Certificate IV in Project Management Practice

Similar documents
M_o_R (2011) Foundation EN exam prep questions

Risk Management Plan for the <Project Name> Prepared by: Title: Address: Phone: Last revised:

APPENDIX 1. Transport for the North. Risk Management Strategy

SCOTTISH FUNDING COUNCIL CAPITAL PROJECTS DECISION POINT PROCESS

Kidsafe NSW Risk Management Plan. August 2014

Five-Day Schedule and Course Content

Risk Management Plan PURPOSE: SCOPE:

Achieve PMP Exam Success Five-Day Course Syllabus

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Index

Richard Larson, PMP, CBAP, PMI-PBA President and Founder Watermark Learning. Enhanced 1 Performance. Enduring bapmtraining

Fundamentals of Project Risk Management

TRAINING CATALOGUE ON IMPACT INSURANCE Building practitioner skills in providing valuable and viable insurance products

Introduction to Project Management. Modeling after NYS ITS

The University of Leeds Guidelines on Investment Decision Making: Building and Refurbishment Projects

Section Defining Risk Management. 11. Principles of Risk Management

Cabinet Committee on State Sector Reform and Expenditure Control STAGE 2 OF TRANSFORMING NEW ZEALAND S REVENUE SYSTEM

Template : Project Initiation Document (PID)

2) What is algorithm?

Project Management Professional (PMP) Exam Prep Course 11 - Project Risk Management

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR POLICY

Project Management in ICT. Prof. Dr. Harald Wehnes

Risk Management User Guide. Prepared By: Neville Turbit Version Feb /01/2009 Risk Management User Guide Page 1 of 36

Summary of Submitted 2015 Budget From Rates

Underwriting Guidelines Corporate Finance

Chapter 8: Lifecycle Planning

Risk Management Policy and Framework

Contents INTRODUCTION...4 THE STEPS IN MANAGING RISKS ESTABLISH GOALS AND CONTEXT IDENTIFY THE RISKS...8

Risk Management Relevance to PAS 55 (ISO 55000) Deciding on processes to implement risk management

1. A methodology provides a strategic-level plan for managing and controlling IT projects. a. True b. False True

PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT & LOGICAL FRAMEWORK MATRIX TRAINING CYPRIOT CIVIL SOCIETY IN ACTION V INNOVATION AND CHANGES IN EDUCATION VI

Business Plan

Integrated Risk Management Framework Sept Page 1 of 17

4.1 Risk Assessment and Treatment Assessing Security Risks

IATI Country Pilot Synthesis Report May June 2010

Asset management background. NAMS pilot projects. Lessons learned

Project Management CSC 310 Spring 2017 Howard Rosenthal

Risk Management Guidelines

BCE Guidance. Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant. Version 1.0

Public Trust in Insurance

Railway Housing Association. Value for Money Strategy

Headline Verdana Bold Managing tax Balancing current challenge with future promise The EYE, Amsterdam, 30 November - 1 December 2016

Construction projects: manage risk to achieve success

Objectives. What is Risk? But a Plan is not Reality. Positive Risks? What do we mean by Uncertainty?

Tactics to Grow in 2016

Risk Management Plan Project Name: Version 1.0 Date: dd/mm/yyyy

RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

Decommissioning Basis of Estimate Template

Creating the WOW Case Study of a Large Tenant Improvement Project What you are in for Project Management Overview Scope Development-What?

Mid-Year Review

Risk Approach to Prioritising Maintenance Risk Factors for Value Management

Creating value in Private Equity

PMI - Dallas Chapter. Sample Questions. March 22, 2002

Integrated Capital Planning Manual

GEOTHERMAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Risk Management Framework

Selection criteria for Call 5.3 An effective system of evaluation of targeted support programmes

PRINCE2. Number: PRINCE2 Passing Score: 800 Time Limit: 120 min File Version:

THE PMP EXAM PREP COURSE

PAPER F3 FINANCIAL STRATEGY. Acorn Chapters

FAQ: Estimating, Budgeting, and Controlling

Risk Management Framework

Type: Services. Related Personal Outcome Measure: I Feel Safe. Code: 1.8. Date Released: 29 / 05 / Date/s Released: 21 / 11 / 2003

Risk Management Made Easy. I. S. Parente 1

Strategic Meetings Management Case study

VODAFONE GROUP PLC TAX STRATEGY

Project Management CTC-ITC 310 Spring 2018 Howard Rosenthal

Project Theft Management,

Fundamentals Level Skills Module, Paper F5

REPUTATION RISK ON THE RISE

TAC 216 Companion Guide

Introduction. The Assessment consists of: A checklist of best, good and leading practices A rating system to rank your company s current practices.

