The Effects of Student Loans on Long-Term Household Financial Stability
|
|
|
- Jasper Cobb
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Effects of Student Loans on Long-Term Household Financial Stability Dora Gicheva 1 Jeffrey Thompson 2 1 UNC Greensboro 2 Federal Reserve Board October 26, 2013 Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
2 Introduction Motivation Unintended consequences of student loan program that we should be aware of Need to take into account all costs for cost-benefit analysis Less is known about long-term consequences of holding student debt Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
3 Introduction Motivation Are growing debt burdens in the right tail of the distribution manageable? Should not ignore positive return to student borrowing What about borrowers who do not complete degree? Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
4 Introduction Research Questions How do student borrowers fare financially after graduation, compared to similar non-borrowers? Are borrowers who do not complete Bachelor s degree more likely to experience financial hardship? How can we address bias from omitted variables and simultaneity/reverse causality? Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
5 Introduction Empirical Approach Data from Survey of Consumer Finances Student loans that originated between 1970 and 2010 Observe outcomes in Instrument for amount borrowed using variations in aggregate borrowing trends Exogenous policy-induced changes in eligibility and take-up Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
6 Introduction Overview of Findings Conditional on broad measures of educational attainment, student debt linked to credit constraints and bankruptcy $10,000 in student loans increases probability of being turned down by creditors by about 6 percentage points Home ownership rates may also be affected Relationship stronger for non-completers Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
7 Introduction Post-Graduation Outcomes Affected by Student Debt: Existing Evidence Graduate school attendance (mixed evidence) Career choice and starting salary Specialized studies: Physician specialty choice (limited impact) Law school graduates choice to enter public sector law Entry into marriage Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
8 Methodology Specification Empirical Model Want to estimate Omitted variable bias: E(Y ) = α(loans) + Xβ Student loans correlated with many unobservables that contribute to financial stability Type of education, academic success, family background,... Possible reverse causality Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
9 Methodology Specification Empirical Model Two-stage least squares approach First stage: E(Loans) = Xδ + γz The instrument Z equals average amount borrowed per full-time equivalent student (including non-borrowers) in constant dollars in year when respondent was 17 years old From Trends in Student Aid 2012 Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
10 Methodology Specification Aggregate Borrowing Trends Reauthorizations of the HEA of 1965 New types of aid Expand loan limits and eligibility Interest rate changes Private loan market Increasing gap between costs and grant aid Information availability Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
11 Methodology Specification Aggregate Borrowing Trends Federal/Private Loans per FTE Student $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 Federal Loans per FTE Student Total (Federal+Private) Loans per FTE Student Year Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
12 Methodology Specification Aggregate Borrowing as Instrument Captures exogenous changes in eligibility and take-up rates Relationship between prevalent borrowing behavior in year of high school graduation and individual s borrowing decisions Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
13 Methodology SCF Data Survey of Consumer Finances Sample Six cross-sectional surveys conducted between 1995 and 2010 Full student borrowing histories Very detailed information about assets and liabilities Respondents born in 1954 or later - entered college after 1970 Age 29 or older N = 12, 037 Weights make sample nationally representative Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
