Covered Agreements, Credit for Reinsurance and Counterparty Credit Risk. History of U.S. reinsurance collateral debate
|
|
- Arlene Sparks
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Covered Agreements, Credit for Reinsurance and Counterparty Credit Risk Learning Objectives History of U.S. reinsurance collateral debate What is a covered agreement? Potential preemption of state laws? EU and Solvency II Why does equivalence matter? Counterparty Credit Risk Differing methodologies.
2 Reinsurance Collateral Historically, state insurance regulators have required foreign reinsurers to hold 100% collateral within the U.S. for the risks they assume from U.S. insurers. As reinsurers are ultimately providing insurance to other insurance companies that are directly protecting American policyholders, requiring consumer protection collateral in the U.S. is intended to ensure claimspaying capital is available and reachable by U.S. firms and regulators should it be needed, particularly in the wake of a natural disaster. Foreign reinsurers regulators and politicians have objected to their companies having to post consumer protection collateral in the U.S. as such capital is unavailable for other purposes, including investment opportunities. Change is Happening Recently, the NAIC passed amendments to its Credit for Reinsurance Models that once implemented by a state, will allow certified reinsurers to post significantly less than 100% consumer protection collateral for U.S. claims. To date, 36 states have passed legislation to implement the revised NAIC Credit for Reinsurance Models, representing more than 66% of direct insurance premium written in the U.S. across all lines of business. An additional five states have indicated plans to take up the model law in the near future, which would raise the total market coverage to 93%.
3 Covered Agreement The notion of a covered agreement was included in Title V of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) as a unique stand-by authority for the Treasury and the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to address, if necessary, those areas where U.S. state insurance laws or regulations treat non-u.s. insurers differently than U.S. insurers. A covered agreement can serve as a basis for preemption of state law under certain circumstances, but only if the agreement relates to measures substantially equivalent to the protections afforded consumers under state law. What is a Covered Agreement? A covered agreement is a bilateral or multilateral agreement among the United States and foreign jurisdiction(s) regarding the recognition of regulatory measures with respect to the business of insurance or reinsurance. A regulatory measure subject to a covered agreement must achieve a level of protection for consumers that is substantially equivalent to the level of protection achieved under state law. A covered agreement can serve as a basis for preemption of state law under certain circumstances.
4 How can one enter into a Covered Agreement? A covered agreement is negotiated jointly by the U.S. Treasury s Federal Insurance Office (FIO) and the USTR with foreign authorities. Before initiating negotiations, during the negotiations, and before entering into a covered agreement, the Treasury Secretary and USTR must jointly consult with the House Financial Services Committee, House Ways and Means Committee, Senate Banking Committee, and Senate Finance Committee. At a minimum, such consultation must cover: 1) the nature of the agreement, 2) how and to what extent such agreement will achieve the purposes of Title V of the Dodd-Frank Act, and 3) the implementation of the agreement and its effect on state laws. How can state law be preempted? A state insurance measure can only be preempted if the FIO Director determines that: 1. The measure results in less favorable treatment of a non-u.s. insurer domiciled in a foreign jurisdiction that is subject to a covered agreement, than a U.S. insurer domiciled, licensed, or admitted to do business in that state. 2. The measure is inconsistent with a covered agreement.
5 How can state law be preempted? The scope of the review for such determination is limited to: 1. The subject matter contained within the covered agreement involved. 2. Whether the subject matter of the agreement achieves a level of protection for insurance consumers that is substantially equivalent to the level of protection achieved under state law. Before a state law can be preempted, the FIO Director is required to: 1. Notify and consult with the appropriate state regarding any potential preemption. 2. Notify and consult with the USTR regarding any preemption. 3. Publish in the federal register for public comment a notice of the potential preemption including a description of each state insurance measure at issue and any applicable covered agreement. How can state law be preempted? Upon making a determination of a preemption, the FIO Director is required to: 1. Notify the appropriate state of the determination, 2. Establish a reasonable period of time for the preemption to become effective, and 3. Notify the relevant Congressional committees of such preemption. Once the preemption has become effective, the FIO Director is required to: 1. Publish another notice in the Federal Register. 2. Notify the appropriate state.
6 How can state law be preempted? A state has a right to appeal this determination in court pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act and such appeal shall be considered under a de novo standard of review (i.e. without judicial deference to the FIO Director s determination). Not all insurance regulatory measures can be preempted. The following state laws and regulations cannot be preempted: 1. Those governing rates, premiums, underwriting, or sales practices; 2. State insurance coverage requirements; 3. State antitrust laws relating to the business of insurance; and 4. Those relating to capital and solvency except to the extent that such measure results in less favorable treatment for non-u.s. insurers than U.S. insurers. What about the EU and Solvency II? The Solvency II Directive provides for the EU to make an equivalence determination for non-eu countries in the areas of group supervision, group solvency, and reinsurance. The Directive also requires that an appropriate confidentiality regime be in place. Non-EU based companies from countries that have been deemed equivalent may be subject to less stringent regulatory standards to operate in the European Union than those jurisdictions that have not been deemed equivalent. Importantly, EU companies do significantly more business in the U.S. than U.S. companies do in the EU and many, if not all, EU subsidiaries of U.S. companies are already structured in a way to meet the new European requirements even in the absence of equivalence.
7 What about the EU and Solvency II? While the U.S. and EU systems are different, they strive for similar outcomes of protecting policyholders and ensuring a competitive and fair marketplace for consumers. The ongoing US/EU Dialogue process has been instrumental in enhancing our mutual understanding of our respective regulatory systems including the areas of group supervision and reinsurance collateral among other matters. While a Covered Agreement may be one mechanism for achieving recognition of the United States under Solvency II, it is clear that it can also be achieved through other mechanisms such as recognition of existing structures and processes. In fact, the European Commission issued a decision deeming the U.S. system of group solvency and confidentiality provisionally equivalent without the need for a covered agreement. What about the EU and Solvency II? According to the NAIC, the federal government has not demonstrated benefits to U.S. insurers or consumers that would warrant a covered agreement preempting state law. There are alternatives to such drastic action, including state action already underway. However, if Treasury and USTR move forward, state insurance regulators expect to be a direct part of the negotiations to ensure that mutual recognition is not paid for with unnecessary preemption of state law.
