Solvency Assessment and Management. SA QIS2 Annexure 1 Possible approach in determining the SCR including the change in risk margin
|
|
- Charla Gregory
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Solvency Assessment and Management SA QIS2 Annexure 1 Possible approach in determining the SCR including the change in risk margin 13 July 2012
2 1. Introduction oduction According to paragraph SCR.1.3 of the SA QIS2 technical specifications, for the purposes of the SCR standard formula calculation, technical provisions should be valued in accordance with the specifications laid out in the section on valuation within the SA QIS2 technical specifications. To avoid circularity in the calculation, the default option is that any reference to technical provisions within the calculations for the individual SCR modules is to be understood to exclude the risk margin. However, participants can choose to calculate their SCR using the change in technical provisions including the risk margin. This will require an iterative approach to determine both the SCR and the risk margin. Participants that choose to calculate the SCR using the technical provisions including risk margin will need to ensure that the SCR and risk margin stabilise. This may take several iterations. This document outlines a possible approach which insurers may follow when calculating the SCR using the change in technical provisions including the risk margin. The approach is by no means compulsory, and insurers are allowed to use their own approach if they choose to calculate the SCR using the technical provisions including the risk margin. For insurers opting to calculate the SCR only using the best estimate liabilities, the approach outlined in this document, or any other alternative approach, is not required. SA QIS2 Annexure 1 2
3 2. Possible Approach Suggested Approach The SAM SCR is based on the principles of economic capital calculation. Expressed in its simplest form this approach involves calculating the change from its base value of a quantity, Own Funds (OF), under a number of pre-defined stress scenarios and aggregating the individual capital requirements to produce the overall diversified SCR. OF in this context represents the excess of assets over liabilities: OF = A L A is defined as the total value of assets on the balance sheet including shareholders funds. L is defined as the total market consistent value of liabilities: L = Market Consistent value of liabilities = BEL for all risks + risk margin in respect of non-hedgeable risks The total market consistent value of liabilities (L) consists of two parts: best estimate value of the risk in respect of hedgeable and non-hedgeable components, plus the risk margin in respect of non-hedgeable risks. The challenge in defining L as the total market consistent value of liabilities is that it includes the risk margin which is calculated on a cost of capital approach. The capital used in this cost of capital is the Solvency Capital Requirement, which is dependent on the variability of OF, leading to circularity as illustrated in the following diagram: SA QIS2 Annexure 1 3
4 In an attempt to resolve this circularity, the SAM framework defines the OF for the purpose of the SCR calculation as (Total Balance Sheet Assets BEL) in order to simplify the calculation. Methodology to the approach: 1. Calculate Stress i : i ϵ {1...m } where there are m non-hedgeable risk driver stresses required for the calculation of the SCR for risk margin purposes as fully described in the QIS2 technical specifications. Here we specifically exclude hedgeable risks (or portions of risks) as the risk margin is based on the cost of capital for non-hedgeable risks alone. For this purpose Stress i is defined to be: Stress i (0) = (A base (0) BEL base (0)) (A i (0) BEL i (0)) Stress i = Solvency Capital Requirement for risk i A = Market value of assets BEL = Best Estimate of Liabilties (excl. Risk Margin) base denotes base case before application of any stress 0 indicates calculation at balance sheet date or T 0 i is the index which indicates which of the m stresses is under consideration This is the standard methodology for the SCR and risk margin calculation tested in SA QIS2. 2. Choose proxies for each non-hedgeable risk i In this step suitable proxies for each of the non-hedgeable risks need to be identified; A suitable proxy for risk i will behave in a similar way to Stress i at the balance sheet in response to changes in the risk drivers or variables which affect its value. In addition the proxy must fairly represent the expected runoff profile of that stress; The use of a deterministic proxy will assist in minimising the burden of the iterative calculation approach described below. 3. Project the best estimate of each proxy over the insurance book s period to run-off The projection period for each risk will be determined individually to be appropriate to that risk as determined by the longest outstanding term of an in-force policy exposed to that risk driver. SA QIS2 Annexure 1 4
