Case 1:05-cv JSR Document 851 Filed 06/18/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
|
|
- August Mathews
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document 851 Filed 06/18/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x : : In re REFCO, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION : 05 Civ (JSR) : : x DECLARATION OF STEPHEN J. CIRAMI IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL DISTRIBUTION ORDER STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.: COUNTY OF NASSAU ) STEPHEN J. CIRAMI declares as follows: 1. I am the Senior Vice President of Operations for The Garden City Group, Inc. ( GCG ). GCG was retained by Lead Counsel, and approved by the Court, as the Claims Administrator in connection with the Settlements reached in the above-captioned Action. GCG presents this Declaration in support of Lead Plaintiffs Motion for a Supplemental Distribution Order. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein. 1 THE INITIAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUNDS 2. On May 2, 2011, the Court entered the Order Approving Distribution Plan (Dkt. No. 793) (the Initial Distribution Order ), which, inter alia, approved Lead Plaintiffs proposed plan for distribution of the Net Settlement Funds to Authorized Claimants. In accordance with the Initial Distribution Order, GCG issued 3,187 payments in the aggregate amount of 1 All terms with initial capitalization not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Stipulations and in the Declaration of Stephen J. Cirami in Support of Lead Plaintiffs Motion for Approval of Distribution Plan, dated April 18, 2011 (the Initial Cirami Declaration ) (Dkt. No 790).
2 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document 851 Filed 06/18/12 Page 2 of 11 $337,783, to Authorized Claimants between May 27, 2011 and August 5, 2011 (collectively, the Initial Distribution ). 3 Of these payments, 3,085 were issued on May 27, 2011 and 102 were delayed as a result of the motion filed by the Refco Private Actions Trust ( PAT ) seeking to modify the plan of distribution with respect to certain payments that had allegedly been assigned to the PAT. The Court entered an Order on July 27, 2011 resolving all remaining issues concerning the PAT assignments (Dkt. No. 805). All delayed payments to Authorized Claimants were issued on or before August 5, 2011, and a $1,371, wire payment to the PAT was made. THE CLAIMS-IN-PROCESS, LATE ADJUSTED CLAIMS, AND LATE SUBMITTED CLAIMS DISTRIBUTION 3. Pursuant to the Initial Distribution Order, a reserve in the amount of approximately 5% of the Net Settlement Funds was established for Claims-in-Process that were ultimately determined to be eligible to receive distributions if approved by the Court, as well as for other contingencies that may arise (the Reserve ). On September 30, 2011, the Court issued an Order Approving Payment of Eligible Claims-in-Process, Late Adjusted Claims, and Late Submitted Claims (Dkt. No. 812) (the Claims-in-Process Distribution Order ). In accordance with the Claims-in-Process Distribution Order, GCG conducted a Claims-in-Process Distribution between October 21, 2011 and December 20, 2011 using funds from the Reserve to bring the eligible Claims-in-Process, Late Adjusted Claims, and Late Submitted Claims into parity with the claims that were paid pursuant to the Initial Distribution Order. 2 In my previous Declaration, dated September 21, 2011, due to a clerical error, the amount reported as distributed to Authorized Claimants between May 27, 2011 and August 5, 2011 was $0.10 higher. 3 The Initial Distribution Order approved payments to 3,190 Authorized Claimants. However, when the proration factors were applied, three claims did not meet the de minimis threshold in the Court-approved Plan of Allocation. Thus, distributions were not made to those claimants. 2
3 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document 851 Filed 06/18/12 Page 3 of To that end, GCG issued 54 payments in the aggregate amount of $7,500, to Authorized Claimants between October 21, 2011, and December 20, Of these payments, 47 were issued on October 21, 2011, and payments on seven (7) claims, which were identified as potential PAT claims, were deferred at the direction of the Court until any potential objections were resolved. All seven (7) deferred payments were issued to Authorized Claimants on or before December 20, 2011, and a $130, wire payment to the PAT was made. 5. Following this Claims-in-Process Distribution, as with the Initial Distribution, GCG monitored the status of Authorized Claimants checks. To ensure that the maximum number of checks were cashed, GCG performed extensive follow up with Authorized Claimants whose checks were initially uncashed, either because those checks were returned to GCG as undeliverable, or because the Authorized Claimant simply had not cashed the check. For Authorized Claimants whose checks were returned as undeliverable, GCG searched for new addresses via the United States Postal Service National Change of Address database and, where appropriate, via internet search techniques. Where new addresses were located, GCG updated the mailing database accordingly, and reissued distribution checks to Authorized Claimants at the new addresses. 6. GCG also continued to utilize calling campaigns to obtain better addresses for Authorized Claimants whose checks were returned as undeliverable, and to urge Authorized Claimants who did receive their checks to cash them in order to avoid forfeiture of their recoveries. Where an Authorized Claimant advised GCG that he, she or it had lost or damaged the check, or otherwise required a new check, GCG performed check reissues. GCG reissued 4 The Claims-in-Process Distribution Order approved payment on 55 claims. As discussed below, prior to the distribution, one of those claims was determined to be a duplicate claim and, thus, no payment was made on it. 3
