Energy and Public Utility Trends and Issues
|
|
- Angelica Weaver
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Energy and Public Utility Trends and Issues What happens if customers cut the wire? 2014 CAMPUT Energy Regulation Course Bob Heggie, Chief Executive, Alberta Utilities Commission
2 Disclaimer The views and comments expressed in this presentation are my own and do not represent the views or positions of the Alberta Utilities Commission. Treatment of the issues discussed in this presentation will vary on a case-by-case basis; the outcome will be dependent on the facts of the case, applicable federal and provincial laws and previous tribunal and court decisions. 2
3 Regulatory decisions must comply with applicable legislation and legal principles. Principles 1. Regulatory compact 2. Prudence 3. Used and useful (required to be used) 4. Cost of capital / fair return Discussion application of principles to a potential fact pattern. 3
4 Regulatory problem Regulatory problem: whether utility investors or customers should bear the risk of excess, and potentially stranded, capacity costs? Transmission system began operations decades ago as a natural monopoly. Transmission system is planned and built on an integrated basis. Applications to build facilities are determined based on need and the public interest. Prudently incurred costs are approved by the regulator in rate base, including a return on equity on a capital structure that reflects business and regulatory risk. Economy grows, system is built to a larger and larger territory, in anticipation of a larger load rate base grows into the billions. 4
5 Regulatory problem Customers are responsible for paying for the transmission system through wire rates based on average cost of transmission build. Load disappears due to disruptive technology (distributed generation), potentially stranding costs that need to be absorbed. Wire company seeks a rate increase for it s business of 30+ %, plus an increase in the return on equity and the equity component of the capital structure. Current environment will result in rate increases continuing. Applying regulatory principles how would you argue this case? 5
6 Cost treatment options Standby capacity Adjust depreciation rates Stranded Still used and required to be used Left in rate base Collect return of and on investment Remaining customers bear the cost of return of and on overbuilt plant Current and future obsolescence is recognized and taken into account when establishing depreciation rates Depreciation expense is accelerated in recognition of uncompetitive plant remaining in rate base Current customers pay for remaining plant investment through depreciation rates Return on investment No longer used or required to be used Options - No disallowance - Partial disallowance - Complete denial of cost recovery - Various methods of accounting facts will drive outcomes 6
7 Depreciation methodology Depreciation is designed to return full capital investment over the life of an asset. Mass property accounts group similar assets and estimate an expected service life for the assets based on actual experience and observed risks. Some assets may be retired early, some may remain in service longer. These differences are captured over time and trued up by amortizing the difference over the balance of the remaining assets. In this way ordinary stranding of assets is contemplated and accounted for. Extraordinary stranding occurs when assets are no longer required for utility service due to reasons not contemplated in the depreciation methodology. 7
8 Regulatory compact (1) An economic and social arrangement that ensures customers access and receives service at a fair price. Regulated utilities are given the exclusive right to sell their services within a specific area at rates that will provide companies with the opportunity to earn a fair return for their investors. In return for this right of exclusivity, utilities assume a duty to adequately and reliably serve all customers in their determined territories, and are required to have their rates and certain operations regulated. ATCO Gas & Pipelines Ltd. V. Alberta (Energy and Utilities Board), [2006] 1S.C.R. 140, 2006 SCC 4 at para. 63 8
9 Regulatory compact (2) The regulatory compact balances the interests of investors and consumers. Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited v. Ontario Energy Board, 2010 ONCA 284 at para. 49; Great Lakes Power v. Ontario Energy Board, 2010 ONCA 399 at para. 24 BUT 9
10 Regulatory compact (3) Regulatory compact is not absolute While the utility is obligated to serve all customers, due to it being granted an exclusive monopoly franchise area, there is no reciprocal obligation to buy on the part of the customers. Utility has no right to monopoly protection for competitive services. Ontario Energy Board Decision EB , p. 33 The regulatory compact is not static, but may change over time due to evolving circumstances like the advent of competition. 10
11 Regulatory compact (4) The expression regulatory compact is an expression the Board has not itself specifically articulated. We are not prepared to endorse the concept of the regulatory compact as a concept that compels the Board to set just and reasonable tolls in a particular manner. In our view, the concept is ill defined. TransCanada s interpretation of the regulatory compact would have the effect of protecting the mainline from the impact of competition. Some interveners contended that the concept protects them from a pipeline s market power. We are of the view that the differing characterizations of the regulatory compact evidences a fundamental flaw in using the concept to set just and reasonable tolls: the regulatory compact means different things to different people. National Energy Board decision RH at p
12 Regulatory compact (5) Arguments The regulatory compact means the regulator must allow the utility a reasonable opportunity to recover its costs. The opportunity to recovery of and return on investment must reflect the risks imposed by the regulatory compact on the utility. The traditional risks do not include the disruptive technology risk that a customer could leave the system entirely or only rely on the system for backup purposes after the utility had incurred a year cost recovery investment to serve that customer. OR The regulatory compact is not absolute and the utility has no right to monopoly protection for competitive services. While in some circumstances remaining customers act as guarantors of recovery of costs to serve departing customers, generally the risk that customers will cease to use a utility s services is generally assumed by the utility. This is a market risk for which the utility is compensated. 12