ISSC OPERATING PROCEDURES

Recommendations which have been implemented have been removed from this report. The original numbering of recommendations has been retained.

A Guide to Buying Your Own Home

Overview of the Key Findings

Improve business results by first improving your vendor selection

UBS Australasia Conference

Managing through incentives

Procedure: Risk management

Policy No. Contact Brian Orpin Version 3.0 Issue Date 28/11/2014 Telephone Review Date IA Date 09/08/2013

Introduction to the Fund-Mapping Tool

Basic Introduction to Project Cycle. Management Using the. Logical Framework Approach

Vote Prime Minister and Cabinet

PMI - Dallas Chapter. PMP Exam Sample Questions

Vote Defence. APPROPRIATION MINISTER(S): Minister of Defence (M22) APPROPRIATION ADMINISTRATOR: Ministry of Defence

1. Define risk. Which are the various types of risk?

SWEN 256 Software Process & Project Management

Tax Department Trends. Tuesday, November 28, 2017 Wichita Country Club Doug Watson - Director Evan Malcom - Manager

RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

Bournemouth Primary MAT Risk Management Policy

RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY. Head of Corporate Development and Change. Policy owners

Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary Level and Advanced Level 9706 Accounting November 2013 Principal Examiner Report for Teachers

Pass PMP in 21 Days - ITTO Toolbox PROCESS MAP

IPO Readiness. IPO Milestones Timeline. CMA review and decision. IPO decision. Subscription period. IPO readiness. Submit IPO application

RISK MANAGEMENT STANDARDS FOR P5M

Workplace pensions - Frequently Asked Questions

All organisational units

UCISA TOOLKIT. Major Project Governance Assessment. version 1.0

The Features of Investment Decision-Making

Risk Management Policy

Transcription:

BSB41515 Certificate IV in Project Management Practice Day 1: Project Initiation Course structure 8-day program Attendance sheet Active participation Assessment portfolio Initiating projects Planning projects (2 days) Project leadership Project delivery & close https://open.institute.pm DAY 1.1

Initiating projects Project frameworks What is a project? Projects v business as usual Project methodologies Opportunity definition Project lifecycle The triple constraints Project concept canvas Alternatives analysis Alternatives identification Feasibility analysis Cost estimation The business case Quantifying outcomes Organisational risk Multi-criteria analysis OPEN Unit 1: Project frameworks Project frameworks What is a project? Projects v business as usual Project methodologies DAY 1.2

What is a project? OPEN 1.1 A temporary endeavour undertaken to create a unique product, service or result Operations Projects OPEN 1.2 DAY 1.3

OPEN 1.3 Projects Operations Temporary / unique Routine / cyclic DISRUPTIVE CHANGE Uncertain performance Significant planning Up-front finance Based on precedent Routine planning Self-financing ORGANIC CHANGE New & complex relationships Established relationships Projectised organisation OPEN 1.4 DAY 1.4

Activity 1.1 How well does your organisation manage projects? Discussion What are the benefits of a project methodology? DAY 1.5

Project methodology OPEN 1.8 Common language Policies and processes Assets (templates) Definitions Make quicker decisions Project methodology OPEN 1.8 Assures project delivery Enables reliable estimates Optimises resources Reduces risk Solve problems faster DAY 1.6

Project methodology OPEN 1.8 Facilitates change Changing personnel Changing requirements Changing environment Realise opportunities Project methodology OPEN 1.8 Client satisfaction Reduces investment costs Improves staff morale Enhances reputation Keep promises DAY 1.7

Project methodology OPEN 1.8 Knowledge base Documents lessons learned Templates future projects Culture of project excellence Leverage success Which is best? OPEN 1.8 DAY 1.8

