|
|
- Allen Harvey Lawson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Page 1 of 5 Register for the enewsletter Welcome Sandra. Not Sandra? Click here Contact Us Subscribe Now Forgot Your Password Imaging Trends and Advances Focus on Technology Viewpoints Conference Reports Search Magazines Resources Radiology Education Meetings Net Seminars
2 Page 2 of 5 January 2008 SEARCH Enter term(s) Go Medicare takes aim at self-referred imaging Anti-markup restrictions and limitations on scan leases top latest rule making moves from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services --Thomas W. Greeson, J.D. The regular fall update to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule is used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services each year to introduce new procedural codes, update the relative value units for all billing codes, and announce the new sustainable growth rate-mandated update (i.e., cut) in the conversion factor. But this annual rule making has taken on an even bigger role. The fee schedule update has also become the principal vehicle for CMS to promulgate new Medicare payment rules, including modifications to the Stark laws. This year's MPFS rules should prove to have a truly significant impact on imaging. The final rules make important changes to independent diagnostic testing facility (IDTF) performance standards and remove the profit in many technical and professional component diagnostic test agreements via a new "anti-markup" restriction. Although CMS deferred proposed action on most of the Stark rule changes published in its proposed rule, those proposals remain hovering in the wings. We can expect to see them made final some time early this year. In a surprise move, CMS announced at year-end that it was deferring most of its anti-markup restrictions until Jan. 1, The new rules make numerous modifications to IDTF performance standards, most beyond the scope of this column. One major new element of the performance standards will preclude most IDTFs from sharing space or equipment with any other Medicare-enrolled individual or entity. This means that lease deals by IDTFs with referring physicians are now barred outright. Fixed IDTFs that are located somewhere other than in a hospital building will now be precluded from entering into any type of arrangement with a physician, physician practice, or other entity that involves: subleasing the IDTF's office space and/or imaging equipment to a radiology group to perform interventional procedures; subleasing the IDTF's office space for a referring physician practice to establish a medical office location in the building; or offering even safe harbored block-time lease arrangements of the IDTF's office space and imaging equipment to physician practices. Although the regulations do not specifically state this, it appears that CMS is applying the "separate post office address" rule. If the IDTF and another Medicare-enrolled individual/entity are in space that has one post office address, then the two entities would be "sharing space." If, however, the two entities have different addresses, then they are not sharing space, even if they do share common hallways, reception area, or parking. In no event can the IDTF share
3 Page 3 of 5 its equipment. Recognizing that this new standard would require IDTFs currently engaged in actual office space sharing arrangements with physician groups to restructure, CMS has delayed the implementation date for existing IDTFs until Jan. 1, 2009, to provide them a full year to make changes. But any sublease agreement, however, is barred after Jan. 1, ANTI-MARKUP RULE Under Medicare's long-standing "purchased diagnostic test" rule, also referred to as the "anti-markup" rule, if a physician bills Medicare for the technical component of a diagnostic test performed by an outside supplier, the physician is prohibited from marking up the charges submitted to Medicare for the technical component services above what the physician paid to purchase the test. But application of the anti-markup provision has heretofore been quite limited, and it has been impotent in deterring most leasing arrangements. Nor has the rule previously applied to billings submitted for professional interpretation services. All that would have been changed by the new rule, and in a very meaningful way. The anti-markup rule, as drafted, has teeth. Register to Receive your free digital subscription to Enterprise Imaging & IT. Register Now Clearly, CMS has come to the realization that overutilization of diagnostic testing services may be escalating as ordering physicians seek profits from self-referral for imaging services. In response, the Medicare agency has expanded the anti-markup provision and its reassignment rules by broadening the application of the rule to more technical component test arrangements and by applying the prohibition on marking up charges to professional interpretation services. Here's how it works. Whenever the ordering physician either purchases technical or professional component services from an "outside supplier," or the technical or professional component testing services are performed at a site other than the "office" of the billing physician or other supplier, the anti-markup bar comes into place. These services can be billed by the ordering physician, but that physician or physician practice may not profit from that order. CMS did not define "ordering physician," but the clear meaning is one authorized to order a diagnostic test. An "outside supplier" is someone who is not an employee of the billing physician or other supplier and does not furnish the test or interpretation to the billing physician or other supplier under a reassignment. In other words, a part-time employee (or even an independent contractor) who reassigns his or her right to payment to the billing physician will not be deemed an outside supplier. The office of the billing physician is defined as "the medical office space where the physician or other supplier regularly furnishes patient care." The anti-markup provisions would have a profound impact on many arrangements. CMS has effectively removed the profit from many testing services contracted