13 Prudence (1) The prudent investment test establishes that investments are assumed to have been made based on reasonable judgment, unless the contrary is shown. This test has been interpreted as establishing a rebuttable presumption of prudence. This reverses the onus so that interveners are obliged to demonstrate mismanagement, inefficiency or bad faith to overcome the presumption. See: State of Missouri ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission, 262 U.S. 276, 289 (1923) Brandeis J. concurring. Re Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co., 57 PUR 3 rd 1, 7 (D.C.P.S.C., 1864) ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. V. Alberta (Energy and Utilities Board) 2005 ABCA
14 Prudence (2) Arguments The facilities were approved in the public interest when built. The regulator issued an approval to construct based on a demonstrated need. The costs arising from the investment were prudent when put into rate base and included in just and reasonable rates. Prudence determines the opportunity for cost recovery. OR Including prudently incurred costs in rates provides a utility the opportunity to recover these costs. Whether costs that were prudent at the time they were first incurred continue to be prudent depends on the circumstances faced by the utility. Prudency is not the only standard that determines the opportunity for cost recovery. Failure to take timely action to mitigate cost impacts resulting from market changes could be imprudent. 14
15 Used and useful (1) Facilities that are used (actually operating in the course of providing service to the customer) and useful (necessary to provide service in an economic fashion) remain in rate base. A utility receives return of and on capital employed related to those facility investments. (In Alberta the test is used or required to be used.) The words used or required to be used are intended to identify assets that are presently used, are reasonably used, and are likely to be used in the future to provide services. Specifically, the past or historical use of assets will not permit their inclusion in rate base unless they continue to be used in the system. See: ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. v. Alberta (Energy and Utilities Board) 2008 ABCA 200, at paras. 23 and 25 ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. v. Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2009 ABCA 246, para. 56 Prudence seeks to evaluate management s performance, while used and useful is largely an economic concept used to reflect market conditions or the continuing need for the facility to provide utility service. 15
16 Used and useful (2) Arguments Utilities are allowed a reasonable opportunity to recover their prudently incurred costs regardless of whether the asset remains used and useful in the provision of service, provided that management imprudence does not contribute to underutilization. To disallow costs that were prudently incurred would be confiscatory. The cost of underutilization goes to the consumer, not the shareholder. Prudence trumps used and useful. OR A utility investment that is no longer used and useful in providing service because it is technologically or economically obsolete can be excluded from rate base. A utility is not guaranteed a recovery of its costs and a reasonable return on their investment, the compact requires a utility be afforded the opportunity to earn a fair return and has never meant that under all circumstances the utility will recover a return. Technological and competitive risks do not bar a utility from competing to maintain market share, it will have to adjust its price or it will result in a partial financial write-down. As the utility continues to own the asset and the opportunity to earn on the investment was afforded to the utility, it is not confiscation of utility property. 16
17 Used and useful (2) Arguments See: National Energy Board RH TransCanada Pipelines Mainline decision, pp Alberta Utilities Commission decision (Utility Asset Disposition) pp [Not absolute where it can be shown, for example, that government or a governmental agency required certain costs to be incurred, the utility s claim for recovery may have merit.] 17
18 Fair return (1) Utilities are funded by equity and debt. Entitled to the opportunity to recover their cost of capital a return on the equity and debt invested in the facilities providing service. Overall the return must meet the fair return standard. Three elements of fair return standard applied to ROE: 1. Comparable investment return commensurate with returns available from investments of similar risk. 2. Financial integrity maintains financial integrity of the utility. 3. Capital attraction attract capital or reasonable terms and conditions. 18
19 Fair return (2) Return on equity is a cost to be objectively determined. Return on debt is actual (prudent) incurred cost of debt. The return on equity must reflect the business risks facing the utility. Whether the investor or customer should bear the risk of extraordinary stranding of assets depends on whether the investor has been compensated for bearing the risk that the utility service could be displaced by a generation technological advance a competitor to wires. 19
20 Fair return (3) Arguments Utilities are compensated Rates of return reflect the potential that market conditions may change resulting in lost sales for a utility. This includes the risk that technology advancements may result in competitive pressures that will result in customers having viable alternate service offerings. Utilities knew or should have known that these risks would increase likelihood of lost revenues including the risk that facilities would no longer be required for service and did or should have sought adjustments in depreciation rates and rates of return. Utilities are not compensated Utilities have been historically compensated for traditional market risks of customers fuel switching or self-generating, not for extraordinary risks caused by disruptive technology which could not have been foreseen. This new risk and its sudden occurrence changes a utility s business risk in a fundamental way for which the utility has not been compensated. 20
