ECSEL JU Moving Forward in 2016

Transcription

1 ECSEL JU Moving Forward in 2016 Bert De Colvenaer Executive Director Torino, 22 March

2 Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership a Public-Private Partnership Keeping Europe at the Forefront of Technology Development Established by the Council Regulation (EU) No 561/2014 2

3 Implement Horizon 2020: Develop favourable conditions for investing in knowledge and innovation Achieve smart, sustainable and inclusive growth PPP-model with 3-way funding The European Union (1.17B, via EC/H2020) The ECSEL Participating States (>1.17B ) The Private Members (~ 5B minus grants) Build upon ARTEMIS/ENIAC JU experience and achievements 3

4 Executive Director Public Authorities Board Private Members Board OFFICE 4

5 Union Body, Legal Personality, 4 Bodies: Governing Board ECSEL Members (Public Authorities, Private Members) Strategic orientation, supervises implementation Approves MultiAnnual Strategic Plan (MASP), Work Plan (WP), rules, membership, budget, staff, communication policy Executive Director Programme Office Public Authorities Board European Commission, ECSEL Participating States Private Members Board AENEAS, ARTEMIS-IA, EPoSS Chief Executive, legal representation Consolidates Multi Annual Strategic Plan and Financial Perspectives, elaborates budget proposal, Work Plan, executes calls; monitors projects Representatives of the Public Authorities Approves call launching, call rules, allocates funding Defines research agenda Elaborates the multiannual strategic research and innovation agenda (MASRIA) and the annual research and innovation activities plan (RIAP) 5

6 Strategy for ECS: Without a state of the art technological infrastructure, Europe will be dependent on importation Without functionality provided by the embedded software, the chips are useless and the fabs are economically unsustainable Without integrating components in smart systems, it is impossible to capture the economic benefits on the end user markets ENIAC + ARTEMIS + EPoSS = ECSEL 6

7 Multi Annual Strategic Plan (MASP) Work Plan (WP) MASP MASRIA + RIAP WP Produced by the ECSEL Industry Associations ECSEL JU Office Adopted by ECSEL JU Governing Board 7

8 8

9 ... Because ELECTRONICS matters to everyone! The ECSEL Strategy 9

10 Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine. 10

11 Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine. Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine. Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine. Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine. Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine. Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine. WAFERS Wafer manufacturing - Processes - Materials -... MM MtM M/NEMS Devices Libraries... CHIPS IC assembly and test Unit-level integration Sensors/Actuators Packaging Connectivity SOFTWARE Wireless Interconnect End User Applications systems IC design Characterisation Qualification HW Architectures PCB design Non-functional characteristics TOOLS! Middleware Operating Systems System design System Security modelling V&V Certification Page : 11

12 Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine. 119 proj, 4 B costs, 650 M EU, 875 M MS, >1K participants, 40% SMEs Participation 12

13 ECSEL ARTEMIS/ENIAC JU funding rates = % of H2020, tailored to beneficiary types (LE, SME, Unif) and type of Action (IA, RIA) Only one funding rate: 15% (ENIAC), 16,7% (Artemis) regardless the type of actions or beneficiary JU funding supplementing National funding JU funding supplementing National funding JU funding payment pace independent from NGAs signature JU funding payment dependent from NGAs signature Cost recognition follows H2020 rules and cost categories (Italian funding authority applies H2020 cost categories) Cost recognition follows national rules and national eligibility criteria (e.g. in Italy dissemination, management and travel costs are not eligible costs) 13

14 ECSEL call 2014 Submitted: 34 RIA, 14 IA Retained for grant: 6 RIA, 6 IA RIA success rate: 17,6% IA success rate: 42,9% ECSEL call 2015 Submitted: 51 RIA, 11 IA Retained for grant: 8 RIA, 5 IA RIA success rate: 15,7% IA success rate: 45,5% ECSEL JU average success rate*: 23% (16,7% RIA, 44,2% IA) FP7 ARTEMIS average success rate: 26% FP7 ENIAC average success rate: 46% * calls 14

