Overview of Tax Court Representative Cases:
|
|
- Madison Sutton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Litigating Insurance Tax Cases Overview of Tax Court Representative Cases: A View from The Bench with Judges Mark V. Holmes and Albert G. Lauber May 11, 2018 Susan Seabrook Partner, (US) LLP 2018 (US) LLP
2
3 Selected Cases for Discussion Avrahami v. Commissioner, 149 T.C. No. 7 (2017) R.V.I. Guaranty Co. v. Commissioner, 145 T.C. 209 (2015) Webber v. Commissioner, 144 T.C. 324 (2015) Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. Commissioner, 142 T.C. 1 (2014) Securitas Holdings, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo Acuity v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Commissioner, 135 T.C. 543 (2010), aff d in part, rev d in part, 678 F.3d 357 (7th Cir. 2012) Cigna Corp. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Ins. Co. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo , aff d, 285 F.3d 1086 (8th Cir. 2002) Utah Medical Ins. Ass n v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo
4 Avrahami v. Commissioner Question presented: Whether captive insurance company s elections to be treated as a small insurance company and to be taxed as a domestic corporation were invalid Taxpayer position: Amounts paid qualified as insurance premiums for Federal income tax purposes Government position: Amounts transferred out of captive insurance company were distributions Tax Court: Taxpayers did not enter into a valid insurance transaction No risk distribution Not insurance in its commonly accepted sense Apparently, premiums not otherwise deductible as a section 162 deduction No penalties on the insurance transaction Foreign-domiciled captive lost its elections, but parties agreed to no U.S. income 4
5 R.V.I. v. Commissioner Question presented: Whether residual value insurance policies were contracts of insurance for Federal income tax purposes Taxpayer position: Contracts insuring against the risk that the actual value of an asset upon termination of a lease would be significantly lower than the expected value are contracts of insurance Government position: The protection purchased by the lessors covered investment risk rather than insurance risk Tax Court: The risks incurred by the policies sold cover an insurance risk and, therefore, the policies constitute contracts of insurance for Federal income tax purposes 5
6 Webber v. Commissioner Question presented: Whether the income earned by investment accounts managed through private placement variable life insurance was taxable to the owner of the policy Taxpayer position: Neither the Investor Control doctrine nor the Constructive Receipt doctrine applied to tax income earned through these investment accounts Government position: Mr. Webber retained sufficient control and incidents of ownership over the assets in the separate accounts to be treated as their owner for Federal income tax purposes Tax Court: The IRS pronouncements enunciating the Investor Control doctrine are entitled to deference and weight Mr. Webber retained control and incidents of ownership over the assets held in the private placement-related investment account; he was therefore taxable on the income earned on those assets during the taxable years at issue 6
7 Rent-A-Center v. Commissioner Question presented: Whether payments to a subsidiary insurance company were deductible, pursuant to section 162, as insurance expenses Taxpayer position: The subsidiary was a bona fide insurance company, and the arrangement between the parties constituted insurance in the commonly accepted sense Government position: The subsidiary was created primarily as a tax shelter for the parent company and, in any event, there was no risk shifting Tax Court: Premiums paid by a parent company to a subsidiary insurance company on behalf of other wholly-owned subsidiaries were properly deductible as insurance premiums 7
8 Securitas v. Commissioner Question presented: Whether taxpayer is entitled to deduct premiums paid through captive insurance arrangement established by its parent corporation Taxpayer position: Captive insurance arrangement was insurance for Federal income tax purposes Government position: Parental guarantee blocked any actual risk shifting Tax Court: Payments made to a brother-sister insurance company were properly deductible as insurance premiums because the arrangement shifted risks, distributed risks, and constituted insurance in the commonly accepted sense 8
9 Acuity v. Commissioner Question presented: Whether the taxpayer s yearend carried loss reserves, as used in computing losses incurred, are a fair and reasonable estimate and represent only actual unpaid losses Taxpayer position: Reserves determined by professional actuaries through accepted actuarial methodologies and reported on the NAIC annual statement in accordance with NAIC statutory accounting guidance should be respected Government position: Relationship between the annual statement and section 832 does not prove that the carried loss reserves are fair and reasonable; the annual statement controls for what is includible in the reserve but not for the amount of the reserve Tax Court: Loss reserves based on NAIC and ASOP standards were fair and reasonable and represented only actual unpaid losses 9
