rates (C. Favero, A. Gozluklu and H. Yang) Discussion by Michele Lenza European Central Bank and ECARES-ULB Firenze 18-19 June 2015 Rubric Persistence in interest
More informationDeterminants of Cyclical Aggregate Dividend Behavior
Review of Economics & Finance Submitted on 01/Apr./2012 Article ID: 1923-7529-2012-03-71-08 Samih Antoine Azar Determinants of Cyclical Aggregate Dividend Behavior Dr. Samih Antoine Azar Faculty of Business
More informationForecasting Volatility movements using Markov Switching Regimes. This paper uses Markov switching models to capture volatility dynamics in exchange
Forecasting Volatility movements using Markov Switching Regimes George S. Parikakis a1, Theodore Syriopoulos b a Piraeus Bank, Corporate Division, 4 Amerikis Street, 10564 Athens Greece bdepartment of
More informationFinancial Econometrics Notes. Kevin Sheppard University of Oxford
Financial Econometrics Notes Kevin Sheppard University of Oxford Monday 15 th January, 2018 2 This version: 22:52, Monday 15 th January, 2018 2018 Kevin Sheppard ii Contents 1 Probability, Random Variables
More informationAsymmetric fan chart a graphical representation of the inflation prediction risk
Asymmetric fan chart a graphical representation of the inflation prediction ASYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF THE PREDICTION RISK The uncertainty of a prediction is related to the in the input assumptions for
More informationCredit Shocks and the U.S. Business Cycle. Is This Time Different? Raju Huidrom University of Virginia. Midwest Macro Conference
Credit Shocks and the U.S. Business Cycle: Is This Time Different? Raju Huidrom University of Virginia May 31, 214 Midwest Macro Conference Raju Huidrom Credit Shocks and the U.S. Business Cycle Background
More informationMODELING VOLATILITY OF US CONSUMER CREDIT SERIES
MODELING VOLATILITY OF US CONSUMER CREDIT SERIES Ellis Heath Harley Langdale, Jr. College of Business Administration Valdosta State University 1500 N. Patterson Street Valdosta, GA 31698 ABSTRACT Consumer
More informationGovernment Tax Revenue, Expenditure, and Debt in Sri Lanka : A Vector Autoregressive Model Analysis
Government Tax Revenue, Expenditure, and Debt in Sri Lanka : A Vector Autoregressive Model Analysis Introduction Uthajakumar S.S 1 and Selvamalai. T 2 1 Department of Economics, University of Jaffna. 2
More informationWORKING PAPER SERIES NO 605 / APRIL 2006
WORKING PAPER SERIES NO 605 / APRIL 2006 (UN)PREDICTABILITY AND MACROECONOMIC STABILITY Antonello D Agostino, Domenico Giannone and Paolo Surico WORKING PAPER SERIES NO 605 / APRIL 2006 (UN)PREDICTABILITY
More informationDiscussion of The Role of Expectations in Inflation Dynamics
Discussion of The Role of Expectations in Inflation Dynamics James H. Stock Department of Economics, Harvard University and the NBER 1. Introduction Rational expectations are at the heart of the dynamic
More informationEconomics Letters 108 (2010) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Economics Letters. journal homepage:
Economics Letters 108 (2010) 167 171 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Economics Letters journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet Is there a financial accelerator in US banking? Evidence
More informationChapter 9 Dynamic Models of Investment
George Alogoskoufis, Dynamic Macroeconomic Theory, 2015 Chapter 9 Dynamic Models of Investment In this chapter we present the main neoclassical model of investment, under convex adjustment costs. This
More informationECONOMIC COMMENTARY. When Might the Federal Funds Rate Lift Off? Edward S. Knotek II and Saeed Zaman
ECONOMIC COMMENTARY Number 213-19 December 4, 213 When Might the Federal Funds Rate Lift Off? Computing the Probabilities of Crossing Unemployment and Inflation Thresholds (and Floors) Edward S. Knotek
More informationIS INFLATION VOLATILITY CORRELATED FOR THE US AND CANADA?
