Financial Position Per Capita (County and Member Municipalities)

Transcription

1 COMMITTEE REPORT To: Chair and Members of the Administration, Finance and Human Resources Committee From: Ken DeHart, County Treasurer Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 Subject: BMA Municipal Study Financial Indicators Analysis Background: Each year, BMA Consulting Inc. completes a comparative study on behalf of participating Ontario municipalities. The analysis is completed using the most recent current value assessment, tax policies, levy by-laws, development charges, water/sewer rates, FIRS, user fees and economic development programs. This report is based on information contained in section 3 of the BMA study that focuses on key Financial Indicators related to Sustainability, Vulnerability and Flexibility. These indicators help evaluate each municipality s existing financial condition and identify future challenges and opportunities. SUSTAINABILITY - The ability to provide and maintain service and infrastructure levels without resorting to unplanned increases in rates or cuts to services. Indicator 1: Financial Position Per Capita Financial position is a key indicator of a municipality s financial health. It provides an indication of the affordability of future municipal spending. The net financial position is a broader measure of a municipality s indebtedness than debenture debt as it includes all of the municipality s financial assets and liabilities. A negative number indicates that a municipality s total liabilities exceed its total assets. $1,000 Financial Position Per Capita $800 $600 $400 $200 $- $(200)

2 $2,000 Financial Position Per Capita $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- $(500) $(1,000) $(1,500) $(2,000) Indicator 2: Net Financial Liabilities Ratio Net Financial Liabilities ratio is total liabilities minus assets as a percentage of own source revenues. It indicates the extent to which financial liabilities could be met by its operating revenue. A ratio greater than zero indicates that the municipality s total liabilities exceed the total assets Net Financial Liabilities Ratio

3 1.50 Net Financial Liabilities Ratio Indicator 3: Operating Surplus and Operating Surplus Ratio A key indicator of a municipality s financial performance is measured by the operating surplus ratio. An operating surplus (deficit) arises when operating revenue exceeds (is less than) operating expenses including amortization. When an operating surplus is achieved, the amount is available for capital expenditure over and above amortization expenses. Note that this is an annual (income statement) measure, rather than financial position, which is an accumulated measure over time. The operating surplus has been calculated on an accrual basis, excluding asset revaluations, developer contributions, capital grants and accounting corrections. It does not include donated assets, development charge collections and provincial and federal grants. This is each municipality s measure using 2014 FIR data. Long-term financial sustainability is dependent upon ensuring that on average, over time, expenses are less than revenues. In essence, this requires current taxpayers to fully meet the cost of services. Municipalities operating with a deficit over several years should ensure that the long-range financial plan provides clear direction to turn this around. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing s (MMAH) suggested target is to have an operating surplus ratio in the range of 0%-15%, with an advanced target of 15% or greater. Operating Surplus (Deficit) for Member Municipalities Municipality Tax Surplus Tax Own Source Revenue Tax Operating Surplus Wellington County $3,042,787 $100,605,456 3% Minto $91,887 $7,115,301 1% Wellington North ($216,746) $8,814,834-2% Centre Wellington ($1,908,853) $20,317,877-9% Erin ($832,470) $8,986,256-9% Guelph Eramosa ($799,043) $7,429,643-11% Puslinch ($819,292) $4,797,376-17% Mapleton ($1,226,479) $5,730,587-21%

4 The operating surplus ratio is the operating surplus (deficit) expressed as a percentage of Own Source Revenues. 5.0% Operating Surplus Ratio -5.0% % % Operating Surplus (Deficit) for Other Upper Tiers Municipality Tax Surplus Tax Own Source Revenue Tax Operating Surplus District of Muskoka $12,547,434 $90,730,827 14% Region Halton $59,793,467 $532,406,654 11% Region Durham $42,070,585 $673,335,323 6% Wellington County $3,042,787 $100,605,456 3% Region York ($20,599,486) $1,187,868,009-2% Region Niagara ($23,460,128) $459,696,458-5% Region Peel ($62,622,971) $1,046,251,780-6% Region Waterloo ($37,772,562) $544,308,981-7% 2 Operating Surplus Ratio 15.0% 1 5.0% -5.0% -1

