Chapter 6: Analysis of control
|
|
- Kathleen Hutchinson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chapter 6: Analysis of control 6.1. Introduction The preceding Chapter dealt with the manner in which the relevant risks are analysed for the functional activities distinguished within the organisational structure. More specifically, it discussed the assessment of (default scores for) the probability of a risk event within a certain functional activity leading to a significant to high impact. This Chapter deals with the next stage of the supervisory method: the analysis of the quality of the risk controls within the institution. Analysis of the risks controls serves to gain an insight into the quality of the risk controls for the individual risks and into the resulting residual risks within the functional activities that have been distinguished in the breakdown of the organisation. In the absence of adequate controls, there is an enhanced probability of the risk giving rise to a risk event or leading to a heavier impact Inherent risks, controls and residual risks With the aid of controls, an institution is able to reduce its risks. These measures do not affect the level of the inherent risk but reduce the institution s residual risk position. The residual risk position results after allowing for the effects of all existing controls: INHERENT RISKS mitigated by CONTROLS = RESIDUAL RISKS It should be noted that inherent risks cannot be reduced to nil, not even with the aid of adequate controls. Phrased differently, even if optimum controls are in place, a residual risk remains in most cases. For some risks, this ultimately resulting residual risk will be larger than for other risks. The supervisor s assessment focuses on the question whether the institution controls the risk concerned in an optimum manner (as best as is realistically feasible). The question whether the risk is thus eliminated in full is of secondary importance. The illustration below shows a visual representation of this argument. The hatched parts represent the proportion of the risk that remains even after optimum control. In this example, for instance, the market risk cannot be reduced to nil. The blue part represents the difference between optimum and actually present controls. Within FIRM, optimum control of a certain risk, irrespective of the question whether the risk has been reduced to nil, should lead to the assessment strong control (control score 1). In the illustration, control score 1 is assigned if B equals C. The fact that in many cases risks cannot be controlled completely is reflected in the residual risk calculated by FIRM. Thus, optimum risk-specific control (score 1) for high inherent risks never leads to a residual risk score of 1 within FIRM. Chapter 6: Analysis of control Page 1 of 13
2 The following may serve to illustrate this point. Even in the case of optimum control (score 1), a risk where the inherent risk has been assessed as high (score 4) or material (score 3) will at most lead to a residual risk score of 2.5 or 2, respectively. For information on the manner in which the controls affect the level of risks, the reader is referred to Chapter 7 (Aggregation). This Chapter focuses on the risk controls. Below, guidelines are presented for assessing institutions control frameworks Control categories Within FIRM, the following forms of control (control categories) are distinguished: risk-specific controls; risk-transcending controls (organisation and management); risk-mitigating action of group functions. In addition, two special control categories are distinguished, namely Solvency Management and Liquidity Management, which are discussed below. For each control category, an overview is presented below of the underlying control items, the aspects that govern control quality, and aspects that merit attention when assessing controls. It is emphasised that the overview is not exhaustive and should merely be seen as providing general guidelines. Using his/her professional judgment, the supervisor must decide which (other) aspects are relevant to the assessment Analysis of risk-specific controls Introduction Risk-specific controls comprise controls that are specifically aimed at mitigating one single risk category. Thus, collection procedures are aimed specifically at reducing credit risk. Likewise, disaster recovery and back-up procedures are aimed specifically at reducing IT risk. Chapter 6: Analysis of control Page 2 of 13
3 Such risk-specific controls generally seek to reduce the probability of a risk event or, in the case of a risk event, to reduce its impact. 1 Aspects of risk-specific controls Within FIRM, the risk-specific controls for all risk categories consist of the same four underlying control items, namely: Control item Risk identification Risk policy AO/IC Risk monitoring Description The degree to which and the manner in which the institution has independently mapped the specific risk category, through such means as a risk inventory and risk analysis. The quality of the written policy with regard to the degree to which (risk appetite) and the manner in which (outline of controls to be implemented) the institution plans to control the risk category concerned. The degree to which and the manner in which procedures, function segregations, authorisations, limits and other preventive measures or other measures have been implemented in order to control the risk category concerned and thus to implement the appurtenant risk policy. The degree to which and the manner in which the specific risk is monitored (and required adjustments are made) and the controls have been implemented, for instance by means of performance, incident or exception reports and analyses. When assessing the controls, use may be made of the assessment criteria where, for each individual risk category, an overview is presented of possible risk-specific controls. For this overview, where the above control items have been elaborated for each individual risk category, the reader is referred to Annex D. Scoring of risk-specific controls The quality of the risk-specific controls is scored separately for each individual risk category for which the inherent risks were assessed in the previous stage. Hence, if several risk categories have been scored within a single functional activity, the supervisor must also make a separate assessment for each risk category of the quality of the risk-specific controls aimed at these individual risk categories. In section (Simplified versus comprehensive scoring of control) an explanation is given of the manner of assigning scores in the case of comprehensive scoring Analysis of risk-transcending controls Organisation Introduction The control category Organisation may exert a risk-mitigating effect on inherent risks through such means as a transparent organisational structure, clear links between activities, management units and group functions, and through an adequate reporting structure. 1 Despite the fact that within FIRM only the probability of a risk event is estimated, the assessment of controls also makes allowance for both probability-reducing measures and impact-reducing measures (to the extent that a distinction can be made between the two). Chapter 6: Analysis of control Page 3 of 13