IS INFLATION VOLATILITY CORRELATED FOR THE US AND CANADA? C. Barry Pfitzner, Department of Economics/Business, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA, bpfitzne@rmc.edu ABSTRACT This paper investigates the
More informationGDP, Share Prices, and Share Returns: Australian and New Zealand Evidence
Journal of Money, Investment and Banking ISSN 1450-288X Issue 5 (2008) EuroJournals Publishing, Inc. 2008 http://www.eurojournals.com/finance.htm GDP, Share Prices, and Share Returns: Australian and New
More informationFE670 Algorithmic Trading Strategies. Stevens Institute of Technology
FE670 Algorithmic Trading Strategies Lecture 4. Cross-Sectional Models and Trading Strategies Steve Yang Stevens Institute of Technology 09/26/2013 Outline 1 Cross-Sectional Methods for Evaluation of Factor
More informationDoes Commodity Price Index predict Canadian Inflation?
2011 年 2 月第十四卷一期 Vol. 14, No. 1, February 2011 Does Commodity Price Index predict Canadian Inflation? Tao Chen http://cmr.ba.ouhk.edu.hk Web Journal of Chinese Management Review Vol. 14 No 1 1 Does Commodity
More informationUniversity of Pretoria Department of Economics Working Paper Series
University of Pretoria Department of Economics Working Paper Series On Economic Uncertainty, Stock Market Predictability and Nonlinear Spillover Effects Stelios Bekiros IPAG Business School, European University
More informationCombining State-Dependent Forecasts of Equity Risk Premium
Combining State-Dependent Forecasts of Equity Risk Premium Daniel de Almeida, Ana-Maria Fuertes and Luiz Koodi Hotta Universidad Carlos III de Madrid September 15, 216 Almeida, Fuertes and Hotta (UC3M)
More informationThe Comovements Along the Term Structure of Oil Forwards in Periods of High and Low Volatility: How Tight Are They?
The Comovements Along the Term Structure of Oil Forwards in Periods of High and Low Volatility: How Tight Are They? Massimiliano Marzo and Paolo Zagaglia This version: January 6, 29 Preliminary: comments
More informationMonetary Policy and Medium-Term Fiscal Planning
Doug Hostland Department of Finance Working Paper * 2001-20 * The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not reflect those of the Department of Finance. A previous version of this
More informationThi-Thanh Phan, Int. Eco. Res, 2016, v7i6, 39 48
INVESTMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN CHINA AND THE UNITED STATES: AN APPLICATION OF THE ARDL MODEL Thi-Thanh Phan [1], Ph.D Program in Business College of Business, Chung Yuan Christian University Email:
More informationCommentary: Challenges for Monetary Policy: New and Old
Commentary: Challenges for Monetary Policy: New and Old John B. Taylor Mervyn King s paper is jam-packed with interesting ideas and good common sense about monetary policy. I admire the clearly stated
More informationWhy the saving rate has been falling in Japan
October 2007 Why the saving rate has been falling in Japan Yoshiaki Azuma and Takeo Nakao Doshisha University Faculty of Economics Imadegawa Karasuma Kamigyo Kyoto 602-8580 Japan Doshisha University Working
More informationJaime Frade Dr. Niu Interest rate modeling
Interest rate modeling Abstract In this paper, three models were used to forecast short term interest rates for the 3 month LIBOR. Each of the models, regression time series, GARCH, and Cox, Ingersoll,
More informationMEASURING THE OPTIMAL MACROECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY INDEX FOR TURKEY
ECONOMIC ANNALS, Volume LXI, No. 210 / July September 2016 UDC: 3.33 ISSN: 0013-3264 DOI:10.2298/EKA1610007E Havvanur Feyza Erdem* Rahmi Yamak** MEASURING THE OPTIMAL MACROECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY INDEX FOR
More informationLong-run Consumption Risks in Assets Returns: Evidence from Economic Divisions
Long-run Consumption Risks in Assets Returns: Evidence from Economic Divisions Abdulrahman Alharbi 1 Abdullah Noman 2 Abstract: Bansal et al (2009) paper focus on measuring risk in consumption especially
