OHIO MPO AND LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2015 SUMMARY

Similar documents
OHIO MPO & LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2017 SUMMARY

Technical Memorandum. Finance. Prepared for: Prepared by: In cooperation with: High Street Consulting Group

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Transportation Trust Fund Overview

Financial Snapshot October 2014

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

Financial. Snapshot An appendix to the Citizen s Guide to Transportation Funding in Missouri

INTRODUCTION. 1 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART...

Pioneer Valley Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Proposed Amendments January 2017

WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. Financial Summary

CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

SKATS FY 2018-FY 2023

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2017

Contents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205

Chapter 15. Transportation Improvements Financing. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments Regional Transportation Plan

Chapter 6: Financial Resources

Transportation Improvement Program and Incentives for Local Planning

FEDERAL FUNDING SOURCES

A Moment of Truth: Ohio s Transportation Funding Problem, and How to Solve It. Better Transportation for Working and Living

House Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.

NASHVILLE AREA MPO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Concord Township Cincinnati, City of Macedonia, City of... 9 Middleport, Village of Dayton, City of... 11

Technical Report No. 4. Revenue and Costs

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

Recommendations for On the Move Plan Elements -- DRAFT MAY 23 Funding Goal Group June 22, 2006 Page 1

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Redbook. Department of Transportation

NASHVILLE AREA MPO. ADJUSTMENT to The Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program. Adjustment Number: TIP Number:

CHAPTER 4 1 Transportation Financial Analysis

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2018

RIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning

Potential Changes to the 2015 to 2018 TIP Highway List. Proposed Administrative Adjustment #3

Summary Narrative of Amendment 3 to the FFY Transportation Improvement Program for the Northern Middlesex Region

In addition to embarking on a new dialogue on Ohio s transportation priorities,

Appendix. G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

Funding Update. House Transportation Subcommittee on Long-Term Infrastructure Planning September 10, 2015, 9:00 A.M. Capitol Extension E2.

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance

7.0 Financially Feasible Plan

Capital Improvement Projects

APPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

N A D O N A D O R E S E A R C H F O U N D AT I O N R P O A M E R I C A

Financial Capacity Analysis

Technical Appendix. FDOT 2040 Revenue Forecast

ROCHESTER - OLMSTED COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MEMORANDUM

Fiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2011

2012 Boston MPO Transportation Improvement Program

Corridors of Commerce DRAFT Scoring and Prioritization Process. Patrick Weidemann Director of Capital Planning and Programming November 1, 2017

Fiscal Year Revised VDOT Annual Budget November 2014

UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

Prioritization and Programming Process. NCDOT Division of Planning and Programming November 16, 2016

FY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction

Safety Target Meeting Summary 10/3/2017

PROGRAM FINANCING FUNDING

FY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY CERTIFICATION NARRATIVE FY 2016

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRYAN DISTRICT T I P

Prepared by the South East Texas Regional Planning Commission-Metropolitan Planning Organization (SETRPC-MPO) December 6, 2013

Annual Listing of Obligated Projects Federal Fiscal Year 2013

APPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan Plans

Amendment 6 - OKI 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

P.L.2016, CHAPTER 56, approved October 14, 2016 Assembly, No. 10 (Fourth Reprint)

State Infrastructure Bank Annual Financial Report

FY February Quarterly Revision. Bryan DISTRICT

City Engineers Association of Minnesota Annual Conference January 31, 2013

APPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

Estimated Financial Summary for the Highway and Bridge Construction Schedule

Danny Straessle Public Information Officer ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

State Infrastructure Bank Annual Financial Report

PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE

Financial Analysis Working Paper 1 Existing Funding Sources Draft: April 2007

Traffic. Municipal Manager. Traffic Administration. Transportation Planning. Traffic Engineering. Communications. Data. Paint and Signs.

SFY 2018 (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) Annual Report

Congestion Management Process. Prepared by: Ghyabi & Associates, Inc.