5 4. Project the Stress i in respect of each risk driver i using the projected proxies according to the formula below. Stress i (t) = (P i (t) / P i (0)) * Stress i (0) P i (t) is the projected best estimate value of proxy i at time t Stress i (0) is calculated as described in step 1 above in the notation indicates that the quantity has been estimated using a proxy runoff 5. Aggregate the projected Stress i (t) at each future time using the correlation matrix approach set out in the SA QIS2 technical specifications to produce the capital vector SCR (t). 6. As per the standard approach the risk margin is then calculated by multiplying the capital requirement at each future point in time (over the run-off of the book) by the cost of capital rate of 6% p.a. and discounting the cost of capital to the balance sheet date (T 0 ) using the risk free term structure of interest rates. This sum is RM base (0), say, which is the estimated risk margin at balance sheet date using proxies. 7. Now recalculate the market consistent value of the assets and liabilities given that each of the (nonhedgeable) stress events required for the standard formula capital calculation have occurred (taken in turn one at a time). No further clarification is required about recalculation of the BEL post stress k where k ϵ {1...m} these calculations have already been done in step 1 above. The re-estimation of the risk margin within stress k requires further explanation. 8. In stress k we need to estimate the risk margin RM k (0) which is the risk margin at time 0 under stress scenario k. There are once again m non-hedgeable risks to consider within in this scenario, indexed by i as before: Let Stress ki (t) represent the stress or SCR component capital requirement at time t for risk i, after application of stress k to the base balance sheet. 9. For each stress, k ϵ {1...m} the following steps are required: For all hedgeable risks i, i ϵ {1...m}, recalculate the deterministic projected values of the proxy for the SCR for risk i (within the current stress k): P ki (t) for all i and t>=0: Use the proxies to estimate the Stress ki (t) for all i and t>=0: Stress ki (t) (P ki (t) / P i (t)) * Stress i (t) for t >= 0 = (P ki (t) / P i (0)) * Stress i (0) for t >= 0 SA QIS2 Annexure 1 5
6 The projected runoff of each of the risks within scenario k has now been calculated. Aggregate the Stress ki (t) across risks i ϵ {1...m} at each future time t to produce SCR k (t) Multiply SCR k (t) by the cost of capital rate (6% p.a.) and discount to balance sheet date using the risk free term structure (as appropriate to scenario k). If interest rate risk is considered fully hedgeable for the book in question then the term structure will always be identical to the base term structure and the set of risks k ϵ {1...m} will not contain interest rate risk. We now have for each k, an estimate of the risk margin in that scenario: RM k (0). 10. Now repeat step 1 with the following amendment: Stress i (0) = (A base (0) BEL base (0) RM base (0)) (A i (0) BEL i (0) RM i (0)) RM base (0) RM i (0) is calculated in step 9 above Aggregation of these revised Stress i (0) produces a revised non-hedgeable risk SCR at time Re-calculate the risk margin at time 0, RM base (0), using the proxy method for each of the risks i to project each of the stresses recalculated in step 10 over the full run-off period. A key assumption made in this step is that the proxies P i (t) which were originally determined to be adequate proxies for the run-off of the standard approach to each Stress i are also good proxies for the run-off of the modified Stress i which are based on changes in the market consistent value of liabilities, not the BEL in isolation. 12. Iterate steps 9 to 11 until the change in the SCR (step 10) and risk margin (step 11) from one loop to the next produces no material change in the result. Note that no extra model runs are required, the only difference on the next iteration is the new base position calculated in steps 10 and 11. Note that this methodology can be extended to the calculation of the SCR to include the change in risk margin when calculating the stress amounts. The main difference would be the inclusion of hedgeable risks, however hedgeable risks need not be projected in step 9 as they do not influence the risk margin calculated under the stress event k and hence do not affect the calculation of the revised stress amount in step 10. SA QIS2 Annexure 1 6
1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar I - Sub Committee Capital Requirements Task Group Discussion Document 61 (v 1) SCR standard formula: Operational Risk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper (v 3) Loss-absorbing capacity of deferred taxes
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 112 1 (v 3) Loss-absorbing capacity of deferred taxes EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SAM introduces a valuation basis of technical provisions that
More information1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 2. DEFINITIONS
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 28 1 (v 6) Treatment of Expected Profits Included in Future Cash flows as a Capital Resource 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE An insurance
More informationSOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (SAM) FRAMEWORK
SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (SAM) FRAMEWORK Hantie van Heerden Head: Actuarial Insurance Department 5 October 2010 High-level summary of Solvency II Background to SAM Agenda Current Structures Progress
More informationEconomic Capital. Implementing an Internal Model for. Economic Capital ACTUARIAL SERVICES
Economic Capital Implementing an Internal Model for Economic Capital ACTUARIAL SERVICES ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT THIS IS A WHITE PAPER This document belongs to the white paper series authored by Numerica. It
More informationSolvency Projections: What s the point unless you get some value from the results?
