Strategic Science Investment Fund Programmes. Performance Framework

Similar documents
Key Performance Indicator Targets and Measurement

Page 1 healthalliance (FPSC) Limited Statement of Intent

Tranche Three Results June 2017

Migration Trends Key Indicators Report

Evaluation of the Uganda Social Assistance Grants For Empowerment (SAGE) Programme. What s going on?

Regulatory Impact Analysis: Cost Recovery Impact Statement - Overview of Required Information 1

Chair, Cabinet Environment, Energy and Climate Committee INTERIM CLIMATE CHANGE COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE AND APPOINTMENT

Electoral Commission

EFSA STRATEGY Management Board Meeting 3 December 2015

In Confidence. Office of the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs Chair, Cabinet Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee

5. I intend to bring a further paper to this committee in August 2016 to start the process to ratify the Paris Agreement.

Statement of Intent healthalliance (FPSC) Ltd. Incorporating the Statement of Performance Expectations

Fact Sheet: Investor Confidence Rating (ICR)

Resource Allocation, Management, and Planning Steering Committee #7

The Financial Reporting Checklists Every Firm should be Doing

How to use this dashboard

Vote Prime Minister and Cabinet

Foxtons Interim results presentation For the period ended 30 June 2018

Procurement Functional Leadership Quarterly Report, January to March 2014

Opinions on technical and scientific matters concerning mutual recognition: working procedure for the Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

B.29[17d] Medium-term planning in government departments: Four-year plans

Review of Registered Charites Compliance Rates with Annual Reporting Requirements 2016

Contract Certainty Subscription Market Progress Update for FSA

a. Options for managing any equity shares the Government takes in projects through the Fund

Outcome Agreement. Ministry of Health. [insert name of Provider] [number of years in full] Annual contract value (plus GST) if applicable

Business & Financial Services December 2017

Prepared in accordance with section 21(2) of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996

UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY. May 2, 2013 BUDGETING

APPROPRIATION MINISTER(S): Minister for Climate Change (M12), Minister for the Environment (M29)

Finance Report for DCEO Steering Group. Financial Year 2017/18, August Executive Summary

Financial & Business Highlights For the Year Ended June 30, 2017

Vote Prime Minister and Cabinet

London Borough of Barnet Pension Fund. Communication Strategy (2018)

Statement of Intent. Statement of Performance Expectations

Foxtons Interim results presentation For the period ended June 2017

MANAGING FOR RESULTS: An Implementation Plan for the City of Portland

Statement of Performance Expectations

XML Publisher Balance Sheet Vision Operations (USA) Feb-02

Integrated Planning, Monitoring and Reporting

2011 Budget Initial Stakeholder Call

Statement of Intent

Quarter One Report January - March 2018

Implementing the DSRIP Finance Function

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

Regional overview Gisborne

Spheria Australian Smaller Companies Fund

ICE Endex UK Gas update. June 2015, London

INTEGRATING ASSESSMENT, PLANNING & BUDGETING. Presentation to URPC August 26, 2016 Lisa Castellino, PhD Office of Institutional Effectiveness

NZX IPO MASTERCLASS The Wynyard Listing Story. 5 September 2014

Regulatory Charter. Consumer and Commercial Regulatory System. December 2017

Government Policy Statement on land transport 2018 release for public engagement

2016 Toi Tōtara Haemata Investment Programme Assessor Guidelines and Scales

Introduction from the editor

Executive Summary: Patent Fee Proposal

Regional overview Hawke's Bay

Discussion. Information

CLIMATE CHANGE III: WORK PROGRAMME, BUDGET AND INSTITUTION FOR CLIMATE CHANGE PROJECT

RELEASED BY SSC UNDER OUR COMMITMENT TO OPEN GOVERNMENT

Integrated Resource Planning Process University of Wisconsin-Parkside June 21, 2012

