EE 577: Wireless and Personal Communications

Similar documents
Wireless Communications

EELE 5414 Wireless Communications. Chapter 4: Mobile Radio Propagation: Large-Scale Path Loss

EELE 6333: Wireless Commuications

Unit 1: The wireless channel

PROPAGATION PATH LOSS IN URBAN AND SUBURBAN AREA

Review of Comparative Analysis of Empirical Propagation model for WiMAX

Lecture 2: Wireless Propagation Channels

Proposed Propagation Model for Dehradun Region

EENG473 Mobile Communications Module 3 : Week # (11) Mobile Radio Propagation: Large-Scale Path Loss

EE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications. Week 7. Path Loss Models. Shadowing

Indoor Propagation Models

Suburban Area Path loss Propagation Prediction and Optimisation Using Hata Model at 2375MHz

Table of Contents. Kocaeli University Computer Engineering Department 2011 Spring Mustafa KIYAR Optimization Theory

Pathloss and Link Budget From Physical Propagation to Multi-Path Fading Statistical Characterization of Channels. P r = P t Gr G t L P

EE Large Scale Path Loss Log Normal Shadowing. The Flat Fading Channel

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PATH LOSS PREDICTION MODELS FOR URBAN MACROCELLULAR ENVIRONMENTS

Radio Propagation Modelling

A Measurement-Based Model For The Analysis Of Pathloss In A Given Geographical Area

Indoor Measurement And Propagation Prediction Of WLAN At

Radio Path Loss and Penetration Loss. Measurements in and around Homes. and Trees at 5.85 GHz. Mobile and Portable Radio Research Group

Path Loss Models and Link Budget

Optimizing the Existing Indoor Propagation Prediction Models

Empirical Path Loss Models for n Wireless networks at 2.4Ghz in rural regions

ECE 5325/6325: Wireless Communication Systems Lecture Notes, Spring 2013

Link Budget Calculation. Ermanno Pietrosemoli Marco Zennaro

Performance of Path Loss Model in 4G Wimax Wireless Communication System in 2390 MHz

Seasonal Pathloss Modeling at 900MHz for OMAN

Path Loss Prediction in Wireless Communication System using Fuzzy Logic

ECE 5325/6325: Wireless Communication Systems Lecture Notes, Fall Link Budgeting. Lecture 7. Today: (1) Link Budgeting

AN021: RF MODULES RANGE CALCULATIONS AND TEST

White Paper: Comparison of Narrowband and Ultra Wideband Channels. January 2008

The Wireless Communication Channel. Objectives

COMPARISON OF RADIO PROPAGATION CHARACTERISTICS AT 700 AND 2,500 MHz PERTAINING TO MACROCELLULAR COVERAGE

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (IJECET)

2015 American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER)

Path Loss Modeling Based on Field Measurements Using Deployed 3.5 GHz WiMAX Network

An Investigation on the Use of ITU-R P in IEEE N Path Loss Modelling

Investigating the Best Radio Propagation Model for 4G - WiMAX Networks Deployment in 2530MHz Band in Sub- Saharan Africa

Path Loss Model Using Geographic Information System (GIS)

IJESRT. Scientific Journal Impact Factor: (ISRA), Impact Factor: 2.114

PATH LOSS PREDICTION FOR LOW-RISE BUILDINGS WITH IMAGE CLASSIFICATION ON 2-D AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS

Comparison Between Measured and Predicted Path Loss for Mobile Communication in Malaysia

Performance Evaluation of Channel Propagation Models and Developed Model for Mobile Communication

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF INDOOR WLAN MOBILITY

Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems ISSN (Paper) ISSN (Online) Vol.4, No.9, 2013

Comparative Analysis of Path Loss Propagation Models in Radio Communication

Path Loss Measurements for a Non-Line-of-Sight Mobile-to-Mobile Environment

ISSN: [Chinedu, Nkwachukwu, Cosmas* et al., 6(5): May, 2017] Impact Factor: 4.116

Optimization of Empirical Pathloss Models of WiMax at 4.5 GHz Frequency Band

ECE6604 PERSONAL & MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS. Lecture 3. Interference and Shadow Margins, Handoff Gain, Coverage

I. INTRODUCTION II. COVERAGE AREA

Computer Simulation of Path Loss Characterization of a Wireless Propagation Model in Kwara State, Nigeria

