Equitable and Efficient International Schemes to Control Carbon Dioxide Emissions
|
|
- Grant Greer
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Equitable and Efficient International Schemes to Control Carbon Dioxide Emissions Arthur J. Caplan Department of Economics John B. Goddard School of Business and Economics Weber State University Ogden, Utah and Emilson C.D. Silva Department of Economics Tulane University New Orleans, LA September 12, 2000 Abstract: We examine three noncooperative global warming games where carbon dioxide emissions and transfers are determined. An international agency implements transfers from rich to poor nations. In each game, the transfer mechanism obeys a predetermined equity principle horizontal, proportional or green GNP. Participation in each transfer scheme is voluntary. We find that implementable horizontal and proportional equity schemes are Pareto efficient. The green equity scheme, however, is generally inefficient. Unlike the others, our proposed proportional equity scheme is necessarily implementable all nations always choose to participate. We conclude that proportional equity transfer schemes may be powerful instruments in controlling global warming. JEL Classification: C72, D62, D78, H41, H77, Q28. Acknowledgements: Caplan thanks the John B. Goddard School of Business for summer research support which led to the completion of this manuscript.
2 1 1. Introduction The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, completed December 10, 1997, will probably be remembered most for its innovative use of emissions trading to control global greenhouse gas emissions. 1 However, it will also be remembered for the promulgation of another type of incentive: international transfers between rich and lower-income nations. 2 As stated in Article 12 of the protocol, transfers should be used as a means to: (1) provide new and additional financial resources to meet the agreed full costs incurred by [lower-income] countries in advancing the implementation of existing commitments, and (2) provide such financial resources, including for the transfer of technology, needed by [lower-income] countries to meet the agreed full incremental costs of advancing the implementation of existing commitments. It is, therefore, apparent that there will be a significant amount of resources transferred from rich to poor nations and that the implementation of international transfer schemes will have tremendous effects on the allocation of global resources. Such international transfers may provide rich and poor nations with incentives to efficiently abate their carbon dioxide emissions. 1 That emissions trading is a cost-effective means of controlling pollution is not much in debate. The theory behind its use is generally clear, simple, and favorable: compared to command-and-control policies, such as uniform quotas, emissions trading induces firms to obtain the same aggregate level of control at lower total cost (c.f. Tietenberg, 1992; Hanley, et al., 1997). Moreover, similar types of marketable permit programs in the U.S. used to control water, lead, and air pollution, have proven effective (Hahn, 1989; Stavins, 1998). All told, an impressive amount of research and experience underscores the benefits and costs associated with emissions trading programs (see Maloney and Yandle (1984), Coggins and Swinton (1996), Burtraw (1996), and references therein). 2 The protocol also introduces a third market mechanism to control greenhouse gas emissions, known as clean development mechanisms (see Article 11). We examine the efficiency properties of this mechanism in a separate paper.
3 2 In this paper, we examine how rich and poor nations allocate their resources when they anticipate that transfers will be made from rich to poor nations in order to satisfy a particular equity principle. We investigate the efficiency properties of international transfers that emerge from voluntary participation of rich and poor nations in three types of international schemes designed to induce the nations to control carbon dioxide emissions. Each scheme obeys a specific equity principle, namely, horizontal equity, proportional equity and green equity. Under horizontal equity, the amount of the transfer effected follows from a condition that equates utilities of representative residents of rich and poor nations. This is undoubtedly an extreme form of international justice, but it provides a useful benchmark for future comparisons. Under proportional equity, the transfer is determined by a condition that preserves the status-quo relative ranking of international welfare levels: the welfare of rich and poor nations are equated as proportions of their respective reservation welfare levels. Under green equity, the transfer is derived from a condition that equates green GNP s across rich and poor nations. 3 Interestingly, we find that rich and poor nations efficiently curb their carbon dioxide emissions whenever they participate in the transfer schemes that obey horizontal and proportional equity principles. However, under green equity, both types of nations find it desirable to emit more than the efficient level of carbon dioxide. The Kyoto Protocol s promotion of international transfers as a means to reduce global carbon dioxide emissions is apparently a step in the right direction. As Sandler (1997) points out, the control of global warming requires stronger effort to bring about collective action than 3 For a comprehensive discussion of various green GNP measures presently in use, see Hamilton and Lutz (1996) and World Bank (1999).
4 3 that required to control other types of regional and global externalities, such acid rain and CFC emissions. For example, both the Helsinki Protocol (1985) to control sulfur emissions and the Sofia Protocol (1988) to control nitrogen oxide emissions merely codified reductions that the parties had either already independently implemented or were soon to achieve (Murdoch, Sandler, and Sargent, 1997). Similarly, the Montreal Protocol (1987) to control CFC emissions did not impose any new constraints on its signatories. Rather, the protocol served to legitimize the strategically chosen status quo (Murdoch and Sandler, 1997). Primarily because the benefits of curbing their carbon dioxide emissions are greatly outweighed by the associated costs, nations independently have less incentive to abate. Incentives such as transfers are therefore more likely to be effective in controlling global warming. It may not be difficult to implement some of the international transfer schemes studied in this paper. There are already several international schemes that transfer resources from rich to poor nations. Despite the well-documented decline in foreign aid among OECD-member nations (measured as percentages of GDP over time), poverty-reduction remains a primary objective of this aid (OECD, 1995 and 1996). In addition, the widespread movement toward debt relief for poor nations points up the fact that official foreign aid statistics tend to underestimate the extent of transfers taking place between rich and poor nations (Phillips, 1999). Controlling global warming, therefore, may provide yet another rationale for international transfers. In fact, the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which represents the supreme body of the Convention, has delegated the responsibility of operating the Convention s financial mechanism to the Global Environment Facility (GEF). The GEF was established in 1990 by the World Bank, the United Nations
5 4 Development Programme (UNDP), and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). The role of the convention s mechanism is to transfer funds and technology from rich to poor nations. The GEF, however, lacks political and economical powers to design and enforce international mechanisms to control emissions of carbon dioxide. In other words, the GEF is not capable of punishing regions that do not comply with international standards. The interregional transfers implemented by the GEF are redistributive, namely, they are effected after the regions choose their own environmental actions. Perhaps the best method of measuring the strength of international equity constraints is to track changes in the ratio of green GNP s across regions over time. For example, a 1994 World Bank (1999) estimate of the ratio of aggregate green GNP between South American, Central American, African, and Asian nations on the one hand, and North American, Pacific OECD, and Western European nations on the other is approximately Transfers from the latter group of nations might therefore be targeted toward either maintaining or perhaps increasing this ratio over time. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces the basic model and examines both Pareto efficiency and the Nash equilibrium in absence of transfers. Section 3 explores the efficiency properties of three transfer schemes, horizontal equity, proportional equity and green equity. Section 4 concludes the study with a brief summary of our findings. 2. The Model We assume two coalitions of countries indexed r (rich) and p (poor), respectively, where countries are identical within a coalition. We further assume that population sizes across the
