E S T E S P A R K V I S I T O R S S T U D Y H I G H L I G H T S

Similar documents
Lake Tahoe Visitors Authority. Visitor Profile Study Top Line Results Preliminary Summer + Fall 2015

Truckee Donner Chamber of Commerce Visitor Profile Study. Four Season Visitor Profile Study 2013/14

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TOURISM IN VERMONT: SPRING & SUMMER 2001

Mountain Biking Economic Impact Study - Squamish

Mountain Biking Economic Impact Study - Pemberton

VDTM3436 Economic Impact Study Brochure

Understanding the Visitor to Kansas City. August 2013

Profile of Visitors to Tompkins County

Metropolitan Council: Regional Parks System Visitor Study Report. November, 2016

2018 Major League Baseball Florida Spring Training Economic Impact Study. Joseph St. Germain, Ph.D. Phillip Downs, Ph.D.

Snohomish County Strategic Tourism Plan Snohomish County Office of Economic Development

Understanding Shareholders Use of Information and Advisers

Welcome To Rockville Intercept Survey Report. April 26 th -27 th, 2014

RESEARCH BRIEF. No. 3 April The Economic Contributions of Tourism in Utah A Regional Comparison

April Hilltop Road, Suite 1001, Ramsey, NJ Phone: Fax:

THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE 2011 SUNDANCE FILM FESTIVAL HELD IN UTAH FROM JANUARY 20, 2011 TO JANUARY 30, 2011

Jacksonville Jazz Festival Intercept Survey Report. May 22 nd -25 th, 2014

California s Beaches. Philip King, Ph.D. San Francisco State University

Texas Highways Reader Profile Study

OKOBOJI TOURISM RESEARCH SUMMARY REPORT OBICREATIVE NOVEMBER 28, 2017

2014 Travel Like a Local Summer Travel Survey

TRENDS ONLINE. Updated Release of Local Economic Data Last updated April 3, 2018; Some annual figures not yet available for 2017

Report on Council and Senior Staff Planning Retreat December 17 and 18, Presentation to Council January 27, 2015

2016 Q4 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY

Reflections in the Mirror: Defined contribution plan participants

City of Port Moody Citizen Survey. Presented by: Catherine Knaus, Ipsos Reid

2015 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Draft Report February 20, 2015

Northern California Chapter

THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE 2012 SUNDANCE FILM FESTIVAL HELD IN UTAH FROM JANUARY 19, 2012 TO JANUARY 29, 2012

Economic Impact of Mountain Biking in the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre & Gunnison National Forests

Lowcountry and Resort Islands Institute at USCB Kelli Brunson Catherine Moorman Dr. John Salazar. May 2, 2015 USCB 2015.

Industry Insight. U.S. Membership Profile

MICROMARKET REPORT BOULDER

Laying the Groundwork for Growth and Engagement: Trends and Insights from the 2015 Research Study

TOURISM CREATES MAJOR ECONOMIC BENEFITS FOR LANCASTER COUNTY

Introduction...1. Project Overview.2. Cache la Poudre River NHA Economic Impact 4. Conclusion..10. Appendix A: Glossary of Terms 11

Economic Impact Study Report. Subject: Proposed Hopkinsville, KY, Sports Center. Prepared by: Pinnacle Indoor Sports. Date: October 2016

Downtown Boulder User Survey October 2014

Texas Gulf Coast Chapter

HONG KONG DISNEYLAND ANNUAL BUSINESS REVIEW FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2009

MICROMARKET REPORT EVERGREEN

PARKWAY COUNCIL ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT

Scottsdale Tourism Study - Visitor Statistics

A Sublette County Profile: Socioeconomics

O R E G O N T O U R I S M L I S T EN I N G S E S S I O N S U MMA R Y June 2018

The CFSI Underbanked Consumer Study Underbanked Consumer Overview & Market Segments Fact Sheet

Important Anchor for Topeka Heritage Tourism

Swan Hill Incorporated Annual Marketing Plan & Budget

Downtown Cincinnati Perceptions Survey Results

Economic Impact Overview: Triple Crown. 5/29/15 Yampa Valley Data Partners

Arvada, Colorado. Citizen Survey. Report of Results October Prepared by:

EMPLOYER COSTS FOR EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION JUNE 2010

Linking and liaising with Balance of Payments compilation in measuring inbound and outbound tourism

Economic Impact of the Arroyo Seco Music and Arts Festival on the City of Pasadena

November 28, Acting Director Mike Reynolds National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240

THE PEOPLE S COAST. Oregon Coast Visitors Association (OCVA)

