1 The Rotten Kid Theorem
|
|
- Ashlee Grant
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ACE 501 Fall, 2007 Comments on Gibbons problem 2.1 The Rotten Kid Theorem Carl H. Nelson 9/7/07 1 The Rotten Kid Theorem The Rotten Kid Theorem that you proved in problem set 2 is an important insight in family economics and incentive theory that was first stated by Becker [1]. Stated in words, if a family has a head who cares sufficiently about all other members to transfer general resources to them, then redistribution of income among members [of the household] would not affect the consumption of any member, as long as the head continues to contribute to all. That is, if such a head exists other family members are motivated to make choices that maximize family income, even if their welfare depends on their own consumption alone. This is what you proved in problem set 2. This is an amazing result, which should become much clearer when we study contracting. Contracting theory is a large literature because it is hard to create incentives for selfish agents to take actions that benefit the group, especially when the agents have unobserved actions or attributes. The Rotten Kid theorem says that selfish kids will take actions that benefit the family if a benevolent head exists. This doesn t even require any form of pre-commitment by the head. The family of such a head will have no free riders or principal-agent problems. This is an important insight in family economics. It is an insight that provides understanding of the distinction between a family and the general economic organizations analyzed in incentive theory. But, it is not a general theorem that holds for all specifications of utility. A more formal analysis of Becker s insight was provided by Bergstrom [2]. I will give you a summary of some of his analysis. A general statement of the theorem is the following. Given a family of n members, where each members consumption of a single consumption good, X, is X i. Let the head s utility be: U(X 1, X 2,..., X n ) 1
2 Let I i be the income of family member i before transfers occur. Then the family budget constraint is: X i = I i i i Then if the head is making transfers to family members the distribution of consumption is the one that maximizes the utility of the head subject to the budget constraint. Given that each of the X i s is a normal good for the head, each X i will be an increasing function of income. Thus any child who has the ability to increase total family income will do so, even if it means reducing his own pretransfer income. Bergstrom begins by providing an example that demonstrates that the Rotten Kid theorem fails to apply when there is asymmetric information. He calls this example the Lazy rotten kid. Let the income of each family member be an increasing function of their time and effort working, Y i, I i = I(Y i ). Let each childs utility depend on consumption, X i, and let leisure be measured by 1 Y i. Suppose that the head can observe income, but not time and effort working. This breaks the incentives created by the transfer from the head. Then a selfish child will not choose effort to maximize family income because because he does not receive the marginal product of effort, but the marginal product times the head s marginal propensity to spend on him. But, it turns out the the Rotten Kid theorem does not hold, even if the head can observe the effort of selfish children. Assume there are two children with utility functions: And assume the head s utility is: U i = X i (1 Y i ) U 0 = U 1/2 1 + U 1/2 2 = X 1/2 1 (1 Y 1 ) 1/2 + X 1/2 2 (1 Y 2 ) 1/2 Assume each child earns income I i = wy i (Note, this means that the head knows Y i if he observes I i.) The head will make transfers to maximize utility subject to the constraint: X 1 + X 2 = I 0 + wy 1 + wy 2 The maximum occurs when: X 1 = (1 Y 1) X 2 (1 Y 2 ) Note, that this means that each child s share of consumption is a decreasing function of his own work effort. Thus each child s incentive to work is pointed in the direction opposite the direction needed to maximize family income. 2
3 Consider another variation of the Rotten Kid theorem that Becker insightfully comments on. There is a husband who wants to read at night, but the light bothers his wife. The husband loves his wife and gives her consumption goods. He is aware that the light bothers his wife, and his love for her causes him to read less than he would otherwise. But he still uses the night-light more than his wife would like. One day when the husband is absent, an electrician offers to disconnect the night-light in such a way that the husband would think it was an accident and would not be able to fix it. Becker claims that even though the wife is selfish and dislikes the night-light, she will not take up the electricians offer. His reasoning is that the husband will be worse off if the electrician disconnects the night-light. This effect is a loss of family income. If the wife s utility is a normal good for the husband, this loss of income will cause the husband to reduce his gifts of consumption goods, so the wife s utility would be lower after the night-light is