More informationProperties of the estimated five-factor model
Informationin(andnotin)thetermstructure Appendix. Additional results Greg Duffee Johns Hopkins This draft: October 8, Properties of the estimated five-factor model No stationary term structure model is
More informationEstimating a Monetary Policy Rule for India
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Estimating a Monetary Policy Rule for India Michael Hutchison and Rajeswari Sengupta and Nirvikar Singh University of California Santa Cruz 3. March 2010 Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21106/
More informationForecasting Singapore economic growth with mixed-frequency data
Edith Cowan University Research Online ECU Publications 2013 2013 Forecasting Singapore economic growth with mixed-frequency data A. Tsui C.Y. Xu Zhaoyong Zhang Edith Cowan University, zhaoyong.zhang@ecu.edu.au
More informationA Note on Predicting Returns with Financial Ratios
A Note on Predicting Returns with Financial Ratios Amit Goyal Goizueta Business School Emory University Ivo Welch Yale School of Management Yale Economics Department NBER December 16, 2003 Abstract This
More informationForecasting the Return Distribution Using High-Frequency Volatility Measures
Forecasting the Return Distribution Using High-Frequency Volatility Measures Jian Hua and Sebastiano Manzan Department of Economics & Finance Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College, CUNY Abstract The
More informationFRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER
FRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER 15- July, 15 Assessing the Recent Behavior of Inflation BY KEVIN J. LANSING Inflation has remained below the FOMC s long-run target of % for more than three years. But this sustained
More informationResearch Memo: Adding Nonfarm Employment to the Mixed-Frequency VAR Model
Research Memo: Adding Nonfarm Employment to the Mixed-Frequency VAR Model Kenneth Beauchemin Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis January 2015 Abstract This memo describes a revision to the mixed-frequency
More informationTESTING THE EXPECTATIONS HYPOTHESIS ON CORPORATE BOND YIELDS. Samih Antoine Azar *
RAE REVIEW OF APPLIED ECONOMICS Vol., No. 1-2, (January-December 2010) TESTING THE EXPECTATIONS HYPOTHESIS ON CORPORATE BOND YIELDS Samih Antoine Azar * Abstract: This paper has the purpose of testing
More informationEstimating the Natural Rate of Unemployment in Hong Kong
Estimating the Natural Rate of Unemployment in Hong Kong Petra Gerlach-Kristen Hong Kong Institute of Economics and Business Strategy May, Abstract This paper uses unobserved components analysis to estimate
More informationMONETARY POLICY EXPECTATIONS AND BOOM-BUST CYCLES IN THE HOUSING MARKET*
Articles Winter 9 MONETARY POLICY EXPECTATIONS AND BOOM-BUST CYCLES IN THE HOUSING MARKET* Caterina Mendicino**. INTRODUCTION Boom-bust cycles in asset prices and economic activity have been a central
More informationDiscussion of The Term Structure of Growth-at-Risk
Discussion of The Term Structure of Growth-at-Risk Frank Schorfheide University of Pennsylvania, CEPR, NBER, PIER March 2018 Pushing the Frontier of Central Bank s Macro Modeling Preliminaries This paper
More informationMacroeconometrics - handout 5
Macroeconometrics - handout 5 Piotr Wojcik, Katarzyna Rosiak-Lada pwojcik@wne.uw.edu.pl, klada@wne.uw.edu.pl May 10th or 17th, 2007 This classes is based on: Clarida R., Gali J., Gertler M., [1998], Monetary
More informationInt. Statistical Inst.: Proc. 58th World Statistical Congress, 2011, Dublin (Session CPS001) p approach
Int. Statistical Inst.: Proc. 58th World Statistical Congress, 2011, Dublin (Session CPS001) p.5901 What drives short rate dynamics? approach A functional gradient descent Audrino, Francesco University
More informationLECTURE 11 Monetary Policy at the Zero Lower Bound: Quantitative Easing. November 2, 2016
