Officer Jamie L, Rhee Y 31,2015 Y 31, By Order of the Chief Procurement Officer: Signed: chi. Published: Effective: Date:

Similar documents
EL DORADO COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UDBE GOOD FAITH EFFORT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION AUGUST 19, 2010

ADDENDUM NO. 01 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NO CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK (CMAR)- CNG FUELING INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES

APPENDIX H DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE REQUIREMENTS

SPECIAL PROVISION Disadvantaged Business Enterprise in Federal Aid Contracts

Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

Illinois State Toll Highway Authority SPECIAL PROVISION FOR DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PARTICIPATION

Attachment E DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE REQUIREMENTS

Special Provision to Item 000 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise in Federal Aid Contracts

ONONDAGA COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY MINORITY AND WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE POLICY

Fayette County Public Schools. Supplier Diversity Program Contract Forms

Programs TARGET MARKET PROGRAM...3 SMALL BUSINESS INITIATIVE...3

SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (SBE) SPECIAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS

Request for Proposal. To Provide Custodial Bank Services For The Milwaukee County Stabilization Fund Trust

FAQs Title 74, Section 303 and PennDOT s Diverse Business Participation Program

DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS PRE- AWARD REQUIREMENTS

Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTS DEPT. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

Part A: PRIME CONTRACTOR PROJECT SUMMARY FORM

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Special Provisions

Target Market Professional Services Master Consulting Agreements MBE/WBE SPECIAL CONDITIONS

Program Guide for DBEs & Prime Contractors

REQUIRED CONTRACT PROVISION FEDERAL AID CONTRACTS UTILIZATION OF DISADVANTAGED BUSINESSES

CHAPTER 57 ARTICLES II & III

Operational Procedure: Section TABLE OF CONTENTS

Commercial Non-Discrimination and Columbia Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (CDBE) Utilization Policy (Last Revised: November, 2016)

SPECIAL CONDITIONS REGARDING MINORITY OWNED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE AND WOMEN OWNED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE FOR WORK SERVICES

DBE Program Goal Setting and Good Faith Efforts. November 2010 Shay Ponquinette Assistant Division Administrator Civil Rights Division

TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE. I Application 1. II Minority Business Enterprise Goals 1. III Subcontractor Payment Requirements 2

DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE

PART IV UTILIZATION OF DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES AND SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS

B. B.E.P.D. means an entity certified as a Business enterprise owned or operated by people with disabilities as defined in MCC

DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DESIGN, CODE AND CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT ADDENDUM NO. 01 FOR

STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE MAY 20, 2015

METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT BUSINESS DIVERSITY. MWBE Utilization and Workforce Program Construction Projects with Federal Funding

SPECIAL CONDITIONS REGARDING MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE COMMITMENT AND WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE COMMITMENT FOR MBE/WBE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

CHAPTER 57 ARTICLES II & III

SDDOT CONSTRUCTION MANUAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT SECTION CHAPTER 5 DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) TABLE OF CONTENTS. Regulation and Authority 5-2

ATTACHMENT H MBE FORMS A-E MARYLAND JUDICIARY (MJUD) CERTIFIED MBE UTILIZATION AND FAIR SOLICITATION AFFIDAVIT MBE FORM A

a00014 CHANGES TO SPECIFICATIONS: APPENDIX C DSP4 Provision Name:

OFFICE OF STATE AID ROAD CONSTRUCTION MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Procurement Enhancement Program Policies and Procedures Manual Contract Compliance measures

CALTRANS DBE/ UDBE REQUIREMENTS

This project is subject to Title 49, Part 26.13(b), Code of Federal Regulations [49 CFR 26.13(b)]:

PALM BEACH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS

METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT BUSINESS DIVERSITY. MBE Utilization and Workforce Program Building Construction Projects

CARROLL COUNTY CARROLL COUNTY DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE POLICY

GUIDE TO BID INCENTIVES AND PROGRAMS

This project is subject to Title 49, Part 26.13(b), Code of Federal Regulations [49 CFR 26.13(b)]:

ATTACHMENT B DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE UTILIZATION

SPECIAL PROVISION Disadvantaged Business Enterprise in Federal-Aid Construction

SPECIAL PROVISION. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise in State Funded Construction

HOUSE BILL lr2874 A BILL ENTITLED. Procurement Minority Business Enterprise Program Policy Statements

INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

REINFORCING ROD FORMED STEEL CAGES, STEEL GROUNDING RODS AND STEEL ANCHOR RODS

Federal and State Grant Procurements. Procurement and Contracts Division

CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION MIDWAY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TERMINAL FRONT ENTRY REPLACEMENT AND CURBFRONT IMPROVEMENTS

NOTICE OF INVITATION FOR BID

MAY 17, 2017 ADDENDUM NO. 4 FOR

PART 6B. JACKSONVILLE SMALL EMERGING BUSINESS PROGRAM. Sec [Percentage of work to be accomplished by JSEBs.]

