Case 3:11-cv GPC-KSC Document Filed 04/24/17 PageID Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT E EXHIBIT E
|
|
- Geraldine Ellis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 3:11-cv GPC-KSC Document Filed 04/24/17 PageID Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT E EXHIBIT E
2 Case 3:11-cv GPC-KSC Document Filed 04/24/17 PageID Page 2 of 8 DISTRIBUTION PLAN Beaver, et al. v. Tarsadia Hotels, et al. The Net Settlement Fund, which consists of the money remaining after attorneys fees and costs, Settlement Administration Costs, and service awards are deducted, will be distributed to Class members pursuant to the following Distribution Plan. The basic methodology is to first calculate the pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund for each unit owned by one or more members of the Class, and then, if there is more than one owner, determine how that amount should be allocated among the owners. Generally, the pro rata shares are determined based on the original purchase price and either the current value of the unit if still owned, or what the Class member(s) received when the unit was sold or lost in foreclosure. More specifically: Step One Appraise Each Unit Still Owned: For Class members who still own their units, the Distribution Plan requires that the current value of the units be known. See Step Two, infra. The appraisals would be completed within forty-five (45) days of the Preliminary Approval Order, and posted on a website maintained by the Settlement Administrator. Step Two Calculate the Estimated GPR for each Unit Owned by a Class Member: Within 15 days after the Effective Date, the Settlement Administrator will calculate the estimated Gross Potential Restitution, or GPR, for each unit purchased by a Class member (or group of Class members). The GPR is calculated as follows for the three categories of units purchased by Class members: For units still owned, the GPR is the difference between the original purchase price and its current value, as appraised per Step One above; For units sold by a Class member (or group of Class members), the GPR is the difference between the original purchase price and the resale price, as recorded by the San Diego County Assessor/Recorder; and 1
3 Case 3:11-cv GPC-KSC Document Filed 04/24/17 PageID Page 3 of 8 For units lost to foreclosure, 1 the GPR is the difference between the original purchase price and the loan balance discharged in foreclosure, which the Settlement Administrator shall presume to be the loan amount as recorded by the San Diego County Assessor/Recorder on the theory that most or all the payments went to interest rather than principal. Pursuant to Step Three below, any Class member affected by this presumption may submit documentation demonstrating that the amount of the loan discharged through foreclosure was less. Step Three Letter Summarizing Settlement Calculation Inputs: Within fifteen (15) days of the completion of Step Two, the Settlement Administrator will send each member of the Class a letter summarizing the values or inputs to be used to calculate the amount of restitution for each unit they own, 2 as well as any other determinations to be made by the Settlement Administrator. See Klier v. Elf Atochem N. Am., Inc., 658 F.3d 468, 480 (5th Cir. 2011) (allocation plan may be based on a formula). Where a unit is owned by more than one member of the Class, this letter will also identify the Settlement Administrator s determination of each Class member s percentage of ownership, if known. These percentages will be used in all distribution checks unless corrected as provided below. If the respective percentages of ownership are not known, the Settlement Administrator will request that the Class members submit appropriate documentation reflecting each owner s share of the unit. If the Class members fail to respond, any distribution checks issued by the Settlement Administrator shall be issued in the name of all co-purchasers. If a unit was purchased by an entity such as a Limited Liability Company, the Class member is the entity and the settlement check(s) will be made out to the entity. Also, with the exception of Mixed Units 3, if a unit 1 Class members who voluntarily returned the deed to their unit in lieu of foreclosure will be treated as if they foreclosed. 2 The Settlement Administrator may rely on the initial grant deeds to identify the original purchasers. 3 Mixed Units refers to units purchased by multiple Persons, where one or more of the purchasers, but not all, were either a named plaintiff in Salameh or signed the Settlement Agreement And Mutual Release in Bell. 2
4 Case 3:11-cv GPC-KSC Document Filed 04/24/17 PageID Page 4 of 8 was purchased by a married couple, then the settlement check(s) will be made out to both spouses. Letters sent to co-purchasers of Mixed Units who are Class members (because they were not named plaintiffs in Salameh, and did not sign the release in Bell) will be similar, except that the letter will make clear that the co-purchaser(s) excluded based on Salameh and/or Bell will not receive a share of the Settlement. The amount of the Net Settlement Fund distributed for a Mixed Unit will be reduced by the excluded purchaser s percentage of ownership. Where one purchasing spouse is excluded from the Class based on Salameh and/or Bell, and the other is not, the spouse who is a member of the Class is entitled to one half of what would have been awarded to the couple but for the other spouse s exclusion pursuant to Salameh and/or Bell. The letter will advise Class members that they have thirty (30) days (as determined by the postmarks) to submit by mail written documentation correcting or challenging any input, value, or determination relevant to the allocation, except that the current appraised value of a unit (which is relevant to those who still own their units) may not be contested. The Settlement Administrator will send a reminder to those Class members who do not respond, providing them an additional thirty (30) days to respond. If