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE

Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation

Northern Virginia Transportation Commission: 2018 Legislative and Policy Agenda

Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan

CRTPO Project Selection Direct Attributable & Bonus Allocation Funds

Regional Equity Analysis Of Current Funding (Highway STIP and CIP) Project Selection Advisory (PSA) Council

HB2 and HB1887 Update

Transportation Funding

Terre Haute Seelyville West Terre Haute Vigo County. Brazil Harmony Knightsville Clay County

FAIRBANKS METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM POLICIES & PROCEDURES

Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts Performance Audit Division

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

2040 Plan Update. Land Use Advisory Committee March 16, 2017

VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION. FY2016 Budget. Sue Minter, Secretary of Transportation House Transportation Committee

Transcription:

OHIO MPO AND LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2015 SUMMARY

TABLE OF CONTENTS MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW.. 3 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2015 STP BUDGET SUMMARY......... 4 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2015 CMAQ BUDGET SUMMARY.......... 5 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2015 TA BUDGET SUMMARY......... 6 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2015 TOTAL BUDGET SUMMARY... 7 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2015 PROGRAM SUMMARY... 8 TOTAL SUMMARY........ 9 OHIO STATEWIDE URBAN CMAQ COMMITTEE... 10 AMATS... 11 EASTGATE.. 12 MORPC........ 13 MVRPC...... 14 NOACA... 15 OKI....... 16 SCATS... 17 TMACOG...... 18 BEL-O-MAR..... 19 BHJ........... 20 CCSTCC......... 21 ERPC.... 22 KYOVA..... 23 LACRPC.... 24 LCATS... 25 RCRPC........ 26 WWW....... 27 FINDLAY....... 28 LANCASTER........ 29 MARION...... 30 WOOSTER...... 31 ZANESVILLE...... 32 DEFINITIONS. 33 2

MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Ohio Department of Transportation () annually allocates Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) transportation capital improvement budgets to Ohio s 17 Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) and to five large cities located outside of MPO areas. MPOs are transportation planning entities in urbanized areas exceeding 50,000 population comprised principally of local elected officials that conduct federally required transportation planning processes for their regions. defines large cities as municipalities, outside MPO areas, with populations between 25,000 and 50,000. The transportation budgets include three separate FHWA fund types: Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ) Transportation Alternatives Program (TA) MPO and Large City Boundaries These budget allocations provide an important source of federal funding to assist Ohio s urbanized areas and large cities in maintaining, operating, and improving their multimodal transportation networks. The MPOs and large cities manage the budgets by selecting and monitoring the implementation of fiscally balanced, multi-year programs of local government sponsored multimodal transportation system improvement projects within their respective geographies. Projects are to address identified system needs and result in measurable improvements to local transportation network conditions. By policy, encourages the MPOs and large cities to maximize annual transportation improvement project awards and minimize annual budget carry forward balances. In order to meet these policy criteria, the MPOs and large cities must closely collaborate with local government project sponsors, project development consultants, and project managers to assure projects are developed and awarded on schedule, on scope, and within budget. 3

MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2015 STP BUDGET SUMMARY Each MPO and large city receives an annual STP budget. STP budgets are comprised of federally required allocations and discretionary allocations. For SFY 2015, $189m of budget was available for the MPO and Large Cities Program. Of the original SFY 2015 budget, approximately 80% was a required allocation with the remaining 20% being discretionary. allocations are proportionate to the respective MPO s/large cities populations. STP funding is eligible for financing a wide range of multimodal preservation, operating, and capital transportation system improvement projects. Eligible project types include: Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, restoration, and operational improvements for federal aid highways and bridges on any public road Capital costs for transit projects Carpool projects, fringe and corridor parking facilities and programs, Bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways Highway and transit safety infrastructure improvements and programs Capital and operating costs for traffic monitoring, management, and control facilities SFY 2015 MPO and Large City STP Capital $15M $174M 4

MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2015 CMAQ BUDGET SUMMARY MPOs in US EPA designated air quality areas are eligible to use CMAQ Program funding, with 15 of Ohio s 17 MPOs meeting this criteria. For Ohio s eight large MPOs (>200,000 population urbanized area in Ohio) is grouped into one statewide program with one statewide budget. The remaining seven small MPOs (<200,000 population urbanized area in Ohio) receive individual allocations. The eight large MPOs collectiviely establish, prioritize, and manage annual programs of CMAQ projects. Managing the eight large MPOs CMAQ programs as one unified statewide budget positions the program to maximize expenditures and finance projects with the greatest air quality improvement returns to Ohio. CMAQ budgets are an discretionary allocation. For SFY 2015, $91.8m in budget was available for the MPO Program. CMAQ Program funding is eligible for financing projects that will result in reductions in mobile source pollutant emissions. Eligible project types include: Traffic flow congestion mitigation projects such as turn lanes, roundabouts, traffic signal, and intersection improvements Diesel engine retrofits and advanced truck technologies Freight and intermodal projects Transit capital and new service operations Travel Demand Management Bicycle and pedestrian improvements Carpooling and vanpooling Alternative fuels and vehicles SFY 2015 MPO and Large City CMAQ Capital $16M $75M 5

MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2015 TA BUDGET SUMMARY Each MPO receives an annual TA program budget. TA program budgets are ten percent of the respective MPO s STP budget and are comprised of federally required allocations and discretionary allocations. For SFY 2015, $20.6m of budget was available for the MPO Program. Of the orignial SFY 2015 budget, approximately 65% was a required allocation with the remaining 35% being discretionary. The TA program provides a funding source for projects that will advance modal transportation options and integrate transportation infrastructure within social (community) and natural environments. Eligible project types include: On- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities Community improvement activities Environmental mitigation Recreational trail program projects Safe routes to school projects Planning, designing, or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways The Bel-O-Mar, LARPC, LCATS, and WWW MPOs return their annual budget allocations to participate in s statewide TA program. SFY 2015 MPO and Large City TA Capital $3M $17M 6

MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2015 TOTAL BUDGET SUMMARY Original Available Original Available Original Available AMATS $9,481,921 $15,775,165 $948,192 $1,006,654 Eastgate $5,123,356 $6,535,121 $512,336 $565,679 MORPC $20,044,209 $35,879,610 $2,004,421 $8,020,989 MVRPC $10,835,414 $17,198,569 Ohio Statewide Urban $1,083,541 $884,795 NOACA $27,575,220 $49,730,963 CMAQ Committee $2,757,521 $3,858,388 OKI $20,617,864 $22,538,388 $2,061,786 $3,275,821 SCATS $4,670,515 $12,498,802 $467,052 $869,084 TMACOG $7,509,135 $9,112,742 $750,914 $1,314,810 Bel-O-Mar $403,679 $1,493,629 $499,140 $2,293,669 BHJ $622,247 $1,246,229 $494,241 $1,296,175 $62,225 $15,325 CCSTCC $1,547,246 $4,263,030 $980,790 $1,989,867 $154,725 $327,006 ERPC $898,239 $4,243,287 $89,824 $364,827 KYOVA $494,721 $363,919 $421,223 $49,472 $80,000 LACRPC $1,122,919 $2,062,112 $753,893 $201,106 LCATS $1,154,783 $2,166,351 $952,692 $3,474,906 RCRPC $1,257,801 $277,065 $125,780 $27,434 WWW $318,267 $625,041 $304,454 $276,150 Findlay $602,491 $926,101 Lancaster $567,075 $1,706,713 Marion $538,663 $220,003 Wooster $381,935 $591,085 Zanesville $372,693 $600,163 Statewide CMAQ $56,569,557 $81,878,063 Total $116,140,393 $189,690,169 $60,918,686 $91,831,160 $11,067,789 $20,610,814 7

MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM SFY 2015 PROGRAM SUMMARY The MPO and Large City program provides a significant source of federal funds to assist Ohio s urban area local governments in preserving, operating, and improving their multimodal transportation systems. The MPOs and large cities collaborate with their member local governments to establish fiscally balanced, multi-year programs of transportation system improvement projects for their regions. Prioritization involves a challenging process of allocating finite fiscal resources to develop an optimal regional transportation investment program that balances preservation, operational, capacity, and modal transportation priorities. In SFY 2015 the MPO and Large City Program awarded 150 construction projects and financed 9 public transit projects totaling $287 million. Tables 1 and 2 below identify the diverse mix of transportation improvement project types financed during SFY 2015. An ongoing focus of the MPO and Large City Program is to maximize annual project awards and minimize annual budget carry forward amounts. For a number of years, prior to SFY 2014, the Program had experienced annual carry forward budget amounts in the $150m range. Beginning with SFY 2014, and the MPOs agreed to institute a policy to limit the amount of budget MPOs and large cities could carry forward into the subsequent SFY. This policy has been a success. In SFY 14 the Program carry forward balance was $106m. In SFY 2015 the MPO and Large City carry forward budget balance was reduced to $35m. Current program estimates point toward additional reductions in SFY 2016 to a total of $21m. The remainder of this report shows the detailed SFY 2015 budgets, expenditures, and carry forward balances for each Ohio MPO and the five large cities. Bike 13 Public Transit System Investments Bridge Capacity Addition Enhancement Intersection 8 9 13 16 Construction Contracts Awarded ADA Paratransit Service Alternative Fuel Purchase 1 1 Public Transit System Investments Pavement 53 New Service Start-Up 1 Rehab/ Reconstruction 18 RR Grade Separation Sidewalk Signals 1 7 8 Vehicle Purchase/ Replacement *A total of 38 buses purchased Other Capital Costs 1 5 Other CMAQ 4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Table 1: FY 2015 Construction Contracts Awarded Table 2: FY 2015 s by Project Type 8

MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM TOTAL SFY 2015 Original 15 Let CE 15 STP $116,140,393 $189,690,169 $160,014,067 $1,873,056 $5,685,000 $4,090,376 $15,474,094 150.00% 13.32% CMAQ $60,918,686 $91,831,160 $55,350,737 $1,314,158 $15,537,222 $61,192 $16,766,584 123.22% 27.52% TA $11,067,789 $20,610,814 $16,896,071 $274,037 $3,440,706 155.14% 31.09% STP Planning - $2,553,576 - - - $1 CMAQ Planning - $2,801,267 - - - $1 Totals $188,126,868 $302,132,143 $237,615,718 $3,461,251 $21,222,222 $4,151,568 $35,681,386 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $266,450,759 as % of Original 2015 : 141.63% as % of Available 2015 : 88.19% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 150 $200 $180 $250 $160 $140 $200 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $150 $100 $50 Original SFY 11 SFY 12 SFY 13 SFY 14 SFY 15 5 Year - Trend 9

OHIO STATEWIDE URBAN CMAQ COMMITTEE Original STP - - - - - - - - - CMAQ $56,569,557 $81,878,063 $51,445,919 $1,291,956 $15,537,222 $10,932,201 120.69% 19.33% TA - - - - - - - - - STP Planning - - - - - - CMAQ Planning - $2,670,767 - - - - Totals $56,569,557 $81,878,063 $54,116,685 $1,291,956 $15,537,222 $10,932,201 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $70,945,863 as % of Original 2015 : 125.41% as % of Available 2015 : 86.65% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: - ** Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee construction contracts awarded are shown on the respective MPO Program Management Summary pages. $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 AMATS Eastgate MORPC MVRPC NOACA OKI SCATS TMACOG 5 Participating Year - MPOs in Trend the Statewide CMAQ Program 10

AMATS (AKRON) Original STP $9,481,921 $15,775,165 $14,588,505 $406,623 $780,037 158.14% 8.23% CMAQ** TA $948,192 $1,006,654 $901,222 $105,432 95.05% 11.12% STP Planning - - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $10,430,113 $16,781,819 $15,489,727 $406,623 $885,469 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $15,896,350 as % of Original 2015 : 152.41% as % of Available 2015 : 94.72% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 14 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY 11-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 Original $4 $5 $2 5 Year - Trend 11

EASTGATE (YOUNGSTOWN) Original STP $5,123,356 $6,535,121 $6,129,470 $154,254 $151,397 124.60% 2.96% CMAQ** TA $512,336 $565,679 $388,754 $7,811 $169,114 77.40% 33.01% STP Planning - $100,000 - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $5,635,692 $7,100,800 $6,618,224 $162,066 $320,511 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $6,780,289 as % of Original 2015 : 120.31% as % of Available 2015 : 95.49% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 17 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY 11-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 Original 5 Year - Trend 12

