Cost Recovery from Other Resources - General Management Support (GMS)

Similar documents
Joint report on cost recovery

Cost Recovery Overview. Joint UNDP, UNICEF, UNFPA and UN Women Executive Board informal 3 February 2017

Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme and of the United Nations Population Fund

Joint Informal Executive Board Presentation on Cost Recovery. 8 January 2013

United Nations DP-FPA/2013/1 E/ICEF/2013/8. Summary. Distr.: General 16 January Original: English

FAQs Cost-Recovery Policy

Ethiopia One UN Fund Terms of Reference

UN BHUTAN COUNTRY FUND

UNDP Executive Board Funding Dialogue. January 2015

Annotated Outline - Joint Cost Recovery Paper Background. I. Introduction. Presentation/Discussion of Proposals

Institutional budget for

Cost Recovery. Joint UNDP, UNICEF, UNFPA and UN Women Executive Boards briefing 26 April 2017

Economic and Social Council

DP/FPA-ICEF-UNW/2016/CRP.1

199 EX/5 Part II page 81. F. Structured Financing Dialogue (Follow-up to 197 EX/Decision 5 (IV, B)) A. Background. (i) Initial decision (2012)

Joint Briefing on Cost Recovery. Executive Boards of UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, and UN Women. 27 August 2018

We recommend the establishment of One UN at country level, with one leader, one programme, one budgetary framework and, where appropriate, one office.

Fifth Consolidated Annual Progress Report on Activities Implemented under the United Nations Bhutan Country Fund

JAG/DEC-2008/02 ITC UNDERSTANDING FINANCIAL RESOURCES EXPORT IMPACT FOR GOOD

Annex 1: The One UN Programme in Ethiopia

MTSP Planned Financial Estimates Executive Board September 2011

UNDP Financial Regulations and Rules

Contents. Part Two Budget mock-up May Original: English

Joint Briefing on Cost Recovery. Executive Boards of UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, and UN Women. 29 May 2018

FINAL 26 February PARTNERSHIP FOR PROGRESS: UN Civil Society Fund

AUDIT UNDP COUNTRY OFFICE BANGLADESH. Report No Issue Date: 28 May 2015

Cost Classification Results Based Budgeting

ANNEX I: QCPR MONITORING AND REPORTING FRAMEWORK

REPORT 2015/095 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

United Nations Fund for Recovery Reconstruction and Development in Darfur (UNDF)

Preliminary draft of the UNDP results-based biennial support budget estimates, *

Economic and Social Council

Operational Effectiveness of the UN MDTF Mechanism

Proposed Programme of Work and Budget

REPORT 2014/153 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION. Audit of the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction

Accelerating Progress toward the Economic Empowerment of Rural Women (RWEE) Multi-Partner Trust Fund Terms of Reference UN WOMEN, FAO, IFAD, WFP

October Hundred and Fortieth Session. Rome, October Measures to improve Implementation of the Organization's Support Cost Policy

Cost Recovery Update. Joint briefing with the Executive Boards of UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, and UN Women. 24 January 2018

Reporting of UNDP income from cost recovery

E Distribution: GENERAL EVALUATION REPORTS. Agenda item 5

REPORT 2016/038 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION. Audit of the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs operations in South Sudan

UNICEF Integrated Budget Informal Briefing to the Executive Board

Technical Note Funding the reinvigorated Resident Coordinator System

partnership charter I. Background II. Mission

February 2015 FC 157/10. Hundred and Fifty-seventh Session. Rome, 9-13 March FAO Cost Recovery Policy

Program and Budget Committee

Convention Secretariat s fundraising efforts and collaborative work

South Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund (South Sudan CHF) Terms of Reference (TOR)

Supplementary matrix 1

Hundred and Thirty-eighth Session. Rome, March Measures to Improve Implementation of the Organization s Support Cost Policy