no response is received, then the inputs, values, and other determinations summarized in the letter will be used to calculate distributions. The Settlement Administrator will have discretion to change any input, value, or determination if the Class member timely submits documentation that clearly demonstrates that the change is appropriate, with the exception that appraisal values cannot be challenged. See Newberg on Class Actions, 12:22 ( The administrator is often charged by the settlement agreement (and the court) with reviewing and approving or rejecting claims ); Manual for Complex Litigation, (4th ed.) ( The administrator or special master may be charged with reviewing the claims and deciding whether to allow claims that are late, deficient in documentation, or questionable for other reasons ). The Class member may appeal these determinations before the Special Master referenced in Step Seven below by notifying the Settlement Administrator of his/her/its decision to do so in writing within fifteen (15) days of the decision on the contested input, value, or determination by the Settlement Administrator. See Newberg on Class Actions, 12:22 3
5 Case 3:11-cv GPC-KSC Document Filed 04/24/17 PageID Page 5 of 8 ( Similarly, the Settlement Agreement may, though it need not, set forth a procedure for appealing the administrator s determinations ). The Settlement Administrator will advise Class members who so appeal that they have thirty (30) days to submit a writing summarizing the basis for their appeal, along with supporting documentation, to the Settlement Administrator. The Settlement Administrator will promptly provide copies of such appeals to the Parties and to the Special Master. The Settlement Administrator may also use this letter to disclose such other determinations, or request such other information as it deems appropriate, such as information to be submitted if an individual Class member is deceased, or if an entity Class member has been dissolved. Class Counsel will file a status report once the deadline for appeals in Step Three has expired. Step Four Calculate Estimated Proportionate Share for each Unit: Next, the Settlement Administrator will calculate an estimated Proportionate Share for each such unit by dividing that particular unit s estimated GPR by the aggregate sum of the estimated GPRs for all units owned by Class members. This yields a percentage that will be used in the next two steps. Step Five Determine Amount Available for Initial Distribution: The exact amount each Class member is entitled to receive cannot be determined until the following things are known: (a) all Settlement Administration costs; and (b) whether any appeals of input determinations by the Settlement Administrator succeed. To mitigate the potential hardship that could arise if payments are delayed until these things are known, the Distribution Plan provides for an initial distribution to Class members who have not appealed any determinations of the Settlement Administrator. For those Class members who have not appealed a determination by the Settlement Administrator and own their unit with other Class members, an initial distribution will only be possible where the percentages of ownership are known. The Settlement Administrator will not send an initial distribution to a Class member if the Settlement Administrator cannot determine a minimum amount to which the Class member is entitled. To calculate how much can be safely distributed in initial distributions, the Settlement Administrator will first deduct attorneys fees 4
6 Case 3:11-cv GPC-KSC Document Filed 04/24/17 PageID Page 6 of 8 and costs, service awards, and previously incurred Settlement Administration Costs from the Settlement Fund, and then determine how much more of the Settlement Fund should be held in reserve to cover: (a) additional Settlement Administration Costs; (b) possible increases in GPRs for units owned by Class members who appeal the Settlement Administrator s determination of contested inputs; (c) an additional reserve of 20% of the Net Settlement Fund for unexpected contingencies; and (d) any other amounts that the Settlement Administrator or Class Counsel reasonably believe are appropriate in light of the circumstances. At the same time, Class Counsel will file a status report outlining not only the amount so reserved and how that reserve was calculated, but also the overall status of the Distribution Plan. Step Six Initial Distribution: For each unit owned by a Class member or members entitled to receive an initial distribution, the Settlement Administrator will calculate the amount of that distribution by multiplying (a) the estimated Proportionate Share for that unit, and (b) the amount of the remaining Settlement Fund not held in reserve pursuant to Step Five. The Settlement Administrator shall distribute these checks to the owners of those units according to their respective percentages of ownership. This shall be done not less than fifteen (15) nor more than forty-five (45) days after the filing of the status report mentioned in Step Five. The initial distribution (Steps Five and Six) may be skipped if there are no appeals to the Special Master, or the Settlement Administrator in consultation with Class Counsel deems it appropriate based on the likelihood that the Special Master will quickly resolve the remaining issues. In that event, the Settlement Administrator will proceed to Steps Eight and Nine (after remaining issues are resolved). The Settlement Administrator, with the approval of Class Counsel, may: (a) require Class members to sign a form certifying certain representations before receiving distribution checks, such as that the Class member knows of no other recipients entitled to those funds; or (b) add language to distribution checks stating that the recipient makes certain certified representations by depositing the check. Step Seven The Special Master: A Special Master appointed by the Parties will resolve any appeals provided for in Step Three. The Special Master shall affirm the determination of the Settlement Administrator unless 5
