Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after October 24, 1992, UNITS
|
|
- Morgan Woods
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after October 4, 99, B-4K4) DATE STAGE TYPE PRODUTION PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUHBER UNITS HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON- SHARE EVEN HEAD ASH PROD. -HARNING- NO VALID REEIPTS REORDS DATE STAGE TYPE INPUT NAHE NUMBER ASH FIXED LANDLORD NON OR SHARE PRODUTION INPUT UNITS ASH VARI. 0/6/9 PREHARVEST H PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON /6/9 PREHARVEST G BRUSH LEARING.0000 V.00 0/6/9 PREHARVEST H PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON //9 PREHARVEST H DISKING - TANDEH 6 ROH /5/9 PREHARVEST H PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON /0/9 PREHARVEST H DISKING - TANDEH 6 ROH //9 PREHARVEST E SEED BUFFELGR V.00 04//9 PREHARVEST H SEEDING BROADST //9 PREHARVEST H ULTIPAK /5/9 PREHARVEST H PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON /5/9 PREHARVEST H PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON /3/9 PREHARVEST K PASTURE.0000 F.00 Information prosanted Is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intended to racognlza or pradict the costs and raturns from any ono particular farm or ranch operation. These projections wara collected and developed by Staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extansion Service and approved for publication. 4.4
2 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after October 4, 99. B-4K4) BUFFLEGRASS PASTURE, DRYLAND - RIO GRANDE PLAIN Texas oastal Bend District (4) 99 Projected osts and Returns per G R O S S I N O M E D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t T o t a l G R A Z I N G A U M T o t a l G R O S S I n c o m e V A R I A B L E O S T D e s c r i p t i o n Q u a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t T o t a l PREHARVEST NITROGEN F u e l & L u b e - lb. M a c h i n e r y.90 A c r e R e p a i r s L a b o r - - M a c h i n e r y M a c h i n e r y H o u r A c r e Total PREHARVEST 8.87 I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d D o l T o t a l V A R I A B L E O S T Break- Even Price, Total Variable ost $ per AUM of GRAZING G R O S S I N O M E m i n u s V A R I A B L E O S T FIXED OST Description Unit Total s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t A c r e. 3 Land 8.00 Perennial rop.96 Total FIXED ost 3. 9 Break-Even Price, Total ost $ 6.4 per AUM of GRAZING Total of ALL ost 403 N E T P R O J E T E D R E T U R N S Your Estimate Information presented is preparad solely as a general guido and is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any ono particular farm or ranch operation. Thaso projections wero collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approved for publication. 4.43
3 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y B - 4 ( 4 ) Not to be Used without Updating after October 4, 99. DATE STAGE PRODUTION TYPE PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUMBER UNITS HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON- SHARE EVEN HEAD ASH PROD.,-^k /5/9 GRAZING GRAZING D A T E S T A G E TYPE INPUT NAHE NUHBER ASH FIXED LANDLORD NON OR SHARE PRODUTION INPUT UNITS ASH VARI. 0/6/9 PREHARVEST H PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON /6/9 PREHARVEST E NITROGEN FERT V.00 04/5/9 PREHARVEST H PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON /5/9 PREHARVEST H PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON /5/9 PREHARVEST H PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON /5/9 K PASTURE.0000 F.00 /5/9 L BUFFLE GRASS.0000 F.00 /5/9 PREHARVEST H PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not Intended to recognize or predict the oosts and raturns from any ana particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were col locked and davalopad by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approvad for publication. 4.44
4 ^gpn GROSS INOME Description Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after October 4, 99, OASTAL BERMUDA ESTABLISHMENT - RIO GRANDE PLAIN Texas oastal Bend District 99 Projected osts and Returns per Quantity Unit $ / Unit Total - _ ssss ss::s:= ss:: sss sssssssssss B-4K4) Your Estimate -WARNING- No gross receipts VARIABLE OST Description ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss: PREHARVEST USTOM SPRIGGING NITROGEN PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER APPL. Fuel & Lube - Machinery R e p a i r s - M a c h i n e r y L a b o r - M a c h i n e r y Total PREHARVEST I n t e r e s t - O B o r r o w e d Total VARIABLE OST Quantity Unit $ / Unii t Total ssss ssss:= ss:: = = s sssssssssss.000 acre lb., lb acre., Hour 5., Dol SSSSBBSSSSS GROSS INOME minus VARIABLE OST FIXED OST Description Machinery and Equipment Land Total FIXED ost Total of ALL ost NET PROJETED RETURNS Unit Total Information prasontad is prepared solely as a general guida and is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any ono particular farm or ranch operation. These projections wore collected and developed by Staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extansion Service and approvad for publication. 4.45
5 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 4, 9 9 B-4(4) DATE STAGE PRODUTION TYPE PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUHBER UNITS HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON- SHARE EVEN HEAD ASH PROD. -HARNING- NO VALID REEIPTS REORDS DATE STAGE PRODUTION 04/6/9 PREHARVEST 06/6/9 PREHARVEST 06/6/9 PREHARVEST 07/6/9 PREHARVEST 08/06/9 PREHARVEST 08//9 PREHARVEST 08/6/9 PREHARVEST 08/6/9 PREHARVEST 08//9 PREHARVEST 08//9 PREHARVEST 08//9 PREHARVEST /5/9 TYPE INPUT INPUT NAHE H SHRED STALKS H SHRED STALKS H PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON H SHRED STALKS H SHRED STALKS H PLOHING 6 FT G USTOH SPRIGGING H DISKING - TANDEH 6 ROH E N I T R O G E N F E R T E PHOSPHORUS FERT G FERTILIZER APPL. K PASTURE NUHBER ASH FIXED LANDLORD O F N O N - O R S H A R E UNITS ASH VARI. t O S O l I U S S Z B B h h b b b o s s s e V V V V F.00 Information prasontad s prepared solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any ona particular farm or ranch operation. Those projections were collected and developed by staff mambars of tha Texas Agricultural Extansion Service and approved for publication. 4.46
6 GROSS INOME Description GRAZING Total GROSS Income VARIABLE OST Description PREHARVEST NITROGEN PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER APPL. Fuel & Lube - Machinery R e p a i r s - M a c h i n e r y L a b o r - M a c h i n e r y Total PREHARVEST Interest Interest Total VARIABLE OST Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after October 4, OASTAL BERMUDA PASTURE, DRYLAND-RIO GRANDE PLAIN Texas oastal Bend District ( 4) 99 Projected osts and Returns per O Borrowed Positive ash Q u a n t i t y U n i t 6.OOO AUM $ / Unit.0000 Break-Even Price, Total Variable ost $ 5. per AUM of GRAZ ING GROSS INOME minus VARIABLE OST FIXED OST Description Machinery and Equipment Land Perennial rop Total FIXED ost Break-Even Price, Total ost $ Total of ALL ost NET PROJETED RETURNS Quantity Unit $ / Unit 99. Total lb lb acre H o u r Dol Dol Unit 0.07 per AUtM Of GRAZING Total Total B-4(4) Your Estimate J^*s Information prasontad is praparad solely as a general guide and is not intandad to racognlza or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch oparation. These projections ware collected and developed by staff mambars of tha Texas Agricultural Extansion Service and approvad for publication. 4.47
