INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

Similar documents
Re Toh. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)

2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) in the conduct of Shaun Wayne Howell.

IN THE MATTER OF THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: KELLY JOHN CAMPBELL HUSKY

Re Mackie & Leadbeater

ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation (the Investigation ) into the conduct of the Respondent.

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) in the Respondent s conduct.

Re Mendelman REASONS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF SETTLEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Re Elue. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ( IIROC ) 2014 IIROC 39

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Re Klemke. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) in the conduct of Gerald Stefaniuk.

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Re Dunn & Wimble. The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) Thomas William Dunn and Gordon Joseph Wimble

2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) in the conduct of Samuel Kloda.

Re Industrial Alliance Securities

2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation (the Investigation ) into Cole s conduct.

Re Richardson. The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada

Decision on Settlement Agreement

Re: ROBERT SCOTT RITCHIE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT DECISION

2. IIROC s Enforcement Department has conducted an investigation into Mackie s conduct (the Investigation ).

2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) into the conduct of Ford.

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION

2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) into the conduct of McLaughlin and McManus.

Re IPC Securities REASONS FOR DECISION

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

Re Smith. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)

Re Assante Capital Management REASONS FOR DECISION

RE: ROCHE SECURITIES LIMITED and FRANCIS ROCHE

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION

Re Clarke. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada 2016 IIROC 12

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

2. IIROC s Enforcement Department has conducted an investigation (the Investigation ) into the Respondents conduct.

Re Dariotis and Fiumidinisi

Re Lewis. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) 2016 IIROC 01

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: STEVEN RODNEY JESKE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Re Laurentian Bank Securities

Re Kloda DECISION ON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Re Bateman. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada 2014 IIROC 38

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

THE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING

NOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

Re Watts DECISION AND REASONS

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

Re Milot. The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada. The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada

THE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING

ON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:

NOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION

JAMES ALEXANDER MOON, MICHAEL EDWARD COMEAU AND MITCHELL TORCH

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION

Re National Bank Direct Brokerage Inc. Decision

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PART I INTRODUCTION

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of the Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:

Self-Regulatory Standards and Enforcement Practices

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: ESTHER INGLIS DECISION AND REASONS

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: MANAS DICHOW SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Re Nieswandt REASONS FOR DECISION

ON BEHALF OF. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of IIROC s Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:

Re Pan. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)

Re Savard. The Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada. The By-Laws of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA STATEMENT OF ALLEGATIONS

THE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING

Discipline Penalties Imposed on Michael Joseph Puccini; Violations of By-laws 29.1 and 19.5

August 18, IN THE MATTER OF THE TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE INC. AND ROGER BRIAN ASHTON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING

NOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

2011 BCSECCOM 197. Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada Tony Tung-Yuan Lin. Section 28 of the Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c.

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED -AND- IN THE MATTER OF MARK STEVEN ROTSTEIN AND EQUILIBRIUM PARTNERS INC.

INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada

Re Byron Capital Markets & Becher

NOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE DEALER MEMBER RULES OF THE HENRY COLE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA RE: GUS ANASTASIO DIMAS

RE: WARREN J. McCAFFREY NOTICE OF HEARING

TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to Rule 6.2 of the Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, that the hearing shall be designated on the:

Re Bergeron. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)

THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

NOTICE OF HEARING INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 6.2 of the Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure, the hearing shall be designated on the:

Re Moon et al REASONS FOR DECISION

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA NOTICE OF HEARING IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA

Re Silvaggio 2011 IIROC 63. Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada Hearing Panel (Québec District Council)

Re Jones. The Dealer Member Rules of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC)

Re Credit Suisse Securities (Canada) Inc

Transcription:

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA (IDA) AND TODD STEFIUK SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION 1. IIROC Enforcement Staff and the Respondent, Todd Stefiuk, consent and agree to the settlement of this matter by way of this settlement agreement ( the Settlement Agreement ). 2. The Enforcement Department of IIROC has conducted an investigation ( the Investigation ) into the conduct of Todd Stefiuk. 3. On June 1, 2008, IIROC consolidated the regulatory and enforcement functions of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and Market Regulation Services Inc. Pursuant to the Administrative and Regulatory Services Agreement between IDA and IIROC, effective June 1, 2008, the IDA has retained IIROC to provide services for IDA to carry out its regulatory functions. 4. The Respondent consents to be subject to the jurisdiction of IIROC. 5. The Investigation discloses matters for which the Respondent may be disciplined by a hearing panel appointed pursuant to IIROC Transitional Rule No.1, Schedule C.1, Part C ( the Hearing Panel ).

- 2 - II. JOINT SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDATION 6. Staff and the Respondent jointly recommend that the Hearing Panel accept this Settlement Agreement. 7. The Respondent admits to the following contraventions of IIROC Rules, Guidelines, IDA By-Laws, Regulations or Policies: a) Between approximately March, 2006 and October, 2008, the Respondent failed to disclose outside business activities in approximately eight corporations to his member firm and thereby engaged in conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest, contrary to IIROC Dealer Member Rule 29.1; and b) Between approximately December, 2006 and May, 2007, the Respondent facilitated and participated in the purchase and sale of securities on behalf of forty two investors, thirty seven of whom were clients, pursuant to a private placement which was conducted off the books of his member firm and thereby engaged in conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest, contrary to IIROC Dealer Member Rule 29.1. 8. Staff and the Respondent agrees to the following terms of settlement: a) The Respondent agrees to pay a fine to IIROC in the amount of thirty five thousand dollars ($35,000.00); b) As a condition of re-approval in any capacity, the Respondent shall successfully complete the Conduct and Practices Handbook examination; c) As a condition of re-approval in any capacity, the Respondent shall be subject to a period of one (1) year of strict supervision with reports to be filed with IIROC. 9. The Respondent agrees to pay costs to IIROC in the sum of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00). III. STATEMENT OF FACTS (i) Acknowledgment 10. Staff and the Respondent agree with the facts set out in this Section III and acknowledge that the terms of the settlement contained in this Settlement Agreement are based upon those specific facts.

