WORKSHOP BRIEFING DOCUMENT: Comprehensive Water and Wastewater Rate and Charge Study

Similar documents
ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE To Be Entitled:

COMPREHENSIVE COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN ANALYSIS

Water Conservation Rates. January 26, 2010

YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA

The series 2008 Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds Feasibility Report recommended the City perform and implement a rate study for the following reasons:

DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN ANALYSIS. San Antonio Water System. San Antonio Water System 21 MAY 2015 PREPARED FOR

Water Rates DETERMINING THE REAL COST OF POTABLE WATER

WATER, WASTEWATER, AND RECLAIMED WATER RATE STUDY Public Meeting to Review Study Results. January 5, 2016

WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY

City of Cocoa FY 2010 Utility Rate Study. Final Report. Water, Sewer & Reclaimed Water Rates, Fees & Charges Study. Prepared by:

CITY OF CITY OF SONOMA FULLERTON. Pricing Objectives Discussion Water Rate Study 2018 Water Rate Study

SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM (SAWS) RATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: MEETING 3

FORT COLLINS- LOVELAND WATER DISTRICT

Study Workshops are designed to be both educational and to seek broad direction from the Board

Temescal Valley Water District

CITY OF HEALDSBURG RESOLUTION NO

WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES RATE STUDY

Presentation of Results Water and Sewer Rate Study Trophy Club MUD No. 1. A Division of NewGen Strategies & Solutions, LLC

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY

City of Napa Modification of Water Rates. September, City of Napa Water Rates. Service Area. >75,000 customers. 25,000 connections

RATE CASE OVERVIEW J U N E Application for a limited proceeding water and wastewater rate increase in Polk County by

Florida Public Service Commission RATE CASE OVERVIEW

2016 Water and Recycled Water Rate Study WEBINAR WITH DISTRICT STAFF JUNE 29, 2016

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission

Florida Public Service Commission SPECIAL REPORT

Glacial Lakes Sanitary Sewer & Water District Utility Rate Study. Shelly Eldridge Ehlers Jeanne Vogt - Ehlers

Town of Hillsborough. City Council Public Hearing. Water Rate Cost-of-Service Study. February 13, 2017

MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT FINANCIAL PLAN AND RATE AND FEE STUDY FINAL REPORT. September 2013

July 1, Tier Percent of Allocation Cost per ccf $0.91 $1.27 $2.86 $4.80 $ % % % % 201+%

MONROE CITY COUNCIL. Agenda Bill No

2017 UTILITY RATE STUDY WORK SESSION #2: BACKGROUND, EDUCATIONAL/INFORMATIONAL

Jefferson County PUD. Rate Hearing November 10, 2016

Squaw Valley PSD. Water & Sewer Rate and Connection Fee Study. Presented by: Shawn Koorn Associate Vice President HDR Engineering, Inc.

Water Services Rate Study

The City of Sierra Madre

CITY OF REDLANDS WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY. Prepared by:

Water and Sewer Rate Study

WATER USER RATES & FEE STUDY

From: Lex Warmath and Elaine Conti, Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc.

La Cañada Irrigation District

Water Rates Rate Restructure and Rate Adjustments

SECTION G. RATES AND SERVICE FEES

COMPREHENSIVE WATER AND SEWER RATE AND FEE STUDY VILLAGE OF ALGONQUIN

WATER UTILITY FINANCIAL PLAN AND RATE STUDY CITY OF WHITEFISH, MT MARCH 2016

Town of Orange Park Water & Wastewater Rate Study. Town Council Meeting. March 19, 2019

Council Bill No WATER RATES General Ordinance 6318 Sheet No. 3 (Page 1 of 6)

Comprehensive Water Rate Study

05/19/2015 Regular BoCC Meeting Minutes

BOARD MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, :00 PM - 4:00 PM COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBERS

Water and Sewer Rate Study Trophy Club MUD No. 1. A Division of NewGen Strategies & Solutions, LLC

TOWN OF PRESCOTT VALLEY

CHAPTER XI. WATER & SEWER ARTICLE A. WATER CONNECTION FEES. New Water Connection Fees. Inside City Limits

