Long-run Consumption Risks in Assets Returns: Evidence from Economic Divisions
|
|
- Sabina Young
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Long-run Consumption Risks in Assets Returns: Evidence from Economic Divisions Abdulrahman Alharbi 1 Abdullah Noman 2 Abstract: Bansal et al (2009) paper focus on measuring risk in consumption especially in the long-run. They proposed cointegrating dividends and consumption growth and using VAR that utilizes the deviation between the two series as an error correction. I used two datasets with monthly and annual frequency to test the power and predictability of the suggested model in comparison with other wellknown models. The data include S&P500 and all firms covered by CRSP database divided according to their economic division (2-Digit Standard Industrial Classification Codes) from the period 1958 to However, in these samples, we did not find support for the proposed benefits of using error correction VAR model that suggested by Bansal et al (2009) over consumption growth-based VAR. In general, we did not find evidence for long-run stock returns predictability in all tested assets pricing models (C-CAPM, consumption growth-based VAR, Error Correction VAR). Keywords: Assets Pricing, Long-run Risk, Consumption-based model, Vector autoregression (VAR), Error correction model (ECM). 1 Abdulrahman Alharbi, College of Business Administration,Nicholls State University abdulrahman.alharbi@nicholls.edu 2 Abdullah Noman, College of Business Administration, Nicholls State University, abdullah.noman@nicholls.edu 1
2 Long-run Consumption Risks in Assets Returns: Evidence from Economic Divisions Epstein & Zin (1989) propose that systematic risk of an asset is determined by covariance with both returns to the market portfolio and consumption growth. The risk is the changes in consumption and the representative agent is sensitive to that variation over time periods. However, the empirical findings confirmed that the assets pricing models do not explain much of assets pricing anomalies in short-run and perform even worse in longer horizons. The short-run anomalies resulted in well-known puzzles as they represent unexplained deviations from theoretical values. The poor performance of assets pricing models in the long-run triggered a debate about agents determinants of risk in long-run and ways to model them. French & Fama (1988) test the predictability of stock returns in multiple investment horizons and reported increased R 2 with increases in horizons and concluded that past returns might predict the future ones. Cambell & Shiller (1988) find that dividends-price ratio Granger causes the real consumption growth but the relation has the wrong sign. Cochrane (1999, p245) believe that the aggregate dividends are predictable by consumption/dividends ratio and in the long-run where the only source of risk would be the changes in the average consumption growth. Poterba & Summers (1988) tested the long-run of stock returns variances and found it to be less than one suggesting the stocks has less risk in the long-run. However, other researchers disagree with returns predictability. For example, Boudoukh et al (2006) suggested that the long-run predictability of stock is a myth and outlined several reasons for believing so. They show that the regression correlation between 1-year and 2-year estimators are about 99% percent. Therefore, the low predictability in short-run adds up with longer horizons and result in higher beta and R 2 because of regressions correlation. Bansal & Yaron (2004) paper attempts to resolve many assets market by using and consumption and dividends growth rates. They utilize Epstein and Zin s (1989) preference and 2
3 choose price-dividends ratio as it predicts long-horizon equity returns as documented by Campbell and Shiller (1988). The standard consumption-based asset pricing model with power utility with i.i.d consumption growth has problems in explaining equity premium puzzle, risk-free rate puzzle, excess volatility puzzle and a cross-section of stock returns. Bansal & Yaron propose a model that solves these puzzles by changing the two assumptions. Expected consumption and dividend growth contain a small persistent component. Shocks to the expected consumption growth alter the expectations about the assets pricing for long horizons (long-run risk). The conditional volatility of consumption and dividend growth is time-varying, implying time-varying risk premia. Agents fear adverse shocks to long-run growth and require a high-risk premium for holding risky assets. Risk-premia has three sources: short-run risk, long-run risk, consumption volatility risk. The paper supports the assumption that aggregate consumption and dividend growth processes are both has a small but persistent expected growth rate component and a conditional volatility component. Based on the ideas that assets different level sensitivity to various sources of systematic risk justify differences in risk premia, Bansal et al (2005) show that cash flow beta as a measure of economic risks can significantly explain assets risk premia. Asset prices reflect the discounted value of cash flows; return news, consequently, reflects revisions in expectations about the entire path of future cash flows and discount rates. Systematic risks of assets that their cash flows are subject to higher aggregate consumption risks should have larger cash flow beta and thus a higher risk premium. When portfolios have a greater covariance with consumption, they have higher risk premia. Bansal et al (2009) paper focused on measuring risk in consumption especially in the longrun. The paper utilizes the connection of changes in dividends and consumption to model cointegration-based VAR with error correction. The deviations of dividends from consumption contain a unit root causing the two series to drift apart. These deviations contain information about 3
4 the future returns. The suggested model predictability of dividends growth is better than traditional ones in the short and long horizons. That is an indication that the error correction term captures transitory variation in dividend growth rates. The suggested model explains 11.5% of return variation in the short horizon and 44.0% in the long run. The cointegrating residual, included in the error-correction specification, contains distinct information about future returns and is a significant predictor of both future growth rates and future returns at short and intermediate horizons. R 2 of EC-VAR specification explain more 75% at all horizons while other models results deteriorate with time. This proofs that the cointegration relation between dividends and consumption in determining assets risk premia is important in the short as well as the long horizons. Based on the preceding literature review, the long-run risk is usually linked to aggregate consumption. Since different sectors of an economy respond differently to changes in consumption growth, risk premia should be different in each division. I will use S&P500 and all firms covered by CRSP on the basis of their economic division (2-Digit Standard Industrial Classification Codes). I will follow a similar method that was developed by Bansal, Kiku, Yaron (2009) which is a cointegrating relation between dividends and consumption as a measure of long-run consumption risks. They used annual returns data all firms in CRSP from 1929 to 2002 and created twenty weighted-value portfolios. Ten size-sorted deciles portfolios and the other ten are sorted according to Book-tomarket decile portfolio. This attempt will be evidence for or possibly against the long-run consumption risks as being a key determinant of risk premia in all investment horizons. Data Two datasets are used in this paper. Data used are tested at different monthly and annually frequencies. The data includes S&P500 and CRSP monthly data. I am following Bansal et al (2009) methodology. First, I utilize aggregate data, S&P500, to check if the relation dividends and 4
