CECL Initial and Subsequent Measurement
|
|
- Rosaline Ellis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CECL Initial and Subsequent Measurement About the Presenter Neekis Hammond, CPA Advisory Services
2 Implementation Timelines. 1. SEC Filing Institutions.
3 Implementation Timelines. 2. Non-SEC Filing Public Business Entities.
4 Implementation Timelines. INTERIM 3. All Other Entities + Not-For-Profit Institutions.
5 Agenda. Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A
6 Segmentation. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Proper Segmentation ( ) Segmentations or pools should have similar risk characteristics. These pools should be as granular as possible while maintaining statistical significance. Management will need to evaluate pools on an ongoing basis to ensure that the underlying assets continue to exhibit similar risk behavior.
7 Segmentation. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Proper Segmentation ( ) Segmentations or pools should have similar risk characteristics. These pools should be as granular Granular as possible while maintaining statistical significance. Management will need to evaluate pools on an ongoing basis to ensure that the underlying assets continue to exhibit similar risk behavior.
8 Segmentation. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Proper Segmentation ( ) Segmentations or pools should have similar risk characteristics. These pools should be as granular Granular as possible while maintaining statistical Statistical significance. Significance Management will need to evaluate pools on an ongoing basis to ensure that the underlying assets continue to exhibit similar risk behavior.
9 Segmentation. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Proper Segmentation ( ) Segmentations or pools should have similar risk characteristics. These pools should be as granular Granular as possible while maintaining statistical Statistical significance. Significance Management will need to evaluate pools on an ongoing basis to ensure that the underlying assets continue to exhibit similar risk behavior. Continue to exhibit similar risk behavior
10 Segmentation. 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0%
11 Segmentation. 10% 8% 6% Loss Rate 4% 2% 0%
12 Segmentation. 10% 8% 6% Loss Rate 4% 2% 0% Risk Rating
13 Segmentation. 10% 8% 6% Loss Rate 4% 2% 0% Risk Rating
14 Segmentation. 10% 8% 6% Loss Rate 4% 2% 0% Risk Rating
15 Segmentation Example. 1-4 Family First Lien Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2, ,000, % 6,472,500 Pass 1, ,000, % 4,712,500 Special Mention 30 2,000, % 10,000 Substandard 340 5,000, % 1,750,000 Doubtful % - Loss % -
16 Segmentation Example. 1-4 Family First Lien Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2, ,000, % 6,665,000 Pass 1, ,000, % 4,712,500 Special Mention 30 2,000, % 10,000 Substandard 340 5,000, % 1,750,000 Doubtful % - Loss % -
17 Segmentation Example. 1-4 Family First Lien Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2, ,000, % 3,658, % , % - 3 1, ,000, % 1,260, ,500, % 398, ,000, % 2,000, ,500, % 7, ,500, % 1,225, % % -
18 Segmentation Example. 1-4 Family First Lien Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2, ,000, % 3,658, % , % - 3 1, ,000, % 1,260, ,500, % 398, ,000, % 2,000, ,500, % 7, ,500, % 1,225, % % -
19 Segmentation Example. 1-4 Family First Lien Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2, ,000, % 3,658, % , % - 3 1, ,000, % 1,260, ,500, % 398, ,000, % 2,000, ,500, % 7, ,500, % 1,225, % % -
20 Segmentation Example. 1-4 Family First Lien Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2, ,000, % 3,658, % , % - 3 1, ,000, % 1,260, ,500, % 398, ,000, % 2,000, ,500, % 7, ,500, % 1,225, % % -
21 Segmentation Example. 1-4 Family First Lien Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2, ,000, % 6,472, Family First Lien Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2, ,000, % 3,658,750
22 Segmentation Example. 1-4 Family First Lien Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2, ,000, % 6,472, Family First Lien Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2, ,000, % 3,658,750 Risk Level Sub-segmentation» Pass cohort too consolidated.» Watchlist loans did not share risk characteristics with other Pass rated credits.
23 Segmentation Example. 1-4 Family First Lien Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2, ,000, % 6,472, Family First Lien Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2, ,000, % 3,658,750 Risk Rating Sub-segmentation» Pass cohort less consolidated.» Watchlist loans no longer impacting higher quality Pass rated credits.» Risk rating sub-segmentation still requires evaluation.
24 Agenda. Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A
25 Life-of-Loan. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Determining the Expected Life of Each Segment ( ) Entities are required to estimate expected credit losses over the contractual term of the financial asset(s). Prepayments will need to be considered as a separate input or embedded in the credit loss experience. Expected life is a critical component of all methodologies used to determine loss experience. Prepayment and/or mortality rates will provide for increased flexibility and defensibility.
26 Life-of-Loan. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Determining the Expected Life of Each Segment ( ) Entities are required to estimate expected credit losses over the contractual contractual term of the financial term asset(s). Prepayments will need to be considered as a separate input or embedded in the credit loss experience. Expected life is a critical component of all methodologies used to determine loss experience. Prepayment and/or mortality rates will provide for increased flexibility and defensibility.
27 Life-of-Loan. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Determining the Expected Life of Each Segment ( ) Entities are required to estimate expected credit losses over the contractual contractual term of the financial term asset(s). Prepayments will need to be considered as a separate input or embedded in the credit loss experience. Expected life is a critical component of all methodologies used to determine loss experience. Prepayments Prepayment and/or mortality rates will provide for increased flexibility and defensibility.
28 Life-of-Loan Calculation. Product Type Life of Pool Commercial RE 4.90 Commercial/Ag 1.95 Consumer - Auto 2.58 Farm RE 5.27 HELOC 5.54 RE Construction 3.31 RE Mortgage 6.27 Grand Total 3.63
29 Life-of-Loan Calculation. Product Type Attrition Active Commercial RE 417 7,514 Commercial/Ag 1,095 6,673 Consumer - Auto 1,222 10,572 Farm RE 76 1,483 HELOC ,753 RE Construction RE Mortgage ,599 Grand Total 3,971 51,311
30 Life-of-Loan Calculation. Product Type Attrition Active Attrition Commercial RE 417 7,514 6% Commercial/Ag 1,095 6,673 16% Consumer - Auto 1,222 10,572 12% Farm RE 76 1,483 5% HELOC ,753 5% RE Construction % RE Mortgage ,599 4% Grand Total 3,971 51,311 8%
31 Life-of-Loan Calculation. Product Type Attrition Active Attrition Annual Rate Commercial RE 417 7,514 6% 20% Commercial/Ag 1,095 6,673 16% 51% Consumer - Auto 1,222 10,572 12% 39% Farm RE 76 1,483 5% 19% HELOC ,753 5% 18% RE Construction % 30% RE Mortgage ,599 4% 16% Grand Total 3,971 51,311 8% 28%
32 Life-of-Loan Calculation. Product Type Commercial RE Commercial/Ag Consumer - Auto Farm RE HELOC RE Construction RE Mortgage Grand Total Annual Rate Life of Pool 20% % % % % % % % 3.63
33 Life-of-Loan Impact. Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 6,752,500 Pass ,000, % 5,820,000 Special Mention 25 8,500, % 212,500 Substandard 150 6,000, % 720,000
34 Life-of-Loan Impact. Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 6,752,500 Pass ,000, % 5,820,000 Special Mention 25 8,500, % 212,500 Substandard 150 6,000, % 720,000 Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 4,115,950 Pass ,000, % 3,395,000 Special Mention 25 8,500, % 90,950 Substandard 150 6,000, % 630,000
35 Life-of-Loan Impact. Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 6,752,500 Pass ,000, % 5,820,000 Special Mention 25 8,500, % 212,500 Substandard 150 6,000, % 720,000 Commercial RE WAM Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses WAL Total 1, ,500, % 4,115,950 Pass ,000, % 3,395,000 Special Mention 25 8,500, % 90,950 Substandard 150 6,000, % 630,000
36 Life-of-Loan Impact. Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 6,752,500 Pass ,000, % 5,820,000 Prepayments will need to be considered as a separate input or embedded in the credit loss experience. (ASC ) Special Mention 25 8,500, % 212,500 Substandard 150 6,000, % 720,000 Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 4,115,950 Pass ,000, % 3,395,000 Special Mention 25 8,500, % 90,950 Substandard 150 6,000, % 630,000
37 Life-of-Loan Impact. Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 6,752,500 Pass ,000, % 5,820,000 Calculating, documenting, and properly utilizing prepayment data is a critical component of the new standard. Special Mention 25 8,500, % 212,500 Substandard 150 6,000, % 720,000 Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 4,115,950 Pass ,000, % 3,395,000 Special Mention 25 8,500, % 90,950 Substandard 150 6,000, % 630,000
38 Agenda. Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A
39 Methodology. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Calculating Historical Loss Experience ( , 7-8) Understanding and documenting how each segment or pool reacts using various methodologies will yield more meaningful reserve levels and provide management, auditors and regulators with confidence that proper due diligence was performed. Some methodologies contain inherent limitations that limit utilization for some loan pools.