4 Organisation is a non-risk-specific control, also known as a risk-transcending control. This means that the aspects of Organisation do not relate to a single risk, but have a risk-mitigating effect on the entire functional activity and the risks distinguished in that activity. Aspects of Organisation The control category Organisation is subdivided into the following control items: Control item Organisational structure Supply of management information Human resources Internal cooperation and communication Audit measures Description The transparency of the legal or organisational structure, and the extent to which it lends itself to promoting effective operations. The extent to which timely and reliable financial and operational information is available to responsible staff (including management) permitting them to make timely and well-informed decisions and, where necessary, make timely adjustments. The extent to which adequate HR policies and sound HR instruments are in place, and the qualitative and quantitative adequacy of staff. The extent to which the internal communication and cooperation among departments and business units and with group functions operates, aimed at effective cooperation in the pursuit of the objectives. The extent to which internal and external audits by auditors and actuaries contribute effectively to the identification, analysis, control, monitoring and reporting of risks. When assessing the controls, use may be made of the assessment criteria where, for each item from the control category Organisation, an overview is presented of possible aspects of such controls. For this overview, the reader is referred to the Annexes. Scoring of control category Organisation The control category Organisation is assessed at the functional activity level. This means that, within each functional activity (including all group functions), the category Organisation is assessed once. Depending on the choice made to subject this control category to simplified or comprehensive scoring 2, the assessment is made at category level or item level, respectively. At the management unit level, no assessment is made of the control category Organisation. The fact is that the score at that level is determined by the scores for the underlying functional activities and group functions. An exception is made for the assessment of the control category Organisation for the institution as a whole; this category may be assessed by way of the group function Corporate Governance (see section 3.2.4). 2 The choice between the two scoring methods may be made separately for each individual risk and control category. Hence, the supervisor may decide to use comprehensive scoring for some risk categories and simplified scoring for other risk or control categories. Chapter 6: Analysis of control Page 4 of 13
5 Note The analysis of the control category Organisation is of special importance when assessing controls for processes and risks that involve several departments. Thus, a complex financial transaction may require expertise in the areas of corporate finance, taxes, legislation, equities and fixed-rate instruments. Good relations facilitate cooperation in such cases. Hence, the organisational aspect merits special attention when assessing activities involving several disciplines Analysis of risk-transcending controls Management Introduction The control category Management may exert a risk-mitigating effect on inherent risks through such means as a management structure and composition matching the size and complexity of the operations, an effective decision-making process, effective strategic planning and the encouragement of a corporate culture marked by an awareness of risks and the need for risk control. Like Organisation, Management is a non-risk-specific control, also known as a risk-transcending control. This means that the aspects of Management do not relate to a single risk, but have a riskmitigating effect on the entire functional activity and the risks distinguished in that activity. Chapter 6: Analysis of control Page 5 of 13
6 Aspects of Management The control category Management is subdivided into the following control items: Control item Management quality and structure Strategy Risk/control attitude Management and decisionmaking Description The manner in which the institution s leadership function is effectively performed. Cases in point are: the competence of the (board of ) management as a whole to manage the institution; the extent to which the (board of) management is adequately balanced in terms of expertise and background; the extent to which the management structure and composition match the size and complexity of the operations; the extent to which responsibilities have been assigned in an adequate manner to the individual members of the (board of) management and the extent to which an adequate span of control has been realised; the extent to which the (board of) management sets an example for the institution s staff (for instance, by propagating ethical norms and standards); the (board of) management s leadership style and the extent to which the (board of) management is respected within the institution. This concerns: the manner in which the strategy is formulated within the institution; the extent to which this process takes place on an institution-wide basis; the transparency of the process; the substance and consistency of the strategy; the degree of specificity of the strategy, and the extent to which the institution s strategy is cle arly and consistently communicated. This concerns: the extent to which the (board of) management is aware of and interested in, and has an insight into, the risks to which the institution is exposed; the preparedness of the (board of) management to use adequate controls (both in-house and underlain by statutory rules) and to make sufficient funds available for that purpose; the extent to which the (board of) management is prepared to take risks and, when doing so, perform an adequate risk-benefit analysis; the extent to which the (board of) management complies with the existing internal controls. The extent to which the (board of) management is sufficiently actively and substantively involved in operational management and results. This is reflected in such aspects as the frequency, degree of substantiveness, intensity and action-oriented nature of management consultations. This also concerns the effectiveness of the delegation of powers to (decision-making) bodies (such as risk committees). Chapter 6: Analysis of control Page 6 of 13
7 When assessing the controls, use may be made of the assessment criteria where, for each item from the control category Management, an overview is presented of possible aspects of such controls. For this overview, the reader is referred to the Annexes. Scoring of control category Management The control category Management is assessed at the functional activity level. This means that, within each functional activity (including all group functions), the category Management is assessed. Depending on the choice made to subject this control category to simplified or comprehensive scoring, the assessment is made at category level or item level, respectively. At the management unit level, no assessment is made of the control category Management. The fact is that the score at that level is determined by the scores for the underlying functional activities and group functions. An exception is made for the assessment of the control category Management for the institution as a whole; this category may be assessed by way of the group function Corporate Governance (see section 3.2.4) Control categories Solvency Management and Liquidity Management Introduction In addition to the control categories discussed above, there are two special control categories, namely Solvency Management (except for trust offices, money transaction offices, casinos and credit card companies) and Liquidity Management (for banks only). With the aid of these categories, the supervisor assesses the quality of the manner in which the institution monitors and controls its solvency position and liquidity position, respectively. This assessment adds to the overall picture of the institution s risk management, with the assessment of the level and the control of the individual risk categories being complemented with an insight into the manner in which the institution manages its financial buffers (which, after all, serve to absorb risks, both at the present time and in the future) in the longer term. This assessment is in line with developments within the framework of Basel II, economic capital, the Financial Assessment Framework and Solvency II. This assessment of the quality of solvency and liquidity management may be viewed in conjunction with the key indicators regarding the solvency and liquidity position which are entered on the main screen of a management unit which at the same time is an institution subject to direct supervision. Chapter 6: Analysis of control Page 7 of 13