5 consumption growth are maintained at the aggregate level and whether cointegration of this relationship explains something on short and long horizons. Second, I use monthly CRSP data to establish a basis of comparison between our results and that of Bansal et al (2009). Third, I use economic division (2-digit SIC) as a measurement of the strength of the relationship between dividends and consumption growth its cointegration. The reason for using economic division is the firm s in the same division are likely to be affected similarly by market conditions including changes in consumption growth. Moreover, systematic risks of assets that their cash flows are subject to higher aggregate consumption risks should have larger cash flow beta and thus a higher risk premium according to Bansal et al (2005). Table 1A: Summary Statistics: S&P 500 Cash Flow growth Returns Portfolio Frequency mean SD mean SD S&P500 m1 One-month forecast S&P500 m3 3-month forecast S&P500 m6 Six-month forecast S&P500 m12 12-month forecast S&P500 y1 One-year forecast S&P500 y5 Five-year forecast S&P500 y10 Ten-year forecast Table 1B: Summary Statistics: 2-Digit SIC Cash Flow growth Returns 2-Digit SIC mean SD mean SD A. Agriculture, Forestry, & Fishing B. Mining C. Construction D. Manufacturing E. Transportation & Public Utilities F. Wholesale Trade G. Retail Trade H. Finance, Insurance, & Real Estate I. Services J. Public Administration K. Nonclassifiable Establishments
6 Empirical Results In this section, I examine Bansal et al (2009) framework to assets risks in consumption. I first analyze the possibility of cointegrating assets dividends with consumption and what this cointegration effect on the predictability of assets growth rates and returns. I then calculate each portfolio s consumption beta and different investment horizons expected returns as implied by EC- VAR (Error Correction-Vector of Autoregression) framework. Table 2A: Cointegration Parameters and ACF: S&P 500 Portfolio Frequency δ ACF(1) ACF(5) ACF(10) Unit Root S&P500 m1 One-month forecast S&P500 m3 3-month forecast * S&P500 m6 Six-month forecast * S&P500 m12 12-month forecast * S&P500 y1 One-year forecast S&P500 y5 Five-year forecast * S&P500 y10 Ten-year forecast * * indicate existence of unit root Table 2B: Cointegration Parameters and ACF Portfolio Freq. δ ACF(1) ACF(5) ACF(10) Unit Root A. Agriculture, Forest& Fishing Annual B. Mining Annual C. Construction Annual D. Manufacturing Annual E. Transportation &Pub. Utilities Annual F. Wholesale Trade Annual G. Retail Trade Annual H. Fin, Insurance, & Real Estate Annual * I. Services Annual J. Public Administration Annual K. Nonclassifiable Establishments Annual * * indicate existence of unit root 6
7 Table 2 shows the estimated cointegration parameters between portfolios cash flows and consumption, the sample autocorrelation functions (ACF) of the cointegrating residuals, and unit root test statistics and associated critical value. The estimated cointegration parameters are coefficient regressing the deterministically detrended dividends on detrended consumption using OLS. It can be seen that the majority of portfolios with monthly frequency autocorrelations function exhibit a relatively rapid decline. As proposed by Bansal 2009, the long-run dynamics of portfolios dividends and aggregate consumption are governed by the same permanent component that can be eliminated by the appropriate linear combination of the levels. However, monthly frequency does not strongly support this argument as most of them contain a unit root and hence dividends growth and consumption growth cannot be cointegrated. These series that will not be considered in further test and analysis. Moreover, the first column shows the estimated cointegration parameters which change with data frequency changes but it does not have a clear pattern. That is may be an indication that consumption risk is not clear in longer horizons regardless of data frequency. It is also possible that important information which affects dividends is lost when data frequency changed. For instance, the table shows one-year forecast using monthly data, S&P500 m12, and one-year annual data, S&P500 y1 which has a higher cointegration parameters and lower autocorrelation function that decays at a faster pace. Four of 2-digit SIC have a negative relation with growth in consumption. However, two of them has non-stationary and will not be considered in further test and analysis. Wholesale Trade and services sectors have a negative relation with consumption growth. The unit-root tests suggest cointegration of three monthly S&P500 portfolios and one S&P500 portfolios with annual frequency. There are 2 out of 11 sectors has a unit root. The 7
8 remaining portfolios test statistics are close to the MacKinnon critical value of 10% with exception to 5-year forecast. Table 3A : Predictability Evidence: S&P 500 Dividends Growth Portfolio Frequency EC-VAR VAR S&P500 m3 3-month forecast S&P500 m6 Six-month forecast S&P500 m12 12-month forecast S&P500 y10 Ten-year forecast Table 3A above shows the R 2 for projecting dividends in different forecasting horizons using monthly or annual data. The R 2 of dividend projection implied EC-VAR, third column, and VAR, last column, are obtained by running VAR of change in demeaned consumption, dividends, pricedividends ratio and the level of price-dividends ratio. In case of EC-VAR, I add to the previous VAR variables the residual of regressing detrended dividends on detrended consumption as in Bansal et al (2001) to show that dividend growth rates are predicted by the cointegrating residuals. That is the current deviations of an asset s cash flows from their long-run relation with consumption should forecast the dynamics of dividend growth rates while dividends are moving back toward the equilibrium. R 2 increases with increasing forecasting periods for the two models both in monthly series. However, the differences in R 2 of two models are not constant. For example, the R 2 difference increases in the three-month forecast from one month forecast and then decrease in the six-month forecast and again it increases with the 12-month forecast. Annual frequency data shows EC-VAR superior performance in dividends projection compared to VAR model. Although adding error term surely improved the predictability of dividends growth in longer horizons, EC-VAR did not capture the transitory variation in dividend growth rates as argued by Bansal et al (2009). Table 3B: Predictability Evidence: 2-Digit SIC Dividends Growth 8