21 Risk (1) Questions 1. Are regulators required to explicitly provide a competition or technological risk premium when calculating fair return? 2. Can that be done with any degree of precision? 3. When the equity of a pure play utility trades in the market, is there an empirical method for determining whether investors have already internalized competitive and technological risks? If not, can it be assumed that the market has priced this risk? 4. Is there an obligation or onus on a utility to request an equity return that is commensurate with competitive and technological risks? 5. If so, how can a regulator determine when a utility should have become aware of these risks? 21
22 Risk (2) If there is no evidence that a utility has either explicitly or implicitly been compensated for competitive and technological risks, should customers bear any portion of the stranded costs? 22
23 Risk (3) Arguments Once assets are no longer used or required to be used for utility service, they are removed from rate base and any stranded investment (not recoverable through depreciation reserve) is borne by the investor, whether they have been compensated for that risk or not. Utility investors own utility property and bear all risks, including ex post stranded costs and benefits. Regulatory compact provides an opportunity. Utilities must anticipate impacts of competitive pressures and technological advances and adjust depreciation schedules or offer alternate services to ensure grid parity. Regulatory compact requires opportunity for return of an investment. The return must be fair and reflective of investment risks. Here risks were not anticipated and there is no evidence the utility was being compensated. OR 23
PRUDENCE, STRANDED ASSETS, AND THE REGULATION OF UTILITIES: A REVIEW OF ALBERTA UTILITY REGULATORY PRINCIPLES IN A POST-STORES BLOCK ERA
POST-STORES BLOCK ALBERTA UTILITIES REGULATORY PRINCIPLES 403 PRUDENCE, STRANDED ASSETS, AND THE REGULATION OF UTILITIES: A REVIEW OF ALBERTA UTILITY REGULATORY PRINCIPLES IN A POST-STORES BLOCK ERA LOU
More information2.1 THE PUBLIC INTEREST STANDARD APPLIES TO TRANSFER APPLICATIONS
Energy East Pipeline Ltd. CA PDF Page 1 of 8 Section 2 2.0 REGULATORY STANDARDS Past NEB decisions indicate that the regulatory standards to be considered and applied in applications for leave to transfer
More informationCase Name: Power Workers' Union, Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 1000 v. Ontario (Energy Board)
Page 1 Case Name: Power Workers' Union, Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 1000 v. Ontario (Energy Board) Between Power Workers' Union, Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 1000, Appellants,
More informationATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd.
Decision 2738-D01-2016 Z Factor Application for Recovery of 2013 Southern Alberta Flood Costs March 16, 2016 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 2738-D01-2016 Z Factor Application for Recovery of 2013
More informationIN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c.15 (Schedule B)
Ontario Energy Board Commission de l énergie de l Ontario EB-2007-0744 IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c.15 (Schedule B) AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by Great Lakes
More informationNorth Parcels: Plan A1, Block 63, Lots 1-20 South Parcels: Plan A1, Block 63, Lots 21-40, and the buildings located thereon.
ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD Calgary, Alberta ATCO GAS AND PIPELINES LTD. DISPOSITION OF CALGARY STORES BLOCK AND DISTRIBUTION OF NET PROCEEDS PART 2 Decision 2002-037 Application No. 1247130 File
More informationATCO Pipelines ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. CU Inc. Canadian Utilities Limited
Decision 2012-068 Disposition of Surplus Salt Cavern Assets in the Fort Saskatchewan Area March 16, 2012 The Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 2012-068:,,, Disposition of Surplus Salt Cavern Assets
More informationThe Regulatory Compact - A Means to Social Justice? October 31, 2013 Jeff Christian
The Regulatory Compact - A Means to Social Justice? October 31, 2013 Jeff Christian Introduction regulatory compact : the benefits and burdens imposed on public utilities public utilities : monopoly suppliers
More informationGovernance Issues for Municipalities and their LDCs
Governance Issues for Municipalities and their LDCs Robert B. Warren, WeirFoulds LLP Daniel P. Ferguson, WeirFoulds LLP A presentation for the Council for Clean and Reliable Electricity Conference To Own
More informationMay 29, The International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London, UK EC4M 6XH. To Whom It May Concern:
May 29, 2013 The International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London, UK EC4M 6XH To Whom It May Concern: RE: Request for Information: Rate Regulation CAMPUT, Canada s Energy and Utility Regulators,
More informationOntario Energy Board s (OEB S) Response to the. International Accounting Standards Board s. Request for Information on Rate Regulation
Ontario Energy Board s (OEB S) Response to the International Accounting Standards Board s Request for Information on Rate Regulation Question 1: For the types of rate regulation that you think would be
More informationBRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION INQUIRY RESPECTING SITE C
81-2 BRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION INQUIRY RESPECTING SITE C ASSOCIATION OF MAJOR POWER CUSTOMERS OF BC SUBMISSION ON THE PANEL S PRELIMINARY REPORT British Columbia Utilities Commission Association
More informationPacific Northern Gas Ltd. and Pacific Northern Gas (N.E.) Ltd. ( PNG ) 2012 Pension and Non-Pension Benefits Application. Final Submission of
Pacific Northern Gas Ltd. and Pacific Northern Gas (N.E.) Ltd. ( PNG ) 2012 Pension and Non-Pension Benefits Application Final Submission of British Columbia Pensioners and Seniors Organization, Active
More informationIN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15, (Schedule B);
Ontari o Energy Board Commission de l énergie de l Ontario IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15, (Schedule B); AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by Hydro One Remote Communities
More informationM A N I T O B A ) Order No. 29/14 ) THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT ) March 14, 2014
M A N I T O B A ) Order No. 29/14 ) THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT ) Before: Régis Gosselin, B ès Arts, MBA, CGA, Chair Marilyn Kapitany, B.Sc., Hon., M.Sc., Member Larry Soldier, Member APPLICATION FOR
More informationEPCOR Energy Alberta GP Inc.