7 P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 4, 9 9. B-4(4) DATE STAGE PRODUTION TYPE PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUMBER UNITS HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON- SHARE EVEN HEAD ASH PROD. 0/3/93 GRAZING GRAZING D A T E S T A G E TYPE INPUT NAHE NUMBER ASH FIXED LANDLORD NON OR SHARE PRODUTION INPUT UNITS ASH VARI. 04/5/9 PREHARVEST E NITROGEN FERT V.00 04/5/9 PREHARVEST E PHOSPHORUS FERT V.00 04/5/9 PREHARVEST G FERTILIZER APPL V.00 06/5/9 PREHARVEST H PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON /3/93 HARVEST K PASTURE.0000 F.00 0/3/93 L OASTAL BERMUDA.0000 F.00 Information presented is prepared solely as a goneral guide and is not Intended to recognize or predict tha costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extansion Service and approvad for publication. 4.48
8 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after October 4, 99, B-4(4) 0^*. KLEINGRASS ESTABLISHMENT, DRYLAND Texas oastaal Bend District (4)-Ro Grande Plain 99 Projected osts and Returns per GROSS INOME Description ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss GRAZING Quantity.000 Unit ssss AUM $ / Unit.0000 Total.00 Your Estimate Total GROSS Income.00 VARIABLE OST Description Quantity Unit $ ss: / Unit Total SEED NITROGEN PHOSPHORUS.4D AMINE Fuel & Lube Repairs Labor Interest - Machinery - Machinery - Machinery - O Borrowed lb. lb. lb. lb. Hour Dol Total VARIABLE OST 60.9 Break-Even Price, Total Variable ost GROSS INOME minus VARIABLE OST FIXED OST Description sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss M a c h i n e r y a n d E q u i p m e n t Land Total FIXED ost $ p e r A U M o f G R A Z I N G Unit Total Break-Even Price, Total ost $ 88.8 per AUM'of GRAZING Total of ALL ost NET PROJETED RETURNS J^=N Information prasontad is prepared sololy as a goneral guide and is net Intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any ana particular farm or ranch oparatlon. These projections wora collected and developed by staff mambars of the Texas Agricultural Extansion Service and approvad for publication. 4.49
9 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after October 4, 99, B-4K4) DATE STAGE TYPE PRODUT NAHE NUHBER HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON SHARE EVEN PRODUTION PROD. UNITS HEAD ASH PROD. /0/9 A GRAZING DATE STAGE TYPE INPUT NAHE NUHBER ASH FIXED LANDLORD NON OR SHARE PRODUTION INPUT UNITS ASH VARI. 0//9 M HISEL /6/9 H ULTIVATE ROLLING //9 H ULTIVATE ROLLING //9 H ULTIVATE 6 ROH /05/9 E SEED KLEIN V.00 03//9 E NITROGEN FERT V.00 03//9 E PHOSPHORUS FERT V.00 03//9 E,4D AHINE.0000 V.00 06/30/9 H PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON /3/9 K ASH-RENT KLEINGR F.00 Information presented is prepared solely as a genaral guide and is not Intended to recognize or predict tha costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. Thaso projections were collected and developed by staff mambars of tha Taxas Agricultural Extension Service and approvad for publication. 4.50
10 GROSS INOME Description GRAZING Total GROSS Income VARIABLE OST Description Fuel & Lube Repairs Labor Interest Total VARIABLE OST Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after October 4, 99, KLEINGRASS PASTURE, DRYLAND Texas oastal Bend District (4)-Ro Grande Plain 99 Projected osts and Returns per Machinery Machinery Machinery Positive ash Q u a n t i t y U n i t AUM $ / Unit.0000 Break-Even Price, Total Variable ost Oii t $ $ 0. 3 p e r A U M o f G R A Z ING GROSS INOME minus VARIABLE OST FIXED OST Description SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSBSSSSSSSBSSBSSSS Machinery and Equipment Land Perennial rop Total FIXED ost Break-Even Price, Total ost $ Total of ALL ost NET PROJETED RETURNS Qij a n t i t y U n i t $ / U n i t H o u r Dol Unit per AUM of GRAZING Total Total == Total , , ,. 4, ,.33 4,.9 7, B-4K4) Your Estimate Information prasontad is praparad solely as a general guide and Is not intendod to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. Thaso projections were collected and developed by staff members of tha Taxas Agricultural Extension Service and approved for publication. 4.5
11 Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after October 4, 99, B-4K4) DATE STAGE TYPE PRODUT NAHE NUMBER HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD EIRE) PER NON SHARE :VEI PRODUTION PROD. UNITS HEAD ASH >ROI BaOBOOO 03/4/9 A GRAZING Y 04/4/9 A GRAZING Y 05/4/9 A GRAZING Y 06/4/9 A GRAZING Y 07/4/9 A GRAZING Y 08/4/9 A GRAZING Y 09/4/9 A GRAZING Y.^*\ DATE STAGE PRODUTION TYPE INPUT INPUT NAHE NUMBER UNITS ASH FIXED LANDLORD NON OR SHARE ASH VARI. 06/30/9 H PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON /5/9 H SHRED STALKS /3/9 K ASH-RENT KLEINGR F.00 /3/9 L KLEINGRASS RGP.0000 F.00 Information prasontad is praparad solely as a general guide and Is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any ono particular farm or ranch operation. Those projections were collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extansion Sarvica and approvad far publication. 4.5
12 ROP PRODUTS REPORT October 4, 99 rop Product Name Price Unit Weight ash per of per Flow Unit Mes. Unit Row ORN 600 bu OTTON LINT.5700 lb..oooo 0 OTTONSEED.0000 ton DEFIIENY PMT. ORN.40 bu. 56.OOOO 0 DEFIIENY PMT. OTTON.500 lb..oooo 0 DEFIIENY PMT. SORGHUM.0 cwt DEFIIENY PMT. WHEAT 500 bu FLAX bu GRAZING.0000 AUM.0000 GRAZING RGP.0000 AUM.0000 HAY.OOOO bale HAY ALFALFA ton HAY OASTAL ton HAY SORGHUM ton KLEINGRASS SEED lb PEANUTS cwt RIE ST ROP LOAN 6300 cwt RIE ND ROP LOAN 6300 cwt RIE ENHANEMENT.5000 cwt RIE SUBSIDY cwt SORGHUM * cwt SOYBEANS bu WATERMELON cwt WHEAT WINTER bu Information prasontad Is praparad solely as a general guide and is net Intended to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any ono particular farm or ranch operation. Those projections were collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extansion Service and approved for publication. 4.53