15 15

16 ,3 18, ,5 13, ,4 7 6,6 7,5 18, , , ,5 2 2,9 0,6 call 2008 call 2009 call 2010 call 2011 call 2012 call 2013 call 2014 call 2015 call 2016 Estimate ARTEMIS Italian funding (Meuro) ENIAC Italian funding (M ) ECSEL Italian funding (M ) ENIAC+ARTEMIS EU funding (M ) ECSEL EU funding (M ) 16

17 2 calls x 2 phase, in parallel ECSEL (RIA) Industrial/Applied Research project TRL 3-4 ECSEL (IA) Experimental development projects TRL 5-8 Lighthouse Initiatives as a separate, parallel action Call Published: March 15 th 2016 PO deadline : May 24 th 2016 FPP deadline : September 20 th 2016 Funding decision : Target End November

18 EVALUATIONS jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug sep oct nov dec ECSEL Brokerage Strasbourg Call open March 15 PO Deadline May 24 FPP Deadline September 20 Funding decision ECSEL Call Forum Brussels ECSEL Stakeholders Forum ECSEL Events Date / Place ECSEL Brokerage event 27-28/01 Strasbourg ECSEL Call Forum 3 May, Brussels ECSEL Stakeholders Forum Late October, Brussels 18

19 RIA IA EU/ECS EL 65 M 85 M IT 18.5 M All MS About 160 M 19

20 Type RIA IA For profit (non SME) 25% 20% SME 30% 25% University/Other 35% 35% EU Contribution as % of the eligible cost according to H2020 (beneficiaries may ask for a lower contribution)national contributions: see Annex of the Work Plan 20

21 ECSEL JU Lighthouse Initiatives Build on well identified market-pull related to societal needs, with a strong pan- European dimension Create ecosystems along the relevant value and supply chains, where appropriate: Working towards clustering of projects Having a strategic IP management policy Establishing a standardization strategy Addressing the relevant non-technical aspects (legislative, regulatory, social,...) 21

22 Similar to the ECSEL Consortium Building Event Brussels Sheraton Airport Hotel Date: 3 May 2016 Agenda: Update Call info, submission,... Facilitate proposal consolidation and partner engagement Focus on Networking - Breakout & Poster Session 22

23 H2020 Participant Portal: Online manual for H2020: funding-guide/index_en.htm User guide for the submission tool: Annotated JU GA: 0-amga_en.pdf For questions on any aspect of grant applications and the EU Research Framework Programmes, including beneficiary registration and data updates, please refer to the : For any IT-related problems that you might experience with the Submission system, please contact the : Our website (specific webpage with links to documents and actualized information): Questions specific to ECSEL:calls@ecsel.europa.eu 23

24 Register your company (PIC number) Use the portal to register your proposal (coordinator) Proposal consists of: Part A: consortium information including financial information (cost, funding) Part B: Pdf with technical description Part C: Country specific information required (specific for ECSEL) 24

25 Budget according to H2020 rules Budget according to national rules x% of DC JU Funding 25% of DC Indirect cost Other direct cost Equipment, Travel Materials, etc Direct cost: Subcontracting Direct cost: Personnel National Funding 25

26 If activities with costs are funded through ESI funds, then those activities cannot obtain ECSEL JU funding. Various possibilities to include activities funded by ESI funds described in Guide for Applicants Main issue: no overlap Risk mitigation: what happens if the activity does not get the ESI funding? ECSEL JU team is available to advice 26

27 Selection of projects Submission of Full Project Proposal Admissibility and JU eligibility check Evaluation by experts Score of proposals (under/above threshold) Selection in PAB, funding, synergy with EU and national policies Final ranking GAP Signature of JU GA PAB decision on change requests Handling of change requests Communication to coordinator 4-5 months 3 months 27

28 Thank you for your attention! 28