40 Methodology. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Calculating Historical Loss Experience ( , 7-8) Understanding and documenting how each segment or pool reacts using various methodologies will yield more meaningful reserve levels and provide management, auditors and regulators with confidence that proper due diligence was performed. Some methodologies contain inherent limitations that limit utilization for some loan pools.
41 Methodology. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Calculating Historical Loss Experience ( , 7-8) Understanding and documenting how each segment or pool reacts using various methodologies will yield more meaningful reserve levels and provide management, auditors and regulators with confidence that proper due diligence was performed. Some methodologies contain inherent limitations Inherent limitations that limit utilization for some loan pools.
42 Methodology. Consumer - Auto Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2,250 9,850, % 195,375 Pass 2,000 9,500, % 171,000 Special Mention , % 14,375 Substandard , % 10,000
43 Methodology. Consumer - Auto Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2,250 9,850, % 195,375 Pass 2,000 9,500, % 171,000 Special Mention , % 14,375 Substandard , % 10,000 Consumer - Auto Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total (Vintage) 2,250 9,850, % 118,002
44 Methodology. Consumer - Auto Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2,250 9,850, % 195,375 Pass 2,000 9,500, % 171,000 Special Mention , % 14,375 Substandard , % 10,000 Consumer - Auto Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total (Vintage) 2,250 9,850, % 118,002
45 Vintage Analysis. Origination Year Total Loss Remaining Loss 12/31/ % 1.10% 0.60% 0.25% 0.01% 0.03% 2.39% 0.00% 12/31/ % 0.85% 1.25% 0.40% 0.06% 0.03% 2.84% 0.03% 12/31/ % 0.95% 0.75% 0.06% 0.04% 0.03% 3.08% 0.07% 12/31/ % 0.65% 0.40% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 2.10% 0.30% 12/31/ % 0.60% 0.75% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 1.85% 1.05% 12/31/ % 0.83% 0.75% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 2.18% 1.88% Average 0.53% 0.83% 0.75% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 2.41%
46 Vintage Analysis. Loss Rate Year Subsequent to Origination Origination Year Total Loss Remaining Loss 12/31/ % 1.10% 0.60% 0.25% 0.01% 0.03% 2.39% 0.00% 12/31/ % 0.85% 1.25% 0.40% 0.06% 0.03% 2.84% 0.03% 12/31/ % 0.95% 0.75% 0.06% 0.04% 0.03% 3.08% 0.07% 12/31/ % 0.65% 0.40% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 2.10% 0.30% 12/31/ % 0.60% 0.75% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 1.85% 1.05% 12/31/ % 0.83% 0.75% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 2.18% 1.88% Average 0.53% 0.83% 0.75% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 2.41%
47 Vintage Analysis. Loss Rate Year Subsequent to Origination Origination Year Total Loss Remaining Loss 12/31/ % 1.10% 0.60% 0.25% 0.01% 0.03% 2.39% 0.00% 12/31/ % 0.85% 1.25% 0.40% 0.06% 0.03% 2.84% 0.03% 12/31/ % 0.95% 0.75% 0.06% 0.04% 0.03% 3.08% 0.07% Remaining loss estimate 12/31/ % 0.65% 0.40% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 2.10% 0.30% 12/31/ % 0.60% 0.75% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 1.85% 1.05% 12/31/ % 0.83% 0.75% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 2.18% 1.88% Average 0.53% 0.83% 0.75% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 2.41%
48 Vintage Analysis. Loss Rate Year Subsequent to Origination Origination Year Total Loss Remaining Loss 12/31/ % 1.10% 0.60% 0.25% 0.01% 0.03% 2.39% 0.00% 12/31/ % 0.85% 1.25% 0.40% 0.06% 0.03% 2.84% 0.03% 12/31/ % 0.95% 0.75% 0.06% 0.04% 0.03% 3.08% 0.07% 12/31/ % 0.65% 0.40% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 2.10% 0.30% 12/31/ % 0.60% 0.75% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 1.85% 1.05% Loss curve 12/31/ % 0.83% 0.75% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 2.18% 1.88% Average 0.53% 0.83% 0.75% 0.24% 0.04% 0.03% 2.41%
49 Vintage Analysis. Loss Rate Application Origination Year Remaining Balance Loss Rate Remaining Balance 12/31/ , % - 12/31/ , % 30 12/31/ , % /31/2013 1,500, % 4,525 12/31/2014 2,600, % 27,343 12/31/2015 4,550, % 85,616 Total 9,850, % 118,002
50 Vintage Analysis. Loss Rate Application Origination Year Remaining Balance Loss Rate Remaining Balance 12/31/ , % - 12/31/ , % 30 12/31/ , % /31/2013 1,500, % 4,525 12/31/2014 2,600, % 27,343 12/31/2015 4,550, % 85,616 Total 9,850, % 118,002
51 Methodology. Consumer - Auto Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2,250 9,850, % 195,375 Pass 2,000 9,500, % 171,000 Special Mention , % 14,375 Substandard , % 10,000 Consumer - Auto Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total (Vintage) 2,250 9,850, % 105,395
52 Methodology. Consumer - Auto Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 2,250 9,850, % 195,375 Understanding Pass and 2,000 documenting 9,500,000 how 1.80% each segment 171,000 or pool Special reacts Mentionusing various 150 methodologies 250, % will yield 14,375 more Substandard meaningful reserve 100 levels. 100, % 10,000 Consumer - Auto Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total (Vintage) 2,250 9,850, % 118,002
53 Methodology. 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 0% C & I Consumer CRE Mortgage Migration PD & LGD Vintage Cumulative
54 Methodology. Loss Rate 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 0% C & I Consumer CRE Mortgage Migration PD & LGD Vintage Cumulative
55 Methodology. Loss Rate 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 0% C & I Consumer CRE Mortgage Migration PD & LGD Vintage Cumulative Methodology
56 Methodology - Considerations. DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW
57 Methodology - Considerations. DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW + Flexible loss application and forecasting (loss curve)
58 Methodology - Considerations. DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW + Flexible loss application and forecasting (loss curve) + Less historical data required
59 Methodology - Considerations. DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW + Flexible loss application and forecasting (loss curve) + Less historical data required - Technical and data-heavy
60 Methodology - Considerations. MIGRATION, CUMULATIVE, AND PD/LGD
61 Methodology - Considerations. MIGRATION, CUMULATIVE, AND PD/LGD + Valuable portfolio risk management insight
62 Methodology - Considerations. MIGRATION, CUMULATIVE, AND PD/LGD + Valuable portfolio risk management insight + Valuable loan/product pricing insight
63 Methodology - Considerations. MIGRATION, CUMULATIVE, AND PD/LGD + Valuable portfolio risk management insight + Valuable loan/product pricing insight - Historical data required
64 Methodology - Considerations. VINTAGE
65 Methodology - Considerations. VINTAGE + Loss curve and declining balance is inherent in the calculation
66 Methodology - Considerations. VINTAGE + Loss curve and declining balance is inherent in the calculation + Valuable time specific and strategic insights
67 Methodology - Considerations. VINTAGE + Loss curve and declining balance is inherent in the calculation + Valuable time specific and strategic insights - Revolving loans and CRE renewals create heavy logistical and relevancy concerns
68 Agenda. Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A
69 Forecasting. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Reasonable and Supportable Forecasts ( ) The adjustments to historical loss information may be qualitative in nature and should reflect changes related to relevant data (such as changes in unemployment rates, property values, commodity values, delinquency, or other factors that are associated with credit losses on the financial asset or in the group of financial assets).