13 TRATORS, IMPLEMENTS AND EQUIPMENT OTOBER 4, 99 DESRIPTION TRATOR TRATOR TRATOR TRATOR TRATOR TRATOR *^V HORSEPOHER RATING (HP) REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) SPEED (HI/H) FIELD EFFIIENY (%> APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT MULTIPLIER LABOR HULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYHENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR F FARH PARTS & LABOR REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR 8 REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR 8 APAITY (DEF.,AL.) FUEL USE (DEF.,AL.) R & H A L. ( 8, 8 ) LEASE AL. (HOUR.YEAR) TRATOR TRATOR TRATOR TRATOR TRATOR TRATOR 0 HP 5 HP 50 HP HP 5 HP 40 HP DI DI DI DI DI DI (X) (HR) DESRIPTION TRATOR SELF PROPELLED IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT KORSEPOHER RATING (HP) REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) SPEED (HI/H) FIELD EFFIIENY (X) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT HULTIPLIER LABOR MULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYHENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR (X) (HR) F FARH PARTS & LABOR REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR # REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR 8 APAITY (DEF..AL.) FUEL USE (DEF..AL.) R & H A L. ( 8, 8 ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) TRATOR 75 HP 75 DI OMBINE RIE 90 DI BEDDER 3.5 FT BEDDER 8 FT BEDDER 0 FT BEDDER 5 FT Information presented is prepared solely as a goneral guide and is not Intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch aparation. These projections were col looted and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extansion Service and approvad for publication. 4.54
14 Information prasontad is praparad solely as a genaral guide and is not Intonded to racognize or predict the costs and raturns from any ana particular farm or ranch operation. These projections were collected and developed by staff mambars of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approvad for publication DESRIPTION IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT f0^\ KORSEPOHER RATING (HP) REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) SPEED (HI/H) FIELD EFFIIENY (X) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT HULTIPLIER LABOR HULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYHENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR F FARH PARTS & LABOR (X) (HR) REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR 8 APAITY (DEF.,AL.) FUEL USE (DEF.,AL.) R & H A L. ( 8, 8 ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) IBPD OQIMID B P8D BLADE BROADAST SEEDER DOZER HISEL FT HISEL 0 FT D OHBINE PEANUT ULTIPAKER DESRIPTION KORSEPOHER RATING (HP) REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) SPEED (HI/H) FIELD EFFIIENY (%) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT HULTIPLIER LABOR MULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYHENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR (%) (HR) F FARH PARTS & LABOR REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # APAITY (DEF.,AL.) FUEL USE (DEF..AL.) R & H A L. ( #, # ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT ULTIVATOR ULTIVATOR ULTIVATOR ULTIVATOR ULTIVATOR ULTIVATOR-36 ROH 3.3 FT 0 FT 5 FT ROLLING FIELD
15 DESRIPTION IHPLEHENT IMPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IMPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT KORSEPOHER RATING (HP) REMAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) ANNUAL USE (HR OR MI) SPEED (HI/H) FIELD EFFIIENY (X) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT HULTIPLIER LABOR HULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYHENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR F FARH PARTS & LABOR (X) (HR) REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR # REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR 8 APAITY (DEF.,AL.) FUEL USE (DEF.,AL.) R & H A L. ( #, # ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) tacosjccsgotiigjattori bsbi DIGGER DISK DISK DISK DISK DISK J-"S PEANUT 4 ROH 6 ROH 8 ROH FSET TANDEH DESRIPTION HORSEPOHER RATING (HP) REHAINING LIFE (KR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) SPEED (HI/H) FIELD EFFIIENY (X) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT HULTIPLIER LABOR MULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYHENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR F FARH PARTS & LABOR (%) (HR) REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR # REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR # APAITY (DEF..AL.) FUEL USE (DEF..AL.) R & H A L. ( 8, 8 ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) IHPLEHENT DISK - TANDEH ROH IHPLEHENT DISK - TANDEH FT IHPLEHENT DISK - TANDEH 6 ROH IHPLEHENT DRILL FT IMPLEMENT svbbsbawmsaaa oca DRILL FT IMPLEHENT FERT. SPREADER 0 FT Information prasented Is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any ono particular farm or ranch operation. These projections wore collected and developed by staff members of tho Texas Agricultural Extansion Service and approved for publication. 4.56
16 DESRIPTION IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHEIHT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT KORSEPOHER RATING (HP) REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) SPEED (HI/H) FIELD EFFIIENY (%) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT HULTIPLIER LABOR MULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYHENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR (X) (HR) F FARH PARTS & LABOR REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR 8 APAITY (DEF..AL.) FUEL USE (DEF..AL.) R & H A L. ( #, # ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) FERT. SPREADER FIELD ULTIVATOR FIELD ULTIVATOR GRAIN ART HARROWS HERB. APPLIATOR 8 ROH 9 FT 6 ROH 0 FT D DESRIPTION KORSEPOHER RATING (HP) REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) SPEED (-MI/H) FIELD EFFIIENY (%) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT HULTIPLIER LABOR MULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE S A LVA G E VA L U E ( % ) URRENT HARKET VALUE L E A S E PAY H E N T ( $ ) ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR (HR) F FARH PARTS & LABOR REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR 8 APAITY (DEF..AL.) FUEL USE (DEF.,AL.) R & H A L. ( 8, 8 ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT LimtiUU UUQ UlliBLIHUU Q HERB. APPLIATOR LAND PLANE HOLDBOARD PLOH HOLDBOARD PLOH PIKER HHEELS PLANTER 5 FT 6 FT 3.5 FT Information prasontad is praparad solely as a general guida and is not Intandad to rocognlzo or predict the costs and raturns from any ono particular farm or ranch oparation. Those projections wero collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extansion Service and approvad for publication. 4.57
