KPERS Death and Disability Benefit Plan. Annual Report and Interim Actuarial Valuation As of June 30, 2015
|
|
- Ariel Cross
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 KPERS Death and Disability Benefit Plan Annual Report and Interim Actuarial Valuation As of June 30, 2015 Prepared by: Daniel D. Skwire, FSA, MAAA Principal and Consulting Actuary Milliman, Inc. Tasha S. Khan, FSA, MAAA Consulting Actuary Milliman, Inc. March 17, 2016
2 Table of Contents Actuarial Certification Letter Section 1: Introduction and Executive Summary... 3 Section 2: Interim Valuation... 6 Section 3: Cashflow Projections Appendices A. Data for the Valuation B. Summary of Plan Provisions C. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions D. Experience Exhibits E. Gain-Loss Exhibit for
3 March 17, 2016 Page 1 March 17, 2016 Board of Trustees Kansas Public Employees Retirement System 611 S. Kansas Ave., Suite 100 Topeka, KS Re: KPERS Death and Disability Interim Valuation as of June 30, 2015 The actuarial valuation of the KPERS Death and Disability Plan ( Plan ) under the requirements of GASB Statement No. 43, Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefit Plans Other Than Pension Plans, is performed in alternate years at the request of the KPERS Board of Directors. Since a full valuation was performed last year, we have performed an interim actuarial valuation of the KPERS Death and Disability Plan as of June 30, The major findings of the interim valuation are contained in this report. This report reflects the benefit provisions and contribution rates in effect as of June 30, In preparing this report we relied, without audit, on information (some oral and some in writing) supplied by KPERS staff. This information includes, but is not limited to, statutory provisions, employee data and financial information. In our examination of these data, we have found them to be reasonably consistent and comparable with data used for other purposes. Since the valuation results are dependent on the integrity of the data supplied, the results can be expected to differ if the underlying data is incomplete or missing. It should be noted that if any data or other information is inaccurate or incomplete, our calculations may need to be revised. On the basis of the foregoing, we hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, this report is complete and accurate and has been prepared in accordance with generally recognized and accepted actuarial principles and practices which are consistent with the Actuarial Standards of Practice promulgated by the Actuarial Standards Board and the applicable Guides to Professional Conduct, amplifying Opinions, and supporting Recommendations of the American Academy of Actuaries. We further certify that all costs, liabilities, rates of interest, and other factors used or provided in this report have been determined on the basis of actuarial assumptions and methods which are individually reasonable (taking into account the experience of the Plan and reasonable expectations); and which, in combination, offer our best estimate of anticipated experience affecting the Plan. This interim valuation report is only an estimate of the Plan s financial condition as of a single date. It can neither predict the Plan s future condition nor guarantee future financial soundness. Actuarial valuations do not affect the ultimate cost of Plan benefits, only the timing of Plan contributions. While the valuation is based on an array of individually reasonable assumptions, other assumption sets may also be reasonable and valuation results based on those assumptions would be different. No one set of assumptions is uniquely correct. Determining results using alternative assumptions is outside the scope of our engagement.
4 March 17, 2016 Page 2 Future actuarial measurements may differ significantly from the current measurements presented in this report due to such factors as the following: plan experience differing from that anticipated by the economic or demographic assumptions; changes in economic or demographic assumptions; increases or decreases expected as part of the natural operation of the methodology used for these measurements (such as the end of an amortization period or additional cost or contribution requirements based on the plan's funded status); and changes in plan provisions or applicable law. Due to the limited scope of our assignment, we did not perform an analysis of the potential range of future measurements. The Board of Trustees has the final decision regarding the appropriateness of the assumptions and actuarial cost methods, and the Board has adopted them as indicated in Appendix C. Milliman s work is prepared solely for the use and benefit of KPERS for a specific and limited purpose. To the extent that Milliman s work is not subject to disclosure under applicable public record laws, Milliman s work may not be provided to third parties without Milliman s prior written consent. Milliman does not intend to benefit or create a legal duty to any third party recipient of its work product. Milliman s consent to release its work product to any third party may be conditioned on the third party signing a Release, subject to the following exceptions: (a) KPERS may provide a copy of Milliman s work, in its entirety, to its professional service advisors who are subject to a duty of confidentiality and who agree to not use Milliman s work for any purpose other than to benefit KPERS; and (b) KPERS may provide a copy of Milliman s work, in its entirety, to other governmental entities as required by law. The consultants who worked on this assignment are actuaries. Milliman s advice is not intended to be a substitute for qualified legal or accounting counsel. We respectfully submit the following report, and we look forward to discussing it with you. I, Daniel D. Skwire, FSA, MAAA, am a consulting actuary for Milliman, Inc. I am a member of the American Academy of Actuaries and meet the Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actuaries to render the actuarial opinion contained herein. I, Tasha S. Khan, FSA, MAAA, am a consulting actuary for Milliman, Inc. I am a member of the American Academy of Actuaries and meet the Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actuaries to render the actuarial opinion contained herein. Sincerely, Daniel D. Skwire, FSA, MAAA Consulting Actuary Tasha S. Khan, FSA, MAAA Consulting Actuary
5 Section 1: Introduction and Executive Summary This report contains the June 30, 2015 interim actuarial valuation for the KPERS Death and Disability Plan. This plan provides two primary benefits to active members: 1. Group life insurance equal to 150% of annual compensation, which is provided through an insurance contract with Minnesota Life. 2. Self-insured long term disability (LTD) benefits equal to 60% (for claims incurred prior to 1/1/2006, 66 2/3%) of annual compensation, offset by other benefits. Members receiving LTD benefits also receive service credit toward their retirement benefits under KPERS (which does not affect calculations for the Death and Disability Plan) and have their group life insurance coverage continued under the waiver of premium provision. For those employees covered under the waiver of premium provision, the group life insurance benefit is increased annually for inflation, at a rate equal to the consumer price index less one percent, beginning five years following the date of disability. The scope of the interim annual actuarial valuation includes the LTD and waiver benefits described in Item 2 above. They do not include the fully-insured group life insurance benefit. This report contains only the historical analysis and cashflow projections based on our illustrative reserve basis. Because the actuarial valuation of the plan under the requirements of GASB Statement No. 43, Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefit Plans Other Than Pension Plans, is performed in alternate years