4 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document 851 Filed 06/18/12 Page 4 of 11 checks only upon receipt of written instructions from such Authorized Claimants, and provided that the Authorized Claimants returned the first check where appropriate. If a check was deemed lost, GCG voided the initial check prior to reissuing a substitute check. 7. In total, GCG has issued 3,241 payments to Authorized Claimants and two (2) payments to the PAT for total proceeds of $346,787, ($345,284, was distributed to Authorized Claimants and $1,502, was transferred to the PAT). As of June 11, 2012, payments for total proceeds of $343,796,180.85, or 99.9% of the $343,804, distributed to Authorized Claimants in the Initial Distribution and in the Claims-in-Process Distribution (net of the returned funds described below), have been cashed. As of June 11, 2012, nine (9) distribution checks, representing proceeds of $8,679.78, remain uncashed, either because the checks were returned to GCG as undeliverable or because the checks were simply not cashed by the Authorized Claimants. In addition, $203, remained in the Distribution Account because of the downward adjustments to the three claims discussed in paragraph 13 below. Also, $1,479, was returned to the Distribution Account because the payments were: (i) unwanted; (ii) duplicates of other claim filings; (iii) for clients of brokerage firms who had closed their accounts and could not be located by the brokerage firms; or (iv) for claims that were filed in error and withdrawn. Thus, the balance in the Distribution Account currently is $1,691, Additionally, GCG has been advised that there remains $24,448, in the escrow account comprised of the unused portion of the previously established Reserve and additional funds recovered by Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel from victim restitution funds established by the government (collectively the Current Reserve ). 5 In total, $26,140, remains in the Net Settlement Funds ($1,691, in the Distribution Account and 5 This amount also includes interest earned, less bank fees and Taxes. 4
5 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document 851 Filed 06/18/12 Page 5 of 11 $24,448, in the Current Reserve) as of June 11, GCG is now prepared to conduct the Second Distribution of the Net Settlement Funds as authorized by paragraph 3.g. of the Initial Distribution Order. ADDITIONAL LATE SUBMITTED CLAIMS 8. In the Claims-in-Process Distribution Order, the Court approved payment of otherwise eligible Late Submitted Claims and Late Adjusted Claims that were submitted after the entry of the Initial Distribution Order. Since the submission of the Declaration of Stephen J. Cirami in Support of Lead Plaintiffs Motion for Approval of Payment of Claims-In-Process, Late Adjusted Claims, and Late Submitted Claims, dated September 21, 2011 (Dkt. No. 811) (the Supplemental Cirami Declaration ), GCG has received and processed 11 newly submitted claims (the Additional Late Submitted Claims ). 9. Four (4) of the Additional Late Submitted Claims, but for the fact that they are late, would be eligible for payment. Applying the same proration factors used in the Initial Distribution, these late but otherwise eligible Additional Late Submitted Claims would be entitled to Initial Distribution payments totaling $122, Those payments, together with the proposed payments described in paragraph 11 herein, are referred to herein as the Catch-Up Payments. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a list of the 4 late but otherwise eligible Additional Late Submitted Claims and their corresponding Recognized Loss Amounts and Catch-Up Payment distribution amounts. 10. The remaining seven (7) Additional Late Submitted Claims are currently deficient. In order to afford these claimants the same opportunity provided to other claimants, we propose that they be given the opportunity to cure their claims. However, so as not to delay 5
6 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document 851 Filed 06/18/12 Page 6 of 11 the Second Distribution to Authorized Claimants and the additional distributions proposed herein, we propose that, if the claims are cured, they be paid, to the extent possible, out the funds remaining after the Second Distribution is complete. To the extent sufficient funds remain in the Net Settlement Funds, payment would be made on the cured claims using the same proration factors used in the Initial Distribution and in the Second Distribution. Additionally, in the event that any additional claims are either submitted or cured after the date of this Declaration, and are determined by GCG to be eligible for payment but for their late submission, we propose that these claims be paid only after the Second Distribution is complete, and only to the extent sufficient funds remain in the Net Settlement Funds to permit payment of these claims using the same proration factors used in the Initial Distribution and in the Second Distribution. Should there be less than sufficient funds remaining in the Net Settlement Funds to apply the same proration factors, each claimant whose claim is addressed in this paragraph would receive his, her or its pro rata share of the balance of the Net Settlement Funds. ADDITIONAL LATE ADJUSTED CLAIMS 11. In addition to the Additional Late Submitted Claims, since the submission of the Supplemental Cirami Declaration, GCG has received additional documentation for three (3) claims that had been previously rejected in the entirety (the Additional Late Adjusted Claims ). If the Court permits the consideration of the additional documentation, applying the same proration factors used in the Initial Distribution, these Additional Late Adjusted Claims would be entitled to Catch-Up Payments totaling $9, Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a list of the three Additional Late Adjusted Claims and their corresponding adjusted Recognized Loss Amounts and Catch-Up Payment distribution amounts. 6
7 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document 851 Filed 06/18/12 Page 7 of Of the Additional Late Submitted Claims and Additional Late Adjusted Claims, GCG has determined that one claimant, an Additional Late Adjusted Claim (Claim No ), appears on the list provided by the Trustee of the PAT as a person or entity that assigned a portion of its recovery in this Action to the PAT. To the extent that this claim is approved for payment, GCG proposes to follow the procedures established by the Court in its Order Modifying Distribution Plan dated June 2, 2011 (Dkt. No. 800), which were used in connection with the Initial Distribution and the Claims-in-Process Distribution. Specifically, GCG will defer payment of this claim until the Trustee has notified the claimant that a portion of its net settlement proceeds are subject to an assignment to the PAT, and until the claimant has had an opportunity to object. CLAIMS ADJUSTED DOWNWARD 13. Further, after the entry of the Initial Distribution Order, but before the Initial Distribution, the losses on two (2) claims were adjusted downward based on the claimants providing additional information to GCG reducing the value of the claims. The previous Courtapproved Section 10(b) aggregate Recognized Loss Amounts for these two claims totaled $393, After the downward adjustment, the Section 10(b) aggregate Recognized Loss Amount for these two claims is $290, Additionally, after the entry of the Claims-in- Process Distribution Order, but before the Claims-in-Process Distribution, one claim was determined to be a duplicate of another approved claim, and, thus, the Section 11 Recognized Loss Amount on the duplicate claim ($302,100.00) was eliminated. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a list of the three Claims Adjusted Downward and their revised Recognized Loss Amounts. The three claimants whose claims have been adjusted downward were informed of and have not disputed GCG s reduction of their loss amounts. The distributions made to the two claimants 7