14 Methodology SCF Data Student Loans in the SCF All debt accumulated by household members Exact amount and year of each education loan Adjusted for inflation Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
15 Methodology SCF Data Gicheva Borrowing and Thompson is in constant 2010 Student dollars. Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26 Student Loans in the SCF 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% $40.0 $35.0 $30.0 $25.0 $20.0 $15.0 $10.0 $ % Share of PEU with any atudent loan debt Average borrowing ($1,000) among those with debt $0.0
16 Methodology SCF Data Outcomes of Interest Whether denied credit, granted less credit than applied for initially, or did not apply because feared rejection - previous 5 years At least one late payment of bills (60 days or more) - previous 5 years Payment to income ratio over 40% All loans Excluding education loans Excluding education loans and mortgage Whether filed for bankruptcy - previous 10 years Whether owns primary residence Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
17 Methodology SCF Data Summary Statistics, Outcome Variables (N = 12,037) 60.78% 36.76% 8.56% 11.40% 10.77% 2.15% 8.29% Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
18 Methodology SCF Data Summary Statistics, Explanatory Variables (N = 12,037) College degree Masters degree Doctorate Female respondent White Black Hispanic Age 39.5 (7.2) Any college-age kids in PEU (18-24) Disabled (either R or SP) Normal income ($1,000) 86.7 (211.8) Predicted wage ($1,000) 51.6 (65.2) Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
19 Methodology SCF Data Aggregate and Derived Controls Annual average county-level unemployment rate from the BEA County per-capita personal income, relative to national average Predicted wage income Using occupation, demographics, full-time or part-time and self-employment status, years of education Current Population Survey data Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
20 Results Main Sample Results (Second Stage) Denied Credit *** Bankrupt *** Late Payments ** Home Owner Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
21 Results Main Sample Results (Second Stage) Denied Credit *** *** Bankrupt *** *** Late Payments ** ** Home Owner Education X Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
22 Results Main Sample Results (Second Stage) Denied Credit *** *** *** Bankrupt *** *** *** Late Payments ** ** *** Home Owner ** Education X X Disabled X College-age kids X Normal income X Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
23 Results Main Sample Results (Second Stage) Denied Credit *** *** *** ** Bankrupt *** *** *** *** Late Payments ** ** *** Home Owner ** Education X X X Disabled X X College-age kids X X Normal income X X County UR X County income X Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
24 Results Main Sample Results (Second Stage) Denied Credit *** *** *** ** ** Bankrupt *** *** *** *** ** Late Payments ** ** *** Home Owner ** Education X X X X Disabled X X X College-age kids X X X Normal income X X County UR X X County income X X Predicted wage X Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
25 Results Main Sample Results (First Stage) F statistic of excluded instrument Average loans per FTE *** Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
26 Results Main Sample Results (First Stage) F statistic of excluded instrument Average loans per FTE *** Female College degree 3.601*** Masters degree 9.074*** Doctorate 16.15*** White 3.239** Black 4.280** Hispanic Age ** Age sq * Any college-age kids 2.356*** Disabled County relative per-capita income 1.560* County unemployment rate 0.350*** Predicted earnings 0.912*** Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