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, MARCH 21 AT 4 PM

COLLABORATION AGREEMENT FOR THE A BETTER START NATIONAL SCIENCE CHALLENGE E TIPU E REA

B.20 SPE (2018) Statement of Performance Expectations

Deloitte Shared Services, GBS & BPO Conference

Source: Statistics New Zealand International Travel and Migration March 2015 MBIE: International Visitor Survey December 2014

APPROPRIATION MINISTER(S): Minister for Climate Change Issues (M12), Minister for the Environment (M29)

Caucus Session Health Benefits Plan W & Next Phase in Transformation April 2018

Release of EU Allowances in Germany

Vote Prime Minister and Cabinet

MARITIME AFFAIRS & FISHERIES. EMFF Strategic Programming

Sacramento City College

Resource Allocation, Management, and Planning Presentation for Board of Regents

IOTA STRATEGY. In Partnership for Advancing Tax Administrations. 29 June 2017

EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY BUDGET PRIMER

Audit & Compliance Guidance

Survey response for New Zealand

THE WORLD BANK TERMS OF REFERENCE Impact of carbon pricing instruments on national economy and contribution to NDC

RBC MANAGED PAYOUT SOLUTIONS. Generating sustainable cash flow

Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada. Internal Audit Report. Audit of the Income Assistance Program. Prepared by:

Successfully navigating the journey to pooling

GUYANA FORESTRY COMMISSION

Preparing the Statement of Intent. Guidance and Requirements for Crown Entities. ew Zealand Treasury

Container Export Protocol

2016 Full Year Results. 3 March 2017

FRESHWATER MANAGEMENT

THE YEAR 2017 OF SSPF IN SHORT. Stichting Shell Pensioenfonds

Common stock prices 1. New York Stock Exchange indexes (Dec. 31,1965=50)2. Transportation. Utility 3. Finance

Second Science & Technology Project (P127308)

Finishing strong in the ASC 606 marathon: An in-depth look at licensing, modifications, and other potential hurdles

Quarterly Summary Report

Pilot Watersheds Plan Development: Work Plan

Quarterly Labour Market Report. December 2016

REVIEW OF STATUTORY AUTHORITIES FOR INFORMATION MATCHING

SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE

Regional overview Auckland

IFRS 4 Phase II Operational impacts

Board of Directors Chairman s Report CEO s Report Overview Management Team...7

UNICEF s Strategic Planning Processes

Project Connect. July 11, 2012

How Performance Management and Beyond Budgeting are Transforming DFW Airport

Managing tax administration reforms

Transcription:

Strategic Science Investment Fund Programmes Performance Framework 2018

Contents THE PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT 1 Who It Is Intended For 1 Strategic Science Investment Fund 1 SSIF Programmes 2 Key Elements of Performance Monitoring 2 Performance Areas 2 Key Performance Indicators 3 Actions 3 Crown Ownership and Purchase Interests for SSIF Programmes Hosts 4 PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND EVALUATION FOR SSIF PROGRAMMES 5 Key Timelines 5 Annual Monitoring Process 5 SSIF Programmes Project Monitoring and Evaluation Process Until 2024 6 SSIF Programmes Annual Monitoring Cycle 7 Annual Update Process 7 Annual Progress Report Process 7 Annual Monitoring Process MBIE Actions 9 SSIF PERFORMANCE REVIEWS 10 Mid-Term Review 10 End of Contracts Review 10 Ad hoc Reviews and Audits 10 Updates and Reviews of the SSIF Investment Plan 10 APPENDIX A: SSIF PROGRAMMES KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 11 The material contained in this document is subject to Crown copyright protection unless otherwise indicated. The Crown copyright protected material may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission. This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Where the material is being published or issued to others, the source and copyright status should be acknowledged. The permission to reproduce Crown copyright protected material does not extend to any material in this report that is identified as being the copyright of a third party. Authorisation to reproduce such material should be obtained from the copyright holders. Published: September 2018