disconnected. Bergstrom subjects this provocative explanation of the incentive effects of altruism to formal analysis. Let the altruistic husband s utility function be U h (u h (x h, y), u w (x w, y)) where u h (x h, y) is increasing in both arguments, and u w (x w, y) is increasing in x w and decreasing y. Let U h (u h, u w ) = u h u a w, where 0 < a < 1, and u h (w h, y) = x h (1 + y) and u w (x w, y) = x w e y. Thus, the husband chooses x h, x w, y to maximize: U h = x h x a w(1 + y)e ay subject to: x h + x w = I The solution reveals that the husband will distribute income so that x w = ai/(1 + a). So income distribution is independent of night-light, y. Thus the husband will choose y = (1/a) 1 > 0. But the wife would choose y = 0 if she could because her utility is decreasing in y. Thus the wife would take the electrician s offer. This is a case where attaining a Pareto optimal allocation of the public good, y, requires explicit bargaining over the allocation of y. What is the common problem in these examples that causes the incentives of the Rotten Kid theorem to break down? It is the existence of the second commodity. You can see this by considering the utility possibility frontier in the second example. We can solve for this by making x h and x w explicit functions of u h and u w and substituting the solutions into the budget constraint to obtain: u h 1 + y + u we y = I 3
4 We can see that for a given value of y this is linear in u h and u w. Changes in y will change the location and slope of the utility possibility frontier. This frontier will be most favorable to the wife when y = 0. The same is true of the lazy rotten kid. He can commit himself to an action before the head chooses an incentive scheme. The kid will choose inefficient actions that distort the utility possibility frontier in his favor. Bergstrom proves that there must be conditional transferable utility in order for the subgame perfect equilibrium to be Pareto optimal. He further proves that in order for this to happen every agent must have a utility function of the form: u i (m i, a) = A(a)m i + B i (a) This is a form of utility that allows utility to be transferred through m i. So the technical Rotten Kid theorem is much more restrictive than Becker s provocative claims. But Bergstrom acknowledges that the theorem is at least as useful as a heuristic generator of insight as it is as a formal proposition...the richness of insight that Becker has to offer about the economics of the family is only partially captured in formal analysis of the Rotten Kid theorems. Many insights into the economics of the family and the economics of incentives that have escaped formal treatment in this paper are to be found in Becker s discussion and examples in the Treatise on the Family and in his 1974 article. After Bergstrom s analysis, Cornes and Silva [4] claimed to prove that the utility restriction identified by Bergstrom could be relaxed if all children provide a pure public good. Formally, they claim that if all children provide a pure public good, such that their first order conditions have interior solutions, then the firstorder conditions will always satisfy Pareto optimality. Unfortunately, Chiappori and Werning [3] showed that interior solutions can be reached in a very limited set of cases, one of which is the frequently used case of pure symmetry. References [1] Gary S. Becker. A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6): , [2] Theodore C. Bergstrom. A fresh look at the rotten kid theorem and other household mysteries. Journal of Political Economy, 97(5): , [3] Pierre-Andre Chiappori and Ivan Werning. Rotten kids, purity, and perfection: Comment. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2):475 80,
5 [4] Richard C. Cornes and Emilson C. D. Silva. Rotten kids, purity, and perfection. Journal of Political Economy, 107(5): ,
Inside the Household
Inside the Household Spring 2016 Inside the Household Outline for Today I model II Evidence on : Lundberg, Pollak and Wales III Evidence on : Duflo IV Cooperative models V Noncooperative models VI Evidence
More informationSamaritan vs Rotten Kid: Another Look
Samaritan vs Rotten Kid: Another Look Bouwe R. Dijkstra University of Nottingham January 2002 Abstract. We set up a two-stage game with sequential moves by one altruistic agent and n selfish agents. The
More informationAnswers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)
Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, 2016 1. In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average) cost. To investigate the consequences of markup pricing,
More informationGovernmental Transfers Can Reduce a Moral Hazard Problem
Governmental Transfers Can Reduce a Moral Hazard Problem Amihai Glazer Department of Economics University of California, rvine rvine, California 9697 USA USA Hiroki Kondo Department of Economics Sophia
More informationReuben Gronau s Model of Time Allocation and Home Production
Econ 301: Topics in Microeconomics Sanjaya DeSilva, Bard College, Spring 2008 Reuben Gronau s Model of Time Allocation and Home Production Gronau s model is a fairly simple extension of Becker s framework.