8 Solvency Management Aspects of Solvency Management The control category Solvency Management is subdivided into the following control items: Control item Policy Risk modelling Capital analysis Access to funding Description The extent to which policies are in place in respect of: the desired solvency level (calculation, amount and composition); the desired solvency level in relation to the statutory requirements and to a desired external rating or to internal ratios. For pension funds, this also includes the policy regarding the use of instruments (indexation policy, premium policy, investment policy) to make up for (imminent) solvency shortages. The extent to which and the manner in which risks are adequately modelled, aimed at the calculation of a risk-based capital need or capital requirement (economic capital). This also includes the use of adequate scenarios (including stress testing) in respect of these risks, as well as adequate and realistic assumptions and starting-points. The manner in which the institution maps the future development of its assets and liabilities in a forward-looking way, based on its long-term plans ands budgets (or more specifically, its expectations and objectives regarding (dis)investments, financing, growth of turnover, profitability, etc.), aimed at estimating the expected development of the actual solvency position. Also, the manner in which and the extent to which the development of the actual relative to the desired/required solvency position (both at the present time and in respect of expectations for the future) is adequately monitored, any relevant signals being identified/transmitted to the proper echelon in good time and, where necessary, followed up by timely action. The manner in which the institution intends to react to (imminent) solvency shortages (contingency planning) and the extent to which, if necessary, it is possible, on acceptable terms, to avert or make up for (imminent) solvency shortages through such means as: obtaining long-term funding (raising capital, such as a subordinated loan from a sponsor of a pension fund); tapping sources of income; securitising assets. When assessing the controls, use may be made of the assessment criteria where, for each item from the control category Solvency Management, an overview is presented of possible aspects of such controls. For this overview, the reader is referred to the Annexes. Chapter 6: Analysis of control Page 8 of 13
9 Scoring of control category Solvency Management Within institutions that consist of just a single functional activity, solvency management is, of course, assessed within that single functional activity as an additional control category alongside Management and Organisation. Within institutions that consist of several management units and functional activities, solvency management is always assessed within a group function Solvency Management. Within this group function, the control category Solvency Management is scored as well as the control categories Management and Organisation (specifically relating to solvency management). For the position of this group function within the tree structure, the reader is referred to Chapter 3 (Breakdown of the organisation). In either case, the manner of assessing the control category Solvency Management does not differ from that in which Management and Organisation are assessed, except that the underlying items are different Liquidity Management (for banks only) Aspects of Liquidity Management The control category Liquidity Management is subdivided into the following control items: Control item Policy Modelling Position monitoring Crisis management Access to money market Description The extent to which policies are in place in respect of: the desired liquidity level (amount and composition); the desired liquidity level in relation to the statutory requirements; the manner in which the institution intends to react to (imminent) liquidity shortages (contingency planning). The extent to which and the manner in which: risks are adequately modelled; adequate scenarios (including stress testing) in respect of these risks are in place; adequate and realistic assumptions and starting-points are used to calculate the liquidity needs, as well as to analyse these liquidity needs in the light of actual liquidity. The manner in which and the extent to which the development of the actual relative to the desired/required liquidity position (both at the present time and in respect of expectations for the future) is adequately monitored, any relevant signals being identified/transmitted to the proper echelon in good time and, where necessary, followed up by timely action. The extent to which adequate measures are in place that enter into operation in the event of (imminent) liquidity shortages. The extent to which it is possible for the institution, where necessary, to raise short-term funds rapidly and on acceptable terms in order to meet the regular liquidity needs or to be able to adjust actual liquidity levels. When assessing the controls, use may be made of the assessment criteria where, for each item from the control category Liquidity Management, an overview is presented of possible aspects of such controls. For this overview, the reader is referred to the Annexes. Chapter 6: Analysis of control Page 9 of 13
10 Scoring of control category Liquidity Management Within institutions that consist of just a single functional activity, liquidity management is, of course, assessed within that single functional activity as an additional control category alongside Management and Organisation. Within institutions that consist of several functional activities, liquidity management is always assessed within a group function Liquidity Management. Within this group function, the control category Liquidity Management is scored as well as the control categories Management and Organisation (specifically relating to liquidity management). For the position of this group function within the tree structure, the reader is referred to Chapter 3 (Breakdown of the organisation). In either case, the manner of assessing the control category Liquidity Management does not differ from that in which Management and Organisation are assessed, except that the underlying items are different Where does FIRM show the scores for Solvency Management and Liquidity Management? On the dashboard for each individual management unit which is at the same time a licensee (as well as for the institution at the highest level), a score for solvency management and a score for liquidity management (for banks only) are shown. These scores are derived from the group functions Solvency Management and Liquidity Management which have been created within the management unit concerned or from the group functions elsewhere in the tree structure which, at an earlier stage within FIRM, have been linked to the management unit concerned which is at the same time a licensee Risk-mitigating action of group functions Group functions general Group functions support functional activities and often contribute to control. As group functions usually do not perform risk-generating operations, the only score which is, in principle, assigned within group functions concerns control. Hence, the control categories Management and Organisation are automatically included in the template for the group functions. The assessment is conducted in the manner described in the preceding sections. There is no difference between the assessment of Management and Organisation for a group function and their assessment for a regular functional activity. However, for group functions which contribute specifically to the mitigation of a single specific risk category, the template (as assigned in step 3 in the breakdown of the organisation) does contain one risk category in addition to the control categories Management and Organisation. This permits the riskspecific control of this specific risk category to be scored within this group function as well. 3 Group functions are only relevant for institutions which consist of more than one functional activity. Chapter 6: Analysis of control Page 10 of 13