at the request of the KPERS Board of Directors, this report provides an interim valuation as of June 30, A full valuation under GASB 43 will be performed as of June 30, Elements included in the GASB 43 valuation, but not in the interim valuation, include calculation of the actuarial liability pertaining to active lives, calculation of the annual required contribution (ARC) and preparation of the required disclosure schedules. Also note that GASB has adopted new accounting standards: GASB 74 will replace GASB 43 for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2016, and GASB 75 will replace GASB 45 for fiscal years beginning after June 15, These new accounting standards will have a significant impact for the KPERS Death and Disability Plan and the government-wide financial statements of participating employers in the plan. The impact of adopting GASB statements 74 and 75 is outside the scope of our assignment. The key results from each section of this report are summarized below. Interim Valuation The historical analysis shows a decreasing pattern in LTD claims and LTD claim payments over the past nine years. Waiver death benefits in are consistent with historical patterns. The downward trend for LTD claims may be driven by lower claim incidence, as well as an increasing focus on managing LTD claims and assisting claimants in rehabilitation and return to work. They may also 3
6 be driven by the gradual impact on overall experience of the lower benefit percentage on new claims incurred 1/1/2006 and later. Generally, however, we expect to see a modestly increasing trend in LTD and waiver benefits due to the aging of the population and the increasing salaries of active members. The valuation assumptions have been updated as of 6/30/2015 to reflect recent trends in plan experience as well as industry best practice. Claim termination rates for LTD have been increased, along with an increase in estimated Social Security offsets. These changes have resulted in a modest decrease in the LTD liability estimates. The mortality and recovery rates for life waiver have also been updated for recent experience, though the impact of these changes on the open claim liability estimate is negligible. These changes are discussed in more detail in the letter dated March 17, Under the prior valuation basis (2014 KPERS Basis), the total disabled life liability decreased from $151.4 million to $144.0 million from 6/30/2014 to 6/30/2015, due primarily to a reduction in the number of open LTD claims. When the 6/30/2015 liabilities are recomputed using the new basis (2015 KPERS Basis), the total disabled life liability decreases to $138.4 million. Liability runoff tests performed on the illustrative liability balances for LTD and waiver claims indicate that the 6/30/2014 balances were sufficient to fund the actual and projected future costs that emerged during the fiscal year with respect to members disabled as of 6/30/2014. Projected Cashflows Table 1.1 contains the projected cashflows for the KPERS Death and Disability Fund for the next five years: Table 1.1 Five-Year Cashflow Projection Expected Benefits and Expenses v. Expected Contributions (millions) Excludes Group Life Insurance for Active Members Excludes Impact of Funding Moratoriums Plan Year Projected Benefits and Expenses Projected Contributions $29.1 $ $30.4 $ $32.0 $ $33.5 $ $35.0 $64.9 Table 1.1 indicates that the projected contributions are expected to exceed the projected benefits and expenses for each of the next five years, according to the assumptions used for the actuarial valuation, and assuming that the current contribution rate of 1.00% (which includes approximately 0.20% of payroll for group life insurance) remains unchanged. This pattern would result in an increase in plan assets over the 5-year time horizon. Any contribution moratoriums implemented by the Legislature will have the impact of spending down increases in the plan s assets. The Legislature has approved a contribution moratorium which is scheduled to begin on 4/1/2016, and continue through 6/30/
7 The cashflow projections include self-insured benefits only. They do not include the cost of insurance premiums for the fully insured group life benefit or the projected contributions intended to cover those premiums. Also, the projections are on a best-estimate basis consistent with the liability calculations, which means they do not include an explicit margin. To the extent that KPERS requires a more conservative benefit projection for the purpose of determining funding contributions, it may wish to consider adding a margin of 5-10% to the benefits and expenses projected. 5
8 Section 2: Interim Valuation This section of the report provides an historical experience analysis, addressing recent claim trends, the recommended change in valuation assumptions for 2015, and an analysis of liability balances and runoffs pertaining to disabled lives. Claim Trends Table 2.1 below shows the number of open LTD claims at the end of each plan year, and the amount of LTD benefit payments made during each plan year: Table 2.1 LTD Claims and Payments (Payments in millions) Plan Year Open LTD Claims LTD Claim Payments ,683 $ ,890 $ ,955 $ ,116 $ ,098 $ ,097 $ ,995 $ ,889 $ ,882 $ ,833 $ ,781 $ ,641 $ ,521 $21.4* ,401 $21.3 * NOTE: The LTD claim payments have been restated due to a data issue affecting last year s results. Table 2.1 shows a decreasing trend in both the number of LTD claims and the amount of LTD claim payments over the past 9-10 years. This decreasing pattern may result, at least in part, from a greater focus on managing LTD claims and assisting claimants in rehabilitation and return to work, as well as the gradual impact on overall experience of plan changes such as the reduction in the benefit percentage (from 66 2/3% to 60%) for claims incurred in 2006 and later. There is also evidence that the plan is experiencing lower than expected claim incidence rates, meaning there are fewer new claims per 1,000 employees. Over the long term, however, we expect the increasing trend to resume (though perhaps at a more modest rate than in the past) since claim volumes for a plan tend to increase as a population either increases in size, or remains of similar size but increases in age. In addition, LTD claim payments are prone to increase as the result of higher salaries, even for a population that remains otherwise unchanged. 6
9 Table 2.2 below shows the number and amount of waiver death claims during recent plan years: Table 2.2 Waiver Death Claims and Payments (Payments in millions) Plan Year Waiver Death Claims Waiver Claim Payments $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $5.1 The number and amount of waiver death claims in is consistent with historical trends. There will be annual variation in mortality rates, measured by both claim count and benefit amount, on a population of this size. In general, we expect a stable or increasing trend in future waiver claim payments, reflecting the impact of an aging population, salary increases and indexing of death benefits, partially offset by gradual mortality improvement and slower growth in the number of outstanding long term disability claims. Additional data on LTD and waiver claims from the plan year is contained in Appendix D. We have included the experience in this same format for comparative purposes. Updated Valuation Assumptions We have implemented new valuation assumptions for the Death and Disability plan, to be effective as of 6/30/2015. These assumptions are provided in Appendix C of this report, and the development of these assumptions is discussed in the letter dated March 17, The objectives for the new assumptions included the following: To reflect recent historical experience trends for the plan; To produce estimates of plan liabilities that will more accurately reflect the expected actuarial present value of future benefits; and To produce cashflow projections that are consistent with recent historical trends and that will serve as a useful tool for planning and budgeting purposes. 7