Solvency Projections: What s the point unless you get some value from the results? Raymond Bennett and Stefan Strydom Agenda 1. Why solvency projections? 2. A model office approach and case study 3. Applying
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 89 1 (v 2) Calculation of SCR on total balance sheet
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 89 1 (v 2) Calculation of SCR on total balance sheet EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Solvency II, and the specifications for the QIS1 exercise, require
More informationSolvency II SYNDICATE SCR FOR 2014 YEAR OF ACCOUNT. July Supplementary Guidance notes on reserve risk and discounting
Solvency II SYNDICATE SCR FOR 2014 YEAR OF ACCOUNT Supplementary Guidance notes on reserve risk and discounting July 2013 Purpose This note provides numerical illustrations to clarify the treatment of
More informationIAA Fund Seminar in Chinese Taipei
IAA Fund Seminar in Chinese Taipei Solvency II 12 October 2014 Contents 1. What is Solvency II 2. What are the Loose Ends 3. On the Way to IMAP 4. Solvency Regime in Asia Pacific What is Solvency II -Solvency
More informationDiscussion Document 105 (v 3) was approved as a Position Paper by Steering Committee on 12 September
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 1Sub Committee Capital Requirements Task Group Position Paper 105 1 (v 3) Market Risk SCR Structure and Correlations EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document discusses
More informationSolvency II and Mandatum Life. Sampo Group, Capital Markets Day 11 September 2015
Solvency II and Mandatum Life Sampo Group, Capital Markets Day 11 September 2015 Solvency II in a Nutshell New EU-level solvency framework In force 1 January 2016 Risks are measured in a market consistent
More information1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 1 - Sub Committee Technical Provisions Task Group Discussion Document 87 (v 6) Future Management Actions in Technical Provisions EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationTools for testing the Solvency Capital Requirement for life insurance. Mariarosaria Coppola 1, Valeria D Amato 2
Tools for testing the Solvency Capital Requirement for life insurance Mariarosaria Coppola 1, Valeria D Amato 2 1 Department of Theories and Methods of Human and Social Sciences,University of Naples Federico
More informations Solvency Capital Requirement for undertakings on Standard Formula
s.25.01 Requirement for undertakings on Standard Formula This section relates to opening and annual submission of information for individual entities, ring fenced funds, matching adjustment portfolios
More informationRelated topic Subtopic No. Para. Your question Answer
25 June 2014 Related topic Subtopic No. Para. Your question Answer Valuation V.2.5. Risk margin TP5.4 Under the risk margin transfer scenario there is an assumption that the receiving entity invests its
More informationCEIOPS-DOC-27/09. (former CP32) October 2009
CEIOPS-DOC-27/09 CEIOPS Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: Technical Provisions - Assumptions about Future Management Actions (former CP32) October 2009 CEIOPS e.v. Westhafenplatz
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper (v 4) Life SCR - Retrenchment Risk
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 108 1 (v 4) Life SCR - Retrenchment Risk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document discusses the structure and calibration of the proposed Retrenchment
More informationAppointed Actuary Symposium 2007 Solvency II Update
watsonwyatt.com Appointed Actuary Symposium 2007 Solvency II Update Naomi Burger 7 November 2007 Agenda Overview Pillar 1 - Capital requirements Pillar 2 - Supervisory review Pillar 3 - Disclosure Conclusions
More informationRISK BASED CAPITAL AND SOLVENCY
RISK BASED CAPITAL AND SOLVENCY 1 1 N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 5 N E I L TAV E R N E R, S E N I O R A C T U A R Y AIMS OF RISK BASED CAPITAL AND SOLVENCY WORKSTREAM Establish a high level of observance of IAIS
More informationEcon 424/CFRM 462 Portfolio Risk Budgeting
Econ 424/CFRM 462 Portfolio Risk Budgeting Eric Zivot August 14, 2014 Portfolio Risk Budgeting Idea: Additively decompose a measure of portfolio risk into contributions from the individual assets in the
More information2.1 Pursuant to article 18D of the Act, an authorised undertaking shall, except where otherwise provided for, value:
Valuation of assets and liabilities, technical provisions, own funds, Solvency Capital Requirement, Minimum Capital Requirement and investment rules (Solvency II Pillar 1 Requirements) 1. Introduction
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 73 1 (v 3) Treatment of new business in SCR
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 73 1 (v 3) Treatment of new business in SCR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As for the Solvency II Framework Directive and IAIS guidance, the risk