8 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document 851 Filed 06/18/12 Page 8 of 11 whose loss amounts were reduced were the lower adjusted amounts, and the claimant whose loss on the duplicate claim was eliminated did not receive a distribution as to that claim. GCG S FEES AND EXPENSES 14. GCG has been paid a total of $634, for its work performed on behalf of the Class through August 31, 2011, which includes the $11, that GCG estimated that it would incur after August 31, 2011 in preparation of, and to conduct, the Claims-In-Process Distribution. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is GCG s invoice reflecting its actual fees and expenses incurred from September 1, 2011 through May 15, 2012, which total $32, Thus, deducting the advance of $11, already paid to GCG, GCG has not been paid $21, for the work it performed on behalf of the Class from September 1, 2011 through May 15, As also set forth in the invoice attached hereto as Exhibit D, GCG estimates that it will incur an additional $22,500 in fees and expenses to distribute the Catch-Up Payments and to conduct the Second Distribution of the Net Settlement Funds described in paragraph 16.d. below The Initial Distribution Order and the Claims-in-Process Distribution Order each authorized payment of the fees and expenses that GCG estimated it would incur in connection with the respective, corresponding distributions of the Net Settlement Funds. See Initial Distribution Order 3.j.; Claims-in-Process Distribution Order 3.i. Further, in both orders, the 6 GCG s estimate to complete the Catch-Up Payments and Second Distribution includes fees and expenses to be incurred in connection with: (i) the calculation of distribution amounts; (ii) printing and mailing checks; (iii) monitoring uncashed and undeliverable checks; (iv) reaching out to Authorized Claimants who have not cashed their checks; and (v) searching for current addresses if checks are returned as undeliverable. It does not cover fees and expenses that may be incurred in connection with a third or further subsequent distributions of the Net Settlement Funds, should they become necessary. The Initial Distribution Order provides for the payment of these additional fees and expenses without further order of the Court. 8
9 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document 851 Filed 06/18/12 Page 9 of 11 Court stated that it retains jurisdiction to consider any further applications concerning administration of the Settlement. See Initial Distribution Order 4; Claims-in-Process Distribution Order 4. Thus, GCG respectfully requests that the Court approve the payment of GCG s fees and expenses set forth in the attached invoice, which total $43,785.75, from the current balance of the Net Settlement Funds. 7 PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF DISTRIBUTION PLAN FOR THE NET SETTLEMENT FUNDS 16. Should the Court concur with GCG s determinations concerning Additional Late Submitted Claims, Additional Late Adjusted Claims, and the Claims Adjusted Downward, GCG recommends the following modification to the existing distribution plan for the Net Settlement Funds: a. The eligible Additional Late Submitted Claims and Additional Late Adjusted Claims will be paid their pro rata share of the Initial Distribution amount from the current balance of the Net Settlement Funds. By receiving these Catch-Up Payments, these claims would reach a state of parity with the claims that were paid in the Initial Distribution and the Claims-in-Process Distribution; b. All Authorized Claimants whose Initial Distribution checks and/or Claims-in-Process Distribution checks are stale-dated and who do not request a check reissue prior to the date of entry of the Supplemental Distribution Order will irrevocably forfeit all recovery from the Settlements, and the funds allocated to all such stale-dated checks will be available for redistribution to other Authorized Claimants; c. GCG will be paid $43, from the current balance of the Net Settlement Funds for its fees and expenses incurred and to be incurred in connection with the Catch-Up-Payment Distribution and the Second Distribution as set forth on the invoice attached hereto as Exhibit D; d. Consistent with paragraph 3.g. of the Initial Distribution Order, GCG will conduct a second distribution of the Net Settlement Funds (the Second Distribution ) pursuant to which the balance remaining in the Net Settlement Funds (including the 7 GCG s invoice attached hereto as Exhibit D includes the costs to destroy all hard-copy documentation, which is now underway consistent with paragraph 3.k. of the Initial Distribution Order. 9
10 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document 851 Filed 06/18/12 Page 10 of 11 Current Reserve and the funds for all void stale-dated checks remaining from the Initial Distribution and the Claims-in-Process Distribution), after deducting the payments described in paragraph 16.a. and 16.c. above, and after deducting any payments for estimated taxes and the costs of preparing appropriate tax returns and any escrow fees, will be distributed to all Authorized Claimants who (1) were not Claims Paid in Full (as defined in the Initial Cirami Declaration), (2) cashed their distribution payment from the Initial or Claims-in-Process Distribution (or have submitted a re-issue request prior to the date of entry of the Supplemental Distribution Order) or are receiving Catch-Up Payments, and (3) would receive at least $20.00 from the redistribution based on their pro rata share of the remaining funds; e. In order to encourage Authorized Claimants who or which will receive payments pursuant to the Supplemental Distribution Order to cash their distribution checks promptly, and to avoid or reduce future expenses relating to unpaid distribution checks, all distribution checks will bear the following notation: CASH PROMPTLY, VOID AND SUBJECT TO RE-DISTRIBUTION IF NOT CASHED BY [DATE 120 DAYS AFTER ISSUE DATE] ; f. The currently deficient Additional Late Submitted Claims, if cured, as well as any claims submitted after the date of this Declaration which GCG deems eligible for payment but for their late submission, shall be paid so as to bring them into parity with the previously-paid claims, to the extent sufficient funds remain in the Net Settlement Funds after the completion of the Second Distribution, without