Industry Council for Tangible Assets, Inc. Kathy McFadden, Executive Director IN SUPPORT OF

Assistant Finance Director

City of Lethbridge 2014 Community Satisfaction Survey. Key Findings August 2014

2012 ARMY MWR SERVICES SURVEY

CONSUMER PULSE ONLINE SURVEY FLORIDA February 2010 Vacation Travel

AN ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF A COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITY IN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS

Scottsdale Tourism Study - Visitor Statistics

Reasons to Go

Economic accounts office

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TRAVEL ON GEORGIA 2004 PROFILE

1 st Community Meeting Western Springs Downtown Redevelopment Plan. January 13 th, Agenda

September Hong Kong Jewellery & Gem Fair 2018

CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE Citizen Survey. Survey conducted by Prairie Research Associates May 2017

LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES - CITY ATTORNEYS SPRING CONFERENCE. Short-Term Rental Regulatory Issues

Box Elder County Tourism Tax Advisory Board 2011 Grant Packet

Southern Illinois Chapter

New Hampshire Vermont Chapter

The Economic Impact Of Travel on Massachusetts Counties 2015

The Economic Impact of Travel on Massachusetts Counties 2009

McMahon Illini Chapter

Citizen Budget Budget Consultation Online Summary Report. November 25, Overview:

2015 Mid-Year Economic Update

The Economic Impact of Spending for Operations and Construction in 2013 by AZA-Accredited Zoos and Aquariums

The Economic Impact of the Ohio River Greenway Project: Usage and Visitor Spending07May2015

The Local Economic Impact of Short Term Rentals in Galveston, Texas

The 2007 Retiree Survey

NEW JERSEY VOTERS LIKE GARDEN STATE VACATIONS, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; BUT 87% WANT BATHROOMS AT THE BEACH

Guam Visitors Bureau. Japan Visitor Tracker Exit Profile & Market Segmentation Report FY2018 JANUARY 2018

Industry Insight. Asia/Pacific Membership Profile

NEBRASKA RURAL POLL. A Research Report. Earning a Living in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska Nebraska Rural Poll Results

Bend Summer Visitor Research 2008 Final Results. March 2009 RRC Associates

Economic Impacts Associated with Improvements to Storm Lake

The Impact of the Tourism Sector on the Vermont Economy: The Input-Output Analysis

2014 Customer Satisfaction Survey For South Liverpool Homes. Chris Elliott Vicki Harris

State-Based Financing Tools. Rob Hunden Hunden Strategic Partners

2017 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Final Report

Georgia World Congress Center and Georgia Dome Economic Impact Analysis FY 2017

Vail Resorts Reports Fiscal 2015 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results and Provides Fiscal 2016 Outlook

2018 Budget Planning Survey General Population Survey Results

Greater Des Moines Water Trails & Greenways Economic Impact Study

How Public Education Benefits from the Federal Income Tax Deduction for State and Local Taxes and Other Special Tax Provisions

Cairngorms Business Barometer Quarter 3 (July to September) 2016 Summary Report

Impact of Lodging & Meals Local Option Taxes

AMERICA S BYWAYS RESOURCE CENTER JOURNEY THROUGH HALLOWED GROUND ECONOMIC IMPACT TOOL: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Transcription:

E S T E S P A R K 2 0 1 0-2 0 1 1 V I S I T O R S S T U D Y H I G H L I G H T S

R E S E A R C H B A C K G R O U N D A N D O B J E C T I V E S In 2010, the Estes Park LMD initiated a year-long Visitors Study designed to determine the following objectives: V I S I T O R P R O F I L E : Examine who visits Estes Park S E L E C T I O N P R O C E S S : Determine how visitors decide to visit the area V I S I T E X P E R I E N C E : Perceptions and satisfaction with visit S L O G A N P O S I T I O N I N G : Evaluation of alternative positioning slogans V I S I T O R S P E N D I N G : Examined by visitor type

S U R V E Y M E T H O D O L O G Y S U R V E Y D E S I G N A N D E X E C U T I O N Designed in conjunction with the Estes Park LMD All surveys were conducted online (post-visit) Surveys collected from January 2010 February 2011 7,622 total surveys collected Very large and statistically robust survey sample V I S I T O R E M A I L C O L L E C T I O N Intercept method (using ipod Touch devices) Lodging properties lists URL printed on business cards (distributed at downtown retailers)