9 Portfolio Freq. EC-VAR VAR EC-VAR VAR EC-VAR VAR 1-yr 1-yr 5-yr 5-yr 10-yr 10-yr A. Agriculture, Forest& Fishing Annual B. Mining Annual C. Construction Annual D. Manufacturing Annual E. Transportatio &Pub. Utilities Annual F. Wholesale Trade Annual G. Retail Trade Annual I. Services Annual J. Public Administration Annual For the 2-SIC code sectors, the result is mixed. For 1-year horizons, R 2 implied by EC-VAR is relatively better than the other model s R 2 in six sectors. This pattern continues as R 2 implied by ER- VAR in eight sectors for both 5-years and 10-year investment horizons is higher that of consumptionbased VAR model. Although adding error term surely improved the predictability of dividends growth in longer horizons, EC-VAR does not capture the transitory variation in dividend growth rates as argued by Bansal et al (2009). Table 4A : Predictability Evidence: S&P 500 Returns EC-VAR VAR Portfolio Frequency R 2 R 2 TR R 2 R 2 TR S&P500 m3 3-month forecast S&P500 m6 Six-month forecast S&P500 m12 12-month forecast S&P500 y10 Ten-year forecast In table 4A, asset return predictability provides evidence against EC-VAR model. The table shows return and total return projections adjusted R 2 values for horizons 3,6,12 months and 10 years implied by the EC-VAR and VAR model. The EC-VAR specification almost explains nothing about of returns variation. Its best performance is 5% in 10-year forecasting. In contrary to Banasal et al (2009) finding, VAR, the model that does not cointegrate dividends growth and consumption, 9
10 explains between 48% in ten-year forecasting period to 66% of returns variation. Therefore, including the cointegrating residual did not improve the predictability of asset returns. Table 4B: Predictability Evidence: 2-Digit SIC Returns Portfolio Freq. EC-VAR VAR EC-VAR VAR EC-VAR VAR 1-yr 1-yr 5-yr 5-yr 10-yr 10-yr A. Agriculture, Forest& Fishing Annual B. Mining Annual C. Construction Annual D. Manufacturing Annual E. Transportat. &Pub. Utilities Annual F. Wholesale Trade Annual G. Retail Trade Annual I. Services Annual J. Public Administration Annual R 2 implied by EC-VAR specification is always better than that of VAR in all economic sectors for all investment horizons. That indicates that the economics division may be an important factor in explaining dividends and consumption growth cointegration. It also supports the finding that consumption growth affects economic sectors differently and consistent with Bansal et al (2005) viewpoint that systematic risks of assets that their cash flows are subject to higher aggregate consumption risks should have larger cash flow beta and thus a higher risk premium. Table 5A : Conditional Means Returns: S&P 500 Returns Portfolio Frequency EC-VAR VAR S&P500 m3 3-month forecast S&P500 m6 Six-month forecast S&P500 m12 12-month forecast S&P500 y10 Ten-year forecast Table 5B : Conditional Means Returns: 2-Digit SIC Returns Portfolio Freq. EC-VAR VAR EC-VAR VAR EC-VAR VAR 1-yr 1-yr 5-yr 5-yr 10-yr 10-yr A. Agriculture, Forest& Fishing Annual B. Mining Annual
11 C. Construction Annual D. Manufacturing Annual E. Transportatio &Pub. Utilities Annual F. Wholesale Trade Annual G. Retail Trade Annual I. Services Annual J. Public Administration Annual Table 5A above shows mean returns for the portfolios at the 3, 6, 12 months and 10-year horizons as implied by the EC-VAR and VAR models. Table 5B also shows 2-digit SIC base portfolio for both in 1-year, 5-year, 10-year investment horizons. Following Bansal et al (2009), VAR model uses only its beta and the demeaned consumption growth to estimate dividends growth and hence the estimated returns as in Campbell & Sheller (1988). However, EC-VAR adds to dividends growth the correction term before estimating the returns. The conditional returns of the two models are similar and differences between the returns are not affected either by horizon nor by changing the data frequency. This finding is not supportive of the idea that error correction improves the predictability of the returns and cointegrating the dividends growth and consumption growth maintain the long-term relationship of the two series. Table 6A: Consumption Betas by Horizons: S&P 500 Returns UCOND. VAR EC-VAR Portfolio Β S.E. P.vl. β S.E. P.vl. β S.E. P.vl. S&P500 m S&P500 m S&P500 m S&P500 y Table 6 presents the consumption beta by horizon to assess the implications of cointegration as a determinant of assets consumption risks. The betas as implied by the EC-VAR are insignificant and reveal considerable variation with an unexpected negative sign which contradicts the literature. VAR betas are significant throughout the investment horizons but they are much smaller than C-CAPM 11
12 betas. It is noted that as the horizon increases the precision of the estimates suffers since the standard error increases. The tables B and C show 2-digit SIC base portfolio for both in 1-year, 5-year investment horizons. The table uses three assets pricing model: unconditional C-CAPM, EC-VAR, and VAR. Table 6B: One-year Consumption Betas by Horizons: 2-Digit SIC Returns UCOND. VAR EC-VAR Portfolio Β S.E. β S.E. β S.E. A. Agri, Forest& Fish B. Mining C. Construction D. Manufacturing E. Trans &Pub. Utili F. Wholesale Trade G. Retail Trade I. Services J. Public Administ Table 6C: Five-year Consumption Betas by Horizons: 2-Digit SIC Returns UCOND. EC-VAR VAR Portfolio Β S.E. β S.E. β S.E. A. Agri, Forest& Fish B. Mining C. Construction D. Manufacturing E. Trans &Pub. Utili F. Wholesale Trade G. Retail Trade I. Services J. Public Administ The C-CAPM coefficient is significant in all horizon and almost the same for the monthly frequency and very large for the 10-year investment horizons. Some Betas of economic division are negative in all models which reflect the nature of that division rather than a misspecification of data. 12
13 It is clear EC-VAR did not outperform consumption based VAR model. The error- correction model is not supported in our sample. Table 7A: Price of Risk: S&P 500 Monthly and Annual Data Frequency UCOND. EC-VAR VAR Portfolio ƛ S.E. R 2 ƛ S.E. R 2 ƛ S.E. R 2 S&P500 m S&P500 m S&P500 m S&P500 y Table 7B: Price of Risk: All Economic Sectors UCOND. EC-VAR VAR Portfolio ƛ S.E. R 2 ƛ S.E. R 2 ƛ S.E. R 2 1-year year Tables 7A and 7B explore the risk-return relation and with the preceding specifications, C- CAPM and EC-VAR and VAR. The tables present the market prices of risk using one-step GMM and along with that the robust standard errors and R 2 are reported. At the three-month horizon, betas implied EC-VAR model explain 10% of the cross-sectional variation in mean returns with a negative price of risk of 0.58 (SE = 0.02). This explanatory power is sustained with six-month horizons, with adjusted R2 of However, EC-VAR explanatory power with ten-year investment horizons vanishes which also the case in other models. The table also shows 2-digit SIC base portfolio for both in 1-year, 5-year. At the one-year horizon, betas implied EC-VAR model explain 20% of the crosssectional variation in mean returns with a positive price of risk of 0.14 (SE = 0.03). This explanatory power is sustained only in a case of VAR which increases to 60% in five-year investment horizon. However, EC-VAR explanatory power with five-year investment declines tremendously to almost zero in five-year investment horizons. 13