More informationStatic and Intertemporal Household Decisions
Static and Intertemporal Household Decisions Pierre-Andre Chiappori and Maurizio Mazzocco Current Draft, September 2015. Abstract We discuss the most popular static and dynamic models of household behavior.
More informationTheoretical Tools of Public Finance. 131 Undergraduate Public Economics Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley
Theoretical Tools of Public Finance 131 Undergraduate Public Economics Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley 1 THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL TOOLS Theoretical tools: The set of tools designed to understand the mechanics
More informationAn Equitable, Efficient, and Implementable Scheme to Control Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Applied Economics Faculty Publications Applied Economics 007 An Equitable, Efficient, and Implementable Scheme to Control Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions Arthur
More informationECON 301: General Equilibrium V (Public Goods) 1. Intermediate Microeconomics II, ECON 301. General Equilibrium V: Public Goods
ECON 301: General Equilibrium V (Public Goods) 1 Intermediate Microeconomics II, ECON 301 General Equilibrium V: Public Goods In our last discussion on externality, we found that as long as property rights
More informationExchange. M. Utku Ünver Micro Theory. Boston College. M. Utku Ünver Micro Theory (BC) Exchange 1 / 23
Exchange M. Utku Ünver Micro Theory Boston College M. Utku Ünver Micro Theory (BC) Exchange 1 / 23 General Equilibrium So far we have been analyzing the behavior of a single consumer. In this chapter,
More information1 Two Period Exchange Economy
University of British Columbia Department of Economics, Macroeconomics (Econ 502) Prof. Amartya Lahiri Handout # 2 1 Two Period Exchange Economy We shall start our exploration of dynamic economies with
More informationDo Government Subsidies Increase the Private Supply of Public Goods?
Do Government Subsidies Increase the Private Supply of Public Goods? by James Andreoni and Ted Bergstrom University of Wisconsin and University of Michigan Current version: preprint, 1995 Abstract. We
More informationEcon 2230 Course description. Econ 2230: Public Economics. Econ 2230 Course requirements. Public economics / public finance
Econ 2230 Course description Survey course of topics in public economics Part of two course sequence constituting the public economics field for grad students t in the economics department t Econ 2230:
More informationHW Consider the following game:
HW 1 1. Consider the following game: 2. HW 2 Suppose a parent and child play the following game, first analyzed by Becker (1974). First child takes the action, A 0, that produces income for the child,
More informationPh.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017
Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017 The time limit for this exam is four hours. The exam has four sections. Each section includes two questions.
More informationFirst Welfare Theorem in Production Economies
First Welfare Theorem in Production Economies Michael Peters December 27, 2013 1 Profit Maximization Firms transform goods from one thing into another. If there are two goods, x and y, then a firm can
More informationWhen Was Coase Right?
Abstract The Coase theorem asserts that in the absence of transaction costs, parties to an externality will bargain to an efficient outcome. It also claims that the resulting level of externality-generating
More informationMicroeconomics II. CIDE, MsC Economics. List of Problems
Microeconomics II CIDE, MsC Economics List of Problems 1. There are three people, Amy (A), Bart (B) and Chris (C): A and B have hats. These three people are arranged in a room so that B can see everything
More informationAggregation with a double non-convex labor supply decision: indivisible private- and public-sector hours
Ekonomia nr 47/2016 123 Ekonomia. Rynek, gospodarka, społeczeństwo 47(2016), s. 123 133 DOI: 10.17451/eko/47/2016/233 ISSN: 0137-3056 www.ekonomia.wne.uw.edu.pl Aggregation with a double non-convex labor
More informationA Closed Economy One-Period Macroeconomic Model
A Closed Economy One-Period Macroeconomic Model Chapter 5 Topics in Macroeconomics 2 Economics Division University of Southampton February 21, 2008 Chapter 5 1/40 Topics in Macroeconomics Closing the Model
More informationChoice. A. Optimal choice 1. move along the budget line until preferred set doesn t cross the budget set. Figure 5.1.
Choice 34 Choice A. Optimal choice 1. move along the budget line until preferred set doesn t cross the budget set. Figure 5.1. Optimal choice x* 2 x* x 1 1 Figure 5.1 2. note that tangency occurs at optimal
More informationDistribution of Wealth and Interdependent Preferences
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 3684 Distribution of Wealth and Interdependent Preferences Andrew Grodner Thomas J. Kniesner September 008 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the
More informationEcon 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.
Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013. Do not turn the page until instructed to. Do not forget to write Problems 1 in the first Blue Book and Problems 2, 3 and 4 in the second Blue Book. 1 Econ 101A Final
More informationSection 9, Chapter 2 Moral Hazard and Insurance
September 24 additional problems due Tuesday, Sept. 29: p. 194: 1, 2, 3 0.0.12 Section 9, Chapter 2 Moral Hazard and Insurance Section 9.1 is a lengthy and fact-filled discussion of issues of information
More informationTrade Agreements and the Nature of Price Determination
Trade Agreements and the Nature of Price Determination By POL ANTRÀS AND ROBERT W. STAIGER The terms-of-trade theory of trade agreements holds that governments are attracted to trade agreements as a means
More informationChapter 3 Introduction to the General Equilibrium and to Welfare Economics
Chapter 3 Introduction to the General Equilibrium and to Welfare Economics Laurent Simula ENS Lyon 1 / 54 Roadmap Introduction Pareto Optimality General Equilibrium The Two Fundamental Theorems of Welfare
More information2.6 Putting the Tools to Work the Effect of Temporary Assistance Programs on the Budget Constraint
Module 2 Lecture 4 Topics 26 Putting the Tools to Work the Effect of Temporary Assistance Programs on the Budget Constraint 27 Budget Constraint 28 The Effect of Temporary Assistance Programs on the Budget
More informationd. Find a competitive equilibrium for this economy. Is the allocation Pareto efficient? Are there any other competitive equilibrium allocations?
Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 7, 0. Consider an individual faced with two job choices: she can either accept a position with a fixed annual salary of x > 0 which requires L x units of labor
More informationEconomics 101A (Lecture 24) Stefano DellaVigna
Economics 101A (Lecture 24) Stefano DellaVigna April 23, 2015 Outline 1. Walrasian Equilibrium II 2. Example of General Equilibrium 3. Existence and Welfare Theorems 4. Asymmetric Information: Introduction
More informationSEPARATION OF THE REDISTRIBUTIVE AND ALLOCATIVE FUNCTIONS OF GOVERNMENT. A public choice perspective
Journal of Public Economics 24 (1984) 373-380. North-Holland SEPARATION OF THE REDISTRIBUTIVE AND ALLOCATIVE FUNCTIONS OF GOVERNMENT A public choice perspective Marilyn R. FLOWERS The University of Oklahoma,
More informationUCLA Department of Economics Ph. D. Preliminary Exam Micro-Economic Theory
UCLA Department of Economics Ph. D. Preliminary Exam Micro-Economic Theory (SPRING 2016) Instructions: You have 4 hours for the exam Answer any 5 out of the 6 questions. All questions are weighted equally.
More informationPublic Economics Tax distorsions
Public Economics Tax distorsions I. Ortuño 2015 Public Economics () distorsions 2015 1 / 15 Distorsions AGZ 2.1. and Stiglitz. pg 488, and notes in Aula Global Public Economics () distorsions 2015 2 /
More informationMicro-economic theories of fertility: Quantity and Quality
Micro-economic theories of fertility: Quantity and Quality Economic Demography Econ/Demog 175 Prof. Goldstein UC Berkeley Week 8, Lecture B Spring 2018 1 Last time Fixed cost per child Children were considered
More informationAnswers To Chapter 7. Review Questions
Answers To Chapter 7 Review Questions 1. Answer d. In the household production model, income is assumed to be spent on market-purchased goods and services. Time spent in home production yields commodities
More informationEstate Taxation, Social Security and Annuity: the Trinity and Unity?
Estate Taxation, ocial ecurity and Annuity: the Trinity and Unity? Nick L. Guo Cagri Kumru December 8, 2016 Abstract This paper revisits the annuity role of estate tax and the optimal estate tax when bequest
More informationDepartment of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. August 2010
Department of Agricultural Economics PhD Qualifier Examination August 200 Instructions: The exam consists of six questions. You must answer all questions. If you need an assumption to complete a question,
More informationEconS Advanced Microeconomics II Handout on Social Choice
EconS 503 - Advanced Microeconomics II Handout on Social Choice 1. MWG - Decisive Subgroups Recall proposition 21.C.1: (Arrow s Impossibility Theorem) Suppose that the number of alternatives is at least
More informationDepartment of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 8712
Prof. Peck Fall 016 Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Questions and Answers Econ 871 1. (35 points) The following economy has one consumer, two firms, and four goods. Goods 1
More informationUniversity at Albany, State University of New York Department of Economics Ph.D. Preliminary Examination in Microeconomics, June 20, 2017
University at Albany, State University of New York Department of Economics Ph.D. Preliminary Examination in Microeconomics, June 0, 017 Instructions: Answer any three of the four numbered problems. Justify
More informationECON 3020 Intermediate Macroeconomics
ECON 3020 Intermediate Macroeconomics Chapter 5 A Closed-Economy One-Period Macroeconomic Model Instructor: Xiaohui Huang Department of Economics University of Virginia c Copyright 2014 Xiaohui Huang.