27 Only 2% of students Results who first Non-completers enrolled at a postsecondary institution than $50,000 by Over 40% did not borrow and another 25% borr Student Debt and College Completion FIGURE 11A Educational Attainment by 2009 of Students First Enrolling in , by Total Amount Borrowed (and Overall Percentage of Students in Debt Category) FIGURE 11B Sector Last Attended Recipients Who First Borrowed (and Overa Attained Bachelor s Degree Attained Associate Degree Attained Certificate No Degree, Still Enrolled No Degree, Left Without Return Total 31% 9% 9% 15% 36% Total Cumulative Debt Level $75,001 or more (1%) $50,001 to $75,000 (1%) $30,001 to $50,000 (5%) $20,001 to $30,000 (8%) $10,001 to $20,000 (16%) $1 to $10,000 (25%) Did Not Borrow (43%) 15% 26% 42% 9% Source: Trends in Student Aid, % 53% 9% 65% 17% 9% 85% 10% 1% 0% 5% 9% 15% 10% 1% 11% 15% 14% 2% 10% 16% 18% 3% 10% 7% 17% 24% 16% 14% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percentage NOTE: Percentages in the parentheses on the vertical axis correspond to percentage of all students with th 43% 43% Cumulative Debt Level $75,001 or More (2%) $50,001 to $75,000 (3%) $25,001 to $50,000 (16%) $1 to $25,000 (42%) Did Not Borrow (36%) Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26 0%
28 Results Non-completers Results by College Completion Status Denied Credit Bankrupt Late Payments Home Owner R or SP attend, drop out R & SP attend, R and/or SP drop out R or SP attend, complete R & SP attend, complete Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
29 Discussion Summary of Findings Student debt likely associated with decreased financial stability Additional $10,000 in student loans predicts 6 percentage point increase in probability of being denied credit over 5 year period and 7 percentage point increase in probability of bankruptcy over 10 year period Borrowers more likely to be late on bill payments Home ownership rates may also be affected Debt management seems particularly hard for non-completers Many confounding factors make establishing causality hard Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
30 Discussion Why Does Student Debt Lead to Observed Financial Distress? Impact on disposable income, combined with liquidity constraints Debt-to-income ratio and mortgage availability Changing aggregate labor market conditions? If continued decline in the returns to postsecondary education combined with policy-induced increase in borrowing Unlikely - evidence of increasing high school-college wage differential Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
31 Discussion Why Does Student Debt Lead to Observed Financial Distress? High uncertainty in ex post return to a degree Cannot tell if borrowers are making optimal choices ex ante Particularly bad for non-completers Focus on expected return or better safety net? What is the correct counterfactual? Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, / 26
Understanding Changes in the Distribution
Is a Student Loan Cii Crisis on the Horizon? Understanding Changes in the Distribution of Student t Loan Debt over Time Beth Akers, Matthew Chingos, and Alice Henriques Brown Center on Education Policy
Discussion of Gicheva & Thompson, The Effects of Student Loans on Long- Term Household Financial Stability
Discussion of Gicheva & Thompson, The Effects of Student Loans on Long- Term Household Financial Stability Jesse Rothstein Upjohn/Spencer/Ford School Conference on Student Loans October 2013 Summary Regress
Issue Brief September 2004 Debt Burden: Repaying Student Debt
Issue Brief September 2004 Debt Burden: Repaying Student Debt Growth in borrowing and increasing student debt through the 1990s and into the new century have fueled the college affordability debate. Student
ECO671, Spring 2014, Sample Questions for First Exam
1. Using data from the Survey of Consumers Finances between 1983 and 2007 (the surveys are done every 3 years), I used OLS to examine the determinants of a household s credit card debt. Credit card debt
Enrollment Type. Proportion of Non AAS Students by Enrollment Type. UW Colleges Campus Profile: UW Fox Valley
Ten Year Enrollment Trends by Enrollment Type Fall AAS High School Special Audit Other Total Enrollment 2008 1473 62 88 5 13 1641 2009 1520 111 106 1 10 1748 2010 1583 118 97 9 24 1831 2011 1615 105 79
Is a Student Loan Crisis on the Horizon? Understanding Changes in the Distribution of Student Loan Debt over Time
Is a Student Loan Crisis on the Horizon? Understanding Changes in the Distribution of Student Loan Debt over Time Beth Akers, Matthew Chingos, and Alice Henriques Brown Center on Education Policy Brookings
Enrollment Type. UW Colleges Campus Profile: UW Marathon County. Proportion of Non AAS Students by Enrollment Type
Ten Year Enrollment Trends by Enrollment Type Fall AAS High School Special Audit Other Total Enrollment 2008 1250 12 62 11 28 1363 2009 1292 22 57 13 15 1399 2010 1315 25 41 14 14 1409 2011 1266 15 41