by self-referring physicians. The rule was crafted as an attack on "pod labs." Even many arrangements that comply with the "centralized location" or "same building" elements of the Stark in-office ancillary services exception will also be subject to billing rules that remove any profit from the arrangements. If the professional or technical component of a test is "performed at a site other than the office of the billing physician or supplier" it will be subject to anti-markup prohibition even if it's in a centralized location used exclusively by the billing group or even if performed in the same building but not in the office of the billing physician's group. The only feature of the new rule that CMS has allowed to go into effect in 2008 is the application of the restrictions on pod labs used by physician groups for anatomical pathology services. Thus, for example, if an orthopedic group with a full-time office in the same building as a radiology group's imaging center leased space, equipment, and personnel from the imaging center, the arrangement would be subject to the
4 Page 4 of 5 anti-markup rule, even when such a lease qualifies under the same building requirements of the Stark in-office ancillary services exception. This is a major blow to part-time leasing arrangements. And if the interpretation services were not performed in the orthopods' office, the professional component services would also have to be billed to Medicare at cost. In all events, the new rules require the billing physician group to disclose the identity of the outside supplier on the CMS 1500 claim form. The anti-markup rule requires that the billing group be paid the lesser of the fee schedule amount, the actual charge, or the "net charge" for the test. CMS received numerous comments requesting further guidance on how to determine the net charge when the performing supplier is paid on some basis other than per test or per interpretation (e.g., hourly, per diem, monthly). CMS responded that it is "leaving the responsibility for determining the net charge for a test with the billing supplier.... Suppliers must calculate the net charge in a reasonable manner." Should the rule go into effect in 2009, parties that enter into a purchased diagnostic test or interpretation arrangement that involves payment on some basis other than per test may expose themselves to unanticipated legal risk in the event CMS ever scrutinizes the claims submissions and disagrees with how the parties arrived at the supplier's net charge. STARK ONSITE REQUIREMENT Under the current Stark rules, the exception for professional interpretation services when the referring physician has an investment interest in the entity to which he or she refers and which bills for the Medicare/Medicaid service is the "physician services" exception available to physician group practices. When an independent contractor radiologist performs a Stark designated health service (DHS), such as the professional component of a radiology procedure, for a Medicare/Medicaid patient that is billed by the self-referring physician group practice, the physician services exception requires that the performance of DHS by the independent contractor radiologist must be provided on the group practice's premises. Under previous Stark requirements, if the contractor radiologist interpreted a study from a remote location for a Medicare or Medicaid patient who was referred by an investing physician, the independent contractor radiologist must have billed separately for the interpretation services provided, since the physician practice would have violated Stark if it billed for the services. CMS had amended its rules to make a technical correction to the definition of "entity" under the Stark regulations through the final rule to clarify that a physician or group practice does not make a referral to an "entity" and thus does not violate Stark when that physician or practice "bills Medicare for the technical or professional component of a diagnostic test for which the anti-markup provision is applicable in accordance with the appropriate provisions in the CMS Internet-Only Manual." In 2009, if an independent contractor radiologist performs reading services offsite from the referring physician's practice, the referring physician will nowwould be able to bill Medicare for the professional component services without violating Stark. Any claims submitted to the Medicare program for the independent contractor radiologist's services provided, however, will now be subject to the anti-markup prohibition. Thus, although the referring physician could bill for the offsite services without running afoul of the Stark rules, the referring physician cannot profit from those services to Medicare patients. Separate billing by the interpreting physician's group remains an option. Should the referring group contract with a local radiology group to read studies for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries
5 Page 5 of 5 onsite, those services may be reassigned to the referring physician group without application of the anti-markup requirement. Because Stark rules govern the arrangement, the independent contractor must have a direct contractual arrangement with the referring physician group pursuant to the new Stark II Phase III regulations. PROPOSED STARK REGULATIONS CMS declined to adopt as final the bulk of the other significant and controversial changes to the Stark rules it had earlier proposed via the MPFS rules. CMS reported that it received approximately 1100 comments in response to the proposed Stark changes. It apparently decided that, given the significance of the proposals and the volume of public comments they received, it was not prudent to finalize any of the other proposed changes to the Stark regulations. CMS noted, however, that because it received sufficient information both from the commenters and its own independent research, it intends to finalize revisions to the Stark regulations without requesting or providing any additional public comment period. My best guess is that we could see the next round of significant rulemaking that could have an impact on many imaging arrangements as early as March 2008.