further Order of the Court. Such procedure shall be followed with respect to any additional late claims that may be received until the Net Settlement Funds are exhausted or such time as GCG and Co-Lead Counsel determine that further redistribution is not cost-effective in accordance with paragraph 3.h.ii of the Initial Distribution Order. g. The procedures established by the Court in its Order Modifying Distribution Plan dated June 2, 2011 (Dkt. No. 800), which were used in connection with the Initial Distribution and the Claims-in-Process Distribution shall be applied to the one Additional Late Adjusted Claim that appears on the list provided by the Trustee of the PAT as a person or entity that assigned a portion of its recovery in this Action to the PAT. Such procedures shall also be applied to any additional late submitted claims that appear on the list provided by the Trustee of the PAT and that are determined to be eligible to receive a distribution from the Net Settlement Funds. h. In all other respects, the Distribution Plan approved by the Court in the Initial Distribution Order, as amended by the Order Modifying Distribution Plan dated June 2, 2011, will remain in effect. i. For the sake of clarity, the release of claims against Lead Plaintiffs, Lead Counsel, the Claims Administrator, the Escrow Agent or any other agent retained by Lead Plaintiffs or Lead Counsel in connection with the administration of the Net Settlement Funds as set forth in the Initial Distribution Order will be extended to cover 10
11 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document 851 Filed 06/18/12 Page 11 of 11
12 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document Filed 06/18/12 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A
13 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document Filed 06/18/12 Page 2 of 2 Refco, Inc. Securities Litigation Exhibit A Additional Late Submitted Claims (4 Claims) Claim No. Section 11 Loss Amount Section 10(b) Loss Amount Distribution Amount 5396 $164, $2, $ 92, $12, $3, $ 8, $8, $2, $ 5, $28, $ 15, Totals $214, $8, $122,073.63
14 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document Filed 06/18/12 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT B
15 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document Filed 06/18/12 Page 2 of 2 Refco, Inc. Securities Litigation Exhibit B Additional Late Adjusted Claims (3 Claims) Claim No. Section 11 Loss Amount Section 10(b) Loss Amount Distribution Amount 2531 $5, $2, $6, $3, $5, $2, Totals $17, $9,559.60
16 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document Filed 06/18/12 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT C
17 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document Filed 06/18/12 Page 2 of 2 Claim No. Previously Approved Section 11 Loss Amount Refco, Inc. Securities Litigation Exhibit C Claims Adjusted Downward (3 Claims) Previously Approved Section 10(b) Loss Amount Downward Adjusted Section 11 Loss Amount Downward Adjusted Section 10(b) Loss Amount 8808 $212, $165, $302, $181, $125, Totals $302, $393, $290,822.50
18 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document Filed 06/18/12 Page 1 of 4 EXHIBIT D
19 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document Filed 06/18/12 Page 2 of 4 INVOICE INVOICE DATE 06/12/2012 PERIOD START INVOICE NUMBER THROUGH DATE 09/01/ /15/2012 Description Price Quantity Amount Includes handling undeliverable mail and sorting, prepping & scanning claim forms
20 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document Filed 06/18/12 Page 3 of 4 INVOICE Description Price Quantity Amount
21 Case 1:05-cv JSR Document Filed 06/18/12 Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A Description Amount
Case 1:13-cv JSR Document 93 Filed 09/22/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.
Case 1:13-cv-07183-JSR Document 93 Filed 09/22/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM and FRESNO COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION,
More informationCase 8:07-cv VMC-EAJ Document 290 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6389 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:07-cv-01940-VMC-EAJ Document 290 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6389 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION EASTWOOD ENTERPRISES, LLC, Individually and on Behalf
More informationCase 2:08-cv MJP Document 329 Filed 09/10/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :0-cv-00-MJP Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS
More information~~~~.FJLE.~\-~' tvl~1
Case 1:09-cv-06351-RJS Document 175 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE W ACHOVIA PREFERRED SECURITIES AND BONDINOTES LITIGATION USDSSDNY DOCUMENT
More informationCase 1:08-cv TPG Document 1091 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:08-cv-11117-TPG Document 1091 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE TREMONT SECURITIES LAW, STATE LAW AND INSURANCE LITIGATION
More informationCase 3:14-cv JAG-RCY Document Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 9155
Case 3:14-cv-00682-JAG-RCY Document 217-2 Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 9155 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION IN RE GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC., SECURITIES
More informationc:;;::; ~ORDER APPROVING DISTRIBUTION PLAN
Case 1:08-cv-05523-LAK-GWG Document 596 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~ In re LEHMAN BROTHERS SECURITIES AND ERISA LITIGATION This Document Applies
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION PLAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re BANK OF AMERICA CORP. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE, AND EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT (ERISA) LITIGATION Master File No. 09 MD 2058
More informationCase 2:08-cv ES-JAD Document 454 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 28178
,day Case 2:08-cv-00397-ES-JAD Document 454 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 28178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION / ENHANCE SECURIflES LITIGATION
More informationCase 1:11-cv VM-RWL Document 1186 Filed 10/30/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:11-cv-07866-VM-RWL Document 1186 Filed 10/30/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES
More informationThis Opinion and Order / Relates to ORDER APPROVING DISTRIBUTION PLAN FOR THE NET SETTLEMENT FUNDS
Case 2:05-md-01725-GER Document 495 Filed 07/09/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE: DELPHI CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, MDL No. 1725