LONG BEACH WATER DEPARTMENT COST OF SERVICE AND RATE STUDY

CITRUS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 AND 2014

FY 2019 Approved Budget Approved by the Board of Directors on March 1, 2018

NALDRAFT SEPTEMBER2015 WASTEWATE

M54. Developing Rates for Small Systems. Second Edition. Copyright 2016 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY WATER UTILITY COMMISSION WATER RATES ANALYSIS REPORT OCTOBER 7, 2009

2017 WATER, RECYCLED WATER, AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY REPORT

BC HYDRO S RATE DESIGN APPLICATION FARM AND IRRIGATION CUSTOMER ISSUES. Presentation to the BC Cranberry Marketing Commission (BCCMC) June 15, 2015

Schedule of Water and Sewer Rates of First Utility District of Knox County, Tennessee. Residential Water

Utility Rates. October 13, 2015

City of Snoqualmie. Water, Sewer and Storm Utilities Rate Study Update. Council Meeting. January 23, Sergey Tarasov, Project Manager

Florida Public Service Commission RATE CASE OVERVIEW

Rates and Fees for New Connections (Developer Fees)

Santa Clarita Water Division

Cedar River Water and Sewer District FEE AND CHARGE SCHEDULE AMENDED January 21, 2014

Rate Schedule. Fiscal Year-2018 (July 1, 2017 June 30, 2018) P.O. Box 5911 Virginia Beach, Virginia

City of Fridley Water and Sewer Rate Study. Jessica Cook 9/25/17

CITY OF CALISTOGA WATER RATE STUDY FINAL REPORT

UTILITY RATE STUDY. Public Hearing

Final Report COMPREHENSIVE WATER AND WASTEWATER COST OF SERVICE AND RATE STUDY

Schedule of Water and Sewer Rates of First Utility District of Knox County, Tennessee. Residential Water

JIu.blitc:$~ a:t~ug 24 AM II: 05 CAPITAL CIRCLE OFFICE CENTER SHUMARD OAK BOULEV~'1 ~'11 S S!0 N TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA C L E R K

SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA ANNUAL REPORT TO BONDHOLDERS

1. Approval of Minutes Approval. 2. Public Comments None. 5. Government & Community Relations / Erin Killebrew (a) Brand Management

Final Report Water and Sewer Rate Model Town of Denton, MD

Water Consultancy. Montecito Sanitary District Wastewater Rate Study Report. Montecito Sanitary District

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED NEW/INCREASED WATER RATES

MONROE CITY COUNCIL. Agenda Bill No

Final COST OF SERVICE STUDY SEPTEMBER City of San Clemente

Capital Finance Overview: Dealing with the New Normal

Valencia Water Company. Cost of Service Study

Sewer Rate Study CRESCENT CITY CALIFORNIA

WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER, AND MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY

Sewer Master Plan BCC Workshop November 15, 2016

Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District, ID No. 1. Water Rates & Finances. December 13, 2016

SPECIAL REPORT FEBRUARY Application for staff-assisted rate case in Lee County by. Useppa Island Utilities Co., Inc. DOCKET NO.

Water & Sewer Rate Study. Water & Sewer Cost of Service Rate Study. City of Norco, CA. Draft Report for

Regional Raw Water System of Broward County, Florida

The Utilities Fund is broken into two categories: a Capacity Expansion Fund and an Operating Fund.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY

CITY OF AUBURNDALE, FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

Sewer Rates. General Information Sheet. July 18, 2017

RESOLUTION CONNECTION CHARGES, PLANT INVESTMENT FEES, AND UTILITY RATES FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICE

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY

Rate Schedule. Fiscal Year-2015 (July 1, 2014 June 30, 2015) Amended July 22, 2014 Amended August 26, 2014

2016 Water and Recycled Water Rate Study PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 12, 2016

CITY OF TITUSVILLE ORDINANCE. Sec Schedule of water and sewer charges

CAPITAL RECOVERY POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS

Transcription:

WORKSHOP BRIEFING DOCUMENT: Comprehensive Water and Wastewater Rate and Charge Study July 31, 2007 HCD/GAI# A070574.01

Purpose of Rate Study Provide For Revenue Sufficiency Charge Customers Based On Costs Of Services (Rate Parity) Continue to Promote Resource Conservation Provide for the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Retain Administrative Compatibility Public Understandability 2

Elements of Rate Making Fiscal Requirements Rate Revenues Other Sources of Income Customer Characteristics Future Needs (CIP) Community Standards Compliance with Florida Statutes 3