AUDIT UNDP COUNTRY OFFICE SOMALIA. Report No Issue Date: 20 June 2014

United Nations Development Programme

AUDIT UNDP AFGHANISTAN. Local Governance Project (Project No ) Report No Issue Date: 23 December 2016

HSP/GC/25/5/Add.1 Governing Council of the United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Proposed work programme and budget for the biennium

October 2014 FC 155/5?? Hundred and Fifty-fifth Session. Rome, October Method for Determining the Indirect Support Cost Rate for WFP

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund (CHF) Revised Terms of Reference July 2008

Project Document Format for non-cpap Countries or Projects outside a CPAP

Dear Ms. Evans-Klock,

PARIS, 11 August 2009 Original: English

STANDARD MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) FOR MULTI-DONOR TRUST FUNDS USING PASS-THROUGH FUND MANAGEMENT

WFP Executive Board: Method for determining the ISC rate for WFP. Informal Consultation 5 September 2014

CRITERIA FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TRUST FUNDS WITHIN

PROGRESS REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL ON EXTRABUDGETARY RESOURCES AND ACTIVITIES SUMMARY

HLCM Procurement Network Procurement Process and Practice Harmonization in Support of Field Operations, Phase II

PROGRAMME AND BUDGETS * Proposals of the Director General

Implementation of Programme budget : update

Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme, the United Nations Population Fund and the United Nations Office for Project Services

October 2018 JM /3. Hundred and Twenty-fifth Session of the Programme Committee and Hundred and Seventy-third Session of the Finance Committee

European Commission United Nations Development Programme International IDEA

DECISION ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AT ITS ELEVENTH MEETING

Discussion Note Strengthening the system-wide funding architecture of operational activities of the United Nations for development

Ver 5 26Sep2016. Background Note. Funding situation of the UN development system

THIS IS UNFPA. Integrated Budget Executive Board informal 5 June 2017

AFGHANISTAN ALLOCATION GUIDELINES 22 JANUARY 2014

2008 SENIOR MANAGER S COMPACT

REPORT 2015/115 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE TOR - CONSULTANCY IC/2012/026. Date: 16 April 2012

Iraq United Nations Development Assistance Framework Fund. Terms of Reference

Economic and Social Council

Informal note by the co-facilitators final version

Consolidated Annual Financial Report on Activities Implemented under the DRC Humanitarian Fund

Revised Capacity Development Action Plan

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION AUDIT REPORT 2013/053. Audit of the management of the ecosystem sub-programme in the United Nations Environment Programme

AUDIT UNDP COUNTRY OFFICE UGANDA. Report No Issue Date: 22 August 2013

UNDG Fiduciary Management Oversight Group (FMOG) Terms of Reference

South Sudan Humanitarian Fund Operational Manual

Initial Structure and Staffing of the Secretariat

Arrangements for the revision of the terms of reference for the Peacebuilding Fund

47. This section presents the core budget for the biennium as proposed by the Executive Secretary:

2010 DAC REPORT ON MULTILATERAL AID

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Executive Board

Myanmar Emergency Response Fund Operational Manual

EXECUTIVE BOARD DECISION TRACKING TABLE: FIRST REGULAR SESSION 2018

Economic and Social Council

REPORT 2016/062 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION. Audit of the management of trust funds at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

JOB DESCRIPTION. TBC within Asia region Asia Regional Office International/TBD 2 years (with possible extension) Head of Programmes

OPERATIONAL INSTRUCTION REF. OI.IPMG ACCEPTANCE OF ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENTS

Financing of administrative and management costs

REPORT 2015/041 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION. Audit of the United Nations Mine Action Service of the Department of Peacekeeping Operations

137th session 20 May 2015 Provisional agenda item 5. Financing dialogue. Report by the Secretariat

Transcription:

Title Cost Recovery from Other Resources- General Management 1.0 Regulations and Rules Regulation 5.07: Contributions to Other Resources shall be subject to the following conditions: (a) Contributions shall be paid pursuant to an agreement made between the contributor and the Administrator; (b) Contributions shall be paid in advance of the allocation made for the implementation of planned UNDP programme activities, except as provided under the terms of Regulation 5.07(c); (c) Notwithstanding the provision of Regulation 5.07(b), allocations may be made on the basis of receivable co-financing contributions, in accordance with risk guidelines established by the Administrator. (d) Additional costs incurred by UNDP in administering the contribution shall be fully covered from the contribution. 2.0 Policy 2.1 UNDP distinguishes between two types of costs in the implementation of its activities. These are: a. Direct costs of programme, administrative and operational support activities, that are part of the project input; and b. Costs that are in addition to direct project costs, representing the costs to the organization that are not directly attributable to specific projects or services, but are necessary to fund the corporate structures, management and oversight costs of the organization. These costs are recovered by charging a cost recovery rate, known as General Management fee. 2.2 Regardless of the type of implementation costs, UNDP is required to recover the full costs of activities funded by other resources in support of UNDP programmes or services provided. 2.3 Costs to UNDP that are in addition to direct project costs associated with managing the implementation of programmes are levied through the application of the General Management fee. 2.4 The GMS fee encompasses costs incurred in providing general management and oversight functions of the organization as a whole. These costs are incurred in support of its activities, projects & programmes, and services provided, that cannot be traced unequivocally to specific activities, project or programmes. Furthermore, these costs are incurred throughout and at all levels of the organization. Page 1 of 8

2.5 All efforts must be made to recover fully the costs incurred by UNDP in providing services to programmes and projects (as well as to other UN entities - see Agency Reimbursable Services Section in the Resource Planning chapter of the Policies and Procedures) so that UNDP s Integrated Budget (regular resources) do not subsidize the management of other resources. A successful and consistent application of the cost recovery policy is a measure of the organization s ability to plan, and one geared towards attainting proper cost classification and ensuring cost attribution to the right funding source. 2.6 The harmonized conceptual framework for defining and attributing programme costs and organizational costs (DP-FPA/2012/1), and the harmonized methodology for calculating cost-recovery rates (DP-FPA/2013/1; DP/2013/9), have a direct impact on the cost recovery rates and the activities for which the cost recovery income can be utilized. 2.7 The GMS cost recovery rates, effective 1 January 2014, are: - The cost recovery rate (GMS percent) for third-party cost sharing and trust fund contributions increased from a minimum of 7 percent to a minimum of 8 percent for newly signed agreements; - 1 per cent reduction will be applied for thematic contributions at the global, regional and country level (8 percent 1 percent = 7 percent). - A GMS rate of 3 5% will continue to be applied to Government Cost Sharing contributions.the same rates applied to Government Cost Sharing apply for South-South contributions. - Any GMS rates that are negotiated centrally will remain at current levels until such time as they are renegotiated corporately. Page 2 of 8

SUMMARY OF GMS RATES Effective 1 January 2014 per EB decision 2013/9 Funding Type Third Party Contributions (cost sharing and Trust Funds) GMS prior to 2013 7% 8% GMS as of 01/01/2014 Comments Exceptions are rare and must be approved by OFRM as waivers that are reported to the Executive Board. Government Cost Sharing minimum of 3% no change While the minimum of 3% is still valid, it is only sufficient when applied to very large volume cost sharing contributions. Most Country Offices apply Government cost sharing GMS rates between 4-5%. South South Contributions N/A same as Govt Cost Sharing rate GMS rates are maintained for government cost sharing and South South Contributions. In other words, programme countries shall use the rate that applies to them for government cost sharing even when they contribute to results in another country through South- South Cooperation. Thematic Contributions at Country, Regional and Global Levels European Commission 7% 7% 7% 7% A 1 % reduction for thematic contributions at the global, regional and country level applies (8%-1%). This rate is applicable for contributions that are non- or lightly earmarked for UNDP programmes and not tied to a specific project, output or activity. Refer to paragraph 2.8, below. Based on the existing FAFA agreement, EC remains 7% GFATM 7% 7% Based on the October 2014 agreement between GFATM and UNDP, GFATM remains at 7% for a two year period. UN to UN Agency Contribution 7% 8% Note: If the UN is contributing towards local RCO activities, no GMS is charged in the spirit of the RC burden sharing exercise. a. GEF Managed Funds (GEF Trust Fund, Special Climate Change Fund, Least Developed Countries Fund, Nagoya Protocol Implementation Fund) 9.0% -9.5% 8.5% 9.0% -9.5% 8.5% Contributions over $10.0m GMS is 9.0%; contributions below $10.0m GMS is 9.5%. Page 3 of 8