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 44 1 (v 4) Concentration Risk
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 44 1 (v 4) Concentration Risk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document discusses the structure and calibration of the concentration risk sub-module
More information[ALL FACTORS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE ILLUSTRATIVE AND DO NOT PRE-EMPT A SEPARATE DISCUSSION ON CALIBRATION]
26 Boulevard Haussmann F 75009 Paris Tél. : +33 1 44 83 11 83 Fax : +33 1 47 70 03 75 www.cea.assur.org Square de Meeûs, 29 B 1000 Bruxelles Tél. : +32 2 547 58 11 Fax : +32 2 547 58 19 www.cea.assur.org
More informationComments on: The revised Standardised Approach to Market Risk - Update on revised Accord texts
15 April 2014 Mr Ju Quan Tan BCBS Secretariat Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Bank for International Settlements CH-4002 Basel Switzerland Doc Ref: Your ref: Direct : +27 11 645 6708 E- : garyh@banking.org.za
More informationEIOPA15/ Nov 2015
EIOPA15/821 19 Nov 2015 Call for evidence concerning the request to ΕΙΟΡΑ for further technical advice on the identification and calibration of other infrastructure investment risk categories i.e. infrastructure
More informationSolvency II Detailed guidance notes for dry run process. March 2010
Solvency II Detailed guidance notes for dry run process March 2010 Introduction The successful implementation of Solvency II at Lloyd s is critical to maintain the competitive position and capital advantages
More informationORSA An International Development
ORSA An International Development 25.02.14 Agenda What is an ORSA? Global reach Comparison of requirements Common challenges Potential solutions Origin of ORSA FSA ICAS Solvency II IAIS ICP16 What is an
More informationCEIOPS-DOC January 2010
CEIOPS-DOC-72-10 29 January 2010 CEIOPS Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: Technical Provisions Article 86 h Simplified methods and techniques to calculate technical provisions (former
More informationAn Introduction to Solvency II
An Introduction to Solvency II Peter Withey KPMG Agenda 1. Background to Solvency II 2. Pillar 1: Quantitative Pillar Basic building blocks Assets Technical Reserves Solvency Capital Requirement Internal
More informationConsultation Paper. the draft proposal for. Guidelines. on the implementation of the long term. guarantee adjustments and transitional.
EIOPA-CP-14/049 27 November 2014 Consultation Paper on the draft proposal for Guidelines on the implementation of the long term guarantee adjustments and transitional measures EIOPA WesthafenTower Westhafenplatz
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 2 - Sub Committee ORSA and Use Test Task Group Discussion Document 35 (v 3) Use Test
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 2 - Sub Committee ORSA and Use Test Task Group Discussion Document 35 (v 3) Use Test EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The purpose of this document
More informationChristos Patsalides President Cyprus Association of Actuaries
Christos Patsalides President Cyprus Association of Actuaries 1 Counter Party (Default) Risk Reinsurance Intermediaries Banks (cash at bank current ac/s only) Other Operational Risk Systems Risks Processes
More informationHong Kong RBC First Quantitative Impact Study
Milliman Asia e-alert 1 17 August 2017 Hong Kong RBC First Quantitative Impact Study Introduction On 28 July 2017, the Insurance Authority (IA) of Hong Kong released the technical specifications for the
More informationSupervisory Statement SS7/17 Solvency II: Data collection of market risk sensitivities. October 2017
Supervisory Statement SS7/17 Solvency II: Data collection of market risk sensitivities October 2017 Prudential Regulation Authority 20 Moorgate London EC2R 6DA Supervisory Statement SS7/17 Solvency II:
More informationSolvency II overview
Solvency II overview David Payne, FIA Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar 21 September 2010 INTNL-2: Solvency II - Update and Current Events Antitrust Notice The Casualty Actuarial Society is committed to adhering
More informationChallenger Life Company Limited Comparability of capital requirements across different regulatory regimes
Challenger Life Company Limited Comparability of capital requirements across different regulatory regimes 26 August 2014 Challenger Life Company Limited Level 15 255 Pitt Street Sydney NSW 2000 26 August
More informationCEIOPS-DOC-35/09. (former CP 41) October 2009
CEIOPS-DOC-35/09 CEIOPS Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: Technical Provisions Article 86(c) Circumstances in which technical provisions shall be calculated as a whole (former CP
More informationRisk aggregation in Solvency II : How to converge the approaches of the internal models and those of the standard formula?