70 Forecasting. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Reasonable and Supportable Forecasts ( ) The adjustments to historical loss information may be qualitative in nature and should reflect changes related to relevant data (such as changes in unemployment rates, property values, commodity values, delinquency, or other factors that are associated with credit losses on the financial asset or in the group of financial assets). should reflect changes to related relevant data
71 Forecasting. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Reasonable and Supportable Forecasts ( ) The adjustments to historical loss information may be qualitative in nature and should reflect changes related to relevant data (such as changes in unemployment rates, property values, commodity values, delinquency, or other factors that are associated with credit losses on the financial asset or in the group of financial assets). should reflect changes to related relevant data unemployment
72 Forecasting. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Reasonable and Supportable Forecasts ( ) The adjustments to historical loss information may be qualitative in nature and should reflect changes related to relevant data (such as changes in unemployment rates, property values, commodity values, delinquency, or other factors other that factors are associated associated with credit losses with on the losses financial asset or in the group of financial assets). should reflect changes to related relevant data unemployment
73 Forecasting. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Reasonable and Supportable Forecasts ( ) An entity shall not rely solely on past events to estimate expected credit losses. When an entity uses historical loss information, it shall consider the need to adjust historical information to reflect the extent to which management expects current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts to differ from the conditions that existed for the period over which historical information was evaluated.
74 Forecasting. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Reasonable and Supportable Forecasts ( ) An entity shall not rely solely on past events to estimate expected credit losses. When an entity uses historical loss information, it shall consider the need to adjust historical information to adjust reflect the historical extent which information management expects current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts to differ from the conditions that existed for the period over which historical information was evaluated.
75 Forecasting. AGENDA Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A Reasonable and Supportable Forecasts ( ) An entity shall not rely solely on past events to estimate expected credit losses. When an entity uses historical loss information, it shall consider the need to adjust historical information to adjust reflect the historical extent which information management expects current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts to differ from from the conditions the conditions that existed for that the period over which historical information was evaluated. existed
76 Forecasting - Application. Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 6,752,500 Pass ,000, % 5,820,000 Special Mention 25 8,500, % 212,500 Substandard 150 6,000, % 720,000 Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 4,115,950 Pass ,000, % 3,395,000 Special Mention 25 8,500, % 90,950 Substandard 150 6,000, % 630,000
77 Forecasting - Application. Include Static Date Balance Charge-offs Recoveries Loss Rate Yes 12/31/ ,000,000 3,000, , % Yes 3/31/ ,000,000 2,750, , % Yes 6/30/ ,000,000 3,500, , % Yes 9/30/ ,000,000 2,700, , % Yes 12/31/ ,000,000 2,300, , % Yes 3/31/ ,000,000 1,850, , % Yes 6/30/ ,000,000 1,850, , % Yes 9/30/ ,000,000 1,700, , % Yes 12/31/ ,000,000 1,400,000 55, %
78 Forecasting - Application. Include Static Date Balance Charge-offs Recoveries Loss Rate Yes 12/31/ ,000,000 3,000, , % Yes 3/31/ ,000,000 2,750, , % Yes 6/30/ ,000,000 3,500, , % Yes 9/30/ ,000,000 2,700, , % Yes 12/31/ ,000,000 2,300, , % Yes 3/31/ ,000,000 1,850, , % Yes 6/30/ ,000,000 1,850, , % Yes 9/30/ ,000,000 1,700, , % Yes 12/31/ ,000,000 1,400,000 55, %
79 Forecasting - Application. Include Static Date Balance Charge-offs Recoveries Loss Rate Yes 12/31/ ,000,000 3,000, , % Yes 3/31/ ,000,000 2,750, , % Yes 6/30/ ,000,000 3,500, , % Yes 9/30/ ,000,000 2,700, , % Yes 12/31/ ,000,000 2,300, , % Yes 3/31/ ,000,000 1,850, , % Yes 6/30/ ,000,000 1,850, , % Yes 9/30/ ,000,000 1,700, , % Yes 12/31/ ,000,000 1,400,000 55, %
80 Forecasting - Application. Include Static Date Balance Charge-offs Recoveries Loss Rate No 12/31/ ,000,000 3,000, , % Unemployment > 8% (exceeds current forecast) No 3/31/ ,000,000 2,750, , % No 6/30/ ,000,000 3,500, , % Yes 9/30/ ,000,000 2,700, , % Yes 12/31/ ,000,000 2,300, , % Yes 3/31/ ,000,000 1,850, , % Yes 6/30/ ,000,000 1,850, , % Yes 9/30/ ,000,000 1,700, , % Yes 12/31/ ,000,000 1,400,000 55, %
81 Forecasting - Application. Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 6,752,500 Example calculation No prepayments No forecasting
82 Forecasting - Application. Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 6,752,500 Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 4,115,950 Example calculation No forecasting
83 Forecasting - Application. Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 6,752,500 Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 4,115,950 Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 2,747,250 Example calculation Prepayments - Forecasting
84 Forecasting - Application. Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 6,752,500 Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 4,115,950 Commercial RE Loan Count Loan Balance Loss Rate Estimated Losses Total 1, ,500, % 2,747,250 Example calculation Prepayments - Forecasting
85 Forecasting - Regression. 5.00% Baseline Scenario 4.50% 4.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00%
86 Forecasting - Regression. 5.00% 4.50% Baseline Scenario Actual C/O Experience 4.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00%
87 Forecasting - Regression. 5.00% 4.50% Baseline Scenario Actual C/O Experience 4.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% W Avg. - Singular Regression 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00%
88 Forecasting - Regression. 5.00% 4.50% Baseline Scenario Actual C/O Experience 4.00% 3.50% Multi Regression 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% W Avg. - Singular Regression 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00%
89 Forecasting - Regression. 5.00% Adverse Scenario 4.50% 4.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00%
90 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 4.00% 4.50% 5.00% Severely Adverse Scenario Forecasting - Regression.