10 The new assumptions include the following three items: 1. Claim termination rates 2. Mortality for life waiver claims 3. Estimated benefit offsets Each of the new assumptions is described below, with further detail in Appendix C. Claim Termination Rates Claim termination rates are used to project the death and recovery rates for disabled lives when determining the liability for disabled lives and projecting future cashflows. The updated assumption was developed from a study of actual claim terminations in The results of this study indicated that there had been modest changes in claim termination rates relative to the prior valuation assumption. There is also a new industry claim termination rate table available (the 2012 Group Long-Term Disability Table) which represents more recent industry experience, and which is reflected in the updated valuation basis. When the new industry table is adjusted for KPERS experience, the result is a modest decrease in LTD claim liabilities. Mortality for Waiver Claims The mortality assumption for life waiver claims is used to project the amount of death benefits paid to disabled lives. The updated assumption for 6/30/2015 was developed from a study of actual waiver death claims from 7/1/2011 through 6/30/2015. The pattern of actual deaths relative to the number of deaths predicted by the industry table, by gender and by duration of claim, was somewhat different than what was assumed under the prior valuation assumptions. The updated valuation basis therefore reflects updated modifications to the 2005 Society of Actuaries Life Waiver Table. Estimated Benefit Offsets LTD benefits paid under the Death and Disability Plan are reduced by the amount of benefits a claimant receives from the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) program. Although claimants are eligible to receive SSDI benefits after 5 months of disability, it often takes many years to be approved by the Social Security Administration to receive these benefits. For claims within the first three years of disability that have not yet been approved for SSDI, an estimated SSDI offset is reflected in the liability calculations. These estimated offsets are based on the probability of ultimately receiving SSDI benefits, combined with the likely amount of these benefits. A study of recent plan experience revealed that both the probability and the amount of SSDI offsets has increased since the prior study, so the table of estimated offset factors reflected in the 6/30/2015 valuation basis has 8
11 been updated to reflect this more recent plan experience. This updated table is expected to produce future projected cashflows on disabled lives that are more consistent with the expected payments. The net impact of the new valuation basis is a modest reduction to the liability balances for the plan and to the projected cashflows. The proposed basis produces results that are more in line with recent experience and industry best practices, and are therefore a better estimate of liabilities and of future cashflows. Historical Disabled Life Liability Balances Table 2.3 below provides the LTD and Waiver liability balances for disabled lives for 2014 and The liability balances shown below are for the purposes of historical comparison only. They are a subset of the total liability amounts, since they do not include the liability for active lives or for administrative expenses. Table 2.3 Disabled Life Liability Balances for Death and Disability Fund 2014 KPERS Basis 2015 KPERS Basis Liability Item 6/30/2014 6/30/2015 6/30/2015 Open Claims: LTD $113,738,555 $106,845,106 $103,048,015 Open Claims: LTD Amount Recoverable (1,601,872) (1,405,584) (1,405,584) Open Claims: Waiver 21,514,183 20,262,164 20,275,070 IBNR Claims: LTD Future Benefits 14,112,066 14,535,428 12,874,236 IBNR Claims: LTD Past Benefits 146, , ,509 IBNR Claims: Waiver Benefits 3,460,889 3,571,851 3,433,497 Total Disabled Life Liability 151,370, ,959, ,358,743 Open LTD Claims 2,521 2,401 2,401 The liabilities in Table 2.3 fall into two broad categories: approved claims and incurred but not reported (IBNR) claims. The liabilities for approved claims reflect the expected future benefit costs for those members who are already receiving disability benefits. (The waiver liability for approved claims reflects expected future death benefits to be paid out of the Death and Disability Fund to currently disabled members). The liabilities for incurred but not reported claims reflect the expected benefit costs, both past due and future payments, for members who have already become disabled, but whose claims have not yet been reported to or approved for payment by KPERS. Under the 2014 KPERS valuation basis (prior to updates), the total disabled life liability decreased from $151.4 million to $144.0 million from 6/30/2014 to 6/30/2015, due primarily to a reduction in the number of open LTD claims. When the 6/30/2015 liabilities are recomputed using the 2015 KPERS basis, the total disabled life liability decreases to $138.4 million. 9
12 Liability Runoff Test In order to validate the assumptions used to develop the 6/30/2015 disabled life liabilities, we performed a liability runoff test on the liability for approved claims on the LTD plan as of 6/30/2014. The results of this test are shown in Table 2.4 below: Table 2.4 Liability Runoff Test for Approved LTD Claims at 6/30/2014 PV as of 6/30/2014 (A) Liability for approved claims as of 6/30/2014 $109,780,907 (B) PV of payments for plan year, on claims open at 6/30/ ,192,115 (C) PV of 6/30/2015 liability for claims open on 6/30/ ,451,236 (D) Margin in liability calculation (A-B-C) $2,137,556 NOTE: PV means the present value at 4.0% interest The goal of a liability runoff test is to determine whether the liability computed on a given date with a certain set of assumptions would have been sufficient to fund the cost of actual and expected future payments for the claims open on that date. Row A of Table 2.4 is the liability for open claims at 6/30/2014, restated using the 2015 valuation assumptions. Rows B and C, taken together, are the cost of actual claims paid through 6/30/2015 and expected future payments for those claims after 6/30/2015. Row D is the excess of the 6/30/2014 liability over the actual and expected future payments. The fact that Row D is a positive value means that the 6/30/2014 liability for approved LTD claims, as calculated under the updated valuation assumptions, was more than sufficient to fund the actual and projected future costs that emerged during the plan year. A liability margin of 1% to 5% of the starting liability balance is a reasonable target for this type of plan. It is important to note, however, that experience will vary from year to year. Margins outside this range for a given time period warrant closer review. When margins outside of this range persist, future updates to the assumptions may be appropriate. The margin of $2,137,556 shown in Table 2.4 represents 1.9% of the starting liability of $109,780,907. In other words, Table 2.4 indicates that the updated claim termination rates used by Milliman in computing the 6/30/2015 LTD liabilities are in the aggregate a reasonable representation of the actual claim termination experience between 6/30/2014 and 6/30/2015. We performed a similar runoff analysis for the waiver of premium liability. The results of the waiver runoff test are shown in Table 2.5 below: 10
13 Table 2.5 Liability Runoff Test for Approved Waiver of Premium Claims at 6/30/2014 PV as of 6/30/2014 (A) Liability for open claims as of 6/30/2014 $21,506,723 (B) PV of payments for plan year, on claims open at 6/30/2014 3,867,612 (C) PV of 6/30/2015 liability for claims open on 6/30/ ,880,742 (D) Margin in liability calculation (A-B-C) $758,369 NOTE: PV means the present value at 4.0% interest The positive margin shown in Table 2.5 represents 3.5% of the starting liability balance. This margin is within our suggested target range of 1% to 5%. 11