14 Conclusion Bansal et al (2009) paper focused on measuring risk in consumption especially in the longrun. The paper links the changes in dividends and consumption with cointegration-based VAR with error correction to improve model predictability because the deviations of dividends from consumption contain information about the future returns. The possibility of cointegration helps in determining risk premia. Since Bansal et al (2009) concluded that the long-run risk is almost completely dominated by consumption growth, then it has to be true that risk premia of each division in the economy reflect its responses to changes in consumption growth. Because each economic division responds differently to consumption growth shocks, risk premia should be different for each division. Bansal used only annual data from 1929 to 2002 that have only 74 observations which might negatively affect the power of the tests. To avoid that, I used two datasets with monthly and annual frequencies. The data include S&P500 and all firms covered by CRSP on the basis of their economic division (2-Digit Standard Industrial Classification Codes). I first analyze the possibility of cointegrating assets dividends with consumption and what this cointegration effect on the predictability of assets growth rates and returns. I find that two monthly and annual S&P500, two economic divisions (out of 11) series cannot be cointegrated. The EC-VAR predictability power, measured by R 2 of dividend projection, is not superior to the VAR model in most economic sectors and investment horizons. The EC-VAR predictability power is tested by its implied returns. By regressing implied returns on the expected returns, the goodness of fit of EC-VAR is worse than that of VAR model in aggregate data and is not better when it comes to economic division returns predictability. The conditional returns of the two models are similar and differences between the returns are not affected by either the horizon or frequency changes. This finding is not supportive of the idea that error correction improves the predictability of the returns 14
15 and using the cointegration of the dividends growth and consumption growth maintain the long-term relationship of the two series. To assess the implications of cointegration as a determinant of assets consumption risks, the consumption beta by investment horizon were evaluated. Nevertheless, the betas as implied by the EC-VAR are insignificant and reveal considerable variation with an unexpected negative sign. It also noted that EC-VAR did not outperform consumption based VAR model over investment horizons or across divisions. Furthermore, EC-VAR ability to capture that differences in mean returns across various investment horizons evaluated using one-step GMM. EC-VAR was not better than VAR and give a negative price of risk. In our sample, the proposed benefits of EC-VAR over consumption growth-based VAR are noted. The findings of this paper cast doubt on the long-run stock returns predictability regardless of the assets pricing model being used. 15
16 References Bansal, R., & Yaron, A. (2004). Risks for the long run: A potential resolution of asset pricing puzzles. The Journal of Finance, 59(4), Bansal, R., Dittmar, R. F., & Lundblad, C. T. (2005). Consumption, dividends, and the cross section of equity returns. The Journal of Finance, 60(4), Bansal, R., Dittmar, R., & Kiku, D. (2009). Cointegration and consumption risks in asset returns. Review of Financial Studies, 22(3), Boudoukh, J., Richardson, M., & Whitelaw, R. F. (2008). The myth of long-horizon predictability. Review of Financial Studies, 21(4), Campbell, J. Y., & Shiller, R. J. (1988). The dividend-price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors. Review of financial studies, 1(3), Cochrane, J. H. (2005). Asset pricing (Vol. 41). Princeton: Princeton university press. Cutler, D. M., Poterba, J. M., & Summers, L. H. (1998). What moves stock prices?. Bernstein, Peter L. and Frank L. Fabozzi, Epstein, L. G., & Zin, S. E. (1989). Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1988). Dividend yields and expected stock returns. Journal of financial economics, 22(1),
Interpreting Risk Premia Across Size, Value, and Industry Portfolios
Interpreting Risk Premia Across Size, Value, and Industry Portfolios Ravi Bansal Fuqua School of Business, Duke University Robert F. Dittmar Kelley School of Business, Indiana University Christian T. Lundblad
More informationRisks for the Long Run: A Potential Resolution of Asset Pricing Puzzles
: A Potential Resolution of Asset Pricing Puzzles, JF (2004) Presented by: Esben Hedegaard NYUStern October 12, 2009 Outline 1 Introduction 2 The Long-Run Risk Solving the 3 Data and Calibration Results
More informationEstimation and Test of a Simple Consumption-Based Asset Pricing Model
Estimation and Test of a Simple Consumption-Based Asset Pricing Model Byoung-Kyu Min This version: January 2013 Abstract We derive and test a consumption-based intertemporal asset pricing model in which
More informationInterpreting Risk Premia Across Size, Value, and Industry Portfolios
Interpreting Risk Premia Across Size, Value, and Industry Portfolios Ravi Bansal Fuqua School of Business, Duke University Robert F. Dittmar Kelley School of Business, Indiana University Christian T. Lundblad
More informationEIEF, Graduate Program Theoretical Asset Pricing
EIEF, Graduate Program Theoretical Asset Pricing Nicola Borri Fall 2012 1 Presentation 1.1 Course Description The topics and approaches combine macroeconomics and finance, with an emphasis on developing
More informationLong-Run Stockholder Consumption Risk and Asset Returns. Malloy, Moskowitz and Vissing-Jørgensen
Long-Run Stockholder Consumption Risk and Asset Returns Malloy, Moskowitz and Vissing-Jørgensen Outline Introduction Equity premium puzzle Recent contribution Contribution of this paper Long-Run Risk Model
More informationA Note on the Economics and Statistics of Predictability: A Long Run Risks Perspective
A Note on the Economics and Statistics of Predictability: A Long Run Risks Perspective Ravi Bansal Dana Kiku Amir Yaron November 14, 2007 Abstract Asset return and cash flow predictability is of considerable
More informationGDP, Share Prices, and Share Returns: Australian and New Zealand Evidence
Journal of Money, Investment and Banking ISSN 1450-288X Issue 5 (2008) EuroJournals Publishing, Inc. 2008 http://www.eurojournals.com/finance.htm GDP, Share Prices, and Share Returns: Australian and New
More informationFrom the perspective of theoretical
Long-Run Risks and Financial Markets Ravi Bansal The recently developed long-run risks asset pricing model shows that concerns about long-run expected growth and time-varying uncertainty (i.e., volatility)
More informationLiquidity skewness premium
Liquidity skewness premium Giho Jeong, Jangkoo Kang, and Kyung Yoon Kwon * Abstract Risk-averse investors may dislike decrease of liquidity rather than increase of liquidity, and thus there can be asymmetric
More informationEIEF/LUISS, Graduate Program. Asset Pricing
EIEF/LUISS, Graduate Program Asset Pricing Nicola Borri 2017 2018 1 Presentation 1.1 Course Description The topics and approach of this class combine macroeconomics and finance, with an emphasis on developing
More informationAssessing the Dynamic Relationship Between Small and Large Cap Stock Prices
Edith Cowan University Research Online ECU Publications 2011 2011 Assessing the Dynamic Relationship Between Small and Large Cap Stock Prices K. Ho B. Ernst Zhaoyong Zhang Edith Cowan University This article
More informationConsumption, Dividends, and the Cross-Section of Equity Returns
Consumption, Dividends, and the Cross-Section of Equity Returns Ravi Bansal, Robert F. Dittmar, and Christian T. Lundblad First Draft: July 2001 This Draft: June 2002 Bansal (email: ravi.bansal@duke.edu)
More informationNBER WORKING PAPER SERIES A REHABILITATION OF STOCHASTIC DISCOUNT FACTOR METHODOLOGY. John H. Cochrane