91 Forecasting - Regression. External Factor (National Data) R Square Slope Lead (months) Real GDP growth 19.14% -0.24% 12 Nominal GDP growth 13.73% -0.17% 6 Real disposable income growth 2.89% -0.06% 6 Nominal disposable income growth 5.71% -0.08% 6 Unemployment rate 94.92% 0.78% 3 CPI inflation rate 3.28% -0.10% 6 3-month Treasury rate 41.29% -0.54% 3 5-year Treasury yield 36.22% -0.66% 6 10-year Treasury yield 18.55% -0.59% 6 BBB corporate yield 0.31% 0.07% 6 Mortgage rate 27.30% -0.74% 3 Prime rate 40.02% -0.51% 3 Dow Jones Total Stock Market Index (Level) 3.61% 0.00% 3 House Price Index (Level) 65.62% -0.06% 3 Commercial Real Estate Price Index (Level) 19.02% -0.02% 3 Market Volatility Index (Level) 40.78% 0.07% 12
92 Forecasting - Regression. External Factor (National Data) R Square Slope Lead (months) Real GDP growth 19.14% -0.24% 12 Nominal GDP growth 13.73% -0.17% 6 Real disposable income growth 2.89% -0.06% 6 Nominal disposable income growth 5.71% -0.08% 6 Unemployment rate 94.92% 0.78% 3 CPI inflation rate 3.28% -0.10% 6 3-month Treasury rate 41.29% -0.54% 3 5-year Treasury yield 36.22% -0.66% 6 10-year Treasury yield 18.55% -0.59% 6 BBB corporate yield 0.31% 0.07% 6 Mortgage rate 27.30% -0.74% 3 Prime rate 40.02% -0.51% 3 Dow Jones Total Stock Market Index (Level) 3.61% 0.00% 3 House Price Index (Level) 65.62% -0.06% 3 Commercial Real Estate Price Index (Level) 19.02% -0.02% 3 Market Volatility Index (Level) 40.78% 0.07% 12
93 Forecasting - Regression. External Factor (National Data) R Square Slope Lead (months) Real GDP growth 19.14% -0.24% 12 Nominal GDP growth 13.73% -0.17% 6 Real disposable income growth 2.89% -0.06% 6 Nominal disposable income growth 5.71% -0.08% 6 Unemployment rate 94.92% 0.78% 3 CPI inflation rate 3.28% -0.10% 6 3-month Treasury rate 41.29% -0.54% 3 5-year Treasury yield 36.22% -0.66% 6 10-year Treasury yield 18.55% -0.59% 6 BBB corporate yield 0.31% 0.07% 6 Mortgage rate 27.30% -0.74% 3 Prime rate 40.02% -0.51% 3 Dow Jones Total Stock Market Index (Level) 3.61% 0.00% 3 House Price Index (Level) 65.62% -0.06% 3 Commercial Real Estate Price Index (Level) 19.02% -0.02% 3 Market Volatility Index (Level) 40.78% 0.07% 12
94 Forecasting - Regression. External Factor (National Data) R Square Slope Lead (months) Real GDP growth 19.14% -0.24% 12 Regression Utilization Coefficients Nominal GDP growth 13.73% -0.17% 6 Real Intercept dispo-sable income growth 2.89% -0.06% -6.62% 6 Nominal dispo-sable income growth 5.71% -0.08% 6 Un-employment rate 0.93% Un-employ-ment rate 94.92% 0.78% 3 CPI 5-year inflation Treasury rate yield 3.28% -0.10% 0.01% 6 3-month Treasury rate 41.29% -0.54% 3 House Price Index (Level) 0.01% 5-year Treasury yield 36.22% -0.66% 6 Market Volatility Index (Level) 0.00% 10-year Treasury yield 18.55% -0.59% 6 BBB corporate yield 0.31% 0.07% 6 Mortgage rate 27.30% -0.74% 3 Prime rate 40.02% -0.51% 3 Dow Jones Total Stock Market Index (Level) 3.61% 0.00% 3 House Price Index (Level) 65.62% -0.06% 3 Com-mercial Real Estate Price Index (Level) 19.02% -0.02% 3 Market Volatility Index (Level) 40.78% 0.07% 12
95 Forecasting - Regression. External Factor (National Data) R Square Slope Lead (months) Real GDP growth 19.14% -0.24% 12 Regression Utilization How much Coefficients of the change in the Intercept dependent variable -6.62% can be explained Un-employment rate by each respective 0.93% independent 5-year Treasury yield (external) factor 0.01% House Price Index (Level) 0.01% Market Volatility Index (Level) 0.00% Nominal GDP growth 13.73% -0.17% 6 Real dispo-sable income growth 2.89% -0.06% 6 Nominal dispo-sable income growth 5.71% -0.08% 6 Un-employ-ment rate 94.92% 0.78% 3 CPI inflation rate 3.28% -0.10% 6 3-month Treasury rate 41.29% -0.54% 3 5-year Treasury yield 36.22% -0.66% 6 10-year Treasury yield 18.55% -0.59% 6 BBB corporate yield 0.31% 0.07% 6 Mortgage rate 27.30% -0.74% 3 Prime rate 40.02% -0.51% 3 Dow Jones Total Stock Market Index (Level) 3.61% 0.00% 3 House Price Index (Level) 65.62% -0.06% 3 Commercial Real Estate Price Index (Level) 19.02% -0.02% 3 Market Volatility Index (Level) 40.78% 0.07% 12
96 Forecasting - Regression. External Factor (National Data) R Square Slope Lead (months) Regression Utilization The impact Coefficients on the dependent Intercept variable given a -6.62% one unit change in Un-employment rate the independent 0.93% (external) factor 5-year Treasury yield 0.01% House Price Index (Level) 0.01% Market Volatility Index (Level) 0.00% Real GDP growth 19.14% -0.24% 12 Nominal GDP growth 13.73% -0.17% 6 Real dispo-sable income growth 2.89% -0.06% 6 Nominal dispo-sable income growth 5.71% -0.08% 6 Un-employ-ment rate 94.92% 0.78% 3 CPI inflation rate 3.28% -0.10% 6 3-month Treasury rate 41.29% -0.54% 3 5-year Treasury yield 36.22% -0.66% 6 10-year Treasury yield 18.55% -0.59% 6 BBB corporate yield 0.31% 0.07% 6 Mortgage rate 27.30% -0.74% 3 Prime rate 40.02% -0.51% 3 Dow Jones Total Stock Market Index (Level) 3.61% 0.00% 3 House Price Index (Level) 65.62% -0.06% 3 Commercial Real Estate Price Index (Level) 19.02% -0.02% 3 Market Volatility Index (Level) 40.78% 0.07% 12
97 Forecasting - Regression. External Factor (National Data) R Square Slope Lead (months) Real GDP growth 19.14% -0.24% 12 Regression Utilization Coefficients Intercept -6.62% Un-employment rate 0.93% 5-year Treasury yield 0.01% House Price Index (Level) 0.01% Market Volatility Index (Level) 0.00% Nominal GDP growth 13.73% -0.17% 6 Real dispo-sable income growth 2.89% -0.06% 6 Nominal dispo-sable income growth 5.71% -0.08% 6 Un-employ-ment rate 94.92% 0.78% 3 CPI inflation rate 3.28% -0.10% 6 3-month Treasury rate 41.29% -0.54% 3 5-year Treasury yield 36.22% -0.66% 6 10-year Treasury yield 18.55% -0.59% 6 BBB corporate yield 0.31% 0.07% 6 Mortgage rate 27.30% -0.74% 3 Estimated C/O = Intercept + (Coefficient * Underlying Variable) Prime rate 40.02% -0.51% 3 Dow Jones Total Stock Market Index (Level) 3.61% 0.00% 3 House Price Index (Level) 65.62% -0.06% 3 Commercial Real Estate Price Index (Level) 19.02% -0.02% 3 Market Volatility Index (Level) 40.78% 0.07% 12
98 Agenda. Segmentation Life-of-Loan Methodology Forecasting Q&A
CECL: A Discussion. June 16, 2016 P R E S E N T E D B Y