- 3 - (ii) Factual Background Overview 11. While employed with MGI Securities Inc ( MGI ) between March, 2006 and October, 2008, the Respondent failed to disclose to his member firm his position as director and/or officer of eight corporations. Part of his outside business activity involved the facilitation and participation in an off-book private placement. Background 12. The Respondent has been a Registered Representative ( RR ) since 1995. 13. From May, 2002 to March, 2006 the Respondent worked as a RR at Leede Financial, and from March, 2006 to October, 2008, the Respondent worked as a RR with MGI. From October, 2008 until December, 2008 the Respondent worked briefly with Jennings Capital ( Jennings ). All positions were at branches in the City of Calgary. 14. On September 28, 2008 MGI advised IIROC via ComSet that it was conducting an internal investigation of the Respondent with respect to possible undisclosed outside business activities. 15. The MGI internal investigation identified eight companies in which the Respondent had possible undisclosed outside business activities. 16. On or about October 14, 2008, the Respondent resigned from his position with MGI and accepted a position with Jennings. 17. In or about December, 2008, the Respondent was terminated from his position with Jennings. 18. Staff opened an investigation, and interviewed the Respondent on March 2, 2010. 19. The Respondent has not been registered with any IIROC Dealer Member firm since December, 2008. 20. The Respondent has no previous disciplinary history with the IDA or IIROC. Outside Business Activities 21. While employed with MGI, the Respondent completed three internal outside business activities declaration forms in which he stated that he was not in violation of the member firm policy which required disclosure of any outside business activities.

- 4-22. The Respondent did advise MGI that he was a director of Nexum Energy Corp. He stated that this directorship was for the purpose of introducing Nexum to MGI for financing. 23. However, when Staff interviewed the Respondent, he admitted that while employed at MGI, he was a director, and in some cases an officer, of the following seven corporations: a) Amcan Forest Products Ltd.; b) Econcept Bio-Energy; c) Enersys Concepts Inc.; d) Nexum Ethanol; e) Nexum Renewables; f) Nexum Energy Corp; g) 1325709 Alberta Ltd. 24. The Respondent failed to disclose his outside business activities in these corporations to his member firm. Off-Book Securities Transactions 25. In September, 2005 the Respondent incorporated a private corporation named Amcan Forest Products Ltd. ( Amcan ), which was to be used as a funding vehicle to purchase equity in a biofuel startup named Okanagan Biofuels Inc. ( OBI ). 26. At all material times, the Respondent was the sole director, and a shareholder, of Amcan. 27. Between approximately December, 2006 and May, 2007, while employed with MGI in Calgary, the Respondent facilitated and participated in two common share distributions of Amcan on behalf of forty two individuals, thirty seven of whom were clients. In total, the Respondent raised approximately $837,000 for Amcan through this private placement. These securities transactions were conducted off the books of MGI and were not settled through the MGI back office. 28. The Respondent has admitted that the off-book securities transactions were conducted without the knowledge or consent of his employer. 29. The Respondent did not receive any commissions or fees from the off-book transactions. IV. TERMS OF SETTLEMENT 30. This settlement is agreed upon in accordance with IIROC Dealer Member Rules 20.35 to 20.40, inclusive and Rule 15 of the Dealer Member Rules of Practice and Procedure. 31. The Settlement Agreement is subject to acceptance by the Hearing Panel.

- 5-32. The Settlement Agreement shall become effective and binding upon the Respondent and Staff as of the date of its acceptance by the Hearing Panel. 33. The Settlement Agreement will be presented to the Hearing Panel at a hearing ( the Settlement Hearing ) for approval. Following the conclusion of the Settlement Hearing, the Hearing Panel may either accept or reject the Settlement Agreement. 34. If the Hearing Panel accepts the Settlement Agreement, the Respondent waives his/her/its right under IIROC rules and any applicable legislation to a disciplinary hearing, review or appeal. 35. If the Hearing Panel rejects the Settlement Agreement, Staff and the Respondent may enter into another settlement agreement; or Staff may proceed to a disciplinary hearing in relation to the matters disclosed in the Investigation. 36. The Settlement Agreement will become available to the public upon its acceptance by the Hearing Panel. 37. Staff and the Respondent agree that if the Hearing Panel accepts the Settlement Agreement, they, or anyone on their behalf, will not make any public statements inconsistent with the Settlement Agreement. 38. Unless otherwise stated, any monetary penalties and costs imposed upon the Respondent are payable immediately upon the effective date of the Settlement Agreement. 39. Unless otherwise stated, any suspensions, bars, expulsions, restrictions or other terms of the Settlement Agreement shall commence on the effective date of the Settlement Agreement. AGREED TO by the Respondent at the City of Chestermere in the Province of Alberta, this 10 th day of January, 2011. Witness signature WITNESS Todd Stefiuk RESPONDENT

- 6 - AGREED TO by Staff at the City of Calgary in the Province of Alberta, this 26 th day of January, 2011. Witness signature WITNESS David McLellan DAVID MCLELLAN Enforcement Counsel on behalf of Staff of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada ACCEPTED at the City of Calgary in the Province of Alberta, this 14 th day of February, 2011, by the following Hearing Panel: Per: Alan Beattie Panel Chair Per: Kathleen Jost Panel Member Per: Gary Godard Panel Member