6 5 coalitions are equal and normalized to one, so that a representative agent s utility may also be interpreted as regional welfare. Regional welfare is expressed as U j = U(x j, y j ), j = r, p (1) where x j represents a good whose production results in carbon dioxide emissions, and y j represents a non-carbon dioxide-producing good (e.g. an agricultural good), which will serve as our numeraire good. We assume that U is increasing in both arguments, quasiconcave and twice continuously differentiable. Given normalized populations and equalized rates of diffusion and absorption, we assume that the total flow of carbon dioxide emissions, G, is given by G = j x j = x r + x p. (2) Region j s resource constraint is as follows: (3) where the unit of the industrial good is chosen so that its price equals 1. While on the left-hand side of (3) we have the region j s consumption expenditure, on the right-hand side we have the region s net income. The quantity I j > 0 represents region j s exogenously-given initial endowment in absence of carbon dioxide emissions. We assume that each unit of carbon dioxide emitted depletes the region j s endowment at a rate j (0, 1), so that region j s net income equals I j j G. We assume that 1 > p > r in order to capture the common belief that a greater proportion of poor nations are more sensitive than rich nations to the negative effects of global warming, as a result of both geographic location and economic structures (Poterba, 1993). For future reference, it is important to note that the terms I j j G, j = r,p represent the respective
7 6 regions green GNP s, since these quantities should equal the regions national incomes net of damages caused by the global externality. 4 By adding the individual resource constraints, we obtain the global resource constraint: (4) A Pareto efficient allocation can be determined by choosing {x j, y j,; j = r,p} in order to maximize U r subject to (2), (4) and U p = K, where K > 0 is some constant. By varying K, we can derive the entire Pareto frontier. In addition to (4) and U p = K, the first order conditions that characterize the Pareto efficient allocation are as follows: 5 (5) Equations (5) show that the marginal rates of substitution left-hand side should be set equal to the common marginal social rate of transformation right-hand side. The marginal social rate of transformation between industrial and agricultural goods is the sum of the added 4 This is an obvious abstraction from how green GNP is actually defined for individual nations. For instance, degradation of the environment due to local externalities and the depletion of non-renewable natural resources is also netted out of the standard GNP measure in calculating a nation s green GNP or genuine savings measures (see Hamilton and Lutz, 1996). However, holding constant these types of more localized deletions from GNP, our representation of green GNP allows for an accurate measure of the global externality s relative effects on initial endowments. 5 Throughout the paper, we assume that interior and locally unique solutions and that the first order conditions are not only necessary but also sufficient for a maximum.
8 7 value of agricultural good forgone and of the (negative) externality effects on available resources in each region. For the purpose of comparison, consider the simultaneous Nash game played by rich and poor regions in absence of international transfers. In this game, region j independently chooses {x j, y j } in order to maximize U j, subject to (2) and (3). The resulting first order conditions for the Nash equilibrium without transfers are as follows: (6) Equations (6) indicate that the regions equate their marginal rates of substitution to their respective private marginal rates of transformation, rather than the social marginal rate. This follows because the regions neglect the external effects of their carbon dioxide emissions. This fact provides a rationale for some form of intervention to improve global welfare. Let U j0 denote the utility level obtained by region j in the simultaneous Nash equilibrium. In what follows, this will represent region j s reservation utility level. It is important to note that 0 since I r - r G > I p - p G, U r > U p0. See Figure 1. [INSERT FIGURE 1 HERE] 3. International Equity Constraints Henceforth, let denote the amount of nonnegative income, in terms of the numeraire good, that is transferred from the rich region to the poor region in order to satisfy a predetermined equity principle. These transfer instruments are controlled by an international
9 8 agency, say the Global Environment Facility (GEF). In the presence of international income transfers, we obtain the following resource constraints for the rich and poor regions, respectively: (7a) and (7b) Our benchmark equity principle is horizontal equity. Under horizontal equity, the rich region transfers income to the poor region in an amount that equates regional welfare levels (i.e., U r = U p ). This is an extreme form of equity, which might be feasible when initial resource endowments are approximately equal across regions. Under proportional equity, the transfer amount follows from equalization of the proportions of regional welfare levels to respective noncooperative Nash welfare levels (i.e., U r / U r0 = U p / U p0 ). Finally, under green equity, the transfer is determined so as to equate regional green GNP s. Transfers are implemented by the GEF after the regions choose their resource allocations. We postulate that each region s participation in the transfer scheme is voluntary. To be implementable, the transfer scheme must satisfy participation constraints for both regions, namely, it must provide each nation with a utility level that it is at least as large as each nation s reservation utility level. The games examined below are three-stage games (see, e.g., Caplan, et al. (1999), Caplan and Silva (1999) and Silva and Caplan (1997) for examples of similar multistage games involving transboundary externalities). In the first stage of each game, both regions decide whether or not to participate in the particular transfer mechanism. In the second
10 9 stage of the game, the rich region chooses x r while the poor region chooses x p, taking the choices of each other as given. In the third stage of each game, the GEF determines the amount of the transfer that should be implemented in order to satisfy the underlying equity principle. Both regions anticipate the transfer and its effects on resource allocation when they move in the first two stages of the game. The games are solved by backward induction, and the equilibrium concept used is subgame perfect equilibrium. 3.1 Horizontal Equity In the third stage of this game, the GEF chooses {y j, ; j = r,p} to maximize U r subject to (7a), (7b) and U r = U p, taking {x j, j = r,p} as given. It is important to note that since the agricultural good is our numeraire and income is measured in terms of the numeraire, the transfer instruments essentially endow the GEF with the ability of determining the allocation of the total endowment of agricultural good available at the beginning of the third stage of the game between the two regions. Furthermore, since by adding up equations (7a) and (7b) we get equation (4), the GEF problem simplifies to choosing {y j ; j = r,p} to maximize U r subject to (4) and U r = U p. The solution to this problem is given by: (8). (9)
11 In writing (8) and (9), we have already utilized the fact that the solution equations can be used to define the implicit functions y j1 (x r, x p ), j = r,p. 6 Differentiating the equations above yields: 10 (10a) (10b) (10c) (10d) Equations (10a) and (10c) tell us that the sum of the marginal responses to an increase in industrial production should equal the negative of the marginal transformation rate. Equations (10b) and (10d) show us how the utilities have to be adjusted when industrial production is increased in order to satisfy the horizontal equity property. In the second stage, region j chooses {x j } to maximize U j subject to y j = y j1 (x r, x p ), j = r,p. The first order conditions are as follows: (11) 6 For the remainder of the paper, superscript k, k = 1,2,3, will be used to distinguish functions and equilibrium quantities of the three different games.