14 Section 3: Cashflow Projections Because the Death and Disability Plan is now being managed so that the bulk of annual contributions are required to pay that year s benefits, it is important to consider the expected future benefit cashflows in order to determine the appropriate contribution levels. Table 3.1 below contains the projected benefit cashflows developed by Milliman, using the same updated assumptions that were used in the development of the actuarial liabilities as of 6/30/2015: Table 3.1 Projected Benefit Cashflows for Death and Disability Fund Self-Insured Benefits Only, Excluding Expenses Plan Year LTD Waiver Total (Actual) $24,601,786 $5,259,671 $29,861, (Actual) $24,116,091 $5,049,916 $29,166, (Actual) $22,084,961 $5,644,305 $27,729, (Actual) $21,356,090* $4,767,326 $26,123, (Actual) $21,286,579 $5,138,023 $26,424, $21,493,399 $6,328,814 $27,822, $22,358,718 $6,654,077 $29,012, $23,386,784 $7,214,831 $30,601, $24,247,069 $7,792,458 $32,039, $24,958,408 $8,445,279 $33,403,687 * NOTE: The LTD claim payments have been restated due to a data issue affecting last year s results. The projected benefit payments are the sum of LTD and waiver payments, with waiver payments representing death benefits paid to disabled members. For the LTD and waiver projections, there are three components to the projected payments: Payments on open and approved claims Payments on incurred but not reported claims Payments on new claims incurred in future plan years The projections in Table 3.1 do not include any expected increase in population size, since KPERS expects its membership to remain approximately level in the near future. They do, however, include assumed annual payroll growth as well as a gradual aging of the population. Overall, the total projected payments follow an increasing pattern as the result of these assumptions. They are consistent with the longer-term trends, however, that were the basis for developing the assumptions used for the actuarial valuation. Table 3.1 shows only benefit cashflows and does not include administrative expenses. Table 3.2 below provides projected cashflows for benefits and expenses combined, along with projected contributions, assuming no change in the current contribution rate and no contribution moratoriums. The projected contributions exclude that portion of the contribution rate that pertains to the group life insurance premiums paid for the insured plan that covers active employees. 12
15 Table 3.2 Five-Year Cashflow Projection Expected Benefits and Expenses v. Expected Contributions (millions) Excludes Group Life Insurance for Active Members Excludes Impact of Funding Moratoriums Plan Year Projected Benefits and Expenses Projected Contributions $29.1 $ $30.4 $ $32.0 $ $33.5 $ $35.0 $64.9 Table 3.2 indicates that the projected contributions are expected to exceed the projected benefits and expenses for each of the next five years, according to the assumptions used for the actuarial valuation, and assuming that the current contribution rate of 1.00% (which includes approximately 0.20% of payroll for group life insurance) remains unchanged. This pattern would result in an increase in plan assets over the 5-year time horizon. Any contribution moratoriums implemented by the Legislature will have the impact of spending down increases in the plan s assets. The Legislature has approved a contribution moratorium which is scheduled to begin on 4/1/2016, and continue through 6/30/2017. In developing its own financial projections and budgets, KPERS should consider the following items with regard to the projections in Tables 3.1 and 3.2: The projections include self-insured benefits only. They do not include the cost of insurance premiums for the fully insured group life benefit. The projections include the estimated impact of plan design changes that became effective 1/1/2006. The projections in Table 3.1 include benefit payments only and do not include any expenses or third-party fees. The projections in Table 3.2 do include expenses, however. The projections are on a best-estimate basis consistent with the liability calculations, and they do not include an explicit margin. To the extent that KPERS requires a more conservative benefit projection for the purpose of determining funding contributions, it may wish to consider adding a margin of 5% to 10% to the benefits and expenses projected in Tables 3.1 and 3.2. The projections do not reflect the impact of any contribution moratoriums. 13
16 Appendix A: Data For the Valuation In performing the actuarial valuation, we relied, without audit, on certain data and information provided by UnitedHealthcare (UHC) and KPERS. To the extent any of the data or other information is inaccurate or incomplete, our calculations may need to be revised. The data we used included: LTD active claims listing provided by UHC LTD claim payment detail provided by UHC Death claim listing provided by UHC Additional research by KPERS and UHC for claims with missing or incomplete data Plan descriptions provided by KPERS Active member data provided by KPERS as of 12/31/
17 Appendix B: Summary of Plan Provisions The KPERS Death and Disability Plan is a cost-sharing multiple employer plan that provides long term disability (LTD) and life insurance benefits to eligible employees. Eligible employees consist of all individuals who are: 1. Currently active members of KPERS; 2. Employees of an educational institution under the Kansas Board of Regents as defined in K.S.A ; 3. Elected officials. The plan provides a group life insurance benefit for active members through a fully-insured plan with Minnesota Life Insurance Company. (The coverage will be transitioned to Standard Insurance Company as of July 1, 2016.) Because this benefit is fully insured, it is not included in the scope of this actuarial valuation. The plan also provides a self-funded LTD benefit and a self-funded life insurance benefit for disabled members (referred to as group life waiver of premium ). These items are considered Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEBs) under GASB accounting rules, and they are included in this actuarial valuation. The key provisions of the LTD benefit include the following: Definition of Disability: For the first 24 months following the end of the benefit waiting period, a member is totally disabled if the member is unable to perform the material and substantial duties of his or her regular occupation due to sickness or injury. Thereafter, the member is totally disabled if the member is unable to perform the material and substantial duties of any gainful occupation due to sickness or injury. Benefit Waiting Period: For approved claims, benefits begin on the later of (a) the date the member completes 180 continuous days of total disability; or (b) the date the member ceases to draw compensation from his or her employer. Monthly Benefit: The monthly benefit is 60% of the member s monthly rate of compensation, with a minimum of $100 and a maximum of $5,000. The monthly benefit is subject to reduction by deductible sources of income, which include Social Security primary disability or retirement benefits, worker s compensation benefits, other disability benefits from any other source by reason of employment, and earnings from any form of employment. 15