10 State Farm v. Commissioner Question presented: Whether extracontractual amounts for bad faith damages are included in unpaid losses Taxpayer position: The Annual Statement method of accounting controls; amounts were properly included under those rules Government position: Annual Statement accounting does not control tax accounting for extracontractual losses; amounts properly accounted for as business expense under section 832(c) Tax Court: Not convinced that section 832(b) was intended to have the Annual Statement accounting control tax treatment of extracontractual losses; Sears not controlling 7th Circuit: Sears controlling; Annual Statement accounting controlling; NAIC has spoken to compensatory damages but not punitive 10
11 Cigna v. Commissioner Question presented: Whether Cigna may use AG 34 to compute its tax reserves for MGDB reinsurance Taxpayer position: There was no prescribed CARVM method in effect covering MGDB reinsurance on the date the contracts were issued, thus Cigna is required to use a method consistent with CARVM Government position: AG 34 did not exist and thus was not the method in effect on the date the contracts were issued, therefore Cigna may not use AG 34 Tax Court: IRS conceded the deficiency; parties stipulated that Cigna s tax reserves correctly computed [T]he tax reserve issue is a discrete legal issue involving a specific insurance product Not convinced that resolving the legal issue will alleviate the uncertainty for thousands of taxpayers Respondent represented he will not challenge petitioner or other taxpayers that used AG 34 to compute tax reserves for MGDB reserves Declined to decide the discrete legal issue 11
12 Minnesota Lawyers versus Utah Medical Minnesota Lawyers Question presented: Whether the taxpayer s reserves as reported were fair and reasonable Taxpayer position: Unpaid loss reserves set by internal departments should be sufficient for Federal income tax purposes Government position: The unpaid loss reserves were not fair and reasonable because they did not represent actual unpaid losses as accurately as possible Utah Medical Whether the taxpayer s reserves as reported were fair and reasonable Statutory reserves, although at the high end, were certified by a third-party actuary and should be OK for Federal income taxes Only the midpoint or tax equipoise of an actuarial range is the fair and reasonable estimate required by the regulations Tax Court: Reduced the insurance company s unpaid loss reserves to a courtdetermined fair and reasonable amount Although the reserve estimate was high, the actuary complied with actuarial standards; the estimate was upheld 12
13 Lessons Learned Precedent matters Know your audience Amicus can be influential Facts matter 13
14 Views from the Bench Practitioners commonly assume we should: Anticipate follow-up questions from the bench Use trial time wisely Tell a cohesive story Little details can make a difference 14
15 15
16 Contact me Susan Seabrook Partner eversheds-sutherland.com 2018 (US) LLP All rights reserved.
CAPTIVE INSURANCE BEST PRACTICES AND THE DEFENSE OF IRS ATTACKS
CAPTIVE INSURANCE BEST PRACTICES AND THE DEFENSE OF IRS ATTACKS Presented by: Steven Miller National Director of Tax and John Dies Managing Director Tax Controversy Services 4 BILLION IN CREDITS & INCENTIVES
More informationTAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR TAXABLE ENTITIES
TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR TAXABLE ENTITIES Mike Domanski Partner Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP T.C. Leshikar Partner, Tax PwC Cayman Islands AGENDA Insurance vs. Non-Insurance Offshore Federal Tax
More informationCaptive Insurance Companies after Avrahami: What Happens Next?
Captive Insurance Companies after Avrahami: What Happens Next? Insurance Companies Committee ABA Tax Section San Diego Feb 9, 2018 Kacie Dillon, Woolston & Tarter P.C., Phoenix, AZ Chaz Lavelle, Bingham
More informationFEDERAL INCOME TAX ISSUES
FEDERAL INCOME TAX ISSUES Paul H. Phillips III, Partner, Ernst & Young LLP Bruce Wright, Partner, Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP Tom Jones, Partner, McDermott Will & Emery LLP AGENDA Insurance Tax Concepts
More informationTCIA Tennessee Captive Insurance Association, Inc.
Edward K. White Charles Chaz Lavelle Gary Bowers 1320 Main Street, 17 th Floor Senior Partner Partner Columbia, SC 29201 Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP Johnson Lambert, LLP Direct:502-587-3557 ed.white@nelsonmullins.com
More information831(b) Captives and Tax Issues
831(b) Captives and Tax Issues September 16, 2014 Presented by: David J. Slenn Quarles & Brady LLP (239) 659.5061 david.slenn@quarles.com Chicago Indianapolis Madison Milwaukee Naples Phoenix Tampa Tucson
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. SECURITAS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2014-225 UNITED STATES TAX COURT SECURITAS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 21206-10. Filed October 29, 2014. petitioner.