12 11 As the marginal utilities of agricultural consumption are positive, equations (10b), (10d) and (11) imply that: (12) (13) Rewrite equations (11) as follows: (14) Now, note that equations (13) and (14) together imply equations (5). Since, as we have already seen, the transfer scheme also satisfies equation (4), we obtain the following result: Proposition 1: The transfer scheme based on the horizontal equity principle is Pareto efficient. This is a powerful result. Because each region finds it desirable to produce and consume the industrial good at an amount that satisfies the efficient conditions (5), we may conclude that each region unilaterally realizes that non-internalization of the global externality will only harm itself regional utilities are equated in the third stage of the game in spite of the actions taken in the second stage. In a sense, the incentives introduced by the transfer scheme are powerful enough to nullify each region s potential gain in ignoring the externality that its carbon dioxide emission generates. Such a perfect equivalence reasoning was first derived by Boadway (1982) and later extended by Myers (1990), but for settings with no interregional externalities. Our Proposition 1
13 12 extends this perfect equivalence reasoning to a situation involving interregional externalities. Similar results are available in the fiscal federalism literature (see, e.g. Wellisch (1994), Silva (1997), Silva and Caplan (1997), Nagase and Silva (2000) and Hoel and Shapiro (2000)). These works, however, neglect the issue of whether or not it is individually rational for a region to participate in a interregional scheme (or federation) designed to internalize externalities and implement transfers. We now turn our attention to the first stage of the game. Is the transfer scheme based on the horizontal equity principle implementable? To be implementable, the transfer scheme must be individually rational, that is, each region must find it desirable to participate. Let U j1 denote the utility level of region j in the subgame perfect equilibrium for the last two stages of the game. Formally, the transfer scheme under horizontal equity is implementable if and only if: (15) Figure 2 demonstrates the potentially large area of non-implementability corresponding to the horizontal equity solution. Point C on the Pareto frontier is the horizontal equity solution. A move to point C from any Nash solution located within box OABC is Pareto improving, while a move to point C from anywhere inside the area ADB is not (region r's welfare will decrease). 7 [INSERT FIGURE 2 HERE] 7 U r 0 > U p 0 implies that a noncooperative Nash solution will never lie below the 45 o line, thus ruling out area BCE as a non-implementation area.
14 Proportional Equity This game follows the same pattern as that presented for the horizontal equity scheme, except that the equity constraint faced by the GEF in the third stage is now U r / U r0 = U p / U p0. The solution to the GEF's problem is given by (4) and (16) Inserting the implicit functions y j2 (x r, x p ) into (4) and differentiating the implied equation together with (16) yields: (17a) (17b) (17c) (17d) In the second stage of the game, region j chooses {x j } to maximize U j subject to y j = y j2 (x r, x p ). The first order conditions are: (18)
15 14 It is now easy to see that equations (17a) - (17d) and (18) together imply equations (5). Since the proportional equity transfer scheme also satisfies equation (4), the subgame perfect equilibrium for the last two stages of the game is Pareto efficient. Similar to the horizontal equity principle, the incentives introduced by the proportional equity transfer scheme are powerful enough to nullify each region s potential gain in ignoring the externality that its emissions generate. In sum, the proportional equity scheme also leads to perfect incentive equivalence. Our result clearly demonstrates that it is possible to obtain perfect incentive equivalence without the equal utility condition. That is, the equal utility condition is sufficient but not necessary for perfect incentive equivalence. Our analysis enlarges the set of circumstances under which the perfect incentive equivalence reasoning derived by Boadway (1982) and extended by Myers (1990), Wellisch (1994), Silva (1997), Silva and Caplan (1997), Silva and Nagase (2000) and Hoel and Shapiro (2000) among others, is applicable. Indeed, it is straightforward to show that if we replace equation (16) by U r = f(u p ), where f is continuous and differentiable, the subgame perfect equilibrium for a two-stage game similar to the one investigated above is Pareto efficient. 8 In this new game, the regions independently choose how much of the industrial good they wish to consume in the first stage and the GEF chooses the allocation of the numeraire good across both regions in order to satisfy the overall resource constraint and the utility constraint, U r = f(u p ). When the regions anticipate that the utility constraint will always be satisfied, whether they behave efficiently or not, they realize that making choices that internalize the interregional 8 This claim assumes that the maximization problems are characterized by interior solutions and that the corresponding first order conditions in each problem are necessary and sufficient for a locally unique maximum. For the sake of brevity, we chose not to include the proof of this claim here. It is, nonetheless, available from the authors upon request.