b. Adaptation Fund GEF Cost Sharing 9.5% 9.5% In principle, the 8% GMS applies, however UNDP-GEF is required to negotiate higher rates to pay for the specialized technical skills and support architecture provided by the UNDP-GEF Unit. The approach of the Unit is to apply the same cost recovery amount as that which is agreed under the GEF (i.e. 9.5%). Montreal Protocol Trust Fund 7%-9% 7%-9% Interagency Pooled Funding a. UN Secretariat Administered Funds, CERF, UNTF for Human Security (UNTFHS) 7% 7% b. MPTF office Administered MDTFs 7% 7% c. Joint Programmes (Pass Through) administered by a variety of UN organizations 7% 7% 7% for projects above $250,000; 9% for projects below $250,000 Note: on a case by case basis a 6.5% fee is charged for projects in the production sector. MP In addition to the GMS, when UNDP/MPTF is the AA a 1% fee applies In addition to the GMS, when UNDP/MPTF is the AA a 1% fee applies d. ERF, UNMAS, UNAMI 7% 8% 8% GMS applies to contributions under the umbrella agreement of the UN Secretariat and the UN office in Geneva as communicated per UNICEF,UNDP,UNW,UNFPA joint letter to the UN dated 6 January 2014. 2.8 The intent of the 1 per cent reduction for thematic contributions is to incentivize the provision of non-earmarked or lightly earmarked funding for UNDP programmes, at the global regional or country levels. As such the 1% reduction may be granted for funding received that is un-earmarked; and for funding received at the global, regional or country office levels for a given programme outcome, but not specific to a project or sub-national geographic area, and can therefore be programmed at Page 4 of 8

UNDP s discretion. This would include Thematic Trust Fund contributions (excluding Country/Regional/Global windows as these are project specific). 2.9 The aim is for the cost recovery income generated from the GMS fee (Extrabudgetary Atlas Fund code 11300), effective 1 January 2014 to be utilized to fund personnel costs and related general operating expenses and other strategic investment costs in support of management activities as defined under category 4 of the harmonized cost classification framework. GMS can be used to fund management activities in all Units, including those that exist in Units broadly defined as providing DE services. 2.10 For Country Offices, management activities (cost classification category 4) are defined as follows: - 4- Management activities are activities and costs whose primary function is the promotion of the identity, executive direction, representation, accountability and well-being of the UNDP Country Office. These activities are grouped into three sub-clusters applicable to Country Office staff: - - 4a- Activities related to leading and defining the vision of the Country Office, as well as representing UNDP in advancing its core mandate and major programme goals with governments, donors and other third parties. - 4b- Programme Direction and Accountability: Activities related to overall managerial responsibility and accountability for achieving UNDP s role in supporting programme countries in achieving development results; ensuring continuous and simultaneous alignment (or re-alignment) of Country Programme results with national planning goals and UNDP Strategic Plan results, including responding to emerging needs mid-cycle; UNDP leadership role(s) in the UNCT programming processes and UNCT strategic meetings; strategic partnership management; and overall partnering and positioning of the programmatic work of the organization within the country. - 4c- Operations Management & Administration: Activities related to overall staff/office management and the provision of workplace and support services (ICT, Finance, OHR, UNDP security, travel, assets and general services) which permit UNDP to carry out the mission of the organization (but excluding direct project implementation support). Activities related to the harmonization and simplification of UN operational processes and business practices should also be included here. 2.11 For Headquarters, cost recovery income generated from GMS earned throughout UNDP shall be utilized in support of the following management functional activity clusters: Page 5 of 8

