A new European framework: MAR and CSMAD

Similar documents
Market Abuse Regulation. NEVIR & AFM Webinar 13 October 2016

Market Abuse Regulation Extends the Scope and Application of the Market Abuse Regime

Market Abuse Regulation (MAD II)

EBF POSITION ON THE REVIEW OF THE MARKET ABUSE DIRECTIVE

The new EU regulatory framework for commodity derivatives & MiFiD II/MiFIR implementation Brussels, 20 September 2017

Market Abuse A New Regime for Debt Issuers

Market Abuse Regulation: Have you completed your Checklist for 3 July 2016?

ALERT. Market Abuse Regulation. London Asset Management. June 15, 2016

(Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Practice Pointers on EU Market Abuse Regulation: Requirements for U.S. Issuers

Public Consultation on a Revision of the Market Abuse Directive (MAD)

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 4 April 2014 (OR. en) 2011/0295 (COD) PE-CONS 78/13 EF 155 ECOFIN 726 DROIPEN 95 CODEC 1841

OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN SECURITIES AND MARKETS AUTHORITY (ESMA) Of 27 September 2017

Keeping ahead of financial crime

Insider Dealing Regulations. Short description. Scope

MiFID 2/MiFIR Articles relevant to article The top 10 things every commodities firm needs to know about MiFID 2

TRANSPOSITION TABLES OF MARKET ABUSE DIRECTIVE AND ITS IMPLEMENTING MEASURES

Questions and Answers. On the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR)

FRG Breakfast Briefing 219. Thursday 15 October 2015

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on energy market integrity and transparency

FBF S RESPONSE. The FBF welcomes the opportunity to comment EC consultation on a revision of the Market Abuse directive.

The Market Abuse Regulation in Belgium

MARKET ABUSE REGULATION

Regulatory reform of EU commodity derivatives markets

Athens Exchange S.A. Response to European Commission s Public Consultation on A Revision of the Market Abuse Directive (MAD)

FNG. Limited liability company ("Société Anonyme/Naamloze Vennootschap") incorporated under the laws of Belgium

The Market Abuse Regulation & AIM

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of XXX

TM Group Consulting. MAR - Market Abuse Regulation Recap

General principles of European and National regulation of markets in financial instruments

Detailed Contents. 1 Foundations of Capital Markets Legislature in Europe. 1 History 1 I. Introduction 2 II. Segré Report (1966) 2 III.

Translation of Liechtenstein Law

Gemalto. Policy on Inside information and Trading in Financial Instruments. (also called: Insider Trading Policy)

REVIEW OF THE MARKET ABUSE DIRECTIVE - General comments on the European Commission proposals

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 10 October 2013 (OR. en) 2011/0307 (COD) PE-CONS 37/13 EF 115 ECOFIN 439 DRS 107 CODEC 1296

(Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 173, , p. 84)

DGG 1B EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 3 May 2016 (OR. en) 2013/0314 (COD) PE-CONS 72/15 EF 228 ECOFIN 973 CODEC 1710

Frequently Asked Questions Protection of the euro and other currencies against counterfeiting

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on Short Selling and certain aspects of Credit Default Swaps

EU Market Abuse Regulation and asset managers six months to go

Regulatory reform of EU commodity derivatives markets

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 23 July 2014 (OR. en) 2012/0168 (COD) LEX 1569 PE-CONS 75/1/14 REV 1 EF 84 ECOFIN 270 CODEC 808

DEUTSCHES AKTIENINSTITUT

INSIDER POLICY. 1 About the insider policy. 2 Summary

REPLY TO THE COMMISSION S CALL FOR EVIDENCE ON THE REVIEW OF DIRECTIVE 2003/6/EC ON INSIDER DEALING AND MARKET MANIPULATION (MARKET ABUSE DIRECTIVE)

Platts Kingsman EU Sugar Seminar MiFID II & MAR: what does increased international regulatory scrutiny mean for sugar?

RTS 28: Draft regulatory technical standards on criteria for establishing when an activity is to be considered to be ancillary to the main business

Market Abuse Directive

FINANCIAL CONTROL OF FUNDS CO-FINANCED FROM THE EU BUDGET: POSSIBILITIES OF CONSIDERING NEW AND MORE FAVORABLE LEGAL PROVISIONS

Entry into force of amendments to capital markets transparency legislation

MFSA MALTA FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY. Unit Tel: (+356) To: The Company Secretary Unit Fax: (+356)

General Overview. EU Market Abuse Regime

Effective surveillance and enforcement techniques

Response Commission Consultation Paper a Revision of the Market Abuse Directive (MAD)


EU and US financial markets regulatory developments (January 2014 to present) Marek Svoboda FX CG mtg Frankfurt am Main, 6 May 2014

GUIDELINES FOR INSIDERS OF LISTED COMPANIES

MiFID 2/MiFIR Articles relevant to article The top 10 things every commodities firm needs to know about MiFID 2

MJ GLEESON PLC Company No:

Obligation to notify market abuse

L 145/30 Official Journal of the European Union

7411/14 IL/SS/sr 1 DGG 1B

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

TREATY SERIES 2003 Nº 2. Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions

3.3 Manipulation of the Rexel Security s Market Price Blackout Periods relative to the Publication of Financial Statements...