Risk aggregation in Solvency II : How to converge the approaches of the internal models and those of the standard formula? - Laurent DEVINEAU (Université Lyon 1, Laboratoire SAF, Milliman Paris) - Stéphane
More informationFinal Report on public consultation No. 14/049 on Guidelines on the implementation of the long-term guarantee measures
EIOPA-BoS-15/111 30 June 2015 Final Report on public consultation No. 14/049 on Guidelines on the implementation of the long-term guarantee measures EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt
More informationECO-SLV Date: 27 January Contact person: Ecofin department
Position Paper Solvency II: resolving the currency risk problem Our reference: Referring to: ECO-SLV-12-048 Date: 27 January 2012 Solvency II Contact person: Ecofin department E-mail: ecofin@insuranceeurope.eu
More informationMarket Consistent Economic Profit (MCEP)*
Ri$k Minds 2007 Geneva, 10-14 December 2007 Market Consistent Economic Profit (MCEP)* Linking Risk, Value and Strategy PricewaterhouseCoopers Conor O Dowd and Mark Young * Please note that the basic concept
More informationComments on EIOPA s advice on interest rate risk in its second set of advice to EC (EIOPA-BoS-18/075)
2018-05-21 Comments on EIOPA s advice on interest rate risk in its second set of advice to EC (EIOPA-BoS-18/075) On February 28, 2018, EIOPA published its second set of advice to the European Commission
More informationJudging the appropriateness of the Standard Formula under Solvency II
Judging the appropriateness of the Standard Formula under Solvency II Steven Hooghwerff, AAG Roel van der Kamp, CFA, FRM Sinéad Clarke, FSAI, FIA, BAFS 1 Introduction Solvency II, which went live on January
More informationPRA RULEBOOK: SOLVENCY II FIRMS: SOLVENCY CAPITAL REQUIREMENT - GENERAL PROVISIONS INSTRUMENT 2015
PRA RULEBOOK: SOLVENCY II FIRMS: SOLVENCY CAPITAL REQUIREMENT - GENERAL PROVISIONS INSTRUMENT 2015 Powers exercised A. The Prudential Regulation Authority ( PRA ) makes this instrument in the exercise
More informationCEIOPS-DOC-61/10 January Former Consultation Paper 65
CEIOPS-DOC-61/10 January 2010 CEIOPS Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: Partial internal models Former Consultation Paper 65 CEIOPS e.v. Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt Germany Tel.
More informationBest Estimate Technical Provisions
Solvency II - QIS5 Non-Life Technical Provisions 15 September 2010 Dimitris Dimitriou 1 Best Estimate Technical Provisions 1 Agenda 1. Segmentation 2. Future Premiums 3. Valuation Techniques 4. Simplifications
More information29th India Fellowship Seminar
29th India Fellowship Seminar Is Risk Based Capital way forward? Adaptability to Indian Context & Comparison of various market consistent measures Guide: Sunil Sharma Presented by: Rakesh Kumar Niraj Kumar
More informationModelling the Sharpe ratio for investment strategies
Modelling the Sharpe ratio for investment strategies Group 6 Sako Arts 0776148 Rik Coenders 0777004 Stefan Luijten 0783116 Ivo van Heck 0775551 Rik Hagelaars 0789883 Stephan van Driel 0858182 Ellen Cardinaels
More informationSolvency projections: what s the point unless you get some value from the results?
Solvency projections: what s the point unless you get some value from the results? By Raymond Bennett and Stefan Strydom Presented at the Actuarial Society of South Africa s 2014 Convention 22 23 October
More informationOperations Research. Chapter 8
QM 350 Operations Research Chapter 8 Case Study: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ANALYSIS Let us consider the accounts receivable situation for Heidman s Department Store. Heidman s uses two aging categories for its
More informationSWEDBANK FÖRSÄKRING AB European Embedded Value
SWEDBANK FÖRSÄKRING AB 2014 European Embedded Value Content 1 Introduction... 2 2 Overview of results... 2 3 Covered business... 2 4 EEV results... 2 5 Value of new business... 3 6 Analysis of EEV earnings...