5 Indicator 4: Asset Consumption Ratio This indicator provides an estimate of the useful life left in the municipality s capital assets. It shows the value of the tangible capital assets that have been consumed and seeks to highlight the aged condition of the assets and the potential asset replacement needs. The MMAH considers a ratio of 25% or under to be relatively new; 26%-50% to be moderately new; 51%-75% to be moderately old and over 75% to be old. 7 Total Asset Consumption Ratio % % % % 1 5.0% Total Asset Consumption Ratio

6 FLEXIBILITY The ability to issue debt responsibly without impacting the credit rating. Also, the ability to generate required revenues. Indicator 5: Reserves Reserves are a critical component of a municipality s long-term financial plan. Reserves offer liquidity which enhances the municipality s flexibility in addressing operating requirements and in permitting the municipality to temporarily fund capital projects internally, allowing it time to access debt markets and take advantage of favourable conditions. Three financial indicators have been included for tax reserves. In each case, the water and wastewater reserves and reserve funds have been excluded as well as obligatory reserve funds. I. Tax Discretionary Reserves as a % of Taxation - This provides the total tax discretionary reserves and reserve funds in relation to total taxation Tax Discretionary Reserves as a % of Taxation 25 Tax Discretionary Reserves as a % of Taxation

7 II. Tax Discretionary Reserves per Capita - This provides the total tax discretionary reserves in relation to the population. Tax Discretionary Reserves Per Capita $900 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $- $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $- Tax Discretionary Reserves Per Capita

8 III. Tax Discretionary Reserves as a % of Own Source Revenues - This shows the total value of funds held in reserves and reserve funds compared to a single year s own source revenue. It is a strong indicator of financial stability. Tax Discretionary Reserves as a % of Own Source Revenue 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Tax Discretionary Reserves as a % of Own Source Revenue 160% 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0%

9 Indicator 6: Debt There are five financial debt indicators that have been included in the analysis to provide a clear understanding of the overall debt outstanding and the debt servicing costs. I. Tax Debt Interest as % of Own Source Revenue - This ratio indicates the extent to which the municipality s own source revenues are committed to debt interest charges. 3.5% Tax Debt Interest as % of Own Source Revenue 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 2.5% Tax Debt Interest as % of Own Source Revenue 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5%

10 II. Debt Charges as a % of Own Source Revenues (Debt Service Ratio) - Debt Service is the amount of principal and interest that a municipality must pay each year to service the debt. As debt service increases it reduces expenditure flexibility. This shows the % of total debt expenditures, including interest as a % of own source revenue. It is a measure of the municipality s ability to service its debt payments. Credit rating agencies consider that principal and interest should be below 10% of own source revenue. Tax Debt Charges as % of Own Source Revenue % 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 1 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% Tax Debt Charges as % of Own Source Revenue 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0%

11 III. Debt Outstanding per Capita - This provides the debt outstanding divided by the population. Tax Debt Outstanding per Capita $450 $400 $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $- $1,000 $900 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $- Tax Debt Outstanding per Capita

12 IV. Debt Outstanding Per Own Source Revenue - This provides the debt outstanding divided by the municipality s own source revenues Debt Outstanding Per Own Source Revenue Debt Outstanding Per Own Source Revenue

13 V. Debt to Reserve Ratio - This measure reflects the amount of debt outstanding divided by a municipality s reserves and reserve funds. A measure above 1.0 indicates that a municipality has more long-term debt than reserves. Debt to Reserve Ratio Debt to Reserve Ratio