7 Case 3:11-cv GPC-KSC Document Filed 04/24/17 PageID Page 7 of 8 the Class member clearly demonstrates error. The Special Master will make his or her determinations based on the written submissions submitted by the Class member to the Settlement Administrator, without other submissions or proceedings unless the Special Master orders otherwise. All determinations made by the Special Master in such appeals shall be final and binding. Newberg on Class Actions, 12:22 ( Similarly, the Settlement Agreement may, though it need not, set forth a procedure for appealing the administrator s determinations ); see also In re Sulzer Orthopedics and Knee Prosthesis Products Liability Litigation, 398 F.3d 782 (6 th Cir. 2005). If the need arises, the Special Master will determine whether a particular person is or is not a member of the Class according to procedures the Special Master deems appropriate. Any such determinations by the Special Master will be subject to de novo review by the District Court. See Catholic Social Services, Inc. v. Chertoff, 2008 WL , *2 (E.D. Cal. 2008) (holding due process requires de novo review of special master s determination that individual was not a member of the settlement class). To avoid significant delays in providing settlement benefits to members of the Class, the Settlement Administrator, in consultation with Class Counsel and with advance notice to the Parties and the District Court, may make one or more interim distributions using the methodology described in Steps Five and Six above. The Special Master will be paid from the Settlement Fund per the terms set forth in the Settlement Agreement and these costs will be considered part of the costs of administering the Settlement. Step Eight Calculate Final GPR and Proportionate Share for each Unit: Once final determinations are made on all disputed issues submitted to the Special Master, and once any permissible appeals to the District Court are resolved, Class Counsel will submit another status report to the District Court that summarizes the determinations made and how they will affect the Settlement, and the Settlement Administrator shall recalculate the GPRs and Proportionate Shares for each unit to the extent necessary. Step Nine Final Distribution: Finally, the Settlement Administrator will assess the remaining Settlement Administration Costs, and thereby finally determine the exact value of the Net Settlement Fund. Using the final Proportionate Share for each unit purchased by a Class 6
8 Case 3:11-cv GPC-KSC Document Filed 04/24/17 PageID Page 8 of 8 member(s), the Settlement Administrator will then calculate the value of the portion of the Net Settlement Fund that should be allocated to each unit, and then mail final distribution checks to Class members that account for any previous distributions. If any settlement checks are uncashed after ninety (90) days or undeliverable, the Settlement Administrator will make additional reasonable efforts to distribute those funds, which depending on the circumstances could include the hiring of private investigators to locate Class members if less expensive methods fail. Class Counsel will be involved in the decision to hire a private investigator, the selection thereof, and oversight of the investigation. Here, aggressive measures to locate all Class members are warranted because of the relatively small size of the Settlement Class and the relatively large size of each member s share of the Net Settlement Fund. If all reasonable efforts are exhausted, any uncashed or undeliverable amounts, as well as any left over Settlement Administration costs, shall be distributed pro rata to Class members who cashed their checks, unless Plaintiffs Counsel, with District Court approval, deems the residual too small to efficiently distribute, in which event the residual will be paid cy pres to an appropriate charity or non-profit suggested by Plaintiffs and approved by the District Court. Lane v. Facebook, Inc., 696 F.3d 811, 819 (9th Cir. 2012) (the cy pres doctrine allows a court to distribute unclaimed or non-distributable portions of a class action settlement fund to the next best class of beneficiaries ). 7
PLAN OF ALLOCATION. 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiff and
PLAN OF ALLOCATION THE DEFINED TERMS 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiff and Defendants dated March 15, 2017 ( Agreement ), except as modified or defined
More informationPLAN OF ALLOCATION. 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiff and
PLAN OF ALLOCATION THE DEFINED TERMS 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiff and Defendants dated March 15, 2017 ( Agreement ), except as modified or defined
More informationARTICLES OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
ARTICLES OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR FINANCIAL PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY-NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION. Specimen documents are made available for educational purposes only. This specimen form may be given to
More informationCase 1:05-md JG-JO Document Filed 10/19/12 Page 349 of 379 PageID #: APPENDIX I Plan of Administration and Distribution
Case 1:05-md-01720-JG-JO Document 1656-1 Filed 10/19/12 Page 349 of 379 PageID #: 34860 APPENDIX I Plan of Administration and Distribution I. INTRODUCTION This Plan of Administration and Distribution (
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RICARDO SANCHEZ, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, CASE NO. CIVDS1702554 v. Plaintiffs, NOTICE
More informationSUMMARY OF YOUR OPTIONS AND THE LEGAL EFFECT OF EACH OPTION APPROVE THE
Manwaring v. The Golden 1 Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD A CHECKING
More informationPLAN OF ALLOCATION. 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiffs and
PLAN OF ALLOCATION THE DEFINED TERMS 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiffs and Defendants dated July 30, 2018 ( Agreement ), except as modified or defined