What was Done? Fiscal Requirements/Operating Analysis Capital Improvement Analysis Capital Structure and Debt Coverage Analysis Other Fiscal Needs and Revenue Analysis Developed Interactive Computer Model 4

Fiscal Requirements Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Expenses Debt Service and Coverage Requirements Renewal & Replacement, Reserve Funds, and Transfers Pay-as-you-go Capital 5

Rate Revenue Requirements Total Fiscal Requirements Less Other Income & Sources Equals Net Rate Revenue Requirements 6

Rate Revenue Requirements Adjusted Test Year 2007/08 Description Water Wastewater Combined O&M Expenses $ 2,120,999 $ 1,723,824 $ 3,844,823 Debt Service 638,573 887,024 1,525,598 Capital From Rates 264,700 304,339 569,039 Other Expenses/Transfers 670,658 71,119 741,777 Other Operating Revenues (316,000) (74,740) (390,740) Net Rate Revenue Requirements $ 3,378,930 $ 2,911,566 $ 6,290,496 7

Rate Revenue Requirements $741,777, 10% $(390,740), 6% $569,039, 8% $3,844,823, 54% $1,525,598, 22% 8 O&M Expenses Debt Service Capital From Rates Other Expenses/Transfers Other Operating Revenues

Existing Rate Structure Water Flat Base Charge per Month per Account. Up to 4,000 Gallons of Usage included in the Base Charge. Inclining Block Rate Structure with 10 Usage Blocks. 9

Existing Rate Structure Wastewater Commercial and Units Base Charge based on Meter Size. Residential Base Charge is flat rate per Residential Account. 2 Block Rate Structure: Block 1: 0 7,000 gallons Block 2: >7,000 gallons Cap on Residential Billed Flow at 15,000 gallons per month. 10

Rate Structure Modifications Modify the Base Charge to not include any gallonage. Base Charge to be Billed based on Meter Size for Residential and Commercial Customers Utilizing Meter Equivalencies Established by the AWWA. Multi-Unit Base Charge to be Billed Based on Dwelling Units per Account. Multi-Family Equivalencies to be set at 0.8 ERUs per Unit 11

Rate Structure Modifications Implement a Lifeline Rate. This rate will be used to help low income individuals with their Bill. Individuals will have to qualify for this rate through entities such as the Lake Wales Care Center. Modify Potable Water and Wastewater Blocks and Charge Differentials (incremental factors) Between Blocks 12

Rate Structure Modifications American Water Works Association (AWWA) recommends the following meter equivalencies: 13 Meter Size ERC Factor 5/8 x 3/4" 1.00 1.0 2.50 1.5 5.00 2.0 8.00 3.0 16.00 4.0 25.00 6.0 50.00

Rate Structure Modifications Existing (Per Account) Proposed (Per ERU) Gallons (000s) Incremental Gallons (000s) Incremental WATER Block 1 Included in Base Included in Base 0-5 1.00 Block 2 4-10 1.00 5-10 1.35 Block 3 10-15 1.12 10-25 2.09 Block 4 15-25 1.23 Above 25 3.45 Block 5 25-35 1.35 Block 6 35-50 1.49 Block 7 50-65 1.63 Block 8 65-80 1.77 Block 9 80-100 1.93 Block 10 Above 100 2.12 WASTEWATER Block 1 0-7 1.00 0-5 1.00 Block 2 Above 7 1.50 Above 5 1.75 14

Proposed Rates - Water Rate Component Inside City Outside City Base Charge: Residential (Per ERU) $ 4.95 $ 6.19 Multi-Family (Per Dwelling Unit) $ 3.96 $ 4.95 Commercial (Per ERU) $ 4.95 $ 6.19 Irrigation (Per ERU) $ 4.95 $ 6.19 Gallonage Charge: Block 1 $ 1.96 $ 2.45 Block 2 $ 2.65 $ 3.32 Block 3 $ 4.11 $ 5.14 Block 4 $ 6.77 $ 8.47 15

Proposed Rates - Wastewater Rate Component Inside City Outside City Base Charge: Residential (Per ERU) $ 17.59 $ 21.99 Multi-Family (Per Dwelling Unit) $ 14.08 $ 17.60 Commercial (Per ERU) $ 17.59 $ 21.99 Gallonage Charge: (1) Block 1 $ 2.31 $ 2.89 Block 2 $ 4.05 $ 5.07 Note (1): Residential Billed Flows capped at 15,000 gallons per month per ERU and Multi-Family Billed Flows capped at 12,000 gallons per month per Dwelling Unit) 16