8 What about the EU and Solvency II? To the extent Treasury and the USTR maintain that a covered agreement is in the best interests of the United States, we have a number of questions, including: 1. What is the scope of the agreement? How narrow is it? Is it limited to reinsurance consumer protection collateral or does it extend to other topics? 2. What is the cost-benefit for the United States? Requiring all states to eliminate collateral requirements for foreign reinsurers would clearly help non-u.s. companies, but is there a corresponding benefit to U.S. policyholders and companies? What about the EU and Solvency II? (cont d.) 3. How will the agreement be substantially equivalent to the protections afforded U.S. consumers under state insurance laws? Reinsurance collateral protects insurance consumers by ensuring that reinsurers pay on their claims to ceding insurers, who in turn, rely on such coverage to pay consumer claims. Reducing collateral beyond a prudent risk-based regulatory assessment, as the NAIC approach provides, may increase the likelihood that reinsurance claims may not be paid, in full or on time, thereby potentially increasing risks to U.S insurers and policyholders.
9 SCR and RBC Similarities and Differences Frankenstein Approach Capital requirements in the U.S. have been risk-based for nearly 20 years, with the initial life insurance risk-based capital ( RBC ) formula implemented in Numerous improvements have been implemented in the RBC formulas over time and currently are targeted for various types of insurers. Solvency II is finally in place effective January 1, 2016 after 10+ years of deliberations, impact studies and billions spent by the insurance industry. RBC: Reinsurance Implications RBC will continue to be a component in the legal framework of U.S. solvency regulation in order to maintain a floor for triggering regulatory intervention. The NAIC and U.S. insurance regulators knowingly excluded some risks in the RBC calculation over the years as well as creating certain risk factors utilizing purely subjective criteria.
10 Capital is only one piece of the puzzle Is Solvency II Revolutionary?
11 Reinsurance Implications RBC - Transparency The RBC factors as well as the formula for calculating RBC in the U.S. are publicly available and are thus transparent to all interested stakeholders in a (re)insurer. The advantage of this is that it has been more difficult for insurers to delay regulatory action by challenging regulatory authority in court. The disadvantage of this transparency is that it also provides moral hazard in that troubled (re)insurers may be able to manipulate the RBC ratio in order to avoid certain triggering events. This has sometimes resulted in the (re)insurer being in a financially hazardous condition at a later date where damage to stakeholders might have been minimized if corrective action plans were required earlier.
12 Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk Reinsurance recoverables are amounts due from the company s reinsurers. Amounts due from reinsurance companies are categorized according to whether they are overdue and, if so, by how many days. Those recoverables deemed uncollectible are reported as a surplus penalty on the liability side of the balance sheet, thus reducing surplus. The current U.S. property-casualty credit component of the formula applies a 10 percent charge to reinsurance recoverables from non-affiliates and affiliated alien insurers (minus the penalty for unauthorized or overdue reinsurance), a 1 percent charge to interest, dividend, and real estate income due and accrued, and a 5 percent charge to other miscellaneous receivables. Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk A significant degree of judgment was utilized in designing the current NAIC P/C RBC formula, choosing parameters used to calculate capital charges for individual risks, and specifying risk dependency. Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations ( NRSROs or Rating Agencies ) have also been attempting to better quantify reinsurance counterparty credit risk. Rating agency credit charges have typically been lower than the NAIC threshold for highly-rated reinsurers (i.e. those with ratings in the A range and above).
13 Shortfalls in the Current Treatment The factor is based on judgments applied to a number of interrelated issues and is not based on statistical analysis. The current factor is not calibrated to a particular risk level. The factor does not reflect variation in credit risk by reinsurer. The R3 reinsurance credit risk factor does not consider the potential reinsurance credit risk for future significant events like catastrophes. Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk Regulators have indicated that there is some justification for these discrepancies as the regulatory 10 percent charge is intended to reflect four elements: pure reinsurer credit risk, the extent to which the ceded reinsurance liability may be underestimated, the extent to which risk transfer to the reinsurer may be limited, and the possibility of disputes regarding coverage.
14 Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk Since the NAIC s RBC framework was introduced, a number of new controls on reinsurance risk have been implemented, each of which has a potential impact on the size of the reinsurance credit risk. 1. In the Statement of Actuarial Opinion, the opining actuary now attests to both the gross and net reserves of the company. 2. Consistent with the increasing emphasis on corporate governance, companies are expected to have greater internal controls over their operations, including the nature and use of reinsurance. 3.More testing and documentation is required in the realm of risk transfer. As such, there is more formal assurance that reinsurance arrangements include a sufficient degree of risk transfer, and there is more actuarial modeling of the effects of reinsurance transactions Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk Reinsurance Recovery Risk - The reinsurance recovery risk is the risk that the ceding insurer will be unable to collect the full amount of reinsurance recoverables. This risk arises primarily from three scenarios: (1) Counterparty default risk the ceding company s inability to collect the full amount of reinsurance recoverables anticipated under the contract terms due to reinsurer default(s). (2) Commutation risk the ceding insurer mitigating its credit risk by accepting a reinsurance commutation for an amount less than that anticipated to be recoverable under the contract due to deterioration in the financial condition (but not actual default) of the reinsurer. (3) Coverage dispute risk a reinsurer is able to pay the full amount expected by the ceding insurer, but the reinsurer successfully disputes the applicability of reinsurance coverage and/or the actual amount to be paid.
15 Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk Relative risk of company impairment increased as the group percentage of ceded premium increased from 25 percent to 50 percent and thereafter a. The 2,620 companies of total 3,269 in the data set had a ceded reinsurance percentage of 25 percent or less. b. The 630 companies with group ceded reinsurance of 25 percent to 50 percent had twice the probability of impairment risk of companies with 0 percent to 25 percent group ceded reinsurance. c. The 338 companies with group ceded reinsurance of over 50 percent had nearly three times the probability of impairment risk of companies with 0 percent to 25 percent group ceded reinsurance. Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk NRSRO ratings tend to be credit-only quality opinions and may not comment on other factors such as the adequacy of market price or market liquidity. Rating opinions are relative rankings and not based on any specific probability of default. Rating opinions tend to have a longer forecast horizon attempting to look through any temporary cyclicality. Typically, implied ratings are only available for publicly-traded firms and would not necessarily be available for mutual organizations or smaller entities.
16 Counterparty Credit Risk One methodology Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk At the time of development, there was significant concern about the quality of reinsurance. The uniform 10 percent factor, regardless of whether the reinsurer was large or small, U.S. or non-u.s., or subject to collateral or not, resulted in part from an effort to avoid creating unnecessary bias for or against the purchase of reinsurance generally or purchases from different types of insurers. U.S. insurance regulators are not alone in attempting to address these risk factors. The European Union s Solvency II initiative, Swiss Solvency Test and the Bermuda Monetary Authority have all experienced difficulties in addressing this risk factor. Both standard formulas and internal models appear to utilize significant judgment in arriving at a calculation as well as how potential defaults are dependent upon one another.