Final Rule / 2008 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule
MEMORANDUM From: Thomas W. Greeson Direct Phone: 703.641.4242 Email: tgreeson@reedsmith.com From: Heather M. Zimmerman Direct Phone: 703.641.4352 Email: hzimmerman@reedsmith.com Reed Smith LLP 3110 Fairview
More informationPROPOSED STARK LAW REVISIONS COULD AFFECT MANY EXISTING BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN PHYSICIANS AND HOSPITALS AND OTHER PROVIDERS
PROPOSED STARK LAW REVISIONS COULD AFFECT MANY EXISTING BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN PHYSICIANS AND HOSPITALS AND OTHER PROVIDERS Publication PROPOSED STARK LAW REVISIONS COULD AFFECT MANY EXISTING BUSINESS
More informationImaging Centers: Avoiding Problems in Joint Ventures and Other Arrangements
Imaging Centers: Avoiding Problems in Joint Ventures and Other Arrangements Thomas E. Jeffry, Jr., Esq. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Los Angeles, CA www.hcca-info.org 888-580-8373 Hypothetical # 1 Slice PC,
More informationThe federal physician self-referral prohibition known as the
Business Law & Governance Navigating the Stark Law s Changing Landscape: Implications for Transactions Asha B. Scielzo, Esquire Travis F. Jackson, Esquire Thomas E. Dutton, Esquire Gerald M. Griffith,
More informationHealth Law Alert Medicare Physician Fee Schedule: Summary of Proposed Stark Law Changes. July 9, 2007
Health Law Alert July 9, 2007 Hall, Render, Killian, Heath & Lyman is a full service health law firm with offices in Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan and Wisconsin. Since the firm was founded by William S.
More informationRoll Up, Reverse, Sell or (?): Restructuring Alternatives for Imaging Centers July 20, 2018
Roll Up, Reverse, Sell or (?): Restructuring Alternatives for Imaging Centers July 20, 2018 W. Kenneth Davis, Jr. Partner KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP Disclosures NONE 1 Learning Objectives Be able to: Articulate
More informationIMAGING JOINT VENTURES REGULATORY ISSUES. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 1
IMAGING JOINT VENTURES REGULATORY ISSUES Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 1 The following presents an overview of certain antitrust, regulatory, and tax issues that should be considered in the planning process
More informationAnti-Kickback Statute Jess Smith
Anti-Kickback Statute Jess Smith Overview 1972 - Enacted 1977 - Violation became a felony 1996 - Expanded to include all Federal Health Care Programs 2009 - Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement
More informationUNDERSTANDING AND WORKING WITH THE LATEST STARK LAW DEVELOPMENTS
26 th Annual National CLE Conference Law Education Institute January 3-7, 3 2009 UNDERSTANDING AND WORKING WITH THE LATEST STARK LAW DEVELOPMENTS By JONELL B. WILLIAMSON January 5, 2009 1 Stark Prohibition
More informationStark Law Exceptions and Anti-Kickback Safe Harbors
Law Exceptions and Safe Harbors Price Reductions Offered to Health Plans [No comparable exception] Safe harbor for a reduction in price a contract health care provider offers to a health plan for the sole
More informationStark Law Exceptions and Anti-Kickback Safe Harbors
Law Exceptions and Safe Harbors Fair Market Value Compensation exception to the referral prohibition related to [No comparable safe harbor] compensation arrangements for fair market value compensation
More informationPHASE II OF THE FINAL STARK REGULATIONS: WHAT DO THEY MEAN FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
Kean Miller Health Care Industry Business Group PHASE II OF THE FINAL STARK REGULATIONS: WHAT DO THEY MEAN FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS April 28, 2004 Linda G. Rodrigue, Esq. and Clay J. Countryman, Esq. Kean,
More informationPhysician Lease Arrangements: New Rules
Physician Lease Arrangements: New Rules Presented by: Roger Clayton Peoria Office rclayton@heylroyster.com Greg Rastatter Peoria Office grastatter@heylroyster.com Tyler Robinson Springfield Office trobinson@heylroyster.com
More information2014 Lathrop & Gage LLP Lathrop & Gage LLP Lathrop & Gage LLP
Legal Issues for Physician Owned Implant Manufacturer/Distribution Companies (PODs) October 24, 2014 Randal L. Schultz, Esq. 10851 Mastin Blvd, Building 82, Suite 1000 Overland Park, KS 66210-1669 913.451.5192
More informationRUC Practice Expense Recommendations. Proposed Non- Facility
Summary of the Proposed Rule for the 2009 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule On June 30, 2008, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ( CMS ) released a notice proposing changes in the Medicare physician
More informationLaw Department Policy No. L-8. Title:
I. SCOPE: Title: Page: 1 of 13 This policy applies to (1) Tenet Healthcare Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliates (each, an Affiliate ); (2) any other entity or organization in which
More informationSummary of Presentation
Legal and Compliance Issues for Joint Venture Arrangements Robert A. Wade, Esq. Partner Baker & Daniels LLP bob.wade@bakerd.com 805 15th Street, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 312-7420 Christine
More informationProvider and Provider Relationships. Primary Fraud and Abuse Issues
Provider and Provider Relationships Primary Fraud and Abuse Issues This document is intended to identify the primary healthcare fraud and abuse laws that may apply to contractual relationships between
More informationSTARK II PHASE III: A Detailed Section-By-Section Analysis of the Long-Awaited Final Rule. Prepared by:
STARK II PHASE III: A Detailed Section-By-Section Analysis of the Long-Awaited Final Rule Prepared by: Crowell & Moring LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 202-624-2500 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationHospital Incentive Payments to Physicians for Quality and Cost Savings
Hospital Incentive Payments to Physicians for Quality and Cost Savings Implications under the Fraud and Abuse Laws March 1, 2011 Dennis S. Diaz Davis Wright Tremaine LLP dennisdiaz@dwt.com 213-633-6876
More informationHEALTH LAW NEWS. Proposed Changes to Independent Diagnostic Testing Facility Performance Standards. August 2007
WWW.KENNEDYCOVINGTON.COM HEALTH LAW NEWS Proposed Changes to Independent Diagnostic Testing Facility Performance Standards On July 12, 2007 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") published
More informationThis Health Law Update provides an overview of the Phase II Regulations, including certain key implications for the health care industry.
