Re: Possible Solvency and Financial Condition Report components subject to assurance

Similar documents
The Central Bank s Requirement for External Audit of Solvency II Regulatory Returns / Public Disclosures

EIOPA's Supervisory Statement. Solvency II: Solvency and Financial Condition Report

REQUEST TO EIOPA FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE ON THE REVIEW OF THE SOLVENCY II DIRECTIVE (DIRECTIVE 2009/138/EC)

EIOPA-CP-13/ March Cover note for the Consultation on Guidelines on preparing for Solvency II

EIOPACP 13/010. Guidelines on Submission of Information to National Competent Authorities

PRA RULEBOOK SOLVENCY II FIRMS: REPORTING INSTRUMENT 2015

Cover note. Public consultation on:

Consultation Paper on the draft proposal for Guidelines on reporting and public disclosure

Technical provisions best estimate risk-free interest rate curve

EIOPA Final Report on Public Consultations No. 13/011 on the Proposal for Guidelines on the Pre!application for Internal Models

Final Report. Public Consultation No. 14/036 on. Guidelines on undertaking-specific. parameters

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

(Text with EEA relevance)

Insurance Europe Position Paper on the Solvency II Reporting Package. ECO-SLV Date: 15 May 2012

CEA proposed amendments, April 2008

COVER NOTE TO ACCOMPANY THE DRAFT QIS5 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

EIOPA- CP-14/ November 2014

Proposal for the Quality Assurance of the Solvency II capital requirements, own funds and balance sheet

Pillar 3 reporting for Life Companies

CEIOPS-DOC-61/10 January Former Consultation Paper 65

THE SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT

Solvency II. Insurance and Pensions Unit, European Commission

Solvency II. New Rules in Europe for the Insurance Industry. Lecture at UConn Law, January 28, 2013

Cover note for the draft consultation papers on the Guidelines and ITS for Solvency II (set 2)

Delegations will find below a Presidency compromise text on the above Commission proposal, to be discussed at the 28 February 2011 meeting.

Solvency II Detailed guidance notes

Technical Annex I Information provided by the other supervisory authorities to the group supervisor

We referred to ICP 20 which deals with public disclosures and is therefore directly comparable to the SFCR.

EIOPA15/ Nov 2015

Solvency and financial condition report 2017

Karel VAN HULLE. Head of Unit, Insurance and Pensions, DG Markt, European Commission

Final Report on public consultation No. 14/049 on Guidelines on the implementation of the long-term guarantee measures

Delegations will find below a Presidency compromise text on the above Commission proposal, as a result of the 17 June meeting.

PRA RULEBOOK: SOLVENCY II FIRMS: GROUP SUPERVISION INSTRUMENT 2015

1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

Final input from the Groupe Consultatif in regard to the development of Level 3 guidance on the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)

Solvency and Financial Condition Report Trafalgar Insurance plc

EIOPA Proposal for Guidelines on the preparation for Solvency II. October Milliman Solvency II Update

Final report on public consultation No. 14/060 on the implementing. technical standards with regard to. standard deviations in relation to health risk

PRA Solvency II update James Orr. 29 April 2015

SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (SAM) FRAMEWORK

CONSULTATION DOCUMENT

Final report on public consultation No. 14/052 on the implementing. technical standards on the templates for. the submission of information to the

Report on the use of capital add-ons 2017

Report on long-term guarantees measures and measures on equity risk

Solvency and Financial Condition Report Trafalgar Insurance plc

Appendix 2: Supervisory Statements

Consultation Paper. the draft proposal for. Guidelines. on the implementation of the long term. guarantee adjustments and transitional.

Consultation Paper CP23/14. Solvency II approvals

EU publications Online survey for assessment of insurance based investment products Page 2

Solvency & Financial Condition Report Centrewrite Limited

Actuaries and the Regulatory Environment. Role of the Actuary in the Solvency II framework

Supervisory Statement SS15/15 Solvency II: approvals. March Appendix 2.15

Number Date Reference

Consultation Paper. the draft proposal for. Guidelines. on reporting for financial stability. purposes

Regulatory Consultation Paper Round-up

REPORT ON THE USE OF LIMITATIONS AND EXEMPTIONS FROM REPORTING DURING 2017 AND Q1 2018

CEIOPS-DOC-06/06. November 2006

Subject: Request to EIOPA for an opinion on sustainability within Solvency II

EIOPA's Supervisory Assessment. of the. Own Risk and Solvency Assessment. - First experiences -