Monthly Bill Comparison - Residential Difference Customers at Total Customers Using Amount or Meter Size Gallonage Existing Proposed Amount Percent Gallonage Less 0.75" 0 $ 32.12 $ 22.54 $ (9.58) -29.83% 11.49% 11.70% 0.75" 1,000 $ 33.31 $ 26.81 $ (6.50) -19.51% 6.87% 18.36% 0.75" 2,000 $ 34.50 $ 31.08 $ (3.42) -9.91% 9.31% 27.66% 0.75" 3,000 $ 35.69 $ 35.35 $ (0.34) -0.95% 9.94% 37.60% 0.75" 4,000 $ 36.88 $ 39.62 $ 2.74 7.43% 9.57% 47.17% 0.75" 5,000 $ 40.21 $ 43.89 $ 3.68 9.15% 8.32% 55.49% 0.75" 6,000 $ 43.54 $ 50.59 $ 7.05 16.19% 7.13% 62.61% 0.75" 7,000 $ 46.87 $ 57.29 $ 10.42 22.23% 5.89% 68.50% 0.75" 8,000 $ 50.78 $ 63.99 $ 13.21 26.01% 4.88% 73.38% 0.75" 9,000 $ 54.69 $ 70.69 $ 16.00 29.26% 4.08% 77.45% 0.75" 10,000 $ 58.60 $ 77.39 $ 18.79 32.06% 3.42% 80.87% 0.75" 15,000 $ 79.40 $ 118.19 $ 38.79 48.85% 1.15% 90.08% 0.75" 20,000 $ 92.60 $ 138.74 $ 46.14 49.83% 0.59% 94.22% 0.75" 25,000 $ 105.80 $ 159.29 $ 53.49 50.56% 0.33% 96.40% 0.75" 30,000 $ 120.25 $ 193.14 $ 72.89 60.62% 0.20% 97.66% 0.75" 40,000 $ 150.65 $ 260.84 $ 110.19 73.14% 0.07% 98.89% 0.75" 50,000 $ 182.55 $ 328.54 $ 145.99 79.97% 0.04% 99.37% 17

Monthly Bill Comparison - Multi-Family Total Difference Gallonage Units Gallonage Existing Proposed Amount Percent Per Unit Bill Per Unit 2 2,000 $ 34.50 $ 44.62 $ 10.12 29.33% 1,000 $ 22.31 2 4,000 $ 36.88 $ 50.19 $ 13.31 36.09% 2,000 $ 25.10 2 6,000 $ 43.54 $ 58.73 $ 15.19 34.89% 3,000 $ 29.37 2 8,000 $ 50.78 $ 67.27 $ 16.49 32.47% 4,000 $ 33.64 2 10,000 $ 58.60 $ 80.67 $ 22.07 37.66% 5,000 $ 40.34 2 12,000 $ 66.92 $ 94.07 $ 27.15 40.57% 6,000 $ 47.04 2 14,000 $ 80.27 $ 107.47 $ 27.20 33.89% 7,000 $ 53.74 2 16,000 $ 89.09 $ 120.87 $ 31.78 35.67% 8,000 $ 60.44 2 20,000 $ 97.91 $ 153.51 $ 55.60 56.79% 10,000 $ 76.76 4 12,000 $ 66.92 $ 123.40 $ 56.48 84.40% 3,000 $ 30.85 4 30,000 $ 187.86 $ 234.28 $ 46.42 24.71% 7,500 $ 58.57 7 22,000 $ 151.33 $ 220.22 $ 68.89 45.52% 3,143 $ 31.46 9 60,000 $ 338.16 $ 476.88 $ 138.72 41.02% 6,667 $ 52.99 40 95,000 $ 663.35 $ 1,127.25 $ 463.90 69.93% 2,375 $ 28.18 56 133,000 $ 901.13 $ 1,578.15 $ 677.02 75.13% 2,375 $ 28.18 18