More informationChapter 5. A Closed- Economy One-Period Macroeconomic. Model. Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter 5 A Closed- Economy One-Period Macroeconomic Model Copyright Chapter 5 Topics Introduce the government. Construct closed-economy one-period macroeconomic model, which has: (i) representative consumer;
More informationIntermediate public economics 5 Externalities Hiroaki Sakamoto
Intermediate public economics 5 Externalities Hiroaki Sakamoto June 12, 2015 Contents 1. Externalities 2.1 Definition 2.2 Real-world examples 2. Modeling externalities 2.1 Pure-exchange economy a) example
More informationStatic and Intertemporal Household Decisions
Static and Intertemporal Household Decisions Pierre-Andre Chiappori and Maurizio Mazzocco Current Draft, July 2014. Chiappori: Columbia University, Department of Economics. Mazzocco: University of California
More informationCorporate Control. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Corporate Control Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 Managerial Discipline and Takeovers Managers often don t maximize the value of the firm; either because they are not capable
More informationProblems. the net marginal product of capital, MP'
Problems 1. There are two effects of an increase in the depreciation rate. First, there is the direct effect, which implies that, given the marginal product of capital in period two, MP, the net marginal
More informationLecture 5 Leadership and Reputation
Lecture 5 Leadership and Reputation Reputations arise in situations where there is an element of repetition, and also where coordination between players is possible. One definition of leadership is that
More informationThe Collective Model of Household : Theory and Calibration of an Equilibrium Model
The Collective Model of Household : Theory and Calibration of an Equilibrium Model Eleonora Matteazzi, Martina Menon, and Federico Perali University of Verona University of Verona University of Verona
More informationExploring the Effect of Wealth Distribution on Efficiency Using a Model of Land Tenancy with Limited Liability. Nicholas Reynolds
Exploring the Effect of Wealth Distribution on Efficiency Using a Model of Land Tenancy with Limited Liability Nicholas Reynolds Senior Thesis in Economics Haverford College Advisor Richard Ball Spring
More informationEconomics 230a, Fall 2014 Lecture Note 9: Dynamic Taxation II Optimal Capital Taxation
Economics 230a, Fall 2014 Lecture Note 9: Dynamic Taxation II Optimal Capital Taxation Capital Income Taxes, Labor Income Taxes and Consumption Taxes When thinking about the optimal taxation of saving
More informationTHEORETICAL TOOLS OF PUBLIC FINANCE
Solutions and Activities for CHAPTER 2 THEORETICAL TOOLS OF PUBLIC FINANCE Questions and Problems 1. The price of a bus trip is $1 and the price of a gallon of gas (at the time of this writing!) is $3.
