COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Similar documents
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

competitiontribunal 6- f,i~ COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Primary Target Firm REASONS FOR DECISION

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No.: 69/LM/Sep04. Reasons for Decision

...,,..,~,~- competitiontrlbunal COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Riversdale Mining Ltd

Reasons for Decision

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Santam Ltd & Kagiso Newco Acquiring Firm And. Reasons for Decision

Public Reasons for Decision

Reasons for Decision

PRIMETIME TRADING 6 (PTY)LTD Acquiring Firm TOURISM INVESTMENT CORPORATION LIMITED. : N Manoim (Presiding Member), Y Carrim (Tribunal Member), and

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: 65/LM/Nov01

Umcebo Mining (Pty) Ltd Mopani Coal (Pty) Ltd

Umcebo Mining (Pty) Ltd Firms Mopani Coal (Pty) Ltd

V&A Waterfront Properties Ltd, V&A Waterfront Marina (Pty) Ltd And Victoria & Alfred Waterfront (Pty) Ltd. Reasons for Decision

Competition Issues in Aftermarkets - Note from South Africa

Andreas Wessels (Tribunal Member), and Andiswa Ndoni (Tribunal Member)

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Statement on the decisions of the Competition Commission. Competition Commission launches an investigation against Transnet

Today Frozen Foods (a business unit of Pioneer Foods (Pty) Ltd) ; John West (a division of Heinz SA (Pty) Ltd) and Heinz Wellington (Pty) Ltd

Statement on the decisions of the Competition Commission. To: All Media Date: 21 January 2016

SA automotive industry

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

competftlontrlbunal 16 frl' COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

: N Manoim (Presiding Member); M Holden (Tribunal Member) and Y Carrim (Tribunal Member) Reasons

Case M PEUGEOT / BNP PARIBAS / OPEL VAUXHALL FINCOS

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA SUNSET BAY TRADING 368 (PTY) LTD JOBLING INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD. Reasons for Decision

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA. In the matter between: Old Mutual Life Assurance Company (South Africa) Limited

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA. LGM South Africa Facilities Managers and Engineers (Pty) Ltd

Reasons for Decision

LATEST DECISIONS BY THE COMPETITION COMMISSION

: D Lewis (Presiding Member); Y Carrim (Tribunal Member) and N Manoim (Tribunal Member) Reasons for Decision

VAT 420 Guide for Motor Dealers FOREWORD

: D Lewis (Presiding Member), N Manoim (Tribunal Member), and REASONS FOR DECISION

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case no.: 32/LM/Jun03. Liberty Group Limited. Reasons for Decision

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

compotltiontrlbunal,,, r,f#'hll COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE REPORTS RECORD RESULTS. Most Profitable Quarter in Company History

Most Profitable Quarter in Company History

Alternative motor glass offering - Questions & Answers -

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Dealer Guide Tire & Wheel Limited Warranty

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/008 - DAIMLER / MYTAXI

2016 Results. 28 February Analyst Briefing

Snap-on to Acquire ProQuest Business Solutions. Snap-on Announces 2006 Third-quarter Results. Accelerates Snap-on s Profitable Growth Strategy.

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA. Stefanutti & Bressan Holdings Limited

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA. Capitau Investments Management Limited. New Foodcorp Holdings Pty Ltd

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Statement on the decisions of the Competition Commission. Proposed merger between Johnson Controls Inc (JCI) and Tyco International Plc (Tyco)

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA. Sherewa Investments (Pty) Ltd

customers say they definitely will use the lender again and 23 percent say they definitely will recommend the lender.

Pre-Merger Notification South Africa

IN THE TAX COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT CAPE TOWN)

1. Background and introductory comment

Leith Automotive Group Wholesale Parts Network 4800 Capital Blvd Raleigh, NC 27616

Financial Results H1/2013

Liquidity and Capital Resources.

COMMITMENT OF THE ALLIANCE OF AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS, INC. AND THE ASSOCIATION OF GLOBAL AUTOMAKERS, INC.

Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG-NYSE)

Marshall Motor Holdings plc 2017 Full year results presentation March 2018

Case No COMP/M MAPFRE / SALVADOR CAETANO / JV'S. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/04/2009

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/030 - AVANTCARD/TESCO BANK

Vehicle & Equipment Finance

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT. SMK123 Formative assessment3.indd 1. Unit Standard:

Winning Strategies. Julien Deleuze Senior Manager, Estin & Co

FY st Quarter Financial Results ended June 30, July 28, 2017 DENSO CORPORATION

FY2018 1st Quarter Financial Results ended June 31, July 28, 2017 DENSO CORPORATION

# E: Warranty Administration - GM Dealer Empowerment Program and Goodwill Procedures - (Feb 9, 2015)

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Crusade ABS Series Trust Collateral Pool Data

Case No IV/M ARVIN / SOGEFI. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

Swapalease.com Auto Lease Trends Report 2nd Quarter A snapshot of the auto lease industry

Recover the Lost Market Value of Your Vehicle After an Accident

A P Moller Maersk Acquiring Firm And. Reasons for Decision

KAP INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LIMITED UNAUDITED RESULTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2018

Crusade ABS Series Trust Collateral Pool Data

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Private vehicle expenses 2018 The costs of owning a car

Q2 operating income of $2.6 billion, down $0.4 billion Y-O-Y. H1 operating income of $5.5 billion, up $0.5 billion Y-O-Y.

PROPOSED DISPOSAL OF WBL S AUTOMOTIVE DIVISION

DETERMINATION OF MERGER NOTIFICATION M/18/047 CUBE TRANSPORTATION (ISQ)/TIP HOLDINGS

AUTOCANADA REPORTS 2018 FIRST QUARTER RESULTS

ARBITRATION CERTIFICATION PROGRAM 1625 North Market Blvd., Suite N112, Sacramento, CA P (916) F (916)

Weekly Media Statement For immediate release 27 November 2017 LATEST DECISIONS BY THE COMPETITION COMMISSION

For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015

Chief Counsel Advice on the Acceleration of a 481(a) Adjustment

How Vehicle Information Informs Credit Risk Measures. Tony Hughes, Managing Director Michael Vogan, Asst. Director April 17, 2018

Acquisition of Musa Motors, Russia. 24 th April 2008

GAP Insurance for New and Used Cars in Europe

Dealer Guide Limited Warranty

CFAO at a glance. Presentation

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The study finds that preferred relationships are not exclusive to the captive lenders.

Financial Results H1/ July 2014

ASG Macquarie Conference Presentation. May 2018

Transcription:

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: 86/LM/Sep12 015636 In the matter between: Unitrans Automotive (Pty) Ltd Acquiring Firm And Reeds Motor Group (Pty) Ltd Reeds Motors Tableview (Pty) Ltd Target Firms Panel : Andreas Wessels (Presiding Member) Takalani Madima (Tribunal Member) Medi Mokuena (Tribunal Member) Heard on : 17 October 2012 Order issued on : 17 October 2012 Reasons issued on : 29 October 2012 Reasons for Decision Approval [1] On 17 October 2012 the Competition Tribunal ( Tribunal ) approved the merger between Unitrans Automotive (Pty) Ltd ( Unitrans ), the primary acquiring firm, and Reeds Motor Group (Pty) Ltd ( RMG ) and Reeds Motors Tableview (Pty) Ltd ( RM Tableview ), the primary target firms. [2] The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow below. 1