April 19, 2004 PHASE II OF THE FINAL STARK II REGULATIONS On March 26, 2004, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published Phase II of the final Stark II regulations (the Phase II Regulations),
More informationHCCA Compliance Institute Dallas, Texas Session 401- Monday, April 19, 2010
Take a Second Look at Your Physician Relationships: Tips Based on Experience and Changes in the Law HCCA Compliance Institute Dallas, Texas Session 401- Monday, April 19, 2010 Jana Kolarik Anderson, Attorney
More informationHancock, Daniel & Johnson, P.C., P.O. Box 72050, Richmond, VA , ,
Hancock, Daniel & Johnson, P.C., P.O. Box 72050, Richmond, VA 23255-2050, 804-967-9604, www.hancockdaniel.com 2018 Hancock, Daniel & Johnson P.C. hancockdaniel.com Fraud and Abuse Enforcement 1.Anti-kickback
More informationMedicare Releases Final Rule for the Second Year of the Quality Payment Program
Medicare Releases Final Rule for the Second Year of the Quality Payment Program On Nov. 2, 2017, CMS issued the Calendar Year 2018 Quality Payment Program (QPP) final rule for the second transition year
More informationImpact of Stark II, Phase II Regulations on Existing and Future Hospital/Physician Arrangements
Impact of Stark II, Phase II Regulations on Existing and Future Hospital/Physician Arrangements Health Care Provider Legal Issues Program WHA Annual Convention September 16, 2004 Michael Skindrud Godfrey
More informationFAST BREAK : STARK LESSONS FOR PHYSICIAN PRACTICE ACQUISITIONS Albert Shay, Eric Knickrehm, and Jake Harper August 23, 2018
FAST BREAK : STARK LESSONS FOR PHYSICIAN PRACTICE ACQUISITIONS Albert Shay, Eric Knickrehm, and Jake Harper August 23, 2018 2018 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Agenda What is the Stark Law and what kind of
More informationby Jana Kolarik Anderson, Marci Handler, David E. Matyas and Carrie Valiant
FY 2009 Inpatient Prospective Payment Final Rules Modifications to the Stark Law Regulations: Does Your Organization Need to Restructure Any Financial Relationships with Physicians? by Jana Kolarik Anderson,
More informationStark and the Anti Kickback Statute. Regulating Referral Relationship. February 27-28, HCCA Board Audit Committee Compliance Conference.
Stark and the Anti Kickback Statute Ryan Meade, JD, CHRC, CHC F Director, Regulatory Compliance Studies Beazley Institute for Health Law and Policy Loyola University Chicago School of Law rmeade@luc.edu
More informationMARSHALL L. MATZ MARK L. ITZKOFF *PRACTICE WITHIN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IS LIMITED TO MATTERS AND PROCEEDINGS BEFORE FEDERAL COURTS AND AGENCIES
PHILIP C. OLSSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW TISH E. PAHL RICHARD L. FRANK SUITE 400 ROBERT A. HAHN DAVID F. WEEDA (1948-2001) 1400 SIXTEENTH STREET, N.W. NAOMI J. L. HALPERN DENNIS R. JOHNSON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036-2220
More informationPHYSICIAN PRACTICES IN A STARK WORLD. David E. Matyas. A. The Statutory Prohibition (Social Security Act 1877; 42 U.S.C. 1395nn)
PHYSICIAN PRACTICES IN A STARK WORLD David E. Matyas I. OVERVIEW OF THE STARK LAW A. The Statutory Prohibition (Social Security Act 1877; 42 U.S.C. 1395nn) The federal physician self-referral statute prohibits
More informationLife Sciences Health Industry Group
If you have questions or would like additional information on the material covered in this Alert, please contact one of the authors, or the Reed Smith attorney with whom you regularly work: Heather M.