16 15 externalities is in each region s best interest. The Pareto efficient allocation implied by the subgame perfect equilibrium for this game lies on the intersection of the function f and the Pareto frontier. The striking and distinguishing feature of the transfer scheme based on proportional equity relative to the transfer scheme based on horizontal equity, however, is that it necessarily leads to a Pareto improvement relative to the simultaneous Nash equilibrium allocation. In other words, it is always individually rational for each region to participate in the current transfer scheme. To see this, let U j2 denote the level of utility obtained by region j in the subgame perfect 0 equilibrium for the last two stages of the game. From U r / U r0 = U p / U p, we obtain U r = (U r0 / U p ) U p. The inefficient allocation (U p0, U r0 ) is located, on the line of slope U r / U p > 1, inside of the Pareto frontier. See line OA in Figure 3. The point (U p2, U r2 ), on the other hand, lies on the intersection of line OA and the Pareto frontier, since the subgame perfect equilibrium for the 2 last two stages of the current game is Pareto efficient and U r2 / U r0 = U p / U p0. In sum: Proposition 2:The transfer scheme based on the proportional equity principle is both Pareto efficient and fully implementable. This result is good news for environmental policy makers who are concerned with abating carbon dioxide emissions. It should be easier to convince the citizens of rich nations of the merits of proportional equity, as proposed here, than of the merits of horizontal equity. 3.3 Green Equity The equity constraint faced by the GEF in the third stage of this game is: (19) from which it follows that:
17 16 (20) Equation (19) tells us that the exact amount of the income transfer obey the rule that green GNP s must be equated. Equation (20) then shows us that this transfer amount equals half of the green GNP differential between the rich and poor regions. Substituting equation (20) into equations (7a) and (7b) and rearranging yields: (21) Differentiating equations (21) leads to: (22a) (22b) In the second stage of the game, region j chooses x j to maximize U j subject to y j = y j3 (x r, x p ). These maximization problems yield (23) Combining (23) with (21a), we obtain: (24) Equations (24) reveal that the marginal rates of substitution will be equalized across regions. However, the marginal rates of substitution do not equal the social marginal rate of
18 17 transformation, as required by Pareto efficiency. Hence, the scheme is inefficient. Interestingly, the right-hand sides of (24) correspond to the average of the private marginal rates of transformation see equations (6). We infer from this that the scheme induces the regions to partially internalize the externalities they generate. Is this scheme implementable? It may or may not be. There is no guarantee that each region s payoff from participation in the scheme exceeds its reservation utility level. Hence, besides being inefficient, the scheme based on green equity may also be non-implementable. 4. Concluding Remarks Our results suggest that rich and poor regions may behave efficiently in the presence of international resource transfers that satisfy horizontal or proportional equity. Because transfer schemes motivated by horizontal or proportional equity link the welfare levels of rich and poor regions, they create strong incentives for the regions to internalize the global externality. The efficiency properties of these transfer schemes are noteworthy in light of the call for international transfers in the Kyoto Protocol. Further, the proportional equity transfer scheme has the added advantage of being fully implementable. This full implementability property of the proportional equity transfer scheme makes it a more attractive scheme for policy purposes than the horizontal equity transfer scheme. We also find that a transfer scheme from rich to poor regions motivated by equalization of green GNP s not only fails to induce both regions to simultaneously behave efficiently, but may also fail to induce both regions to participate. By the efficiency criterion, the green equity scheme is certainly dominated by both horizontal equity and proportional equity schemes. By the implementability criterion, our proposed proportional equity scheme is undoubtedly the victor.
19 18 References Boadway, R., (1982), On the Method of Taxation and the Provision of Local Public Goods: Comment. American Economic Review, 72: Burtraw, D., (1996), The SO 2 Emissions Trading Program: Cost Savings With Allowance Trades, Contemporary Economic Policy, 14: Caplan, A.J. and E.C.D. Silva, (1999), Federal Acid Rain Games, Journal of Urban Economics, 46(1), July 1999, Caplan, A.J., R.C. Cornes, and E.C.D. Silva, (2000), Pure Public Goods and Income Redistribution in a Federation with Decentralized Leadership and Imperfect Labor Mobility, Journal of Public Economics, 77, Coggins, J.S. and J.R. Swinton, (1996), The Price of Pollution: A Dual Approach to Valuing SO 2 Allowances, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30: Hahn, R.W., (1989), Economic Prescriptions For Environmental Problems: How the Patient Followed the Doctor s Orders, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(2): Hamilton, K. and E. Lutz, (1996), Green National Accounts: Policy Uses and Empirical Experience, Environmental Economic Series Paper No. 39, Pollution and Environmental Economics Division, World Bank. Hanley, N., J. Shogren, and B. White, (1997), Environmental Economics In Theory and Practice, New York: Oxford University Press. Hoel, M. and P. Shapiro, (2000), Transboundary Environmental Problems with a Mobile Population: Is There a Need for Central Policy? unpublished paper. Janssen, J., (1999), (Self-) Enforcement of Joint Implementation and Clean Development Mechanism Contracts, paper presented at the First World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists, June 1998, Venice, Italy. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, December 10, 1997 Maloney, M. T. and B. Yandle, (1984), Estimation of the Cost of Air Pollution Control Regulation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 11:
20 19 Murdoch, J. C. and T. Sandler, (1997), The Voluntary Provision of a Pure Public Good: The Case of Reduced CFC Emissions and the Montreal Protocol, Journal of Public Economics, 63: Murdoch, J. C., T. Sandler, and K. Sargent, (1997), A Tale of Two Collectives: Sulfur versus Nitrogen Oxides Emission Reduction in Europe, Economica, 64: Myers, G.M., (1990), Optimality, Free Mobility, and the Regional Authority in a Federation, Journal of Public Economics, 43: Nagase, Y. and E.C.D. Silva, (2000), Optimal Control of Acid Rain in a Federation with Decentralized Leadership and Information, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), (1996), Development Coperation Review Series No. 13: Japan, Development Assistance Committee., (1996), Development Co-operation Review Series No. 14: Norway, Development Assistance Committee., (1996), Development Co-operation Review Series No. 19: Sweden, Development Assistance Committee., (1995), Efforts and Policies of the Members of the Development Assistance Committee, Report by James H. Michel, Chair of the Development Assistance Committee. Phillips, M. M., (1999), Debt Relief, Long Ignored, Gets Spotlight, The Wall Street Journal, Monday, April 26, page A2. Poterba, J. M., (1993), Global Warming Policy: A Public Finance Perspective, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(4): Sandler, T., (1997), Global Challenges: An Approach to Environmental, Political, and Economic Problems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Silva, E.C.D. and A.J. Caplan, (1997), Transboundary Pollution Control in Federal Systems, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 34: Stavins, R.N., (1998), What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO 2 Allowance Trading, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3): Tietenberg, T., (1992), Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, Third Edition, New York: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
21 20 Wellisch, D., (1994), Interregional Spillovers in the Presence of Perfect and Imperfect Household Mobility, Journal of Public Economics, 55: World Bank, (1999), Expanding the Measure of Wealth: Indicators of Environmentally Sustainable Development, Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies and Monograph Series No. 17, Environmental Department, Washington D.C.