S U R V E Y M E T H O D O L O G Y S U R V E Y R E S P O N S E R AT E S A total of 7,622 Estes Park Visitor Study surveys were completed from January 16 th, 2010 through February 23 rd, 2011. This is a very large survey sample and allowed for detailed seasonal and market segmentation analyses. The completion percentage (40%) was excellent throughout the study. Survey response rates by source are detailed below: Survey Statistics Survey Source Sent Undelivered % Undelivered Delivered Viewed Completed % Completed* ipod 13,206 1,410 11% 11,796 5,594 5,227 44% YMCA 3,929 81 2% 3,848 1,580 1,435 37% Other Lodging Properties 2,511 96 4% 2,415 623 550 23% Survey Cards around Town N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 410 N/A All Sources (Total) 19,646 1,587 8% 18,059 7,797 7,622 40% * % Completed is calculated based on the total number of delivered surveys.

V I S I T O R S T U D Y H I G H L I G H T S

V I S I T O R P R O F I L E H O U S E H O L D I N C O M E 50% 40% 30% 20% 15% 21% 20% 24% 10% 6% 8% 7% 0% Less than $24,999 $25,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000 or more The median household income was $75,000 - $99,999 Overnight Visitors were more likely to make $100,00 or more Day Visitors were more likely to make $75,000 or less

V I S I T O R P R O F I L E H I G H E S T L E V E L O F E D U C AT I O N 50% 40% 38% 35% 30% 20% 15% 10% 11% 0% 0% Did not graduate high school High School Graduate College Graduate Some postgraduate work Post-graduate degree Survey respondents were highly educated. In total, over four-fifths of all survey respondents had a college degree or higher.

V I S I T O R P R O F I L E M O S T C O M M O N V I S I T O R O C C U PAT I O N S 50% 40% 30% 25% 20% 10% 15% 13% 11% 9% 6% 5% 0% Professional / Technical Executive / Manager / Owner Retired Teacher / Professor Other Homemaker Government / Military One-quarter of all respondents had professional/technical occupations. Other frequently cited occupations included Executive/Manager/Owner and Teacher/Professor occupations. 13% of respondents were retired.

V I S I T O R P R O F I L E Q U I C K FA C T S Survey Respondents 52% of the respondents surveyed downtown were Overnight Visitors. Overnight Visitors had a median visit frequency of 2-4 in the last 5 years. 41% of Day Visitors visited Estes Park as part of a longer trip; these visitors had a median visit frequency of one in the last 5 years. Day Visitors (not on a longer trip) had the highest median visit frequency of 2-4 visits per year. Overnight Visitors spend approximately 8 times what Day Visitors spend Median age was 45-54 years old 80% were in a party of 5 or less Over four-fifths of respondents were couples: 36% were couples with children; 31% were a couple with children no longer at home and 16% were couples with no children. Less than one-fifth of respondents were single. The primary purpose of the visit for 82% of respondents was for a vacation; An additional 10% of respondents were attending an event, festival, meeting, conference or convention. 98% were from the United States Over half were from outside of Colorado Non-Colorado Visitors most frequently came from Texas, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri and Illinois

V I S I T O R P R O F I L E D AY V I S I T O R S B Y C O U N T Y ( F R O N T R A N G E )

V I S I T O R P R O F I L E O V E R N I G H T V I S I T O R S B Y S TAT E

V I S I T O R E X P E R I E N C E L I K E L I H O O D T O R E C O M M E N D E S T E S PA R K Net Promoter Score* 79% Net of Promoters less Detractors Promoters (Definitely Recommend) 82% Loyal enthusiasts who continue to frequent Estes Park and urge their friends to do the same. Passives (Probably Recommend) Detractors (Might/Might Not, Probably Not, Definitely Not Recommend) 15% 3% Satisfied but unenthusiastic visitors who can be easily wooed by your competitors. Unhappy visitors who will not return and will tell others about their experience. Estes Park enjoys high loyalty as measured by the Net Promoter Score. *Note: The Visitors Study Net Promoter Score (NPS) is based on the Likelihood to Recommend question How likely are you to recommend the Estes Park area to others?. NPS is calculated by subtracting the percentage of Detractors (those rating their likelihood Might/Might Not or lower) from the percentage of Promoters (those rating their likelihood to recommend as Definitely ).