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. KENNETH L. MALLORY AND LARITA K. MALLORY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2016-110 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KENNETH L. MALLORY AND LARITA K. MALLORY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 14873-14. Filed June 6, 2016. Joseph A. Flores,
More informationP&C LOSS RESERVES AFTER THE ACUITY DECISION
TUESDAY NOVEMBER 12, 2013 10 11 AM CENTRAL TIME P&C LOSS RESERVES AFTER THE ACUITY DECISION Thomas Wheeland Partner BKD, LLP twheeland@bkd.com Richard Riley Partner Foley & Lardner Michael Conway Partner
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. ALEX AND TONJA ORIA, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2007-226 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ALEX AND TONJA ORIA, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 246-05. Filed August 14, 2007. Steve M. Williard, for petitioners.
More informationArticle from: Taxing Times. May 2014 Volume 10, Issue 2
Article from: Taxing Times May 2014 Volume 10, Issue 2 T 3 : TAXING TIMES TIDBITS Susan J. Hotine is a partner with the Washington, D.C. law firm Scribner, Hall & Thompson, LLP and may be reached at shotine@
More informationSecuritas Holdings, Inc. and Subs. v. Commissioner TC Memo
CLICK HERE to return to the home page Securitas Holdings, Inc. and Subs. v. Commissioner TC Memo 2014-225 Respondent issued a notice of deficiency determining deficiencies of $13,801,906 for 2003 and $16,496,539
More informationUS TAX COURT gges t US TAX COURT JUL * JUL :39 AM. v. Docket No
US TAX COURT gges t US TAX COURT RECEIVED y % sus efiled JUL 19 2018 * JUL 19 2018 12:39 AM RESERVE MECHANICAL CORP. F.K.A. RESERVE CASUALTY CORP., Petitioner, ELECTRONICALLY FILED v. Docket No. 14545-16
More informationCAPTIVE INSURANCE: Primer and Federal Tax Overview. November 2009
CAPTIVE INSURANCE: Primer and Federal Tax Overview November 2009 Overview 1. Types of Captives 2. Captive Insurance Domiciles: Foreign versus Domestic Jurisdiction Considerations 3. Professionals Required
More informationThis case is referenced in an endnote at the Bradford Tax Institute. CLICK HERE to go to the home page.
This case is referenced in an endnote at the Bradford Tax Institute. CLICK HERE to go to the home page. 123 T.C. No. 16 UNITED STATES TAX COURT TONY R. CARLOS AND JUDITH D. CARLOS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. ERNEST N. ZWEIFEL, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2012-93 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ERNEST N. ZWEIFEL, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent CREWS ALL NITE BAIL BONDS, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. NICHOLAS A. AND MARJORIE E. PALEVEDA, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 1997-416 UNITED STATES TAX COURT NICHOLAS A. AND MARJORIE E. PALEVEDA, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 840-96. Filed September 18, 1997. Nicholas A. Paleveda,
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2012-94 UNITED STATES TAX COURT STEPHEN A. WALLACH AND KIMBERLY K.
More informationTax Issues for P&C Actuaries
CAS Spring Meeting May 19, 2015 Colorado Springs CO Tax Issues for P&C Actuaries Richard Riley Foley & Lardner LLP Chuck Mitchell FCAS MAAA Milliman Inc. Co-presenter Sheryl Flum KPMG LLP Rich Yocius FCAS
More informationT.C. Summary Opinion UNITED STATES TAX COURT
T.C. Summary Opinion 2016-19 UNITED STATES TAX COURT WENDELL WILSON AND ANGELICA M. WILSON, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 16610-13S. Filed April 25, 2016. Wendell
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. YULIA FEDER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2012-10 UNITED STATES TAX COURT YULIA FEDER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 1628-10. Filed January 10, 2012. Frank Agostino, Lawrence M. Brody, and Jeffrey
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. CENTRAL MOTORPLEX, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2014-207 UNITED STATES TAX COURT CENTRAL MOTORPLEX, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 19754-11. Filed October 7, 2014. William G. Coleman, Jr., for
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. EDWARD S. FLUME, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2017-21 UNITED STATES TAX COURT EDWARD S. FLUME, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent Docket No. 15772-14L. Filed January 30, 2017. David Rodriguez, for petitioner.
