Ocean and Islands (OI) Resource Use Solutions Monitoring Physical and Chemical Change Ocean Governance / Maritime Boundaries

Transcription

1 SOPAC s Work Programme Ocean and Islands (OI) Resource Use Solutions Monitoring Physical and Chemical Change Ocean Governance / Maritime Boundaries Community Lifelines (CL) Water & Sanitation Energy GIS / Remote Sensing ICT Outreach (policy & advocacy) Climate & Met data & Climate update Community Risk (CR) Strengthening resilience to disasters Mitigating the effects of hazards Mainstreaming disaster risk management

2 Statistics SOPAC - Comparitive total budget Comparitive Staff No. Comparitive membership contribution to total budget $ million USD $100 $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 SOPAC Staff No SOPAC $ million USD % 4.4% 15.6% SOPAC 26% Member & other 35% Australia 3% Member & other 12% GEF SOPAC 14% Australia 8% New Zealand 51% Member & other 15% Australia 12% New Zealand 8% EU 10% New Zealand 20% Global Fund 63% EU 20% GEF 2% EU

3 Service Delivery : Corporate Support staff numbers Corporate Support 18% SOPAC Corporate Support 25% Corporate Support 52% Technical Delivery 82% Technical Delivery 75% Technical Delivery 48% 4.6 : : : 1

4 Organisational Growth Comparitive cumulative total budget growth (percentage) Averaged annual growth trends over last 5 years; SOPAC % SOPAC 21.0% - 2.6%

5 Key Guiding Principles p4 Rationalisation should not subject the SOPAC Core Work Programme to fragmentation The excellent science being mobilised through the STAR network must be retained as a highly valued resource for the region The rationalisation of SOPAC core functions into and/or, should occur without any substantive diminution in SOPAC function, rather, rationalisation should result in improved service delivery

6 Rationalisation of SOPAC s Functions 1. ICT 2. Energy 3. SOPAC Core Functions

7 Rationalisation of SOPAC Functions SOPAC ICT GIS/RS outreach Outreach GIS/RS Energy Energy M&E (GHG & CDM) PI GOOS Is. Climate Update Climate & Met. Data Core applied science & technical functions

8 Independent Consultancy & CEOs Developed and considered TWO options Option 1. To integrate mandates and core functions of SOPAC and into a reformed rebranded organisation reformed,rebranded environment and natural resources management organisation SOPAC

9 Independent Consultancy & CEOs Developed and considered TWO options Option 2. To rationalise SOPAC core functions into as a new Applied Science and Technical Division SOPAC

10 Preferred Option Shared with and SOPAC on the 22 nd June 2009 Unable to subject to comprehensive comparative analysis to absorb SOPAC core functions in January 2010 SOPAC

11 Financial Implications USD$ USD$ One One off off costs Recurrent costs RRO* RRO** SOPAC core as a division SOPAC of * core as a Division of ** preferred option* preferred option ** Without CROP Harmonisation

12 Financial Implications (with CROP Harmonised Remuneration) Year RRO* SOPAC core as a division of * preferred option*

13 Financial Implications (without CROP Harmonised Remuneration) Year RRO** SOPAC core as a division of ** preferred option**

14 Comprehensive Risk Analysis CROP harmonised Partner staff Agreements renumeration Programme Key and technical Project personnel Funding Assets - procument Agency and status maintenance w ith EU Proposed institutional arrangement Strategic (members) Planner Amendments Corporate and to institutional Agreement memory CROP Harmonised Staff Fiji Remuneration annual grant Assets - procurement and maintenance STAR/PMEG Members' Partner Contribution Relations Conflict of interests (mandates Partner & agreements functions) Programme and Project Suva Campus Funding Diminished service Strategic delivery Plan Diminished Steering service Committee delivery Additional MOU resources betw een organisations (members) Proposed institutional arrangement Staff development (members) MOU betw een Change organisations Leaders STAR/PMEG IMS Intra-campus communications Communications PMS PMS Financial Regulations and Services-best practices Technical Partners' services relationships (modalities) Technical services Executive (modalities) appointment Executive Change appointment Committee Technical publication and editorial Base services Treaty Financial Regulations Key technical and personnel Services Member Strategic Contributions Plan Independent Change M&E Manager services Additional Resources IMS Corporate and institutional Library memory services Conflict of interests (mandates Fiji Annual & functions) Grant ICR Recommendations Strategic Planner Disolve Independent /Suspend SOPAC M&E of Agreement services Strategic direction Direction Financial Regulations Agency and Status Services w ith EU Technical publication and ICR Recommendations editorial services Staff Suva development Campus Amendments to Canberra Library Agreement services Dissolve/Suspend SOPAC Agreement Base Treaty New + ) Pacific Reformed New S&T Division New Division of (SOPAC + ) Islands Rebranded of Applied Geoscience Organisation (SOPAC + Commission (SOPAC ) + ) 46% less risk to SOPAC service delivery 3% Member & other 12% Difference in GEF risk between options 63% EU SOPAC 14% Australia % New Zealand 219% greater risk to SOPAC service delivery

15 Rationalisation of SOPAC Functions SOPAC ICT GIS/RS outreach Outreach GIS/RS Energy Energy M&E (GHG/CDM) PI GOOS Is. Climate Update Climate & Met. Data Core applied science & technical functions

16 Retention of SOPAC Integrated Core is essential, irrespective of its ultimate branding There is universal agreement that RIF must not result in diminution of SOPAC service delivery to members SOPAC SOPAC Integrated Solutions SOPAC Integrated Solutions SOPAC Integrated SOPAC Integrated Solutions Community Lifelines Solutions Community Risks Oceans & Islands Community Lifelines Oceans & Islands Oceans & Islands Oceans & Islands Community Lifelines Community Lifelines

17 INTEGRATED SOLUTION Flood assessment Outcomes results IWRM; P-HYCOS Hydrological GIS to underpin assessment various assessments Community Lifelines Programme Hydrological Socioeconomic modelling assessment Oceans and Islands Programme Coordination of Hazard National tech Assessment support action Identification planning, DRM of assessment needs Community Risk Programme

18 Recommendation RIF Rationale objectives and Basis - improved Independent service consultants delivery reports to members - cost SOPAC Science effectiveness due and diligence Technical for members assessment Division & of donors - minimal diminution of SOPAC service delivery to members Rationalise SOPAC core functions into an Applied