CECL: A Discussion June 16, 2016 P R E S E N T E D B Y About Sageworks. Neekis Hammond Neekis specializes in ALLL - ASC 450-20 and ASC 310-10; CECL preparation and methodology; acquired loan accounting
More informationCurrent Expected Loss Model: A Practical Implementation Approach for Community Banks
Current Expected Loss Model: A Practical Implementation Approach for Community Banks David Heneke, CPA, CISA, Principal Liz Rider, CPA, Principal Investment advisory services are offered through CliftonLarsonAllen
More informationCECL Time to Start Will Neeriemer, Partner DHG Financial Services. financial services
CECL Time to Start Will Neeriemer, Partner DHG Financial Services 1 About DHG DHG Financial Services, a national practice of Dixon Hughes Goodman, focuses on publicly traded and privately-held financial
More informationCECL Initial and Subsequent Measurement A Practical Approach
CECL Initial and Subsequent Measurement A Practical Approach June 8, 2017 Neekis Hammond, CPA Principal - Advisory Services 1 Loan portfolio and risk management solutions More than 1,000 financial institution
More informationEstimating CECL s Impact on Your Community Bank
Estimating CECL s Impact on Your Community Bank David Heneke, CPA, CISA, Principal Josh Juergensen, CPA, Principal Investment advisory services are offered through CliftonLarsonAllen Wealth Advisors, LLC,
More informationSAVE THE DATE! 22nd Annual CFO Council Conference The Disneyland Hotel Anaheim, CA May 15 18, 2016
SAVE THE DATE! 22nd Annual CFO Council Conference The Disneyland Hotel Anaheim, CA May 15 18, 2016 2 A Practical Guide to the Allowance for Expected Credit Loss FASB Subtopic 825-15 Agenda 1 2 3 4 Introduction
More informationFinancial Instruments Credit Losses How to Calculate CECL in Excel Monday, June 11, 2018
Financial Instruments Credit Losses How to Calculate CECL in Excel Monday, June 11, 2018 Presented by: Ryan Abdoo, CPA, CGMA Industry Technical Leader Plante Moran Chris Ritter, CPA Partner Plante Moran
More informationAre you prepared? FASB s CECL Model for Impairment Demystifying the Proposed Standard
Are you prepared? FASB s CECL Model for Impairment Demystifying the Proposed Standard Chad Kellar, CPA Senior Manager Crowe Horwath LLP Lauren Smith, CPA Senior Manager Primatics Financial Raj Mehra Executive
More informationComplying with CECL. We assess five ways to implement the new regulations. September 2017
Complying with CECL We assess five ways to implement the new regulations September 2017 Analytical contacts Manish Kumar Director, Risk & Analytics, India manish.kumar@crisil.com Manish Malhotra Lead Analyst,
More informationFASB s CECL Model: Navigating the Changes
FASB s CECL Model: Navigating the Changes Planning for Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) By R. Chad Kellar, CPA, and Matthew A. Schell, CPA, CFA Audit Tax Advisory Risk Performance 1 Crowe Horwath
More informationInside the new credit loss model
August 2016 Inside the new credit loss model Requirements and implementation considerations An article by Chad Kellar, CPA, and Matthew A. Schell, CPA, CFA Audit / Tax / Advisory / Risk / Performance Smart
More informationCECL guidebook. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE FASB FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CREDIT LOSS MODEL September 2016
CECL guidebook. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE FASB FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CREDIT LOSS MODEL September 2016 Table of contents BACKGROUND 1 FINANCIAL ASSETS MEASURED AT AMORTIZED COST AND ON LEASES 3 PURCHASED FINANCIAL
More informationNavigating the CECL Roadmap October 4, 2018
Navigating the CECL Roadmap October 4, 2018 Presented By: Bill Astrab, CPA Senior Audit Manager Agenda Part I: Understanding the CECL Model: What is CECL and Why? Difference Between Incurred Loss Model
More informationCECL Sleepless Nights
CECL Sleepless Nights What Should be Keeping you up at Night Measure Expected Credit Losses on Amortized Assets (CECL) The new Credit Loss standard applies to all amortizable assets included in the following
More informationThe Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Mid-Cycle Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results July 13, 2015 Severely Adverse Scenario
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 2015 Mid-Cycle Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results July 13, 2015 Severely Adverse Scenario Introduction Throughout this document The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
More informationDodd-Frank Act Company-Run Stress Test Disclosures
Dodd-Frank Act Company-Run Stress Test Disclosures June 21, 2018 Table of Contents The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 BACKGROUND... 3 2018 SUPERVISORY SEVERELY ADVERSE
More informationWider Fields: IFRS 9 credit impairment modelling
Wider Fields: IFRS 9 credit impairment modelling Actuarial Insights Series 2016 Presented by Dickson Wong and Nini Kung Presenter Backgrounds Dickson Wong Actuary working in financial risk management:
More informationCredit Modeling, CECL, Concentration, and Capital Stress Testing
Credit Modeling, CECL, Concentration, and Capital Stress Testing Presented by Wilary Winn Douglas Winn, President Brenda Lidke, Director Frank Wilary, Principal Matt Erickson, Director September 26, 2016
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc Dodd-Frank Act Mid-Cycle Stress Test Results. September 16, 2013
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 2013 Dodd-Frank Act Mid-Cycle Stress Test Results September 16, 2013 1 Dodd-Frank Act Mid-Cycle Stress Test Results for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Overview and requirements
More informationCECL Webinar Series: The Roadmap to Success. Irina Korablev, Senior Director Deniz Tudor, Director Anna Krayn, Senior Director
CECL Webinar Series: The Roadmap to Success Irina Korablev, Senior Director Deniz Tudor, Director Anna Krayn, Senior Director August 24, 2017 Moody s Analytics CECL Webinar Series: The Roadmap to Success
More informationSimple But Not Simpler: Day 1 Modeling Approaches. A review of simple approaches available to community banks on the road to their CECL journey.