More informationSupervisory Statement SS12/15 Solvency II: Lloyd s. March Appendix 2.12
Supervisory Statement SS12/15 Solvency II: Lloyd s March 2015 Appendix 2.12 Prudential Regulation Authority 20 Moorgate London EC2R 6DA Prudential Regulation Authority, registered office: 8 Lothbury, London
More informationLIFE INSURANCE & WEALTH MANAGEMENT PRACTICE COMMITTEE
Contents 1. Purpose 2. Background 3. Nature of Asymmetric Risks 4. Existing Guidance & Legislation 5. Valuation Methodologies 6. Best Estimate Valuations 7. Capital & Tail Distribution Valuations 8. Management
More information1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar I - Sub Committee Capital Resources and Capital Requirements Task Groups Discussion Document 53 (v 10) Treatment of participations in the solo entity submission
More informationThe Solvency II project and the work of CEIOPS
Thomas Steffen CEIOPS Chairman Budapest, 16 May 07 The Solvency II project and the work of CEIOPS Outline Reasons for a change in the insurance EU regulatory framework The Solvency II project Drivers Process
More informationSession 030 PD - PBR Stochastic Reserve - Challenges and Possible Solutions. Moderator: Sebastien Cimon Gagnon, FSA, CERA, MAAA
Session 030 PD - PBR Stochastic Reserve - Challenges and Possible Solutions Moderator: Sebastien Cimon Gagnon, FSA, CERA, MAAA Presenters: Timothy C. Cardinal, FSA, CERA, MAAA Andrew G. Steenman, FSA,
More informationby Aurélie Reacfin s.a. March 2016
Non-Life Deferred Taxes ORSA: under Solvency The II forward-looking challenge by Aurélie Miller* @ Reacfin s.a. March 2016 The Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) is one of the most talked about requirements
More information1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 1 Sub Committee Capital Requirements Task Group Discussion Document 74 (v 3) Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Having compared the IAIS ICPs
More informationFeedback on Solvency II Draft Directive
5 October 2007 Feedback on Solvency II Draft Directive Chief Risk Officer Forum Copyright 2007 Chief Risk Officer Forum Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary... 3 2 Introduction... 5 3 The CRO Forum Solvency
More informationTechnical Specifications part II on the Long-Term Guarantee Assessment Final version
EIOPA/12/307 25 January 2013 Technical Specifications part II on the Long-Term Guarantee Assessment Final version Purpose of this document This document contains part II of the technical specifications
More informationSolvency II and Technical Provisions Dealing with the risk margin
GIRO conference and exhibition 2010 Kendra Felisky, Ayuk Akoh-Arrey & Elizabeth Cabrera Solvency II and Technical Provisions Dealing with the risk margin 14th October 2010 Risk Margin Topics to cover:
More informationRETURN AND RISK: The Capital Asset Pricing Model
RETURN AND RISK: The Capital Asset Pricing Model (BASED ON RWJJ CHAPTER 11) Return and Risk: The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) Know how to calculate expected returns Understand covariance, correlation,
More informationThe valuation of insurance liabilities under Solvency 2
The valuation of insurance liabilities under Solvency 2 Introduction Insurance liabilities being the core part of an insurer s balance sheet, the reliability of their valuation is the very basis to assess
More informationSolvency assessment regime for South African medical schemes
Solvency assessment regime for South African medical schemes By GI Scott and AN Lowe Presented at the Actuarial Society of South Africa s 2015 Convention 17 18 November 2015, Sandton Convention Centre
More informationCalculating the IFRS 17 Risk Adjustment
IFRS 17 Series Author Cassandra Hannibal, FIA Moody s Analytics Research Contact Us Americas +1.212.553.1653 clientservices@moodys.com Europe +44.20.7772.5454 clientservices.emea@moodys.com Asia (Excluding
More informationALD Re DAC SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT
2017 ALD Re DAC SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 Chapter A. Business and Performance 4 A.1 Business 5 A.2 Underwriting performance 6 A.3 Investment performance
More informationWHITE PAPER. Solvency II Compliance and beyond: Title The essential steps for insurance firms
WHITE PAPER Solvency II Compliance and beyond: Title The essential steps for insurance firms ii Contents Introduction... 1 Step 1 Data Management... 1 Step 2 Risk Calculations... 3 Solvency Capital Requirement
More informationComments Template on CP12003 Draft Technical Specifications QIS IORP II
Name of Company: Association of Consulting Actuaries UK Disclosure of comments: Public Please follow the following instructions for filling in the template: Do not change the numbering in the column reference
More informationREINSURANCE CONTRIBUTION UNDER SOLVENCY II STANDARD APPROACH (RISA)
REINSURANCE CONTRIBUTION UNDER SOLVENCY II STANDARD APPROACH (RISA) Athens, 19 May 211 & Nicosia, 2 May 211 Dr. Norbert Kuschel Solvency Consulting, Integrated Risk Management Agenda 1. Quantitative case
More informationStat 476 Life Contingencies II. Profit Testing
Stat 476 Life Contingencies II Profit Testing Profit Testing Profit testing is commonly done by actuaries in life insurance companies. It s useful for a number of reasons: Setting premium rates or testing
More informationRe: Possible Solvency and Financial Condition Report components subject to assurance
Ms Sandra Hack European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) Westhafenplatz 1 D-60327 Frankfurt am Main 10 January 2012 Ref.: INS/PRJ/SKU/IDS Dear Ms Hack, Re: Possible Solvency and Financial
More informationStandardized Approach for Calculating the Solvency Buffer for Market Risk. Joint Committee of OSFI, AMF, and Assuris.