Enrollment Type. UW Colleges Campus Profile: UW Manitowoc. Proportion of Non AAS Students by Enrollment Type
Ten Year Enrollment Trends by Enrollment Type Fall AAS High School Special Audit Other Total Enrollment 2008 507 10 16 1 6 540 2009 489 14 31 5 9 548 2010 573 11 20 4 4 612 2011 624 10 20 4 6 664 2012
Loan Aversion in Education: What We Know and What Remains To Be Learned
Loan Aversion in Education: What We Know and What Remains To Be Learned BRENT EVANS PEABODY COLLEGE, VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CUNY 4/21/17 Introduction Student loans are an important component of financing
Online Appendix for: Minimum Wages and Consumer Credit: Lisa J. Dettling and Joanne W. Hsu
Online Appendix for: Minimum Wages and Consumer Credit: Impacts on Access to Credit and Traditional and High-Cost Borrowing Lisa J. Dettling and Joanne W. Hsu A1 Appendix Figure 1: Regional Representation
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 602894 Central Cities (CC) 227,818 Outside Central Cities 375,076 Percent of Entire MSA 37.79% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1187941 Central Cities (CC) 511,843 Outside Central Cities 676,098 Percent of Entire MSA 43.09% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 661645 Central Cities (CC) 247,057 Outside Central Cities 414,588 Percent of Entire MSA 37.34% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 583845 Central Cities (CC) 316,649 Outside Central Cities 267,196 Percent of Entire MSA 54.24% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1251509 Central Cities (CC) 540,423 Outside Central Cities 711,086 Percent of Entire MSA 43.18% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1135614 Central Cities (CC) 677,766 Outside Central Cities 457,848 Percent of Entire MSA 59.68% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 591932 Central Cities (CC) 260,970 Outside Central Cities 330,962 Percent of Entire MSA 44.09% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1100491 Central Cities (CC) 735,617 Outside Central Cities 364,874 Percent of Entire MSA 66.84% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 540258 Central Cities (CC) 198,915 Outside Central Cities 341,343 Percent of Entire MSA 36.82% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1249763 Central Cities (CC) 691,295 Outside Central Cities 558,468 Percent of Entire MSA 55.31% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1088514 Central Cities (CC) 272,953 Outside Central Cities 815,561 Percent of Entire MSA 25.08% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 922516 Central Cities (CC) 470,859 Outside Central Cities 451,657 Percent of Entire MSA 51.04% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 687249 Central Cities (CC) 198,500 Outside Central Cities 488,749 Percent of Entire MSA 28.88% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 542149 Central Cities (CC) 181870 Outside Central Cities 360279 Percent of Entire MSA 33.55% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1025598 Central Cities (CC) 293,834 Outside Central Cities 731,764 Percent of Entire MSA 28.65% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 875583 Central Cities (CC) 232,835 Outside Central Cities 642,748 Percent of Entire MSA 26.59% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 716998 Central Cities (CC) 448,275 Outside Central Cities 268,723 Percent of Entire MSA 62.52% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1333914 Central Cities (CC) 284,943 Outside Central Cities 1,048,971 Percent of Entire MSA 21.36% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 712738 Central Cities (CC) 448,607 Outside Central Cities 264,131 Percent of Entire MSA 62.94% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean. Population Entire MSA
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1169641 Central Cities (CC) 0 Outside Central Cities 1,169,641 Percent of Entire MSA 0% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999 to