The Purpose of this Document 1 The Strategic Science Investment Fund (SSIF) Programmes Performance Framework sets out how MBIE will monitor and evaluate: > SSIF Programmes contracts > the SSIF Programmes investment as a whole. The Framework is intended to deliver transparent, comparable information on the outcomes of investments across SSIF Programmes. The performance information is intended to inform future investment decisions. Who it is intended for The principal audiences for the Framework are MBIE staff and SSIF Programmes hosts. The Framework outlines the monitoring and evaluation tools that allow MBIE to understand: > how research organisations with SSIF Programmes contracts (SSIF Platform hosts) are progressing towards achieving the strategy set out for each SSIF platform, and responding to any changes in SSIF investment signals > how well SSIF Programmes investments overall align with the signals in the SSIF Investment Plan. The Framework provides SSIF Platform hosts with a high-level overview of how MBIE monitors and evaluates SSIF Programmes funding, and provides context for the reporting and review requirements specified in SSIF Programmes contracts with MBIE. MBIE will provide SSIF Platform hosts with more detailed guidelines on annual reporting and review, and those guidelines will be consistent with this Framework. Strategic Science Investment Fund The Strategic Science Investment Fund (SSIF) was established in April 2016 to support longerterm underpinning infrastructure and programmes of mission-led science critical to the future of New Zealand s economy, environment and wellbeing. There are two categories of SSIF investment: Programmes and Infrastructure. This framework covers only SSIF Programmes. SSIF investments are structured around Science Platforms. A Science Platform is: a combination of people, facilities, information and knowledge that provide a particular, ongoing science and innovation capability for New Zealand. The SSIF Investment Plan contains more detail on the purpose and principles underlying SSIF, investment signals for SSIF Programmes, and guidance on the Government s directions for current and future investments made through the SSIF 1. 1 http://www.mbie.govt.nz/info-services/science-innovation/investment-funding/how-we-invest/strategic-science-investment-fund/documentimage-library/ssif-investment-plan.pdf

2 SSIF Programmes SSIF Programmes funding is for Science Platforms to enable organisations to undertake longterm mission-led science. Under the SSIF, government and research organisations work together to ensure that these programmes deliver Government s priorities for science 2. SSIF Programmes currently covers the following investments: > Crown Research Institute (CRI) SSIF Programme funding (contracted from 1 July 2017, and funded at the same levels as the previous year s CRI Core Funding) > Independent Research Institute (IRO) SSIF Programme funding (contracted from 1 July 2018, and funded at the same levels as the previous year s IRO Capability Funding). > Antarctic Science Platform, announced in Budget 2017 (establishment contract currently underway, with the Platform expected to be fully operational by 31 October 2018). Other SSIF Programmes investments may be added in future. Each SSIF Programmes contract includes a strategic document that shows how the proposed research addresses the investment signals set out in the Investment Plan, and a set of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). KPIs form the basis of reporting for SSIF Programmes investments. The Performance Framework currently (as at August 2018) covers CRI, IRO and Antarctic SSIF Programmes funding. MBIE expects that the Framework will apply to future SSIF Programmes investments, although it may be adjusted in future if needed to ensure it is fit-for-purpose for all SSIF Programmes investments. SSIF Platform hosts, through their governance and management arrangements, are responsible for making detailed decisions on SSIF Programmes funding. MBIE s role is to monitor and evaluate the performance of the hosts against the Programmes Investment Contract and the SSIF Investment Plan. Key Elements of Performance Monitoring Performance Areas The SSIF Investment Plan sets out the following performance areas for SSIF Programmes investments: PERFORMANCE AREA CRITERIA 1 Strategic Intent SSIF is supporting national and end-user science priorities Platforms are evolving to advance strategic goals 2 Impact SSIF is delivering national benefit SSIF is developing new knowledge and opportunities 3 Science excellence Host has robust internal processes to ensure excellence External recognition of science excellence 4 Horizons and co- SSIF investment is balanced across spheres of impact, horizons and types of investment 2 Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Strategic Science Investment Fund Investment Plan 2017 2024: 2017 Update