11 In most cases, the default score for this risk category has thus been set in the template at N/A. For further details, the reader is referred to section Group functions Solvency Management and Liquidity Management In addition to the group functions described in the preceding sections, there are two special group functions, as already indicated above: Solvency Management (except for trust offices and money transaction offices) and Liquidity Management (for banks only). These two are special in that: in addition to the control categories Management and Organisation, these group functions include a third control category, namely Solvency Management and/or Liquidity Management; The scores for these group functions are not aggregated within the organisational structure in the normal way, but are shown directly and separate ly on the FIRM dashboard. For further details, the reader is referred to the preceding sections Assigning scores for control quality Scale for assigning scores The control quality is assessed using a four-point scale, expressing decreasing effectiveness of risk mitigation: 1. Strong control: High control quality makes for a strong reduction of inherent risks. The control framework is fully in line with the requirements set by the nature of the business. 2. Adequate control: Adequate control quality makes for an adequate reduction of inherent risks. The control framework is adequately in line with the requirements set by the nature of the business. 3. Inadequate control: Control must be improved. Inherent risks are not adequately reduced. The control framework is insufficiently in line with the requirements set by the nature of the business. 4. Weak control: Control must be improved drastically and/or immediately. Inherent risks are not or barely reduced. The control framework is barely in line with the requirements set by the nature of the business. Unknown: If the supervisor has as yet insufficient information about a certain form of control, he/she should use this option. Chapter 6: Analysis of control Page 11 of 13
12 If, within a functional activity, a certain control item does not exist (for instance, because no risk policy is in place), the supervisor must score this as a weak form of control (score 4). In order to provide guidance to the supervisor in decisions on assigning scores, the Annexes to this Manual include assessment criteria for each individual control category; these assessment criteria provide indications of situations where scores of 1, 2, 3 or 4 for control quality would be appropriate. Situations may arise where actual conditions within an institution do not match one of the profiles of assessment criteria, since not all assessment criteria are relevant for each individual institution. In addition, the overview is not exhaustive. Also, circumstances may arise within an institution that cannot be related to the assessment criteria for the risk concerned but that are yet relevant for assessing the quality of control. Moreover, within an individual institution, certain assessment criteria may carry a higher weight than others. In such cases, the supervisor should use his/her professional judgment in deciding which score best matches the quality of control within the functional activity concerned. As the analysis of risks and controls serves, among other purposes, to provide input for the supervisory planning and prioritisation process, an adequate distribution of scores across the full scale is desirable. Hence, supervisors are encouraged to be explicit when assigning scores and, where possible, to use the full scale Explanation of scores assigned for control The scores assigned for control are recorded within FIRM. However, it is not just the score itself that is important; equally important are the reasons and backgrounds underlying the score assigned. FIRM offers a text field where this background information may be recorded. This information should include an indication of how up to date the sources are on which the assessment has been based. In addition, within FIRM, a link can be established with a document in Trim/Rondo Simplified versus comprehensive scoring of control The control categories are, in principle, assessed on the basis of simplified scoring. In the same way as in the assessment of the probability of inherent risk events, this leads to an assessment at the level of the individual control category. In other words: In the case of simplified scoring of the categories Management and Organisation, one score is assigned within each functional activity to the control form Management and one score to the control form Organisation. If the supervisor opts to subject the control form Management and/or Organisation to comprehensive scoring, scores are assigned to all underlying control items within Management and/or Organisation. In the case of simplified scoring of the risk-specific controls, one score is assigned within each risk category to the control form risk-specific control. In the case of comprehensive scoring, four scores are assigned within each risk category to risk-specific control. Chapter 6: Analysis of control Page 12 of 13
13 This is elaborated below for market risk: Market risk Inherent risk Score for inherent risk for probability of risk event for item price volatility Score for inherent risk for probability of risk event for item market liquidity Score for inherent risk for probability of risk event for item concentration/correlation Risk-specific control Score for quality of risk inventory aimed specifically at market risk Score for quality of risk policy aimed specifically at market risk Score for quality of AO/IC aimed specifically at market risk Score for quality of risk monitoring aimed specifically at market risk If the supervisor opts for comprehensive risk analysis for a certain risk category, this choice also automatically applies to the risk-specific controls for the risk category concerned. For each individual risk category, a separate choice may be made. Chapter 6: Analysis of control Page 13 of 13
Chapter 2: Introduction to FIRM
Chapter 2: Introduction to FIRM 2.1. Introduction This Chapter deals with the whys and wherefores of risk analysis. In that context, a look is taken at the objectives of the institutions subject to DNB
More informationIOPS Toolkit for Risk-Based Pensions Supervision Netherlands
0 Risk-based Pensions Supervision provides a structured approach focusing on identifying potential risks faced by pension funds and assessing the financial and operational factors in place to mitigate
More informationReport on Internal Control
Annex to letter from the General Secretary of the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel to the Director General of the French Association of Credit Institutions and Investment Firms Report on Internal Control
More informationBasel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Pillar 2 (Supervisory Review Process)
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consultative Document Pillar 2 (Supervisory Review Process) Supporting Document to the New Basel Capital Accord Issued for comment by 31 May 2001 January 2001 Table
More informationSOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT EUROLIFE LTD
SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT EUROLIFE LTD FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 DECEMBER 2016 1 Table of Contents 1.Executive Summary... 5 1.1 Overview... 5 1.2 Business and performance... 5 1.3 System of
More informationJanuary CNB opinion on Commission consultation document on Solvency II implementing measures
NA PŘÍKOPĚ 28 115 03 PRAHA 1 CZECH REPUBLIC January 2011 CNB opinion on Commission consultation document on Solvency II implementing measures General observations We generally agree with the Commission
More informationINTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS GUIDELINE. Nepal Rastra Bank Bank Supervision Department. August 2012 (updated July 2013)
INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS GUIDELINE Nepal Rastra Bank Bank Supervision Department August 2012 (updated July 2013) Table of Contents Page No. 1. Introduction 1 2. Internal Capital Adequacy
More informationPillar 3 Disclosure. Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (Thai) Public Company Limited. March 31 st, Pillar 3 Disclosures 31 March 2018
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (Thai) Public Company Limited Pillar 3 Disclosure March 31 st, 2018 Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (Thai) Public Company Limited 1 Contents 1. Scope of Application... 3 2. Capital...
More informationCorporate Governance of Federally-Regulated Financial Institutions
Draft Guideline Subject: -Regulated Financial Institutions Category: Sound Business and Financial Practices Date: I. Purpose and Scope of the Guideline The purpose of this guideline is to set OSFI s expectations
More informationBasel II Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Process. Simon Topping Hong Kong Monetary Authority
1 Basel II Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Process Simon Topping Hong Kong Monetary Authority 2 Outline of Presentation Rationale for Pillar 2 Key principles Banks internal capital adequacy assessment process
More informationPillar 2 - Supervisory Review Process
B ASEL II F RAMEWORK The Supervisory Review Process (Pillar 2) Rules and Guidelines Revised: February 2018 CAYMAN ISLANDS MONETARY AUTHORITY Cayman Islands Monetary Authority Page 1 Table of Contents Introduction...