17 Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk At the time of development, there was significant concern about the quality of reinsurance. The uniform 10 percent factor, regardless of whether the reinsurer was large or small, U.S. or non-u.s., or subject to collateral or not, resulted in part from an effort to avoid creating unnecessary bias for or against the purchase of reinsurance generally or purchases from different types of insurers. U.S. insurance regulators are not alone in attempting to address these risk factors. The European Union s Solvency II initiative, Swiss Solvency Test and the Bermuda Monetary Authority have all experienced difficulties in addressing this risk factor. Both standard formulas and internal models appear to utilize significant judgment in arriving at a calculation as well as how potential defaults are dependent upon one another. Musings on Models Objective: Make a model of the Airbus 380 airplane.
18 Musings on Models Models built for which purpose? Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk The U.S. RBC factor does not take into account the amount of risk being transferred from the cedent to the reinsurer, nor does it differentiate between proportional and non-proportional reinsurance protection, long-tail versus short-tail risks or treaty versus facultative protection. One possibility for addressing catastrophe risk would be to have the (re)insurers calculate a separate contingent credit risk charge for the 1- in-100 years expected hurricane loss and 1-in-250 years expected earthquake loss. The charge could be a factor of the difference between the losses gross and net of reinsurance. The RBC factor could then apply factors based upon the financial strength ratings of the reinsurers.
19 Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk In the Life RBC ratio computation instructions, the risk associated with the recoverability of money from reinsurers is comparable to highlyrated NAIC bond classes 1 and 2 and is consequently assigned a 0.8% pre-tax factor. A 0.8% credit is given to avoid overstatement of RBC for reinsurance with non-authorized companies, affiliated companies, funds withheld, collateral other than funds withheld supporting non-affiliate reinsurance and for reinsurance involving policy loans. U.S. insurance regulators are also discussing the role of reinsurance collateral held in trusts and the utilization of special captive insurance vehicles relating to reinsurance collateral requirements. The NAIC and U.S. insurance regulators are also addressing whether this factor is too high or needs to be revised under the SMI process. Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk Solvency II Solvency II, has now established new capital requirements for European companies and their American subsidiaries. Under Solvency II, a market value balance sheet is created, with assets held at market value and liabilities held at fair value. The fair value of liabilities is calculated using a stochastic approach with both the projection and discount rate equal to the swap curve plus an illiquidity premium. The liabilities are based on best estimate assumptions and reflect cashflows for the lifetime of the liability. The liability best estimate assumption includes a risk margin for the current cost of funding. Liabilities are typically discounted at a lower rate than in the U.S. statutory system.
20 Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk Solvency II The Solvency Capital Requirement ( SCR ) is the level of capital needed to withstand the wide variety of risks that an insurer faces with a 99.5% certainty over a one-year period (i.e., 99.5% Value at Risk ( VaR ) confidence level). If the SCR level is breached, increased regulatory scrutiny results, but the shortfall will not force a company to cease operations. This scrutiny is comparable to the RBC s Company Action Level or 200%. The SCR applies to an insurance group as a whole (which differs from RBC), so some members of the group with higher capital can offset members with lower capital, if the entire group is above the SCR. The Minimum Capital Requirement ( MCR ) is calibrated to an 85% VaR over a one-year period. The MCR defines the minimum solvency level for each legal entity within a group. Breach of the MCR would result in the company cessation of operations. Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk Solvency II U.S. insurance regulators should encourage (re)insurers to establish and maintain global credit exposure monitoring platforms to be used in conjunction with their underwriting and other risk monitoring and management. Systems should enable immediate grasp of the current organization-wide risk exposure against a specific counterparty which would tie directly into a (re)insurer s RBC calculation in times of stress. Data management is critical in managing credit, insurance and investment risks as it allows the measurement of the aggregation and correlation of risks. Data systems should also allow stress-testing by allowing parameters and counterparty credit positions to vary, and by incorporating contractual relationships (capital and credit ratingtriggered provisions, etc.). Stress tests should include systemic crises such as major catastrophe losses, asset market turmoil and the evaporation of retrocession capacity.
21 VaR vs. TVaR - Problems with Methodology The portfolio represented by the distribution in blue has the highest average expected loss, but is actually the least risky, with its short tail, while the portfolio represented by the distribution in yellow has the lowest average expected loss, but is the riskiest because it has potential for much higher losses in its long tail. While tail value at risk (TVaR) shares many of the same limitations as VaR and may also contribute to volatility when relied upon as the sole measure of risk, it can be a better measure of underwriting risk. In this example, the VaR at 99.5 percent probability is USD10 million for all three distributions. However, the TVaR at the same level of probability is USD10.7 million for the blue distribution, USD11.4 million for the green and USD13.4 million for the yellow. VaR vs. TVaR - Methodology This illustration vividly shows that the simplistic use of VaR to manage risk may result in increased concentrations and gross underestimation of exposure to tail events. It can also give a false sense of security that can contribute to the overcorrection in risk appetite following unanticipated events.
22 Reinsurance - Counterparty Credit Risk Solvency II Risk models based on past data can lead regulators to underestimate the probability of extreme outcomes, and we cannot assume that (re)insurers have adequately managed reinsurance counterparty credit risk simply by arriving at a quantitative representation. Company management and U.S. insurance regulators also need strong qualitative skills. As part of a (re)insurer s risk management framework, no counterparty should be accepted without a comprehensive review of its financials, resources and people. Rating Opinions? Ratings provided by NRSROs»Rating Opinions: Rating opinions issued by Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations tend to be credit-only quality opinions and may not comment on other factors such as the adequacy of market price or market liquidity. Rating opinions are relative rankings and not based on any specific probability of default. Rating opinions tend to have a longer forecast horizon attempting to look through any temporary cyclicality.