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 3251876 Central Cities (CC) 2,078,750 Outside Central Cities 1,173,126 Percent of Entire MSA 63.92% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1592383 Central Cities (CC) 1,181,140 Outside Central Cities 411,243 Percent of Entire MSA 74.17% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1776062 Central Cities (CC) 716,793 Outside Central Cities 1,059,269 Percent of Entire MSA 40.36% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 4112198 Central Cities (CC) 416,474 Outside Central Cities 3,695,724 Percent of Entire MSA 10.13% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 9519338 Central Cities (CC) 4408996 Outside Central Cities 5110342 Percent of Entire MSA 46.32% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1623018 Central Cities (CC) 152397 Outside Central Cities 1470621 Percent of Entire MSA 9.39% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1731183 Central Cities (CC) 776733 Outside Central Cities 954450 Percent of Entire MSA 44.87% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2968806 Central Cities (CC) 669,769 Outside Central Cities 2,299,037 Percent of Entire MSA 22.56% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2846289 Central Cities (CC) 809063 Outside Central Cities 2037226 Percent of Entire MSA 28.43% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 4441551 Central Cities (CC) 1147720 Outside Central Cities 3293831 Percent of Entire MSA 25.84% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 1500741 Central Cities (CC) 661799 Outside Central Cities 838942 Percent of Entire MSA 44.1% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2552994 Central Cities (CC) 686992 Outside Central Cities 1866002 Percent of Entire MSA 26.91% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
The Impact of Credit Counseling on Consumer Outcomes: Evidence from a National Demonstration Program
The Impact of Credit Counseling on Consumer Outcomes: Evidence from a National Demonstration Program Stephen Roll Stephanie Moulton, PhD Credit Counseling Overview Reaches two million clients a year Provides
SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean
Family: Population Demographics Population Entire MSA 2414616 Central Cities (CC) 764431 Outside Central Cities 1650185 Percent of Entire MSA 31.66% Population in CC Percent Change in Population from 1999
The current study builds on previous research to estimate the regional gap in
Summary 1 The current study builds on previous research to estimate the regional gap in state funding assistance between municipalities in South NJ compared to similar municipalities in Central and North
Reemployment after Job Loss
4 Reemployment after Job Loss One important observation in chapter 3 was the lower reemployment likelihood for high import-competing displaced workers relative to other displaced manufacturing workers.
CSBG Scholarship/Trade Training. Please PRINT clearly
CSBG Scholarship/Trade Training Please PRINT clearly Today s Date: / / Your Name: Your Date of Birth / / Your Social Security Number - - Have you lived in McHenry County for all of the past 90 days? Yes
The State of Young Adult s Balance Sheets: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances
The State of Young Adult s Balance Sheets: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances Lisa J. Dettling Federal Reserve Board Joanne W. Hsu Federal Reserve Board May 2014 Abstract In this paper, we investigate
HOUSEHOLD DEBT AND CREDIT CONSTRAINTS: COMPARATIVE MICRO EVIDENCE FROM FOUR OECD COUNTRIES
HOUSEHOLD DEBT AND CREDIT CONSTRAINTS: COMPARATIVE MICRO EVIDENCE FROM FOUR OECD COUNTRIES Jonathan Crook (University of Edinburgh) and Stefan Hochguertel (VU University Amsterdam) Discussion by Ernesto
Do Households Increase Their Savings When the Kids Leave Home?
Do Households Increase Their Savings When the Kids Leave Home? Irena Dushi U.S. Social Security Administration Alicia H. Munnell Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher Anthony Webb Center for Retirement Research at
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur Millennial Financial Literacy and Fin-tech Use adipiscing elit, aliquam tincidunt dui.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur Millennial Financial Literacy and Fin-tech Use adipiscing elit, aliquam tincidunt dui. Annamaria Lusardi Brussels Month Year November 7, 2018 Lorem ipsum dolor sit
Figure 2.1 The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program
Figure 2.1 The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program Demographic Surveys Household Record Household-ID Data Integration Record Person-ID Employer-ID Data Economic Censuses and Surveys Census