Functional/Activity Cluster Leadership and corporate direction Corporate oversight and assurance Corporate financial, ICT and administrative management Corporate human resource management Corporate external relations and partnerships, communications and resource mobilization Corporate Staff and premises security Offices Executive Office Regional Bureaus Office of Audit and Oversight Bureau Of Management OFRM/OIST/LSO/PSO Bureau of Management/OHR Bureau for External Relations & Advocacy Bureau of Management/Security 2.12 For activities funded by the cost recovery income that do not fall within the activities defined in items 2.10 and 2.11 above, the aim is that these are phased out during the 2014-2015 period and by 2016 are fully charged to the correct funding sources. By 2016, activities not covered under the management category, such as development effectiveness activities, should be funded from regular and other resources and directly charged to projects and programmes where applicable per the Direct Project Costs policy and guidelines (POPP Direct Project Costs (DPC) (link)). 2.13 UNDP staff must understand, and convey consistently to all partners the policy on cost recovery, in order to ensure their full and correct understanding. In particular, the following need to be highlighted: - The provision of quality general management support services to Other Resources-funded programmes is costly and requires constant investment by the Organization. - The Organization s Regular Resources budget cannot subsidize the management of Other Resources-funded programmes. - Cost recovery fees are not just overheads. Income from cost recovery is invested by UNDP to sustain the corporate structures both locally and at headquarters designated to provide general management support to Other Resources-funded programmes. Without these corporate structures, the Other Resources-funded programmes could not be performed. - The cost recovery policy applies to all Other Resources contributions, without exceptions (projects funded from Regular Resources are not subject to a GMS fee as the Integrated Budget covers the provision of management support costs to these projects). - The application of this cost recovery policy more equitably shares the cost of management activities between regular and other resources. By funding qualified development effectiveness activities, where appropriate, directly from programmes and projects (applying Direct Project Costing methodologies), GMS cost recovery resources presently will fund management activities that were previously financed from regular Page 6 of 8

resources. These regular resources shall then be re-allocated to finance programme activities - a major benefit of the cost recovery framework. In addition, this ensures that organizational costs are aligned to appropriate results frameworks and funding streams and that UNDP can more sustainably finance the requisite organizational structures and capacities to successfully deliver on programme results. - This approach to funding costs ensures that costs are not funded twice, by separating clearly those costs to be funded through direct charges to projects, those costs funded by regular resources for regular resource funded project activities, and those management costs funded through GMS income. The cost recovery income generated from the GMS fee is distributed among the units providing general management support. The distribution reflected below was approved by the EG in January 2015. There are benefits in maintaining a standard and consistent approach to GMS distribution. Any proposed changes to these distributions must first receive the approval of the Office of Financial Resources Management (bom.ofa.riskmanagement@undp.org). 3.0 Procedures Please refer to the procedures in the section General Management fee Set Up and Collection Ref. Business process, subprocess and related tasks 1.0 Ensure the implementation of new cost recovery policy for new and renewed Roles (Responsible Party or Office) UNDP office Template of Form (Document or URL) Explanatory Notes/Link to Guidance Notes. Page 7 of 8

agreements eod 1 January 2014 2.0 Ensure to follow the internal GMS distribution as prescribed in para 2.13 3.0 Seek an approval for any deviations or exceptions either on GMS rate or internal distribution 4.0 Review requests on exceptions 5.0 Submit proposals on special GMS rate or distribution 6.0 Endorse GMS waivers and distribution. Report to the EB on all waiver cases. UNDP office UNDP office OFRM & Fund Managers ExO Page 8 of 8