23 Rating Opinions? Ratings provided by NRSROs» Implied ratings based on Credit Default Swaps/Bond Spreads: These market-implied ratings are generally software-based algorithms using credit and equity market valuations. Implied ratings enable relative value analyses both within and across different market instruments globally. Typically, implied ratings are only available for publicly-traded firms and would not necessarily be available for mutual organizations. Implied ratings can be quite volatile experiencing shocks unrelated to the issue. Rating Opinions? Ratings provided by NRSROs Default Studies: Each rating agency does a "look-back" of credit performance. These studies tend to show that higher rated securities (i.e., AAA, AA, etc) tend to have lower defaults than lower rated securities. In essence, the default studies attempt to validate the relative ranking of the Rating Opinions. While many have equated the results of these studies to be "calibration", these empirical studies may be affected by» 1) low frequency events where a smooth default transition may not be evident between two rating categories or maturities,» 2) how asset sectors are grouped such as public finance, corporates, structured finance, and» 3) the length of the exposure period. For example, a default study would yield significant differences if the period were versus
24 Solvency II Proposed Reinsurance Treatment The probability of default in this case for simplicity by rating group must also be established for the calculation of the capital requirement. The grouping of a number of reinsurers in a group is basically conservative, in particular as diversification effects within a group are disregarded. Solvency II Proposed Reinsurance Treatment If two reinsurer groups are compiled, EIOPA suggests using the following risk factors to determine the capital requirement for the counterparty default risk: LGD= max[50% (RI recoverable + SCR gross SCR net Collateral
25 Solvency II Proposed Reinsurance Treatment The capital requirement for the counterparty default risk is then aggregated across all rating groups taking diversification into account. EU Reinsurance Treatment Apart from financial strength, the number of reinsurance partners is an important factor in the measurement of the capital requirement. Risk management can help make a company less vulnerable to losses resulting from reinsurer default by diversifying its risk on reinsurers. However, it cannot be assumed that concentrating reinsurance on a single Reinsurer with a good rating will result in a higher risk than spreading it across a number of reinsurers with worse ratings.
26 EU Reinsurance Treatment Even if companies do not group reinsurers together and the diversification effect resulting from the use of reinsurers is taken into account, the counterparty default risk on financially less robust companies is fundamentally higher and not necessarily fully compensated by the risk relief provided by diversification. Thus, spreading the risk across several reinsurers is not always beneficial, especially if the reinsurers concerned have a variety of ratings. EU Reinsurance Treatment As the chart on the next slide illustrates, the percentage of the LGD that must be held in risk capital almost doubles with each drop in rating class. For example, diversifying risk by changing from a single AA-rated business partner to six separate A- rated counterparties would increase the capital requirement by almost 2%. From a quantitative perspective, concentrating the risk on a financially strong company therefore appears to produce a better result.
27 EU Reinsurance Treatment Solvency II Proposed Reinsurance Treatment Thus, for a program covered by one A-rated reinsurer, the default probability for reinsurance credit risk evaluation is 6.7%, even though the longterm average default probability is.05%. For ten A-rated counterparties, each with an expected default rate of 0.05%, the required capital would be 4.5% of LGD, rather than 6.7% of LGD, reflecting credit for diversification but recognizing that there is a systemic component to the risk.
28 Rating Agency Historical Approaches The A.M. Best BCAR model includes a surcharge for insurers that are considered to be excessively dependent on unaffiliated reinsurance, given their lines of business and financial resources. This additional charge reflects the increased exposure to reinsurance disputes and cash-flow problems the insurer might face as a result of the higher dependence on reinsurance. A.M. Best uses two dependence tests to recognize this risk. The first test compares the company s recoverable-to-surplus ratio to an industry benchmark. The second test examines the company s total ceded leverage to thresholds of five, seven and 10 times surplus, resulting in charges of 15%, 20% and 25% of nonaffiliated recoverables. Rating Agency Historical Approaches S&P uses their own ratings on domestic and international reinsurance companies to assess credit risk on reinsurance recoverables. The reinsurance recoverable charge is applied to the recoverables from reinsurers that fall into the specific rating category to derive a total charge. Reinsurers under some form of regulatory control are deemed to be similar to a 'CCC reinsurer; reinsurers that are not rated are deemed to be similar to 'B' reinsurers.
29 Historical Rating Agency Issues Credit risk - reinsurance recoverables AAA AA A BBB Reinsurers rated 'AAA' 1.167% 1.096% 0.992% 0.820% Reinsurers rated 'AA' 1.600% 1.509% 1.378% 1.159% Reinsurers rated 'A' 2.159% 2.065% 1.927% 1.699% Reinsurers rated 'BBB' 5.958% 5.742% 5.430% 4.908% Reinsurers rated 'BB' % % % % Reinsurers rated 'B' % % % % Reinsurers rated 'CCC' % % % % Reinsurers rated 'R' % % % % Unrated reinsurers % % % % Historical Rating Agency Issues AAA AA A BBB Nonproportional reinsurance (treaty and facultative) Homeowners' multi-peril 43% 38% 35% 27% Farm owners' multi-peril 43% 38% 35% 27% Private passenger auto liability 18% 16% 15% 11% Fire 18% 16% 15% 11% Allied lines 18% 16% 15% 11% Mortgage guaranty 67% 60% 55% 41% Inland marine 18% 16% 15% 11% Financial guaranty 67% 60% 55% 41% Earthquake 18% 16% 15% 11% Group accident and health 67% 60% 55% 41% Credit accident and health 67% 60% 55% 41% Burglary and theft 18% 16% 15% 11% Credit 67% 60% 55% 41% Auto physical damage 22% 19% 18% 13% Fidelity 18% 16% 15% 11% Surety 18% 16% 15% 11% Warranty 67% 60% 55% 41% International 56% 50% 45% 34% Commercial auto liability 38% 34% 31% 24% Medical malpractice occurrence 109% 97% 89% 67% Medical malpractice claims made 80% 71% 65% 49% Special liability 31% 27% 25% 19% Aircraft 31% 27% 25% 19% Boiler and machinery 31% 27% 25% 19% Other liability occurrence 62% 55% 50% 38% Other liability claims made 47% 42% 38% 29% Products liability occurrence 66% 59% 54% 41% Products liability claims made 51% 45% 41% 31% Commerical multiple peril 27% 24% 22% 16% Workers' compensation 37% 32% 30% 22%
30 Rating Agency Historical Approaches Moody s defines credit risk solely as Reinsurance Exposure. As they do with most of the asset risk category, Moody s uses a stochastic approach to determining credit risk. To do so, their model simulates reinsurance risk from four categories: 1) Paid Loss Recoverables and Ceded Reserves; 2) Ceded Reserve Development; 3) Ceded Underwriting; and 4) Ceded Catastrophes. Historical Rating Agency Issues
31 Rating Agency Historical Approaches Each recoverable is identified with the Moody s Insurance Financial Strength Rating (IFSR) of the responsible reinsurer. All Lloyd s syndicates are assigned to the Baa category while involuntary reinsurance facilities are assigned to the Aa rating category. The simulation approach assumes a normal distribution. The model provides an offset collateral equal to 95% or 100% of the Schedule F Part 5 detail for a letter of credit or funds withheld, respectively. Additionally, Moody s Reinsurance Exposure considers contingent liabilities associated with reinsurance recoverables. These consist of contingent exposure to ceded reserve development (adverse net reserve development implies a corresponding adverse ceded reserve development) and contingent reinsurance assets (ceded underwriting and ceded catastrophes). Counterparty Default Risk