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES A REHABILIAION OF SOCHASIC DISCOUN FACOR MEHODOLOGY John H. Cochrane Working Paper 8533 http://www.nber.org/papers/w8533 NAIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts
More informationProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 109 ( 2014 ) Yigit Bora Senyigit *, Yusuf Ag
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 109 ( 2014 ) 327 332 2 nd World Conference on Business, Economics and Management WCBEM 2013 Explaining
More informationCommon Macro Factors and Their Effects on U.S Stock Returns
2011 Common Macro Factors and Their Effects on U.S Stock Returns IBRAHIM CAN HALLAC 6/22/2011 Title: Common Macro Factors and Their Effects on U.S Stock Returns Name : Ibrahim Can Hallac ANR: 374842 Date
More informationThe Asymmetric Conditional Beta-Return Relations of REITs
The Asymmetric Conditional Beta-Return Relations of REITs John L. Glascock 1 University of Connecticut Ran Lu-Andrews 2 California Lutheran University (This version: August 2016) Abstract The traditional
More informationFurther Test on Stock Liquidity Risk With a Relative Measure
International Journal of Education and Research Vol. 1 No. 3 March 2013 Further Test on Stock Liquidity Risk With a Relative Measure David Oima* David Sande** Benjamin Ombok*** Abstract Negative relationship
More informationRelationship between Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Government Bonds
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Relationship between Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Government Bonds Muhammad Imtiaz Subhani Iqra University Research Centre (IURC), Iqra university Main Campus Karachi,
More informationCOINTEGRATION AND MARKET EFFICIENCY: AN APPLICATION TO THE CANADIAN TREASURY BILL MARKET. Soo-Bin Park* Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6
1 COINTEGRATION AND MARKET EFFICIENCY: AN APPLICATION TO THE CANADIAN TREASURY BILL MARKET Soo-Bin Park* Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6 Abstract: In this study we examine if the spot and forward
More informationOULU BUSINESS SCHOOL. Byamungu Mjella CONDITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF RISK-RETURN TRADE-OFF: A STOCHASTIC DISCOUNT FACTOR FRAMEWORK
OULU BUSINESS SCHOOL Byamungu Mjella CONDITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF RISK-RETURN TRADE-OFF: A STOCHASTIC DISCOUNT FACTOR FRAMEWORK Master s Thesis Department of Finance November 2017 Unit Department of
More informationThe relationship between output and unemployment in France and United Kingdom
The relationship between output and unemployment in France and United Kingdom Gaétan Stephan 1 University of Rennes 1, CREM April 2012 (Preliminary draft) Abstract We model the relation between output
More informationSavings Investment Correlation in Developing Countries: A Challenge to the Coakley-Rocha Findings
Savings Investment Correlation in Developing Countries: A Challenge to the Coakley-Rocha Findings Abu N.M. Wahid Tennessee State University Abdullah M. Noman University of New Orleans Mohammad Salahuddin*
More informationMomentum and Long Run Risks
Momentum and Long Run Risks Paul Zurek The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania October 2007 Abstract I model the cross section of equity securities inside a long run risks economy of Bansal and
More informationImplications of Long-Run Risk for. Asset Allocation Decisions
Implications of Long-Run Risk for Asset Allocation Decisions Doron Avramov and Scott Cederburg March 1, 2012 Abstract This paper proposes a structural approach to long-horizon asset allocation. In particular,
More informationLong Run Risks and Financial Markets
Long Run Risks and Financial Markets Ravi Bansal December 2006 Bansal (email: ravi.bansal@duke.edu) is affiliated with the Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708. I thank Dana Kiku,
More informationFactors in the returns on stock : inspiration from Fama and French asset pricing model
Lingnan Journal of Banking, Finance and Economics Volume 5 2014/2015 Academic Year Issue Article 1 January 2015 Factors in the returns on stock : inspiration from Fama and French asset pricing model Yuanzhen
More informationThe Impact of Oil Price Volatility on the Real Exchange Rate in Nigeria: An Error Correction Model
15 An International Multidisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia Vol. 9(1), Serial No. 36, January, 2015:15-22 ISSN 1994-9057 (Print) ISSN 2070--0083 (Online) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v9i1.2 The Impact
More informationIdiosyncratic risk, insurance, and aggregate consumption dynamics: a likelihood perspective
Idiosyncratic risk, insurance, and aggregate consumption dynamics: a likelihood perspective Alisdair McKay Boston University June 2013 Microeconomic evidence on insurance - Consumption responds to idiosyncratic
More informationExpected Returns and Expected Dividend Growth
Expected Returns and Expected Dividend Growth Martin Lettau New York University and CEPR Sydney C. Ludvigson New York University PRELIMINARY Comments Welcome First draft: July 24, 2001 This draft: September
More informationManagement Science Letters
Management Science Letters 3 (2013) 2787 2794 Contents lists available at GrowingScience Management Science Letters homepage: www.growingscience.com/msl A study on relationship between inflation rate and
More informationEmpirical Evidence. r Mt r ft e i. now do second-pass regression (cross-sectional with N 100): r i r f γ 0 γ 1 b i u i
Empirical Evidence (Text reference: Chapter 10) Tests of single factor CAPM/APT Roll s critique Tests of multifactor CAPM/APT The debate over anomalies Time varying volatility The equity premium puzzle
More informationConsumption, Dividends, and the Cross Section of Equity Returns
THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE VOL. LX, NO. 4 AUGUST 2005 Consumption, Dividends, and the Cross Section of Equity Returns RAVI BANSAL, ROBERT F. DITTMAR, and CHRISTIAN T. LUNDBLAD ABSTRACT We show that aggregate
More informationRisk Premia and the Conditional Tails of Stock Returns
Risk Premia and the Conditional Tails of Stock Returns Bryan Kelly NYU Stern and Chicago Booth Outline Introduction An Economic Framework Econometric Methodology Empirical Findings Conclusions Tail Risk
More informationFinancial Constraints and the Risk-Return Relation. Abstract
Financial Constraints and the Risk-Return Relation Tao Wang Queens College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York Abstract Stock return volatilities are related to firms' financial
More informationExamining the Linkage Dynamics and Diversification Opportunities of Equity and Bond Markets in India
Examining the Linkage Dynamics and Diversification Opportunities of Equity and Bond Markets in India Harip Khanapuri (Assistant Professor, S. S. Dempo College of Commerce and Economics, Cujira, Goa, India)
More informationECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS
ECON 337901 FINANCIAL ECONOMICS Peter Ireland Boston College Fall 2017 These lecture notes by Peter Ireland are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-ShareAlike 4.0 International
More informationStock Returns and Equity Premium Evidence Using Dividend Price Ratios and Dividend Yields in Malaysia
18 th World IMACS/ MOSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia 13-17 July 2009 http//mssanz.org.au/modsim09 Stock Returns and Equity remium Evidence Using ividend rice Ratios and ividend Yields in Malaysia Abstract.E.
More informationECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS
ECON 337901 FINANCIAL ECONOMICS Peter Ireland Boston College Spring 2018 These lecture notes by Peter Ireland are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-ShareAlike 4.0 International
More informationBad beta, Goodbye beta: should governments alter the way they evaluate investment projects in light of modern macro-finance theory?
Bad beta, Goodbye beta: should governments alter the way they evaluate investment projects in light of modern macro-finance theory? Andrew Coleman, New Zealand Treasury. August 2012 First draft. Please
More informationFinancial Econometrics Notes. Kevin Sheppard University of Oxford
Financial Econometrics Notes Kevin Sheppard University of Oxford Monday 15 th January, 2018 2 This version: 22:52, Monday 15 th January, 2018 2018 Kevin Sheppard ii Contents 1 Probability, Random Variables
More informationThe Long-Run Risks Model and Aggregate Asset Prices: An Empirical Assessment
Critical Finance Review, 2012, 1: 141 182 The Long-Run Risks Model and Aggregate Asset Prices: An Empirical Assessment Jason Beeler 1 and John Y. Campbell 2 1 Department of Economics, Littauer Center,
More informationFinancial Decisions and Markets: A Course in Asset Pricing. John Y. Campbell. Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford
Financial Decisions and Markets: A Course in Asset Pricing John Y. Campbell Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford Figures Tables Preface xiii xv xvii Part I Stade Portfolio Choice and Asset Pricing
More informationThe Long-Run Risks Model and Aggregate Asset Prices: An Empirical Assessment
The Long-Run Risks Model and Aggregate Asset Prices: An Empirical Assessment The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters.
More informationRisks for the Long Run: A Potential Resolution of Asset Pricing Puzzles
THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE VOL. LIX, NO. 4 AUGUST 004 Risks for the Long Run: A Potential Resolution of Asset Pricing Puzzles RAVI BANSAL and AMIR YARON ABSTRACT We model consumption and dividend growth rates
More informationAsset Pricing in Production Economies
Urban J. Jermann 1998 Presented By: Farhang Farazmand October 16, 2007 Motivation Can we try to explain the asset pricing puzzles and the macroeconomic business cycles, in one framework. Motivation: Equity
More informationVolatility Lessons Eugene F. Fama a and Kenneth R. French b, Stock returns are volatile. For July 1963 to December 2016 (henceforth ) the
First draft: March 2016 This draft: May 2018 Volatility Lessons Eugene F. Fama a and Kenneth R. French b, Abstract The average monthly premium of the Market return over the one-month T-Bill return is substantial,
More information+1 = + +1 = X 1 1 ( ) 1 =( ) = state variable. ( + + ) +
26 Utility functions 26.1 Utility function algebra Habits +1 = + +1 external habit, = X 1 1 ( ) 1 =( ) = ( ) 1 = ( ) 1 ( ) = = = +1 = (+1 +1 ) ( ) = = state variable. +1 ³1 +1 +1 ³ 1 = = +1 +1 Internal?
More informationThe Asset Pricing-Macro Nexus and Return-Cash Flow Predictability
The Asset Pricing-Macro Nexus and Return-Cash Flow Predictability Ravi Bansal Amir Yaron May 8, 2006 Abstract In this paper we develop a measure of aggregate dividends (net payout) and a corresponding
More informationHedging inflation by selecting stock industries
Hedging inflation by selecting stock industries Author: D. van Antwerpen Student number: 288660 Supervisor: Dr. L.A.P. Swinkels Finish date: May 2010 I. Introduction With the recession at it s end last
More informationAnalysis of the Relation between Treasury Stock and Common Shares Outstanding
Analysis of the Relation between Treasury Stock and Common Shares Outstanding Stoyu I. Nancie Fimbel Investment Fellow Associate Professor San José State University Accounting and Finance Department Lucas
More informationRisks For the Long Run: A Potential Resolution of Asset Pricing Puzzles
Risks For the Long Run: A Potential Resolution of Asset Pricing Puzzles Ravi Bansal and Amir Yaron ABSTRACT We model consumption and dividend growth rates as containing (i) a small long-run predictable
More informationOn the economic significance of stock return predictability: Evidence from macroeconomic state variables
On the economic significance of stock return predictability: Evidence from macroeconomic state variables Huacheng Zhang * University of Arizona This draft: 8/31/2012 First draft: 2/28/2012 Abstract We
More informationThe Estimation of Expected Stock Returns on the Basis of Analysts' Forecasts
The Estimation of Expected Stock Returns on the Basis of Analysts' Forecasts by Wolfgang Breuer and Marc Gürtler RWTH Aachen TU Braunschweig October 28th, 2009 University of Hannover TU Braunschweig, Institute
More informationAn Empirical Evaluation of the Long-Run Risks Model for Asset Prices
An Empirical Evaluation of the Long-Run Risks Model for Asset Prices Ravi Bansal Dana Kiku Amir Yaron November 11, 2011 Abstract We provide an empirical evaluation of the Long-Run Risks (LRR) model, and
More informationAsset Pricing with Left-Skewed Long-Run Risk in. Durable Consumption
Asset Pricing with Left-Skewed Long-Run Risk in Durable Consumption Wei Yang 1 This draft: October 2009 1 William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Rochester, Rochester,
More informationMULTI FACTOR PRICING MODEL: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO CAPM
MULTI FACTOR PRICING MODEL: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO CAPM Samit Majumdar Virginia Commonwealth University majumdars@vcu.edu Frank W. Bacon Longwood University baconfw@longwood.edu ABSTRACT: This study
More informationChapter 5 Mean Reversion in Indian Commodities Market
Chapter 5 Mean Reversion in Indian Commodities Market 5.1 Introduction Mean reversion is defined as the tendency for a stochastic process to remain near, or tend to return over time to a long-run average
More informationA Simple Consumption-Based Asset Pricing Model and the Cross-Section of Equity Returns
A Simple Consumption-Based Asset Pricing Model and the Cross-Section of Equity Returns Robert F. Dittmar Christian Lundblad This Draft: January 8, 2014 Abstract We investigate the empirical performance
More informationMarket Integration, Price Discovery, and Volatility in Agricultural Commodity Futures P.Ramasundaram* and Sendhil R**