Decision 20633-D01-2016 EPCOR Energy Alberta GP Inc. 2016-2017 Regulated Rate Tariff Application December 20, 2016 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 20633-D01-2016 EPCOR Energy Alberta GP Inc. 2016-2017
More informationAltaGas Utilities Inc.
Decision 23898-D01-2018 2019 Annual Performance-Based Regulation Rate Adjustment Filing December 20, 2018 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 23898-D01-2018 2019 Annual Performance-Based Regulation Rate
More informationDecision D FortisAlberta Inc PBR Capital Tracker True-Up and PBR Capital Tracker Forecast
Decision 20497-D01-2016 FortisAlberta Inc. 2014 PBR Capital Tracker True-Up and 2016-2017 PBR Capital Tracker Forecast February 20, 2016 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 20497-D01-2016 FortisAlberta
More informationPlease find attached BC Hydro's supplemental responses to BCUC IR and BCUC IR
B16-12 Joanna Sofield Chief Regulatory Officer Phone: (604) 623-4046 Fax: (604) 623-4407 regulatory.group@bchydro.com September 29, 2006 Mr. Robert J. Pellatt Commission Secretary British Columbia Utilities
More information2017 Earnings Webcast February 13, 2018
2017 Earnings Webcast February 13, 2018 Presenting Today Bob Rowe, President & CEO Brian Bird, Vice President & CFO Forward Looking Statements During the course of this presentation, there will be forward-looking
More informationEPCOR Energy Services (Alberta) Ltd.
Alberta Energy and Utilities Board Decision 2002-112 EPCOR Energy Services (Alberta) Ltd. 2003 Regulated Rate Option Settlement Agreement December 20, 2002 ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD Decision 2002-112:
More informationAlberta Electric System Operator
Decision 2007-106 Alberta Electric System Operator 2007 General Tariff Application December 21, 2007 ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD Decision 2007-106: Alberta Electric System Operator 2007 General
More informationMARITIME LINK PROJECT
Maritime Link Appendix 4.02 Page 1 of 48 MARITIME LINK PROJECT OPINION ON CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND RETURN ON EQUITY Prepared by KATHLEEN C. MCSHANE FOSTER ASSOCIATES, INC. January 2013 Maritime Link Appendix
More informationDecision ATCO Gas General Rate Application Phase I Compliance Filing to Decision Part B.
Decision 2006-083 2005-2007 General Rate Application Phase I Compliance Filing to Decision 2006-004 August 11, 2006 ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD Decision 2006-083: 2005-2007 General Rate Application
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: Howard v. Benson Group Inc. (The Benson Group Inc.), 2016 ONCA 256 DATE: 20160408 DOCKET: C60404 BETWEEN Cronk, Pepall and Miller JJ.A. John Howard Plaintiff (Appellant)
More informationENMAX Power Corporation
Decision 22238-D01-2017 ENMAX Power Corporation 2016-2017 Transmission General Tariff Application December 4, 2017 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 22238-D01-2017 ENMAX Power Corporation 2016-2017
More informationDECISION. and. (Matter No. 371) June 6, 2018 NEW BRUNSWICK ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD
DECISION IN THE MATTER OF an Application by Enbridge Gas New Brunswick Limited Partnership, as represented by its general partner, Enbridge Gas New Brunswick Inc., for approval to change its Small General
More informationCHARITY & NFP LAW BULLETIN NO. 384
CHARITY & NFP LAW BULLETIN NO. 384 APRIL 28, 2016 EDITOR: TERRANCE S. CARTER COURT OF APPEAL: EMPLOYEE INJURY WAIVER DECLARED VOID By Barry Kwasniewski * A. INTRODUCTION On January 26, 2016, the Ontario
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q R QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY
More informationAltaGas Utilities Inc.
Decision 2013-465 2014 Annual PBR Rate Adjustment Filing December 23, 2013 The Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 2013-465: 2014 Annual PBR Rate Adjustment Filing Application No. 1609923 Proceeding
More informationFinancial Statements. AltaLink, L.P. Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
Financial Statements FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT To the Partners of We have audited the accompanying financial statements of, which comprise the balance sheets as at December 31,
More informationDARLINGTON REFURBISHMENT CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS IN RATE BASE
Filed: 00-0- EB-00-000 Exhibit D Tab Schedule Page of 0 0 0 0 DARLINGTON REFURBISHMENT CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS IN RATE BASE.0 PURPOSE This evidence provides a description of the proposed regulatory
More informationMEG Energy Corporation
Decision 2006-057 Construct and Operate a 25-kV Electrical Distribution System June 15, 2006 ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD Decision 2006-057: Construct and Operate a 25-kV Electrical Distribution
More informationWHERE DID CONSERVATISM GO?