32 Counterparty Default Risk Counterparty Default Risk
33 Counterparty Default Risk Counterparty Default Risk
34 Counterparty Default Risk Questions?
35 Thank you! Bryan Fuller, CPCU, ARe / Director Examination Resources, LLC 116 West 47 th Street, Suite 203 Kansas City, MO Tel. (678) Fax: (816) Cell: (816) bryanfuller@examresources.net
Understanding BCAR for U.S. Property/Casualty Insurers
BEST S METHODOLOGY AND CRITERIA Understanding BCAR for U.S. Property/Casualty Insurers October 13, 2017 Thomas Mount: 1 908 439 2200 Ext. 5155 Thomas.Mount@ambest.com Stephen Irwin: 908 439 2200 Ext. 5454
More informationUnderstanding Best s Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR) for U.S. Property/Casualty Insurers
Understanding Best s Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR) for U.S. Property/Casualty Insurers Analytical Contact March 1, 216 Thomas Mount, Oldwick +1 (98) 439-22 Ext. 5155 Thomas.Mount@ambest.com Understanding
More informationMetropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company ASSETS
ASSETS 2 Current Year Prior Year 1 2 3 4 Net Admitted Nonadmitted Assets Net Assets Assets (Cols. 1-2) Admitted Assets 1. Bonds (Schedule D)......2,881,506,666...0...2,881,506,666...2,931,285,752 2. Stocks
More informationCOMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION COMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER, 0 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE GROUP its affiliated property casualty
More informationMetropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company ASSETS
ASSETS 2 Current Year Prior Year 1 2 3 4 Net Admitted Nonadmitted Assets Net Assets Assets (Cols. 1-2) Admitted Assets 1. Bonds (Schedule D)......3,207,036,987...0...3,207,036,987...2,881,506,666 2. Stocks
More informationCOMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION COMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER, 0 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE Zurich American Insurance Company Affiliates its affiliated
More informationA. General comments. October 27, 2012
AEGON N.V./Transamerica comments on Comparing Certain Aspects of the Insurance Supervisory and Regulatory Regimes in the European Union and the United States October 27, 2012 AEGON appreciates the opportunity
More informationNAIC Reinsurance Evaluation Office Proposal to Grant Credit for Ceded Reinsurance
NAIC Reinsurance Evaluation Office Proposal to Grant Credit for Ceded Reinsurance October 31, 2006 Draft I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Did the Task Force identify such variations? During the Joint Meeting of the
More information69O Credit for Reinsurance from Eligible Reinsurers (7-7-08) (1) Purpose. Paragraph (3)(e) of section gives the Commissioner the
69O-144.007 Credit for Reinsurance from Eligible Reinsurers (7-7-08) (1) Purpose. Paragraph (3)(e) of section 624.610 gives the Commissioner the option to allow credit for reinsurance without full collateral
More informationCOMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE
*00000000* PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION COMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER, 0 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. its affiliated
More informationCOMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION COMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER, 0 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE ALLSTATE INSURANCE GROUP its affiliated property casualty
More informationCh. 161 QUALIFIED AND CERTIFIED REINSURERS CHAPTER 161. REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFIED AND CERTIFIED REINSURERS
Ch. 161 QUALIFIED AND CERTIFIED REINSURERS 31 161.1 CHAPTER 161. REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFIED AND CERTIFIED REINSURERS Sec. 161.1. Purpose. 161.2. Definitions. 161.3. Credit for reinsurance. 161.3a. Requirements
More informationCOMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE
*00000000* PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION COMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER, 0 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. its affiliated
More informationCOMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 of the Condition and Affairs of the. Infinity Property & Casualty Insurance Group
COMBINED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES ASSOCIATION EDITION *02160200420100100* COMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 of the Condition and Affairs of the and its affiliated property
More informationInsurance Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE INSURANCE REGULATION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER CREDIT FOR REINSURANCE
Insurance Chapter 482-1-156 ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE INSURANCE REGULATION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 482-1-156 CREDIT FOR REINSURANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS 482-1-156-.01 Authority 482-1-156-.02 Purpose
More informationMetropolitan Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company ASSETS
ASSETS Current Year Prior Year 1 2 3 4 Net Admitted Nonadmitted Assets Net Assets Assets (Cols. 1-2) Admitted Assets 1. Bonds (Schedule D)......351,261,854...0...351,261,854...369,773,387 2. Stocks (Schedule
More informationNAIC Group Code 0008 NAIC Company Code Combined Statement Contact Lynn Cirrincione, (Area Code) (Telephone Number)
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION COMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER, 00 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY AND ITS AFFILIATED its affiliated
More informationNAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL
NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL Created by the NAIC Group Solvency Issues Working Group Of the Solvency Modernization Initiatives (EX) Task Force 2011 National Association
More informationNAIC Group Code 0008 NAIC Company Code 00086
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION COMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER, 0 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE ALLSTATE INSURANCE GROUP its affiliated property casualty
More information2015 Statutory Combined Annual Statement Schedule P Disclosure
2015 Statutory Combined Annual Statement Schedule P Disclosure This disclosure provides supplemental facts and methodologies intended to enhance understanding of Schedule P reserve data. It provides additional
More informationCOMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES ASSOCIATION EDITION COMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER, 00 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY its affiliated property casualty
More informationTWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ASSETS
ASSETS Current Year Prior Year 1 2 3 4 Net Admitted Nonadmitted Assets Net Assets Assets (Cols. 1-2) Admitted Assets 1. Bonds (Schedule D)......595,649,174...0...595,649,174...592,035,687 2. Stocks (Schedule
More informationCOMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 of the Condition and Affairs of the
COMBINED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION *00914201520100100* COMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 of the Condition and Affairs of the and its affiliated
More informationAssessing the Impact of Reinsurance on Insurers Solvency under Different Regulatory Regimes
Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Working Paper 70136 Assessing the Impact of Reinsurance on Insurers Solvency under Different
More informationMetropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Company ASSETS
ASSETS Current Year Prior Year 1 2 3 4 Net Admitted Nonadmitted Assets Net Assets Assets (Cols. 1-2) Admitted Assets 1. Bonds (Schedule D)......29,421,421...0...29,421,421...28,718,306 2. Stocks (Schedule
More informationCOMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT
COMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and its affiliated property and casualty insurers of TO THE Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED December 31, 2014 PROPERTY AND
More informationNAIC BLANKS (E) WORKING GROUP