2017 Public Quantitative Reporting Templates Solvency II Aegon Levensverzekering N.V.

EIOPA-CP-14/ November 2014

PRA Solvency II regulatory reporting update IFoA

2017 Solvency and Financial Condition Report. Delta Lloyd Levensverzekering N.V.

CEIOPS-DOC-27/09. (former CP32) October 2009

Report on the use of limitations and exemptions from reporting 2017

REPORT ON THE USE OF CAPITAL ADD-ONS DURING 2017

Solvency Assessment and Management (SAM)

Lancashire Holdings Limited

Solvency II Update. Latest developments and industry challenges (Session 10) Réjean Besner

SAM QRT Workshop Asset Templates April 2013

Tax in Solvency II. Ayesha Patel. 10 June Tel: June 2014

FRAMEWORK FOR SUPERVISORY INFORMATION

Solvency II: finally final

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

January CNB opinion on Commission consultation document on Solvency II implementing measures

Understanding the prudential balance sheet. Lars Dieckhoff Principal expert Solvency II

Hot Topic: Understanding the implications of QIS5

Guidance on the Actuarial Function MARCH 2018

Opinion on the solvency position of insurance and reinsurance undertakings in light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union

2017 Solvency and Financial Condition Report. Delta Lloyd Schadeverzekering N.V.

2016 Public Quantitative Reporting Templates Solvency II Aegon Spaarkas N.V.

Financial Assurance Company Limited

DISCLOSURE QRT REPORT Proteq Levensverzekeringen 2017

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Link between Pillar 1 and Pillar 2

Society of Actuaries in Ireland Solvency II for Beginners. Mike Frazer. 19 May 2011


Quantitave reporting templates Appendix SFCR Leven. jij, je pensioen en

Solvency ii Association G Street NW Suite 800 Washington, DC USA Tel:

FS Regulatory Centre of Excellence, 2 December Hot Topic. Solvency II requirements published. 3. Provisional equivalence of third countries.

TEMPLATE C FOR THE DISCLOSURE OF QUANTITATIVE AGGREGATE STATISTICAL DATA ON THE SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY

CEIOPS-Secretariat Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors Westhafenplatz Frankfurt am Main Germany

Solvency II and Pension Funds. Instituto de seguros de Portugal 25 Oct Lisbon

WHITE PAPER. Solvency II Compliance and beyond: Title The essential steps for insurance firms

S Solvency Capital Requirement for groups using the standard formula and partial internal model

The Solvency II project and the work of CEIOPS

Solvency Regulation in the UAE: A Benchmark and Impact Study

(Text with EEA relevance)

FINAL REPORT ON GUIDELINES ON UNIFORM DISCLOSURE OF IFRS 9 TRANSITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS EBA/GL/2018/01 12/01/2018. Final report

Transcription:

Ms Sandra Hack European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) Westhafenplatz 1 D-60327 Frankfurt am Main 10 January 2012 Ref.: INS/PRJ/SKU/IDS Dear Ms Hack, Re: Possible Solvency and Financial Condition Report components subject to assurance (1) FEE (the Federation of European Accountants) is pleased to provide you with its suggestions on the Solvency II Financial Condition Report ( SFCR ) components that should be by external auditors. (2) The document is the outcome of our ongoing dialogue on the auditors involvement in the Solvency II reporting as a means of enhancing the quality of public reports and to address users expectation gaps. Many relevant points were summarised in the FEE Briefing Paper Enhancing the Quality of Solvency II Public Reporting Benefits of Harmonising Auditor Reporting for the Users issued in August 2010, a copy of which was sent to EIOPA. (3) At our meeting with representatives of the European Commission DG Internal Markets and Services and representatives of the EIOPA Internal Governance, Supervisory Review and Reporting Expert Group on 12 July 2011, we committed to provide EIOPA with a document that included a proposed subset of the SFCR that should be by an independent auditor in order to address the existing expectation gaps of the users. (4) Now that the EIOPA public consultation 1 has been launched, we have finalised this letter and make references to concrete proposals therein. We hope you will find our suggestions convincing. We firmly believe that assurance provided on the subset suggested by us will enhance the quality of public reporting on solvency. 1 Draft proposal on Quantitative Reporting Templates and Draft proposal for Guidelines on Narrative Public Disclosure & Supervisory Reporting, Predefined Events and Processes for Reporting & Disclosure