WHERE DID CONSERVATISM GO? Sheldon R. Smith, Woodbury School of Business, Utah Valley University, 800 W. University Parkway, Orem, UT 84058, 801-863-6153, smithsh@uvu.edu Kevin R. Smith, Woodbury School
More informationJonathan A. Lesser of Bates White, LLC Speaker 2: 1
Jonathan A. Lesser of Bates White, LLC Speaker 2: 1 Financial Risks Faced by Regulated Utilities: Implications for the Cost of Capital and Ratemaking Policies Law Seminars International Current Utility
More informationCANADIAN UTILITIES LIMITED FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CANADIAN UTILITIES LIMITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 CANADIAN UTILITIES LIMITED 2014 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS February 19, 2015 Independent Auditor
More informationDecision CU Water Limited. Disposition of Assets. April 30, 2010
Decision 2010-192 Disposition of Assets April 30, 2010 ALBERTA UTILITIES COMMISSION Decision 2010-192: Disposition of Assets Application No. 1606042 Proceeding ID. 569 April 30, 2010 Published by Alberta
More informationAccounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors. Jalis Ahmad & Co. Chartered Accountants
International Accounting Standard (IAS-8) Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors Objective Of IAS 8 O O O O O O it prescribes the criteria for: selection of accounting policies;
More informationIN THE MATTER OF TERASEN GAS INC. AND TERASEN GAS (VANCOUVER ISLAND) INC
IN THE MATTER OF TERASEN GAS INC. AND TERASEN GAS (VANCOUVER ISLAND) INC. APPLICATION TO DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE RETURN ON EQUITY AND CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND TO REVIEW AND REVISE THE AUTOMATIC ADJUSTMENT
More informationIN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act 1998, S.O.1998, c.15, (Schedule B);
Ontario Energy Board Commission de l Énergie de l Ontario RP-2003-0249 IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act 1998, S.O.1998, c.15, (Schedule B); AND IN THE MATTER OF an Application pursuant to
More informationDecision The ATCO Utilities. Corporate Costs. March 21, 2013
Decision 2013-111 Corporate Costs March 21, 2013 The Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 2013-111: Corporate Costs Application No. 1608510 Proceeding ID No. 1920 March 21, 2013 Published by The Alberta
More informationSUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 437
SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. A bill to amend PA, entitled "An act to provide for the regulation and control of public and certain private utilities and other services affected with a public interest
More information3.04. Electricity Sector Stranded Debt. Chapter 3 Section. Background. Detailed Review Observations HOW DID THE STRANDED DEBT ARISE?
Chapter 3 Section 3.04 Ministry of Finance Electricity Sector Stranded Debt Background We provided updates in past Annual Reports on the electricity sector s stranded debt, defined as that portion of the
More informationThe following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA Five Years Ended July 26, 2003 (In millions, except per-share amounts) The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements
More informationBRMA: A Contract Certain Product: Principles [and Practice] for the. US Broker Reinsurance Market
BRMA: A Contract Certain Product: Principles [and Practice] for the 1. Background US Broker Reinsurance Market Reinsurance has evolved considerably since the days when contracts were sealed by a handshake
More informationENERSOURCE HYDRO MISSISSAUGA INC. HORIZON UTILITIES CORPORATION & POWERSTREAM INC.
Commission de l énergie de l Ontario DECISION AND ORDER ENERSOURCE HYDRO MISSISSAUGA INC. HORIZON UTILITIES CORPORATION & POWERSTREAM INC. Application for approval to amalgamate to form LDC Co and for
More informationORDER PO Appeal PA Peterborough Regional Health Centre. June 30, 2016
ORDER PO-3627 Appeal PA15-399 Peterborough Regional Health Centre June 30, 2016 Summary: The appellant, a journalist, sought records relating to the termination of the employment of several employees of
More informationSIMPLIFIED PROSPECTUS DATED SEPTEMBER 26, (Offering Class A, Class B1, Class B2, Class B3, Class C1, Class C2, Class C3 and Class F Units)
BMG FUNDS SIMPLIFIED PROSPECTUS DATED SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 BMG BullionFund (Offering Class A, Class B1, Class B2, Class B3, Class C1, Class C2, Class C3 and Class F Units) BMG Gold BullionFund (Offering
More informationFORTISALBERTA INC. MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FORTISALBERTA INC. MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS April 30, 2018 The following ( MD&A ) of FortisAlberta Inc. (the Corporation ) should be read in conjunction with the following: (i) the unaudited
More informationDECISION AND ORDER ON PHASE 1
Commission de l énergie de l Ontario DECISION AND ORDER ON PHASE 1 HYDRO ONE NETWORKS INC. Leave to construct a new transmission line and facilities in the Windsor-Essex Region, Ontario. Before: Ken Quesnelle
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
BETWEEN COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: Hampton Securities Limited v. Dean, 2018 ONCA 901 DATE: 20181109 DOCKET: C64908 Lauwers, Hourigan and Pardu JJ.A. Hampton Securities Limited and Christina
More informationNaturEner Energy Canada Inc.