Economics 210c/236a Fall 2016 Christina Romer David Romer LECTURE 11 Monetary Policy at the Zero Lower Bound: Quantitative Easing November 2, 2016 I. OVERVIEW Monetary Policy at the Zero Lower Bound: Expectations
More informationCorresponding author: Gregory C Chow,
Co-movements of Shanghai and New York stock prices by time-varying regressions Gregory C Chow a, Changjiang Liu b, Linlin Niu b,c a Department of Economics, Fisher Hall Princeton University, Princeton,
More informationApplication of Conditional Autoregressive Value at Risk Model to Kenyan Stocks: A Comparative Study
American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 2017; 6(3): 150-155 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajtas doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20170603.13 ISSN: 2326-8999 (Print); ISSN: 2326-9006 (Online)
More informationRelationship between Inflation and Unemployment in India: Vector Error Correction Model Approach
Relationship between Inflation and Unemployment in India: Vector Error Correction Model Approach Anup Sinha 1 Assam University Abstract The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between
More informationBusiness Cycles. Trends and cycles. Overview. Trends and cycles. Chris Edmond NYU Stern. Spring Start by looking at quarterly US real GDP
Trends and cycles Business Cycles Start by looking at quarterly US real Chris Edmond NYU Stern Spring 2007 1 3 Overview Trends and cycles Business cycle properties does not grow smoothly: booms and recessions
More informationLECTURE 8 Monetary Policy at the Zero Lower Bound: Quantitative Easing. October 10, 2018
Economics 210c/236a Fall 2018 Christina Romer David Romer LECTURE 8 Monetary Policy at the Zero Lower Bound: Quantitative Easing October 10, 2018 Announcements Paper proposals due on Friday (October 12).
More informationA Note on the Oil Price Trend and GARCH Shocks
A Note on the Oil Price Trend and GARCH Shocks Jing Li* and Henry Thompson** This paper investigates the trend in the monthly real price of oil between 1990 and 2008 with a generalized autoregressive conditional
More informationAugmenting Okun s Law with Earnings and the Unemployment Puzzle of 2011
Augmenting Okun s Law with Earnings and the Unemployment Puzzle of 2011 Kurt G. Lunsford University of Wisconsin Madison January 2013 Abstract I propose an augmented version of Okun s law that regresses
More informationThe Yield Curve as a Predictor of Economic Activity the Case of the EU- 15
The Yield Curve as a Predictor of Economic Activity the Case of the EU- 15 Jana Hvozdenska Masaryk University Faculty of Economics and Administration, Department of Finance Lipova 41a Brno, 602 00 Czech
More informationTesting the Stability of Demand for Money in Tonga
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Testing the Stability of Demand for Money in Tonga Saten Kumar and Billy Manoka University of the South Pacific, University of Papua New Guinea 12. June 2008 Online at
More informationReturn to Capital in a Real Business Cycle Model
Return to Capital in a Real Business Cycle Model Paul Gomme, B. Ravikumar, and Peter Rupert Can the neoclassical growth model generate fluctuations in the return to capital similar to those observed in
More informationA Threshold Multivariate Model to Explain Fiscal Multipliers with Government Debt
Econometric Research in Finance Vol. 4 27 A Threshold Multivariate Model to Explain Fiscal Multipliers with Government Debt Leonardo Augusto Tariffi University of Barcelona, Department of Economics Submitted:
More informationCase Study: Predicting U.S. Saving Behavior after the 2008 Financial Crisis (proposed solution)
2 Case Study: Predicting U.S. Saving Behavior after the 2008 Financial Crisis (proposed solution) 1. Data on U.S. consumption, income, and saving for 1947:1 2014:3 can be found in MF_Data.wk1, pagefile
More informationCross-Sectional Distribution of GARCH Coefficients across S&P 500 Constituents : Time-Variation over the Period