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. JAMES MAGUIRE AND JOY MAGUIRE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2012-160 UNITED STATES TAX COURT JAMES MAGUIRE AND JOY MAGUIRE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent MARC MAGUIRE AND PAMELA MAGUIRE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
More informationT.J. Henry Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner 80 T.C. 886 (T.C. 1983)
T.J. Henry Associates, Inc. v. Commissioner 80 T.C. 886 (T.C. 1983) JUDGES: Whitaker, Judge. OPINION BY: WHITAKER OPINION CLICK HERE to return to the home page For the years 1976 and 1977, deficiencies
More informationCaptive Tax Developments
Captive Tax Developments Kentucky Captive Association 2016 Educational nference Thomas J. Munninghoff, Partner Munninghoff, Lange & mpany tmunninghoff@ml-co.com Charles J. (Chaz) Lavelle, Partner Bingham
More informationYulia Feder v. Commissioner, TC Memo , Code Sec(s) 61; 72; 6201; 7491.
Checkpoint Contents Federal Library Federal Source Materials Federal Tax Decisions Tax Court Memorandum Decisions Tax Court Memorandum Decisions (Current Year) Advance Tax Court Memorandums Yulia Feder,
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. CHRISTINE C. PETERSON AND ROGER V. PETERSON, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2013-271 UNITED STATES TAX COURT CHRISTINE C. PETERSON AND ROGER V. PETERSON, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket Nos. 16263-11, 2068-12. Filed November 25, 2013.
More information140 T.C. No. 8 UNITED STATES TAX COURT
140 T.C. No. 8 UNITED STATES TAX COURT WISE GUYS HOLDINGS, LLC, PETER J. FORSTER, TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 6643-12. Filed April 22, 2013.
More informationNavigating the Fundamentals of Captive Taxation
Navigating the Fundamentals of Captive Taxation Matt Gravelin-Johnson Lambert Derick White-Strategic Risk Solutions Jeff Johnson- Primmer Piper Eggleston and Cramer, PC March 10, 2014 from 1:30-2:30pm
More information101 Tax Update The Good, Bad, and Ugly
101 Tax Update The Good, Bad, and Ugly Michael Serricchio, Senior VP, Marsh Captive Solutions Fred Krull, Principal, EY Ernie Achtien, CFO, Captive Resources Agenda Captives trends, value drivers and benchmarking
More informationTHE ANGUS FIRM, PLC CAPTIVE INSURANCE REPORT 2014 VOL. 1
1 THE ANGUS FIRM, PLC CAPTIVE INSURANCE REPORT 2014 VOL. 1 INTRODUCTION Vermont has remained at the forefront of domiciles by updating its statutes and implementing new and innovative ideas to meet the
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2012-12 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ANDREA READY, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER
More informationThe Changing Landscape of Captive Taxation
The Changing Landscape of Captive Taxation Paul H Phillips III Ernst & Young Partner Rick Irvine PwC Partner Insurance Framework Case Law Overview Insurance Risk Risk Shifting Risk Distribution Common
More informationClient Alert. September 11, By Edward L. Froelich
September 11, 2015 No (Tax) Man Is Above the Law: The Tax Court Rejects Final Cost-Sharing Regulations in Altera Corporation and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner, 145 T.C. 3 (July 27, 2015) By Edward L. Froelich
More informationWilliams v Commissioner TC Memo
CLICK HERE to return to the home page Williams v Commissioner TC Memo 2015-76 Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' income tax for tax years 2009 and 2010 of $8,712 and $17,610, respectively.
More informationCaptive Insurance Tax Panel
Captive Insurance Tax Panel Thomas M. Jones McDermott Will & Emery LLP Chicago, Illinois Phone: (312) 984-7536 Email: tjones@mwe.com Daniel Kusaila Saslow, Lufkin & Buggy, LLP Avon, Connecticut (860) 470-2122
More informationHold the Intercompany Transactions State and Local Tax Considerations
Hold the Intercompany Transactions State and Local Tax Considerations Current Issues in State & Local Taxation TEI Philadelphia Chapter February 22, 2017 Open Weaver Banks Andrew Appleby 2017 (US) LLP
More informationSale to Grantor Trust Transaction (Including Note With Defined Value Feature) Under Attack, Estate of Donald Woelbing v.