More informationCompliance in Physician Employment and Hospital- Physician Integration
Compliance in Physician Employment and Hospital- Physician Integration Winn W. Halverhout Husch Blackwell LLP Barbara A. Yosses Poudre Valley Health System Husch Blackwell LLP 1 Current Integration Structures
More informationPHASE I AND PHASE II STARK REGULATIONS
PHASE I AND PHASE II STARK REGULATIONS Summary of Interim final rules on Physicians Referrals to Entities to Which they have Financial Relationships (Stark II) The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Have Financial Relationships: Exception for Certain Electronic Health Records
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/27/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-30923, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
More informationInvestigator Compensation: Motivation vs. Regulatory Compliance
Vol. 12, No. 9, September 2016 Happy Trials to You Investigator Compensation: Motivation vs. Regulatory Compliance By Payal Cramer Physician-investigators play a central role in clinical research. Through
More informationFlorida Health Law Traps -
and Gassman Law Associates, P.A. present Lester Perling lperling@broadandcassel.com Alan S. Gassman agassman@gassmanpa.com Florida Health Law Traps - 5 Hypotheticals and Discussion of Important Medical
More informationStark Law Making the Confusion Understandable
Stark Law Making the Confusion Understandable Robert A. Wade Partner Krieg DeVault LLP 4101 Edison Lakes Parkway, Suite 100 Mishawaka, IN 46545 Telephone: 574-485-2002 Email: bwade@kdlegal.com Learning
More informationEnsuring Compliance with the Law - Properly Structuring Innovative Marketing and Creative Joint Ventures. Top 5 Things to Know for CE:
Ensuring Compliance with the Law - Properly Structuring Innovative Marketing and Creative Joint Ventures Clay Stribling, Esq. Top 5 Things to Know for CE: 1. Make sure your BADGE IS SCANNED each time you
More informationEnsuring Compliance with the Law - Properly Structuring Innovative Marketing and Creative Joint Ventures. Clay Stribling, Esq.
Ensuring Compliance with the Law - Properly Structuring Innovative Marketing and Creative Joint Ventures Clay Stribling, Esq. Top 5 Things to Know for CE: 1. Make sure your BADGE IS SCANNED each time you
More informationStark Self-Disclosure. Thomas S. Crane 1/ Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, PC
Stark Self-Disclosure Thomas S. Crane 1/ Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, PC A. Background 1. Stark Law The Physician Self-Referral Statute (or the Stark Law ) prohibits a physician from referring
More informationThere is nothing wrong with change, if it is in the right direction Winston Churchil
Changes Changes 2012 2012 There is nothing wrong with change, if it is in the right direction Winston Churchill New tools provided by the Affordable Care Act are strengthening the Obama administration
More informationMedicare Program; Request for Information Regarding the Physician Self-Referral Law. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/25/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-13529, and on FDsys.gov [Billing Code: 4120-01-P] DEPARTMENT
More informationHighlights from the proposed rule include the following:
Proposed Physician Fee Schedule for CY 2011: Initial Summary of Issues of Concern to ASCO Members On June 25, 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) displayed the proposed rule for
More informationAvoiding an October Surprise: Strategies for Complying with the New Stark Law Rules
Avoiding an October Surprise: Strategies for Complying with the New Stark Law Rules June 18, 2009 Presenters: Thomas E. Bartrum, Esq. Andy Lemons, Esq. The Expanding Scope of the Stark Law The Environment
More informationANCILLARY services: How to Stay Out of Trouble. The neurosurgical minefield Informed consent
ANCILLARY services: How to Stay Out of Trouble Richard N.W. Wohns, M.D. JD, MBA NeoSpine, Puget Sound Region, Washington The neurosurgical minefield 2013 Informed consent HIPAA ARRA and HITECH Anti-Kickback
More informationFraud and Abuse Compliance for the Health IT Industry
Fraud and Abuse Compliance for the Health IT Industry Session 89, March 6, 2018 James A. Cannatti III, Senior Counselor for Health Information Technology, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS),
More informationThe ABCs of Proper ABN Usage
The ABCs of Proper ABN Usage Addressing the Advance Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage under competitive bidding by Andrea Stark & Marshall Meringola Reprinted with permission from Homecare: www.homecaremag.com
More informationBuilding a Strategic Plan for Physician Employment and Practice Acquisition
Building Practice Acquisition and Physician Employment Strategies that Will Last the Test of Time In a Changing Regulatory Environment David Lewis Vice President/Associate General Counsel LifePoint Hospitals
More information855B Enrollment & Policy Overview