Wealth Inequality Reading Summary by Danqing Yin, Oct 8, 2018
Summary of Keister & Moller 2000 This review summarized wealth inequality in the form of net worth. Authors examined empirical evidence of wealth accumulation and distribution, presented estimates of trends
How House Price Dynamics and Credit Constraints affect the Equity Extraction of Senior Homeowners
How House Price Dynamics and Credit Constraints affect the Equity Extraction of Senior Homeowners Stephanie Moulton, John Glenn College of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University Donald Haurin, Department
Demographic and Economic Characteristics of Children in Families Receiving Social Security
Each month, over 3 million children receive benefits from Social Security, accounting for one of every seven Social Security beneficiaries. This article examines the demographic characteristics and economic
Demographic Trends and the Older Workforce
Demographic Trends and the Older Workforce November 10, 2004 Linda Barrington, Ph.D. The Conference Board www.conference-board.org THE CONFERENCE BOARD Finding solutions together Councils Conferences Symposium
Policy Brief. protection?} Do the insured have adequate. The Impact of Health Reform on Underinsurance in Massachusetts:
protection?} The Impact of Health Reform on Underinsurance in Massachusetts: Do the insured have adequate Reform Policy Brief Massachusetts Health Reform Survey Policy Brief {PREPARED BY} Sharon K. Long
Jamie Wagner Ph.D. Student University of Nebraska Lincoln
An Empirical Analysis Linking a Person s Financial Risk Tolerance and Financial Literacy to Financial Behaviors Jamie Wagner Ph.D. Student University of Nebraska Lincoln Abstract Financial risk aversion
Demographics, Wealth and Opportunity
NCSL Family Opportunity Forum Demographics, Wealth and Opportunity June 14, 2016 William R. Emmons Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis William.R.Emmons@stls.frb.org These comments do not necessarily represent
$1,000 1 ( ) $2,500 2,500 $2,000 (1 ) (1 + r) 2,000
Answers To Chapter 9 Review Questions 1. Answer d. Other benefits include a more stable employment situation, more interesting and challenging work, and access to occupations with more prestige and more
KENTUCKY BOARD of EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
KENTUCKY BOARD of EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES Kentucky EMS 216 Attrition Survey 118 James Court, Suite 5 Lexington, KY 455 Phone (859) 256-3565 Fax (859) 256-3128 kbems.kctcs.edu KBEMS 216 ATTRITION SURVEY
Town Profiles: Demographic, Economic, and Housing Statistics for De Smet City and Wall Town, SOuth Dakota
South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Census Data Center News Releases SDSU Census Data Center 12-7-2017 Town Profiles:
Ministry of Advanced Education Student Aid Fund. Annual Report for saskatchewan.ca
Annual Report for 2017-18 saskatchewan.ca Table of Contents Letters of Transmittal... 1 Introduction... 2 Program Overview... 3 Mandate Statement... 3 The Saskatchewan... 3 Student Financial Assistance
The Role of Exponential-Growth Bias and Present Bias in Retirment Saving Decisions
The Role of Exponential-Growth Bias and Present Bias in Retirment Saving Decisions Gopi Shah Goda Stanford University & NBER Matthew Levy London School of Economics Colleen Flaherty Manchester University
Unlocking the Risk-based Pricing Puzzle: Five Keys to Cutting Credit Card Costs
Consumer Interests Annual Volume 53, 2007 Unlocking the Risk-based Pricing Puzzle: Five Keys to Cutting Credit Card Costs The introduction of risk-based pricing has substantially changed the U.S. credit
Income Inequality and Household Labor: Online Appendicies
Income Inequality and Household Labor: Online Appendicies Daniel Schneider UC Berkeley Department of Sociology Orestes P. Hastings Colorado State University Department of Sociology Daniel Schneider (Corresponding
Changes in Economic Mobility
December 11 Changes in Economic Mobility Lin Xia SM 222 Prof. Shulamit Kahn Xia 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Over years, income inequality has been one of the most continuously controversial topics. Most recent
Labor Economics Field Exam Spring 2014
Labor Economics Field Exam Spring 2014 Instructions You have 4 hours to complete this exam. This is a closed book examination. No written materials are allowed. You can use a calculator. THE EXAM IS COMPOSED