More informationDepartment of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Answers Econ 8712
Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Answers Econ 872 Prof. Peck Fall 207. (35 points) The following economy has three consumers, one firm, and four goods. Good is the labor/leisure
More information1 Two Period Production Economy
University of British Columbia Department of Economics, Macroeconomics (Econ 502) Prof. Amartya Lahiri Handout # 3 1 Two Period Production Economy We shall now extend our two-period exchange economy model
More informationECON 340/ Zenginobuz Fall 2011 STUDY QUESTIONS FOR THE FINAL. x y z w u A u B
ECON 340/ Zenginobuz Fall 2011 STUDY QUESTIONS FOR THE FINAL 1. There are two agents, A and B. Consider the set X of feasible allocations which contains w, x, y, z. The utility that the two agents receive
More informationComparative Study between Linear and Graphical Methods in Solving Optimization Problems
Comparative Study between Linear and Graphical Methods in Solving Optimization Problems Mona M Abd El-Kareem Abstract The main target of this paper is to establish a comparative study between the performance
More informationOther Regarding Preferences
Other Regarding Preferences Mark Dean Lecture Notes for Spring 015 Behavioral Economics - Brown University 1 Lecture 1 We are now going to introduce two models of other regarding preferences, and think
More informationWelfare Economics. Jan Abrell Centre for Energy Policy and Economics (CEPE) D-MTEC, ETH Zurich. Welfare Economics
Welfare Economics Jan Abrell Centre for Energy Policy and Economics (CEPE) D-MTEC, ETH Zurich Welfare Economics 06.03.2018 1 Outline So far Basic Model Economic Efficiency Optimality Market Economy Partial
More informationLecture 12: Public goods
Lecture 12: Public goods Economics 336 Economics 336 (Toronto) Lecture 12: Public Goods 1 / 18 Introduction What s wrong with this picture? Snow removal creates benefits for others not valued by payors
More informationMathematical Economics dr Wioletta Nowak. Lecture 2
Mathematical Economics dr Wioletta Nowak Lecture 2 The Utility Function, Examples of Utility Functions: Normal Good, Perfect Substitutes, Perfect Complements, The Quasilinear and Homothetic Utility Functions,
More informationGame Theory. Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari. Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India October 2012
Game Theory Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India October 22 COOPERATIVE GAME THEORY Correlated Strategies and Correlated
More informationGeneral Equilibrium and Economic Welfare
General Equilibrium and Economic Welfare Lecture 7 Reading: Perlo Chapter 10 August 2015 1 / 61 Introduction Shocks a ect many markets at the same time. Di erent markets feed back into each other. Today,
More informationJEFF MACKIE-MASON. x is a random variable with prior distrib known to both principal and agent, and the distribution depends on agent effort e
BASE (SYMMETRIC INFORMATION) MODEL FOR CONTRACT THEORY JEFF MACKIE-MASON 1. Preliminaries Principal and agent enter a relationship. Assume: They have access to the same information (including agent effort)
More informationChapter 2 Equilibrium and Efficiency
Chapter Equilibrium and Efficiency Reading Essential reading Hindriks, J and G.D. Myles Intermediate Public Economics. (Cambridge: MIT Press, 005) Chapter. Further reading Duffie, D. and H. Sonnenschein
More informationNot 0,4 2,1. i. Show there is a perfect Bayesian equilibrium where player A chooses to play, player A chooses L, and player B chooses L.
Econ 400, Final Exam Name: There are three questions taken from the material covered so far in the course. ll questions are equally weighted. If you have a question, please raise your hand and I will come
More informationRamsey taxation and the (non?)optimality of uniform commodity taxation. Jason Lim and Sam Hinds
Ramsey taxation and the (non?)optimality of uniform commodity taxation Jason Lim and Sam Hinds Introduction (I/II) In this presentation we consider the classic Ramsey taxation problem of maximising social
More informationFinal Examination December 14, Economics 5010 AF3.0 : Applied Microeconomics. time=2.5 hours
YORK UNIVERSITY Faculty of Graduate Studies Final Examination December 14, 2010 Economics 5010 AF3.0 : Applied Microeconomics S. Bucovetsky time=2.5 hours Do any 6 of the following 10 questions. All count
More informationA. Introduction to choice under uncertainty 2. B. Risk aversion 11. C. Favorable gambles 15. D. Measures of risk aversion 20. E.
Microeconomic Theory -1- Uncertainty Choice under uncertainty A Introduction to choice under uncertainty B Risk aversion 11 C Favorable gambles 15 D Measures of risk aversion 0 E Insurance 6 F Small favorable
More informationTools of normative analysis
Tools of normative analysis Lecture 2 1 Welfare economics Need of tools to evaluate desirability of alternative policies ( states of the world ) WE helpful to understand when markets work or fail Microeoconomic
More informationDiscussion of Optimal Monetary Policy and Fiscal Policy Interaction in a Non-Ricardian Economy
Discussion of Optimal Monetary Policy and Fiscal Policy Interaction in a Non-Ricardian Economy Johannes Wieland University of California, San Diego and NBER 1. Introduction Markets are incomplete. In recent
More informationCV and EV. Measuring Welfare Effects of an Economic Change. ECON 483 ST in Environmental Economics
CV and EV Measuring Welfare Effects of an Economic Change ECON 483 ST in Environmental Economics Kevin Wainwright Welfare and Economic Change Welfare is, in simple terms, the level of well-being of a group.