855B Enrollment & Policy Overview Joanne M. Lucas, J.D., Business Function Lead CMS Andrea King, Education Specialist Novitas September 2017 Session Overview Examine who should complete the CMS-855B Provide
More informationPhysician Relationship Compliance Issues
Physician Relationship Compliance Issues Charles Oppenheim Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC Overview of Anti-Kickback Statute It is a federal crime to: Knowingly and willfully offer or pay/solicit or receive
More informationPhysician Relationship Compliance Issues. Charles Oppenheim Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC
Physician Relationship Compliance Issues Charles Oppenheim Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC Overview of Anti-Kickback Statute It is a federal crime to: Knowingly and willfully offer or pay/solicit or receive
More informationOIG 125 N: Solicitation of New Safe Harbors and Special Fraud Alerts
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20004 2654 Tel: 202 783 8700 Fax: 202 783 8750 www.advamed.org By Electronic Submission via www.regulations.gov Ms. Patrice Drew Office of Inspector
More informationPhysician Contracts GOVERNANCE THOUGHT LEADERSHIP SERIES
Providing education, resources, leadership development to inspire excellence in health care governance. Hospitals regularly contract for many products and services ranging from the linens used in patient
More informationOhio Hospital Association 2014 Annual Meeting. Compensating Employed Physicians In An Evolving Health Care Environment
Ohio Hospital Association 2014 Annual Meeting June 10, 2014 Compensating Employed Physicians In An Evolving Health Care Environment Kimberly Mobley, Sullivan, Cotter and Associates, Inc., kimmobley@sullivancotter.com
More informationStark, AKS, FCA Primer
Stark, AKS, FCA Primer December 1, 2016 Christine Savage (csavage@choate.com, 617-248-4084) by any measure CHOATE HALL & STEWART LLP choate.com Physician Self-Referral Prohibition (the Stark Law ): History
More informationFY 2009 IPPS Rule. Recent Stark Developments. Recent Stark Developments. Edwin Rauzi Partner Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Seattle, WA
Don Romano Partner Arent Fox LLP Washington, D.C Edwin Rauzi Partner Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Seattle, WA Gadi Weinrich Partner Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal LLP Washington, D.C. 1 FY 2009 IPPS Rule
More informationMEDICARE PARTS C&D GENERAL COMPLIANCE AND FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE TRAINING
MEDICARE PARTS C&D GENERAL COMPLIANCE AND FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE TRAINING Jan 2018 WHY THIS TRAINING? The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requires Medicare Part C and Part D Sponsors (such
More informationApril 27, Dear Mr. Levinson:
Mr. Daniel Levinson, Inspector General Office of the Inspector General U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 300 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20201 Dear Mr. Levinson: We are writing
More informationFederal Fraud and Abuse Enforcement in the ASC Space
Federal Fraud and Abuse Enforcement in the ASC Space SCOTT R. GRUBMAN, ESQ. PARTNER CHILIVIS COCHRAN LARKINS & BEVER, LLP (ATLANTA GA) Fraud & Abuse Enforcement Landscape FBI CMS OCR MFCU DCIS DOJ HHS-OIG
More informationTelemedicine Agreements: FMV, Commercial Reasonableness Compliance in Compensation Arrangements
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Telemedicine Agreements: FMV, Commercial Reasonableness Compliance in Compensation Arrangements WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8, 2018 1pm Eastern 12pm Central
More informationAHLA. B. What s Up with Rev. Proc Brenda S. Horn Ice Miller LLP Indianapolis, IN. Elizabeth M. Mills Proskauer Rose LLP Chicago, IL
AHLA B. What s Up with Rev. Proc. 97-13 Brenda S. Horn Ice Miller LLP Indianapolis, IN Elizabeth M. Mills Proskauer Rose LLP Chicago, IL Tax Issues for Health Care Organizations October 19-21, 2014 What
More informationStark/Anti- Kickback Fundamentals
Stark/Anti- Kickback Fundamentals HEALTHCON Business Expo April 2016 Presented by: Stacy Harper, JD, MHSA, CPC 1 Disclaimer This presentation is for general education purposes only. The information contained
More informationPREVENTION, DETECTION, AND CORRECTION OF FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE
1 of 9 PREVENTION, DETECTION, AND CORRECTION OF FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE 1. Purpose The purpose of this policy is to articulate commitment by Kaiser Permanente Hawaii Region to control fraud, waste and abuse
More informationOverview of Phase III Final Rule for Federal Physician Self-Referral (Stark) Law. Table of Contents
Overview of Phase III Final Rule for Federal Physician Self-Referral (Stark) Law Table of Contents I. General Comments and Definitions ( 411.351)... 1 Anti-Kickback Law Requirement... 1 Employee... 1 Entity...