Sale to Grantor Trust Transaction (Including Note With Defined Value Feature) Under Attack, Estate of Donald Woelbing v. Commissioner (Docket No. 30261-13) and Estate of Marion Woelbing v. Commissioner
More informationBURDEN OF PROOF. Shift Happens
BURDEN OF PROOF Shift Happens Overview of Presentation 1. Information Returns 2. Issue Specific 3. Statutory - 7491 4. General Production v. Persuasion Burden of going forward Reasonable person can find
More informationCaptive insurance companies ( captives ) allow taxpayers with large risk exposures
Insurance Perspectives Effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 on Captive Insurance Companies By Thomas Cyr, Sheryl Flum and William Olver * Captive insurance companies ( captives ) allow taxpayers
More informationPart III - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous. The Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department have become aware of a type of
Part III - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Tax Avoidance Using Inflated Basis Notice 2002-21 The Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department have become aware of a type of transaction,
More informationTax Update. April 20, 2016 Douglas J. Youngren, CPA, JD, Tax Partner
? Tax Update April 20, 2016 Douglas J. Youngren, CPA, JD, Tax Partner Speaker DOUG YOUNGREN CPA, JD, Tax Partner Doug is a tax partner in s insurance practice who oversees all aspects of the firm s Chicago
More informationT.C. Memo United States Tax Court. JOHN A. AND MARY L. BATOK v. COMMISSIONER. Docket No Filed December 28, 1992.
T.C. Memo 1992-727 United States Tax Court JOHN A. AND MARY L. BATOK v. COMMISSIONER. Docket No. 18571-91. Filed December 28, 1992. John A. Batok, pro se. Dale Raymond, for the respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationAugust 10, Comments on the Definition of Insurance for Tax Purposes. Dear Associate Chief Counsel Hubbard:
Page: 1 of 18 Section of Taxation OFFICERS Chair William H. Caudill Houston, TX Chair-Elect Karen L. Hawkins Yachats, OR Vice Chairs Administration Charles P. Rettig Beverly Hills, CA Committee Operations
More informationI. SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS.
Terri A. Merriam, J.D. tamerriam@merriamandassociates.com SideCars, Inc. 532 South Main Street Suite Z Joplin, MO 64801 You requested an opinion letter that will assist business owners in assessing the
More information831(b) ELECTION
A6: TAX & REGULATORY ISSUES FOR 831(b) CAPTIVES SIIA 33rd Annual National Educational Conference & Expo October 21 23, 2013 Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers Chicago, IL Charles J. ( Chaz ) Lavelle Ernie
More informationS Corporation Shareholder Stock Basis & Bona Fide Shareholder Debt
S Corporation Shareholder Stock Basis & Bona Fide Shareholder Debt Shareholder Debt Basis IRC 1366(d)(1)(B) states that losses are allowed up to the amount of the shareholder's adjusted basis of any indebtedness
More informationArticle from: Taxing Times. February 2013 Volume 9 Issue 1
Article from: Taxing Times February 2013 Volume 9 Issue 1 T 3 : TAXING TIMES TIDBITS Peter H. Winslow is a partner with the Washington, D.C. law firm of Scribner, Hall & Thompson, LLP and may be reached
More informationEXPECTED ADVERSE DEVIATION AS MEASURE OF RISK DISTRIBUTION
EXPECTED ADVERSE DEVIATION AS MEASURE OF RISK DISTRIBUTION Joseph A. Herbers, ACAS, MAAA, CERA Managing Principal, Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Inc. Melanie Snyman, CA (SA) Assurance director, PwC Cayman
More informationSSAP Update What you need to know for 2014
SSAP Update What you need to know for 2014 Carolina IASA Presenters Brandy Vannoy, CPA Partner Johnson Lambert LLP Scott Hall, CPA Principal Johnson Lambert LLP 2 Agenda Statutory Accounting Update for
More informationBack To The Future: The Insurance Industry And Tax Reform
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Back To The Future: The Insurance Industry
More informationPresented by Thomas F. Wheeland, CPA Dale L. Scholl II, CPA. Tax Update and SSAP101 Boot Camp
Presented by Thomas F. Wheeland, CPA Dale L. Scholl II, CPA Tax Update and SSAP101 Boot Camp AGENDA Recent Developments in Tax Legislation PATH Act, Appropriations Bill, Highway Bill Tax Reform Research
More informationU.S. INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 1031 TAX DEFERRED LIKE KIND EXCHANGES. This outline has been modified to reflect the recent changes in the tax law.