More informationCase 1:09-md LAK-GWG Document 1227 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:09-md-02017-LAK-GWG Document 1227 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK USDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECT,RONICAL oot:... ~=-~f-:-j.r+-::-...- DA~JtUI): In
More informationUNITE!) STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOW, THEREFORE, IT 15 HEREBY ORDERED THAT;
UNITE!) STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: DATE FILED; IN RE MB1A, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION File No. 08-C V-264-KMK ORDER APPROVING DISTRIBUTION
More informationCase: 1:08-cv Document #: 682 Filed: 02/21/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:29381
Case: 1:08-cv-05214 Document #: 682 Filed: 02/21/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:29381 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: STEEL ANTITRUST LITIGATION Case
More informationCase 1:04-cv LTS-HBP Document 745 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 4 PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR DISTRIBUTION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND
Case 1:04-cv-09866-LTS-HBP Document 745 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE PFIZER INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 04-cv-9866 (LTS)(HBP) ECF CASE
More informationCase 1:04-cv LTS-HBP Document 746 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-09866-LTS-HBP Document 746 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE PFIZER INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 04-cv-9866 (LTS)(HBP) ECF CASE
More informationCase 1:09-md PKC Document 1031 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:09-md-02058-PKC Document 1031 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re BANK OF AMERICA CORP. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE, AND EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME
More informationCase 1:12-cv AT Document 105 Filed 11/24/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:12-cv-04199-AT Document 105 Filed 11/24/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE KIT DIGITAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 12-CV-4199 (AT) LEAD
More informationCase 1:02-md PB Document 1677 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Case 1:02-md-01335-PB Document 1677 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In Re Tyco International, Ltd. Securities Litigation MDL Docket No. 02-1335-PB
More informationCase 4:08-cv RP-CFB Document Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 12
Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 371-2 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION GREGORY YOUNG, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB
More informationCase 1:11-cv CM Document 79 Filed 11/07/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT NEW YORK
Case 1:11-cv-08331-CM Document 79 Filed 11/07/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT NEW YORK PAUL SHAPIRO, on behalf of himself as an individual, and on behalf of all others similarly
More informationCase 3:14-cv JAG-RCY Document 218 Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 9162
Case 3:14-cv-00682-JAG-RCY Document 218 Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 9162 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION IN RE GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants.
2:06-cv-15601-GER-DAS Doc ## 975 975 Filed 06/07/16 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 45652 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PAT CASON-MERENDA and JEFFREY A. SUHRE on behalf of
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION BULK SETTLEMENT PRACTICE
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-15098 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION In the Matter of CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC; DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.; CREDIT
More informationEXHIBIT A. Case 3:13-cv MOC-DSC Document 58-1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 24
EXHIBIT A Case 3:13-cv-00447-MOC-DSC Document 58-1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AFFIDAVIT OF SARAH EVANS REGARDING THE RESULTS OF THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION PROCESS
EFiled: Sep 14 2017 12:52PM EDT Transaction ID 61117237 Case No. 10742-CB IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MICHAEL DEPINTO, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff,
More informationCase: 1:08-cv Document #: Filed: 02/21/18 Page 1 of 93 PageID #:29395 EXHIBIT 1
Case: 1:08-cv-05214 Document #: 682-1 Filed: 02/21/18 Page 1 of 93 PageID #:29395 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 1:08-cv-05214 Document #: 682-1 Filed: 02/21/18 Page 2 of 93 PageID #:29396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
More information: : : : : : : PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the accompanying affidavit with exhibits of
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------x IN RE TREMONT SECURITIES LAW, STATE LAW AND INSURANCE LITIGATION ---------------------------------------------------------x
More informationCase 1:10-cv TPG Document 11 Filed 09/16/15 Page 1 of 14 G n.ooo., j. os civ. tnn (TPGJ /1 "LECT.RONIC' n. T Tv r.-ry-rn ~~
Case 1:10-cv-09228-TPG Document 11 Filed 09/16/15 Page 1 of 14 G n.ooo., j. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------}( IN RE
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-16757 : In the Matter of : : Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC : and Citigroup Global Markets
More informationCase 3:11-cv GPC-KSC Document Filed 04/24/17 PageID Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT E EXHIBIT E
Case 3:11-cv-01842-GPC-KSC Document 273-7 Filed 04/24/17 PageID.12482 Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT E EXHIBIT E Case 3:11-cv-01842-GPC-KSC Document 273-7 Filed 04/24/17 PageID.12483 Page 2 of 8 DISTRIBUTION PLAN
More informationCase 2:06-cv AB Document 897 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:06-cv-00242-AB Document 897 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CAROL M. MCDONOUGH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TOYS R US, INC., d/b/a
More informationCase 2:10-md CJB-JCW Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 1 of 20. Exhibit 1
Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-JCW Document 25122-2 Filed 10/30/18 Page 1 of 20 Exhibit 1 Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-JCW Document 25122-2 Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
More informationCase 1:11-cv SS Document 274 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:11-cv-01034-SS Document 274 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS KB Partners I, L.P., Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v.