Market Integration, Price Discovery, and Volatility in Agricultural Commodity Futures P.Ramasundaram* and Sendhil R** *National Coordinator (M&E), National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP), Krishi
More informationRevisiting Idiosyncratic Volatility and Stock Returns. Fatma Sonmez 1
Revisiting Idiosyncratic Volatility and Stock Returns Fatma Sonmez 1 Abstract This paper s aim is to revisit the relation between idiosyncratic volatility and future stock returns. There are three key
More informationB Asset Pricing II Spring 2006 Course Outline and Syllabus
B9311-016 Prof Ang Page 1 B9311-016 Asset Pricing II Spring 2006 Course Outline and Syllabus Contact Information: Andrew Ang Uris Hall 805 Ph: 854 9154 Email: aa610@columbia.edu Office Hours: by appointment
More informationStock Market Risk and Return: An Equilibrium Approach
Stock Market Risk and Return: An Equilibrium Approach Robert F. Whitelaw Empirical evidence that expected stock returns are weakly related to volatility at the market level appears to contradict the intuition
More informationLiquidity Creation as Volatility Risk
Liquidity Creation as Volatility Risk Itamar Drechsler, NYU and NBER Alan Moreira, Rochester Alexi Savov, NYU and NBER JHU Carey Finance Conference June, 2018 1 Liquidity and Volatility 1. Liquidity creation
More informationVolume 35, Issue 1. Thai-Ha Le RMIT University (Vietnam Campus)
Volume 35, Issue 1 Exchange rate determination in Vietnam Thai-Ha Le RMIT University (Vietnam Campus) Abstract This study investigates the determinants of the exchange rate in Vietnam and suggests policy
More informationThe Predictability Characteristics and Profitability of Price Momentum Strategies: A New Approach
The Predictability Characteristics and Profitability of Price Momentum Strategies: A ew Approach Prodosh Eugene Simlai University of orth Dakota We suggest a flexible method to study the dynamic effect
More informationApplied Macro Finance
Master in Money and Finance Goethe University Frankfurt Week 8: From factor models to asset pricing Fall 2012/2013 Please note the disclaimer on the last page Announcements Solution to exercise 1 of problem
More informationWhy Is Long-Horizon Equity Less Risky? A Duration-Based Explanation of the Value Premium
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Finance Papers Wharton Faculty Research 2007 Why Is Long-Horizon Equity Less Risky? A Duration-Based Explanation of the Value Premium Martin Lettau Jessica A.
More informationDiscussion Paper No. DP 07/02
SCHOOL OF ACCOUNTING, FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT Essex Finance Centre Can the Cross-Section Variation in Expected Stock Returns Explain Momentum George Bulkley University of Exeter Vivekanand Nawosah University
More informationAn Analysis of Theories on Stock Returns
An Analysis of Theories on Stock Returns Ahmet Sekreter 1 1 Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Ishik University, Erbil, Iraq Correspondence: Ahmet Sekreter, Ishik University, Erbil, Iraq.
More informationImproving the asset pricing ability of the Consumption-Capital Asset Pricing Model?
Improving the asset pricing ability of the Consumption-Capital Asset Pricing Model? Anne-Sofie Reng Rasmussen Keywords: C-CAPM, intertemporal asset pricing, conditional asset pricing, pricing errors. Preliminary.
More informationDemographics Trends and Stock Market Returns
Demographics Trends and Stock Market Returns Carlo Favero July 2012 Favero, Xiamen University () Demographics & Stock Market July 2012 1 / 37 Outline Return Predictability and the dynamic dividend growth
More informationLocal Government Spending and Economic Growth in Guangdong: The Key Role of Financial Development. Chi-Chuan LEE
2017 International Conference on Economics and Management Engineering (ICEME 2017) ISBN: 978-1-60595-451-6 Local Government Spending and Economic Growth in Guangdong: The Key Role of Financial Development
More informationLong Run Labor Income Risk
Long Run Labor Income Risk Robert F. Dittmar Francisco Palomino November 00 Department of Finance, Stephen Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 4809, email: rdittmar@umich.edu
More informationAvailable on Gale & affiliated international databases. AsiaNet PAKISTAN. JHSS XX, No. 2, 2012
Available on Gale & affiliated international databases AsiaNet PAKISTAN Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences University of Peshawar JHSS XX, No. 2, 2012 Impact of Interest Rate and Inflation on Stock
More informationAn Empirical Evaluation of the Long-Run Risks Model for Asset Prices
Critical Finance Review, 2012,1:183 221 An Empirical Evaluation of the Long-Run Risks Model for Asset Prices Ravi Bansal 1,DanaKiku 2 and Amir Yaron 3 1 Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, and NBER;
More informationINFORMATION EFFICIENCY HYPOTHESIS THE FINANCIAL VOLATILITY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC CASE
INFORMATION EFFICIENCY HYPOTHESIS THE FINANCIAL VOLATILITY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC CASE Abstract Petr Makovský If there is any market which is said to be effective, this is the the FOREX market. Here we
More informationCapital Asset Pricing Model investigation and Testing
Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, vol. 7, no. 6, 2017, 85-97 ISSN: 1792-6580 (print version), 1792-6599 (online) Scienpress Ltd, 2017 Capital Asset Pricing Model investigation and Testing Huang Xian
More informationThe Conditional Relation between Beta and Returns
Articles I INTRODUCTION The Conditional Relation between Beta and Returns Evidence from Japan and Sri Lanka * Department of Finance, University of Sri Jayewardenepura / Senior Lecturer ** Department of
More informationTime-varying Cointegration Relationship between Dividends and Stock Price
Time-varying Cointegration Relationship between Dividends and Stock Price Cheolbeom Park Korea University Chang-Jin Kim Korea University and University of Washington December 21, 2009 Abstract: We consider
More informationUnderstanding Volatility Risk
Understanding Volatility Risk John Y. Campbell Harvard University ICPM-CRR Discussion Forum June 7, 2016 John Y. Campbell (Harvard University) Understanding Volatility Risk ICPM-CRR 2016 1 / 24 Motivation
More informationThe Role of Credit Ratings in the. Dynamic Tradeoff Model. Viktoriya Staneva*
The Role of Credit Ratings in the Dynamic Tradeoff Model Viktoriya Staneva* This study examines what costs and benefits of debt are most important to the determination of the optimal capital structure.