More informationCase 3:14-cv JAG-RCY Document 218 Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 9162
Case 3:14-cv-00682-JAG-RCY Document 218 Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 9162 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION IN RE GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION
More informationMASTER PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION AND ADMINISTRATION IN THE MATTER OF THE DPM SECURITIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CLASS ACTION LITIGATION
MASTER PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION AND ADMINISTRATION IN THE MATTER OF THE DPM SECURITIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CLASS ACTION LITIGATION GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF THE ADMINISTRATION 1. The procedures set forth herein
More informationCase 1:05-cv JSR Document 851 Filed 06/18/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:05-cv-08626-JSR Document 851 Filed 06/18/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------- x : : In re REFCO,
More informationCase 3:14-cv JAG-RCY Document Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 9155
Case 3:14-cv-00682-JAG-RCY Document 217-2 Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 9155 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION IN RE GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC., SECURITIES
More informationPLAN OF ALLOCATION. 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiffs and
PLAN OF ALLOCATION THE DEFINED TERMS 1. The definitions set out in the settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiffs and Settling Defendants ( Agreement ), except as modified or defined herein, apply
More informationCase 2:08-cv ES-JAD Document 454 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 28178
,day Case 2:08-cv-00397-ES-JAD Document 454 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 28178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION / ENHANCE SECURIflES LITIGATION
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL
OF PROPOSED CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL Bromberg v. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and FIS Management Services, LLC, United States District
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT YOU MAY BE REQUIRED TO FILE A CLAIM FORM. NOT ALL CLASS MEMBERS ARE REQUIRED TO FILE A CLAIM FORM.
The Superior Court of the State of California authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you are a lawyer or law firm that has paid,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Wornicki, et al. v. Brokerpriceopinion.com, et al. Case No. 1:13-CV PAB-KMT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Wornicki, et al. v. Brokerpriceopinion.com, et al. Case No. 1:13-CV-03258-PAB-KMT If you have completed broker price opinions on behalf of Brokerpriceopinion.com,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:06-cv-02163-JLL-MF Document 157 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 3213 Stephen L. Dreyfuss, Esq. Matthew E. Moloshok, Esq. HELLRING LINDEMAN GOLDSTEIN & SIEGAL LLP One Gateway Center Newark, New
More informationCLAIM FORM PACKAGE. Detour Gold Corporation Securities Litigation
Claim Form must be postmarked or emailed or submitted online by 11:59 pm on September 29, 2017 CLAIM FORM PACKAGE Revised as of July 14, 2017 Detour Gold Corporation Securities Litigation Martin Gerard
More informationQUALIFIED DOMESTIC RELATIONS ORDERS
QUALIFIED DOMESTIC RELATIONS ORDERS The Retirement Equity Act of 1984 established a specific set of rules under which pension benefits can be paid to an alternate payee (a former spouse for dependent child)
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST MICHELLE COX, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; MARYANNE TIERRA, individually and on behalf
More informationCase 1:04-cv LTS-HBP Document 746 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-09866-LTS-HBP Document 746 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE PFIZER INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 04-cv-9866 (LTS)(HBP) ECF CASE
More informationCase 2:08-cv MJP Document 329 Filed 09/10/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :0-cv-00-MJP Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOANNE BERGEN, ANDREW C. MATTELIANO, NANCY A. MATTELIANO, KEVIN KARLSON, BARBARA KARLSON, ROBERT BRADSHAW, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly
More informationmg Doc Filed 02/13/17 Entered 02/13/17 20:23:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 23. Attorneys for the Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust
Pg 1 of 23 Attorneys for the Motors Liquidation CompanyGUC Trust et al. et al. Pg 2 of 23 Attorneys for the Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust Pg 3 of 23 Pg 4 of 23 Pg 5 of 23 Pg 6 of 23 Motors Liquidation
More informationAttorneys for Lead Plaintiffs Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement Fund and Oklahoma Law Enforcement Retirement System
Case :-cv-00-dmg-sh Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 WESTERMAN LAW CORP. Jeff S. Westerman (SBN Century Park East, nd Floor Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: (0-0 Fax: (0 0-0 jwesterman@jswlegal.com
More informationCase 1:11-cv CM Document 79 Filed 11/07/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT NEW YORK
Case 1:11-cv-08331-CM Document 79 Filed 11/07/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT NEW YORK PAUL SHAPIRO, on behalf of himself as an individual, and on behalf of all others similarly
More informationCase 1:05-md JG-JO Document Filed 04/11/13 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 48850
Case 1:05-md-01720-JG-JO Document 2112-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 48850 I. INTRODUCTION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PLAN OF ADMINISTRATION AND DISTRIBUTION Pursuant to page 7 of
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants.