Name: 1. Use the data from the following table to answer the questions that follow: (10 points)
Economics 345 Mid-Term Exam October 8, 2003 Name: Directions: You have the full period (7:20-10:00) to do this exam, though I suspect it won t take that long for most students. You may consult any materials,
Saving for Retirement: Household Bargaining and Household Net Worth
Saving for Retirement: Household Bargaining and Household Net Worth Shelly J. Lundberg University of Washington and Jennifer Ward-Batts University of Michigan Prepared for presentation at the Second Annual
The social costs of dropouts in upper secondary education in Norway
The social costs of dropouts in upper secondary education in Norway Torberg Falch Anne Borge Johannesen Bjarne Strøm Related to SØF-project no 6700: "Kostnader ved frafall og forsinkelser i videregående
Snapshots of Financial Coaching. Bank of America & Annie E. Casey Foundation Meeting April 26, 2010
Snapshots of Financial Coaching Bank of America & Annie E. Casey Foundation Meeting April 26, 2010 Context for Coaching Financial Capacity Building Information Models Advice Models Mechanism Models Disclosures
Independence, MO Data Profile 2015
, MO Data Profile 2015 5 year American Community Survey (ACS) Jackson County, Missouri Data sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), 2011 2015 (released December 8, 2016), compared
Income and Assets of Medicare Beneficiaries,
Income and Assets of Medicare Beneficiaries, 2014 2030 Gretchen Jacobson, Christina Swoope, and Tricia Neuman, Kaiser Family Foundation Karen Smith, Urban Institute Many Medicare, including seniors and
COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION
COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION Technical Report: March 2011 By Sarah Riley HongYu Ru Mark Lindblad Roberto Quercia Center for Community Capital
CRIF Lending Solutions WHITE PAPER
CRIF Lending Solutions WHITE PAPER IDENTIFYING THE OPTIMAL DTI DEFINITION THROUGH ANALYTICS CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...3 1.1 THE TEAM... 3 1.2 OUR MISSION AND OUR APPROACH... 3 2 WHAT IS THE DTI?...4
ESTIMATING THE RISK PREMIUM OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. Brandon Payne East Carolina University Department of Economics Thesis Paper November 27, 2002
ESTIMATING THE RISK PREMIUM OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Brandon Payne East Carolina University Department of Economics Thesis Paper November 27, 2002 Abstract This paper is an empirical study to estimate
The Relationship Between Income and Health Insurance, p. 2 Retirement Annuity and Employment-Based Pension Income, p. 7
E B R I Notes E M P L O Y E E B E N E F I T R E S E A R C H I N S T I T U T E February 2005, Vol. 26, No. 2 The Relationship Between Income and Health Insurance, p. 2 Retirement Annuity and Employment-Based
Three Essays in Applied Microeconomics. Elizabeth J. Akers
Three Essays in Applied Microeconomics Elizabeth J. Akers Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA
Credit Crunched? The Relationship between Credit Denials and the Use of Alternative Financial Institutions
Consumer Interests Annual Volume 54, 2008 Credit Crunched? The Relationship between Credit Denials and the Use of Alternative Financial Institutions Because consumer credit markets may tighten as a result
LECTURE: MEDICAID HILARY HOYNES UC DAVIS EC230 OUTLINE OF LECTURE: 1. Overview of Medicaid. 2. Medicaid expansions
LECTURE: MEDICAID HILARY HOYNES UC DAVIS EC230 OUTLINE OF LECTURE: 1. Overview of Medicaid 2. Medicaid expansions 3. Economic outcomes with Medicaid expansions 4. Crowd-out: Cutler and Gruber QJE 1996
Perspectives on the Youth Labour Market in Canada
Perspectives on the Youth Labour Market in Canada Presentation to the Financial Management Institute of Canada November 16 René Morissette Research Manager Analytical Studies Branch While unemployment
By Derek V. Price Director of Higher Education Research Lumina Foundation for Education SYNOPSIS
November 2001 By Derek V. Price Director of Higher Education Research Lumina Foundation for Education SYNOPSIS Higher Education Research Highlights SUMMARY As the number and volume of student loans increase
DO YOUNG ADULTS WITH STUDENT DEBT SAVE LESS FOR RETIREMENT?