Simple But Not Simpler: Day 1 Modeling Approaches A review of simple approaches available to community banks on the road to their CECL journey. A Word on Incurred Loss Approach Today Typical ALLL at a
More informationLoan Default Analysis: A Case for CECL Tuesday, June 12, :30 pm
Loan Default Analysis: A Case for CECL Tuesday, June 12, 2018 1:30 pm Insert Your Photo Here If no photo is available, center contact details on page. Presented by: Guo Chen Director, Quantitative Research
More informationLoan Portfolio Management
Loan Portfolio Management Michael Wear 2016 1 2 ALLL Activity - Summary ($000) 2013 2014 2015 6/2016 Beginning 2,456 3,471 4,343 6,513 Balance Provisions 2,000 2,000 8,000 6,000 Net Charge-offs Ending
More informationThe Presenter. Charles N. McQueen. Founded McQueen Financial in 1999 SEC Registered Investment Advisor Asset Liability Management.
CECL The Presenter Charles N. McQueen Founded McQueen Financial in 1999 SEC Registered Investment Advisor Asset Liability Management Page 2 McQueen Financial Advisors SEC Registered Investment Advisor
More informationSageworks Advisory Services PRACTICAL CECL TRANSITION EXPEDIENTS VERSUS CASH FLOWS
Sageworks Advisory Services PRACTICAL CECL TRANSITION EXPEDIENTS VERSUS CASH FLOWS Use of this content constitutes acceptance of the license terms incorporated at http://www./cecl-transition-content-license/.
More informationLoan Level Mortgage Modeling
Loan Level Mortgage Modeling Modeling and Data Challenges Shirish Chinchalkar October 2015 Agenda 1. The complexity of loan level modeling 2. Our approach for modeling mortgages 3. Data Challenges 4. Conclusion
More informationUnravelling the Guidelines in Preparation for CECL (ASU ) 11/29/2016
Unravelling the Guidelines in Preparation for CECL (ASU 2016-13) 11/29/2016 1 Today s Agenda Introductions CECL Overview Impact on the Institution i Calculation Methodologies Data Requirements Disclosure
More informationSunTrust Banks, Inc. Dodd-Frank Act Mid-Cycle Stress Test 2013 Results Disclosure
SunTrust Banks, Inc. Dodd-Frank Act Mid-Cycle Stress Test 2013 Results Disclosure September 18, 2013 Page 1 of 16 9/18/2013 Overview SunTrust ( the Company ) regularly evaluates financial and capital forecasts
More informationCOUNTDOWN TO CECL: IS YOUR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION ON TRACK?
COUNTDOWN TO CECL: IS YOUR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION ON TRACK? Presented by: Scott Deters David Klopfer Katie Schnieber COUNTDOWN TO CECL: IS YOUR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION ON TRACK? Presented by: Scott Deters
More informationROLL WITH CONFIDENCE. What You Need to Know About CECL: REAL ANSWERS, REAL GUIDANCE. Tracy Harding, CPA Rob Smalley, CPA
ROLL WITH CONFIDENCE What You Need to Know About CECL: REAL ANSWERS, REAL GUIDANCE Tracy Harding, CPA Rob Smalley, CPA Agenda CECL Overview Example (yes a real example with numbers!) Acquisitions Process
More informationPractical Issues in the Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) Model: Effective Loan Life and Forward-looking Information
Practical Issues in the Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) Model: Effective Loan Life and Forward-looking Information Deming Wu * Office of the Comptroller of the Currency E-mail: deming.wu@occ.treas.gov
More informationThe Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Mid-cycle Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Mid-cycle Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results October 12, 2018 1 Introduction Throughout this document The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation on a consolidated basis
More informationCECL ONE YEAR CLOSER
CECL ONE YEAR CLOSER Greg Clausen Partner Eide Bailly LLP Darrell Lingle Partner Eide Bailly LLP CECL One Year Closer to Implementation Greg Clausen, CPA Partner gclausen@eidebailly.com 515.875.7595 Darrell
More informationWhat are CECL gaps in the current ALLL process?
What are CECL gaps in the current ALLL process? Considerations for implementing the forthcoming Accounting for Financial Instruments: Credit Losses standard Zions Bancorporation Alexander Hume Controller
More informationA CECL Primer. About CECL
A CECL Primer Introduction The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief overview of Visible Equity s solution to CECL (Current Expected Credit Loss). Many facets of our CECL solution, such as the methods
More informationREACHTalks Preparing for the CECL Model Implementation
REACHTalks Preparing for the CECL Model Implementation Bryan W. Mogensen, CPA Thomas G. Johnson, CPA Investment advisory services are offered through CliftonLarsonAllen Wealth Advisors, LLC, an SEC registered
More informationALLL Today: Challenges & Solutions.
ALLL Today: Challenges & Solutions. September 14 2016 ALLL Today: Challenges & Solutions. September 15, 2016 P R E S E N T E D B Y Tim McPeak Executive Risk Management Consultant Sageworks Agenda. Current
More informationAccounting and Auditing Update WBA/OBA CFO Conference PRESENTED BY: LOUISE HANSON, PARTNER, MOSS ADAMS LLP
Accounting and Auditing Update WBA/OBA CFO Conference PRESENTED BY: LOUISE HANSON, PARTNER, MOSS ADAMS LLP Accounting and Auditing Update LOUISE HANSON, BUSINESS ASSURANCE PARTNER Disclaimer The material
More informationAll of the Method None of the Madness
CECL Simplified Current Expected Credit Losses ASU 2016-13 All of the Method None of the Madness The ProBank Austin 2017 Webinar Series November 9, 2017 11:00 AM ESDT Live Case Study - CECL I. Example
More informationThe Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Mid-cycle Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results. October 23, Severely Adverse Scenario
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Mid-cycle Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results October 23, 2017 Severely Adverse Scenario Introduction Throughout this document The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
More informationFrequently Asked Questions:
Frequently Asked Questions: CECL for Community Banks and Credit Unions What is the current expected credit loss (CECL)? The current expected credit loss (CECL) is a new GAAP accounting standard that will
More informationCECL Accounting Guide
CECL Accounting Guide Contents 04 INTRODUCTION Background 05 Guide Overview 07 CECL Scope and Highlights 08 Introductory Example 09 37 CREDIT QUALITY DISCLOSURES Credit Quality Indicators 38 Management
More informationCECL Webinar Series: The Roadmap to Success. Glenn Levine, Associate Director David Fieldhouse, Director
CECL Webinar Series: The Roadmap to Success Glenn Levine, Associate Director David Fieldhouse, Director September 6, 2017 Moody s Analytics CECL Webinar Series: The Roadmap to Success TODAY Lifetime Expected
More informationBank of America Dodd-Frank Act Mid-Cycle Stress Test Results BHC Severely Adverse Scenario July 17, 2015
Bank of America Dodd-Frank Act Mid-Cycle Stress Test Results BHC Severely Adverse Scenario July 17, 2015 Important Presentation Information The 2015 Dodd-Frank Act Mid-Cycle Stress Test Results Disclosure
More informationOverview of ASC (CECL)
Overview of ASC 326-20 (CECL) FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-13, Financial Instruments Credit Losses Topic 326 was approved in June 2016. FASB replaced the current incurred loss accounting
More informationThe Goldman, Sachs Sachs Group, & Co. Inc Mid-Cycle Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure
The Goldman, Sachs Sachs Group, & Co. Inc. 2015 Mid-Cycle Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure July 2015 1 2015 Mid-Cycle Dodd-Frank Act Company-Run Stress Test Disclosure for The Goldman Sachs Group,
More informationCECL: Data, Scenarios and Cash Flow Thoughts
CECL: Data, Scenarios and Cash Flow Thoughts H. Walter Young November 14, 2016 2016 Risk Management Association Annual Risk Management Conference Dallas, Texas Table of Contents I. Data: Not all data is
More informationMaking the Business Case for the CECL Approach
Making the Business Case for the CECL Approach Attend any recent or upcoming financial institution conference and you will find considerable discussion and debate about the new accounting guidance related
More informationHSBC North America Holdings Inc Mid-Cycle Company-Run Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results. Date: July 16, 2015
Date: July 16, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Overview of Mid-Cycle Company-Run Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test... 1 2. Description of the Bank Holding Company Severely Adverse scenario... 1 3. Forecasting
More informationCECL Workshop Discounted Cash Flow Method
CECL Workshop Discounted Cash Flow Method Martin M. Caine, CPA Alan D. Lloyd, CPA MEMBER OF ALLINIAL GLOBAL, AN ASSOCIATION OF LEGALLY INDEPENDENT FIRMS 2017 Wolf & Company, P.C. Introduction Martin Caine,
More informationUsing R for Regulatory Stress Testing Modeling
Using R for Regulatory Stress Testing Modeling Thomas Zakrzewski (Tom Z.,) Head of Architecture and Digital Design S&P Global Market Intelligence Risk Services May 19 th, 2017 requires the prior written
More informationSageworks Advisory Services PRACTICAL CECL TRANSITION DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW (DCF)
Sageworks Advisory Services PRACTICAL CECL TRANSITION DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW (DCF) Use of this content constitutes acceptance of the license terms incorporated at https://www./cecl-transition-content-license/.