2:06-cv-15601-GER-DAS Doc ## 975 975 Filed 06/07/16 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 45652 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PAT CASON-MERENDA and JEFFREY A. SUHRE on behalf of
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL
ATTENTION: NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL BANK BRANCH STORE MANAGERS EMPLOYED BY WELLS FARGO BANK, NA ( DEFENDANT ) WHO: WORKED IN A LEVEL 1
More informationQDRO Procedures for Laborers District Council and Contractors Pension Fund of Ohio
QDRO Procedures for Laborers District Council and Contractors Pension Fund of Ohio 1. Definitions: Accrued Benefit The amount of retirement income payable at normal retirement age (calculated as a Regular
More informationThis Opinion and Order / Relates to ORDER APPROVING DISTRIBUTION PLAN FOR THE NET SETTLEMENT FUNDS
Case 2:05-md-01725-GER Document 495 Filed 07/09/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE: DELPHI CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, MDL No. 1725
More informationORDER OF THE COURT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; SETTLEMENT HEARING; AND CLAIM AND EXCLUSION PROCEDURES
ORDER OF THE COURT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; SETTLEMENT HEARING; AND CLAIM AND EXCLUSION PROCEDURES Jose H. Solano et al. v. Kavlico Corporation, et al. Ventura County Superior Court
More informationCase 1:90-cv JLK Document 2537 Filed 11/06/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:90-cv-00181-JLK Document 2537 Filed 11/06/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 90-cv-00181-JLK MERILYN COOK, et al., v.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
0 0 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ACTION REQUIRED A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. The records of tenancy indicate that YOU are
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION BULK SETTLEMENT PRACTICE
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-15098 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION In the Matter of CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC; DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.; CREDIT
More informationTexas Instruments, Inc. Qualified Domestic Relations Order Procedures. Updated June, 2014
Texas Instruments, Inc. Qualified Domestic Relations Order Procedures Updated June, 2014 Table of Contents PAGE Introduction... 1 Section I Definitions... 1 Section II Designated Representatives... 3 Section
More informationCase No. LACV Plaintiffs, GRAIN PROCESSING CORPORATION, Defendant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA IN AND FOR MUSCATINE COUNTY LAURIE FREEMAN, SHARON MOCKMORE, BECCY BOYSEL, GARY D. BOYSEL, LINDA L. GOREHAM, GARY R. GOREHAM, KELCEY BRACKETT and BOBBIE LYNN
More informationCase 8:07-cv VMC-EAJ Document 290 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6389 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:07-cv-01940-VMC-EAJ Document 290 Filed 04/24/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6389 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION EASTWOOD ENTERPRISES, LLC, Individually and on Behalf
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Thomas Pazo, individually and on behalf of all others individually situated, Plaintiff, vs. Incredible Adventures, Inc., a California
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (BALTIMORE DIVISION) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (BALTIMORE DIVISION ARLENE HODGES, CAROLYN MILLER and GARY T. BROWN, on behalf of themselves, individually, and on behalf of the Bon Secours Plans,
More informationQUIGLEY COMPANY, INC. ASBESTOS PI TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES SECTION I. Introduction
Conformed Copy QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC. ASBESTOS PI TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES The QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC. ASBESTOS PI TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES ( Asbestos TDP ) contained herein provide for resolving
More informationQUIGLEY COMPANY, INC. ASBESTOS PI TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES SECTION I. Introduction
Conformed Copy QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC. ASBESTOS PI TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES The QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC. ASBESTOS PI TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES ( Asbestos TDP ) contained herein provide for resolving
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
TINA ZAWISLAK, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY Plaintiff, vs. NO. 110303622 BENEFICIAL SAVINGS BANK, Defendant. CLASS ACTION NOTICE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-gpc-jma Document - Filed 0/0/ PageID.00 Page of 0 0 ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP DAVID R. ZARO (BAR NO. ) South Figueroa Street, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00- Phone:
More informationYOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:
OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT & DECEMBER 17, 2014 FAIRNESS HEARING Chris Lange, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Ricoh Americas Corporation, a New York Corporation,