More informationGUIDELINES FOR THE INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR LICENSEES
SUPERVISORY AND REGULATORY GUIDELINES: 2016 Issued: 2 August 2016 GUIDELINES FOR THE INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR LICENSEES 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Central Bank of The Bahamas ( the
More informationSOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT EUROLIFE LTD
SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT EUROLIFE LTD FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 DECEMBER 2017 1 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary... 5 1.1 Overview... 5 1.2 Business and performance... 5 1.3 System of
More informationCommittee on Payments and Market Infrastructures. Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions
Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions Recovery of financial market infrastructures October 2014 (Revised July 2017) This publication
More informationOECD GUIDELINES ON INSURER GOVERNANCE
OECD GUIDELINES ON INSURER GOVERNANCE Edition 2017 OECD Guidelines on Insurer Governance 2017 Edition FOREWORD Foreword As financial institutions whose business is the acceptance and management of risk,
More information31 December Guidelines to Article 122a of the Capital Requirements Directive
31 December 2010 Guidelines to Article 122a of the Capital Requirements Directive 1 Table of contents Table of contents...2 Background...4 Objectives and methodology...4 Implementation date...5 Considerations
More informationPrudential Standard GOI 3 Risk Management and Internal Controls for Insurers
Prudential Standard GOI 3 Risk Management and Internal Controls for Insurers Objectives and Key Requirements of this Prudential Standard Effective risk management is fundamental to the prudent management
More informationREGULATION. on Internal Governance Arrangements, the Management body and the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process for Banks and Savings banks
Pursuant to point 1 of Article 58 and points 1, 2 and 3 of Article 135 of the Banking Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 25/15; hereinafter: the ZBan-2) and the second paragraph of
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
Guidance Paper No. 2.2.x INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS GUIDANCE PAPER ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT FOR CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND SOLVENCY PURPOSES DRAFT, MARCH 2008 This document was prepared
More informationGuidance on the Approval and Supervision of Special Purpose Vehicles under Solvency II
2018 Guidance on the Approval and Supervision of Special Purpose Vehicles under Solvency II 1 Contents 1 Introduction... 3 2. Guidance... 5 2.1 General expectations of the Central Bank in relation to SII
More informationDraft Guideline. Corporate Governance. Category: Sound Business and Financial Practices. I. Purpose and Scope of the Guideline. Date: November 2017
Draft Guideline Subject: Category: Sound Business and Financial Practices Date: November 2017 I. Purpose and Scope of the Guideline This guideline communicates OSFI s expectations with respect to corporate
More informationSTRESS TESTING GUIDELINE
c DRAFT STRESS TESTING GUIDELINE November 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preamble... 2 Introduction... 3 Coming into effect and updating... 6 1. Stress testing... 7 A. Concept... 7 B. Approaches underlying stress
More informationChina International Capital Corporation (UK) Limited Pillar 3 Disclosure In respect of Financial Year Ended 31 December 2016
Pillar 3 Disclosure December 2016 China International Capital Corporation (UK) Limited Pillar 3 Disclosure In respect of Financial Year Ended 31 December 2016 1. Overview Capital Requirements Regulation
More informationICP 7 Corporate Governance. Yoshi Kawai, Secretary General ASSAL, April 2015
ICP 7 Corporate Governance Yoshi Kawai, Secretary General ASSAL, April 2015 Corporate Governance Refers to systems (such as strategies, policies, processes and controls) through which an entity is managed
More informationGL ON COMMON PROCEDURES AND METHODOLOGIES FOR SREP EBA/CP/2014/14. 7 July Consultation Paper
EBA/CP/2014/14 7 July 2014 Consultation Paper Draft Guidelines for common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process under Article 107 (3) of Directive 2013/36/EU Contents
More informationTD BANK INTERNATIONAL S.A.
TD BANK INTERNATIONAL S.A. Pillar 3 Disclosures Year Ended October 31, 2013 1 Contents 1. Overview... 3 1.1 Purpose...3 1.2 Frequency and Location...3 2. Governance and Risk Management Framework... 4 2.1
More informationCAPTIVE BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES
CAPTIVE BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES Version 01:01/11 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. General Governance Requirements... 4 3. Risk Management System... 5 4. Actuarial Function... 7 5. Outsourcing...
More informationOrdinance No. 7. Chapter One General Provisions. Chapter Two Requirements and Criteria for Organisaiton and Risk Management
1 Ordinance No. 7 of 24 April 2014 on organisation and risk management of banks (Adopted by the Bulgarian National Bank, published in the Darjaven Vestnik, issue 40 of 13 May 2014) Chapter One General
More informationEIOPA's Supervisory Statement. Solvency II: Solvency and Financial Condition Report
EIOPA-BoS/17-310 18 December 2017 EIOPA's Supervisory Statement Solvency II: Solvency and Financial Condition Report EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt Germany - Tel. + 49 69-951119-20;
More informationPosition Paper. The Role of the Actuary in Solvency II: Managing Financial Risks
Position Paper The Role of the Actuary in Solvency II: Managing Financial Risks Working Group on the Roadmap to Solvency II, Dutch Actuarial Association Utrecht, June 8, 2011 This document has been drawn
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
Guidance Paper No. 2.2.6 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS GUIDANCE PAPER ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT FOR CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND SOLVENCY PURPOSES OCTOBER 2007 This document was prepared
More informationSampo Group Risk Management Principles. 9 May 2018
Sampo Group Risk Management Principles 9 May 2018 Table of contents 1. The Objectives, Tasks and Motivation of the Risk Management Process 4 2. General Group Level Risk Statements 7 2.1 Risk Appetite 7
More informationREGULATION ON CREDIT INSTITUTION RISK MANAGEMENT
REGULATION ON CREDIT INSTITUTION RISK MANAGEMENT (Kreditinstitute-Risikomanagementverordnung KI-RMV) Full title Regulation of the Financial Market Authority (FMA) on the proper capture, management, monitoring
More informationPillar III Disclosure Report 2017
Pillar III Disclosure Report 2017 Content Section 1. Introduction and basis for preparation 3 Section 2. Risk management objectives and policies 5 Section 3. Information on the scope of application of
More informationManaging liquidity risk in a changed and global world