22 21 Figure 1 Figure 2
23 Figure 3 22
An Equitable, Efficient, and Implementable Scheme to Control Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Applied Economics Faculty Publications Applied Economics 007 An Equitable, Efficient, and Implementable Scheme to Control Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions Arthur
More informationThe Private Provision of International Impure Public Goods: the Case of Climate Policy
The Private Provision of International Impure Public Goods: the Case of Climate Policy Martin Altemeyer-Bartscher Dirk T.G. Rübbelke Anil Markandya September 2010 Preliminary Version Please do not cite
More informationPartial privatization as a source of trade gains
Partial privatization as a source of trade gains Kenji Fujiwara School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University April 12, 2008 Abstract A model of mixed oligopoly is constructed in which a Home public firm
More informationSOPAAN April-Sept. :2014. Green Tax in India
Green Tax in India Ms. Manisha Gaur Assistant Professor Post Graduate Govt. College Sector-46, Chandigarh Abstract Tax imposed on the public has two reasons, one is to generate revenue for the Govt. and
More informationEquity constraints and efficiency in the tradeable permit market.
Equity constraints and efficiency in the tradeable permit market. By Cathrine Hagem Department of Economics, University of Oslo and CICERO, Center for International Climate and Environmental Research.
More informationMeasuring the Wealth of Nations: Income, Welfare and Sustainability in Representative-Agent Economies
Measuring the Wealth of Nations: Income, Welfare and Sustainability in Representative-Agent Economies Geo rey Heal and Bengt Kristrom May 24, 2004 Abstract In a nite-horizon general equilibrium model national
More informationBankruptcy risk and the performance of tradable permit markets. Abstract
Bankruptcy risk and the performance of tradable permit markets John Stranlund University of Massachusetts-Amherst Wei Zhang University of Massachusetts-Amherst Abstract We study the impacts of bankruptcy
More informationEnvironmental Regulation Regime Shift A Game-Theoretic Analysis
Environmental Regulation Regime Shift A Game-Theoretic Analysis Yusen SUNG National Taiwan University Department of Economics Taipei, Taiwan (E-mail) ysung@ntu.edu.tw September 18, 2017 Abstract Throughout
More informationGame Theory. Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari. Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India October 2012
Game Theory Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India October 22 COOPERATIVE GAME THEORY Correlated Strategies and Correlated
More informationIntermediate public economics 5 Externalities Hiroaki Sakamoto
Intermediate public economics 5 Externalities Hiroaki Sakamoto June 12, 2015 Contents 1. Externalities 2.1 Definition 2.2 Real-world examples 2. Modeling externalities 2.1 Pure-exchange economy a) example
More informationTopics in Contract Theory Lecture 1
Leonardo Felli 7 January, 2002 Topics in Contract Theory Lecture 1 Contract Theory has become only recently a subfield of Economics. As the name suggest the main object of the analysis is a contract. Therefore
More informationOil Monopoly and the Climate
Oil Monopoly the Climate By John Hassler, Per rusell, Conny Olovsson I Introduction This paper takes as given that (i) the burning of fossil fuel increases the carbon dioxide content in the atmosphere,
More informationAnswers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)
Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, 2016 1. In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average) cost. To investigate the consequences of markup pricing,
More informationInternational Trade in Emission Permits
International Trade in Emission Permits Jota Ishikawa Hitotsubashi University Kazuharu Kiyono Waseda University Morihiro Yomogida Sophia University August 31, 2006 Abstract This paper examines the effect
More informationEfficient provision of a public good
Public Goods Once a pure public good is provided, the additional resource cost of another person consuming the good is zero. The public good is nonrival in consumption. Examples: lighthouse national defense
More informationAppendix: Common Currencies vs. Monetary Independence
Appendix: Common Currencies vs. Monetary Independence A The infinite horizon model This section defines the equilibrium of the infinity horizon model described in Section III of the paper and characterizes
More informationEcon 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.
Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013. Do not turn the page until instructed to. Do not forget to write Problems 1 in the first Blue Book and Problems 2, 3 and 4 in the second Blue Book. 1 Econ 101A Final
More informationGRA 6639 Topics in Macroeconomics
Lecture 9 Spring 2012 An Intertemporal Approach to the Current Account Drago Bergholt (Drago.Bergholt@bi.no) Department of Economics INTRODUCTION Our goals for these two lectures (9 & 11): - Establish
More informationDoes Encourage Inward FDI Always Be a Dominant Strategy for Domestic Government? A Theoretical Analysis of Vertically Differentiated Industry
Lin, Journal of International and Global Economic Studies, 7(2), December 2014, 17-31 17 Does Encourage Inward FDI Always Be a Dominant Strategy for Domestic Government? A Theoretical Analysis of Vertically
More informationExercises Solutions: Oligopoly
Exercises Solutions: Oligopoly Exercise - Quantity competition 1 Take firm 1 s perspective Total revenue is R(q 1 = (4 q 1 q q 1 and, hence, marginal revenue is MR 1 (q 1 = 4 q 1 q Marginal cost is MC
More informationExpansion of Network Integrations: Two Scenarios, Trade Patterns, and Welfare
Journal of Economic Integration 20(4), December 2005; 631-643 Expansion of Network Integrations: Two Scenarios, Trade Patterns, and Welfare Noritsugu Nakanishi Kobe University Toru Kikuchi Kobe University
More informationOptimal inter-regional transfers with endogenous local public good prices and variable local rent capture
Optimal inter-regional transfers with endogenous local public good prices and variable local rent capture Jeffrey Petchey, James Petchey School of Economics and Finance, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
More informationOn Forchheimer s Model of Dominant Firm Price Leadership
On Forchheimer s Model of Dominant Firm Price Leadership Attila Tasnádi Department of Mathematics, Budapest University of Economic Sciences and Public Administration, H-1093 Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Hungary
More informationChapter 1 Microeconomics of Consumer Theory
Chapter Microeconomics of Consumer Theory The two broad categories of decision-makers in an economy are consumers and firms. Each individual in each of these groups makes its decisions in order to achieve
More informationUnraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets
Unraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets Nathaniel Hendren October, 2013 Abstract Both Akerlof (1970) and Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) show that
More informationA simple proof of the efficiency of the poll tax
A simple proof of the efficiency of the poll tax Michael Smart Department of Economics University of Toronto June 30, 1998 Abstract This note reviews the problems inherent in using the sum of compensating
More informationPublic spending on health care: how are different criteria related? a second opinion
Health Policy 53 (2000) 61 67 www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol Letter to the Editor Public spending on health care: how are different criteria related? a second opinion William Jack 1 The World Bank,
More informationUsing Trade Policy to Influence Firm Location. This Version: 9 May 2006 PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE DO NOT CITE
Using Trade Policy to Influence Firm Location This Version: 9 May 006 PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE DO NOT CITE Using Trade Policy to Influence Firm Location Nathaniel P.S. Cook Abstract This paper examines
More informationChapter 33: Public Goods
Chapter 33: Public Goods 33.1: Introduction Some people regard the message of this chapter that there are problems with the private provision of public goods as surprising or depressing. But the message
More informationInternational Environmental Agreements and Trading Blocks - Can Issue Linkage Enhance Cooperation?