Decision 2009-174 Review and Variance of Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 2009-042 (October 22, 2009) ALBERTA UTILITIES COMMISSION Decision 2009-174, Review and Variance of Alberta Utilities Commission
More informationTransCanada PipeLines Limited Response to Union Gas Limited Interrogatory #1
TCPL.Union.1 Union Gas Limited Interrogatory #1 Reference: TransCanada Supplemental Evidence Page 1, Lines 30-31 and Page 2, Lines 21-25 a) Please confirm that Union was not a party to any of the discussions
More informationM A N I T O B A Order No. 44/11 THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT THE MANITOBA PUBLIC INSURANCE ACT
M A N I T O B A Order No. 44/11 THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT THE MANITOBA PUBLIC INSURANCE ACT THE CROWN CORPORATIONS PUBLIC REVIEW AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT March 31, 2011 Before: Graham Lane, CA, Chairman
More informationTHE DEFERRAL ACCOUNT BALANCES APPLICATIONS
Before the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board in THE DEFERRAL ACCOUNT BALANCES APPLICATIONS Deferral Accounts Carrying Cost Evidence of William J. Demcoe Willbren & Co. Ltd. John D. McCormick J. D. McCormick
More informationIndexed As: Gimbel et al. v. Alberta (Minister of Public Works, Supply and Services)
Howard Vance Gimbel, Judith Anne Gimbel and Carl Management Ltd. (appellants/claimants) v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta, as Represented by the Minister of Public Works, Supply & Services (Now
More informationENTERED 04/24/08 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UW 123 ) ) ) ) ) DISPOSITION: NEW TARIFFS ADOPTED
ORDER NO. 08-235 ENTERED 04/24/08 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UW 123 In the Matter of FISH MILL LODGES WATER SYSTEM Request for a general rate increase. ) ) ) ) ) ORDER DISPOSITION:
More informationEVALUATING INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS: AN ECONOMIC REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
EVALUATING INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS: AN ECONOMIC REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable (GUIRR) Infrastructure: The Cost of Doing Nothing June 25, 2013, The National
More informationPrepared Direct Testimony of James M. Coyne. On Behalf of Gaz Métro. December 14, 2012
Société en commandite Gaz Métro Cause tarifaire 0, R-0-0 Prepared Direct Testimony of James M. Coyne On Behalf of Gaz Métro December, 0 Original : 0.. Gaz Métro -, Document ( pages) TABLE OF CONTENTS I.
More informationour purpose: 2016 Annual Report Financial Review Live Life Well
our purpose: 2016 Annual Report Financial Review Live Life Well 2016 Annual Report Financial Review Financial Highlights Management s Discussion and Analysis Financial Results Notes to the Consolidated
More informationInformation Statement Date: December 12, 2016
CIBC Canadian Blue Chip Growth Deposit Notes, Series 28 Information Statement Principal Protected Notes Information Statement Date: December 12, 2016 Issue Date: January 20, 2017 Maturity Date: January
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 09-4001 KARL SCHMIDT UNISIA, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE,
More informationRAPPORT D'EXPERT SUR LE COÛT DE LA DETTE KATHLEEN MCSHANE
A Demande R-1-00 RAPPORT D'EXPERT SUR LE COÛT DE LA DETTE KATHLEEN MCSHANE Original: 00-0-0 HQD-, Document Page 1 de 1 TESTIMONY OF KATHLEEN C. McSHANE ON EMBEDDED COST OF DEBT ON BEHALF OF HYDRO-QUÉBEC
More informationALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD Calgary Alberta
ALBERTA ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD Calgary Alberta NOVA GAS TRANSMISSION LTD. APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A METER STATION AND TO TRANSFER LICENCES Decision 97-14 BONNIE GLEN / ESEP SYSTEM Application
More informationTraditional Economic Regulation of Electric Utilities
DECEMBER 17, 2018 Traditional Economic Regulation of Electric Utilities U.S. EPA Jessica Shipley Associate jshipley@raponline.org Introductions The Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP) is a global NGO providing
More informationTHE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT July 27, Graham Lane, CA, Chairman Len Evans, LL.D., Member Eric Jorgensen, Member
MANITOBA Order No. 99/07 THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT July 27, 2007 Before: Graham Lane, CA, Chairman Len Evans, LL.D., Member Eric Jorgensen, Member CENTRA GAS MANITOBA INC. 2007/08 AND 2008/09 GENERAL
More informationSASKENERGY INCORPORATED