Activity 1.2 Why do we document our projects? Can we ever over-document projects? Project assets (templates) OPEN 1.9 DAY 1.9

OPEN Unit 1: Project frameworks OPEN Unit 3: Alternatives analysis Opportunity definition Project lifecycle The triple constraints Project concept canvas OPEN 1.5 Project lifecycle DAY 1.10

Activity 1.3 Reflect on a project you have recently contributed to How well did you (or the project team) test the project concept with stakeholders? plan the project? manage change during project delivery? capture and communicate lessons learned? The cost of change OPEN 1.6 DAY 1.11

The triple constraints OPEN 1.7 Activity 1.4 When might a project have too much time or money? DAY 1.12

Project initiation Doing the project right OPEN 3.0 Doing the right project OPEN 3.0 Project initiation DAY 1.13

OPEN 3.1 Opportunity definition Current v ideal state Link to the objectives of the organisation paying for it What outcomes / benefits do we need to have? What outcomes / benefits would be nice to have? What is out of scope? And when is the latest we can start? Who do we need to get involved from Day 1? Estimate range ±30-50% Authorise development of business case DAY 1.14

Upgrade office technology Improve efficiency and customer service Improve productivity Be scalable for growth Integrate with existing technology Enable new service channels Reduce energy costs Office furniture Telephones Start before end of financial year No more than 6 months to deliver $50,000 - $80,000 Office manager IT manager IT consultants Activity 1.5 The boss wants to honour high performing project managers in our organisation Prepare a project concept canvas for this opportunity PRO TIP Brainstorm benefits before you decide whether they are must or might have outcomes for your solution! DAY 1.15

OPEN Unit 3: Alternatives analysis Alternatives analysis Alternatives identification Feasibility analysis Cost estimation OPEN 3.2 Alternatives identification DAY 1.16

Alternatives OPEN 3.2 What is the optimal way to realise this opportunity? OPEN 3.2 Creative thinking Alternatives identification Generating ideas Reflection Brainstorming Secondary sources Organising ideas Lists Mind-maps Flowcharts Critical thinking Alternatives analysis Threshold feasibility Is this something people want? Is this something we can do? Is this something we can afford? Is this something we are allowed to do? DAY 1.17

Activity 1.6 Identify five (5) alternative ways to realise the outcomes identified in the project concept canvas OPEN 3.2 Feasibility analysis DAY 1.18

Relative feasibility OPEN 3.2 Questions to ask Do people want Option A more than Option B? Is it easier for us to produce Option A than B? Is Option A more affordable than Option B? Other methods to use Pros and cons SWOT analysis PESTLE analysis DAY 1.19

OPEN 3.6 Project costs Estimating project (output) costs OPEN 5.5 Analogous estimates Parametric estimates Mean (average) Median Mode Three-point estimates DAY 1.20

Problem OPEN 5.5 Past performance suggests that freighting a widget from New York to Hobart usually takes about 10 days; however, if the planets align correctly, it can arrive in as few as seven Once though, it actually took 25 days to arrive, and the project suffered as a result How much time should the project team build into their schedule to allow for the widget to arrive? Three point estimate OPEN 5.5 Best case 7 days Most likely 10 days Worst case 25 days t E = (t O + 4t M + t P ) 6 (7 + (4 x 10) + 25) 6 = 12 DAY 1.21

Activity 1.7 We need to engage a consultant on a project, but don t really know how much that is going to cost, so we reviewed similar projects to get a reliable estimate We found on a project of this type it usually costs around $7,500; although the true range of prices was $6,000 to $12,000 Using the three-point estimate formula, how much should the project team allow in their budget for consultancy? DAY 1.22

OPEN 3.7 Net financial impact Ownership (outcome) costs OPEN 3.7 Operating costs Infrastructure (eg rent) Labour Materials Power & water Insurances Interfaces (eg IT) Strategic costs Repairs & maintenance Operator training Upgrades / scalability Decommissioning DAY 1.23

Activity 1.8 A new car costs $20,000 to purchase and $5,000 per year to operate A second-hand car costs $5,000 to purchase and $10,000 per year to operate Which is the better option over two (2) years? Which is the better option over four (4) years? Net financial impact OPEN 3.7 Post-project revenue less ownership (outcome) costs Profit / loss Annualise if possible to enable comparison What is the useful life of each alternative? DAY 1.24