Page 2 of 10 (5) In the context of private reporting, we provided Ms Kraśniewska from EIOPA with the letter on Role of the External Auditor vs. Role of the Insurance Supervisor on 18 October 2011 in which we elaborated on how the provision of independent assurance on data submitted to the supervisor could assist them so that they can focus on taking relevant measures and draw conclusions about the insurance industry as a whole. We included examples of auditor s involvement and possible degrees of assurance to be provided. Thus you could find that letter helpful in the SFCR context as well. (6) This letter is provided solely for your internal use. We are at your disposal to discuss further and/or provide any additional information you may need in due course. For further information on this letter, please contact Sylwia Kujawa, Project Manager from the FEE Secretariat on +32 (0) 2 285 40 86 or via email at sylwia.kujawa@fee.be. Yours sincerely, Philip Johnson President

Page 3 of 10 Possible Solvency and Financial Condition Report components subject to assurance (1) FEE identified the subset that should be subject to providing assurance by an independent auditor as: - Solvency II balance sheet; - Own funds; - Variance analysis, explaining all changes in basic own funds; The variance analysis is not equivalent to a profit and loss account and it is not intended to include it in the SFCR. Nevertheless, we would include it in the audited subset because relational testing - the reconciliation between the opening balance and closing balance sheet - is an important audit procedure as it gives assurance over accuracy and completeness of the closing balance sheet (e.g. the development in basic own funds during a reporting period). - Statement of available solvency; - Solvency Capital Requirement; - Minimum Capital Requirement; - Risk paragraph; - Explanatory notes on the basis for estimation, parameters and assumptions used, and estimation uncertainty, as well as the differences between the Solvency II balance sheet and the financial statement balance sheet. - Sufficient qualitative and quantitative information to create understanding as regards (movements in) the various assets, insurance liabilities and other liabilities. Assurance can be provided on both solo and group level. The above suggestions are based on the thorough analysis of the EIOPA draft proposal on Quantitative Reporting Templates as well as the draft proposal for Guidelines on Narrative Public Disclosure & Supervisory Reporting as developed by EIOPA. (2) The selection of this subset is determined by whether reasonable assurance can be provided without undue cost, such that the benefit to users exceeds the cost. In addition to the nature of the financial information (historical vs. future oriented) auditability also depends on internal controls (covering data quality aspects) over the capture and recording of the information. i.e. whether or not appropriate internal control systems are in place. (3) Hence, the financial statement type information within the SFCR was selected to be part of the subset, while the more MD&A or management report type of information has been left out; similar to financial statement audits, the role of the auditor would be restricted to report on inconsistencies in the MD&A type of information with the audited subset.

Page 4 of 10 (4) The SCR and supporting information was selected to be part of the subset because this information is considered crucial to the users of the SFCR and the benefits of audited information are deemed to exceed the extra audit expense. Because the presentation, measurement and disclosure requirements of the SFCR are well described, we are confident that a reasonable assurance level can be delivered. (5) Reasonable assurance that an auditor is able to obtain is not a generic one but rather the one reasonable in the circumstances of the individual assignment. In particular, in auditing risk and the assumptions regarding future developments, the auditor cannot obtain as high level of assurance as it is possible in respect of certain other items of historical financial information. (6) Participating insurance and reinsurance undertakings or insurance holding companies are required to disclose publicly information on the solvency and financial condition at the level of the group. The Directive also allows them (subject to permission of the group supervisor) to provide a single solvency and financial condition report comprising both that information and the solvency and financial condition information required in relation to any of their subsidiaries. Therefore, we assume that the audited subset is often a group SFCR and certain relevant solvency information of individual undertakings. (7) In the annex to this letter, the audited subset of the SCR has been linked to the individual captions of the SFCR, according to the latest insights of the quantitative reporting templates that will be attached to the SFCR and the content of the SFCR in line with the latest available level 2 text. Our analysis may be subject to change if the final level 2 and 3 regulations are modified. (8) The audit of the SCR and the supporting and explanatory information is of particular relevance. Our tentative view is that this information is key to users of the SFCR and that it potentially meets the requirements for delivering reasonable assurance to this information. However, the insurance industry has limited history in fully bringing this information under the discipline of control over financial reporting. We have included this information in the audited subset and we propose having further discussions on this topic.