MARKET ABUSE DIRECTIVE INSTRUMENT 2005

GUIDELINES FOR INSIDERS OF LISTED COMPANIES

(Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 173, , p. 349)

(Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN SECURITIES REGULATORS

MiFID II/MiFIR. Compliance Day. Directive 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 600/2014. Sabine Schönangerer

Insider Trading Policy in accordance with the Belgian Corporate Governance Code 2009

Financial Stability and Market Confidence sourcebook. Chapter 2. Short selling

Heineken N.V. Insider Dealing Policy

ABI response to ESMA s discussion paper on possible implementing measures under the Market Abuse Regulation

3: Equivalent markets

MiFID 2/MiFIR Articles relevant to article The top 10 things every investment banker should know about MiFID 2. EU Council MiFID 2 general approach

Market Abuse Directive. Level 3 Third set of CESR guidance and information on the common operation of the Directive to the market. Public Consultation

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

A8-0126/2. Amendment 2 Roberto Gualtieri on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs

EMIS GROUP PLC SHARE DEALING CODE

Financial Stability and Market Confidence sourcebook

The Market Abuse Regulation - Impact on AIM Companies

Supervision and enforcement: where is Luxembourg heading? 15 November 2016

Avv. Salvatore Providenti Bergamo University The slides are based on a common work with Avv. Alessandra Atripaldi

Public disclosure of inside information. Publication date: June 2016

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR INTERNAL DEALING

1: yes directly; 2: yes, in collaborat.; 3: yes, with judicial aut AT BE CY CZ DK EE FI FR DE EL HU IS IE IT LV LT LU MT NL NO PL PT SK SI SE ES UK

Free translation of the official French version INSIDER TRADING POLICY

The incoming Market Abuse Regulation (MAR)

decision to firm-up to trade

Questions and answers

Review of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive. Questionnaire on MiFID/MiFIR 2 by Markus Ferber MEP

Financial Penalties for Member States who fail to comply with Judgments of the European Court of Justice: European Commission clarifies rules

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 29 April 2014 (OR. en) 2011/0298 (COD) PE-CONS 23/14 EF 32 ECOFIN 89 CODEC 236

Commercial market participants view of financial regulatory reform. DG AGRI Commodities expert group (14 February 2014, Brussels)

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

CBOE EUROPE RECOGNISED INVESTMENT EXCHANGE RULE BOOK

Questions and Answers On the common operation of the Market Abuse Directive

Transcription:

A new European framework: MAR and CSMAD Sébastien Bagot, Securities Markets DG Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union Brussels, 9 November 2016

Objectives of MAD review Outline Key aspects of MAR (Regulation 596/2014 on market abuse) Key aspects of CSMAD (Directive 2014/57/EU on criminal sanctions for market abuse) 2

MAD Review (1) Former MAD Current MAR and CSMAD Directive 2003/6/EC of 28 January 2003 on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse) Regulation 596/2014/EU on Insider Dealing and Market Manipulation (Market Abuse)* (* Legally binding and directly applicable) + Implementing measures Directive 2014/57/EU on Criminal Sanctions for Market Abuse** (** Requires transposition by the MSs) + delegated and implementing acts 3

MAD Review (2) MAD 2003 overtaken by market and technological developments; sanctions lacking deterrent effect; Key objectives: update and strengthen EU market abuse framework by extending its scope (MTFs, OTFs, crossmarket abuse), reinforcing capacity of regulators to detect and sanction abuse and enhance cooperation between regulators; Response to LIBOR scandal - extend market abuse rules to manipulation of benchmarks and criminalise such manipulation across the EU. 4

Scope of the New Market Abuse Framework 1. Transactions, orders or behaviours relating to a financial instrument requested/admitted to trading or traded on a regulated market, MTF or OTF, or whose price depends on or has an effect on such an instrument (e.g. CDS); includes emission allowances; 2. irrespective of whether or not the behaviour or transactions actually take place on a trading venue; 3. Interaction between spot commodity contracts (not wholesale energy products) and financial instruments; 4. Behaviour in relation to benchmarks; 5. Actions and omissions in the Union and a third country. 5

Exemptions -MAR exemption for transactions, orders or behaviour, by: Member States, members of ESCB, the Union, the Commission, ministries and other public bodies (listed in Article 6 of MAR), in pursuit of monetary, exchange rate or public debt management policy Extended to certain third-country central banks Activities of a Member State, the Commission or other officially desiganted bodies in pursuite of Union's climate policy or Union's Common Fisheries Policy -Exemption for buy-back programmes and stabilisation 6