17 DESRIPTION KORSEPOHER RATING (HP) REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) SPEED (HI/H) FIELD EFFIIENY (%) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT MULTIPLIER LABOR HULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYHENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR F FARH PARTS & LABOR (%) (HR) REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR 8 APAITY FUEL USE R & H AL. LEASE AL. (DEF.,AL.) (DEF.,AL.) (#,#) (HOUR,YEAR) IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT. I H P L E H E N T IHPLEHENT PLANTER PLANTER PLANTER PLANTER PLOH ROLLER 8 FT 0 FT 8 ROH PEANUT LEVEE 0 FT /* *% DESRIPTION HORSEPOHER RATING (HP) REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) SPEED (HI/H) FIELD EFFIIENY (X) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT MULTIPLIER LABOR MULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE SALVAGE VALUE URRENT HARKET VALUE LEASE PAYHENT ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR (X) (HR) F FARH PARTS & LABOR REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR # REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR # APAITY (DEF.,AL.) FUEL USE (DEF.,AL.) R & H A L. ( #, # ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) IMPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT ROLLER ROPE HIK SHREDDER SPRAYER SPRAYER SPRAYER 4 ROH 3 FT 3.5 FT 0 FT 5 FT *-SB% ys% Information prasontad is praparad solely as a ganoral guide and Is not intanded to recognize or predict the casts and returns from any ono particular farm or ranch oparation. Thaso projections wore collected and developed by staff mombers of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approved for publication. 4.58
18 Information presented is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch oparation. These projections were collected and davelopad by staff mambors of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approvad for publication DESRIPTION IHPLEHENT IHPLEHENT EQUIPHENT EQUIPHENT EQUIPHENT EQUIPHENT iflfp^n HORSEPOHER RATING (HP) REHAINING LIFE (HR OR Hi) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) SPEED (HI/H) FIELD EFFIIENY (X) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT HULTIPLIER LABOR HULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE S A LVA G E VA L U E ( X ) URRENT HARKET VALUE L E A S E PAY H E N T ( $ ) ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR (HR) F FARH PARTS & LABOR REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR # APAITY (DEF..AL.) FUEL USE (DEF..AL.) R & H A L. ( 8, 8 ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) SPRAYER HERB SHEEP KULHER ATTLE EQUIPHENT LEVEE BOX T-A SALE SQUEEZE HUTE jp^n DESRIPTION HORSEPOHER RATING (HP) REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) SPEED (HI/H) FIELD EFFIIENY (X) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT MULTIPLIER LABOR MULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE S A LVA G E VA L U E ( X ) URRENT HARKET VALUE L E A S E PAY H E N T ( $ ) ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX ANNUAL INSURANE ON FARH HIRED LABOR (HR) F FARH PARTS & LABOR REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR 8 APAITY (DEF..AL.) FUEL USE (DEF..AL.) R & H A L. ( #, # ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) EQUIPHENT STOK SPRAYER EQUIPHENT BBSOttPWO JQg'illlMaq'e'P S3BaBBBgBBBIlBBB axb STOK TRAILER EQUIPHENT SUPPL. FEEDER EQUIPHENT TAK EQUIPHENT VET. EQUIPHENT Jr**^
19 OPERATING INPUT RESOURES October 4, 99 Operating Input Price Unit ash per of Flow Unit Measure Row.4D AMINE 6.50 lb. 45 0% PROTEIN.75 cwt. 47 ALLOTMENT LEASE 3.50 cwt 55 ATRAZINE HERB.79 lb. 45 BANVEL.46 oz. 45 BENLATE 3.38 lb. 45 BIDRIN INSET..47 oz. 45 BRAVO.95 pint 45 BROKERAGE.50 cwt. 55 APAROL 5.77 lb. 45 LASSIFYING FEE OTTON 5 bale 55 OUNT/LORS/FURA INS.50 lb. 45 OUNTER/LORSBAN INS.70 lb. 45 DESIANT 6 qt. 45 DIFOLATAN. 6.0 qt. 45 DROPP lb 45 ERADIANE 4. lb. 45 FERROUS SULFATE.4 lb. 45 FURADAN 5G INS.58 lb. 45 FURADAN 3G a c r e 45 GUTHION E INS.56 pint 45 GYPSUM.38 cwt. 43 HAY.00 bale 47 INOULANT SOYBEAN.00 bu. 43 INSETIIDE 6 pint 45 INSETIIDE ALFALFA 6.00 appl 45 INSETIIDE RIE.40 appl 45 LASSO HERB 5.7 lb. 45 LORSBAN 4. 4 pint 45 MALATHION. oz. 45 MARKETING 9.75 head 55 MPA.37 pint 45 METHYL PARATHION 3.5 qt. 45 METHYLATE 7. gal. 45 MILOGUARD HERB..96 lb. 45 MISELLANEOUS ALFALFA.00 acre 55 NITROGEN FERT. 9 lb. 44 ORTHENE 75S INS.44 oz. 45 PASTURE IMPROV. acre 55 PHOSPHORUS FERT.4 lb. 44 PIX 3.00 pint 45 POTASSIUM FERT. 8 lb. 44 PREFAR WATMELON 5.50 qt. 45 PROMOTIONAL FEES OTTON.50 c w t. 55 PROPANIL-ORDRAM 6.00 appl 45 PYDRIN INSET..75 oz. 45 PYRETHROID INS.03 oz. 45 RANGE UBES.07 lb. 47 ROUNDUP HERB.5 pint 45 SALES OMMISSION RIE.07 cwt. 55 SALT & MINERALS.30 lb. 47 SEED BUFFELGR 5 lb. 43 SEED ORN.75 thou 43 SEED OTTON.45 lb. 43 SEED FLAX.38 lb. 43 SEED HAYGRAZE.36 lb 43 SEED KLEIN..00 lb. 43 SEED OATS 4.84 bu. 43 SEED PEANUT 0 lb. 43 SEED RIE 4.00 cwt. 43 SEED SORGHUM 8 lb. 43 SEED SOYBEANS.3 lb. 43 SEED WATMELON 4 lb. 43 SEED WHEAT. lb. 43 SEED, ALFALFA DRYLAND.5 lb. 43 SEED-FORAGE SORG.30 lb. 43 SET ASIDE OAST 4 ARE 55 SET ASIDE UPLAND 9.5 ARE 55 SEVIN INSET lb. 45 TREFLAN HERB 6. 4 qt. 45 VET. MEDIINE 6.00 head 48 ZIN HELATE. 3 pint 45 ZIN SULFATE 3 lb. 45 Information prasontad is praparad solely as a general guide and Is not intondad to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch oparation. Thaso projoctions woro collected and dovelopad by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extansion Sarvice and approvad for publication. 40
20 ^jfps\ AUTO OR TRUK RESOURES OTOBER 4, 99 DESRIPTION QUALIFYING NAME KORSEPOHER RATING (HP) REHAINING LIFE (HR OR HI) FUEL ON. (UNIT/HR OR /HI) SPEED (HI/H) FIELD EFFIIENY (X) APAITY (A/HR) POHER UNIT HULTIPLIER LABOR HULTIPLIER URRENT LIST PRIE S A L V A G E V A L U E ( X ) URRENT HARKET VALUE L E A S E P A Y H E N T ( $ ) ANNUAL LIENSE & TAX A N N U A L I N S U R A N E ( $ ) ON FARH HIRED LABOR (HR) F FARH PARTS & LABOR REPAIR OEFFIIENT # DEPREIATION FATOR # REPAIR OEFFIIENT 8 DEPREIATION FATOR 8 APAITY (DEF.,AL.) F U E L U S E ( D E F., A L. ) R & H A L. ( 8, 8 ) LEASE AL. (HOUR,YEAR) AUTO OR TRUK PIKUP TRUK 3/4 TON GA Information prasontad is prepared solely as a general guide and is not intended to recognize or predict the costs and returns from any ono particular farm or ranch oparation. Those projections were collected and developed by staff members of the Texas Agricultural Extension Service and approved for publication. 4
21 USTOM OPERATION RESOURES October 4, 99 ustom Operation Price Unit ash per of Flow Unit Measure Row BAGGINGi & TIES 3.00 bale 4 BRUSH LEARING 75 acre 4 OMBINING GRASS.75 acre 4 UST AIR FERT. RIE 3.00 cwt. 4 UST AIR HERB. RIE 3.85 cwt. 4 UST AIR INSET. RIE.50 cwt. 4 UST AIR SEED RIE 3.40 cwt. 4 USTOM BALING ALFALFA 5.00 ton 4 USTOM BALING HAY bale 4 USTOM HARVEST SORGHUM 5. acre 4 USTOM HARVEST SOYBEANS.50 bu. 4 USTOM HARVEST WHEAT 7.50 acre 4 USTOM HAUL FLAX. 5 bu. 4 USTOM HAUL HAY.40 bale 4 USTOM HAUL PEANUTS.40 cwt. 4 USTOM HAUL SORGHUM.5 cwt. 4 USTOM HAUL SOYBEANS.0 bu. 4 USTOM HAUL WATMELON 3.5 cwt. 4 USTOM HAULING RIE.30 cwt. 4 USTOM HAULING WHEAT.5 bu. 4 USTOM PLANTING 5.08 acre 4 USTOM SPRIGGING 36. acre 4 DEFOLIANT APPL acre 4 DRYING PEANUTS 0 ton 4 DRYING RIE. cwt. 4 FERTILIZER APPL..75 acre 4 FUNGIIDE APPL..75 acre 4 GINNING.75 cwt. 4 HAND HARVEST 6 acre 4 HARVEST & HAUL ORN.70 cwt. 4 HARVEST & HAUL SORGHUM 5 cwt. 4 HAULING OTTON.0 cwt 4 HAULING & MKTNG. 5 head 4 HERBIIDE APPL acre 4 INSETIIDE APPL.50 appl 4 MOW, RAKE, BALE 9 bale 4 PESTIIDE APPL acre 4 PIK & MODULE OTTON 3.00 cwt. 4 SOUTING 4.00 acre 4 STRIP & MODULE OTTON.00 cwt. 4 Information prasontad is praparad solely as a general guide and Is not Intended to recognize or predict tho costs and returns from any one particular farm or ranch operation. These projections wero collected and developed by staff mambars of the Taxas Agricultural Extansion Service and approved for publication. 4