Page 5 of 10 ANNEX: Details of the proposed SFCR subset (The Quantitative Reporting Templates have been presented in italics) Key information for identification purposes Entities in the scope of the group (a) the name and legal form of the undertaking; (b) the name and contact details of the supervisory authority responsible for financial supervision of the undertaking and, where applicable, the name and contact details of the group supervisor of the group to which the undertaking belongs; (c) a description of the holders of qualifying holdings in the undertaking; (d) where the undertaking belongs to a group, details of where the undertaking sits within the legal structure of the group; (e) the undertaking s material lines of business and material geographical areas where it writes business; Solvency II balance sheet Balance sheet (solo and group reporting) Analysis of changes in basic own funds, including details on sources of earnings. A statement of sources of earnings could be presented separately. Analysis of changes in basic own funds (solo reporting) Statement of available solvency Own funds (solo and group reporting) The following information shall be disclosed by insurance and reinsurance undertakings regarding their own funds: (b) separately for each tier, information on the structure, amount and quality of own funds at the end of the reporting period and at the end of the previous reporting period, including an analysis of the significant changes in each tier over the reporting period;

Page 6 of 10 (c) the eligible amount of own funds to cover the Solvency Capital Requirement, classified by tiers; (d) the eligible amount of own funds to cover the Minimum Capital Requirement, classified by tiers; (e) a quantitative and qualitative explanation of any material differences between equity as shown in the undertaking s financial statements and the excess of assets over liabilities as calculated for solvency purposes; (g) for each material item of ancillary own funds: a description of the item, the amount of the ancillary own-fund item and, where appropriate, the method by which to determine the amount of the ancillary own-fund item, as well as the nature and the names of the counterparty or group of counterparties when there are many minor parties, to the extent that such disclosure is legally possible and practicable; (h) a description of any item deducted from own funds and of any significant restriction affecting the availability and transferability of own funds within the undertaking. Solvency Capital Requirement Solvency Capital Requirement (solo and group reporting) (Re)insurance solo requirements (group reporting) Non-(re) insurance solo requirements (group reporting) The following information shall be disclosed by insurance and reinsurance undertakings regarding their Solvency Capital Requirement and their Minimum Capital Requirement: (a) the amounts of the undertaking s Solvency Capital Requirement and the Minimum Capital Requirement at the end of the reporting period, together with an indication that the final amount of the Solvency Capital Requirement is still subject to supervisory assessment; (b) the amount of the undertaking s Solvency Capital Requirement split by risk modules where the undertaking applies the standard formula, and by risk categories where the undertaking applies an internal model; (c) information on whether and for which risks the undertaking is using simplified calculations or undertaking specific parameters pursuant to Article 104(7) of Directive 2009/138/EC,in the standard formula or a partial or a full internal model; (d) unless the undertaking s Member State has made use of the option provided for in the third subparagraph of Article 51 (2) of Directive 2009/138/EC, the impact of any undertaking-specific parameters used by the undertaking in applying the standard formula in accordance with Article 110 of Directive 2009/138/EC and the amount of any capital add-on applied to the Solvency Capital Requirement, together with concise information on its justification by the supervisory authority concerned;

Page 7 of 10 (f) any material change in the Solvency Capital Requirement and in the Minimum Capital Requirement over the reporting period, and the reasons for any material change. Minimum Capital Requirement Minimum Capital Requirement (solo reporting) See details above for SCR and MCR information. Risk paragraph Insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall disclose qualitative and quantitative information regarding their risk profile,separately for the following categories of risk: (a) underwriting risk; (b) market risk; (c) credit risk; (d) liquidity risk; (e) operational risk; (f) other material risks. With regard to risk concentration, insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall disclose a description of the material risk concentrations to which the undertaking is exposed. With regard to risk sensitivity insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall disclose a description of the methods used, the assumptions made and the outcome of stress testing and sensitivity analysis for material risks and events. Risk concentration general (group reporting) Explanatory notes on the basis for estimation, parameters and assumptions used, and estimation uncertainty, as well as the differences between the Solvency II balance sheet and the financial statement balance sheet. The following information shall be disclosed by insurance and reinsurance undertakings regarding the valuation of