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 226 Filed: 10/30/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:2201
Case: 1:14-cv-03785 Document #: 226 Filed: 10/30/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:2201 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: CIV-MORENO
Case 0:04-cv-60573-FAM Document 2465 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/09/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 04-60573-CIV-MORENO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
More informationCase 1:07-cv RCL Document 66 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 107-cv-01728-RCL Document 66 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
More informationCase 4:10-md BLW-CWD Document 936 Filed 08/22/17 Page 1 of 15
Case 4:10-md-02186-BLW-CWD Document 936 Filed 08/22/17 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: FRESH AND PROCESS POTATOES ANTITRUST LITIGATION Civil
More informationAttorneys for Lead Plaintiffs Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement Fund and Oklahoma Law Enforcement Retirement System
Case :-cv-00-dmg-sh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 WESTERMAN LAW CORP. Jeff S. Westerman (SBN Century Park East, nd Floor Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: (0-0 Fax: (0 0-0 jwesterman@jswlegal.com
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _ PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL : CIVIL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, : ACTION NO. individually and on behalf of all others : 11-CV-00733-WHP similarly
More informationPLAN OF ALLOCATION. 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiff and
PLAN OF ALLOCATION THE DEFINED TERMS 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiff and Defendants dated March 15, 2017 ( Agreement ), except as modified or defined
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:14-cv-01735 Document #: 162 Filed: 08/21/17 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1484 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION HILARY REMIJAS, MELISSA FRANK,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ECF CASE PLAN OF ALLOCATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: All Securities Actions (DeAngelis v. Corzine) Civil Action No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Chapter 13 Trustee Procedures for
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: Chapter 13 Trustee Procedures for Administration of Home Mortgage Payments Chapter 13 Trustee Procedures
More informationOSRAM SYLVANIA AUTOMOTIVE LIGHTING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT (CANADA) CLOSING REPORT
Case History Class action lawsuits claiming that Osram Sylvania, Inc., Osram Sylvania Products, Inc. and Osram Sylvania, Ltd. ("Sylvania") allegedly misrepresented that ce1iain replacement automotive lighting
More informationADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBER LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS:
Free Range Content, Inc. v. Google LLC U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California San Jose Division No. 5:14-cv-02329-BLF Notice to Additional Settlement Class Members of Proposed Settlement
More informationCase 1:05-md JG-JO Document Filed 10/19/12 Page 349 of 379 PageID #: APPENDIX I Plan of Administration and Distribution
Case 1:05-md-01720-JG-JO Document 1656-1 Filed 10/19/12 Page 349 of 379 PageID #: 34860 APPENDIX I Plan of Administration and Distribution I. INTRODUCTION This Plan of Administration and Distribution (
More informationHealthSouth Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State of incorporation or organization)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-A FOR REGISTRATION OF CERTAIN CLASSES OF SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLASS ACTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION In re McKESSON HBOC, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. 99-CV-20743 RMW (PVT)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:06-cv-02163-JLL-MF Document 157 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 3213 Stephen L. Dreyfuss, Esq. Matthew E. Moloshok, Esq. HELLRING LINDEMAN GOLDSTEIN & SIEGAL LLP One Gateway Center Newark, New
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: CIV-MORENO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 04-60573-CIV-MORENO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, vs. Plaintiff, MUTUAL BENEFITS CORP., et al., Defendants. / RECEIVER S MOTION
More informationPLAN OF ALLOCATION. 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiff and
PLAN OF ALLOCATION THE DEFINED TERMS 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiff and Defendants dated March 15, 2017 ( Agreement ), except as modified or defined
More informationCase 1:14-cv IT Document 81-2 Filed 07/21/16 Page 2 of 8 PLAN OF ALLOCATION
Case 1:14-cv-10138-IT Document 81-2 Filed 07/21/16 Page 2 of 8 PLAN OF ALLOCATION 1. The Settlement Fund 1 & Authorized Claimants. The Cash Settlement Amount plus the net proceeds from the Stock Settlement
More informationCase 2:10-md CJB-JCW Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-JCW Document 25122-1 Filed 10/30/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico,
More informationSECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
FINAL SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED MASTER RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A FINANCING PROGRAM FOR BONDS, OTHER PUBLIC SECURITIES AND CREDIT AGREEMENTS SECURED BY AND PAYABLE FROM REVENUE DEPOSITED TO THE CREDIT
More informationCase 2:16-md JLL-JAD Document Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:16-md-02687-JLL-JAD Document 1077-11 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 27807 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY In Re: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION Civil Action
More informationCase 2:12-cv CJB-SS Document 37-1 Filed 02/03/16 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:12-cv-02774-CJB-SS Document 37-1 Filed 02/03/16 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ) CIVIL ACTION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ) ) NUMBER: 2:12-cv-2774
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re CLEARPOINT BUSINESS RESOURCES, INC., et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 10-12037 (Joint Administration Requested) APPLICATION
More informationIn re Commvault Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box Dublin, OH
Must be Postmarked No Later Than June 20, 2018 CMV In re Commvault Systems, Inc Securities Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10521 Dublin, OH 43017-0180 Toll-Free Number: (888) 684-4880 Email: info@commvaultsecuritieslitigationcom