22 Information prasontad is praparad solely as a goneral guide and is not Intandod to recognize or predict the costs and raturns from any ono particular farm or ranch oparation. These projections were collected and developed by staff mambars of tha Toxas Agricultural Extension Sorvico and approved for publication. 43 LABOR RESOURES OTOBER 4, 99 DESRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR OST OR VALUE ($/HR) TOTAL HAGE BENEFITS (X) L A B O R T Y P E ( A, B ) HAND HOEING 5.00 A HIRED LABOR LIVESTOK LABOR OPERATOR LABOR A A B OPERATOR LABOR PIKUP 5.5 B
TEXAS UPPER COAST H-4-++H DISTRICT T-+- J L L
1-44-+- H-4-++H T J L L T TEXAS UPPER COAST DISTRICT 11 -+++- -+++--++T-+- -+++--+++- B-124KC11) TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE. THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Z e r l e L. C a r p e n t e r, D
More informationPROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY COASTAL PLAIN CORN, COASTAL BEND REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE
PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 10/ 09/ 80 COASTAL PLAIN CORN, COASTAL BEND REGION B-1241 (C18) CATEGORY 1 GROSS RECEIPTS CORN TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS 2 VARIABLE
More informationProjections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after April 23, 1987,
/^\ GROSS INCOME Description BSSBSBESSSSBESSSSSSSSSSSS SUNFLOWERS Total GROSS Income VARIABLE COST Description SSSSSSSSBBBSSSSSBSBBSSSSBSSSSBSSS PREHARVEST SOIL TEST NITROGEN FERTILIZER APPL. HERBICIDE
More informationTractors, Implements, and Equipment
Crop Products Report Crop Product Name CORN-COASTAL UP. CORN-GULF COAST COTTON LINT COTTON RICE 1ST CROP LOAN RICE ND CROP LOAN RICE PREMIUM SORGHUM SOYBEANS Price Unit Weight Cash per of per Flow Unit
More informationTEXAS UPPER COAST SOIL RESOURCE AREA 21
TEXAS UPPER COAST SOIL RESOURCE AREA 21 r B-124KC21) TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE. THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Z e r l e L. C a r p e n t e r. D i r e c t o r. C o l l e g e S t a t i o n,
More informationTexas Coastal Bend District
I Texas Agricultural Extension Service W The Texas A&M University System B-1241(C11) Texas Crop Enterprise Budgets Texas Coastal Bend District Wash ington Fayette Austin Colorado Lavaca Wharton Karnes
More information660 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 02/22/83. B-1241(C14)
660 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 02/22/83. B-1241(C14) OATS, DRYLAND, TEXAS GRANDE PRAIRIE REGION CATEGORY YOUR GROSS RECEIPTS OATS YIELD 75.00 UNIT BU.
More informationTEXAS UPPER COAST SOIL RESOURCE AREA 21
r TEXAS UPPER COAST SOIL RESOURCE AREA 21 r r B-124KC21) TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE. THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Z o r l e L. C a r p e n t e r, D i r e c t o r. C o l l a g e S t a t i o
More informationTEXAS EDWARDS PLATEAU WESTERN
r r TEXAS EDWARDS PLATEAU WESTERN FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Edwards Plateau-Western Region are based on yields, pro duction input quantities, and production practices which represent the
More informationTexas Agricultural Extension Service The Texas A&M University System
/ Texas Agricultural Extension Service The Texas A&M University System Texas Crop Enterprise Budgets South Texas District Projected for 1996 Merritt J. Taylor, District 12 Extension Economist-Management
More informationSTOCKER CALF PRODUCTION TEXAS RIO GRANCE REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER STCCKER IMPROVED IRRIGATED PASTURE UNIT
STOCKER CALF PRODUCTION TEXAS RIO GRANCE REGION ESTIMATED S AND RETURNS PER STCCKER IMPROVED IRRIGATED PASTURE I TEM WEIGHT EACH PRICE OR / GROSS RECEIPTS SLAUGHTER HEIFER TCTAL 650.00 LBS. 0.42 1.00 213*0,9-273.00
More information-9- COASTAL BERMUDAGRASS HAY, DRYLAND, TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIE REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT
-9- COASTAL BERMUDAGRASS HAY, DRYLAND, TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIE REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS
More informationDryland Bermuda Enterprise Budget - Hay Only 1000 acres farmed, 160 acres for this budget. OSU Name. OKLAHOMA COOPERATIVE Farm Description
Dryland Bermuda Enterprise Budget - Hay Only 1000 acres farmed, 160 acres for this budget OSU Name OKLAHOMA COOPERATIVE Farm Description EXTENSION SERVICE Total PRODUCTION Units Price Quantity $/Acre Hay
More informationSOUTH TEXAS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 17
SOUTH TEXAS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 17 r B-124KC17) TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE. THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Z e r l e L. C a r p e n t e r, D i r e c t o r C o l l e g e S t a t i o n, T e x a
More informationOSU Name. OKLAHOMA COOPERATIVE Farm Description
Dryland Cotton Enterprise Budget 1000 acres farmed, 160 acres for this budget OSU Name OKLAHOMA COOPERATIVE Farm Description EXTENSION SERVICE Total PRODUCTION Units Price Quantity $/Acre Cotton Lint Lbs
More informationEDWARDS AQUIFER FOREWORD
r EDWARDS AQUIFER FOREWORD 16000300 r The data contained in this report are based on estimates and actual records of operations within an area described as the Edwards Aquifer. This area is composed primarily
More informationCalculating Hay Harvesting Costs. Kathleen Painter, PhD Ag. Extension Educator
Calculating Hay Harvesting Costs Kathleen Painter, PhD Ag. Extension Educator What are some reasons you might want to know your hay harvesting costs? Today s machinery costs are very high. Does it pay
More informationCOASTAL BERMUDAGRASS PASTURE, DRYLAND, TEXAS BLACKLAND REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT
COASTAL BERMUDAGRASS PASTURE, DRYLAND, TEXAS BLACKLAND REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT OPERATICN ITEM NO. DATE FUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OVER HCURS
More informationEmployee Liability Insurance $/$1,000 wages $ Employee Benefits percent/wages 18.00% Labor Downtime percent 25.00%
TABLE 1. Acreage Summary, Union County, TABLE 2. Basic cost information for Dry Cimarron area, Union County, BUDGET AREA DRY CIMARRON AREA, UNION COUNTY FARM SIZE. 80 ACRES Item IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER
More information400 BL D D D D
Description Firsc Name H o r s e p o w e r R a t i n g ( H p ) U s e f u l L i f e ( H r o r M i ) Puel Type Remaining Life (Hr or Mi) Puel Con. (Unit/Hr or /Mi) A n n u a l U s e ( H r o r M i ) Speed
More informationUNIT. FROM PRODUCTION CWT x22
36 r WATERMELONS, NORTHEAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/ QUANTITY COST 1. GROSS RECEIPTS WATERMELONS FROM PRODUCTION CWT 3.00 120.00-362x22
More informationPERMANENT PASTURE. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT
45 PERMANENT PASTURE. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS II REGION P R I C E O R V A L U E O R UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0.0 VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST FERT IN) APPL'D
More informationTo: Logansport Savings Bank Name Birth Date Address Co-Owner Birth Date Telephone No. Date of Financial Statement (Use Nearest $)
To: Logansport Savings Bank Name Birth Date Address Co-Owner Birth Date Telephone No. Date of Financial Statement (Use Nearest $) ASSETS LIABILITIES Current Assets Cash on Hand Deposits - Current Liabilities
More informationALFALFA,IRRIGATED, TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE
ALFALFA,IRRIGATED, TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER - FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB,REP COSTS OPERATION NO DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER PER OCT 0 0125 00 040 025
More information2017 Kentucky Blackberry Cost and Return Estimates
ID-149 University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment Cooperative Extension Service 2017 Kentucky Blackberry and Return Estimates FOR THORNY, THORNLESS ERECT, AND THORNLESS SEMI-ERECT
More informationArizona Field Crop Budgets Cochise County
Arizona Field Crop Budgets 1999-2000 Cochise County Trent Teegerstrom Research Specialist and Lee Clark Director Safford Agricultural Center March 1999 Cooperative Extension The University of Arizona College
More informationNo September CROPS AND LIVESTOCK BUDGETS ESTIMATES FOR MICHIGAN by Barbara Dartt Gerald D. Schwab
Agricultural Economics Report No. 609 September 2001 2001 CROPS AND LIVESTOCK BUDGETS ESTIMATES FOR MICHIGAN by Barbara Dartt Gerald D. Schwab Department of Agricultural Economics MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
More informationMACH ITEH OPER TIMES LABCR MACHINE OPER LABOR NO. MONTH OVER HOURS HOURS COSTS COSTS
5 5 7 P R O J E C T I O N F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O E O N L Y NOT TO BE UED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 02/18/82 HYBRID UDAN HAY, DRYLAND, TEXA GRAND PRAIRIE REGION ^ HACHINERY OPERATION ITEH OPER TIME
More informationNorth West North Dakota
EC1657 December 2014 Projected 2015 Crop Budgets North West North Dakota Andrew Swenson, Farm Management Specialist Ron Haugen, Farm Management Specialist The 2015 crop budgets provide an estimate of revenues
More informationWhole Farm Budgeting for Grain Farms
Whole Farm Budgeting for Grain Farms James B. Johnson Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics Montana State University - Bozeman December 6/7, 1999 In cooperation with Montana MarketManager
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SAMPLE COSTS TO ESTABLISH AND PRODUCE PASTURE
PA-NC-02 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION 2002 SAMPLE COSTS TO ESTABLISH AND PRODUCE PASTURE NORTH COAST Mendocino County Prepared by: John M. Harper Karen M. Klonsky Richard L. De Moura
More informationProjected 2010 Crop Budgets North Central North Dakota
December 2009 Projected 2010 Crop Budgets North Central North Dakota Andrew Swenson, Farm Management Specialist Ron Haugen, Farm Management Specialist The 2010 crop budgets provide an estimate of revenues
More informationSouth East North Dakota
EC1659 January 2017 Projected 2017 Crop Budgets Note: This region consists of six counties: Barnes, Dickey, LaMoure, Ransom, Sargent and Steele. South East North Dakota Andrew Swenson, Farm Management
More informationEast Central North Dakota
EC1658 December 2014 Projected 2015 Crop Budgets Note: This region consists of five counties: Eddy, Foster, Griggs, Stutsman and Wells. East Central North Dakota Andrew Swenson, Farm Management Specialist
More informationNorth Central North Dakota
EC1654 December 2014 Projected 2015 Crop Budgets North Central North Dakota Andrew Swenson, Farm Management Specialist Ron Haugen, Farm Management Specialist The 2015 crop budgets provide an estimate of
More informationNorth Central North Dakota
EC1654 January 2017 Projected 2017 Crop Budgets North Central North Dakota Andrew Swenson, Farm Management Specialist Ron Haugen, Farm Management Specialist The 2017 crop budgets provide an estimate of
More informationNorth West North Dakota
EC1657 December 2018 Projected 2019 Crop Budgets North West North Dakota Andrew Swenson, Farm Management Specialist The contributions of NDSU Extension Specialists: Ron Haugen, Frayne Olson, Janet Knodel,
More informationGary Brester James B. Johnson
Managing Rangeland and Forage Production Risks Gary Brester James B. Johnson MSU Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics Montana MarketManager Interactive Video Conference Collaborating Partners:
More informationSouth West North Dakota
EC1652 December 2018 Projected 2019 Crop Budgets South West North Dakota Andrew Swenson, Farm Management Specialist The contributions of NDSU Extension Specialists: Ron Haugen, Frayne Olson, Janet Knodel,
More informationBeef Cow/Calf, Projected Budget for Calves Sold in 2015, South Missouri
Beef Cow/Calf, Projected Budget for Calves Sold in 2015, South Missouri Fall 14 Spring 15 Calving Calving Calf crop, % weaned 88% 85% Steer calf sales: 580 lbs. @ $250/cwt. x 85% x 1/2 -- $ 616.25 580
More informationCost Concepts Key Questions Chapter 9, pp
Cost Concepts Key Questions Chapter 9, pp. 137-141 How do operating and ownership costs differ? How are ownership costs calculated? In the short run? In the long run? How do cash and noncash costs differ?
More informationEast Central North Dakota
EC1658 December 2017 Projected 2018 Crop Budgets Note: This region consists of five counties: Eddy, Foster, Griggs, Stutsman and Wells. East Central North Dakota Andrew Swenson, Farm Management Specialist
More informationNorth West North Dakota
EC1657 December 2017 Projected 2018 Crop Budgets North West North Dakota Andrew Swenson, Farm Management Specialist The contributions of NDSU Extension Specialists: Ron Haugen, Frayne Olson, Janet Knodel,
More informationFLUE-CURED TOBACCO BUDGET INFORMATION Eric Eberly, Retired Extension Agent, Farm Business Management
FLUE-CURED TOBACCO BUDGET INFORMATION Eric Eberly, Retired Extension Agent, Farm Business Management Introduction The flue-cured tobacco budget is an estimate of the costs to produce 2500 pounds of marketable
More informationNorth Central North Dakota
EC1654 December 2018 Projected 2019 Crop Budgets North Central North Dakota Andrew Swenson, Farm Management Specialist The contributions of NDSU Extension Specialists: Ron Haugen, Frayne Olson, Janet Knodel,
More information2014 Farm Bill Overview
2014 Farm Bill Overview Presented as part of a panel discussion at the City Bank Wealth of Knowledge Seminar Series, March 31, 2014 Key Elements Dairy Program Dairy Product Support and MILC programs replaced
More information(p all of the above are methods
Economics 330 Fall 2004 Exam 2 October 18, 2004 Name ~ 1 Part I: Multiple Choice. Circle the best answer (3 points each). 1. Reasons why you would replace machinery would include: a. it is too small. b.