Adjustment of Lee Path Loss Model for Suburban Area in Kuala Lumpur-Malaysia

Optimization of Base Station Location in 3G Networks using Mads and Fuzzy C-means

LTE RF Planning Training LTE RF Planning, Design, Optimization Training

Empirical Characterization of Propagation Path Loss and Performance Evaluation for Co-Site Urban Environment

Optimization of Path Loss Models Based on Signal Level Measurements in 4G LTE Network in Sofia

Coverage Planning for LTE system Case Study

PATH LOSS PREDICTION FOR GSM MOBILE NETWORKS FOR URBAN REGION OF ABA, SOUTH-EAST NIGERIA

arxiv: v2 [cs.it] 22 Feb 2016

Hata-Okumura Model Computer Analysis for Path Loss Determination at 900MHz for Maiduguri, Nigeria

Near Ground Path Loss Prediction for UMTS 2100 MHz Frequency Band Over Propagating Over a Smooth-Earth Terrain

CSP Algorithm In Predicting And Optimizing The Path Loss Of Wireless Empirical Propagation Models

[Ekeocha*, 5(5): May, 2016] ISSN: Impact Factor: 3.785

Er. Neha Sharma and Dr. G.C.Lall HCTM, Kaithal(affiliated to KUK, Haryana, India)

ANALYSIS OF A DEVELOPED BUILDING PENETRATION PATH LOSS MODEL FOR GSM WIRELESS ACCESS

900 MHz PATH LOSS MEASUREMENTS AND PREDICTION TECHNIQUES FOR IN-BUILDING COMMUNICATION SYSTEM DESIGN. Scott Y. Seidel and Theodore S.

Statistical Tuning of Hata Model for 3G Communication Networks at GHz in Porth Harcourt, Nigeria

Probability distributions relevant to radiowave propagation modelling

Volume 4, Number 2, 2018 Pages Jordan Journal of Electrical Engineering ISSN (Print): , ISSN (Online):

IJEETC. InternationalJournalof. ElectricalandElectronicEngineering& Telecommunications.

Statistical Analysis of On-body Radio Propagation Channel for Body-centric Wireless Communications

Dokumentnamn. Document - Ref PTS-ER-2004:32

Tuning and Cross Validation of Blomquist-Ladell Model for Pathloss Prediction in the GSM 900 Mhz Frequency Band

On Predicting Large Scale Fading Characteristics with the MR-FDPF Method

Development of Propagation Path Loss Prediction Model for Mobile Communications Network Deployment in Osogbo, Nigeria

Realistic Indoor Path Loss Modeling for Regular WiFi Operations in India

Measurement of Radio Propagation Path Loss over the Sea for Wireless Multimedia

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Performance Evaluation of Hata-Davidson Pathloss Model Tuning Approaches for a Suburban Area

Attenuation over distance and excess path loss for a large-area indoor commercial topology at 2.4 GHz

EE6604 Personal & Mobile Communications. Week 9. Co-Channel Interference

A Novel Hybrid Approach For Path Loss Exponent Estimation In Vanet Application

ITRAINONLINE MMTK RADIO LINK CALCULATION HANDOUT

Experimental Analysis of Cellular Outdoor Propagation at 1800 MHz over Dense Urban Regions of Ghaziabad

Path Loss at the Exact Location of TV inside Residences using Digital Terrestrial Television Signal at 677 MHz

Edinburgh Research Explorer

A Computationally Inexpensive Radio Propagation Model for Vehicular Communication on Flyovers and Inside Underpasses

Millimeter Wave Wireless Communications: New Results for Rural Connectivity

37th Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Sept. 2009

The Impact of Fading on the Outage Probability in Cognitive Radio Networks

Implementation of Path Loss Model in Wireless Network Anupa Saini 1 MsVarsha Chauhan 2

A Path Loss Calculation Scheme for Highway ETC Charging Signal Propagation

CHARACTERIZATION OF PROPAGATION PATH LOSS AT VHF/UHF BANDS FOR ILORIN CITY, NIGERIA

INFLUENCES OF PARTS OF TREE ON PROPAGATION PATH LOSSES FOR WSN DEPLOYMENT IN GREENHOUSE ENVIRONMENTS

Efficient and Consistent Path loss Model for Mobile Network Simulation

Research Article Improved Path Loss Simulation Incorporating Three-Dimensional Terrain Model Using Parallel Coprocessors