NAIC BLANKS (E) WORKING GROUP Blanks Agenda Item Submission Form DATE: 12/12/2016 CONTACT PERSON: Eva Yeung TELEPHONE: (816) 783-8407 EMAIL ADDRESS: eyeung@naic.org ON BEHALF OF: NAME: John Finston & Tom
More informationAnnual Statement for the year 2016 of the GENWORTH FINANCIAL ASSURANCE CORPORATION ASSETS
ASSETS Current Year Prior Year 1 2 3 4 Net Admitted Nonadmitted Assets Net Assets Assets (Cols. 1-2) Admitted Assets 1. Bonds (Schedule D)......6,466,142......6,466,142...6,161,492 2. Stocks (Schedule
More informationTHE INSURANCE BUSINESS (SOLVENCY) RULES 2015
THE INSURANCE BUSINESS (SOLVENCY) RULES 2015 Table of Contents Part 1 Introduction... 2 Part 2 Capital Adequacy... 4 Part 3 MCR... 7 Part 4 PCR... 10 Part 5 - Internal Model... 23 Part 6 Valuation... 34
More informationNATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY ASSETS
ASSETS Current Year Prior Year 1 2 3 4 Net Admitted Nonadmitted Assets Net Assets Assets (Cols. 1-2) Admitted Assets 1. Bonds (Schedule D)......13,448,897,591......13,448,897,591...12,596,064,815 2. Stocks
More informationStatutory Statement Contact Jennifer Gravelle (Area Code) (Telephone Number) (Extension)
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION *12954201620100100* ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 of the Condition and Affairs of the NAIC Group Code...0000, 0000 NAIC Company
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE ADRIATIC INS CO
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE ADRIATIC INS CO NAIC Group Code 0000, 0000 NAIC Company Code
More informationManagement's Discussion and Analysis
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY December 31, 2016 Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ( MD&A ) addresses the financial condition of New York Life Insurance
More informationOFFICERS Name Title Name Title 1. Glorimar Rivero President 2. Mary Letty Hernandez Treasurer 3. Maria S. Toledo Secretary 4.
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION *30953201420100100* ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended December 31, 2014 of the Condition and Affairs of the NAIC Group Code...626, 626 NAIC Company
More information44 NJR 2(2) February 21, 2012 Filed January 26, Proposed New Rules: N.J.A.C. 11:2-28.7A through 28.7D, 28.13, 28.
INSURANCE 44 NJR 2(2) February 21, 2012 Filed January 26, 2012 DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE OFFICE OF SOLVENCY REGULATION Credit for Reinsurance Proposed New Rules: N.J.A.C. 11:2-28.7A through 28.7D,
More informationASSETS ªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªª ªªªªªªªªª ªªªªªªªªªª ªªªªªªªªª ªªªªªªª
ASSETS Current Year Prior Year 1 2 3 4 Net Admitted Nonadmitted Assets Net Admitted Assets Assets (Cols. 1-2) Assets ªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªªª
More informationNorthern Capital Insurance Company
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE Northern Capital Insurance Company of Miami in the state of Florida 2009 TO THE Insurance Department OF THE STATE OF Florida For the Year Ended December 31, 2009 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY
More informationAnnual Statement for the year 2016 of the GENWORTH MORTGAGE INSURANCE CORPORATION ASSETS
ASSETS Current Year Prior Year 1 2 3 4 Net Admitted Nonadmitted Assets Net Assets Assets (Cols. 1-2) Admitted Assets 1. Bonds (Schedule D)......2,143,854,390......2,143,854,390...1,720,265,375 2. Stocks
More informationIn various tables, use of - indicates not meaningful or not applicable.
Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures 2008 For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Credit Suisse Group, Credit Suisse, the Group, we, us and our mean Credit Suisse Group AG
More informationCOMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT
COMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND ITS TO THE Insurance Department OF THE STATE OF FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER, 0 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 0 ANNUAL STATEMENT BLANK ALPHABETICAL
More informationAspen Bermuda Limited. Financial Statements. (With Independent Auditor s Report Thereon) December 31, 2012 and 2011
Financial Statements (With Independent Auditor s Report Thereon) ABCD KPMG Audit Limited Crown House 4 Par-la-Ville Road Hamilton HM 08 Bermuda Mailing Address: P.O. Box HM 906 Hamilton HM DX Bermuda Telephone
More informationPuerto Rico Medical Defense Insurance Company ASSETS
ASSETS Current Year Prior Year 1 2 3 4 Net Admitted Nonadmitted Assets Net Assets Assets (Cols. 1-2) Admitted Assets 1. Bonds (Schedule D)......10,162,799......10,162,799...8,059,339 2. Stocks (Schedule
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR 2015 OF THE MGIC INDEMNITY CORPORATION ASSETS
ASSETS 1 Assets Current Year 2 Nonadmitted Assets 3 Net Admitted Assets (Cols. 1-2) Prior Year 4 Net Admitted Assets 1. Bonds (Schedule D) 2. Stocks (Schedule D): 2.1 Preferred stocks 2.2 Common stocks
More informationReinsurance (Passing grade for this exam is 74)
Supplemental Background Material NAIC Examiner Project Course CFE 3 (Passing grade for this exam is 74) Please note that this study guide is a tool for learning the materials you need to effectively study
More informationYears ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 with Report of Independent Auditors
Harco National Insurance Company and Affiliates Combined Audited Financial Statements - Statutory Basis Years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 with Report of Independent Auditors Harco National Insurance
More informationBasel II Pillar 3 disclosures
Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures 6M10 For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Credit Suisse, the Group, we, us and our mean Credit Suisse Group AG and its consolidated
More informationASOCIACION DE SUSCRIPCION CONJUNTA DEL SEGURO DE RESPONSABILIDAD OBLIGATORIO
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE ASOCIACION DE SUSCRIPCION CONJUNTA DEL SEGURO DE RESPONSABILIDAD OBLIGATORIO of SAN JUAN in the state of TO THE Insurance Department OF THE STATE OF Puerto Rico For the Year Ended
More informationINSURANCE EXPENSE EXHIBIT
INSURANCE EXPENSE EXHIBIT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 (To Be Filed by April 1) Of The (Name) ADDRESS (City, State and Zip Code) NAIC Group Code NAIC Company Code Employer's Identification Number
More informationReinsurance 101: an Overview Session 107
Reinsurance 101: an Overview Session 107 Monday, June 9, 2014 1:30pm 3:00pm IASA 86 TH ANNUAL EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCE & BUSINESS SHOW Introductions Tim Corley Tim is a Senior Solutions Executive for Inpoint
More informationCOMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES ASSOCIATION EDITION COMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER, 00 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE its affiliated property casualty insurers NAIC Group Code
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT. Missouri Employers Mutual Insurance Company
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE Missouri Employers Mutual Insurance Company Of Columbia in the state of MO to the Insurance Department of the state of Missouri For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 PROPERTY AND
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE AMERICAN STATES PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY TO THE. Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE AMERICAN STATES PREFERRED of in the state of INDIANAPOLIS INDIANA TO THE Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED December 31, 2011 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 2011 PROPERTY AND
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ending December 31, 2016 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE MOUNT BEACON INSURANCE COMPANY
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION 15592201620100100 2016 Document Code: 201 ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ending December 31, 2016 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE MOUNT BEACON INSURANCE
More informationHawaii Employers' Mutual Insurance Company, Inc.