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Papers 6-21-2018 International Environmental Agreements and Trading Blocks - Can Issue Linkage Enhance Cooperation? Effrosyni Diamantoudi Concordia University, effrosyni.diamantoudi@concordia.ca
More informationTransport Costs and North-South Trade
Transport Costs and North-South Trade Didier Laussel a and Raymond Riezman b a GREQAM, University of Aix-Marseille II b Department of Economics, University of Iowa Abstract We develop a simple two country
More informationChapter 3 Introduction to the General Equilibrium and to Welfare Economics
Chapter 3 Introduction to the General Equilibrium and to Welfare Economics Laurent Simula ENS Lyon 1 / 54 Roadmap Introduction Pareto Optimality General Equilibrium The Two Fundamental Theorems of Welfare
More informationSam Bucovetsky und Andreas Haufler: Preferential tax regimes with asymmetric countries
Sam Bucovetsky und Andreas Haufler: Preferential tax regimes with asymmetric countries Munich Discussion Paper No. 2006-30 Department of Economics University of Munich Volkswirtschaftliche Fakultät Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
More informationEcon 101A Final exam Mo 18 May, 2009.
Econ 101A Final exam Mo 18 May, 2009. Do not turn the page until instructed to. Do not forget to write Problems 1 and 2 in the first Blue Book and Problems 3 and 4 in the second Blue Book. 1 Econ 101A
More informationGrowth with Time Zone Differences
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Growth with Time Zone Differences Toru Kikuchi and Sugata Marjit February 010 Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/0748/ MPRA Paper No. 0748, posted 17. February
More informationSocial Common Capital and Sustainable Development. H. Uzawa. Social Common Capital Research, Tokyo, Japan. (IPD Climate Change Manchester Meeting)
Social Common Capital and Sustainable Development H. Uzawa Social Common Capital Research, Tokyo, Japan (IPD Climate Change Manchester Meeting) In this paper, we prove in terms of the prototype model of
More informationComparing Permit Allocation Options: The Main Points
1 Comparing Permit Allocation Options: The Main Points By Peter Bohm 1 April, 2002 Abstract In discussions about the policy design of domestic emission trading, e.g., when implementing the Kyoto Protocol,
More information9. Real business cycles in a two period economy
9. Real business cycles in a two period economy Index: 9. Real business cycles in a two period economy... 9. Introduction... 9. The Representative Agent Two Period Production Economy... 9.. The representative
More informationIMPERFECT COMPETITION AND TRADE POLICY
IMPERFECT COMPETITION AND TRADE POLICY Once there is imperfect competition in trade models, what happens if trade policies are introduced? A literature has grown up around this, often described as strategic
More informationLecture 14. Multinational Firms. 2. Dunning's OLI, joint inputs, firm versus plant-level scale economies
Lecture 14 Multinational Firms 1. Review of empirical evidence 2. Dunning's OLI, joint inputs, firm versus plant-level scale economies 3. A model with endogenous multinationals 4. Pattern of trade in goods
More informationStandard Risk Aversion and Efficient Risk Sharing
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Standard Risk Aversion and Efficient Risk Sharing Richard M. H. Suen University of Leicester 29 March 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/86499/ MPRA Paper
More informationDoes a carbon policy really burden low-income families?
Climate Change Policy Inititative April 20, 2017 Does a carbon policy really burden low-income families? Don Fullerton, Gutsgell Professor, Department of Finance, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
More information2. A DIAGRAMMATIC APPROACH TO THE OPTIMAL LEVEL OF PUBLIC INPUTS
2. A DIAGRAMMATIC APPROACH TO THE OPTIMAL LEVEL OF PUBLIC INPUTS JEL Classification: H21,H3,H41,H43 Keywords: Second best, excess burden, public input. Remarks 1. A version of this chapter has been accepted
More informationPublic Sector Economics Test Questions Randall Holcombe Fall 2017
Public Sector Economics Test Questions Randall Holcombe Fall 2017 1. Governments should act to further the public interest. This statement would probably receive general agreement, but it is not always
More informationA SECOND-BEST POLLUTION SOLUTION WITH SEPARATE TAXATION OF COMMODITIES AND EMISSIONS
A SECOND-BEST POLLUTION SOLUTION WITH SEPARATE TAXATION OF COMMODITIES AND EMISSIONS by Basharat A.K. Pitafi and James Roumasset Working Paper No. 02-8 August 2002 A Second-best Pollution Solution with
More informationGame Theory. Wolfgang Frimmel. Repeated Games
Game Theory Wolfgang Frimmel Repeated Games 1 / 41 Recap: SPNE The solution concept for dynamic games with complete information is the subgame perfect Nash Equilibrium (SPNE) Selten (1965): A strategy
More informationCash-Flow Taxes in an International Setting. Alan J. Auerbach University of California, Berkeley
Cash-Flow Taxes in an International Setting Alan J. Auerbach University of California, Berkeley Michael P. Devereux Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation This version: September 3, 2014 Abstract
More informationTrading Company and Indirect Exports
Trading Company and Indirect Exports Kiyoshi Matsubara June 015 Abstract This article develops an oligopoly model of trade intermediation. In the model, manufacturing firm(s) wanting to export their products
More informationMaximizing the expected net future value as an alternative strategy to gamma discounting
Maximizing the expected net future value as an alternative strategy to gamma discounting Christian Gollier University of Toulouse September 1, 2003 Abstract We examine the problem of selecting the discount
More informationPUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT IN THE PRESENCE OF PERFECT LABOR MOBILITY
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT IN THE PRESENCE OF PERFECT LABOR MOBILITY Gaku INOUE 1 1 Senior Researcher, Airport Department, National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management (3-1-1 Nagase,
More informationOptimal Trade Policies for Exporting Countries under the Stackelberg Type of Competition between Firms
17 RESEARCH ARTICE Optimal Trade Policies for Exporting Countries under the Stackelberg Type of Competition between irms Yordying Supasri and Makoto Tawada* Abstract This paper examines optimal trade policies
More informationOptimal Actuarial Fairness in Pension Systems
Optimal Actuarial Fairness in Pension Systems a Note by John Hassler * and Assar Lindbeck * Institute for International Economic Studies This revision: April 2, 1996 Preliminary Abstract A rationale for