Managing liquidity risk in a changed and global world September 15 th, 2010 PwC Agenda 1) Introduction to Liquidity Risk and Monetary Policy 2) Liquidity Risk from a supranational regulatory perspective
More informationThe Society of Actuaries in Ireland. Actuarial Standard of Practice INS-1, Actuarial Function Report
The Society of Actuaries in Ireland Actuarial Standard of Practice INS-1, Actuarial Function Report Classification Mandatory MEMBERS ARE REMINDED THAT THEY MUST ALWAYS COMPLY WITH THE CODE OF PROFESSIONAL
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT REPORT (for the Financial Year Ended 31 March 2014)
RISK MANAGEMENT REPORT (for the Financial Year Ended 31 March 2014) Management Philosophy In essence, the Group s risk management philosophy is to uphold a strong risk management culture that will enable
More informationCIRCULAR CSSF 13/563
COMMISSION de SURVEILLANCE du SECTEUR FINANCIER In case of discrepancies between the French and the English text, the French text shall prevail Luxembourg, 19 March 2013 To all credit institutions, investment
More informationBERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY GUIDELINES ON STRESS TESTING FOR THE BERMUDA BANKING SECTOR
GUIDELINES ON STRESS TESTING FOR THE BERMUDA BANKING SECTOR TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...2 2. GUIDANCE ON STRESS TESTING AND SCENARIO ANALYSIS...3 3. RISK APPETITE...6 4. MANAGEMENT ACTION...6
More informationTESCO PERSONAL FINANCE GROUP LTD PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES FOR THE YEAR ENDED 28 FEBRUARY 2017
PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES FOR THE YEAR ENDED 28 FEBRUARY 2017 1 CONTENTS: 1. Introduction and Basel Framework 4 2. Disclosure Policy 5 2.1 Frequency of Disclosure 5 2.2 Verification and Medium 5 2.3 Use of
More informationReport to G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors on International Accounting Standards
Report to G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors on International Accounting Standards Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Basel April 2000 Table of Contents Executive Summary...1 I. Introduction...4
More informationGuiding Principles EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION OF FINANCIAL COOPERATIVE INSTITUTIONS. Pillar I Pillar II Pillar III Pillar IV
Guiding Principles EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION OF FINANCIAL COOPERATIVE INSTITUTIONS These 23 Guiding Principles (GPs) are recommended by the International Credit Union Regulators Network (ICURN) as a framework
More informationTemplate for comments
Template for comments ECB Guide to the internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (ILAAP) Institution/Company German Banking Industry Committee (GBIC) Contact person Mr/Ms Mr First name Leon Surname
More informationBasel Committee on Banking Supervision. Liquidity coverage ratio disclosure standards
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Liquidity coverage ratio disclosure standards January 2014 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). Bank for International Settlements 2014.
More informationUNITED NATIONS JOINT STAFF PENSION FUND. Enterprise-wide Risk Management Policy
UNITED NATIONS JOINT STAFF PENSION FUND Enterprise-wide Risk Management Policy 15 April 2016 Page 1 Table of Contents Page Preface I. Introduction 3 II. Definition 4 III. UNSJFP Enterprise-wide Risk Management
More informationGuidance Note: Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) Credit Unions with Total Assets Greater than $1 Billion.
Guidance Note: Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) Credit Unions with Total Assets Greater than $1 Billion January 2018 Ce document est aussi disponible en français. Applicability This
More informationRESERVE BANK OF MALAWI
RESERVE BANK OF MALAWI GUIDELINES ON INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS (ICAAP) Bank Supervision Department March 2013 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 2.0 MANDATE... 2 3.0 RATIONALE...
More informationHSBC Bank Australia Ltd. Pillar 3 Disclosures. 31 December Consolidated Basis
HSBC Bank Australia Ltd 31 December 2014 Consolidated Basis Basel III as at 31 December 2014 Contents CONTENTS... 2 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 PURPOSE... 3 BACKGROUND... 3 2. SCOPE OF APPLICATION... 4 3. VERIFICATION...
More informationSummary Enterprise Risk Management Framework
Summary Enterprise Risk Management Framework Last Updated: September 26, 2016 CONTENTS I. Overview II. III. Risk Management Philosophy General Risk Management Activities Board of Directors Risk Management
More informationThe Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision & The Basel Capital Accords
The Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision & The Basel Capital Accords Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ( BCBS ) (www.bis.org: bcbs230 September 2012) Basel Committee on Banking
More informationPillar 3 Disclosure November 2016
Pillar 3 Disclosure November 2016 1 1. Overview 1.1 Background This document comprises the Capital and Risk Management Pillar 3 disclosures as at 30 September 2016 for River and Mercantile Group PLC and
More informationP a g e 1 FINANCE SECTOR CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
P a g e 1 FINANCE SECTOR CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Amended February 2016 P a g e 2 CONTENTS Page Introduction 5 Principles and Guidance 1. THE BOARD 8 Companies should be headed by an effective Board
More informationPillar 3 Disclosures for the year ending 31 December 2015
29, Avenue de la Porte-Neuve Pillar 3 Disclosures for the year ending 31 December 2015 Pillar 3 Disclosures for the year ending 31 December 2015 Table of content 1. Overview 4 1.1. Background 4 1.2. Scope
More informationBERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY THE INSURANCE CODE OF CONDUCT FEBRUARY 2010
Table of Contents 0. Introduction..2 1. Preliminary...3 2. Proportionality principle...3 3. Corporate governance...4 4. Risk management..9 5. Governance mechanism..17 6. Outsourcing...21 7. Market discipline
More informationEnterprise-wide Scenario Analysis
Finance and Private Sector Development Forum Washington April 2007 Enterprise-wide Scenario Analysis Jeffrey Carmichael CEO 25 April 2007 Date 1 Context Traditional stress testing is useful but limited
More informationConsultation Paper on the draft proposal for Guidelines on reporting and public disclosure
EIOPA-CP-14/047 27 November 2014 Consultation Paper on the draft proposal for Guidelines on reporting and public disclosure EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt Germany - Tel. + 49 69-951119-20;
More informationHSBC Bank Australia Ltd. Pillar 3 Disclosures. 31 December Consolidated Basis
HSBC Bank Australia Ltd 31 December 2013 Consolidated Basis Contents CONTENTS... 2 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 PURPOSE... 3 BACKGROUND... 3 2. SCOPE OF APPLICATION... 4 3. VERIFICATION... 4 4. HBAU CONTEXT...