U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 1031 TAX DEFERRED LIKE KIND EXCHANGES This outline has been modified to reflect the recent changes in the tax law. I. SECTION 1031 LIKE KIND EXCHANGE A. What is a 1031
More informationUS Tax Court s Altera Decision Raises Broader Questions
US Tax Court s Altera Decision Raises Broader Questions The US Tax Court on July 27 held, in a unanimous 15-0 decision in Altera Corp. v. Commissioner, that a rule promulgated under the 1995 cost sharing
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. RUBEN DE LOS SANTOS AND MARTHA DE LOS SANTOS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2018-155 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RUBEN DE LOS SANTOS AND MARTHA DE LOS SANTOS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 5458-16. Filed September 18, 2018. respondent.
More information138 T.C. No. 22 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. JACK TRUGMAN AND JOAN E. TRUGMAN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
This opinion is referenced in an endnote at the Bradford Tax Institute. CLICK HERE to go to the home page. 138 T.C. No. 22 UNITED STATES TAX COURT JACK TRUGMAN AND JOAN E. TRUGMAN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2009-94 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RAMON EMILIO PEREZ, Petitioner v.
More informationT.C. Summary Opinion UNITED STATES TAX COURT
T.C. Summary Opinion 2016-57 UNITED STATES TAX COURT MARIO JOSEPH COLLODI, JR. AND ELIZABETH LOUISE COLLODI, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 17131-14S. Filed September
More informationSCRIBNER, HALL & THOMPSON, LLP
SCRIBNER, HALL & THOMPSON, LLP THOMAS C. THOMPSON, JR. MARK H. KOVEY STEPHEN P. DICKE PETER H. WINSLOW SUSAN J. HOTINE BIRUTA P. KELLY GREGORY K. OYLER LORI J. JONES SAMUEL A. MITCHELL JANEL C. FRANK *
More informationChapter 2. What is Insurance?
Chapter 2 What is Insurance? This chapter addresses: The definition of insurance under the Federal income tax law, including the impact of the risk-shifting, risk-distribution, and other requirements of
More informationThe Evolving Tax Environment for Captive Insurance Companies
The Evolving Tax Environment for Captive Insurance Companies Beckett Cantley, JD, LL.M. Law Professor at John Marshall Law School The Atlanta Law Group F. Hale Stewart JD, LL.M. The Law Office of Hale
More informationPrivate Letter Ruling
CLICK HERE to return to the home page Private Letter Ruling 9330001 Issues (1) Whether expenses incurred by an individual partner for local automobile travel on partnership business are section 162(a)
More informationArticle from: Taxing Times. February 2010 Volume 6, Issue 1
Article from: Taxing Times February 2010 Volume 6, Issue 1 CHANGE IN BASIS OF COMPUTING RESERVES IS IT OR ISN T IT? By Peter H. Winslow and Lori J. Jones High on the list of the most frequently asked questions
More informationv. Docket 'No S
UNITED STATES TAX COURT Washington, D.C. 20217 GERNOT AND HELGA RUTH MUELLER, Petitioners, v. Docket 'No. 532-89S COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. DECISION Pursuant to the determination of
More informationRev. Rul , I.R.B. 984 (12/30/2002)
Rev. Rul. 2002-89, 2002-52 I.R.B. 984 (12/30/2002) Part I Section 162. Trade or Business Expenses 26 CFR 1.162-1: Business Expenses. (Also sections 801, 831.) Captive insurance. This ruling considers circumstances
More informationForeign Insurer: to Elect or Not to Elect (That Is a Question)
taxnotes Foreign Insurer: to Elect or Not to Elect (That Is a Question) By Sheryl Flum, Jean M. Baxley, and Liz Petrie Reprinted from Tax Notes, September 12, 2016, p. 1741 Volume 152, Number 11 September
More informationALI-ABA Course of Study Sophisticated Estate Planning Techniques
397 ALI-ABA Course of Study Sophisticated Estate Planning Techniques Cosponsored by Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc. September 4-5, 2008 Boston, Massachusetts Planning for Private Equity
More informationILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Wendy s International, Inc. v. Hamer, 2013 IL App (4th) 110678 Appellate Court Caption WENDY S INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRIAN HAMER, in His
More informationWandry v. Commissioner
Wandry v. Commissioner The Secret Sauce Estate Planners Have Been Waiting For? By Tiffany B. Carmona And Tye J. Klooster Tiffany B. Carmona is a senior vice-president and associate fiduciary counsel in
More informationAre Insurance Bad Faith Recoveries Taxable?