More informationTrade Agreements and the Nature of Price Determination
Trade Agreements and the Nature of Price Determination By POL ANTRÀS AND ROBERT W. STAIGER The terms-of-trade theory of trade agreements holds that governments are attracted to trade agreements as a means
More informationDynamic Inconsistency and Non-preferential Taxation of Foreign Capital
Dynamic Inconsistency and Non-preferential Taxation of Foreign Capital Kaushal Kishore Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, USA. Santanu Roy Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, USA June
More informationForeign direct investment and export under imperfectly competitive host-country input market
Foreign direct investment and export under imperfectly competitive host-country input market Arijit Mukherjee University of Nottingham and The Leverhulme Centre for Research in Globalisation and Economic
More informationOn the 'Lock-In' Effects of Capital Gains Taxation
May 1, 1997 On the 'Lock-In' Effects of Capital Gains Taxation Yoshitsugu Kanemoto 1 Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113 Japan Abstract The most important drawback
More informationCan Equity Enhance Efficiency? Lessons from the Kyoto Protocol
Can Equity Enhance Efficiency? Lessons from the Kyoto Protocol by Francesco Bosello*, Barbara Buchner*, Carlo Carraro** and Davide Raggi* * Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei ** University of Venice and Fondazione
More informationFactors that Affect Fiscal Externalities in an Economic Union
Factors that Affect Fiscal Externalities in an Economic Union Timothy J. Goodspeed Hunter College - CUNY Department of Economics 695 Park Avenue New York, NY 10021 USA Telephone: 212-772-5434 Telefax:
More informationPAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV
GAME THEORY SOLUTION SET 1 WINTER 018 PAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV Introduction For suggested solution to problem 4, last year s suggested solutions by Tsz-Ning Wong were used who I think used suggested
More informationMicroeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: August 7, 2017
Microeconomic Theory II Preliminary Examination Solutions Exam date: August 7, 017 1. Sheila moves first and chooses either H or L. Bruce receives a signal, h or l, about Sheila s behavior. The distribution
More informationFINANCE THEORY: Intertemporal. and Optimal Firm Investment Decisions. Eric Zivot Econ 422 Summer R.W.Parks/E. Zivot ECON 422:Fisher 1.
FINANCE THEORY: Intertemporal Consumption-Saving and Optimal Firm Investment Decisions Eric Zivot Econ 422 Summer 21 ECON 422:Fisher 1 Reading PCBR, Chapter 1 (general overview of financial decision making)
More informationConsumption, Investment and the Fisher Separation Principle
Consumption, Investment and the Fisher Separation Principle Consumption with a Perfect Capital Market Consider a simple two-period world in which a single consumer must decide between consumption c 0 today
More informationIntroduction. Introduction. Pollution: A Negative Externality. Introduction. In this chapter, look for the answers to these questions: Externalities
Externalities P R I N C I P L E S O F MICROECONOMICS FOURTH EDITION N. GREGORY MANKIW Premium PowerPoint Slides by Ron Cronovich 7 update 8 Thomson South-Western, all rights reserved In this chapter, look
More informationUniversity of California, Davis Date: June 24, PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION FOR THE Ph.D. DEGREE. Answer four questions (out of five)
University of California, Davis Date: June 4, 03 Department of Economics Time: 5 hours Microeconomics Reading Time: 0 minutes ANSWER KEY PREIMINARY EXAMINATION FOR TE Ph.D. DEGREE Answer four questions
More informationRicardo. The Model. Ricardo s model has several assumptions:
Ricardo Ricardo as you will have read was a very smart man. He developed the first model of trade that affected the discussion of international trade from 1820 to the present day. Crucial predictions of
More informationFinancial Economics Field Exam August 2011
Financial Economics Field Exam August 2011 There are two questions on the exam, representing Macroeconomic Finance (234A) and Corporate Finance (234C). Please answer both questions to the best of your
More informationRevenue Equivalence and Income Taxation
Journal of Economics and Finance Volume 24 Number 1 Spring 2000 Pages 56-63 Revenue Equivalence and Income Taxation Veronika Grimm and Ulrich Schmidt* Abstract This paper considers the classical independent
More informationProject Evaluation and the Folk Principle when the Private Sector Lacks Perfect Foresight
Project Evaluation and the Folk Principle when the Private Sector Lacks Perfect Foresight David F. Burgess Professor Emeritus Department of Economics University of Western Ontario June 21, 2013 ABSTRACT
More informationEconomics 230a, Fall 2014 Lecture Note 7: Externalities, the Marginal Cost of Public Funds, and Imperfect Competition
Economics 230a, Fall 2014 Lecture Note 7: Externalities, the Marginal Cost of Public Funds, and Imperfect Competition We have seen that some approaches to dealing with externalities (for example, taxes
More informationAn Economic Analysis of Compulsory and Voluntary Insurance
Volume, Issue (0) ISSN: 5-839 An Economic Analysis of Compulsory and Voluntary Insurance Kazuhiko SAKAI Mahito OKURA (Corresponding author) Faculty of Economics Kurume University E-mail: sakai_kazuhiko@kurume-uacjp
More informationStable and sustainable global tax coordination with Leviathan governments
Fakultät III Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Wirtschaftsinformatik und Wirtschaftsrecht Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge Discussion Papers in Economics No. 166-14 July 2014 Thomas Eichner Rüdiger Pethig
More informationDiscounting the Benefits of Climate Change Policies Using Uncertain Rates
Discounting the Benefits of Climate Change Policies Using Uncertain Rates Richard Newell and William Pizer Evaluating environmental policies, such as the mitigation of greenhouse gases, frequently requires
More informationProblem Set VI: Edgeworth Box
Problem Set VI: Edgeworth Box Paolo Crosetto paolo.crosetto@unimi.it DEAS - University of Milan Exercises solved in class on March 15th, 2010 Recap: pure exchange The simplest model of a general equilibrium
More informationWhat are the additional assumptions that must be satisfied for Rabin s theorem to hold?
Exam ECON 4260, Spring 2013 Suggested answers to Problems 1, 2 and 4 Problem 1 (counts 10%) Rabin s theorem shows that if a person is risk averse in a small gamble, then it follows as a logical consequence
More informationDo Government Subsidies Increase the Private Supply of Public Goods?