funding/leverage SSIF investment leverages an appropriate contribution from primary beneficiaries Appropriate arrangements are in place for contribution from users of research 3 5 Investing in people SSIF is supporting national capability Critical capabilities are dynamic and are continuing to evolve in priority areas 6 Vision Mātauranga SSIF investment is aligned to the Vision Mātauranga policy 7 Domestic and International Collaboration SSIF is leveraging national and international connections Key Performance Indicators > Each Platform host agrees with MBIE a set of indicators to measure the delivery against the performance areas in the SSIF Investment Plan. > For CRIs: some indicators are taken from the CRI s Statement of Corporate Intent some are specific to SSIF Programmes investment. > For IROs and the Antarctic Science Platform: indicators are specific to SSIF Programmes investment. > Indicators may be updated by agreement between MBIE and the SSIF Programmes host, to reflect changes as each investment progresses. > Principles applying to all SSIF Programmes KPIs are that they: must provide information in relation to the seven SSIF performance areas should be few in number (preferably no more than two per performance area), and balance the need for MBIE to account for public funds with minimising the reporting burden for hosts should, where hosts are Crown Entities, minimise duplication with existing reporting requirements from the Crown should relate to the aim of the particular SSIF investment (as set out in the Investment Plan, relevant Cabinet Decisions and other key documents) will aim to incorporate the interests of key government stakeholders. > Examples of indicators are in Appendix A: SSIF Programmes Key Performance Indicator examples. Actions > SSIF Programmes contracts include time-bound actions that are central to SSIF performance, under each performance area.

4 Crown Ownership and Purchase Interests for SSIF Programmes Hosts SSIF Programmes investments are distinct from the ownership arrangements of SSIF Programmes hosts. SSIF is designed as a mechanism for purchasing science that advances strategic goals (which also build strength and depth in key areas). Whilst contracts are with organisations, it is the science or Science Platforms, not the organisation that is being invested in. However, for CRIs MBIE has a dual relationship with SSIF Platform hosts. The Crown is the sole shareholder of CRIs, and MBIE is the primary monitoring agency for CRIs. Therefore SSIF performance monitoring must reflect both the Crown s ownership and purchase interests for CRIs: > The planning and reporting cycle for CRIs includes annual Statements of Corporate Intent, regular reporting to MBIE, and regular monitoring meetings between MBIE and CRIs. CRIs report on a set of KPIs at a corporate level. Each CRI is reviewed every four years against their Statement of Core Purpose. > SSIF is focused on purchasing science that advances strategic goals, and supports capability that builds science strength and depth. MBIE also purchases science from CRIs through other investment mechanisms such as the Endeavour and Partnership funds. > MBIE is responsible for ensuring ownership and purchasing functions for CRIs are coordinated. The host for the Antarctic Science Platform is Antarctica New Zealand, a Crown Entity administered by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT). MFAT and the Ministry for the Environment are key stakeholders for the Antarctic Science Platform. MBIE is currently (as at August 2018) developing KPIs for the Platform with Antarctica New Zealand and key stakeholders. The Crown has a science purchase interest in IROs, but does not have an ownership interest in them. If future SSIF Platform hosts are Crown Entities, then MBIE may coordinate performance monitoring for SSIF Platforms investments with the government agency responsible for the entity.

Performance Monitoring and Evaluation for SSIF Programmes 5 Key Timelines Annual Monitoring Process TYPE OF MONITORING MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEPT OCT NOV MBIE updates Annual Update/Annual Progress Report guidelines Annual Update process Hosts submit Annual Update 30 Apr MBIE/hosts hold Annual Update Strategic Meetings MBIE provides feedback to hosts on Annual Update IMS open for Annual Progress Report Hosts submit Annual Progress Report Annual Progress Report process 1 Aug 31 Aug MBIE provides feedback to hosts MBIE/hosts hold Annual Progress Report Strategic Meetings