MORPC (COLUMBUS) Original STP $20,044,209 $35,879,610 $29,442,002 $79,842 $2,093,716 $3,750,050 160.29% 18.71% CMAQ** TA $2,004,421 $8,020,989 $7,832,041 $188,948 400.16% 0.00% STP Planning - $514,000 - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $22,048,630 $43,900,600 $37,788,043 $268,790 $2,093,716 $3,750,051 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $40,150,549 as % of Original 2015 : as % of Available 2015 : 182.10% 91.46% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 8 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY 11-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $40 $35 $30 $40 $35 $30 Original $25 $20 $15 $25 $20 $15 $10 $10 $5 $5 5 Year - Trend 13

MVRPC (DAYTON) Original STP $10,835,414 $17,198,569 $14,007,206 $363,997 $2,445,663 136.15% 22.57% CMAQ** TA $1,083,541 $884,795 $843,592 $21,331 $19,872 79.82% 1.83% STP Planning - $381,703 - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $11,918,955 $18,083,363 $15,232,501 $385,328 $2,465,535 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $15,617,829 as % of Original 2015 : as % of Available 2015 : 131.03% 86.37% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 18 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY 11-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $20 $18 $25 $16 $14 $20 $12 $10 $8 $6 $15 $10 Original $4 $2 $5 5 Year - Trend 14

NOACA (CLEVELAND) Original STP $27,575,220 $49,730,963 $42,283,189 $742,988 $2,500,000 $3,258,787 168.53% 11.82% CMAQ** TA $2,757,521 $3,858,388 $2,189,991 $33,856 $1,634,541 80.65% 59.28% STP Planning - $946,000 - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $30,332,741 $53,589,352 $45,419,180 $776,844 $2,500,000 $4,893,328 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $48,696,024 as % of Original 2015 : as % of Available 2015 : 160.54% 90.87% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 32 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY 11-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $60 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $50 $40 $30 $20 Original $10 $10 5 Year - Trend 15

OKI (CINCINNATI) Original STP $20,617,864 $22,538,388 $18,991,515 $3,185,000 109.31% 0.00% CMAQ** TA $2,061,786 $3,275,821 $3,066,609 $4,461 $204,751 148.95% 9.93% STP Planning - $361,873 - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $22,679,650 $25,814,209 $22,419,997 $4,461 $3,185,000 $204,751 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $25,609,459 as % of Original 2015 : as % of Available 2015 : 112.92% 99.21% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 13 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY 11-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. Millions $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 Original $5 5 Year - Trend 16

SCATS (CANTON) Original STP $4,670,515 $12,498,802 $10,579,741 $1,409,877 $509,184 256.71% 10.90% CMAQ** TA $467,052 $869,084 $809,014 $60,071 173.22% 12.86% STP Planning - - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $5,137,567 $13,367,886 $11,388,755 $1,409,877 $569,254 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $12,798,632 as % of Original 2015 : as % of Available 2015 : 249.12% 95.74% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 5 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY 11-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 Original 5 Year - Trend 17

TMACOG (TOLEDO) Original STP $7,509,135 $9,112,742 $7,755,449 $452,811 $824,482 110.38% 10.98% CMAQ** TA $750,914 $1,314,810 $533,156 $17,629 $764,026 73.35% 101.75% STP Planning - $80,000 - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $8,260,049 $10,427,552 $8,368,605 $17,629 $452,811 $1,588,508 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $8,839,044 as % of Original 2015 : as % of Available 2015 : 107.01% 84.77% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 13 ** See page 10 for more information about the Ohio Statewide Urban CMAQ Committee. SFY 11-14 included CMAQ funding in both the Orignial and chart below. SFY 15 does not include it as it is included under the Statewide CMAQ program. $10 $9 $8 $7 $14 $12 $10 $6 $5 $4 $8 $6 Original $3 $2 $1 $4 $2 5 Year - Trend 18