More informationFarm Income Statement 2015 Moorhead Farm Business Management Annual Report (Farms Sorted By Net Farm Income) Number of farms
Farm Income Statement Cash Farm Income Barley 5,929 2,010 - - 12,581 14,753 Beans, Black Turtle 350 - - - - 1,723 Beans, Navy 3,627 13,512 - - 5,385 - Corn 168,160 172,777 84,655 79,253 289,902 214,568
More information2006 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper December, 2007
2006 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh Staff Paper 2007-11 December, 2007 Department of Agricultural Economics MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY East Lansing,
More informationArizona Vegetable Crop Budgets. Central Arizona Maricopa County
1998-99 Arizona Vegetable Crop Budgets Central Arizona Maricopa County Trent Teegerstrom Research Specialist and Kai Umeda Vegetable Crop Agent Maricopa County January 1999 Cooperative Extension The University
More information2009 Michigan Upper Peninsula Dairy Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2010
2009 Michigan Upper Peninsula Dairy Business Analysis Summary Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf Staff Paper 2010-08 December, 2010 Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics MICHIGAN STATE
More informationSouth Central North Dakota
EC1653 December 2018 Projected 2019 Crop Budgets South Central North Dakota Andrew Swenson, Farm Management Specialist Note: This region consists of six counties: Burleigh, Emmons, Kidder, Logan, McIntosh
More informationNorth Central North Dakota
EC1654 December 2017 Projected 2018 Crop Budgets North Central North Dakota Andrew Swenson, Farm Management Specialist The contributions of NDSU Extension Specialists: Ron Haugen, Frayne Olson, Janet Knodel,
More informationEconomics 330 Spring 2000 Exam la. Production should continue in the long run as long as revenue will cover all costs.
~.,., " PART I. Indicate the best answer. Economics 330 Spring 2000 Exam la Name Lab: Lecture: T W R 11:00 2:00 True or False (2pts. each) @F 1. T (j) 2. T@3. & F 4. T~5. Production should continue in
More informationPRF Insurance: background
Rainfall Index and Margin Protection Insurance Plans 2017 Ag Lenders Conference Garden City, KS October 2017 Dr. Monte Vandeveer KSU Extension Agricultural Economist PRF Insurance: background Pasture,
More informationJuab County Crop Production Costs and Returns, 2011
June 2012 Applied Economics/201207pr Juab County Crop Production Costs and Returns, 2011 Jeffrey Banks, Extension Associate Professor, Juab County Kynda Curtis, Associate Professor and Extension Specialist,
More informationCrop Cash Flow and Enterprise Information - step two for your 2017 farm analysis
Name Address County Phone Email Operator #1 Year Born Year Started Farming Operator #2 Year Born Year Started Farming Operator #3 Year Born Year Started Farming Crop Cash Flow and Enterprise Information
More informationAgricultural Act of 2014
Farm Bill Cash Flow 2017 Outlook Conference for Agricultural Lenders Grand Forks Oct. 16 Fargo Oct. 31 Andrew Swenson Extension Farm Management Specialist Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SAMPLE COSTS TO PRODUCE FIELD CORN SACRAMENTO VALLEY - YOLO COUNTY
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION 2000 SAMPLE COSTS TO PRODUCE FIELD CORN SACRAMENTO VALLEY - YOLO COUNTY Prepared by: Tom Kearney Karen M. Klonsky Richard L. De Moura Farm Advisor, UC Cooperative
More information2014 Farm Bill Update. International Crop Expo February 19, 2015
2014 Farm Bill Update International Crop Expo February 19, 2015 Decisions Operators and Owners Need to Make Yield Update Base Reallocation Choice of Safety Net Yield Update Everyone should attempt to update
More informationCotton Enterprise Budget Database
Cotton Enterprise Budget Database Developed by: Lawrence Falconer, Mississippi State University Extension Service and Dr. Jeanne Reeves, Cotton, Incorporated Sponsored by: Cotton, Incorporated Dr. Jeanne
More informationFarm Enterprise Budgeting: Should I Grow Corn, Convert to Pasture
Farm Enterprise Budgeting: Should I Grow Corn, Convert to Pasture or? Paul Dietmann, Emerging Markets Specialist Badgerland Financial Paul.dietmann@badgerlandfinancial.com WI Land + Water Conservation
More informationEnterprise budgets. Alice Topaloff ISU Extension and Outreach Local Foods
Enterprise budgets Alice Topaloff ISU Extension and Outreach Local Foods Topaloff@iastate.edu Enterprise budgets + Balance sheets Budgeting Estimate financial needs and feasibility Monitor economic efficiency
More informationRevenue and Costs for Corn, Soybeans, Wheat, and Double-Crop Soybeans, Actual for 2011 through 2016, Projected 2017 and 2018
CROP COSTS Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics University of Illinois Revenue and Costs for Corn, Soybeans, Wheat, and Double-Crop Soybeans, Actual for 2011 through 2016, Projected 2017 and
More informationFUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB..REP. COSTS OPERATION NO* OATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE
16 CORN FOR SILAGE. FURROW IRRIGAt&t. (NATURAL GAS). TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I REGION E S T I M A T E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E > - % HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT 1 FUEL.OIL. FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR
More informationRevenue and Costs for Illinois Grain Crops, Actual for 2012 through 2017, Projected 2018 and 2019
CROP COSTS Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics University of Illinois Revenue and Costs for Illinois Grain Crops, Actual for 2012 through 2017, Projected 2018 and 2019 Department of Agricultural
More information2015 Iowa Farm Business Management Career Development Event. INDIVIDUAL EXAM (150 pts.)
2015 Iowa Farm Business Management Career Development Event INDIVIDUAL EXAM (150 pts.) Select the best answer to each of the 75 questions to follow (2 pts. ea.). Code your answers on the answer sheet provided.