18 Maximum Benefit Period: If the disability begins before age 60, benefits are payable while disability continues until the member s 65 th birthday or retirement date, whichever first occurs. If the disability occurs at or after age 60, benefits are payable while disability continues, for a period of five years or until the date of the member s retirement, whichever first occurs. Limitation for Mental Illnesses and Substance Abuse: Benefit payments for disabilities caused or contributed to by substance abuse or non-biologically-based mental illnesses are limited to the term of the disability or 24 months per lifetime, whichever is less. There are no automatic cost-of-living increase provisions. KPERS has the authority to implement an ad hoc cost-of-living increase. The key provisions of the group life waiver of premium benefit include the following: Benefit Amount: Upon the death of a member who is receiving monthly disability benefits, the plan will pay a lump-sum benefit to eligible beneficiaries. The benefit amount will be 150% of the greater of (a) the member s annual rate of compensation at the time of disability, or (b) the member s previous 12 months of compensation at the time of the last date on payroll. If the member had been disabled for five or more years, the annual compensation or salary rate at the time of death will be indexed before the life insurance benefit is computed. The indexing is based on the consumer price index, less one percentage point. Accelerated Death Benefit: If a member is diagnosed as terminally ill with a life expectancy of 24 months or less, he or she may be eligible to receive up to 100% of the death benefit rather than having the benefit paid to the beneficiary. Conversion Right: If a member retires or disability benefits end, he or she may convert the group life insurance coverage to an individual life insurance policy. 16
19 Appendix C: Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Rate of Investment Return 4.0% per annum, net of expenses LTD Claim Termination Rates Age at Disability Table C.1 Claim Termination Rates as % of 2012 Group Long-Term Disability Table (Based on Actual KPERS Experience) Claim Duration (Months) Under 30 50% 80% 80% 100% 80% 100% 150% % 80% 80% 100% 80% 100% 150% % 80% 80% 100% 80% 100% 150% % 100% 100% 150% 150% 300% 300% 60 and Over 300% 300% 300% 300% 300% 300% 300% All claim termination rates for claims in months 121 and later are assumed to be 300% of the table for attained ages 60 and older. Other LTD Assumptions IBNR Reserve: 60% of expected claim cost for year Overpayment Recovery: 65% of overpayment balance Future Payroll Growth: 4.0% long-term growth for actuarial valuation. 3.0% nearterm growth for cashflow projections. Projected Future Claim Cost as % of Payroll (used in cashflow projections): 0.31% in , which increases in future due to aging. Administrative Expenses: 4.65% of claims Estimated Offsets: Estimated approval rate of 50% to 80% for claims in first three years of disability that do not yet have Social Security offsets. Estimated offset amount of 50% of gross benefit. 17
20 Waiver Mortality and Recovery Rates Table C.2 Mortality Rates as % of 2005 SOA Group Life Waiver Table (Based on Actual KPERS Experience) Claim Duration (Months) Gender Male 100% 75% 75% 75% 75% 100% 100% Female 100% 75% 75% 75% 75% 100% 90% Table C.3 Recovery Rates as % of 2005 SOA Group Life Waiver Table (Based on Actual KPERS Experience) Attained Age Gender Under and Older Male 100% 300% Female 100% 300% Other Waiver Assumptions Benefit Indexing: Historical indexing is based on actual retirement plan calculations. Indexing for 2016 and later uses a rate of 2.0%, which is equivalent to a 3% annual assumed increase in the consumer price index, less 1.0% as specified by the plan. Projected Future Claim Cost as % of Payroll (used in cashflow projections): 0.10% in , which increases in future due to aging. IBNR: 12.5% of expected claim cost for year 18
21 Appendix D: Experience Exhibits KPERS Death and Disability Valuation Experience Exhibits as of 6/30/2015 Death Claims by Death Benefit Paid Death Benefit Paid Count % of Claims Count % of Claims 0-9, % 0 0% 10,000-19, % 7 7% 20,000-29, % 6 6% 30,000-39, % 20 20% 40,000-49, % 26 26% 50,000-59, % 12 12% 60,000-69, % 13 13% 70,000-79, % 6 6% 80,000-89, % 3 3% 90,000-99, % 3 3% 100, % 3 3% Total % % Death Claims by Age at Death Age at Death Count % of Claims Count % of Claims % 2 2% % 0 0% % 11 11% % 47 47% % 29 29% % 10 10% Total % % 19
22 Active LTD Claims by Age at Disability Age at Disability Count % of Claims Count % of Claims <20 1 0% 2 0% % 82 3% % % % % % % % 132 5% % 20 1% Total 2, % 2, % Active LTD Claims by Attained Age Attained Age Count % of Claims Count % of Claims <20 0 0% 0 0% % 5 0% % 78 3% % % ,251 50% 1,201 50% % % % 71 3% Total 2, % 2, % 20
23 Active LTD Claims by Net Benefit Amount Net Monthly Benefit Count % of Claims Count % of Claims ,080 43% 1,038 43% % % 1,000-1, % % 1,500-1, % 138 6% 2,000-2, % 54 2% 2,500-2, % 31 1% 3,000-3, % 12 0% 3,500-3, % 4 0% 4,000-4, % 1 0% 4,500-4, % 0 0% 5, % 0 0% Total 2, % 2, % Active LTD Claims by Diagnosis Diagnosis Count % of Claims Count % of Claims Back/Neck % % Cardiovascular % % Musculoskeletal % % Neurological % % Gastrointestinal 52 2% 46 2% Genitourinary 37 1% 34 1% Glandular 74 3% 63 3% Respiratory 82 3% 86 4% Aids 8 0% 6 0% Cancer 132 5% 124 5% Eyes, Ears and Nose 53 2% 50 2% Complications of Pregnancy 5 0% 5 0% Mental/Nervous % % Substance Abuse/Addiction 0 0% 0 0% Misc/Other 239 9% % Total 2, % 2, % 21
24 New LTD Claims by Age at Disability Age at Disability Count % of Claims Count % of Claims <20 0 0% 1 0% % 1 0% % 23 9% % 42 17% % % % 43 17% % 4 2% Total % % New LTD Claims by Attained Age Attained Age Count % of Claims Count % of Claims <20 0 0% 0 0% % 1 0% % 18 7% % 31 13% % % % 60 24% % 9 4% Total % % 22
25 New LTD Claims by Net Benefit Amount Net Benefit Count % of Claims Count % of Claims % % % 44 18% 1,000-1, % 48 20% 1,500-1, % 22 9% 2,000-2, % 16 7% 2,500-2, % 8 3% 3,000-3, % 5 2% 3,500-3, % 2 1% 4,000-4, % 0 0% 4,500-4, % 0 0% 5, % 0 0% Total % % New LTD Claims by Diagnosis Diagnosis Count % of Claims Count % of Claims Back/Neck 35 15% 36 15% Cardiovascular 23 10% 30 12% Musculoskeletal 48 21% 44 18% Neurological 30 13% 30 12% Gastrointestinal 5 2% 4 2% Genitourinary 3 1% 3 1% Glandular 3 1% 2 1% Respiratory 7 3% 19 8% Aids 2 1% 0 0% Cancer 28 12% 26 11% Eyes, Ears and Nose 9 4% 5 2% Complications of Pregnancy 0 0% 1 0% Mental/Nervous 22 9% 24 10% Substance Abuse/Addiction 0 0% 0 0% Misc/Other 17 7% 22 9% Total % % 23
26 Terminated LTD Claims by Term Reason Term Reason Count % of Claims Count % of Claims Death % % Recovery 88 22% 65 16% Retirement % % Expiry 45 11% 31 7% Total % % 24
27 LTD Offset Approval Rates by Attained Age Attained Age 6/30/2014 6/30/ % 80% % 71% % 80% % 89% % 94% % 90% Total 89% 89% LTD Offset Approval Rates by Claim Duration Duration of Claim 6/30/2014 6/30/ % 66% 2 76% 70% 3 88% 85% 4 92% 91% 5 94% 94% % 96% % 89% Total 89% 89% 25
28 Average LTD Offset by Attained Age Attained Age 6/30/2014 6/30/ , , , , , , , , , , , , Total 1, , Average LTD Offset by Claim Duration Duration of Claim 6/30/2014 6/30/ , , , , , , , , , , , , Total 1, ,
29 Appendix E: Gain-Loss Exhibit for Changes in the unfunded actuarial accrued liability occur for various reasons. The net decrease in the unfunded actuarial accrued liability from July 1, 2012 to July 1, 2014 was $31.5 million. The components of this net change are shown in the table below (in millions): Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability, July 1, 2012 $ Impact of new claim experience different from expected $ (29.2) Impact of terminated claim experience different from expected $ (6.6) Impact of change in assumptions* $ 4.6 Impact of new entrants (active) $ 4.1 Other liability experience and asset experience $ (4.4) Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability, July 1, 2014 $ *Beginning with the 6/30/2014 valuation, the interest rate used to discount future benefit payments has been reduced from 4.5% to 4.0%. Since the 6/30/2015 valuation is an interim valuation, this information is carried over from the prior GASB 43 valuation. 27
KPERS Death and Disability Benefit Program. Annual Report and GASB 43 Actuarial Valuation As of June 30, 2014
KPERS Death and Disability Benefit Program Annual Report and GASB 43 Actuarial Valuation As of June 30, 2014 Prepared by: Daniel D. Skwire, F.S.A., M.A.A.A Principal and Consulting Actuary Milliman, Inc.