More information(Note: Please label your diagram clearly.) Answer: Denote by Q p and Q m the quantity of pizzas and movies respectively.
1. Suppose the consumer has a utility function U(Q x, Q y ) = Q x Q y, where Q x and Q y are the quantity of good x and quantity of good y respectively. Assume his income is I and the prices of the two
More informationFundamental Theorems of Welfare Economics
Fundamental Theorems of Welfare Economics Ram Singh October 4, 015 This Write-up is available at photocopy shop. Not for circulation. In this write-up we provide intuition behind the two fundamental theorems
More informationA simple proof of the efficiency of the poll tax
A simple proof of the efficiency of the poll tax Michael Smart Department of Economics University of Toronto June 30, 1998 Abstract This note reviews the problems inherent in using the sum of compensating
More information14.03 Fall 2004 Problem Set 2 Solutions
14.0 Fall 004 Problem Set Solutions October, 004 1 Indirect utility function and expenditure function Let U = x 1 y be the utility function where x and y are two goods. Denote p x and p y as respectively
More informationDARTMOUTH COLLEGE, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS ECONOMICS 21. Dartmouth College, Department of Economics: Economics 21, Summer 02. Topic 5: Information
Dartmouth College, Department of Economics: Economics 21, Summer 02 Topic 5: Information Economics 21, Summer 2002 Andreas Bentz Dartmouth College, Department of Economics: Economics 21, Summer 02 Introduction
More informationConvergence of Life Expectancy and Living Standards in the World
Convergence of Life Expectancy and Living Standards in the World Kenichi Ueda* *The University of Tokyo PRI-ADBI Joint Workshop January 13, 2017 The views are those of the author and should not be attributed
More informationChapter 1 Microeconomics of Consumer Theory
Chapter Microeconomics of Consumer Theory The two broad categories of decision-makers in an economy are consumers and firms. Each individual in each of these groups makes its decisions in order to achieve
More informationChapter 7 Review questions
Chapter 7 Review questions 71 What is the Nash equilibrium in a dictator game? What about the trust game and ultimatum game? Be careful to distinguish sub game perfect Nash equilibria from other Nash equilibria
More informationModule 2 THEORETICAL TOOLS & APPLICATION. Lectures (3-7) Topics
Module 2 THEORETICAL TOOLS & APPLICATION 2.1 Tools of Public Economics Lectures (3-7) Topics 2.2 Constrained Utility Maximization 2.3 Marginal Rates of Substitution 2.4 Constrained Utility Maximization:
More informationPROBLEM SET 6 ANSWERS
PROBLEM SET 6 ANSWERS 6 November 2006. Problems.,.4,.6, 3.... Is Lower Ability Better? Change Education I so that the two possible worker abilities are a {, 4}. (a) What are the equilibria of this game?
More informationAnswer: Let y 2 denote rm 2 s output of food and L 2 denote rm 2 s labor input (so
The Ohio State University Department of Economics Econ 805 Extra Problems on Production and Uncertainty: Questions and Answers Winter 003 Prof. Peck () In the following economy, there are two consumers,
More informationReview of Production Theory: Chapter 2 1
Review of Production Theory: Chapter 2 1 Why? Trade is a residual (EX x = Q x -C x; IM y= C y- Q y) Understand the determinants of what goods and services a country produces efficiently and which inefficiently.
More informationEconomics Honors Exam Review (Micro) Mar Based on Zhaoning Wang s final review packet for Ec 1010a, Fall 2013
Economics Honors Exam Review (Micro) Mar. 2017 Based on Zhaoning Wang s final review packet for Ec 1010a, Fall 201 1. The inverse demand function for apples is defined by the equation p = 214 5q, where
More informationTrade on Markets. Both consumers' initial endowments are represented bythesamepointintheedgeworthbox,since
Trade on Markets A market economy entails ownership of resources. The initial endowment of consumer 1 is denoted by (x 1 ;y 1 ), and the initial endowment of consumer 2 is denoted by (x 2 ;y 2 ). Both
More informationWhat are the additional assumptions that must be satisfied for Rabin s theorem to hold?