SASKENERGY INCORPORATED THIRD QUARTER REPORT, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION, MISSION AND VALUES As a Crown corporation, SaskEnergy is committed to ensuring that all corporate activities align with the
More informationEmbedding Financial Viability and Sustainability
Embedding Financial Viability and Sustainability September 2011 The purpose of this paper is to review the RIC s approach utilized for the first price control period to assessing financeability and to
More informationCase Name: Paquette v. TeraGo Networks Inc. Between Trevor Paquette, Plaintiff (Appellant), and TeraGo Networks Inc., Defendant (Respondent)
Page 1 Case Name: Paquette v. TeraGo Networks Inc. Between Trevor Paquette, Plaintiff (Appellant), and TeraGo Networks Inc., Defendant (Respondent) [2016] O.J. No. 4222 2016 ONCA 618 269 A.C.W.S. (3d)
More informationPRUDENCE IMPLICATIONS OF NUCLEAR PLANT DECOMMISSIONING
PRUDENCE IMPLICATIONS OF NUCLEAR PLANT DECOMMISSIONING ABSTRACT John C. Person Person & Craver LLP 1133 Connecticut Ave., Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20036 Phone: (202) 466-4434 e-mail: JPATTNY@aol.com
More informationInsurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC) 2018 Basic Insurance Rate Design Application Project No ICBC s Reply to TREAD Submission
September 18, 2018 File No.: 298298.00020/14797 Matthew Ghikas Direct +1 604 631 3191 Facsimile +1 604 632 3191 mghikas@fasken.com Electronic Filing British Columbia Utilities Commission Sixth Floor, 900
More information(Offering Class A, Class B1, Class B2, Class B3, Class C1, Class C2, Class C3, Class F, Class S1 and Class S2 Units)
BMG FUNDS SIMPLIFIED PROSPECTUS DATED September 5, 2014 BMG BullionFund (Offering Class A, Class B1, Class B2, Class B3, Class C1, Class C2, Class C3, Class F, Class S1 and Class S2 Units) BMG Gold BullionFund
More informationBenefits of Integrating CWIP into Rate Base in Ontario
FINAL REPORT Filed:2010-05-26 EB-2010-0008 Exhibit D4-1-1 Prepared For: Ontario Power Generation Benefits of Integrating CWIP into Rate Base in Ontario Prepared By: Ralph L. Luciani Vice President 1201
More informationFEVI DEFERRAL ACCOUNT PEC EXHIBIT A2-3
ERICA HAMILTON COMMISSION SECRETARY Commission.Secretary@bcuc.com web site: http://www.bcuc.com VIA EMAIL gas.regulatory.affairs@fortisbc.com April 4, 2013 SIXTH FLOOR, 900 HOWE STREET, BOX 250 VANCOUVER,
More informationBefore the New York State Public Service Commission. Case 08-E-0539-Consolidated Edison-Electric Rates. Reply Brief of Consumer Power Advocates
Before the New York State Public Service Commission Case 08-E-0539-Consolidated Edison-Electric Rates Reply Brief of Consumer Power Advocates December 8, 2008 Consumer Power Advocates (CPA) submits this
More informationBC Hydro F2017-F2019 Revenue Requirement Application (RRA) Association of Major Power Customer of BC (AMPC) Supplemental Final Argument
VIA COMMISSION E-FILING SYSTEM British Columbia Utilities Commission 6th floor, 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2N3 Attention: Mr. Patrick Wruck, Commission Secretary Barristers & Solicitors / Patent
More informationThe Impact of Dudenhoeffer on Lower Court Stock-Drop Cases
The Impact of Dudenhoeffer on Lower Court Stock-Drop Cases ALYSSA OHANIAN The Supreme Court recently held in Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 134 S. Ct. 2459 (2014), that employer stock ownership plan
More informationThe State of Debt Under the Proposed Section 385 Regulations
Robb Chase Andrew Appleby TEI Denver May 11, 2016 The State of Debt Under the Proposed Section 385 Regulations All Rights Reserved. This communication is for general informational purposes only and is
More informationBRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION. IN THE MATTER OF the Utilities Commission Act R.S.B.C. 1996, Chapter 473;
Order Number G--0 BRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF the Utilities Commission Act R.S.B.C., Chapter ; AND IN THE MATTER OF British Columbia BC Hydro and Power Authority 0/0 and 0/0
More informationCase Name: Anadarko Canada Corp. v. Canada (National Energy Board)
Page 1 Case Name: Anadarko Canada Corp. v. Canada (National Energy Board) Between Anadarko Canada Corporation, BP Canada Energy Company, Chevron Canada Limited, Devon Canada Corporation, and Nytis Exploration
More informationAttention: Patrick G. Yearwood (counsel for TMS Transportation Management Services Ltd.)
OFFICE OF THE BRITISH COLUMBIA CONTAINER TRUCKING COMMISSIONER June 29, 2016 Yearwood Dyson - Lawyers 2, 9613-192 Street Surrey BC V4N 4C7 Via email: pyearwood@bclaw.bc.ca Via fax: 604 513 0211 Original
More informationHere s a Bonus: You re Fired!