More informationMetropolitan Transit Authority Union Pension Plan
Metropolitan Transit Authority Union Pension Plan January 1, 2017 Actuarial Valuation Prepared by: James Tumlinson, Jr. EA, MAAA Jake Pringle EA, MAAA Milliman, Inc. 500 Dallas St., Suite 2550 Houston,
More informationMetropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan
Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan January 1, 2017 Actuarial Valuation Prepared by: James Tumlinson, Jr. EA, MAAA Jake Pringle EA, MAAA Milliman, Inc. 500 Dallas Street, Suite 2550 Houston,
More informationGASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet. As of January 1, Prepared by:
GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet As of January 1, 2014 Prepared by: Nina M. Lantz, ASA, EA, MAAA Principal and Consulting Actuary William H. Clark-Shim,
More informationMarch 18, Teachers Retirement Board California State Teachers Retirement System
1301 Fifth Avenue Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98101-2605 USA Tel +1 206 624 7940 Fax +1 206 623 3485 milliman.com March 18, 2015 Teachers Retirement Board Re: Medicare Premium Payment Program Actuarial Valuation
More informationRe: Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2018 Bloomington Fire Department Relief Association Pension Fund
71 South Wacker Drive 31 st Floor Chicago, IL 60606 USA Tel +1 312 726 0677 Fax +1 312 499 5695 February 15, 2018 milliman.com 10 West 95th Street Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Re: Actuarial Valuation Report
More informationGASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet. As of January 1, Prepared by:
GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet As of January 1, 2016 Prepared by: Nina M. Lantz, FSA, EA, MAAA Principal and Consulting Actuary William H. Clark-Shim,
More informationCITY OF FORT COLLINS GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JANUARY 1, Prepared by:
ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JANUARY 1, 2005 Prepared by: Patricia Ann Kahle, F.S.A., E.A. Principal and Consulting Actuary and Joel E. Stewart, E.A. Associate Actuary May 2005 1099 Eighteenth Street, Suite
More informationGovernment of Guam Retirement Fund
Prepared by: Richard A. Wright FSA, MAAA Milliman, Inc. 650 California Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94108 Tel 415 403 1333 Fax 415 403 1334 milliman.com April 20, 2017 650 California Street,
More informationState of Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2007
State of Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2007 Prepared: October 2007 Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report Table of
More informationTeachers Pension and Annuity Fund of New Jersey. Experience Study July 1, 2006 June 30, 2009
Teachers Pension and Annuity Fund of New Jersey Experience Study July 1, 2006 June 30, 2009 by Richard L. Gordon Scott F. Porter December, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION
More informationThe Housing Authority of the City of Pharr Texas Texas County & District Retirement System GASB 75 Report
Milliman GASB 75 Report GASB 75 Report For Measurement Date: December 31, 2017 Based on Actuarial Valuation Date: December 31, 2017 For Fiscal Year Ending: September 30, 2018 Prepared by: Mark Olleman
More informationJune 5, Mr. Douglas B. Stansil Finance Director Racine County 730 Wisconsin Avenue Racine, WI 53403
15800 Bluemound Road Suite 400 Brookfield, WI 53005-6069 USA Tel +1 262 784 2250 Fax +1 262 784 7287 milliman.com June 5, 2008 Mr. Douglas B. Stansil Finance Director Racine County 730 Wisconsin Avenue
More informationP U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A
P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A LOCAL GOVERNMENT CORR E C T I O N A L S E R V I C E RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL V A L U A T I O N R E P O R T
More informationSanta Barbara County Employees Retirement System 2007 INVESTIGATION OF EXPERIENCE For the period July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2007
Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement System 2007 INVESTIGATION OF EXPERIENCE For the period July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2007 Revised January 2008 by Karen I. Steffen, FSA, EA, MAAA Fellow, Society of
More informationDear Trustees of the Local Government Correctional Service Retirement Plan:
MINNESOTA LOCAL GOVERNMENT CORRECTIONAL SERVICE RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JULY 1, 2012 November 2012 Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota St. Paul, Minnesota Dear
More informationTEACHERS PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND OF NEW JERSEY. June 30, 2017 Actuarial Valuation Report Prepared as of July 1, 2017
TEACHERS PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND OF NEW JERSEY June 30, 2017 Actuarial Valuation Report Prepared as of July 1, 2017 1550 Liberty Ridge Drive Suite 200 Wayne, PA 19087-5572 USA Tel +1 610 687.5644 Fax
More informationP U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A
P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A L O C A L G O V E R N M E N T C O R R E C T I O N A L S E R V I C E R E T I R E M E N T P L A N A C T U A R
More informationGASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT
GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT FOR THE IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM MEASUREMENT DATE: JUNE 30, 2018 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve November
More informationNovember Minnesota State Retirement System State Patrol Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors:
MINNESOTA STATE PATROL RETIREMENT FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JULY 1, 2012 November 2012 Minnesota State Retirement System St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Board of Directors: The results of the July
More informationKansas Public Employees Retirement System
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System Valuation Report as of December 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Sections Actuarial Certification Letter Page Section 1 Board Summary 1 Section 2 Scope of the Report
More informationDecember 4, Minnesota State Retirement System Legislators Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors:
MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM LEGISLATORS RETIREMENT FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JULY 1, 2013 December 4, 2013 Minnesota State Retirement System St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Board of Directors:
More informationACTUARIAL. 123 Solvency Test 124 Analysis of Financial Experience 124 Schedule of Funding Progress
CalSTRS administers retirement, disability and survivor benefits for California s 914,454 public school educators (from pre-kindergarten through community college) and their beneficiaries. Defined Benefit
More informationRe: Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2012 Bloomington Fire Department Relief Association Pension Fund
March 8, 2012 10 West 95th Street Bloomington, MN 55420 71 South Wacker Drive 31 st Floor Chicago, IL 60606 USA Tel +1 312 726 0677 Fax +1 312 499 5695 milliman.com Re: Actuarial Valuation Report as of
More informationLos Angeles County Employees Retirement Association
Milliman Actuarial Valuation Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association 2016 Investigation of Experience for Retirement Benefit Assumptions December 2016 Board Meeting Prepared by: Mark C. Olleman,
More informationLOS ANGELES COUNTY OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM ACTUARIAL VALUATION
LOS ANGELES COUNTY OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM ACTUARIAL VALUATION July 1, 2014 Prepared By: Robert L. Schmidt, FSA, EA, MAAA Fellow, Society of Actuaries Enrolled Actuary Member, American Academy
More informationFlorida Retirement System Pension Plan
Milliman Actuarial Valuation Actuarial Valuation as of July 1, 2017 Prepared by: Matt Larrabee, FSA, EA, MAAA Principal and Consulting Actuary Daniel Wade, FSA, EA, MAAA Principal and Consulting Actuary
More informationGASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT
GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT FOR THE IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM MEASUREMENT DATE: JUNE 30, 2017 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve November
More informationCorrectional Employees Retirement Fund
December 2011 Correctional Employees Retirement Fund Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2011 Contents Cover Letter Highlights... 1 Principal Valuation Results... 2 Important Notices... 4 Supplemental
More informationKansas Public Employees Retirement System
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System Valuation Report as of December 31, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Sections Actuarial Certification Letter Page Section 1 Board Summary 1 Section 2 Scope of the Report
More informationTacoma Employees Retirement System
Milliman Actuarial Valuation January 1, 2016 Actuarial Valuation Prepared by: Mark C. Olleman, FSA, EA, MAAA Consulting Actuary Daniel R. Wade, FSA, EA, MAAA Consulting Actuary Julie D. Smith, FSA, EA,
More informationCITY OF LARKSPUR Staff Report. November 19, 2014 Council Meeting. Honorable Mayor Morrison and Members of the City Council
AGENDA ITEM 7.2 CITY OF LARKSPUR Staff Report November 19, 2014 Council Meeting DATE: November 14, 2014 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor Morrison and Members of the City Council Dan Schwarz, City Manager
More informationMinnesota Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement
Milliman Client Report Minnesota Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement Replication of the Actuarial Valuation of the Minnesota State Retirement System Correctional Employees Retirement Fund
More informationP U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A
P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A GENERAL EMPLOYEES RET I R E M E N T P L A N ACTUARIAL V A L U A T I O N R E P O R T A S O F J U L Y 1, 2013
More informationP U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A L O C A L G O V E R N M E N T C O R R E C T I O N A L S
P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A L O C A L G O V E R N M E N T C O R R E C T I O N A L S E R V I C E R E T I R E M E N T P L A N G A S B S T
More informationWest Virginia Teachers Retirement System
West Virginia Teachers Retirement System Actuarial Valuation As of July 1, 2013 Prepared by: for the West Virginia Consolidated Public Retirement Board January 2014 January 15, 2014 West Virginia Consolidated
More informationLos Angeles County Employees Retirement Association. ACTUARIAL VALUATION June 30, 2003
ACTUARIAL VALUATION June 30, 2003 By Karen I. Steffen Fellow, Society of Actuaries Member, American Academy of Actuaries and Nick J. Collier Associate, Society of Actuaries Member, American Academy of
More informationGASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT
GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT FOR THE IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM PREPARED AS OF JUNE 30, 2014 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve November
More informationGASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT
GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT FOR THE KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM MEASUREMENT DATE: JUNE 30, 2017 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve October
More informationFlorida Retirement System
Florida Retirement System 2016 FRS Actuarial Assumptions Conference Including Preliminary July 1, 2016 Actuarial Valuation Results Presented by: Matt Larrabee, FSA, EA, MAAA October 11, 2016 This work
More informationNovember Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan St. Paul, Minnesota
MINNESOTA GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JULY 1, 2012 November 2012 Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Trustees of the : The
More informationActuarial Valuation Report for the Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore
Actuarial Valuation Report for the Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore as of June 30, 2015 Produced by Cheiron November 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Transmittal Letter... i Foreword...