6 SSIF Programmes Project Monitoring and Evaluation Process Until 2024 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 TYPE OF MONITORING JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR JUL OCT JAN APR Annual Update discussions Annual Progress Report discussions SSIF Programmes science excellence/impact 4-year review CRIs SSIF Programmes science excellence/impact 4-year review IROs and Antarctic Science Platform SSIF Investment Plan will be refreshed in 2021 MBIE may conduct an outcome evaluation for SSIF Programmes

SSIF Programmes Annual Monitoring Cycle There are two SSIF Programmes annual monitoring processes: > Annual Update process > Annual Progress Report process. 7 Annual Update Process > MBIE and the Platform host discuss plans for the next year of the SSIF Programmes contract. the host provides an Annual Update covering the research, science and technology or related activities that it proposes to undertake over the next 12 months, by the end of April MBIE and the host meet in May for a strategic discussion on the host s plans for the year MBIE provides, in June, feedback on the annual update and discussion. Annual Progress Report Process > The Platform host provides an Annual Progress Report by no later than 31 August covering the delivery of strategic science as part of a Science Platform over the previous year. > The report includes a narrative annual report, statistical information on projects, and data on each agreed KPI. > The report contains the following sections: Funding summary Public Summary Progress and Key Achievements Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Case Studies Project-Level Information (including statistical information) > Statistical information on projects funded will be gathered by spreadsheet initially. Eventually MBIE will be able to access information on projects funded through SSIF Programmes funding using the National Research Information System. > SSIF Programmes Reports are due as follows: CRIs: First report is due 31 August 2018 IROs: First report is due 31 August 2019. > This information will be entered through the MBIE portal. Project level information will be uploaded as an Excel spreadsheet. > MBIE will provide feedback to the host on the SSIF Programmes Annual Progress Report. MBIE and the Platform host will have a second strategic discussion to discuss feedback in October/November. MBIE may require the host to carry out an action plan that addresses any issues identified in the feedback and second strategic discussion. Substantive changes will be recorded as contract variations. The annual assessment process is summarised on the next page.

QSTRATEGIC SCIENCE INVESTMENT FUND PROGRAMMES PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK 8 SUMMARY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS Performance Areas 1. Strategic Intent 2. Impact 3. Science excellence 4. Horizons and co-funding/leverage 5. Investing in people 6. Vision Mātauranga 7. Domestic and International Collaboration Annual Update Overall SSIF Programmes funding (including any changes sought in funding between platforms) SSIF Programmes-funded research and activities for the upcoming year, across each of the performance areas Proposed new actions Proposed changes to KPIs MBIE assesses document Strategic discussion between MBIE and Platform host Annual Progress Report Summaries Progress and Key Achievements Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) - including narrative against each performance area Case Studies Project-Level Information MBIE assesses document Strategic discussion between MBIE and Platform host Letter from MBIE outlining: Record of discussion Potential areas for contract variation Other sources of information Letter from MBIE outlining: MBIE assessment of performance Action plan to address issues if required Contract variation if required

Annual Monitoring Process MBIE Actions MBIE has developed and issued guidelines for annual reporting in 2018, in consultation with SSIF Programmes hosts and representative organisations. 9 MBIE will: > open IMS for annual reporting, by 1 August 2018 > create guidelines for IRO SSIF Programmes Reporting for all SSIF Programmes Platforms hosts by March 2019. From 2019, MBIE will update SSIF Programmes Reporting guidelines by March of each year if necessary, and open IMS or replacement systems for reporting by 1 July of each year.