More informationUnderstanding Markets and Marketing
Art Understanding Markets and Marketing Randy Fortenbery School of Economic Sciences College of Agricultural, Human, and Natural Resource Sciences Washington State University The objective of marketing
More informationGrand County Crop Production Costs and Returns, 2013
December 2013 Applied Economics/2013/10pr Grand County Crop Production Costs and Returns, 2013 Michael Johnson, Extension Associate Professor, Grand County Kynda Curtis, Associate Professor and Extension
More informationFarm Land Value Farm Profitability
Farm Land Value Farm Profitability Dennis Stein, Farm Management March 5, 2014 MSU is an affirmative-action, equal-opportunity employer. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open
More informationSeed Cotton Informational Meeting. Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
Seed Cotton Informational Meeting Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) PLC Overview PLC is an Income Support Program PLC payments are not dependent upon planting of the crop PLC is the default program election
More informationBeaver County Crop Production Costs and Returns, 2012
April 2013 Applied Economics/201304pr Beaver County Crop Production Costs and Returns, 2012 Mark Nelson, Extension Associate Professor, Beaver County Kynda Curtis, Associate Professor and Extension Specialist,
More informationIntroduction & Calculations
Introduction & Calculations Arizona farmers make substantial investments in machinery and equipment as they strive to increase productivity and reduce costs. This publication provides equipment cost information
More informationABCs of Farming - Copyright Wittman Consulting 1. ABCs of Farming. Value of Information
ABCs of Farming Activity Based Costing What Is It? - Activity based approach to tracking cost of production Examples Crop Operation: Pre-plant ground preparation Seeding/Fertilization Pest Control Harvest
More informationEnding Balance Sheet Page 13 of 21
Farm Name Ending Balance Sheet Page 13 of 21 Current Assets Ending Balance Sheet Date: / / 201 Schedule A: Cash, Savings, and Checking Farm cash, checking and savings account balances as of the balance
More informationNorthwestern Nevada Teff Production Costs and Returns, 2008
Special Publication-08-13 Northwestern Nevada Teff Production Costs and Returns, 2008 Kynda R. Curtis, Agriculture Marketing Specialist, University of Nevada Cooperative Extension; and Assistant Professor,
More informationCache County Crop Production Costs and Returns, 2011
June 2012 Applied Economics/201205pr Cache County Crop Production Costs and Returns, 2011 Clark Israelsen, Extension Associate Professor, Cache County Kynda Curtis, Associate Professor and Extension Specialist,
More informationWhitney Wiegel Agricultural Business Specialist University of Missouri Extension
Whitney Wiegel Agricultural Business Specialist University of Missouri Extension www.extension.missouri.edu Resources: Labor & Management Capital Land Farm Goals: Lifestyle Benefits Income Growth Know
More informationFile: Organic_Dairy_Transition User: Tim Beck, Penn State Cooperative Extension FINPACK Printed 11/05/2007 3:18:10 PM
Organic_Dairy_Transition FINLRB: Options File: Organic_Dairy_Transition User: Tim Beck, FINPACK Printed 11/05/2007 3:18:10 PM PLAN DESCRIPTION Buy Corn $25 Milk $27 Milk $29 Milk Organic Total crop acres
More information2014 Dairy Farm Business Summary
Cornell Cooperative Extension Prepared by Department of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University 214 Dairy Farm Business Summary Farm Educator 2/8/215 Progress of the Farm Business SELECTED
More informationA B C D E F G H I Dairy Code: XXX Dairy Business Analysis Project version 8/19/2002 Page 1 Dairy Description /16/2002
1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 A B C D E F G H I Dairy Code: XXX Dairy Business Analysis Project version /1/00 Page 1 Dairy Description 001 /1/00 Milk Production Prod. Record. System Milking System Milking Frequency
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SAMPLE COSTS TO ESTABLISH AND PRODUCE TIMOTHYGRASS HAY INTERMOUNTAIN REGION SHASTA LASSEN COUNTIES
TG-IR-09 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION 2009 SAMPLE COSTS TO ESTABLISH AND PRODUCE TIMOTHYGRASS HAY Prepared by: SHASTA LASSEN COUNTIES Daniel B. Marcum Karen M. Klonsky Pete Livingston
More informationNorthwestern Nevada Great Basin Wild Rye Establishment, Production Costs and Returns, 2008
Special Publication-08-11 Northwestern Nevada Great Basin Wild Rye Establishment, Production Costs and Returns, 2008 Kynda R. Curtis, Agriculture Marketing Specialist, University of Nevada Cooperative
More informationCROP BUDGETS, ILLINOIS, 2018
CROP BUDGETS Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics University of Illinois CROP BUDGETS, ILLINOIS, 2018 Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics University of Illinois February 2018
More informationCROP BUDGETS, ILLINOIS, 2017
CROP BUDGETS Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics University of Illinois CROP BUDGETS, ILLINOIS, 2017 Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics University of Illinois July 2017 Introduction
More informationCROP BUDGETS, ILLINOIS, 2019
CROP BUDGETS Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics University of Illinois CROP BUDGETS, ILLINOIS, 2019 Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics University of Illinois September 2018
More informationFarm Financial Management Case: Mayer Farm 2013
Farm Financial Management Case: Mayer Farm 2013 The Mayer Farm Case is provided to you as an alternative to using your own financial data. Using the Mayer Farm Case data you can complete the following
More informationInput Costs for 2011
Input Costs for 2011 Andrew Swenson Extension Farm Management Specialist Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics North Dakota State University Historic Enterprise Analysis from North Dakota Farm
More informationBudget Analysis: Why and how to estimate costs of production
Budget Analysis: Why and how to estimate costs of production Kate Binzen Fuller, Ph.D. Asst. Professor/Extension Specialist Dept. of Ag Econ & Econ, MSU Extension Montana State University With help from:
More information2005 Michigan Feeder Steers Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg and Roy Black. Staff Paper December, 2006
2005 Michigan Feeder Steers Business Analysis Summary Eric Wittenberg and Roy Black Staff Paper 2006-31 December, 2006 Department of Agricultural Economics MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY East Lansing, Michigan
More informationBusiness Planning & Budgeting
Business Planning & Budgeting Beef 101 Peggy Murray Farm Business Educator Jefferson & Lewis Counties mlm40@cornell.edu 315 376-5270 Sponsored by: New York Beef Producers Business Planning Why What How
More informationCommodity Programs in 2014 Farm Bill. Key Provisions
Commodity Programs in 2014 Farm Bill Gary Schnitkey, Jonathan Coppess, Nick Paulson, and Carl Zulauf University of Illinois The Ohio State University (February 13, 2014) 1 Key Provisions Eliminates direct,
More informationStatement of Assets Client: as of. Current Assets. INTERMEDIATE ASSETS: Breeding Livestock. Market Livestock. Farm Machinery
Statement of Assets as of Current Assets Current Assets Cash on hand Investments Accounts Receivable Supplies Prepaid Expenses Growing Crops Current Assets Grain & Hay Inventory Grain & Hay on Hand Quantity
More informationShould I Buy Stocker Calves This Fall or a Fishing License?
Should I Buy Stocker Calves This Fall or a Fishing License? Ona Report Webinar September 15, 2016 Chris Prevatt University of Florida Livestock and Forage Economist Stocker Marketing Options We must consider:
More informationAccrued rents & Lease payments Other (including relatives)
Balance Sheet Financial Statement Name: As Of: Name Home Phone: Address: Email Address First Merchants Bank SSN# Cell Phone: SSN# Cell Phone: Current Assets Market Value Current Liabilities Market Value
More informationCredit Analysis Solutions AGRICULTURE
Credit Analysis Solutions AGRICULTURE University of Minnesota 130 Ruttan Hall 1994 Buford Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 Phone: (612) 625-1964 Toll-Free: (800) 234-1111 Fax: (612) 625-3105 Email: FINPACK@umn.edu
More informationWHAT IS YOUR COST OF PRODUCTION?
chapter four WHAT IS YOUR COST OF PRODUCTION? Gayle Willett 2 3 3 4 6 14 21 22 23 Table of Contents Instructor Guidelines Introduction Meet Profit Farms Understanding Production Costs Two Approaches for
More informationCflASTAL BFRMUOAGRASS ESTABLISHMENT, DRYLAND, TFXAS ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT
CflASTAL BFRMUOAGRASS ESTABLISHMENT, DRYLAND, TFXAS TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OP COST 1. GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION 0.0 2. VARIABLE COSTS F E RT ( 7 5-4 0-0 ) CUSTOM
More informationThe Story of Remington Farms LLC
2015 National FFA Remington Farms LLC Resource Information Farm Business Management Career Development Event The Story of Remington Farms LLC Trevor and Emma live in the upper Midwest where they own and
More information2008 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONTEST
2008 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONTEST The information in this section will be used to complete the problem-solving portion of the Farm Management Test. In the balance sheet analysis, you will
More information