Page 8 of 10 their assets for solvency purposes: (a) separately for each material class of assets, the amount of the assets, as well as a description of the basis, methods and main assumptions used for valuation for solvency purposes; (b) separately for each material class of assets, a quantitative and qualitative explanation of any material differences between the basis, methods and main assumptions used by the undertaking for solvency purposes and those used for their valuation in financial statements. The following information shall be disclosed by insurance and reinsurance undertakings regarding the valuation of their technical provisions for solvency purposes: (a) separately for each material line of business the amount of technical provisions, including the amount of the best estimate and the risk margin, as well as a description of the basis, methods and main assumptions used for their valuation for solvency purposes; (b) a description of the level of uncertainty associated with the amount of technical provisions; (c) separately for each material line of business, a quantitative and qualitative explanation of any material differences between the basis, methods and main assumptions used by the undertaking for solvency purposes and those used for their valuation in financial statements. (d) where applicable, information on whether the insurance or reinsurance undertaking is using the transitional provisions on the risk-free interest rate term structure referred to in Article IR8 and [the quantitative impact on the valuation of technical provisions where those transitional provisions are used]; (e) a description of: (i) the relevant assumptions about future management actions, (ii) the relevant assumptions about policy holder behaviour, (iii) the recoverables from reinsurance contracts and special purpose vehicles, (iv) the illiquidity premium corresponding to the insurance and reinsurance obligations, (v) any material changes in the relevant assumptions made in the calculation of technical provisions compared to the previous reporting period. The following information shall be disclosed by insurance and reinsurance undertakings regarding the valuation of their other liabilities for solvency purposes:

Page 9 of 10 (a) separately for ach material class of other liabilities the amount of other liabilities as well as a description of the basis, methods and main assumptions used for their valuation for solvency purposes; (b) separately for each material class of other liabilities, a quantitative and qualitative explanation of any material differences with the valuation basis, methods and main assumptions used by the undertaking for solvency purposes and those used for their valuation in financial statements. Insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall include appropriate information on the areas set out in Article 254 (1) [x2 IM3] in complying with their supervisory reporting and public disclosure requirements. Insurance and reinsurance undertakings shall disclose in a separate section any other material information regarding the valuation of assets and liabilities for solvency purposes. Sufficient qualitative and quantitative information to create understanding as regards the (movements in) the various assets, insurance liabilities and other liabilities. Off-balance sheet items (solo reporting) Premiums, claims and expenses (solo reporting) Life and health SLT technical provisions (solo reporting) Non-life technical provisions (solo reporting) Contribution to group SCR with D & A (group reporting) IGT derivatives (group reporting) The following information shall be disclosed by insurance and reinsurance undertakings regarding the option set out in Article 304 of Directive 2009/138/EC: (a) an indication that the undertaking is using the duration-based equity risk sub-module set out in that Article for the calculation of its Solvency Capital Requirement, after approval from its supervisory authority; (b) the amount of the capital requirement for the duration-based equity risk sub-module resulting from such use. The following information shall be disclosed in addition to any other information related to that internal model which is already reported in any other part of the solvency and financial condition report, by insurance and reinsurance undertakings where an internal model used to calculate their Solvency Capital Requirement:

Page 10 of 10 (c) where a partial internal model is used, a description of the technique which has been used to integrate any partial internal model into the standard formula including, where relevant, a description of non standardised techniques used; (d) a description of the methods used in the internal model for the calculation of the probability distribution forecast and the Solvency Capital Requirement; (e) an explanation - in general terms and by risk module - of the main differences in the methodologies and underlying assumptions used in the standard formula and in the internal model; (f) the risk measure and time period used in the internal model, and where they are not the same as those set out in Article 101(3) of Directive 2009/138/EC, an explanation of why the Solvency Capital Requirement calculated using the internal model provides policy holders and beneficiaries with a level of protection equivalent to that set out in Article 101 of Directive 2009/138/EC. (g) a description of the nature and appropriateness of the data used in the internal model. The following information shall be disclosed by insurance and reinsurance undertakings regarding any noncompliance with their Minimum Capital Requirement or significant non-compliance with their Solvency Capital Requirement: (a) regarding any non-compliance with the undertaking s Minimum Capital Requirement: the period and maximum amount of each non-compliance during the reporting period, an explanation of its origin and consequences, any remedial measures taken, as provided for under Article 51(1) (e) (v) of Directive 2009/138/EC and an explanation of the effects of such remedial measures; (b) where non-compliance with the undertaking s Minimum Capital Requirement has not been subsequently resolved: the amount of the non-compliance at the reporting date; (c) regarding any significant non-compliance with the undertaking s Solvency Capital Requirement during the reporting period as defined in Article COF 2 (3): the period and maximum amount of each significant non-compliance and, in addition to the explanation of its origin and consequences as well as any remedial measures taken, as provided for under point (e) (v) of Article 51(1) of Directive 2009/138/EC, an explanation of the effects of such remedial measures; (d) where a significant non-compliance with the undertaking s Solvency Capital Requirement has not been subsequently resolved: the amount of the non-compliance at the reporting date.