SSTRATEGIC SCIENCE INVESTMENT FUND PROGRAMMES PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK 10 SSIF Performance Reviews Mid-Term Review > SSIF Programmes contracts for CRIs will be reviewed in the second half of 2021 (after 4 years of the 7 year term of the SSIF Programmes contracts). IROs and the Antarctic Science Platform will be reviewed in 2021/22. > The reviews may result in MBIE and a SSIF Programmes host agreeing changes to the SSIF Programmes contract. End of Contracts Review > The majority of SSIF Programmes contracts will expire in 2024. MBIE may review contracts and/or evaluate the SSIF Programmes funding mechanism prior to this to inform policy decisions about the future of the Fund. Ad Hoc Reviews and Audits > Besides the scheduled reviews outlined above, MBIE may choose to carry out ad hoc reviews of Platform hosts in respect of SSIF Platform Plans. MBIE may also commission an audit of records relevant to SSIF Platform Plans when MBIE considers it necessary. Updates and Reviews of the SSIF Investment Plan > The SSIF Investment Plan will be updated annually to include new Government investments in SSIF. > The Investment Plan will be reviewed fully in 2021, prior to the mid-term review of CRI SSIF Programmes contracts.

Appendix A: SSIF Programmes Key Performance Indicators 11 SSIF PERFORMANCE AREAS EXAMPLE OF KPI/MEASURE FROM (as outlined in SSIF Investment Plan) CRI SSIF CONTRACT EXAMPLE OF TARGET FROM CRI SSIF CONTRACT Strategic Intent SSIF is supporting national and end-user science priorities Platforms are evolving to advance strategic goals Impact SSIF is delivering national benefit SSIF is developing new knowledge and opportunities Science excellence Provider has robust internal processes to ensure excellence External recognition of science excellence Horizons and co-funding/leverage SSIF investment is balanced across spheres of impact, horizons and types of investment SSIF investment leverages an appropriate contribution from primary beneficiaries Appropriate arrangements are in place for contribution from users of research Stakeholder satisfaction with priority setting Demonstrated progress towards achieving impact Impact case studies Development of new IP (optional) New products, processes developed and transferred to endusers (optional) Satisfaction among stakeholders with knowledge exchange and technology development External review (including international input) of excellence of research as part of CRI s normal review processes Scientific publications calculated using mean citation score for journals in which CRI papers are published Shift in balance of investment portfolio towards Discovery Science Investment from third parties Balance of funding across horizons Level of stakeholder satisfaction (% of stakeholders surveyed) equal to or exceeding baseline set in 2017/18 X % of milestones or critical steps for each impact area on track, reported annually X impact case studies published annually to demonstrate contribution of SSIF to national benefit and/or new knowledge and opportunities Number of patents, trademarks and licenses/pvrs, NDAs as appropriate produced in reporting year Number developed and used in reporting year Level of stakeholder satisfaction (% of stakeholders surveyed) equaling or exceeding baseline set in 2017/18 Satisfactory feedback on excellence of SSIF research in X science reviews conducted annually Numeric target met or exceeded annually % of SSIF funding targeted to Discovery Science meets or exceeds target(s) set Commercial revenue of $x per FTE Targets (% and timeframe) for SSIF research across horizons: New Ideas: Emerging Ideas: Leveraging Proven Ideas

SSTRATEGIC SCIENCE INVESTMENT FUND PROGRAMMES PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK 12 SSIF PERFORMANCE AREAS EXAMPLE OF KPI/MEASURE FROM (as outlined in SSIF Investment Plan) CRI SSIF CONTRACT EXAMPLE OF TARGET FROM CRI SSIF CONTRACT Investing in people SSIF is supporting national capability Critical capabilities are dynamic and are continuing to evolve Vision Mātauranga SSIF investment is aligned to the Vision Mātauranga policy Capability supported by SSIF Engagement with Māori A capability/succession plan is in place that identifies how SSIF capability is supported. Refreshed annually Number and $ value of SSIF projects with Māori stakeholders embedded in research projects % Māori stakeholder satisfaction with engagement equal to or exceeding baseline set in 2017/18 Domestic and International Collaboration SSIF is leveraging national and Collaborative publications international connections % of publications with other NZ institutes equal to or exceeding baseline set in 2017/18 % of publications with international institutes equal to or exceeding baseline set in 2017/18