Net financial impact (profit) OPEN 3.7 OPEN 3.7 DAY 1.25

Activity 1.9 Why is it important to accurately estimate financial costs and impacts? What are the potential consequences of under-estimating? What are the potential consequences of over-estimating? How accurate do we need to be in the business case? Activity 1.9 Why is it important to accurately estimate project costs? What are the potential consequences of under-estimating? What are the potential consequences of over-estimating? How accurate do we need to be in the business case? -20% -10% Actual +10% +20% Business case DAY 1.26

OPEN Unit 3: Alternatives analysis The business case Quantifying outcomes Organisational risk Multi-criteria analysis OPEN 3.8 Other impacts DAY 1.27

OPEN 3.8 Other impacts Intangibles Knowledge / skills Productivity Stakeholder networks Brand / reputation Corporate culture Community well-being How will we know if our project is a success? Who is impacted? Our organisation Our clients The community The environment How can we measure these benefits? Activity 1.10 Identify potential impacts for the identified alternatives How will you measure these impacts if the project alternative is selected? # clients served / # widgets produced per hour? customer satisfaction score (out of 10)? staff turnover / training costs reduced by x%? # net favourable social media mentions? # safety incidents and near-misses DAY 1.28

Other (intangible) impacts OPEN 3.8 OPEN 3.8 DAY 1.29

OPEN 3.9 Risk analysis Risk analysis OPEN 3.9 What are the risks to the organisation of each alternative? What are the risks to the organisation of doing nothing? The risks to project delivery are analysed in the project plan DAY 1.30

Risk to the organisation time OPEN 3.9 Risk to the organisation cost OPEN 3.9 DAY 1.31

Risk to the organisation scope OPEN 3.9 Risk to the organisation experience OPEN 3.9 DAY 1.32

Risk to the organisation importance OPEN 3.9 Risk to the organisation operations OPEN 3.9 DAY 1.33

Risk to the organisation dependencies OPEN 3.9 Risk to the organisation brand OPEN 3.9 DAY 1.34

Risk to the organisation safety OPEN 3.9 Activity 1.11 Perform an organisational risk assessment for an awards night DAY 1.35

OPEN 3.10 OPEN 3.10 Recommendation DAY 1.36

Multi criteria analysis Compare alternatives across common criteria Use standard scores for each criteria Best score wins! Criteria should be clearly defined by the organisation Criteria can also be weighted by the organisation Multi criteria analysis (MCA) OPEN 3.10 Option Zero Do nothing Has no project cost Option 1 - $2500 bonus Will cost 2-5% of our program budget Option 2 Awards night Will cost 10-20% of our program budget DAY 1.37

Multi criteria analysis (MCA) OPEN 3.10 Option 1 - $2500 bonus Will increase our profit by less than 1% Option 2 Awards night Will increase our profit by less than 1-2% Multi criteria analysis (MCA) OPEN 3.10 Option 1: Improve org / stakeholder well-being by 1-2% Option 2: Improve org / stakeholder by 2-5% DAY 1.38

Multi criteria analysis (MCA) OPEN 3.10 Weighted MCA OPEN 3.10 DAY 1.39

Sample recommendation OPEN 4.1 It is recommended that detailed planning commence on Option B. A complete project plan is to be presented for Board approval in four (4) weeks time The plan should continue the assumptions made in the business case, and include a detailed WBS, schedule, budget, stakeholder and risk registers and any other documentation deemed relevant by the PMO The PMO should also recommend at that time the appointment of a suitably qualified project manager and project steering committee If the assumptions of the business case are invalidated by the planning process, the board should be duly advised and a new course of action recommended It is proposed that a budget of $15,000 be allocated to planning the project Other recommendation detail OPEN 4.1 Planning constraints Time key milestones Cost high-level budget Scope key deliverables Quality acceptance criteria Critical success factors For example Resource availability assumptions Other project dependencies Key stakeholder relationships Known project risks https://institute.pm/free-project-management-resources/ DAY 1.40

Activity 1.12 What are some other criteria you could use to evaluate project alternatives? DAY 1.41