Design and Modeling of Propagation Models for WiMAX Communication System at 3.7GHz & 4.2GHz

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EMPIRICAL PATH LOSS MODELS OF UHF BAND, CASE STUDY OF OSOGBO TELEVISION STATION, ILE IFE, SOUTH-WEST NIGERIA

Assessment and Modeling of GSM Signal Propagation in Uyo, Nigeria

Transcription:

EE 577: Wireless and Personal Communications Large-Scale Signal Propagation Models 1 Propagation Models Basic Model is to determine the major path loss effects This can be refined to take into account the effects due to outdoor structures (buildings, trees, etc.) This can be refined for indoor use as well to take into account building wall composition, windows, etc. 2 1

Path Loss Model We use the basic average path loss as being a function of distance and environment <PL(dB)> = <PL(d 0 )> + 10 n log(d/d 0 ) The coefficient n is: 2 for straight path loss (free space) Higher for other environments 3 Path Loss Model Free space n = 2 Urban area cellular radio (CR) n = 2.7-3.5 Shadowed urban area CR n = 3 5 In buildings: line-of-site n = 1.6 1.8 Within buildings n = 4-6 The exact value needs to be empirically determined for the application 4 2

Shadowing Buildings, trees, etc. will all shadow the signal from the transmitter to the receiver This is usually modeled by a log-normal probability distribution These parameters for the fit are usually locality-dependent 5 Log-Normal Shadowing The received power is then given by the following P r (d) = P t (d) - <PL(d)> + X σ Here, X σ is a random variable describing the amount of shadowing in the area. This is usually a log-normal random variable (db value is normally distributed). This is best done by averaging over many paths in the area 6 3

Log-Normal Shadowing Note that the Gaussian statistics underlie everything Compute the probability that the received signal exceeds a given value γ by Pr[P r (d) > γ] = Q[(γ -<P r (d)>)/σ] where σ is the standard deviation observed in the transmission path 7 Coverage Area This is also required to analyze the cell radius for proper power at the cell boundary Since the signal is random, we cannot tell for sure if the coverage will be acceptable (enough quality) We can only rate the coverage on a statistical basis Coverage area: the percentage of area with a signal level exceeding a threshold, γ It is the useful coverage area 8 4

Coverage Area 9 Outage Probability It is the percentage of time the signal power falls below a minimum usable level It depends on the distribution of the signal power level It is the CDF of the signal distribution P o = Pr(γ < b) As the threshold b decreases, the outage probability decreases => better performance 10 5

Rayleigh: b = 10 db 11 Rayleigh: b = 20 db 12 6

With 2-branch Selection Diversity: b = 10 db 13 With 3-branch Selection Diversity: b = 10 db 14 7

With 4-branch Selection Diversity: b = 10 db 15 Reflection - Diffraction - Scattering Reflection occurs when a wave impinges upon a smooth surface of large size relative to λ (wavelength) Diffraction occurs when the path is blocked by an object with large dimensions relative to λ and sharp irregularities (edges) Scattering occurs when a wave impinges upon an object with dimensions on the order of λ or less 16 8

Two-Ray Ground Reflection Excess path: = 2h t h r /d It is the extra distance the reflected wave travels (compared to LOS) Phase difference: φ = 2π /λ Time delay of reflected path: t d = φ/2πf 17 Fresnel Zones An electromagnetic wavefront is divided into: Primary wave traveling through the LOS Secondary waves traveling distances larger than that of the LOS by nλ/2 Secondary waves define zones of concentric circles called Fresnel Zones The first Fresnel zone defines a propagation breakpoint, d 0 If first Fresnel zone is captured, the propagation is approximately free space 18 9

Diffraction Loss Excess path (between LOS and a diffracted path): 2 h d + d = 2 dd 1 2 1 2 Phase difference: 2π π 2 φ = = λ 2 v Diffraction Parameter: v= h 2( d1+ d2) λd d 1 2 19 Diffraction Loss Received energy depends on received Fresnel zones. From excess path, find the received Fresnel Zones: = nλ/2 Find n => the n th Fresnel Zones was not received The radii of Fresnel Zones around the diffraction: r n = nλd d d + d 1 2 1 2 20 10