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION *10781201220100100* ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 of the Condition and Affairs of the NAIC Group Code..., NAIC Company Code...
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended DECEMBER 31, 2016 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE Safepoint Insurance Company
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended DECEMBER 31, 216 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE Safepoint Insurance Company 15341216211 216 Document Code:
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE Of Madison in the state of WI to the Insurance Department of the state of For the Year Ended December 31, PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 2016 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION
More informationUnited of Omaha Life Insurance Company A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of (Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company)
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY *69868201722000100* Audited Financial Report United of Omaha Life Insurance Company A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of (Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company) Statutory Financial
More informationMontpelier Reinsurance Ltd. and its subsidiary. Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2014 and 2013 (expressed in millions of U.S.
Montpelier Reinsurance Ltd. and its subsidiary Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated Balance Sheets As at (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars, except share and per share amounts) 2014 2013
More information29th India Fellowship Seminar
29th India Fellowship Seminar Is Risk Based Capital way forward? Adaptability to Indian Context & Comparison of various market consistent measures Guide: Sunil Sharma Presented by: Rakesh Kumar Niraj Kumar
More information(New Matter is Underlined; Matter in Brackets is Deleted) Section Principles of prudent reinsurance credit risk management.
NEW YORK STATE INSURANCE DEPARTMENT PROPOSED TENTH AMENDMENT TO REGULATIONS NO. 17, 20 AND 20-A (11 NYCRR 125) CREDIT FOR REINSURANCE FROM UNAUTHORIZED INSURERS I, James J. Wrynn, Superintendent of Insurance
More informationCOMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES ASSOCIATION EDITION COMBINED ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDING December, 06 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY AND ITS AFFILIATED PROPERTY AND
More informationASSAL. Reinsurance. Walter Bell Alabama Commissioner of Insurance NAIC President
ASSAL Reinsurance Walter Bell Alabama Commissioner of Insurance NAIC President 1 Purpose of Reinsurance Regulation Police the Solvency of Reinsurers and Ceding Insurers Ensure the Collectability of Reinsurance
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE LIBERTY COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY TO THE. Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE COUNTY MUTUAL of in the state of IRVING TEXAS TO THE Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED December 31, 2011 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 2011 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES
More informationBasel II Pillar 3 disclosures 6M 09
Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures 6M 09 For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Credit Suisse Group, Credit Suisse, the Group, we, us and our mean Credit Suisse Group
More information* * PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES ASSOCIATION EDITION
*33790201620100100* PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES ASSOCIATION EDITION ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE RADIAN GUARANTY INC. NAIC Group Code 00766,
More informationREVOKED. Solvency Standard for Non-life Insurance Business in Run-off. Insurance Policy. Prudential Supervision Department
Solvency Standard for Non-life Insurance Business in Run-off Insurance Policy Prudential Supervision Department April 2012 (incorporates amendments to December 2014) 2 1. Introduction 1.1. Authority 1.
More informationStatutory Statement Contact Priscilla Carter (Area Code) (Telephone Number) (Extension)
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION *15989201220100100* ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 of the Condition and Affairs of the NAIC Group Code... 4574, 4574 NAIC Company
More informationSyndicate SCR For 2019 Year of Account Instructions for Submission of the Lloyd s Capital Return and Methodology Document for Capital Setting
Syndicate SCR For 2019 Year of Account Instructions for Submission of the Lloyd s Capital Return and Methodology Document for Capital Setting Guidance Notes June 2018 Contents Introduction 4 Submission
More informationApril 2014 Summary of technical specifications for QIS 1. Singapore RBC 2 Review
April 2014 Summary of technical specifications for QIS 1 Singapore RBC 2 Review 1 Introduction The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) recently issued a second consultation paper on the review of the
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MONTGOMERY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY TO THE. Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MONTGOMERY MUTUAL of in the state of BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS TO THE Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED December 31, 2014 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 2014 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMY INSURANCE COMPANY TO THE. Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMY of in the state of INDIANAPOLIS INDIANA TO THE Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED December 31, 2012 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 2012 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY TO THE. Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE THE OHIO CASUALTY of in the state of FAIRFIELD OHIO TO THE Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED December 31, 21 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 21 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES
More informationTo accurately reflect adjustments made for deferred income tax pursuant to SSAP 101, additional quota share reinsurance recoverable and capital
To accurately reflect adjustments made for deferred income tax pursuant to SSAP 0, additional quota share reinsurance recoverable and capital received. *400000005* PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES ASSOCIATION
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE. Guarantee Insurance Company
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 3, 06 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE Guarantee Insurance Company *3980600005* NAIC Group Code 3493
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS TO THE. Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE SAFECO OF ILLINOIS of in the state of WARRENVILLE ILLINOIS TO THE Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED December 31, 2011 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 2011 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended DECEMBER 31, 2017 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE SIMED
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended DECEMBER 31, 2017 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE SIMED 11078201720100100 2017 Document Code: 201 NAIC Group