More informationTown of Scituate Retirement Plan for the Police Department Employees
Town of Scituate Retirement Plan for the Police Department Employees Financial Disclosure Information in accordance with Statements of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 67 ( GASB 67
More informationMinnesota Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement
Milliman Client Report Minnesota Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement Replication of the Actuarial Valuation of the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota Local Government Correctional
More informationActuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, Maine Public Employees Retirement System Retiree Group Life Insurance. Presented by Cheiron
Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, 2010 Maine Public Employees Retirement System Retiree Group Life Insurance Presented by Cheiron October 2010 Table of Contents i Letter of Transmittal 2 Section
More informationWestern Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan January 1, 2017 Actuarial Valuation Prepared by: Milliman, Inc. Principal and Consulting Actuary Peter R. Sturdivan, FSA, EA, MAAA Consulting Actuaries: Grant
More informationRIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS GASB 45 ACTUARIAL VALUATION
RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS GASB 45 ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JULY 1, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 ACTUARIAL CERTIFICATION... 4 ACCOUNTING
More informationMETROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY NON-UNION PENSION PLAN
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY NON-UNION PENSION PLAN GASB 67 AND 68 DISCLOSURE Fiscal Year: October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016 Prepared by Milliman, Inc. James Tumlinson, Jr., EA, MAAA Principal and
More informationM U N I C I P A L E M P L O Y E E S A N N U I T Y A N D B E N E F I T F U N D O F C H I C A G O ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T F O R T H E Y E A R
M U N I C I P A L E M P L O Y E E S A N N U I T Y A N D B E N E F I T F U N D O F C H I C A G O ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T F O R T H E Y E A R ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2013 APRIL 2 0 1 4 April 10, 2014
More informationMilliman CITY OF NORWALK POLICE BENEFIT FUND. Actuarial Valuation as of July 1, 2014 For Fiscal Year Milliman Actuarial Valuation
Milliman CITY OF NORWALK POLICE BENEFIT FUND Actuarial Valuation as of July 1, 214 For Fiscal Year 215-216 Prepared by Rebecca A. Sielman, FSA Consulting Actuary Stephen Chykirda, ASA Actuary 8 Lamberton
More informationPUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. Actuarial Experience Study for the period July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2004.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA Actuarial Experience Study for the period July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2004 Copyright 2005 THE SEGAL GROUP, INC., THE PARENT OF THE SEGAL COMPANY ALL
More informationCITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS GENERAL OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
CITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS GENERAL OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JUNE 30, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Number -- Cover Letter EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-2 Executive Summary
More informationTeachers Retirement Association of Minnesota
Teachers Retirement Association of Minnesota Actuarial Valuation Report For Funding Purposes As of July 1, 2016 This page is intentionally left blank Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The
More informationState Teachers Retirement System of Ohio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2016
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2016 Copyright 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. 101 NORTH WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 500 CHICAGO, IL 60606
More informationFire and Police Pension Fund, San Antonio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2017
Fire and Police Pension Fund, San Antonio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2017 Copyright 2017 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. 2018 Powers Ferry Road, Suite 850 Atlanta, GA
More informationMilliman Client Report. Minnesota Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Client Report 14-0535
More informationM INNESOTA STATE PATROL RETIREMENT FUND
M INNESOTA STATE PATROL RETIREMENT FUND 4 - YEAR EXPERIENCE STUDY JULY 1, 2011 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2015 GRS Gabriel Roeder Smith & Company Consultants & Actuaries 277 Coon Rapids Blvd. Suite 212 Coon Rapids,
More informationMassachusetts Water Resources Authority
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Actuarial Valuation and Review of Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) as of This report has been prepared at the request of the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority
More informationJuly 1, 2013 POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS ANALYSIS OF CITY OF CRANSTON FIRE AND POLICE. December 4, 2013
POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS ANALYSIS OF CITY OF CRANSTON FIRE AND POLICE December 4, 2013 J:\HWConsult\Rez\Cranston, City of\2013\results\city of Cranston OPEB Report 2013.docx TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page
More informationContents. 1. Summary of Results ($000) Introduction...3 Report on the Actuarial Valuation as at July 1,
Contents 1. Summary of Results ($000)...1 2. Introduction...3 as at July 1, 2003...3 3. Financial Position of the Plan...6 Valuation Results Going-Concern Basis...6 Valuation Results Solvency Basis...7
More informationMinnesota State Retirement System. State Patrol Retirement Fund Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2017
Minnesota State Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2017 December 6, 2017 Minnesota State Retirement System St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Board of Directors: The results of the July 1,
More informationMINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND
MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JULY 1, 2015 December 14, 2015 Minnesota State Retirement System St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Board of Directors:
More informationCONTENTS. Introduction. Valuation Results. 1-2 Summary of Actuarial Valuation Results 3 Derivation of Experience Gain (Loss) 4-7 Comments and Analysis
CITY OF JOLIET FIREFI G H T E R S P E N S I O N F U N D ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALU A T I O N FOR THE YEAR BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2015 CONTENTS Section Page Introduction A Valuation Results 1-2 Summary of Actuarial
More informationFebruary 3, Experience Study Judges Retirement Fund
February 3, 2012 Experience Study 2007-2011 February 3, 2012 Minnesota State Retirement System St. Paul, MN 55103 2007 to 2011 Experience Study Dear Dave: The results of the actuarial valuation are based
More informationActuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund)
Actuarial Actuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund) April 30, 2009 Board of Trustees Texas Municipal System Austin, Texas Dear Trustees: In accordance with the Texas Municipal System ( TMRS )
More information***ADDENDUM TWO*** REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) Post Employment Benefits Other than Pensions Actuarial Valuation June 15, 2018
***ADDENDUM TWO*** REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) Post Employment Benefits Other than Pensions Actuarial Valuation June 15, 2018 The following are answers to questions received by potential proposers. 1.