Diffraction Loss Diffraction Loss: G d (db) = 20 log F(v) where F(v) is the Fresnel Integral 21 Diffraction Loss Example 4.7: [Rappaport]: d 1 = 1 km, d 2 = 1 km, λ = 1/3 m Compute diffraction loss for: a) h = 25 m b) h = 0 m c) h = -25 m Solution: a) v = 2.74 => G d = 21.7 db b) v = 0 => G d = 6 db c) v = -2.74 => G d = 0 db = 0.625 = nλ/2 => n = 3.75 => The first 3 Fresnel zones are lost at the receiver => First zone captured is the 4 th one 22 11

Propagation Modeling Theoretically, propagation can be predicted using Fresnel zones Rule-of-thumb: Keep at least 55% of 1 st Fresnel zone clear Fresnel zones are not useful for predicting indoor and microcell coverage The distance between the transmitter and receiver is often less than the breakpoint (at which zones are formed) Fresnel zones are not practical for distances beyond the breakpoint (short distances) 23 Statistical Propagation Models Based on statistical analysis of large amounts of measured data Predict signal strength as a function of distance and various parameters Useful for early network dimensioning, number of cells, etc... Blind to specific physics of any particular path - based on statistics only 24 12

Statistical Propagation Models Easy to implement Very low confidence level if applied to spot predictions Very good confidence level for system- wide generalizations; i.e., budgeting and initial system design and planning Examples: Log-distance model Log-normal shadowing model 25 Outdoor Propagation Models Complex empirical models have been developed to characterize an environment with variable antenna heights, terrain, multipath, etc. These models predict the propagation loss: Longley-Rice Model Durkin s Model Okumura s Model Hata s Model PCS Extension to Hata s Model (COST-231) 26 13

Longley-Rice Model An Outdoor Propagation Model Frequency Region: 40 MHz - 100 GHz Two-way reflection and knife-edge diffraction are used Features: accounts for free space propagation, scattering and terrain effects; some urban corrections Limitations: does not include good urban effects or blocking by buildings and foliage; no multipath effects 27 Durkin Model Computes signal levels at contours around Tx Uses 2-D arrays to provide a digital map Determines the path => uses diffraction techniques to find path loss Features: models multiple diffraction edges; imports standard terrain data; determines LOS or degree of obstruction Limitations: good to a few dbs in predictions (where valid); does not include good urban effects or blocking by buildings and foliage; no multipath effects 28 14

Okumura Model Frequency Region: 150 to 1920 MHz Can be extrapolated to 3000 MHz Models environments based totally on empirical measurements Used as a standard in Japan Features: Analytical performance curves can be obtained, many correction factors Limitations: Slow response to terrain changes, correct up to 10 db 29 Okumura Equations Median propagation loss estimate: L ( db) = L + A ( f, d) G( h ) G( h ) G p F mu d: Tx-Rx distance in km L F = 20 log( λ / 4πd), free space loss A mu (f,d): median attenuation (from graph) G AREA : city/rural correction factor (from graph) te re AREA 30 15

Okumura Equations h te : effective transmitter height (30-200 m) h re : effective receiver height (1 m to 10 m) G(h te ): gain factor from Tx antenna G(h re ): gain factor from Rx antenna G(h te ) = 20 log(h te /200), G(h re ) = 10 log(h re /3), G(h re ) = 20 log(h re /3), 1 km < h te < 10 m h re < 3 m 3 m < h te < 10 m 31 32 16

33 Example 4.10 [Rappaport] d = 50 km, h te = 100 m, h re = 10 m EIRP = 1 kw = 60 dbm, f = 900 MHz Find Rx power? Solutions: L F = 125.5 db, A mu (f,d) = 43 db, G(h te ) = -6 db, G(h re ) = 10.46 db, G AREA = 9 db, L p = 125.5+43-(-6)-10.43-9 = 155.04 db Rx power = EIRP(dB) 155.04 = -125.04 db 34 17

Hata Model Frequency Region: 150 to 1500 MHz It is an empirical formulation to Okumura s model Features: based on urban areas and applies corrections for other effects Limitations: d > 1 km 35 Hata Equations Median path loss in db in urban areas: L (urban) = 69. 55 + 26. 16log( f ) 13. 82log( h ) p ah ( ) + (449. 655log(. h))log( d) re Small-to-medium city correction (db): a(h re ) = (1.1 log(f) - 0.7) h re - (1.56 log(f) -0.8) te te 36 18