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE PEERLESS of in the state of KEENE NEW HAMPSHIRE TO THE Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED December 31, 21 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 21 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES -
More informationStatutory Statement Contact Jon Ritchie (Area Code) (Telephone Number) (Extension)
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION *840600000* ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended December 3, 06 of the Condition and Affairs of the NAIC Group Code... 0, 0 NAIC Company Code... 84
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE Of Madison in the state of WI to the Insurance Department of the state of For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 2015 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION
More informationJ.P Morgan Fixed Income Conference. March 2004
J.P Morgan Fixed Income Conference March 2004 Forward Looking Statements and Basis of Presentation This presentation may include forward looking statements that contain words and phrases such as may, expects,
More informationCatastrophe Exposures & Insurance Industry Catastrophe Management Practices. American Academy of Actuaries Catastrophe Management Work Group
Catastrophe Exposures & Insurance Industry Catastrophe Management Practices American Academy of Actuaries Catastrophe Management Work Group Overview Introduction What is a Catastrophe? Insurer Capital
More informationAMENDED EXPLANATION COVER. QBE Seguros. Amended Explanation 2016
AMENDED EXPLANATION COVER QBE Seguros Amended Explanation 06 Subsequent to original submission, corrections were identified in the calculation of Risk-Based Capital. These corrections reduce the ACL from
More informationBUSINESS UPDATE Through June 8, 2017
Our Mission is to provide quality insurance security and related services to businesses, individuals and public institutions, and be a dependable long-term steward of the trust that policyholders and shareholders
More information* * PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES ASSOCIATION EDITION
*09080600000* PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES ASSOCIATION EDITION ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended December, 06 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE Capitol Preferred Insurance Company, Inc NAIC Group
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE CORPORATION TO THE. Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE GOLDEN EAGLE CORPORATION of in the state of SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA TO THE Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED December 31, 29 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 29 ANNUAL STATEMENT
More informationANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE IRONSHORE INDEMNITY INC.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE IRONSHORE INDEMNITY INC. of in the state of MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA TO THE Insurance Department OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDED December 31, 2017 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 2017 PROPERTY AND
More informationStatutory Statement Contact Priscilla Carter (Area Code) (Telephone Number) (Extension)
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION *24503201320100100* ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 of the Condition and Affairs of the NAIC Group Code... 4574, 4574 NAIC Company
More informationLloyd s Minimum Standards MS7 Reinsurance Management and Control
Lloyd s Minimum Standards MS7 Reinsurance Management and Control January 2019 2 Contents MS7 Reinsurance Management & Control 3 Minimum Standards and Requirements 3 Management guidance 3 Definitions 3
More informationNAIC Group Code 0008 NAIC Company Code Employer s ID Number
NAIC Group Code 0008 NAIC Company Code 00086 Employer s ID Number 36-07196665 Allstate Insurance Group Combined Management Discussion and Analysis For the Year Ended December 31, 2003 Allstate Insurance
More informationASOCIACION DE SUSCRIPCION CONJUNTA DEL SEGURO DE RESPONSABILIDAD OBLIGATORIO
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE ASOCIACION DE SUSCRIPCION CONJUNTA DEL SEGURO DE RESPONSABILIDAD OBLIGATORIO of SAN JUAN in the state of Puerto Rico 2016 TO THE Insurance Department OF THE STATE OF Puerto Rico
More informationORDER PUBLISHING OPTIONAL UNDERWRITING PROFIT AND CONTINGENCY FACTORS CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE , FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
FILED JUN 0 2 2016 OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION Docketed by: ~ DAVID ALTMAIER COMMISSIONER IN THE MATTER OF: 2015 Profit and Contingency Factors ~~~~~~~~~~~..! CASE NO.: 191997-16 ORDER PUBLISHING OPTIONAL
More informationOFFICERS Name Title Name Title 1. Victor Jose Salgado Jr President 2. Ana Maria Salgado Secretary 3. Ana Maria Salgado Treasurer 4.
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION *67780700000* ANNUAL STATEMENT For the Year Ended December 3, 07 of the Condition and Affairs of the NAIC Group Code... 0, 0 NAIC Company Code... 6778
More informationWestern Captive Insurance Company DAC. Solvency and Financial Condition Report. For Financial Year Ending 31 st December 2016 (the reporting period )
Western Captive Insurance Company DAC Solvency and Financial Condition Report For Financial Year Ending 31 st December 2016 (the reporting period ) 1 Executive Summary Western Captive Insurance Company
More informationSyndicate SCR For 2019 Year of Account Instructions for Submission of the Lloyd s Capital Return and Methodology Document for Capital Setting
Syndicate SCR For 2019 Year of Account Instructions for Submission of the Lloyd s Capital Return and Methodology Document for Capital Setting Guidance Notes August 2018 Contents Introduction 4 Submission
More informationGUERNSEY NEW RISK BASED INSURANCE SOLVENCY REQUIREMENTS
GUERNSEY NEW RISK BASED INSURANCE SOLVENCY REQUIREMENTS Introduction The Guernsey Financial Services Commission has published a consultation paper entitled Evolving Insurance Regulation. The paper proposes
More informationECONOMIC CAPITAL MODELING CARe Seminar JUNE 2016
ECONOMIC CAPITAL MODELING CARe Seminar JUNE 2016 Boston Catherine Eska The Hanover Insurance Group Paul Silberbush Guy Carpenter & Co. Ronald Wilkins - PartnerRe Economic Capital Modeling Safe Harbor Notice
More informationMethodology Review Seminar
etc.venues St.Paul s, London Methodology Review Seminar 16 November 2016 Methodology Review Seminar Welcome and Introduction Overview of the Structural Changes to Best's Credit Rating Methodology Greg
More informationA.M. Best s Updated Credit Rating Methodology and Capital Model. Robert Raber Senior Financial Analyst A.M. Best Company
A.M. Best s Updated Credit Rating Methodology and Capital Model Robert Raber Senior Financial Analyst A.M. Best Company 1 Contents A.M. Best Company Overview Updated Best s Credit Rating Methodology (BCRM)
More informationERM in the Rating Process: A Practical Perspective
ERM in the Rating Process: A Practical Perspective Jeffrey Mango, Group Vice President, A.M. Best Michelle Baurkot, Assistant Vice President, A.M. Best Tom Zitelli, Managing Senior Financial Analyst, A.M.
More information* * PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION
*36740600000* PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 3, 06 OF THE CONDITION AND AFFAIRS OF THE AIG Insurance Company - Puerto Rico NAIC Group
More information