BEL-O-MAR (BRIDGEPORT) Original STP $403,679 $1,493,629 $1,319,309 $14,768 $159,552 330.48% 39.52% CMAQ $499,140 $2,293,669 $763,600 $22,202 $1,507,866 157.43% 302.09% TA 0.00% 0.00% STP Planning - - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $902,819 $3,787,298 $2,082,909 $36,970 $1,667,419 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $2,119,879 as % of Original 2015 : 234.81% as % of Available 2015 : 55.97% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 6 $2.5 $2.0 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 Original $1.5 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 5 Year - Trend 19

BHJ (STEUBENVILLE) Original STP $622,247 $1,246,229 $1,059,981 $186,248 170.35% 29.93% CMAQ $494,241 $1,296,175 $1,109,145 $97,030 242.62% 19.63% TA $62,225 $15,325 $15,325 24.63% 0.00% STP Planning - - - - - CMAQ Planning - $90,000 - - - - Totals $1,178,713 $2,557,728 $2,274,450 $283,278 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $2,274,450 as % of Original 2015 : 192.96% as % of Available 2015 : 88.92% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 2 $1.4 $1.2 $2.5 $2.0 Original.8.6 $1.5.4.2 5 Year - Trend 20

CCSTCC (SPRINGFIELD) Original STP $1,547,246 $4,263,030 $3,529,033 $733,997 228.08% 47.44% CMAQ $980,790 $1,989,867 $1,428,191 $521,176 149.75% 53.14% TA $154,725 $327,006 $29,361 $297,645 18.98% 192.37% STP Planning - - - - - CMAQ Planning - $40,500 - - - - Totals $2,682,761 $6,579,903 $5,027,085 $1,552,818 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $5,027,085 as % of Original 2015 : 187.38% as % of Available 2015 : 76.40% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 6 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original 5 Year - Trend 21

ERPC (SANDUSKY) Original STP $898,239 $4,243,287 $4,029,117 $214,170 448.56% 23.84% CMAQ - - TA $89,824 $364,827 $246,109 $118,718 273.99% 132.17% STP Planning - - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $988,063 $4,608,114 $4,275,226 $332,888 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $4,275,226 as % of Original 2015 : 432.69% as % of Available 2015 : 92.78% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 5 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $5.0 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original 5 Year - Trend 22

KYOVA (IRONTON) Original STP $494,721 0.00% 0.00% CMAQ $363,919 $421,223 $61,192 $360,032 16.81% 98.93% TA $49,472 $80,000 $40,000 $40,000 80.85% 80.85% STP Planning - - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $908,112 $501,223 $40,000 $61,192 $400,032 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $101,192 as % of Original 2015 : 11.14% as % of Available 2015 : 20.19% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 0.4.4.3.3.2.2 $1.6 $1.4 $1.2.8.6 Original.1.4.1.2 5 Year - Trend 23

LACRPC (LIMA) Original STP $1,122,919 $2,062,112 $1,167,505 $744,607 117.33% 66.31% CMAQ $753,893 $201,106 $198,644 $2,462 26.35% 0.33% TA 0.00% 0.00% STP Planning - $150,000 - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $1,876,812 $2,263,218 $1,516,149 $747,069 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $1,516,149 as % of Original 2015 : 80.78% as % of Available 2015 : 66.99% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 1 $2.5 $2.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.5 Original 5 Year - Trend 24

LCATS (NEWARK) Original STP $1,154,783 $2,166,351 $1,573,489 $60,396 $532,466 141.49% 46.11% CMAQ $952,692 $3,474,906 $379,440 $3,095,466 39.83% 324.92% TA 0.00% 0.00% STP Planning - - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $2,107,475 $5,641,257 $1,952,929 $60,396 $3,627,932 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $2,013,326 as % of Original 2015 : 95.53% as % of Available 2015 : 35.69% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 2 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $6.0 $5.0 $4.0 $3.0 $2.0 Original 5 Year - Trend 25

RCRPC (MANSFIELD) Original STP $1,257,801 $277,065 $197,582 $79,483 15.71% 6.32% CMAQ - - TA $125,780 $27,434 $899 $26,535 0.72% 21.10% STP Planning - - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $1,383,581 $304,499 $198,482 $106,018 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $198,482 as % of Original 2015 : 14.35% as % of Available 2015 : 65.18% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 0.3.3.2.2.1 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original.1 5 Year - Trend 26