Standardized Approach for Calculating the Solvency Buffer for Market Risk Joint Committee of OSFI, AMF, and Assuris November 2008 DRAFT FOR COMMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...3 Approach to Market
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 47 1 (v 4) Equity Risk
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 47 1 (v 4) Equity Risk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE This discussion document considered the IAIS standards and guidance,
More informationMartingale Pricing Theory in Discrete-Time and Discrete-Space Models
IEOR E4707: Foundations of Financial Engineering c 206 by Martin Haugh Martingale Pricing Theory in Discrete-Time and Discrete-Space Models These notes develop the theory of martingale pricing in a discrete-time,
More informationSummary of Comments on CEIOPS-CP-41/09 Consultation Paper on the Draft L2 Advice on TP - Calculation as a whole
CEIOPS would like to thank Association of British Insurers, AVOE Aktuarvereinigung Österreichs Actuarial, CEA, CFO Forum, CRO Forum, European Union member firms of Deloitte Touche To, Federation of European
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee. Position Paper 6 1 (v 1)
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 6 1 (v 1) Interim Measures relating to Technical Provisions and Capital Requirements for Short-term Insurers 1 Discussion Document
More informationWith-Profits Actuary
SCOTTISH EQUITABLE PLC Report of the With-Profits Actuary on the proposed transfer of business from BlackRock Life Limited to Scottish Equitable plc pursuant to Part VII of the Financial Services and Markets
More informationEqualities. Equalities
Equalities Working with Equalities There are no special rules to remember when working with equalities, except for two things: When you add, subtract, multiply, or divide, you must perform the same operation
More informationAIG Life Insurance Company (Switzerland) Ltd. Financial Condition Report 2017
AIG Life Insurance Company (Switzerland) Ltd. Financial Condition Report 2017 30 April 2018 Contents Executive Summary... 3 A. BUSINESS... 5 A.1 COMPANY INFORMATION... 5 A.2 POSITION WITHIN THE GROUP LEGAL
More informationLife under Solvency II Be prepared!
Life under Solvency II Be prepared! Moderator: Hugh Rosenbaum, Towers Watson Speakers: Tomas Wittbjer, Global Head of Insurance, IKANO SA Lorraine Stack, Marsh Management Services Dublin Session Overview
More informationINSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES OF INDIA. GN31: GN on the Financial Condition Assessment Report for General Insurance Companies
INSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES OF INDIA GN31: GN on the Financial Condition Assessment Report for General Insurance Companies Classification: Recommended Practice Legislation or Authority: 1. The Insurance Act
More informationAgile Capital Modelling. Contents
Agile Capital Modelling Contents Introduction Capital modelling Capital modelling snakes and ladders Software development Agile software development Agile capital modelling 1 Capital Modelling Objectives
More informationDisclosure of Market Consistent Embedded Value as of March 31, 2016
May 23, 2016 Sony Life Insurance Co., Ltd. Disclosure of Market Consistent Embedded Value as of March 31, 2016 Tokyo, May 23, 2016 Sony Life Insurance Co., Ltd. ( Sony Life ), a wholly owned subsidiary
More informationLecture 3: Factor models in modern portfolio choice
Lecture 3: Factor models in modern portfolio choice Prof. Massimo Guidolin Portfolio Management Spring 2016 Overview The inputs of portfolio problems Using the single index model Multi-index models Portfolio
More informationSolvency Monitoring and
Solvency Monitoring and Reporting Venkatasubramanian A CILA2006/AV 1 Intro No amount of capital can substitute for the capacity to understand, measure and manage risk and no formula or model can capture
More informationQUANTITATIVE IMPACT STUDY NO. 5 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
QUANTITATIVE IMPACT STUDY NO. 5 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS The purpose of this study is to gather information to evaluate a number of potential methods for determining the capital requirements related to market,
More informationUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS DEPARTEMENT OF MATHEMATICS ACTUARIAL SCIENCE
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS DEPARTEMENT OF MATHEMATICS ACTUARIAL SCIENCE Solvency II for an insurance company in Europe Prepared by Changyu Yin Hanmiao Shen Mentor: Klara Buysse June 15, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENT
More informationUPDATE ON PROGRESS WITH THE SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (SAM) PROJECT
Riverwalk Office Park Block B 41 Matroosberg Road Ashlea Gardens Extension 6 Pretoria South Africa 0081 PO Box 35655 Menlo Park Pretoria South Africa 0102 Tel +27 12 428 8000 Fax +27 12 346 6941 E-mail
More informationValuation Problems in Models for Solvency II. Workshop report IP/A/ECON/WS/ PE Directorate-General for Internal Policies
Directorate-General for Internal Policies Directorate A - Economic and Scientific Policy Policy Department A.: Economic and Scientific Policy and Quality of Life Unit Valuation Problems in Models for Solvency
More informationJanuary CNB opinion on Commission consultation document on Solvency II implementing measures
NA PŘÍKOPĚ 28 115 03 PRAHA 1 CZECH REPUBLIC January 2011 CNB opinion on Commission consultation document on Solvency II implementing measures General observations We generally agree with the Commission
More informationStrategic Asset Allocation and Risk Budgeting for Insurers under Solvency II
Strategic Asset Allocation and Risk Budgeting for Insurers under Solvency II Roy Kouwenberg Mahidol University, College of Management Erasmus University Rotterdam November 14, 2017 Note: this research
More informationChallenges in developing internal models for Solvency II
NFT 2/2008 Challenges in developing internal models for Solvency II by Vesa Ronkainen, Lasse Koskinen and Laura Koskela Vesa Ronkainen vesa.ronkainen@vakuutusvalvonta.fi In the EU the supervision of the
More informationSolvency II implementation measures CEIOPS advice Third set November AMICE core messages
Solvency II implementation measures CEIOPS advice Third set November 2009 AMICE core messages AMICE s high-level messages with regard to the third wave of consultations by CEIOPS on their advice for Solvency
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 68 1 (v 4) SCR: Simplifications for First Party Insurance Structures
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 68 1 (v 4) SCR: Simplifications for First Party Insurance Structures 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE This document contains the proposed
More informationLocal Government Pension Scheme in Scotland Statutory Guidance Assessment of Member Contribution Rate. Important - Please Note
Version 2 Issued 12 February 2009 Local Government Pension Scheme in Scotland Statutory Guidance Assessment of Member Contribution Rate Important - Please Note When allocating a contribution rate to members,
More informationMAIF s contribution to CEIOPS s Consultation Papers n 19 and 20
MAIF s contribution to CEIOPS s Consultation Papers n 19 and 20 The text above constitutes MAIF s response to CEIOPS s CP 19 and 20. Some elements to present MAIF Group, a mutual insurer essentially established
More informationModel Change. Appendix to the guidance notes VALIDATION ACTIVITY FOR DIFFERING CHANGE TYPES. July 2016
Model Change Appendix to the guidance notes VALIDATION ACTIVITY FOR DIFFERING CHANGE TYPES July 2016 1 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK 2 Contents Purpose... 5 Summary of requirements... 6 Common examples
More informationIgloo Standard Formula. Simplifying the SCR Solvency II calculation
Igloo Standard Formula Simplifying the SCR Solvency II calculation Approximately 60% of the UK market (by premium income, and excluding Lloyd s) use Igloo to support their Solvency II requirements. 9 of
More informationReport on QIS on IORPs. Barthold Kuipers, Chair OPC Subgroup QIS QIS for Pensions closing event Frankfurt, 10 July 2013
Report on QIS on IORPs Barthold Kuipers, Chair OPC Subgroup QIS QIS for Pensions closing event Frankfurt, Outline Holistic balance sheet Participation in QIS Benchmark scenario Upper and lower bound scenario
More information