More informationThe Anesthesia Company Model: Frequently Asked Questions
The Anesthesia Company Model: Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is the situation in Florida? Florida-specific Issues For several years, FSA members have been contacting the society with reports of company
More informationTHE SPECIAL EDITION. Introduction
THE ABA HEALTH LAW SECTION THE HEALTH LAWYER SPECIAL EDITION SPECIAL EDITION APRIL 2004 STARK II - PHASE II - THE FINAL VOYAGE Andrew B. Wachler, Esq. Adrienne Dresevic, Esq. Karen K. Harris, Esq. Wachler
More informationMedicare Reimbursement Information
Introduction to CodeMap Online A Comprehensive Medicare Resource CodeMap Online includes Medicare fee schedules, coverage policies, CCI and MUE edits, and valuable utilization data that can answer all
More informationAnti-Kickback Statute and False Claims Act Enforcement
Anti-Kickback Statute and False Claims Act Enforcement Nicholas Gachassin, III, Esq. Gachassin Law Firm, LLC Nick3@gachassin.com Press Conference on Health Care Fraud and the Affordable Care Act May 13,
More informationMedicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training
Medicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training IMPORTANT NOTE All persons who provide health or administrative services to Medicare enrollees must satisfy FWA training requirements. This module
More informationPURCHASING INTERNET LEADS: SURE, IT CAN BE DONE, BUT BE VERY CAREFUL. Denise Leard, Esq Brown & Fortunato, P.C.
PURCHASING INTERNET LEADS: SURE, IT CAN BE DONE, BUT BE VERY CAREFUL Denise Leard, Esq. 2017 Brown & Fortunato, P.C. INTRODUCTION 2 INTRODUCTION There is an increase in utilization of durable medical equipment
More informationHealth Law 101: Issue-Spotting In Dealing With Health-Care Providers. by William H. Hall Jr.
Health Law 101: Issue-Spotting In Dealing With Health-Care Providers by William H. Hall Jr. The anti-kickback statute prohibits arrangements that might be common in other industries. Health care is among
More informationLegislative & Regulatory Issues Facing Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. Ronald L. Weiss, MD
Legislative & Regulatory Issues Facing Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Ronald L. Weiss, MD Learning Objectives 1. Describe the key elements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 which
More informationFraud, Waste and Abuse: Compliance Program. Section 4: National Provider Network Handbook
Fraud, Waste and Abuse: Compliance Program Section 4: National Provider Network Handbook December 2015 2 Our Philosophy Magellan takes provider fraud, waste and abuse We engage in considerable efforts
More informationRELIEF FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS? PROPOSED STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE RULE INCLUDES IMPORTANT (POTENTIAL) EXCEPTIONS [OBER KALER]
RELIEF FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS? PROPOSED STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE RULE INCLUDES IMPORTANT (POTENTIAL) EXCEPTIONS Publication RELIEF FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS? PROPOSED STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE RULE INCLUDES
More informationHealth Care Pricing: Establishing Fees, Discounts, Charging Interest, Out-of- Network Arrangements and Other Issues
Health Care Pricing: Establishing Fees, Discounts, Charging Interest, Out-of- Network Arrangements and Other Issues By: David M. Glaser 612.492.7143 dglaser@fredlaw.com February 2016 Pricing There are
More informationUnitedHealthcare Medicare Advantage Reimbursement Policy CMS 1500 Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction (MPPR) for Therapy Services Policy
Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction (MPPR) for Therapy Services Policy Policy Number Annual Approval Date 3/14/2018 Approved By Oversight Committee IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THIS REIMBURSEMENT POLICY This
More informationPI Compensation: Methods, Documentation, and Execution
PI Compensation: Methods, Documentation, and Execution David B. Russell, CRCP Director, Site Strategy Liz Christianson Client engagement manager PFS CLINICAL 2018 PharmaSeek Financial Services, LLC d.b.a.
More informationPI Compensation: Methods, Documentation, and Execution
PI Compensation: Methods, Documentation, and Execution David B. Russell, CRCP Director, Site Strategy Liz Christianson Client engagement manager PFS CLINICAL 2018 PharmaSeek Financial Services, LLC d.b.a.
More informationADVANCE BENEFICIARY NOTICE OF NONCOVERAGE
ADVANCE BENEFICIARY NOTICE OF NONCOVERAGE Administrative Consultant Service, LLC CMS Guidelines for Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) June 1, 2012 Inside this issue: Revisions to ABN Guidelines Medical
More informationPhysician Rockstars Toolkit - Common Models and Legal Considerations for Securing the Services of Rockstar physicians. Item 3
(1) Employment Agreements Stark Exception Requirements 1 42 U.S.C. 1395nn(e)(2)/ 42 CFR 411.357(c) There is a bona fide employment relationship and the employment is for identifiable services. The amount
More informationCurrent Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Fraud, Waste and Abuse
Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: 2397820 Policy Scope: Date Of Origin: 06/2015 Last Approved: 07/2016 Last Revised: 07/2016 Next Review: 07/2018 Sponsor: Policy Area: Regulatory Tags: Applicability:
More informationFAQ Results. Date: 2/24/2010. Send To Printer. Question #8663: Are service fees included in the Average Sale Price (ASP) calculation?