More informationCredit risk, arising from losses due to obligor, counterparty or issuer failing to perform its contractual obligations to the Group;
Risk management is an integral part of the Group s business. An effective risk management system is critical for the Group to achieve continued profitability and sustainable growth in shareholder s value,
More informationINTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE
INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE Initial publication: April 2009 Updated: May 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preamble... ii Scope... iii Coming into effect and updating... iv Introduction... v 1. Integrated
More informationGUIDELINE ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
GUIDELINE ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT Insurance Authority Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Application 2 3. Overview of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework and 4 General Requirements
More informationIOPS Toolkit for Risk-Based Pensions Supervision Kenya
Risk-based Pensions Supervision provides a structured approach focusing on identifying potential risks faced by pension funds and assessing the financial and operational factors in place to mitigate those
More informationGuidance Note. Securitization. March Ce document est aussi disponible en français. Revised in October 2018
Guidance Note Securitization March 2018 Revised in October 2018 Ce document est aussi disponible en français. Applicability The Guidance Note: Securitization (Guidance Note) is for use by all credit unions
More informationHSBC Bank Australia Ltd. Pillar 3 Disclosures. 30 June Consolidated Basis
HSBC Bank Australia Ltd 30 June 2016 Consolidated Basis Basel III as at 30 June 2016 Contents CONTENTS... 2 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 PURPOSE... 3 BACKGROUND... 3 2. SCOPE OF APPLICATION... 4 3. VERIFICATION...
More informationDisclosure Prudential Disclosure Report. 12/31/2017 Derayah Financial
Derayah - Pillar III Disclosure -2017 Prudential Disclosure Report 12/31/2017 Derayah Financial Table of Contents 1. OVERVIEW... 2 2. CAPITAL STRUCTURE... 2 2.1. Disclosure on Capital Base... 3 3. CAPITAL
More informationAshmore Group plc Pillar 3 Disclosures as at 30 June 2018
Ashmore Group plc Pillar 3 Disclosures as at 30 June 2018 Table of Contents 1. OVERVIEW 3 1.1 BASIS OF DISCLOSURES 1.2 FREQUENCY OF DISCLOSURES 1.3 MEDIA AND LOCATION OF DISCLOSURES 2. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
More informationPillar 3 Disclosures 31 December 2011
HSBC Bank Australia Ltd 31 December 2011 Consolidated Basis Contents CONTENTS... 2 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 PURPOSE... 3 BACKGROUND... 3 2. SCOPE OF APPLICATION... 4 3. VERIFICATION... 4 4. HBAU CONTEXT...
More informationCover Note Authorisation and supervision of branches of thirdcountry insurance undertakings by the Central Bank of Ireland
Cover Note Authorisation and supervision of branches of thirdcountry insurance undertakings by the Central Bank of Ireland Consultation Paper 115 November 2017 [Type here] Consultation on the Authorisation
More informationPillar III Disclosures
GIB Capital Pillar III Disclosures Year ended 31 December 2017 Table of Contents 1. OVERVIEW... 3 2. SCOPE OF APPLICATION... 3 2.1 Pillar I Minimum capital requirements... 3 2.2 Pillar II Internal Capital
More informationDisclosure Prudential Disclosure Report. 12/31/2016 Derayah Financial
Derayah - Pillar III Disclosure -2016 Prudential Disclosure Report 12/31/2016 Derayah Financial Table of Contents 1. OVERVIEW... 2 2. CAPITAL STRUCTURE... 2 2.1. Disclosure on Capital Base... 3 3. CAPITAL
More informationRynda Property Investors LLP (the Firm )
Rynda Property Investors LLP (the Firm ) Disclosure Statement under Pillar III as at 30 th June 2018 Contents 1. Overview 2. Risk Management Objectives and Policies 3. Capital Resources 4. Capital Adequacy
More informationCompanion Policy CP to National Instrument Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and Interim Filings.
This is an unofficial consolidation of Companion Policy 52-109CP Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and Interim Filings reflecting amendments made effective January 1, 2011 in connection with
More informationSwiss Re Portfolio Partners S.A. Solvency and Financial Condition Report
Swiss Re Portfolio Partners S.A. (formerly iptiq Insurance S.A.) Solvency and Financial Condition Report For the period ended 31 December 2016 Swiss Re Portfolio Partners S.A. 2A, rue Albert Borschette
More informationAshmore Group plc Pillar 3 Disclosures as at 30 June 2016
Ashmore Group plc Pillar 3 Disclosures as at 30 June 2016 Table of Contents 1. OVERVIEW 3 1.1 BASIS OF DISCLOSURES 1.2 FREQUENCY OF DISCLOSURES 1.3 MEDIA AND LOCATION OF DISCLOSURES 2. CAPITAL RESOURCES
More informationEUROPEAN STANDARD OF ACTUARIAL PRACTICE 2 (ESAP 2) ACTUARIAL FUNCTION REPORT UNDER DIRECTIVE 2009/138/EC
ACTUARIAL ASSOCIATION OF EUROPE ASSOCIATION ACTUARIELLE EUROPÉENNE 4 PLACE DU SAMEDI B-1000 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM TEL: (+32) 22 17 01 21 FAX: (+32) 27 92 46 48 E-MAIL: info@actuary.eu WEB: www.actuary.eu EUROPEAN
More informationRule Corporate Governance for Insurers
Rule Corporate Governance for Insurers 1 Statement of Objectives 1.1 To set out the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority s ( Authority s ) rule on Corporate Governance for insurers, (each of the sub-paragraphs
More informationCOMPANION POLICY CP TO NATIONAL INSTRUMENT CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE IN ISSUERS ANNUAL AND INTERIM FILINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS
COMPANION POLICY 52-109CP TO NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 52-109 CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE IN ISSUERS ANNUAL AND INTERIM FILINGS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 Introduction and purpose 1.2 Application to non-corporate entities
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
Guidance Paper No. 9 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS GUIDANCE PAPER ON INVESTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT OCTOBER 2004 This document was prepared by the Investments Subcommittee in consultation
More informationEBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards
FINAL DRAFT RTS ON DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION RELATED TO THE COUNTERCYCLICAL BUFFER EBA/RTS/2014/17 23 December 2014 EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards on disclosure of information in relation
More informationEUROPEAN STANDARD OF ACTUARIAL PRACTICE 2 (ESAP 2) ACTUARIAL FUNCTION REPORT UNDER DIRECTIVE 2009/138/EC