More informationWhereas, CPAAC wishes to assist its member counties in maintaining unemployment coverage, if required, and in reducing the heavy costs thereof; and
TALX CORPORATION UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION SERVICES MODEL AGREEMENT This Agreement is executed on this 1 st day of May 2006, between TALX Corporation, a Missouri corporation, 11432 Lackland Road, St. Louis,
More informationINSTRUCTIONS TO THE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE COMPLETING THE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
EXCHANGE AND TRANSMITTAL INFORMATION BOOKLET FOR SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF FORTIVE CORPORATION I/we, the undersigned, surrender to you for exchange the share(s) of Fortive Corporation ( Fortive ) common
More informationSOLANO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 15/16 04
1 1 1 1 1 1 (SOLANO AND YOLO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA) 1 GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS WHEREAS, a duly called election was held in the Solano Community College District (the District ), Solano County
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS
In re DS Healthcare Group, Inc. Securities Litigation / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-60661-CIV-DIMITROULEAS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION
BTXN222 10/16 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION In re: * Case No.: * Date: * * Chapter 13 Debtor(s) * Last 4 # SSN or TIN: DEBTOR S (S ) CHAPTER 13 PLAN
More informationEBX CLEARLY ERRONEOUS TRADE POLICY
EBX CLEARLY ERRONEOUS TRADE POLICY Date: December 1, 2017 Version: 2.00 Distributed by: ebx, LLC 101 Federal Street, Suite 1010 Boston Massachusetts, 02110 www.levelats.com Document Status: FINAL 1. Introduction
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Case :-cv-0-sjo-ffm Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP DAVID R. ZARO (BAR NO. ) TIM C. HSU (BAR NO. 0) South Figueroa Street, Suite 00 Los Angeles,
More informationCase 2:10-md CJB-SS Document Filed 05/03/12 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT 19
Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 6427-21 Filed 05/03/12 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT 19 Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 6427-21 Filed 05/03/12 Page 2 of 10 EXHIBIT 27 TO DEEPWATER HORIZON ECONOMIC AND PROPERTY
More informationPLAN OF ALLOCATION. 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiffs and
PLAN OF ALLOCATION THE DEFINED TERMS 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiffs and Defendants dated July 30, 2018 ( Agreement ), except as modified or defined
More informationAuthorized to Provide Professional Services to: Debtors and Debtors-in-Possession
Peter D. Doyle Jeffery R. Johnson KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Citicorp Center 153 East 53 rd Street New York, NY 10022-4675 (212) 841-5700 Special Counsel for Genuity Inc., et al., Debtors and Debtors-in-Possession
More informationSCHEDULING COORDINATOR APPLICATION PROTOCOL
FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Original Sheet No. 569 SCHEDULING COORDINATOR APPLICATION PROTOCOL FIRST REPLACEMENT VOLUME NO. II Original Sheet No. 570 SCHEDULING COORDINATOR APPLICATION PROTOCOL Table
More informationmg Doc Filed 10/31/18 Entered 10/31/18 16:01:18 Main Document Pg 1 of 13
Pg 1 of 13 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas, 41st Floor New York, NY 136-2714 Tel: (212) 248-314 Fax: (212) 248-3141 Kristin K. Going Marita S. Erbeck E-mail: kristin.going@dbr.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-gpc-jma Document - Filed 0/0/ PageID.00 Page of 0 0 ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP DAVID R. ZARO (BAR NO. ) South Figueroa Street, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00- Phone:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE: SUNEDISON, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION DARCY CHURCH, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. AHMAD R.
More informationmg Doc Filed 10/26/16 Entered 10/26/16 17:01:41 Main Document Pg 1 of 32. In re Motors Liquidation Company, et al.
Pg 1 of 32 Matthew J. Williams Direct: +1 212.351.2322 Fax: +1 212.351.5232 mjwilliams@gibsondunn.com In re Motors Liquidation Company, et al. 09-50026-mg Doc 13780 Filed 10/26/16 Entered 10/26/16 17:01:41
More informationWHEREAS, VDOT is the owner and operator of the Virginia E-ZPass Toll Collection System;
This ELECTRONIC TOLL COLLECTION (ETC) AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is made and entered into this 19th day of December 2007, by and between VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ( VDOT ) and CAPITAL BELTWAY
More informationGTAT Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box Dublin, OH
Must be Postmarked No Later Than July 12, 2018 GTAT Securities Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10463 Dublin, OH 43017-4063 1-866-562-8790 info@gtatsecuritieslitigationcom wwwgtatsecuritieslitigationcom GTS *P-GTS-POC/1*
More informationCase hdh11 Doc 382 Filed 02/03/17 Entered 02/03/17 18:12:48 Page 193 of 231
Case 16-34393-hdh11 Doc 382 Filed 02/03/17 Entered 02/03/17 18:12:48 Page 193 of 231 I. Introduction RIGHTS OFFERING PROCEDURES The Debtors are pursuing a proposed plan of reorganization (the Plan ) under
More informationmg Doc 6556 Filed 03/03/14 Entered 03/03/14 14:54:50 Main Document Pg 1 of 30. L. Stephens Tilghman Hearing Date: T.B.D.
Pg 1 of 30 L. Tilghman Hearing Date: T.B.D. Tilghman & Co., P.C. Objection Deadline: T.B.D. P.O. Box 11250 (3415 Independence Drive, Suite 102) Birmingham, Alabama 35202 (35209) Telephone: (205) 414-1470
More informationCase 1:05-md JG-JO Document Filed 04/11/13 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 48850
Case 1:05-md-01720-JG-JO Document 2112-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 48850 I. INTRODUCTION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PLAN OF ADMINISTRATION AND DISTRIBUTION Pursuant to page 7 of
More informationIn Re: CDS Antitrust Litigation. Overview of Plan for Distributing the Settlement Fund to Claimants
Overview of Plan for Distributing the Settlement Fund to Claimants 1. The Net Settlement Fund (that is, the $1,864,650,000 fund including any interest earned and net of any Court-approved attorneys fees,
More informationINDENTURE OF TRUST. Dated as of May 1, between the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKEPORT. and. UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A.