Parties to transaction [3] The primary acquiring firm is Unitrans, a company incorporated in accordance with the company laws of the Republic of South Africa. Unitrans is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the JD Group Limited. [4] Of relevance to the competition assessment of this transaction is that Unitrans sells new and pre-owned light commercial and passenger vehicles, parts and accessories and further provides related aftermarket services. It represents a number of international motoring brands such as Toyota/Lexus, General Motors South Africa ( GMSA ), Volkswagen, Audi, Nissan, Renault, Mercedes-Benz, BMW and MAN. It services its customers from a network of 81 dealerships located throughout South Africa. With regards to the geographic area of overlap with the target firms, Unitrans operates seven dealerships in the Western Cape. [5] The primary target firms are RMG and RM Tableview. Both these firms are private companies incorporated in accordance with the company laws of the Republic of South Africa. RMG is ultimately controlled by Zizap Investments (Pty) Ltd ( Zizap ), which holds 80% of the shares therein. RMG has the following interests: (i) RM Tableview (70%); (ii) Reeds Car Rental (Pty) Ltd (100%); and (iii) Reeds Contract Car Rental (Pty) Ltd (70%). [6] The target firms sell new and pre-owned light commercial and passenger vehicles, parts, accessories and provide aftermarket services within the GMSA stable, which includes Opel and Chevrolet passenger cars, Opel half ton bakkies, Isuzu LDV s and Isuzu trucks. RMG also sells a selection of used and demonstration vehicles. It operates three full dealerships (inclusive of workshops) and one boutique dealership that does not have a workshop. These dealerships are located in the Western Cape, namely Reeds N1 City, Tygervalley, Reeds Cape Town and Reeds Tableview (trading as Isuzu Truck Centre). 2

Proposed transaction and rationale [7] According to the merging parties the proposed transaction envisages the acquisition of (i) a business which includes motor vehicle dealerships that include workshops, and a boutique vehicle dealership, conducted by RMG and its subsidiaries, Reeds Car Rental (Pty) Ltd and Reeds Contract Car Rental (Pty) Ltd (also see paragraph 5 above); and (ii) 70% 1 of the total issued shares in RM Tableview. [8] According to Unitrans the proposed acquisition will compliment the Unitrans business model and strategy and afford it more of a presence in the Western Cape. [9] From the target firms perspective, the main motivation for the transaction is to enable the shareholders of Zizap to realise their investments in the businesses. In addition, the major shareholder of Zizap is nearing retirement and therefore wishes to exit the vehicle dealership market. Relevant markets and impact on competition [10] There is a horizontal overlap in the activities of the merging parties in respect of the sale of new and pre-owned light commercial and passenger vehicles, as well as the sale of spare parts and the provision of maintenance and repair services. Geographically these activities overlap in the broader Western Cape area and, more specifically, in the Cape Town/Bellville area. There is, however, no need for us in this case to take a definitive view on the exact parameters of the relevant product and geographic markets since this does not alter our ultimate conclusion with regards to the competitive effect of this transaction. [11] According to the Commission s assessment the merged entity will have a post-merger market share of below 20% in the Western Cape in respect of each of the following markets: the sale of (i) new light commercial 1 According to the merging parties the balance of the shares in RM Tableview will be retained by the current shareholder, Melanie Jacobs, in keeping with the firm s black economic empowerment strategy. 3

vehicles; (ii) new small passenger cars; (iii) new medium passenger cars; (iv) new multipurpose passenger vehicles; and (v) new sport utility cars. [12] Furthermore, the Tribunal at the hearing requested the merging parties to submit a list of motor vehicle dealerships in the (narrower) Cape Town/Bellville geographic area. The merging parties subsequently submitted this information 2 and we were satisfied that the merged entity, from a narrow geographic market perspective, faces sufficient competition post-merger. [13] With regards to the sale of pre-owned vehicles and after sale service, the Commission found that no likely competition concerns arise as a result of the proposed transaction given the existence of sufficient competition to the merged entity. We have no reason to doubt this finding. [14] We therefore conclude that that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Public interest [15] The merging parties confirmed that there will be no job losses or retrenchments as a result of the proposed transaction. 3 No other public interest issues arise as a result of this transaction. CONCLUSION [16] We approve the proposed merger unconditionally. 29 October 2012 Andreas Wessels DATE Takalani Madima and Medi Mokuena concurring 2 See the merging parties additional submission dated 17 October 2012 following the Tribunal s request. 3 See merger record pages 7, 36 and 62. 4

Tribunal researcher: For the merging parties: For the Commission: Caroline Sserufusa Andile Nikani of Fluxmans Attorneys Zanele Hadebe 5