Do Government Subsidies Increase the Private Supply of Public Goods? by James Andreoni and Ted Bergstrom University of Wisconsin and University of Michigan Current version: preprint, 1995 Abstract. We
More information1 The Rotten Kid Theorem
ACE 501 Fall, 2007 Comments on Gibbons problem 2.1 The Rotten Kid Theorem Carl H. Nelson 9/7/07 1 The Rotten Kid Theorem The Rotten Kid Theorem that you proved in problem set 2 is an important insight
More informationInternational Trade in Resource Goods and Returns to Labor in the Non-Resource Sectors
IIFET 2000 roceedings International Trade in Resource Goods and Returns to Labor in the Non-Resource Sectors Ali Emami Departments of Finance and Economics University of Oregon USA Richard S. ohnston Department
More informationTheoretical Tools of Public Finance. 131 Undergraduate Public Economics Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley
Theoretical Tools of Public Finance 131 Undergraduate Public Economics Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley 1 THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL TOOLS Theoretical tools: The set of tools designed to understand the mechanics
More informationEnvironmental Tax Burden in a Vertical Relationship with Pollution-Abatement R&D
Journal of Management and Sustainability; Vol. 4, No. 1; 2014 ISSN 1925-4725 E-ISSN 1925-4733 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Environmental Tax Burden in a Vertical Relationship with
More informationFinal Examination December 14, Economics 5010 AF3.0 : Applied Microeconomics. time=2.5 hours
YORK UNIVERSITY Faculty of Graduate Studies Final Examination December 14, 2010 Economics 5010 AF3.0 : Applied Microeconomics S. Bucovetsky time=2.5 hours Do any 6 of the following 10 questions. All count
More informationChapter URL:
This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Taxing Multinational Corporations Volume Author/Editor: Martin Feldstein, James R. Hines
More informationresearch paper series
research paper series Research Paper 00/9 Foreign direct investment and export under imperfectly competitive host-country input market by A. Mukherjee The Centre acknowledges financial support from The
More informationEcon 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.
Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013. Do not turn the page until instructed to. Do not forget to write Problems 1 in the first Blue Book and Problems 2, 3 and 4 in the second Blue Book. 1 Econ 101A Final
More informationSuggested solutions to the 6 th seminar, ECON4260
1 Suggested solutions to the 6 th seminar, ECON4260 Problem 1 a) What is a public good game? See, for example, Camerer (2003), Fehr and Schmidt (1999) p.836, and/or lecture notes, lecture 1 of Topic 3.
More informationTHE BOADWAY PARADOX REVISITED
THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY WORKING PAPERS IN ECONOMICS AND ECONOMETRICS THE BOADWAY PARADOX REVISITED Chris Jones School of Economics The Faculty of Economics and Commerce The Australian National
More informationMarch 30, Why do economists (and increasingly, engineers and computer scientists) study auctions?
March 3, 215 Steven A. Matthews, A Technical Primer on Auction Theory I: Independent Private Values, Northwestern University CMSEMS Discussion Paper No. 196, May, 1995. This paper is posted on the course
More informationIn reality; some cases of prisoner s dilemma end in cooperation. Game Theory Dr. F. Fatemi Page 219
Repeated Games Basic lesson of prisoner s dilemma: In one-shot interaction, individual s have incentive to behave opportunistically Leads to socially inefficient outcomes In reality; some cases of prisoner
More informationChapter 4 Monetary and Fiscal. Framework
Chapter 4 Monetary and Fiscal Policies in IS-LM Framework Monetary and Fiscal Policies in IS-LM Framework 64 CHAPTER-4 MONETARY AND FISCAL POLICIES IN IS-LM FRAMEWORK 4.1 INTRODUCTION Since World War II,
More informationJanuary 26,
January 26, 2015 Exercise 9 7.c.1, 7.d.1, 7.d.2, 8.b.1, 8.b.2, 8.b.3, 8.b.4,8.b.5, 8.d.1, 8.d.2 Example 10 There are two divisions of a firm (1 and 2) that would benefit from a research project conducted
More informationBureaucratic Efficiency and Democratic Choice
Bureaucratic Efficiency and Democratic Choice Randy Cragun December 12, 2012 Results from comparisons of inequality databases (including the UN-WIDER data) and red tape and corruption indices (such as
More informationOptimal education policies and comparative advantage
Optimal education policies and comparative advantage Spiros Bougheas University of Nottingham Raymond Riezman University of Iowa August 2006 Richard Kneller University of Nottingham Abstract We consider
More informationPaths of Efficient Self Enforcing Trade Agreements. By Eric W. Bond. Vanderbilt University. May 29, 2007
Paths of Efficient Self Enforcing Trade Agreements By Eric W. Bond Vanderbilt University May 29, 2007 I. Introduction An extensive literature has developed on whether preferential trade agreements are
More informationGAME THEORY. Game theory. The odds and evens game. Two person, zero sum game. Prototype example
Game theory GAME THEORY (Hillier & Lieberman Introduction to Operations Research, 8 th edition) Mathematical theory that deals, in an formal, abstract way, with the general features of competitive situations
More informationChapter 2 Equilibrium and Efficiency
Chapter Equilibrium and Efficiency Reading Essential reading Hindriks, J and G.D. Myles Intermediate Public Economics. (Cambridge: MIT Press, 005) Chapter. Further reading Duffie, D. and H. Sonnenschein
More informationFinancial Fragility A Global-Games Approach Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Financial Fragility A Global-Games Approach Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Financial Fragility and Coordination Failures What makes financial systems fragile? What causes crises
More informationStrategic information acquisition and the mitigation of global warming
Strategic information acquisition and the mitigation of global warming Florian Morath WZB and Free University of Berlin May 15, 2008 Abstract We consider the strategic role of uncertainty and information
More informationMicroeconomic Theory May 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program.
Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program May 2013 *********************************************** COVER SHEET ***********************************************
More informationWhen one firm considers changing its price or output level, it must make assumptions about the reactions of its rivals.
Chapter 3 Oligopoly Oligopoly is an industry where there are relatively few sellers. The product may be standardized (steel) or differentiated (automobiles). The firms have a high degree of interdependence.
More informationTitle: The Relative-Profit-Maximization Objective of Private Firms and Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Oligopoly
Working Paper Series No. 09007(Econ) China Economics and Management Academy China Institute for Advanced Study Central University of Finance and Economics Title: The Relative-Profit-Maximization Objective
More informationStrategic environmental policy under free trade with transboundary pollution
Economics Working Papers (2002 2016) Economics 10-1-2007 Strategic environmental policy under free trade with transboundary pollution Shiva Sikdar Iowa State University, shiva@iastate.edu Harvey E. Lapan
More information