Jones Hall A Professional Law Corporation Execution Copy INDENTURE OF TRUST Dated as of May 1, 2008 between the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LAKEPORT and UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A., as Trustee
More informationPLAN OF ALLOCATION. 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiffs and
PLAN OF ALLOCATION THE DEFINED TERMS 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiffs and Settling Defendants ( Agreement ), except as modified or defined herein, apply
More informationAPV c/o GCG P.O. Box 10436
Must be Postmarked No Later Than August 7, 2018 Allergan Proxy Violation Securities Litigation APV c/o GCG PO Box 10436 *P-APV-POC/1* Dublin, OH 43017-4036 Toll-Free Number: (855) 474-3851 Email: info@allerganproxyviolationsecuritieslitigationcom
More informationAmendment to the Vanguard Brokerage Account Agreement
Amendment to the Vanguard Brokerage Account Agreement Effective October 21, 2013 Please read this important information carefully. This Amendment updates the terms and conditions of your Vanguard Brokerage
More informationCase hdh11 Doc 69 Filed 11/03/17 Entered 11/03/17 18:59:23 Page 1 of 48
Case 17-33964-hdh11 Doc 69 Filed 11/03/17 Entered 11/03/17 18:59:23 Page 1 of 48 Gregory G. Hesse (Texas Bar No. 09549419) HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP 1445 Ross Avenue Suite 3700 Dallas, Texas 75209 Telephone:
More informationLast Name (Company) First Name SSN Disbursement % Mailing Address City State Zip
Account Servicing Agreement Allegro Escrow Services, a Division of Evergreen Note Servicing (hereinafter referred to as Servicer ), is hereby directed to establish a servicing account on behalf of the
More informationNOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT & FINAL APPROVAL HEARING
NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT & FINAL APPROVAL HEARING Araiza, et al v. The Scotts Company, LLC, Case No. BC570350 Gonzalez v. The Scotts Company, LLC, Case No. BC577875 SUPERIOR
More informationCase 1:96-cv TFH-GMH Document 4317 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case :9-cv-08-TFH-GMH Document 7 Filed /8/7 Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELOUISE PEPION COBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RYAN ZINKE, Secretary of the Interior,
More informationPROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM
Must be Postmarked No Later Than February 20, 2018 CBP *P-CBP-POC/1* In re CTI BioPharma Corp Securities Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 35100 Seattle, WA 98124-1100 Toll-Free Number: (844) 402-8599 Email: info@ctibiopharmasecuritiessettlementcom
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Dated May 19, by and between MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED. and HEARTLAND PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
Exhibit 10.1 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Dated May 19, 2010 by and between MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED and HEARTLAND PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DEFINITIONS; CERTAIN RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. NOTICE FOR DISTRIBUTION OF THE SEC v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION FAIR FUND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, Defendant. CASE NOS.: 09 Civ. 6829 (JSR) 10 Civ. 0215 (JSR) NOTICE
More informationExhibit C Rights Offering Procedures, 1145 Beneficial Holder Subscription Form, and Master 1145 Subscription Form
Case 17-30560 Document 825-3 Filed in TXSB on 05/29/17 Page 1 of 45 Exhibit C-1 1145 Rights Offering Procedures, 1145 Beneficial Holder Subscription Form, and Master 1145 Subscription Form Case 17-30560
More informationNOTICE AND INSTRUCTION FORM 1
NOTICE AND INSTRUCTION FORM 1 to the Holders (the Pre-Petition Noteholders ) of the 10-1/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2022 (CUSIP Nos. 00214T AA 6 and U04695 AA 7) (the Subordinated Notes ) issued
More informationsmb Doc Filed 02/13/19 Entered 02/13/19 17:48:46 Main Document Pg 1 of 3
Pg 1 of 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Applicant, v. BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Adv. Pro. No. 08-01789
More informationIN THE BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Chapter 11. Chapter 11
IN THE BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: W.S. LEE & SONS, INC. Debtor-in-Possession. BANKRUPTCY NO. 06-70148 Chapter 11 IN RE: LEE SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS, INC. Debtor-in-Possession.
More informationRe Cash Store Financial Services Court File No. CV CL. and
Re Cash Store Financial Services Court File No. CV-14-10518-00CL Fortier v The Cash Store Financial Services Inc. et al Court File No. CV-13-481943-00CP PLAN OF ALLOCATION Distribution of Class Compensation
More informationDESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO
DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 111815-4 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF THE DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT (RIVERSIDE AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA) 2016 GENERAL OBLIGATION
More informationPROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM
In re Conn s, Inc. Securities Litigation c/o Epiq Global P.O. Box 4087 Portland, OR 97208-4087 Toll-Free Number: (855) 804-8547 Email: info@connssecuritieslitigation.com Settlement Website: www.connssecuritieslitigation.com
More informationKatharine B. Gresham (pro hac vice pending) Hearing Date: February 2, 2010
Katharine B. Gresham (pro hac vice pending) Hearing Date: February 2, 2010 Securities and Exchange Commission Hearing Time: 10:00 a.m 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20548 Telephone: (202) 551-5148
More informationPROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM
Must be Postmarked No Later Than April 27, 2016 New York State Teachers Retirement System v General Motors Company c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10262 Dublin, OH 43017-5762 1-866-459-1720 wwwgmsecuritieslitigationcom
More information