ACTUARIAL ASSOCIATION OF EUROPE ASSOCIATION ACTUARIELLE EUROPÉENNE 4 PLACE DU SAMEDI B-1000 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM TEL: (+32) 22 17 01 21 FAX: (+32) 27 92 46 48 E-MAIL: info@actuary.eu WEB: www.actuary.eu EUROPEAN
More informationSupervisory Guidelines and Directives
Part II Supervisory Guidelines and Directives II. 1 II. 2 II. 3 II. 4 II. 5 II. 6 II. 7 II. 8 II.9 Asset Management Appointment of an external auditor Actuarial report and certification of a Life Insurance
More informationTechnical advice on delegated acts on the deferral of extraordinary ex-post contributions to financial arrangements
EBA/Op/2015/06 6 March 2015 Technical advice on delegated acts on the deferral of extraordinary ex-post contributions to financial arrangements 1. Legal references - Article 104(3) of Directive 2014/59/EU
More informationLiquidity Policy. Prudential Supervision Department Document BS13. Issued: January Ref #
Liquidity Policy Prudential Supervision Department Document Issued: 2 A. INTRODUCTION Liquidity policy and the Reserve Bank s objectives 1. This Liquidity Policy sets out the Reserve Bank of New Zealand
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Stress Testing Task Group Discussion Document 96 (v 3) General Stress Testing Guidance for Insurance Companies
Solvency Assessment and Management: Stress Testing Task Group Discussion Document 96 (v 3) General Stress Testing Guidance for Insurance Companies 1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The business of insurance is
More informationFRAMEWORK FOR SUPERVISORY INFORMATION
FRAMEWORK FOR SUPERVISORY INFORMATION ABOUT THE DERIVATIVES ACTIVITIES OF BANKS AND SECURITIES FIRMS (Joint report issued in conjunction with the Technical Committee of IOSCO) (May 1995) I. Introduction
More informationPILLAR III DISCLOSURES
PILLAR III DISCLOSURES 2014 PILLAR III Disclosures - 2014 Page 1 of 21 TABLE OF CONTENT 1 SCOPE OF APPLICATION... 4 1.1 PILLAR I MINIMUM CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS... 4 1.2 PILLAR II INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY
More informationMANAGERIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT concept and practical implementation Discussion paper I Introduction The objective of this discussion paper is to explain the concept of managerial accountability
More informationGuidance Note: Stress Testing Credit Unions with Assets Greater than $500 million. May Ce document est également disponible en français.
Guidance Note: Stress Testing Credit Unions with Assets Greater than $500 million May 2017 Ce document est également disponible en français. Applicability This Guidance Note is for use by all credit unions
More informationFIL Life Insurance (Ireland) DAC. Solvency and Financial Condition Report as at 30 June 2016
FIL Life Insurance (Ireland) DAC Solvency and Financial Condition Report as at 30 June 2016 1 Contents INTRODUCTION... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 6 A.1 Business... 8 A.2 Underwriting Performance... 9 A.3 Investment
More informationECB Guide to the internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (ILAAP)
ECB Guide to the internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (ILAAP) March 2018 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Purpose 3 1.2 Scope and proportionality 3 2 Principles 5 Principle 1 The management body
More informationRisk Analysis De Nederlandsche Bank N.V.
Risk Analysis De Nederlandsche Bank N.V. Agenda! Background and objectives! Risk analysis proces! Demonstration Risk Analysis Support Tool Background High High impact impact and and frequency frequency
More informationGuidelines on identification and management of step-in risk
Guidelines on identification and management of step-in risk Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) www.managementsolutions.com Research and Development November Página 2017 1 List of abbreviations
More informationBanque de Patrimoines Privés. Pillar 3 Disclosure Report 2016
Banque de Patrimoines Privés Pillar 3 Disclosure Report 2016 Table of Contents INDEX OF ABBREVIATIONS... 4 1. OVERVIEW... 5 1.1. Purpose... 5 1.2. Regulatory framework... 5 1.2.1. Pillar 1... 5 1.2.2.
More informationIntroduction. Regulatory environment in Legal Context
P. 15 Introduction Regulatory environment in 2017 Legal Context As a Spanish credit institution, BBVA is subject to Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council dated June 26, 2013,
More informationINTERNAL CAPITAL TARGET GUIDELINE ANNEX Summary of Consultation Comments and Financial Institutions Commission (FICOM) Responses
INTERNAL CAPITAL TARGET GUIDELINE ANNEX Summary of Consultation Comments and Financial Institutions Commission (FICOM) Responses INDUSTRY COMMENT CATEGORY: GENERAL Capital requirements are already prescribed
More informationOffice of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Internal Audit Report on Insurance Supervision Sector
Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Internal Audit Report on Insurance Supervision Sector Mortgage Insurance Group (MIG) June 2016 Table of Contents 1. Background... 3 2. About the Engagement...
More informationBASEL II - PILLAR III
BASEL II - PILLAR III DISCLOSURES 2009 ARESBANK PILAR III DISCLOSURES (December 31 st 2009) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 2 2. INTERNAL GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE... 3 3. RISK GOVERNANCE... 5 4. CAPITAL
More informationGuidelines on credit institutions credit risk management practices and accounting for expected credit losses
Guidelines on credit institutions credit risk management practices and accounting for expected credit losses European Banking Authority (EBA) www.managementsolutions.com Research and Development Management
More informationPRUDENTIAL REGULATION OF MFIs
PRUDENTIAL REGULATION OF MFIs Prudential Standards and Ratios Presented by Fatou Deen-Touray, Deputy Director, Microfinance Dept. Central Bank of The Gambia 1.INTRODUCTION 1. In many, if not most developing
More informationINTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS MODULE
INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS Table of Contents IC-A IC-1 Date Last Changed Introduction IC-A.1 Purpose 07/2018 IC-A.2 Module History 07/2018 General Requirements IC-1.1 Overview 07/2018
More informationUBS Saudi Arabia (A SAUDI JOINT STOCK COMPANY) Pillar III Disclosure As of 31 December 2014
UBS Saudi Arabia King Fahad Road Tatweer Towers Tower 4, 9 th Floor PO Box 75724 Riyadh 11588 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Tel. +966 (0) 11 203 8000 www.ubs.com UBS Saudi Arabia (A SAUDI JOINT STOCK COMPANY)
More information