WWW (BELPRE-MARIETTA) Original STP $318,267 $625,041 $435,392 $18,156 $151,493 148.79% 47.60% CMAQ $304,454 $276,150 $25,798 $250,352 8.47% 82.23% TA 0.00% 0.00% STP Planning - $20,000 - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $622,721 $901,191 $481,191 $18,156 $401,844 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $499,346 as % of Original 2015 : 80.19% as % of Available 2015 : 55.41% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 3.7.6.8.7.6.4.3.2.1.4.3.2.1 Original 5 Year - Trend 27

FINDLAY Original STP $602,491 $926,101 $926,101 153.71% 0.00% CMAQ TA STP Planning - - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $602,491 $926,101 $926,101 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $926,101 as % of Original 2015 : 153.71% as % of Available 2015 : 100.00% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 1.9.8.7.6.4.7.6.4.3 Original.3.2.1.2.1 5 Year - Trend 28

LANCASTER Original STP $567,075 $1,706,713 $1,328,043 $32,033 $133,972 $212,666 263.47% 37.50% CMAQ TA STP Planning - - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $567,075 $1,706,713 $1,328,043 $32,033 $133,972 $212,666 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $1,494,047 as % of Original 2015 : 263.47% as % of Available 2015 : 87.54% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 1 $1.8 $1.6 $1.4 $1.2.8.6 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original.4.2 5 Year - Trend 29

MARION Original STP $538,663 $220,003 $185,650 $34,353 34.46% 6.38% CMAQ TA STP Planning - - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $538,663 $220,003 $185,650 $34,353 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $185,650 as % of Original 2015 : 34.46% as % of Available 2015 : 84.39% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 1.3 $3.0.2.2.1 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 Original.1 5 Year - Trend 30

WOOSTER Original STP $381,935 $591,085 $448,260 $142,825 117.37% 37.40% CMAQ TA STP Planning - - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $381,935 $591,085 $448,260 $142,825 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $448,260 as % of Original 2015 : 117.37% as % of Available 2015 : 75.84% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 2.7.6.4.4.4.3.3.3.2.2.1.2.1.1 Original SFY 12 SFY 13 SFY 14 SFY 15 5 Year - Trend 31

ZANESVILLE Original STP $372,693 $600,163 $37,528 $562,635 10.07% 150.96% CMAQ TA STP Planning - - - - - CMAQ Planning - - - - - Totals $372,693 $600,163 $37,528 $562,635 Total 2015 Encumbrances and : $37,528 as % of Original 2015 : 10.07% as % of Available 2015 : 6.25% Construction Contracts Awarded in SFY 2015: 0.7.6.4.3.2.1 $1.8 $1.6 $1.4 $1.2.8.6.4.2 Original 5 Year - Trend 32

DEFINITIONS ORIGINAL BUDGET ALLOCATION: The total new budget allocated by to Ohio s MPOs and large cities in SFY 2015. AVAILABLE 2015 BUDGET: The available SFY 2015 budget is a component of the original budget allocation and accumulated carry forward budgets from previous years. Available budget also reflects program budget trades, which are transfers of budget between programs or between MPOs, to be repaid in a later fiscal year. ENCUMBERED: totals are those that have been recorded in s accounting system in SFY 2015. UNENCUMBERED EXPENDITURES: that are not recorded as encumbrances in s accounting system due to the nature of the expenditure. There are three types of unencumbered expenditures: LET CE: expenditures for staff construction engineering labor costs on let projects. PAYMENT: expenditures made to pay back previously secured loans. TRANSFER: FHWA funding that is transferred to for financing of Regional Transit Authority projects. 15 CARRY FORWARD: Accumulated carry forward budgets that will roll into SFY 2016. The carry forward totals are the difference between the available SFY 2015 budgets, and the encumbrances and unencumbered expenditures that took place in SFY 2015. % ORIGINAL ALLOCATION EXPENDED: ( + Unencumbered ) Original SFY 2015 % ORIGINAL ALLOCATION CARRIED FORWARD: SFY 2015 Original SFY 2015 33