More informationH. J. Smoluk, James Bennett. School of Business University of Southern Maine, Portland, ME Abstract
Evaluating Stock Returns with Time-Varying Risk Aversion Driven By Trend Deviations From the Consumption-to-Wealth Ratio: An Analysis Conditional on Levels H. J. Smoluk, James Bennett School of Business
More informationPaper topic suggestions for PhD Students
Paper topic suggestions for PhD Students These are suggestions for class papers or second year papers. I have not researched their novelty to make sure nobody has done them before (and I welcome pointers
More informationLong-Run Risks, the Macroeconomy, and Asset Prices
Long-Run Risks, the Macroeconomy, and Asset Prices By RAVI BANSAL, DANA KIKU AND AMIR YARON Ravi Bansal and Amir Yaron (2004) developed the Long-Run Risk (LRR) model which emphasizes the role of long-run
More informationThreshold cointegration and nonlinear adjustment between stock prices and dividends
Applied Economics Letters, 2010, 17, 405 410 Threshold cointegration and nonlinear adjustment between stock prices and dividends Vicente Esteve a, * and Marı a A. Prats b a Departmento de Economia Aplicada
More informationDo core inflation measures help forecast inflation? Out-of-sample evidence from French data
Economics Letters 69 (2000) 261 266 www.elsevier.com/ locate/ econbase Do core inflation measures help forecast inflation? Out-of-sample evidence from French data Herve Le Bihan *, Franck Sedillot Banque
More informationThe Common Factor in Idiosyncratic Volatility:
The Common Factor in Idiosyncratic Volatility: Quantitative Asset Pricing Implications Bryan Kelly University of Chicago Booth School of Business (with Bernard Herskovic, Hanno Lustig, and Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh)
More informationTIME-VARYING CONDITIONAL SKEWNESS AND THE MARKET RISK PREMIUM
TIME-VARYING CONDITIONAL SKEWNESS AND THE MARKET RISK PREMIUM Campbell R. Harvey and Akhtar Siddique ABSTRACT Single factor asset pricing models face two major hurdles: the problematic time-series properties
More informationIs the Value Premium a Puzzle?
Is the Value Premium a Puzzle? Job Market Paper Dana Kiku Current Draft: January 17, 2006 Abstract This paper provides an economic explanation of the value premium puzzle, differences in price/dividend
More informationPredictability of Stock Returns
Predictability of Stock Returns Ahmet Sekreter 1 1 Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Ishik University, Iraq Correspondence: Ahmet Sekreter, Ishik University, Iraq. Email: ahmet.sekreter@ishik.edu.iq
More informationAddendum. Multifactor models and their consistency with the ICAPM
Addendum Multifactor models and their consistency with the ICAPM Paulo Maio 1 Pedro Santa-Clara This version: February 01 1 Hanken School of Economics. E-mail: paulofmaio@gmail.com. Nova School of Business
More informationKeywords: Equity firms, capital structure, debt free firms, debt and stocks.
Working Paper 2009-WP-04 May 2009 Performance of Debt Free Firms Tarek Zaher Abstract: This paper compares the performance of portfolios of debt free firms to comparable portfolios of leveraged firms.
More informationAdvanced Macroeconomics 5. Rational Expectations and Asset Prices
Advanced Macroeconomics 5. Rational Expectations and Asset Prices Karl Whelan School of Economics, UCD Spring 2015 Karl Whelan (UCD) Asset Prices Spring 2015 1 / 43 A New Topic We are now going to switch
More informationAsset pricing in the frequency domain: theory and empirics
Asset pricing in the frequency domain: theory and empirics Ian Dew-Becker and Stefano Giglio Duke Fuqua and Chicago Booth 11/27/13 Dew-Becker and Giglio (Duke and Chicago) Frequency-domain asset pricing
More informationGovernment Tax Revenue, Expenditure, and Debt in Sri Lanka : A Vector Autoregressive Model Analysis
Government Tax Revenue, Expenditure, and Debt in Sri Lanka : A Vector Autoregressive Model Analysis Introduction Uthajakumar S.S 1 and Selvamalai. T 2 1 Department of Economics, University of Jaffna. 2
More informationEarnings Announcement Idiosyncratic Volatility and the Crosssection
Earnings Announcement Idiosyncratic Volatility and the Crosssection of Stock Returns Cameron Truong Monash University, Melbourne, Australia February 2015 Abstract We document a significant positive relation
More informationMF890: Ph.D. Seminar in Asset Pricing Theory Spring Semester 2013
Boston College Carroll School of Management MF890: Ph.D. Seminar in Asset Pricing Theory Spring Semester 2013 Monday, 12:00 PM 2:30 PM Professor: David Chapman Fulton 240 Office: Fulton 326B Office Hours:
More informationWhy Is Long-Horizon Equity Less Risky? A Duration-Based Explanation of the Value Premium
THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE VOL. LXII, NO. 1 FEBRUARY 2007 Why Is Long-Horizon Equity Less Risky? A Duration-Based Explanation of the Value Premium MARTIN LETTAU and JESSICA A. WACHTER ABSTRACT We propose a
More informationIntroduction to Asset Pricing: Overview, Motivation, Structure
Introduction to Asset Pricing: Overview, Motivation, Structure Lecture Notes Part H Zimmermann 1a Prof. Dr. Heinz Zimmermann Universität Basel WWZ Advanced Asset Pricing Spring 2016 2 Asset Pricing: Valuation
More information