Monthly Bill Comparison - Multi-Family Existing Rates Proposed Rates Units Total Gallonage Gallons per Unit Single Family Multi- Family Per Unit % of Single Family Single Family Multi- Family Per Unit % of Single Family 2 2,000 1,000 $ 33.31 $ 17.25 52% $ 26.81 $ 22.31 83% 2 4,000 2,000 $ 34.50 $ 18.44 53% $ 31.08 $ 25.10 81% 2 6,000 3,000 $ 35.69 $ 21.77 61% $ 35.35 $ 29.37 83% 2 8,000 4,000 $ 36.88 $ 25.39 69% $ 39.62 $ 33.64 85% 2 10,000 5,000 $ 40.21 $ 29.30 73% $ 43.89 $ 40.34 92% 2 12,000 6,000 $ 43.54 $ 33.46 77% $ 50.59 $ 47.04 93% 2 14,000 7,000 $ 46.87 $ 40.14 86% $ 57.29 $ 53.74 94% 2 16,000 8,000 $ 50.78 $ 44.55 88% $ 63.99 $ 60.44 94% 2 20,000 10,000 $ 58.60 $ 48.96 84% $ 77.39 $ 76.76 99% 4 12,000 3,000 $ 35.69 $ 16.73 47% $ 35.35 $ 30.85 87% 4 30,000 7,500 $ 50.78 $ 46.97 92% $ 63.99 $ 58.57 92% 7 22,000 3,143 $ 35.69 $ 21.62 61% $ 35.35 $ 31.46 89% 9 60,000 6,667 $ 46.87 $ 37.57 80% $ 57.29 $ 52.99 92% 40 95,000 2,375 $ 34.50 $ 16.58 48% $ 31.08 $ 28.18 91% 56 133,000 2,375 $ 34.50 $ 16.09 47% $ 31.08 $ 28.18 91% 19

Monthly Bill Comparison - Commercial Difference Meter Size Gallonage Existing Proposed Amount Percent 0.75" 6,000 $ 43.54 $ 50.59 $ 7.05 16.19% 0.75" 20,000 $ 101.45 $ 158.99 $ 57.54 56.72% 0.75" 75,000 $ 379.00 $ 740.79 $ 361.79 95.46% 1.50" 65,000 $ 421.31 $ 488.80 $ 67.49 16.02% 1.50" 90,000 $ 563.81 $ 713.35 $ 149.54 26.52% 1.50" 150,000 $ 938.41 $ 1,269.45 $ 331.04 35.28% 2.00" 120,000 $ 819.10 $ 930.67 $ 111.57 13.62% 2.00" 200,000 $ 1,323.90 $ 1,583.47 $ 259.57 19.61% 2.00" 300,000 $ 1,954.90 $ 2,665.47 $ 710.57 36.35% 20

Comparison With Other Utilities Typical Residential Single-Family Service Monthly Usage (in gallons) 5,000 8,000 15,000 Existing $ 40.21 $ 50.78 $ 79.40 Proposed $ 43.89 $ 63.99 $ 118.19 21 Other Utilities - Existing Auburndale $ 37.31 $ 40.51 $ 51.71 Bartow 44.72 56.26 82.23 Davenport 33.97 46.06 58.92 Dundee 71.75 74.60 86.00 Eagle Lake 38.58 53.70 91.19 Fort Meade 32.20 40.18 58.80 Frost Proof 66.53 86.03 151.03 Haines City 41.73 55.02 69.63 Lake Alfred 53.49 55.49 62.49 Lakeland 36.52 48.47 72.15 Mulberry 51.27 64.87 100.22 Polk City 51.27 56.40 94.73 Polk County 61.05 72.56 89.84 Winter Haven 38.94 57.57 101.84 Average of Other Utilities $ 47.10 $ 57.69 $ 83.63

Findings and Conclusions Existing Level of User Rates are Insufficient to Provide for the Fiscal Requirements as Budgeted and Forecasted. Reductions or Postponement of Budgeted and Forecasted Fiscal Requirements can Diminish the Ability to Provide for the Health, Safety, Welfare, and Economic Development of the Community. 22

Proposed Rate Structure Will generate sufficient revenues to meet fiscal requirements. Provides for an Equitable Allocation of costs between and among user classes. Is suitable for future operating, debt service, renewal & replacement, and other needs. Is manageable for existing billing system. Continues to encourage conservation. 23

What s Next City Implements the Proposed Rate Structure Adjustments and Modifications Customers Have Been Notified per 180.136 F.S. Public Hearing Scheduled for August 7, 2007 City should Continue the Practice of Automatic Annual Indexing of Rates to Help Address the Affects of Inflation. 24