Cahier de recherche/working Paper 13-13 Cross-Sectional Distribution of GARCH Coefficients across S&P 500 Constituents : Time-Variation over the Period 2000-2012 David Ardia Lennart F. Hoogerheide Mai/May
More informationCenturial Evidence of Breaks in the Persistence of Unemployment
Centurial Evidence of Breaks in the Persistence of Unemployment Atanu Ghoshray a and Michalis P. Stamatogiannis b, a Newcastle University Business School, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4SE, UK b Department
More informationThe relationship between output and unemployment in France and United Kingdom
The relationship between output and unemployment in France and United Kingdom Gaétan Stephan 1 University of Rennes 1, CREM April 2012 (Preliminary draft) Abstract We model the relation between output
More informationThe Kalman Filter Approach for Estimating the Natural Unemployment Rate in Romania
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS DANUBIUS Vol 10, no 1, 2014 The Kalman Filter Approach for Estimating the Natural Unemployment Rate in Romania Mihaela Simionescu 1 Abstract: The aim of this research is to determine
More informationstarting on 5/1/1953 up until 2/1/2017.
An Actuary s Guide to Financial Applications: Examples with EViews By William Bourgeois An actuary is a business professional who uses statistics to determine and analyze risks for companies. In this guide,
More information1 Volatility Definition and Estimation
1 Volatility Definition and Estimation 1.1 WHAT IS VOLATILITY? It is useful to start with an explanation of what volatility is, at least for the purpose of clarifying the scope of this book. Volatility
More informationThis homework assignment uses the material on pages ( A moving average ).
Module 2: Time series concepts HW Homework assignment: equally weighted moving average This homework assignment uses the material on pages 14-15 ( A moving average ). 2 Let Y t = 1/5 ( t + t-1 + t-2 +
More informationInternet Appendix for: Cyclical Dispersion in Expected Defaults
Internet Appendix for: Cyclical Dispersion in Expected Defaults March, 2018 Contents 1 1 Robustness Tests The results presented in the main text are robust to the definition of debt repayments, and the
More informationOUTPUT SPILLOVERS FROM FISCAL POLICY
OUTPUT SPILLOVERS FROM FISCAL POLICY Alan J. Auerbach and Yuriy Gorodnichenko University of California, Berkeley January 2013 In this paper, we estimate the cross-country spillover effects of government
More informationChapter 1. Introduction
Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Oil Price Uncertainty As noted in the Preface, the relationship between the price of oil and the level of economic activity is a fundamental empirical issue in macroeconomics.
More informationThe Effects of Oil Shocks on Turkish Macroeconomic Aggregates
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy ISSN: 2146-4553 available at http: www.econjournals.com International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2016, 6(3), 471-476. The Effects of Oil
More informationCourse information FN3142 Quantitative finance
Course information 015 16 FN314 Quantitative finance This course is aimed at students interested in obtaining a thorough grounding in market finance and related empirical methods. Prerequisite If taken
More informationESTIMATING MONEY DEMAND FUNCTION OF BANGLADESH
BRAC University Journal, vol. VIII, no. 1&2, 2011, pp. 31-36 ESTIMATING MONEY DEMAND FUNCTION OF BANGLADESH Md. Habibul Alam Miah Department of Economics Asian University of Bangladesh, Uttara, Dhaka Email:
More informationMacroeconomic Announcements and Investor Beliefs at The Zero Lower Bound
Macroeconomic Announcements and Investor Beliefs at The Zero Lower Bound Ben Carlston Marcelo Ochoa [Preliminary and Incomplete] Abstract This paper examines empirically the effect of the zero lower bound
More information