More informationHow to Complete the New SBA 7(a) Litigation 7 Tab Package SOP (Effective Date: March 1, 2013)
How to Complete the New SBA 7(a) Litigation 7 Tab Package SOP 50 57 (Effective Date: March 1, 2013) The United States Small Business Administration ( SBA ), in SOP 50 57 ( SOP ), recently promulgated Litigation
More informationSTATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF BERNALILLO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT. Plaintiff, Case No. CV
STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF BERNALILLO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SHAWN V. MILLS, for himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, Case No. CV 2003-01471 ZURICH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationWORKWEEK DISPUTE FORM
WORKWEEK DISPUTE FORM CPT ID: «ID» SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO James v. Park N Fly Service, LLC et al. Case No. 17CIV05465 CPT ID: 1 *1* Aanenson, Taylor Alan
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-16757 : In the Matter of : : Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC : and Citigroup Global Markets
More informationCase 1:12-cv AT Document 105 Filed 11/24/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:12-cv-04199-AT Document 105 Filed 11/24/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE KIT DIGITAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 12-CV-4199 (AT) LEAD
More informationInformation & Instructions: Demand letter opportunity to cure and intent to accelerate the note
Information & Instructions: Demand letter opportunity to cure and intent to accelerate the note 1. The demand letter in the form that follows is used to advise the debtor that he or she is delinquent in
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KEVIN KNOX; NOE BAROCIO; SALVADOR BAROCIO; CINDY CONYBEAR, each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, Master
More informationAMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS AND EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND Procedures for Determining the Qualified Status of a State Domestic Relations Order
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS AND EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND Procedures for Determining the Qualified Status of a State Domestic Relations Order Under current law, the American Federation of Musicians and
More informationCase 1:08-cv TPG Document 1091 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:08-cv-11117-TPG Document 1091 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE TREMONT SECURITIES LAW, STATE LAW AND INSURANCE LITIGATION
More informationAmendment No. 2 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GATEWAY CITIES COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AND THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL
Amendment No. 2 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GATEWAY CITIES COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AND THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION AND COST SHARING OF THE COORDINATED MONITORING PLAN FOR
More informationSupersedes All Pages of S.O.P. No. HED Effective 09/25/2006
Page 1 of 11 I. PURPOSE The Massachusetts Department of Transportation ( MassDOT ) shall follow a formal Cost Recovery Procedure to improve the quality of its projects. This procedure supersedes the 2006
More informationCase 2:16-md JLL-JAD Document Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:16-md-02687-JLL-JAD Document 1077-11 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 27807 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY In Re: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION Civil Action
More information*Barcode39* - <<SequenceNo>>
MOORE V HCA C/O RUST CONSULTING INC 5114 PO BOX 2396 FARIBAULT MN 55021-9096 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *Barcode39* -
More informationWESTERN STATES OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND WITHDRAWAL LIABILITY POLICY
WESTERN STATES OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND WITHDRAWAL LIABILITY POLICY EFFECTIVE: JULY 1, 2014 1. Policy Adoption... 4 1.1 Statement of Purpose... 4 1.2 Statement of Authority... 4 1.3
More informationmg Doc Filed 11/13/18 Entered 11/13/18 18:29:24 Main Document Pg 1 of 22
Pg 1 of 22 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas, 41st Floor New York, NY 10036-2714 Tel: (212) 248-3140 Fax: (212) 248-3141 Kristin K. Going Marita S. Erbeck E-mail: kristin.going@dbr.com
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY JORGE TRELLES v. STEPHENS INSTITUTE DBA ACADEMY OF ART UNIVERSITY CASE NOS. CGC-10-497727; CGC-11-509952 NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION
More informationATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS, ROBERT AGUIRRE, IRVING BEL TRAN, JAKE SERENO, 5 RONALD BEREND, KEITH BISPO
.. ~ I 1 EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS GROUP KARL GERBER (SBN 166003) 2 13418 VENTURA BLVD. SHERMAN OAKS, CA. 91423 3 TELEPHONE: (818) 783-7300 FACSIMILE: (818) 995-7159 4 '-bonformed COPY ORIGINAL PILED Superior
More informationCase 1:13-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:13-cv-05238-NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MARY ANNE CAPRIO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