FAQ Results Please be advised that these FAQs were generated from a database that is updated frequently. For the most up-to-date information, please visit http://questions.cms.hhs.gov. Date: 2/24/2010
More informationCompensation Paid by Healthcare Providers
Compensation Paid by Healthcare Providers Physician compensation continues to be an especially important issue due to extensive integration of medical practices into larger healthcare systems and the severe
More informationCOMMERCIAL REASONABLENESS AND FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS WITH PHYSICIANS
COMMERCIAL REASONABLENESS AND FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS WITH PHYSICIANS Daniel H. Melvin, Partner, McDermott Will & Emery, in consultation with Daryl Johnson, Managing Partner, Health Care Appraisers, Inc.
More information7/25/2018. Government Enforcement in the Clinical Laboratory Space. The Statutes & Regulations. The Stark Law. The Stark Law.
Government Enforcement in the Clinical Laboratory Space 2 SCOTT R. GRUBMAN, ESQ. The Statutes & Regulations 3 4 AKA the physician self-referral law The Rule: If physician (or immediate family member) has
More informationAuditing Physician Arrangements
Tuesday, October 24, 2017 1:00 P.M.- 2:30 P.M. Eastern Auditing Physician Arrangements Presented by: Allison Carty, JD, MBA Director Pinnacle Healthcare Consulting acarty@askphc.com Joseph N. Wolfe, Attorney/Shareholder
More informationMichael F. Schaff, Esq.
AMERICAN HEAL TH LAWYERS ASSOCIATION ANNUAL MEETING June 26 & 28, 2006 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania "UNDER ARRNGEMENT" HOSPITAL-PHYSICIAN VENTURES: STILL ANOTHER WAY TO COOPERATE? Michael F. Schaff, Esq.
More informationValuation of Health Care Entity Property or Services Transfers
Health Care Valuation Insights Valuation of Health Care Entity Property or Services Transfers Robert F. Reilly, CPA Health care providers comply with a myriad of professional regulations. Health care providers
More informationAdjunct Professional Services Policy
Policy Number 2017R7114C Adjunct Professional Services Policy Annual Approval Date 11/9/2018 Approved By Reimbursement Policy Oversight Committee IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THIS You are responsible for submission
More informationAdult Preventive Medicine Clinical Coverage Policy No.: 1A-2 Annual Health Assessment Amended Date: October 1, 2015.
Table of Contents 1.0 Description of the Procedure, Product, or Service... 1 1.1 Definitions... 1 2.0 Eligibility Requirements... 1 2.1 Provisions... 1 2.1.1 General... 1 2.1.2 Specific... 1 2.2 Special
More informationPractical Considerations for Medical Practices Considering Converting Their Vascular Access Centers Into Medicare-Certified Ambulatory Surgery Centers
Practical Considerations for Medical Practices Considering Converting Their Vascular Access Centers Into Medicare-Certified Ambulatory Surgery Centers James B. Riley, Partner +1 312 750 8665 jriley@mcguirewoods.com
More informationAnti-Kickback Statute: Are Per-Patient Referral Fee Arrangements Permissible?
REFERRAL COMPENSATION GREGORY S. SAIK.IN/NATHANIEL C. KUMMERFELD* Anti-Kickback Statute: Are Per-Patient Referral Fee Arrangements Permissible? Federal Judge's Decision in United States v. Crinel Allows
More informationDeveloped by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Issued: February, 2013
Medicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training and General Compliance Training Developed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Issued: February, 2013 Important Notice This training module
More informationCMS Part D UPDATES. Kim Brandt Director, Program Integrity Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
CMS Part D UPDATES Kim Brandt Director, Program Integrity Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Regulatory Changes - 42 CFR Parts 422 and 423 Outline of the presentation: I. Regulatory changes that
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RL32494 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Medicare: Physician Self-Referral ( Stark I and II ) July 27, 2004 Jennifer O Sullivan Specialist in Social Legislation Domestic
More informationPayment Adjustments & Hardship Exceptions Tipsheet for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012
Overview Payment Adjustments & Hardship Exceptions Tipsheet for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012 As part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), Congress mandated
More informationStructuring Physician Timeshare Arrangements: Leveraging the New Stark Exception, Navigating the Limitations
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Physician Timeshare Arrangements: Leveraging the New Stark Exception, Navigating the Limitations THURSDAY, APRIL 28, 2016 1pm Eastern
More informationFrequently Asked Questions Radiology Management Program
Frequently Asked Questions Radiology Management Program Neighborhood Health Plan of Rhode Island (Neighborhood) has implemented a prior authorization program with MedSolutions. This will include clinical
More informationTo Merge or Not to Merge: The Business and Legal Issues When Radiology Groups Combine with Other Groups
To Merge or Not to Merge: The Business and Legal Issues When Radiology Groups Combine with Other Groups October 13, 2009 W. Kenneth Davis, Jr. Partner Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Disclosure: NONE Session
More information