14 VULNERABILITY Addresses a municipality s vulnerability to external sources of funding that it cannot control and its exposure to risks. Indicator 7: Rates Coverage Ratio The Rates Coverage Ratio provides a measure of the municipality s ability to cover its costs through its own sources of revenue. It measures own source revenue as a % of total expenditures. According to the MMAH, a basic target is 40%-60%; an intermediate is 60%-90% and an advanced target is 90% or greater. 12 Rates Coverage Ratio Rates Coverage Ratio Recommendation: That the BMA Municipal Study Financial Indicators report be received for information. Respectfully submitted, Ken DeHart, CPA, CGA County Treasurer

15 Schedule A Summary of Indicators County and Member Municipalities Ranking 1 = Lowest Challenge 8 = Greatest Challenge Indicators 1 Financial Position Per Capita 2 Net Financial Liabilities Ratio 3 Operating Surplus and Operating Surplus Ratio 4 Asset Consumption Ratio 5 6 Tax Discretionary Reserves as a % of Taxation Tax Discretionary Reserves per Capita Tax Discretionary Reserves as a % of Own Source Revenues Tax Debt Interest as % of Own Source Revenue Debt Charges as a % of Own Source Revenues Debt Outstanding per Capita Debt Outstanding Per Own Source Revenue Debt to Reserve Ratio 7 Rates Coverage Ratio Centre Wellington Erin Guelph Eramosa Mapleton Minto Puslinch Wellington North Wellington County $580 $79 -$50 $383 $196 $395 $950 $ % -9.0% -11.0% -21.0% 1.0% -17.0% -2.0% 3.0% % 42.9% 34.4% 62.8% 44.7% 63.2% 51.0% 39.1% % 48.0% 44.0% 55.0% 58.0% 82.0% 137.0% $393 $232 $189 $244 $302 $384 $769 $ % 36.0% 33.0% 44.0% 36.0% 59.0% 104.0% 65.0% % 1.1% 2.4% 1.4% 0.5% 3.1% 1.6% % 5.6% 7.1% 7.5% 18.1% 2.6% 11.8% 4.2% $218 $206 $329 $53 $228 $61 $397 $ % 28.5% 56.4% 40.1% 57.4% 9.4% 60.9% 34.3% % 82.0% 82.9% 69.3% 92.2% 78.0% 97.7% 45.7%

16 Schedule B Summary of Indicators County and Upper-Tier Comparators Ranking 1 = Lowest Challenge 8 = Greatest Challenge Indicators 1 Financial Position Per Capita 2 Net Financial Liabilities Ratio 3 Operating Surplus and Operating Surplus Ratio 4 Asset Consumption Ratio 5 6 Tax Discretionary Reserves as a % of Taxation Tax Discretionary Reserves per Capita Tax Discretionary Reserves as a % of Own Source Revenues Tax Debt Interest as % of Own Source Revenue Debt Charges as a % of Own Source Revenues Debt Outstanding per Capita Debt Outstanding Per Own Source Revenue Debt to Reserve Ratio 7 Rates Coverage Ratio District of Muskoka Region Durham Region Halton Region Niagara Region Peel Region Waterloo Region York Wellington County -$204 $1203 $1600 -$65 -$69 -$987 -$1362 $ % 6.0% 11.0% -5.0% -6.0% -7.0% -2.0% 3.0% % 32.0% 26.4% 42.7% 25.5% 39.0% 32.2% 39.1% % 122.0% 172.0% 43.0% % 191.0% $986 $1101 $1143 $315 $766 $404 $1513 $ % 105.0% 132.0% % 39.0% 147.0% 65.0% % 1.0% 0.6% 1.6% 1.4% 2.3% 1.9% 1.6% % 2.1% 1.0% 7.9% 1.2% 7.1% 1.5% 4.2% $238 $285 $124 $432 $238 $888 $484 $ % 26.2% 50.4% 47.6% 106.2% 92.8% 214.1% 34.3% % 53.0% 51.2% 39.3% 45.4% % 45.7%