More informationTHE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY ASBESTOS PI SETTLEMENT TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES. Revised December 2, 2015
EXHIBIT B TO PLAN ASBESTOS PI TDP THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY ASBESTOS PI SETTLEMENT TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES Revised December 2, 2015 Revised 12/2/15 THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY ASBESTOS PI SETTLEMENT
More informationTHE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE YOLO COUNTY PUBLIC AGENCY RISK MANAGEMENT INSURANCE AUTHORITY THIS AMENDED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (Agreement) is dated and will be effective as of July 1, 1990;
More informationCase BLS Doc 615 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
Case 16-11084-BLS Doc 615 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: DNIB UNWIND, INC. (f/k/a BIND THERAPEUTICS, INC.), Post-Effective Debtor.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re: INFOSONICS SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 06-CV-1231-JLS (WMC) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: JUDGE: Honorable
More informationLaborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California 220 Campus Lane, Fairfield, CA Telephone: (707) Toll Free: 1-(800)
Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California Campus Lane, Fairfield, CA - Telephone: (0) -00 Toll Free: 1-(00) -0 INFORMATION FOR DRAFTING A QDRO DIVIDING COMMUNITY PROPERTY INTERESTS IN THE LABORERS
More informationCASE 0:14-md PAM Document Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT 1
CASE 0:14-md-02522-PAM Document 483-1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT 1 CASE 0:14-md-02522-PAM Document 483-1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 2 of 14 EXHIBIT 1 SUMMARY OF DATA BREACH SETTLEMENTS Monetary Value
More informationADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBER LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS:
Free Range Content, Inc. v. Google LLC U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California San Jose Division No. 5:14-cv-02329-BLF Notice to Additional Settlement Class Members of Proposed Settlement
More informationModel Eligible (Pre-retirement) Domestic Relations Order Kent County Employees Retirement Plan
This model domestic relations order is provided to assist attorneys for participants and alternate payees in assigning benefits of the Kent County Employees Retirement Plan in connection with a divorce.
More informationAPPENDIX I PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION ANNUAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND OPERATING DATA REPORT
APPENDIX I PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION ANNUAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND OPERATING DATA REPORT PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION ANNUAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND OPERATING DATA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Index No x.
Case 1:18-cv-06448 Document 1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Index No. 18-6448 ---------------------------------------------------------x VINCENT
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _ PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL : CIVIL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, : ACTION NO. individually and on behalf of all others : 11-CV-00733-WHP similarly
More informationPROBATING A VERMONT ESTATE *Rules and statutes are subject to change. This information is intended as a guide only*
PROBATING A VERMONT ESTATE *Rules and statutes are subject to change. This information is intended as a guide only* This Summary is designed to help you carry out your duties as an executor or administrator
More informationAN ESTIMATE OF YOUR SHARE OF THE SETTLEMENT IS SET FORTH ON THE GREEN CLAIM FORM.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT LAWRENCE WEINSTEIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No.: CV-12-448410-00CP BETWEEN: AFA LIVFÖRSÄKRINGSAKTIEBOLAG, AFA SJUKFÖRSÄKRINGSAKTIEBOLAG, AFA TRYGGHETSFÖRSÄKRINGSAKTIEBOLAG, KOLLEKTIVAVTALSSTIFTELSEN TRYGGHETSFONDEN
More informationCOLLECTION POLICY FOR DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS CATHEDRAL VILLAS OWNERS ASSOCIATION
COLLECTION POLICY FOR DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS * CATHEDRAL VILLAS OWNERS ASSOCIATION IF THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS ANY RESTRICTION BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY,
More informationTHE UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES REGULATION. AMENDATORY SECTION (Amending Order R 78-3, filed 7/27/78, effective 9/1/78)
THE UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES REGULATION WAC 284-30-300 Authority and purpose. RCW 48.30.010 authorizes the commissioner to define methods of competition and acts and practices in the conduct
More informationc:;;::; ~ORDER APPROVING DISTRIBUTION PLAN
Case 1:08-cv-05523-LAK-GWG Document 596 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~ In re LEHMAN BROTHERS SECURITIES AND ERISA LITIGATION This Document Applies