June 2018, Number 18-13 RETIREMENT RESEARCH DO YOUNG ADULTS WITH STUDENT DEBT SAVE LESS FOR RETIREMENT? By Matthew S. Rutledge, Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher, and Francis M. Vitagliano* Introduction The rapid
Economic Contribution of
Executive Summary The Economic Contribution of The Community College of Baltimore County State of Maryland Economic Growth Analysis Investment Analysis January 2013 Socioeconomic Impact Study STUDY HIGHLIGHTS
The Effect of Macroeconomic Conditions on Applications to Supplemental Security Income
Syracuse University SURFACE Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects Spring 5-1-2014 The Effect of Macroeconomic Conditions on Applications
Using Randomized Evaluations to Improve Policy
Daniel Stein (DIME) Using Randomized Evaluations to Improve Policy Development Impact Evaluation Initiative innovations & solutions in infrastructure, agriculture & environment naivasha, april 23-27, 2011
Survive and Thrive From Stress to Strength
P E N N S Y L V A N I A S S T A T E S Y S T E M O F H I G H E R E D U C A T I O N Survive and Thrive From Stress to Strength Pennsylvania Association of Councils of Trustees Peter H. Garland, Executive
2017 Regional Indicators Summary
2017 Regional Indicators Summary Regional Indicators Regional indicators are a specific set of data points that help gauge the relative health of the region in a number of areas. These include economy,
Predicting Student Loan Delinquency and Default. Presentation at Canadian Economics Association Annual Conference, Montreal June 1, 2013
Predicting Student Loan Delinquency and Default Presentation at Canadian Economics Association Annual Conference, Montreal June 1, 2013 Outline Introduction: Motivation and Research Questions Literature
Information Use and Attention Deferment in College Student Loan Decisions
Information Use and Attention Deferment in College Student Loan Decisions Rajeev Darolia University of Missouri New York Federal Reserve Bank April 27, 2017 1 Motivation Increasing focus on risk in higher
Tyler Area Economic Overview
Tyler Area Economic Overview Demographic Profile. 2 Unemployment Rate. 4 Wage Trends. 4 Cost of Living Index...... 5 Industry Clusters. 5 Occupation Snapshot. 6 Education Levels 7 Gross Domestic Product
The looming student loan default crisis is worse than we thought
January 10, 2018 The looming student loan default crisis is worse than we thought Judith Scott-Clayton Executive Summary This report analyzes new data on student debt and repayment, released by the U.S.
NAME DATE CLASS. Directions: Answer each of the following questions. Include in your answers the vocabulary words in parentheses.
Vocabulary Activity Content Vocabulary Directions: Answer each of the following questions. Include in your answers the vocabulary words in parentheses. 1. According to Karl Marx, why were the bourgeoisie
COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION
COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION Technical Report: February 2012 By Sarah Riley HongYu Ru Mark Lindblad Roberto Quercia Center for Community Capital
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Statistics and Information Department
Special Report on the Longitudinal Survey of Newborns in the 21st Century and the Longitudinal Survey of Adults in the 21st Century: Ten-Year Follow-up, 2001 2011 Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Trend Analysis of Changes to Population and Income in Philadelphia, using American Community Survey (ACS) Data
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT FINANCE AND BUDGET TEAM City Council of Philadelphia 9.22.17 Trend Analysis of Changes to Population and Income in Philadelphia, using 2010-2016 American Community Survey (ACS)
Investment, Human Capital and Growth
Investment, Human Capital and Growth Kevin Murphy, PhD 86 January 17, 2013 U.S. Real Per Capita GDP 1889-2012 10.75 10.25 Log of Real Per Capita GDP 9.75 9.25 8.75 8.25 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
Commission District 4 Census Data Aggregation
Commission District 4 Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page
LAKE FOREST NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE
LAKE FOREST NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE July 2017 Prepared in Partnership Between the Kentucky State Data Center at the University of Louisville and Metro United Way This data profile uses 2010 census tract boundaries