MCLE Are Insurance Bad Faith Recoveries Taxable? The answer depends on a number of factors. BY ROBERT W. WOOD AUGUST 1, 2016 CONTINUE TO TEST If you recover a judgment for bad faith damages, is the monetary
More informationP & C Tax Update Knowledge is the Key IASA 86 TH ANNUAL EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCE & BUSINESS SHOW
1 P & C Tax Update Knowledge is the Key 306 IASA 86 TH ANNUAL EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCE & BUSINESS SHOW Speakers DOUG YOUNGREN CPA, JD, Tax Partner Doug is a tax partner in Plante Moran s insurance practice
More information26 CFR : Examination of returns and claims for refund, credit, or abatement; determination of correct tax liability. (Also Part 1, 280A, 1031).
Part III Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous 26 CFR 601.105: Examination of returns and claims for refund, credit, or abatement; determination of correct tax liability. (Also Part 1, 280A, 1031).
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT
T.C. Memo. 2014-100 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ESTATE OF HAZEL F. HICKS SANDERS, DECEASED, MICHAEL W. SANDERS AND SALLIE S. WILLIAMSON, CO-EXECUTORS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
More informationTaxation - Accounting for Prepaid Income
Louisiana Law Review Volume 18 Number 1 The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1956-1957 Term December 1957 Taxation - Accounting for Prepaid Income W. Bernard Kramer Repository Citation W. Bernard
More informationP: E:
ATTORNEY BIOGRAPHY Saren Goldner Partner New York P: +1.212.389.5063 E: sarengoldner@eversheds-sutherland.com Education J.D., State University of New York at Buffalo Law School B.A., summa cum laude, University
More informationNotice , I.R.B. (6/9/2003)
Notice 2003-34, 2003-23 I.R.B. (6/9/2003) Part III - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Offshore Entities Investing in Hedge Funds Notice 2003-34 I. PURPOSE Treasury and the Internal Revenue
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. EUGENE W. ALPERN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2000-246 UNITED STATES TAX COURT EUGENE W. ALPERN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 20304-98. Filed August 8, 2000. Eugene W. Alpern, pro se. Gregory J.
More informationInternational Tax. Chapter 8
International Tax Chapter 8 Grecian Magnesite Mining (GMM), Industrial & Shipping Co., SA, 149 TC No. 3 8-10 (July 13, 2017) Foreign Corporation's Disposition Of Interest In U.S. Partnership (55 Page Opinion)
More informationIRC 751 "Hot Assets": Calculating and Reporting Ordinary Income in Disposition of Partnership or LLC Interests
FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY IRC 751 "Hot Assets": Calculating and Reporting Ordinary Income in Disposition of Partnership or LLC Interests WEDNESDAY, JULY 26, 2017, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern IMPORTANT INFORMATION
More informationIC-DISC Strategies: Mastering the Complex Operational Challenges
IC-DISC Strategies: Mastering the Complex Operational Challenges Anticipating IRS Audit Risks, Calculating Commissions, and Tackling Computational Intricacies TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2014, 1:00-3:00 pm Eastern
More informationIRS Appeals New Faces, New Challenges
TEI s 68 th Midyear Conference IRS Appeals New Faces, New Challenges Brian Kaufman, Capital One Financial Corporation (moderator) Patti Burquest, RSM US LLP Alex Sadler, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Susan
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 5, 2011 Decided June 21, 2011 No. 10-1262 UTAM, LTD. AND DDM MANAGEMENT, INC., TAX MATTERS PARTNER, APPELLEES v. COMMISSIONER
More informationDowns Rachlin Martin PLLC Captive Insurance Update Issue No
Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC Captive Insurance Update Issue No. 1 2017 Developments in Vermont Changes at the Top 2016 Formation Data 2017 Captive Legislation Affordable Housing Tax Credits Amended Regulations
More informationBureau of Captive and Financial Insurance Products
Bureau of Captive and Financial Insurance Products Delaware Captive Insurance Association Spring Forum May 9, 2017 Steve Kinion Director, Delaware Insurance Department Delaware is the 3 rd Largest U.S.