Exam ECON 4260, Spring 2013 Suggested answers to Problems 1, 2 and 4 Problem 1 (counts 10%) Rabin s theorem shows that if a person is risk averse in a small gamble, then it follows as a logical consequence
More informationEconomics 451 Exam 1 Spring 2014 Prof Montgomery. Answer all questions. 100 points possible. Explanations can be brief.
Economics 45 Exam Spring 204 Prof Montgomery Answer all questions. 00 points possible. Explanations can be brief. ) [30 points] Following Becker s analysis of the household division of labor, consider
More informationEconomics 230a, Fall 2014 Lecture Note 7: Externalities, the Marginal Cost of Public Funds, and Imperfect Competition
Economics 230a, Fall 2014 Lecture Note 7: Externalities, the Marginal Cost of Public Funds, and Imperfect Competition We have seen that some approaches to dealing with externalities (for example, taxes
More informationChapter 23: Choice under Risk
Chapter 23: Choice under Risk 23.1: Introduction We consider in this chapter optimal behaviour in conditions of risk. By this we mean that, when the individual takes a decision, he or she does not know
More informationMicroeconomic Theory May 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program.
Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2013 *********************************************** COVER SHEET ***********************************************
More informationInternational Economics Lecture 2: The Ricardian Model
International Economics Lecture 2: The Ricardian Model Min Hua & Yiqing Xie School of Economics Fudan University Mar. 5, 2014 Min Hua & Yiqing Xie (Fudan University) Int l Econ - Ricardian Mar. 5, 2014
More informationMicro-foundations: Consumption. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko
Micro-foundations: Consumption Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko 1 / 74 Why Study Consumption? Consumption is the largest component of GDP (e.g., about 2/3 of GDP in the U.S.) 2 / 74 J. M. Keynes s Conjectures
More informationThe Robinson Crusoe model; the Edgeworth Box in Consumption and Factor allocation
Econ 200B UCSD; Prof. R. Starr, Ms. Kaitlyn Lewis, Winter 2017; Notes-Syllabus I1 Notes for Syllabus Section I: The Robinson Crusoe model; the Edgeworth Box in Consumption and Factor allocation Overview:
More informationOptimal Progressivity
Optimal Progressivity To this point, we have assumed that all individuals are the same. To consider the distributional impact of the tax system, we will have to alter that assumption. We have seen that
More informationGame Theory Fall 2003
Game Theory Fall 2003 Problem Set 5 [1] Consider an infinitely repeated game with a finite number of actions for each player and a common discount factor δ. Prove that if δ is close enough to zero then
More informationGame Theory Fall 2006
Game Theory Fall 2006 Answers to Problem Set 3 [1a] Omitted. [1b] Let a k be a sequence of paths that converge in the product topology to a; that is, a k (t) a(t) for each date t, as k. Let M be the maximum
More informationSam Bucovetsky und Andreas Haufler: Preferential tax regimes with asymmetric countries
Sam Bucovetsky und Andreas Haufler: Preferential tax regimes with asymmetric countries Munich Discussion Paper No. 2006-30 Department of Economics University of Munich Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
More informationChapter 4 Specific Factors and Income Distribution
Chapter 4 Specific Factors and Income Distribution Introduction If trade is so good for the economy, why is there such opposition? Two main reasons why international trade has strong effects on the distribution
More informationEconomics 742 Homework #4
Economics 742 Homework #4 May 4, 2009 Professor Scholz Please turn in your answers to the following questions in class on Monday, May 4. Each problem is worth 40 points, except where noted. You can work
More informationTest 2 March 24, 2010 Chapters 25 and 5-9
Test 2 March 24, 2010 Chapters 25 and 5-9 Name There are 15 multiple choice questions which are worth 2 points each for a total of 30 points. The 8 short answer questions are 10 points each. You choose
More informationEcon 551 Government Finance: Revenues Winter 2018
Econ 551 Government Finance: Revenues Winter 2018 Given by Kevin Milligan Vancouver School of Economics University of British Columbia Lecture 3: Excess Burden ECON 551: Lecture 3 1 of 28 Agenda: 1. Definition
More informationCONSUMPTION THEORY - first part (Varian, chapters 2-7)
QUESTIONS for written exam in microeconomics. Only one answer is correct. CONSUMPTION THEORY - first part (Varian, chapters 2-7) 1. Antonio buys only two goods, cigarettes and bananas. The cost of 1 packet
More information