More informationCase 5:16-cv NC Document Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT 1
Case 5:16-cv-03698-NC Document 142-4 Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT 1 Case 5:16-cv-03698-NC Document 142-4 Filed 04/20/18 Page 2 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationTHIS NOTICE IS DIRECTED TO:
THIS NOTICE IS DIRECTED TO: United States District Court for the Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Goertzen v. Great American Life Insurance Co., Case No. 4:16-cv-00240
More informationPROBATE IN NEVADA WHAT, WHY, AND HOW by Layne T. Rushforth
WHAT, WHY, AND HOW by Layne T. Rushforth 1. What is Probate?: Probate generally refers to the court proceeding required to formalize the transfer of the assets 1 belonging to a deceased person ( decedent
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. IF YOU PURCHASED MERCHANDISE FROM SPORTS
More informationDrafting Marital Trusts
Drafting Marital Trusts Prepared by: Joshua E. Husbands Holland & Knight LLP 111 SW 5 th Ave. Suite 2300 Portland, OR 97212 503.243.2300 Copyright 2016 Holland & Knight LLP All rights reserved. The information
More informationDESCRIPTION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
DESCRIPTION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Merck & Co. ( Merck ) has entered into a Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) with certain plaintiffs counsel ( Negotiating Plaintiffs Counsel ) in order to establish
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 30 Article 1A 1
Article 1A. Elective Share. 30-3.1. Right of elective share. (a) Elective Share. The surviving spouse of a decedent who dies domiciled in this State has a right to claim an "elective share", which means
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF DISTRIBUTION PLAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re BANK OF AMERICA CORP. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE, AND EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT (ERISA) LITIGATION Master File No. 09 MD 2058
More informationDrafting Marital Trusts
Drafting Marital Trusts Prepared by: Joshua E. Husbands Holland & Knight LLP 111 SW 5 th Ave. Suite 2300 Portland, OR 97212 503.243.2300 Copyright 2012 Holland & Knight LLP. All rights reserved. The information
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION Whitney Main, et al., Plaintiffs, v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No.: 4:16-cv-00473-O
More informationANTI-FRAUD PLAN. Page 1 of 8
ANTI-FRAUD PLAN Purpose The Anti-Fraud Plan addresses the detection and prevention of overpayments, abuse and fraud relating to the provision of and payment for the School Readiness (SR) program and Voluntary
More informationJOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE CSAC EXCESS INSURANCE AUTHORITY
Adopted: October 5, 1979 Amended: May 12, 1980 Amended: January 23, 1987 Amended: October 7, 1988 Amended: March 1993 Amended: November 18, 1996 Amended: October 4, 2005 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING
More informationPhilip Dix v. Total Petrochemicals USA Inc Pension Plan
2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-30-2013 Philip Dix v. Total Petrochemicals USA Inc Pension Plan Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential
More informationSenate Bill No. 818 CHAPTER 404
Senate Bill No. 818 CHAPTER 404 An act to amend Section 2924 of, to amend and repeal Sections 2923.4, 2923.5, 2923.6, 2923.7, 2924.12, 2924.15, and 2924.17 of, to add Sections 2923.55, 2924.9, 2924.10,
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Karolyn Kruger, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Novant Health Inc., et al., Defendants. Case No. 14-cv-208 Judge William Osteen, Jr. NOTICE OF
More informationAMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE COMPANY 175 Water Street Group, Inc. New York, NY 10038
AIG COMPANIES AIG MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS INSURANCE GROUP SELLER-SIDE R&W TEMPLATE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE COMPANY 175 Water Street Group, Inc. New York, NY 10038 A Member Company
More informationPROOF OF CLAIM FORM CONTENTS Certification 11
PROOF OF CLAIM FORM IN RE UNILIFE CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MASTER FILE NO. 16-CV-03976-RA CONTENTS 02 05 07 09 General Instructions Claimant
More informationA court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
IMPORTANT NOTICE OF A RED BULL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND YOUR RIGHT TO PAYMENT ( CLASS NOTICE ) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL DISTRICT MICHELLE ROACH (
More informationInternational Union of Operating Engineers Local 4 and Its Branches Pension Plan
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 4 and Its Branches Pension Plan Procedures and Policies for the Qualification and Interpretation of Domestic Relations Orders Adopted by the Board of Trustees
More informationHANFORD EMPLOYEE WELFARE TRUST (HEWT) RETIREE HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENT
HANFORD EMPLOYEE WELFARE TRUST (HEWT) RETIREE HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENT January 1, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE I DEFINITION OF TERMS...1 1.1 Definitions...1 1.2 Gender and Number...2 ARTICLE
More information