More informationCurrent Expected Credit Loss Model
November 2012 Current Expected Credit Loss Model This presentation has been prepared to help constituents understand the current status of projects of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). The
More informationCorporate America Credit Union Annual Meeting Preparing for FASB Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) Model April 2017
Corporate America Credit Union Annual Meeting Preparing for FASB Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) Model April 2017 Eve Rogers, Partner Atlanta, GA Merri Ellen Wadsworth, Senior Manager Atlanta, GA 2016
More informationSageworks Advisory Services PRACTICAL CECL TRANSITION GUIDANCE SUMMARY
Sageworks Advisory Services PRACTICAL CECL TRANSITION GUIDANCE SUMMARY Use of this content constitutes acceptance of the license terms incorporated at https://www./cecl-transition-content-license/. This
More informationFrequently Asked Questions: Supervisory Methodologies in CCAR 2012
Frequently Asked Questions: Supervisory Methodologies in CCAR 2012 On March 21 and March 22, 2012, the Federal Reserve held five industry outreach calls to provide the bank holding companies (BHCs) that
More informationCECL Update - What Should Your Bank Be Doing Right Now? Todd Sprang, Principal David Heneke, Principal
CECL Update - What Should Your Bank Be Doing Right Now? Todd Sprang, Principal David Heneke, Principal OVERVIEW CECL Overview Transitioning from incurred loss to lifetime loss Form an Implementation Committee
More informationBB&T Corporation. Dodd-Frank Act Company-run Stress Test Disclosure
BB&T Corporation Dodd-Frank Act Company-run Stress Test Disclosure June 23, 2016 1 Introduction BB&T Corporation (BB&T) is one of the largest financial services holding companies in the U.S. with approximately
More informationFirst Hawaiian Bank Dodd-Frank Act (DFA) 2015 Stress Test Results. June 15, 2015
First Hawaiian Bank Dodd-Frank Act (DFA) 2015 Stress Test Results June 15, 2015 First Hawaiian Bank DFA Stress Test Results SUMMARY The purpose of the Dodd Frank Act stress test, which is jointly administered
More informationCECL Modeling FAQs. CECL FAQs
CECL FAQs Moody s Analytics helps firms with implementation of expected credit loss and impairment analysis for CECL and other evolving accounting standards. We provide advisory services, data, economic
More informationThe CECL Workshop Series. CECL Finalization & Methodologies
The CECL Workshop Series. CECL Finalization & Methodologies June 7, 2016 P R E S E N T E D B Y Todd Sprang CliftonLarsonAllen Tom Danielson CliftonLarsonAllen Tim McPeak Sageworks About the Webinar. Ask
More informationCECL Methodology Series Disclosures
CECL Methodology Series Disclosures April 18, 2017 About the Webinar We will address as many questions as we can throughout the presentation or through direct communication via follow-up email Ask questions
More informationAnalyzing Current Loan Performance Under CECL. A Discussion Paper of the AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION. ABA Contact: Michael L.
Analyzing Current Loan Performance Under CECL A Discussion Paper of the AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION ABA Contact: Michael L. Gullette SVP Tax and Accounting mgullette@aba.com 202-663-4986 address the practical
More informationEvaluating the Credit Loss Estimates in M&A / Capital Raise Scenarios. David H. Ruffin Director DHG Credit Risk Management
Evaluating the Credit Loss Estimates in M&A / Capital Raise Scenarios David H. Ruffin Director DHG Credit Risk Management Agenda (September 14, 2017) A decade of credit mark / portfolio loss estimates
More informationChallenges For Measuring Lifetime PDs On Retail Portfolios
CFP conference 2016 - London Challenges For Measuring Lifetime PDs On Retail Portfolios Vivien BRUNEL September 20 th, 2016 Disclaimer: this presentation reflects the opinions of the author and not the
More informationCELC Workshop Historical Loss Rate Model
CELC Workshop Historical Loss Rate Model Jim McGough, CPA, CGMA Michaela Bellefeuille, CPA MEMBER OF ALLINIAL GLOBAL, AN ASSOCIATION OF LEGALLY INDEPENDENT FIRMS 2017 Wolf & Company, P.C. Introduction
More information2017 CEO & Board University What Boards Need to Know About CECL
2017 CEO & Board University What Boards Need to Know About CECL Jim McGough, CPA, CGMA MEMBER OFALLINIAL GLOBAL, AN ASSOCIATION OF LEGALLY INDEPENDENT FIRMS 2017 Wolf & Company, P.C. Introduction Jim McGough,
More informationAccounting Update. John Rieger, Deputy Chief Accountant, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Washington, DC
A Regulatory Update John Rieger, Deputy Chief Accountant, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Washington, DC Caren Hill, CPA, Western District, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Denver CO Tullus
More informationBB&T Corporation. Dodd-Frank Act Company-run Stress Test Disclosure
BB&T Corporation Dodd-Frank Act Company-run Stress Test Disclosure June 21, 2018 1 Introduction BB&T Corporation (BB&T) is one of the largest financial services holding companies in the U.S. with approximately
More informationHarley-Davidson, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549 FORM 10-Q x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended
More informationBank of America 2015 Dodd-Frank Act Annual Stress Test Results Supervisory Severely Adverse Scenario March 5, 2015
Bank of America 2015 Dodd-Frank Act Annual Stress Test Results Supervisory Severely Adverse Scenario March 5, 2015 Important Presentation Information The 2015 Dodd-Frank Act Annual Stress Test Results
More informationSAGICOR FINANCIAL CORPORATION LIMITED
Interim Financial Statements Three-months ended March 31, 2018 FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE CHAIRMAN S REVIEW The Sagicor Group recorded another solid performance for the first three months to March 31, 2018.