More informationTAX MEMORANDUM. CPAs, Clients & Associates. David L. Silverman, Esq. Shirlee Aminoff, Esq. DATE: April 2, Attorney-Client Privilege
LAW OFFICES DAVID L. SILVERMAN, J.D., LL.M. 2001 MARCUS AVENUE LAKE SUCCESS, NEW YORK 11042 (516) 466-5900 SILVERMAN, DAVID L. TELECOPIER (516) 437-7292 NYTAXATTY@AOL.COM AMINOFF, SHIRLEE AMINOFFS@GMAIL.COM
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Peter McLauchlan v. Case: CIR 12-60657 Document: 00512551524 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2014Doc. 502551524 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT PETER A. MCLAUCHLAN, United States
More informationABA: Safe Harbor Parking Like-Kind Exchanges
ABA: Safe Harbor Parking Like-Kind Exchanges Robert D. Schachat and Glenn Johnson Ernst & Young LLP January 22, 2011 Disclaimer Ernst & Young refers to the global organization of member firms of Ernst
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2010-127 UNITED STATES TAX COURT SVEND F. AND MISCHELLE T. STENSLET,
More informationREPRESENTING NON-FILERS. Journal of the National Association of Enrolled Agents
REPRESENTING NON-FILERS Journal of the National Association of Enrolled Agents Published September/October 2007 By Howard S. Levy Non-filers are often overwhelmed by their predicament. Many times they
More informationCh 5 IRAs and Qualified Plans TCJA Changes
Ch 5 IRAs and Qualified Plans TCJA Changes Repeal Of Special Rule Permitting Recharacterization Of Roth Conversions Effective date: TYBA December 31, 2017. Sunset date: None See IRS FAQs 3 Rollover Period
More informationFisher v. Commissioner 54 T.C. 905 (T.C. 1970)
CLICK HERE to return to the home page Fisher v. Commissioner 54 T.C. 905 (T.C. 1970) United States Tax Court. Filed April 29, 1970. Maurice Weinstein, for the petitioners. Denis J. Conlon, for the respondent.
More informationTax Update. Presented by David Roberts FM21 5/24/2016 8:00 AM - 9:15 AM. May 22-25, 2016 Los Angeles Convention Center Los Angeles, California
May 22-25, 2016 Los Angeles Convention Center Los Angeles, California Tax Update Presented by David Roberts FM21 5/24/2016 8:00 AM - 9:15 AM The handouts and presentations attached are copyright and trademark
More informationPRIVATE RULING atty fees to class counsel.txt PRIVATE RULING PRIVATE RULING
PRIVATE RULING 200518017PRIVATE RULING 200518017 "This document may not be used or cited as precedent. Section 6110(j)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code." Section 61 -- Gross Income Defined; Section 6041
More informationH. Compensation. Present Law
1. Nonqualified deferred compensation In general H. Compensation Present Law Compensation may be received currently or may be deferred to a later time. The tax treatment of deferred compensation depends
More informationAmerican Bar Association Section of Taxation S Corporation Committee. Important Developments in the Federal Income Taxation of S Corporations
American Bar Association Section of Taxation S Corporation Committee Important Developments in the Federal Income Taxation of S Corporations Hyatt Regency Denver, Colorado October 21, 2011 Dana Lasley
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2013-62 UNITED STATES TAX COURT SEAN MCALARY LTD, INC., Petitioner
More informationLind v. Commissioner T.C. Memo
CLICK HERE to return to the home page Lind v. Commissioner T.C. Memo 1985-490 Memorandum Opinion PARKER, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners' 1980 Federal income tax in the amount
More informationCompensation to Law Firm Shareholder-Employees Disallowed by Tax Court
Compensation to Law Firm Shareholder-Employees Disallowed by Tax Court In Brinks, 1 the Tax Court once again applied the independent investor test to recharacterize compensation paid by a professional
More informationSection 831(b) Captive Nuances and Best Practices, Tax Risk Distribution/Sharing and. Accounting Risk Transfer Rules
ACI s 2 nd Advanced Forum on Captive Insurance Section 831(b) Captive Nuances and Best Practices, Tax Risk Distribution/Sharing and April 24-25, 2014 Accounting Risk Transfer Rules Anne Marie Towle Senior
More information