More informationAlameda County Employees Retirement Association
Alameda County Employees Retirement Association GASB Statement No. 43 (OPEB) and non-opeb Actuarial Valuation of the Benefits Provided by the Supplemental Retiree, Including Sufficiency of Funds, as of
More informationThe City of Omaha Police & Fire Retirement System
The City of Omaha Police & Fire Retirement System Actuarial Valuation as of January 1, 2014 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve July 10, 2014 Board
More informationMUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN APPENDIX TO THE ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2016
MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN APPENDIX TO THE ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2016 Summary of Plan Provisions, Actuarial Assumptions and Actuarial Funding Method as
More informationNew Mexico Retiree Health Care Authority
New Mexico Retiree Health Care Authority Actuarial Valuation and Review of Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) as of June 30, 2016 In accordance with GASB Statement No. 43 This report has been prepared
More informationCounty of Sonoma. Distributed to JLMBC on December 7, 2011
County of Sonoma Actuarial Valuation and Review of Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) as of June 30, 2011 In accordance with GASB Statements No. 43 and No. 45 Copyright 2011 by The Segal Group, Inc.,
More informationSOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN. ACTUARIAL VALUATION as of October 1, 2015
SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION as of October 1, 2015 FINANCIAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURES UNDER GASB 67 and 68 as of September 30, 2015 Prepared by: KMS Actuaries,
More informationTACOMA EMPLOYES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. STUDY OF MORTALITY EXPERIENCE January 1, 2002 December 31, 2005
TACOMA EMPLOYES RETIREMENT SYSTEM STUDY OF MORTALITY EXPERIENCE January 1, 2002 December 31, 2005 by Mark C. Olleman Fellow, Society of Actuaries Member, American Academy of Actuaries taca0384.doc May
More informationNew Mexico Judicial Retirement Fund
New Mexico Judicial Retirement Fund GASB Statement No. 67 Supplemental Report Prepared as of June 30, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Item Page No. I Introduction 1 II Financial Statement Notes 3 III Required
More informationLaborers & Retirement Board and Employees Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago
Laborers & Retirement Board and Employees Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago Actuarial Valuation Report for the Year Ending December 31, 2017 May 2018 May 2, 2018 The Retirement Board of the Laborers
More informationActuarial SECTION. A Tradition of Service
Actuarial SECTION A Tradition of Service We were created by the Michigan Legislature in 1945 with one simple goal: to help municipalities offer affordable, sustainable retirement solutions for their employees.
More informationCity of Hollywood Post-Retirement Medical Actuarial Valuation As Required by GASB 45
Post-Retirement Medical Actuarial Valuation As Required by GASB 45 Fiscal Date: October 1, 2013 - September 30, 2014 October 1, 2014 - September 30, 2015 Date of Report: February 25, 2015 Prepared By:
More informationOhio Police & Fire Pension Fund Jan. 1, 2015 Actuarial Valuation of Retiree Health Care Benefits Under GASB 43
Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund Jan. 1, 2015 Actuarial Valuation of Retiree Health Care Benefits Under GASB 43 October 2015 Robert Besenhofer Director, Health and Productivity October 13, 2015 Board of
More informationActuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund)
Actuarial Actuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund) May 22, 2015 Board of Trustees Texas Municipal Retirement System ( TMRS or the System ) Austin, Texas Dear Trustees: In accordance with the
More informationActuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund)
Actuarial Actuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund) May 19, 2017 Board of Trustees Texas Municipal Retirement System ( TMRS or the System ) Austin, Texas Dear Trustees: In accordance with the
More informationTeachers Retirement Association of Minnesota
Teachers Retirement Association of Minnesota Actuarial Valuation Report For Funding Purposes As of July 1, 2017 This page is intentionally left blank Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The
More informationActon-Boxborough Regional School District and Town of Acton
Acton-Boxborough Regional School District and Town of Acton Actuarial Valuation and Review of Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) as of December 31, 2010 In Accordance with GASB Statements Number 43 and
More informationCity of Fraser Retiree Health Care Plan Actuarial Valuation Report As of June 30, 2017
City of Fraser Retiree Health Care Plan Actuarial Valuation Report As of June 30, 2017 Table of Contents Section Page Number -- Cover Letter Executive Summary 1 Executive Summary A Valuation Results 1
More informationState Teachers Retirement System of Ohio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2017
State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2017 Copyright 2017 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. 101 NORTH WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 500 CHICAGO, IL 60606
More informationS T A T E P O L I C E R E T I R E M E N T B E N E F I T S T R U S T S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D A C T U A R I A L V A L U A T I O N R E P O R
S T A T E P O L I C E R E T I R E M E N T B E N E F I T S T R U S T S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D A C T U A R I A L V A L U A T I O N R E P O R T A S O F J U N E 3 0, 2 0 0 8 September 2, 2009 Retirement
More informationNovember 28, Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan St. Paul, Minnesota
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Public Employees Retirement
More informationCity of Jacksonville General Employees Retirement Plan
City of Jacksonville General Actuarial Valuation and Review as of October 1, 2017 This report has been prepared at the request of the Board of Trustees to assist in administering the Plan. This valuation
More informationPostemployment Benefits Other Than Pension Actuarial Valuation July 1, September 2008
Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pension Actuarial Valuation July 1, 2007 September 2008 Submitted by: Aon Consulting 270 Davidson Avenue Somerset, NJ 08873 Mr. Frederick J. Beaver Director State of
More informationA R K A N S A S P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M ( I N C L U D I N G D I S T R I C T J U D G E S
A R K A N S A S P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M ( I N C L U D I N G D I S T R I C T J U D G E S ) G A S B S T A T E M E N T N O S. 6 7 A N D 6 8 A C C O U N T I N G A N D
More informationEl Paso County Retirement Plan
Conduent HR Consulting, LLC El Paso County Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation Report Prepared as of January 1, 2018 May 2018 May 24, 2018 Board of Retirement El Paso County Retirement Plan 105 E. Vermijo,
More informationMISSOURI STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM - JUDGES
MISSOURI STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM - JUDGES 5 - YEAR EXPERIENCE STUDY JULY 1, 2010 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2015 ACTUARIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT 2010-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Overview and Economic Assumptions
More informationS TAT E U NIVERSITIES R E T I REMENT SYSTEM OF I L L INOIS
S TAT E U NIVERSITIES R E T I REMENT SYSTEM OF I L L INOIS G A S B S T A T E M E N T N O. 6 7 P L A N R E P O R T I N G A N D A C C O U N T I N G S C H E D U L E S J U N E 3 0, 2 0 1 4 October 10, 2014
More informationTeachers Retirement Association of Minnesota
Teachers Retirement Association of Minnesota Actuarial Valuation Report For Funding Purposes As of July 1, 2018 This page is intentionally left blank Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The
More informationCity of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Actuarial Valuation and Review of Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) as of June 30, 2017 In accordance with GASB Statement No. 45 This report has been
More informationSTATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ILLINOIS
STATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ILLINOIS GASB STATEMENT NOS. 67 AND 68 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS JUNE 30, 2015 November 12, 2015 The Board of Trustees State Universities Retirement
More informationEmployees' Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth Revised Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2014
Employees' Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth Revised Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2014 Copyright 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. 2018 Powers Ferry Road, Suite
More informationGASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT
GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT FOR THE TEACHERS RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA FOR ACCOUNTING PURPOSES PREPARED AS OF JUNE 30, 2015 Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and
More informationC ITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS GENERAL OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
C ITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS GENERAL OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JUNE 30, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Number -- Cover Letter EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-2 Executive Summary
More informationKPERS 1 KPERS 2 Correctional KPERS 1 Correctional KPERS 2. Guide. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System KPERS
KPERS 1 KPERS 2 Correctional KPERS 1 Correctional KPERS 2 Guide Kansas Public Employees Retirement System KPERS Welcome to the Retirement System Welcome to the Kansas Public Employees Retirement System.
More informationChicago Transit Authority Supplemental Retirement Plan And Retirement Plan for Board Members. Actuarial Valuation As of January 1, 2003
Chicago Transit Authority Supplemental Retirement Plan And Retirement Plan for Board Members Actuarial Valuation As of January 1, 2003 June 17, 2003 Ms. Lynn Sapyta Comptroller/General Manager, Finance
More information