More information2018 Annual Stress Test Disclosure Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
Citi 2018 2018 Annual Stress Test Disclosure Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act June 21, 2018 Overview 2018 Annual Stress Test In February 2018, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) launched
More informationFASB Releases the Final CECL Accounting Standard
FASB Releases the Final CECL Accounting Standard June 24, 2016 The Financial Accounting Standards Board s (FASB) latest Accounting Standards Update, ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments Credit Losses
More informationLinking Stress Testing and Portfolio Credit Risk. Nihil Patel, Senior Director
Linking Stress Testing and Portfolio Credit Risk Nihil Patel, Senior Director October 2013 Agenda 1. Stress testing and portfolio credit risk are related 2. Estimating portfolio loss distribution under
More informationLOAN DEFAULT ANALYSIS: A CASE STUDY FOR CECL by Guo Chen, PhD, Director, Quantitative Research, ZM Financial Systems
LOAN DEFAULT ANALYSIS: A CASE STUDY FOR CECL by Guo Chen, PhD, Director, Quantitative Research, ZM Financial Systems THE DATA Data Overview Since the financial crisis banks have been increasingly required
More informationHarley-Davidson, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549 FORM 10-Q x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended
More informationChallenges in CECL Implementation. Robby Holditch, Director, Solutions Specialist July 2018
Challenges in CECL Implementation Robby Holditch, Director, Solutions Specialist July 2018 Today s Discussion Points» The start line existing tools and needed tools to comply» The race to an easy implementation
More informationHarley-Davidson, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549 FORM 10-Q x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended
More informationAccounting for Financial Instruments Impairment Current Expected Credit Losses ( CECL ) By Candy Wright & Vincent Milano, P&N
The Unique Alternative to the Big Four Accounting for Financial Instruments Impairment Current Expected Credit Losses ( CECL ) By Candy Wright & Vincent Milano, P&N Presentation Agenda Project Status Current
More informationMST Loan Loss Analyzer Platform for CECL
MST Loan Loss Analyzer Platform for CECL MST empowers financial institutions with confidence in their allowance estimations and transition to CECL through innovative software solutions, advisory services,
More information2017 DFAST Mid-Cycle Stress Test Disclosure Citi Severely Adverse Scenario
Citi 2017 2017 DFAST Mid-Cycle Stress Test Disclosure Citi Severely Adverse Scenario October 27, 2017 2017 Mid-Cycle Stress Test Overview Under the stress testing requirements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
More informationBest Practices for Stress Testing your Private Firm C&I Portfolio
Best Practices for Stress Testing your Private Firm C&I Portfolio Douglas Dwyer, Managing Director RiskCalc Research Mehna Raissi, Director, RiskCalc Product Management Christian Henkel, Director, Enterprise
More informationLease & Finance Accountants Conference. September The Westin Charlotte Charlotte, NC
Lease & Finance Accountants Conference September 11-13 The Westin Charlotte Charlotte, NC H A N D O U T S Credit losses (ASU 2016-13) Agenda Scope Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) Model Effective
More informationHarley-Davidson, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549 FORM 10-Q x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended
More information2018 Mid-Cycle Stress Test Disclosure
208 Mid-Cycle Stress Test Disclosure Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results JPMorgan Chase Severely Adverse Scenario October 26, 208 Table of contents Page 208 Mid-Cycle Stress Test JPMorgan Chase Severely
More informationCECL Static Pool White Paper
CECL Static Pool White Paper Introduction In this white paper, we offer an in-depth description of Visible Equity s Static Pool method for collectively reviewing loans in CECL. This method is a CECL-compliant
More informationCECL An Update & Bank Trends Demonstration
CECL An Update & Bank Trends Demonstration IBA 2019 Management Conference WEALTH ADVISORY OUTSOURCING AUDIT, TAX, AND CONSULTING Investment advisory services are offered through CliftonLarsonAllen Wealth
More informationCECL for Consumer Lending Portfolios: A Checklist
CECL for Consumer Lending Portfolios: A Checklist Deniz Tudor, PhD, Director, Consumer Credit Analytics David Fieldhouse, PhD, Director, Consumer Credit Analytics November 13, 2018 Agenda 1. Overview 2.
More informationBringing your data to life
Bringing your data to life Introducing: Ian Dunn isible Equity Elias Tuma Experian Bring your data to life Creating efficiencies through technology How can technology help to: Make data easier to obtain
More informationBB&T Corporation. Dodd-Frank Act Company-run Mid-cycle Stress Test Disclosure BB&T Severely Adverse Scenario
BB&T Corporation Dodd-Frank Act Company-run Mid-cycle Stress Test Disclosure BB&T Severely Adverse Scenario October 19, 2017 1 Introduction BB&T Corporation (BB&T) is one of the largest financial services
More informationSecurity Capital Assurance Ltd Structured Finance Investor Call. August 3, 2007
Security Capital Assurance Ltd Structured Finance Investor Call August 3, 2007 Important Notice This presentation provides certain information regarding Security Capital Assurance Ltd (SCA). By accepting
More informationStress Test Scenarios
Stress Test Scenarios Bank of Italy October 2018 The views expressed here are those of the author and do not represent the views of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 1 Stress Testing
More informationCECL expected to be released second quarter of 2016 Implementation
CECL expected to be released second quarter of 2016 Implementation Many of us in the financial institutions industry have been hearing about the new model to measure credit losses for months now and have
More informationCURRENT EXPECTED CREDIT LOSSES (CECL) BENCHMARKING SURVEY
CURRENT EXPECTED CREDIT LOSSES (CECL) BENCHMARKING SURVEY INTRODUCTION EXEC SUMMARY Surveying industry readiness for CECL We are pleased to present the results of our CECL survey, which assesses U.S. banks
More informationThe following information concerning Wells Fargo Bank s prior originations and purchases of Prime Adjustable-Rate Loans is included in this file:
The following information concerning Wells Fargo Bank s prior originations and purchases of Prime Adjustable-Rate Loans is included in this file: summary information regarding original characteristics
More informationDISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES DFAST 2016 Mid-cycle Public Disclosure of Stress Test Results October 6, 2016
DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES DFAST 2016 Mid-cycle Public Disclosure of Stress Test Results October 6, 2016 DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES DFAST 2016 Mid-cycle Public Disclosure of Stress Test Results TABLE
More informationAnnual Company-Run Stress Test Results
Wells Fargo & Company Annual Company-Run Stress Test Results Under the Supervisory Prescribed Severely Adverse Scenario June 21, 2018 Contents Overview... 3 Supervisory Severely Adverse Scenario Overview...
More informationPractical insights on implementing IFRS 9 and CECL
Practical insights on implementing IFRS 9 and CECL We are pleased to present the fourth publication in a series 1 that highlights Deloitte Advisory s point of view about the significance of the Financial
More informationThe FASB s upcoming rule change
The FASB s upcoming rule change Panelists: Rob Royall Partner Financial Accoun5ng Advisory Services - Ernst & Young LLP Ellen Billings North America Controller GM Financial Jim Bass Director of Vendor
More information