EMPLOYMENT LAW CONFERENCE 2017 PAPER 7.1 Here s a Bonus: You re Fired! If you enjoyed this Practice Point, you can access all CLEBC course materials by subscribing to the Online Course Materials Library
More informationNEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AN ORDER OF THE BOARD NO. P.U. 17(2018)
NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AN ORDER OF THE BOARD NO. P.U. (0) 0 0 IN THE MATTER OF the Electrical Power Control Act,, SNL, Chapter E-. (the EPCA ) and the Public
More informationSCC File No: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ALBERTA) LEDCOR CONSTRUCTION LIMITED.
B E T W E E N: SCC File No: 36452 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ALBERTA) LEDCOR CONSTRUCTION LIMITED -and- APPLICANT (Respondent) NORTHBRIDGE INDEMNITY INSURANCE
More informationThe "Regulatory Compact" and Implicit Contracts: Should Stranded Costs Be Recoverable? James Boyd. Discussion Paper
The "Regulatory Compact" and Implicit Contracts: Should Stranded Costs Be Recoverable? James Boyd Discussion Paper 97-01 October 1996 Resources for the Future 1616 P Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 Telephone
More informationPatrick Hoey Director, Regulatory Affairs Tel Fax
500 Consum ers Road North York, ON M2J 1P8 PO Box 650 Scarborough ON M1K 5E3 Patrick Hoey Director, Regulatory Affairs Tel 416-495-5555 Fax 416-495-6072 Email patrick.hoey@enbridge.com NB IDG VIA COURIER
More informationFlakeboard Interrogatory No. 1
Interrogatory No. 1 Page 1 of 1 Interrogatory No. 1 Reference: Direct testimony of Mr. Charleson and Mr. LeBlanc filed June 7, 2010, page 4, Q5. Reference is made to single end use franchises ( SEUF s
More informationADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY PENALTIES
ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY PENALTIES CELA S COMMENTS ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY PENALTY PROPOSAL Report #418 ISBN #1-894158-59-8 Prepared by: Ramani Nadarajah Counsel April 2002 CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationPractical guide to IFRS Exposure draft on impairment of financial assets
pwc.com/ifrs Practical guide to IFRS Exposure draft on impairment of financial assets Contents: At a glance Background 2 The proposed IASB model 3 Next steps 12 Appendix Comparison between the IASB s and
More informationSASKENERGY INCORPORATED
SASKENERGY INCORPORATED FIRST QUARTER REPORT June 30, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION, MISSION AND VALUES As a Crown corporation, SaskEnergy is committed to ensuring that all corporate activities align with
More informationOctober 3, 2007 CONSOLIDATION OF COMMERCIAL PAPER CONDUITS. Objective
CONSOLIDATION OF COMMERCIAL PAPER CONDUITS Objective The objective of this paper is to discuss the application of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest
More informationNATURAL GAS RATE SCHEDULES & RIDERS
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DIVISION OF WATER & GAS NATURAL GAS RATE SCHEDULES & RIDERS Rate Making Authority... 2 Definitions... 3 Residential Gas Service... 5 Firm Commercial Gas Service... 6 Commercial Transportation
More informationDECISION ATCO GAS NORTH A DIVISION OF ATCO GAS AND PIPELINES LTD.
DECISION 2001-65 ATCO GAS NORTH A DIVISION OF ATCO GAS AND PIPELINES LTD. SALE OF CERTAIN PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS RIGHTS, PRODUCTION AND GATHERING ASSETS, STORAGE ASSETS : REASONS FOR DECISION 2001-46
More informationLivingstone Landowners Guild
Decision 20846-D01-2016 Livingstone Landowners Guild Application for Review of Decision 2009-126 Needs Identification Document Application Southern Alberta Transmission System Reinforcement as amended
More informationBEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Supplemental Rebuttal Testimony of Joelle R. Steward
Docket No. 0000-0-EA- Witness: Joelle R. Steward BEFORE THE WYOMING PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER Supplemental Rebuttal Testimony of Joelle R. Steward March 0 0 0 Q. Are you the same Joelle
More informationStakes Are High For ERISA Fiduciaries
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Stakes Are High For ERISA Fiduciaries Law360, New
More informationCase Comment: Carrigan v. Carrigan Estate- Changing the Face of Pension Beneficiaries
January 2013 Family Law Section Case Comment: Carrigan v. Carrigan Estate- Changing the Face of Pension Beneficiaries Malerie Rose* On October 31, 2012, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision
More informationWECC Standard BAL-STD Operating Reserves
A. Introduction 1. Title: Operating Reserves 2. Number: BAL-STD-002-0 3. Purpose: Regional Reliability Standard to address the Operating Reserve requirements of the Western Interconnection. 4. Applicability
More informationProfessors Tougas & Wright TOTAL MARKS: 125
4 Exam Code: Return this exam question paper to your invigilator at the end of the exam before you leave the classroom. Attachment: Competition Act THIS EXAMINATION CONSISTS OF 11 PAGES PLEASE ENSURE THAT
More informationVia . June 7 th, 2017
Via email June 7 th, 2017 The Secretary Ontario Securities Commission 20 Queen Street West 19th Floor, Box 55 Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S8 Fax: 416-593-2318 comments@osc.gov.on.ca Anne-Marie Beaudoin, Secrétaire
More information