Inside Information and Insider Dealing Information of a precise nature, which is not public, relating to an issuer or a financial instrument/spot commodity contract, and which, if made public, would have a significant effect on prices; Also price-sensitive information in relation to commodity derivatives or spot commodity contracts and this information is reasonably expected to be disclosed; Significant effect on price means information a reasonable investor would be likely to use as part of the basis of investment decisions; Insider dealing - where a person uses inside information by transacting, on his own account or for the account of a third party, in a financial instrument to which that inside information relates. 7

ESMA Guidelines on commodity derivatives inside information In addition to the elements defining inside information, inside information on commodity derivatives is information that "is reasonably expected or required to be disclosed in accordance with legal or regulatory provisions at Union or national level, market rules, contract, practice or custom, on the relevant commodity derivatives markets or spot markets." Guidelines published on 30/09/2016 provide a non-exhaustive indicative list. other conditions of inside information also need to be fulfilled do not impose any additional information disclosure requirements 8

Legitimate behaviour For persons in possession of inside information, no presumption of insider dealing for trading in specific cases, such as Adequate and effective arrangements in place for legal persons (Information Wall); Legitimate business of buying /selling financial instruments by market makers / persons authorised to execute orders on behalf of third parties; Transaction carried out in the discharge of an obligation (that arose before inside information) that has become due. 9

Market Manipulation Entering into a transaction or behaviour that: gives or is likely to give false or misleading signals as to the supply/demand/price of financial instrument; or secures or is likely to secure the price of a financial instrument at an artificial/abnormal level. Unless carried out for legitimate reasons pursuant to accepted market practice Transaction or behaviour by employing a fictitious device or other form of deception; Disseminating misleading information; Transmitting false or misleading information, providing false or misleading inputs, or any action which manipulates the calculation of a benchmark. 10

Prevention and Detection of Market Abuse Obligation on trading venues to have arrangements, procedures and systems aimed at preventing and detecting market abuse Obligation on any professional arranging or executing transactions in financial instruments to have arrangements and systems to detect and report suspicious orders and transaction 11

Disclosure Requirements Public disclosure of inside information as soon as possible. Special cases: SME Growth Markets (possible publication on a trading venue's website) Emission allowance market participants (not if below minimum threshold) Where publication is delayed for legitimate reasons - ex post notification to CA Where information is systemically important, disclosure may be delayed only with prior consent of the CA Insider lists and Managers' transactions 12

Whistleblowing Whistleblowers may bring new information to the attention of competent authorities which assists them in detecting and imposing sanctions in cases of insider dealing and market manipulation. However, whistleblowing may be deterred for fear of retaliation, or for lack of incentives. Measures regarding whistleblowing are necessary to facilitate detection of market abuse and to ensure the protection and the respect of the rights of the whistleblower and the accused person. 13

Administrative Measures and Sanctions Maximum administrative pecuniary sanctions : At least three times the profit/loss avoided At least EUR 5 million (natural persons) for the main offences At least EUR 15 million or 15% of total annual turnover (legal persons) for the main offences Also: disgorgement of profits gained/losses avoided, withdrawal or suspension of authorisations, ban against members of the firms' bodies Member States may provide for additional sanctioning powers and higher levels of sanctions than those in MAR 14

Criminal Sanctions for Market Abuse Directive (CSMAD) Criminal sanctions have a greater deterrent effect fear of imprisonment and a criminal record Minimum rules on criminal offences and on criminal sanctions were essential for ensuring the effectiveness of the EU policy on market integrity. Criminal sanctions demonstrate social disapproval of a qualitatively different nature compared to administrative sanctions or compensation mechanisms under civil law Article 83(2) of the Treaty (TFEU) (first time) 15

Minimum Rules harmonising criminal offences of Market Abuse (when committed intentionally and at least in serious cases) - Insider Dealing, unlawful disclosure of inside information and market manipulation - Inciting, Aiding and Abetting - Attempt Scope of application the same as MAR Exclusions from the scope: buy-back programmes, stabilisation, monetary, exchange rate and public debt management activities; climate, agriculture and fisheries policies Accepted market practices, legitimate behaviours, market Soundings 16

Criminal Sanctions MSs shall ensure criminal Offences are punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties for natural and legal persons For natural persons: - maximum term of imprisonment of at least 4 years for insider dealing and market manipulation - maximum term of imprisonment of at least 2 years for unlawful disclosure of inside information For legal persons: - criminal or non-criminal fines and other sanctions such as exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid, temporary or permanent disqualification from the practice of commercial activities, judicial supervision and judicial winding-up 17

Thank you for your attention (*) DG FISMA / Unit C3 Securities Markets sebastien.bagot@ec.europa.eu (*) Please note that the above does not constitute binding legal advice and comes without prejudice to the position the commission may take in proceedings or on any other occasion. The sole aim is to clarify the relevant lines of argument that can be deployed in this matter. 18