Hata Equations Large city correction: a(h re ) = 8.29 (log1.54h re ) 2-1.1 db, f < 300 MHz a(h re ) = 3.2 (log11.75h re ) 2-4.97 db, f > 300 MHz 37 Hata Equations Suburban: L p (db) = L p (urban) 2 [log(f C /28)] 2-5.4 Open, rural: L p (db) = L p (urban) - 4.78 [log(f)] 2-18.33 log(f) - 40.98 38 19

L p a( h re COST-231 Hata Model ( urban) = 46.3+ 33.9 log( f ) + (44.9 6.55log( h Extended to range: 1500 to 2000 MHz h te : 30 m to 200 m h re : 1 m to 10 m d: 1 km to 20 km C M = 0 db for medium cities and suburbs; = 3 db for metropolitan centers te C ) 13.82 log( h ))log( d) + C M te ) 39 How to Use The Propagation Loss? A link budget tells us the maximum allowable path loss on each link, and which link is the limiting factor This maximum allowable path loss will set our maximum cell size Input the maximum allowable loss (from the link budget) in the propagation equations Calculate the cell radius, R 40 20

Typical Parameters Tx Power ( ~ 30-45 dbm) Antenna Gain (~ 18 dbd for BS) Diversity Gain (~ 3-5 db) Rx Sensitivity (~ -105 dbm) Duplexer Loss (~ 1 db) Filter Loss (~ 2-3 db) Combiner Loss (~ 3 db) Feeder Loss (~ 3 db) Vehicle Penetration (~ 6 db) Body Loss (~ 3 db) Fade Margin (~ 8-10 db) 41 Indoor Propagation Models Propagation is influenced by: bldg. layout, material type, etc Different from outdoor by: Distance is smaller Environments vary widely Reflections, diffraction and scattering dominate performance Log-Normal shadowing is also valid Measurements in same floor and within floors were taken => tabulated 42 21

Indoor Propagation Models Parameters: FAF: floor attenuation factor PAF: partition attenuation factor Propagation index in same floor Propagation index in multi-floor Observations: Higher floors have less path loss (LOS) Lower floors have higher path loss (no LOS) Penetration loss increases with frequency Lower floors are more urban environments 43 Indoor Propagation Models Different from outdoor in two aspects: Much smaller distances Greater variability in environment. Reflections, diffraction and scattering dominate performance. Log-Normal shadowing is also valid 44 22

Log-distance Path Loss Model L d) = L( d ) + 10n log( d / d ) + X ( 0 0 σ ; (db) Shows up to 13 db standard deviation difference from measured data. 45 Attenuation Factor Model Attenuation very much affected by: Type of material Floor difference between Tx and Rx. Measurements are made for partition losses in the same floor, and partition losses between floors. L d) = L( d ) + 10n log( d / d ) + FAF + PAF; (db) ( 0 SF 0 n SF = same floor exponent FAF = Floor Attenuation Factor PAF = Partition Attenuation Factor. The model is applied using primary ray tracing technique Shows 4 db standard deviation difference from measured data. 46 23

47 48 24

Other Forms of Attenuation Factor Model We have seen before L d) = L ( d ) + 10n log( d / d ) + FAF + PAF; ( 0 SF 0 (db) The middle two terms could be substituted by one term for multi-floor propagation L d) = L( d ) + 10n log( d / d ) + PAF; ( 0 MF 0 (db) 49 50 25

Example 3 Building type: Office Building 1 f =1300 MHz; d =30 m; 3 floors; Two concrete partitions 2 Solution 4πd 0 L( d0 = 1) = 10 log = 34.7 db λ 1 st estimation L( d) = L( d0) + 10nSF log( d / d0) + FAF + PAF L(30) = 34.7 + 10 3.27 log(30) + 24.4 + 2 13 = 133 db L2( d nd ) Estimation: = L( d0) + 10nMF log( d / d0) + PAF L(30) = 34.7 + 10 5.22 log(10) + 2 13 = 108 db 51 Signal Penetration into Buildings Higher floors have less path loss (LOS) Lower floors have higher path loss (no LOS) Penetration loss decreases with increasing frequency (Higher frequencies penetrate better). Measurements behind windows are 6 db stronger than behind walls (buildings with no windows). 52 26

Loss Pattern Through Floors Signal strength 2 db/floor floor 53 27