V I S I T O R E X P E R I E N C E L I K E L I H O O D T O R E C O M M E N D ( B Y S E A S O N ) 100% 80% 83% 81% 76% 80% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Winter 2010 Spring Summer Fall Winter 2011 The lowest ratings occurred during the busy Summer Season Scores are typically lower during the busiest tourism periods due to: Increase in crowds Longer Lines Limited parking availability

V I S I T O R E X P E R I E N C E S AT I S F A C T I O N W I T H E S T E S PA R K V I S I T % Excellent & Very Good (the top two ratings choices) Rocky Mountain National Park Outdoor Recreation Overall Experience Overall Staff Friendliness Downtown Area Festival / Special Event Overnight Lodging Overall Price/Value Shopping Dining Parking 98% 95% 94% 88% 82% 81% 79% 77% 71% 66% 58% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Visitors Overall Experience rating was high at 94% Shopping, dining and parking received the lowest ratings

V I S I T O R E X P E R I E N C E FA C T O R S I N D E C I S I O N T O V I S I T E S T E S PA R K % Extremely & Very Important (the top two rating choices) Relaxing Mountain Getaway Rocky Mountain National Park Wildlife Viewing Outdoor Recreation Low Cost / Good value Visiting Downtown Area Heritage / History / Culture Visiting Friends / Family in Area Visiting Lodging Property Festival / Special Event 16% 32% 29% 28% 57% 55% 89% 81% 81% 72% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% A Relaxing Mountain Getaway, Rocky Mountain National Park and Wildlife Viewing were the highest rated factors for visiting Estes Park. Seasonal differences were observed by demand generator: RMNP greatest importance during the Summer Relaxing Mountain Getaway greatest importance during the Winter Wildlife Viewing greatest importance during the Fall

V I S I T O R E X P E R I E N C E R O C K Y M O U N TA I N N AT I O N A L PA R K V I S I TAT I O N 100% 80% 73% 82% 67% 60% 40% 20% 0% All Visitors Overnight Visitors Day Visitors Note: Visitation percentages were calculated based on the number of respondents who rated their experience at Rocky Mountain National Park. Nearly three-fourths of all survey respondents visited Rocky Mountain National Park during their visit. Overnight Visitors were significantly more likely to visit the park than Day Visitors.

V I S I T O R P E R C E P T I O N S A C C U R A C Y O F P O S I T I O N I N G S L O G A N S % Very Accurate (the highest rating choice) Gateway to Rocky Mountain National Park 78% Outdoors, Family, Fun, Value 40% Where the Wildlife Roam 40% Get Into the Real Rockies 30% Real Rocky. Real Good Times. 24% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Gateway to Rocky Mountain National Park received the most support of all slogans (by a large margin).

V I S I T O R S E L E C T I O N P R O C E S S M O S T I M P O R TA N T I N F O R M AT I O N S O U R C E Recommendation from a friend / colleague 34% Other 27% Rocky Mountain National Park information 14% Estes Park website(s) 10% Information provided by lodging property 6% Official Visitors Guide 3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% When asked to select the most important information source used in their decision to visit Estes Park, recommendations from friends/colleagues were most frequently identified by respondents. Day Visitors were significantly more likely than Overnight Visitors to rate recommendations as the most important information source.

V I S I T O R S E L E C T I O N P R O C E S S O T H E R D E S T I N AT I O N S C O N S I D E R E D 9% 23% None 67% Other Colorado Destinations Other Two-thirds of all survey respondents did not consider any other destination before deciding to visit Estes Park, while nearly one-quarter of respondents considered other Colorado destinations. Other Colorado destinations most frequently considered included Colorado Springs, Denver, Breckenridge and Boulder.

V I S I T O R S P E N D I N G D AY A N D O V E R N I G H T V I S I T O R S Visitor Spending Day Visitors Overnight Visitors Spring $89 $623 Summer $102 $860 Fall $83 $693 Winter 2011 $91 $673 Day Visitor spending seasonally ranged from $83 - $102 Overnight Visitor spending seasonally ranged from $623 - $860 Both Day and Overnight spending was highest during the Summer Season Overnight Visitors spent roughly eight times what Day Visitors spent throughout the year that was studied

V I S I T O R S P E N D I N G O V E R N I G H T V I S I T O R S P E N D I N G B Y S TAT E $1,200 $1,128 $1,119 $1,000 $800 $928 $855 $851 $800 $766 $600 $508 $400 $200 $0 Colorado; N=1,469 Texas; N=330 Illinois; N=142 Missouri; N=179 California; N=118 Iowa; N=138 Kansas; N=232 Nebraska; N=231 Colorado Overnight Visitors: Spent less, though high volume Stayed fewer nights (average of 2 nights)

E S T E S P A R K V I S I T O R S S T U D Y C O N D U C T E D B Y : 8490 E. Crescent Parkway, Suite 365 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 303.488.9808 www.guestresearch.com