Mecklenburg County Minority, Women, and Small Business Enterprise Provisions

DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DESIGN, CODE AND CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS STATEMENTS FOR

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF MILWAUKEE (HACM)

Regional Urban Water Augmentation Project CIP #RW-0156 Document Marina Coast Water District DBE GOOD FAITH EFFORT VERIFICATION

MWBE Utilization and Workforce Program Construction Projects with Federal Funding

ALL AGENCY SERVICE CONTRACT PROCUREMENT GUIDELINES Adopted by the Board on March 21, 2018

DALLAS FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ADDENDUM NO. 3. Terminal B & E Passenger Boarding Bridge Replacement Gates B9, B26, E31, E34

ORDINANCE NO

DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM INFORMATION FOR BIDDERS

PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION

Draft Minority/Women Business Enterprise Plan

ORDINANCE NO N.S.

PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION

CITY OF TACOMA SMALL WORKS ROSTER PROGRAM FOR PUBLIC WORKS AND IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTS

Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: SBE POLICY ON CONSTRUCTION CHAPTER 2: SBE PROGRAM ON CONSTRUCTION I. DEFINITIONS...

TIRE RECYCLING AND DISPOSAL SERVICES

DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DESIGN, CODE AND CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT

PN /21/ DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) UTILIZATION PLAN AND GOOD FAITH EFFORTS For LPA PROJECTS- Effective 09/25/2017

Liquid Blended Phosphate and Phosphoric Acid

These regulations are issued pursuant to the following Sections of the Municipal Code of Chicago:

DBE MAWSS Disadvantage Business Enterprise Policy For Public Works Act Contracts

SPECIAL PROVISION. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise/Historically Underutilized. in State Funded Construction

APPENDIX 5 - The Agreement RFB Documents Page 1 of 105 CONTRACT AGREEMENT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL: 8/25/2012 NUMBER OF COPIES TO SUBMIT: TWO (2) Page 1

PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION. Reference No

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER

Procurements by states General procurement standards.

MANUAL OF PROCEDURE. Small Local Business Enterprises Initiative Incentives

REQUIRED CONTRACT PROVISION FEDERAL AID CONTRACTS UTILIZATION OF DISADVANTAGED BUSINESSES

I. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR THE SMALL BUSINESS INITIATIVE CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

Alameda County Transportation Commission SAMPLE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE LANGUAGE: CONSTRUCTION

Maintenance, Repair, Replacement, and Installation of Uninterrupted Power System (UPS) and Power Distribution and Control Systems

SAN DIEGO CONVENTION CENTER CORPORATION

MAYOR S OFFICE OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY CLEVELAND AREA BUSINESS CODE NOTICE TO BIDDERS & SCHEDULES

Parts and Repair Services for Caterpillar Engines (Group B Re-Bid) Specification Number: A RFQ Number: 95301

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise in Federal-Aid Construction for Non-Traditional Contracts

PORT OF OAKLAND NON-DISCRIMINATION AND SMALL LOCAL BUSINESS UTILIZATION POLICY

CHAPTER 6 MINORITY AND WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM AND OTHER CONTRACTING PROCEDURES

Printing of Signs No Parking-Street Cleaning

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEBARMENT AND/OR SUSPENSION POLICY

REQUEST TO SUBMIT PROPOSALS FOR ASBESTOS SURVEYOR FOR THE CITY OF PONTIAC

Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) and Minority/Women Business Enterprise (M/WBE) Policy and Procedures Business Diversity & Development Department

Transcription:

DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH EFFORTS REGARDING MBE/WBE/DBE PARTICIPATION AT CONTRACT CLOSE-OUT UNDER 2-92-450 AND 2-92-740 LAST UPDATED: JULY 31, 2015 Mayor Rahm Emanuel Chief Procurement Officer Jamie L. Rhee

BY AUTHORITY VESTED IN THE CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT SERVICES PURSUANT TO2.92.450 AND 2.92.740, THE FOLLOWING RULES REGARDING DETERMINATION OF"GOOD F'AITH EF'F''ORTS REGARDING MBE/WBE/DBE PARTICIPATION AT CONTRACT CLOSE.OUT ARE ADOPTED HEREIN. By Order of the Chief Procurement Officer: Signed: chi Officer Jamie L, Rhee Date: Published: Effective: Y 31,2015 Y 31, 2015

REGULATIONS REGARDING THE DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH EFFORTS REGARDING MBE/WBE/DBE PARTICIPATION AT CONTRACT CLOSE-OUT Pursuant to Section 2-92-450 of the Municipal Code of Chicago, the Chief Procurement Officer ( CPO ) is required to issue rules setting forth the standards to be used in determining whether or not to grant a contractor s request for waiver of MBE and/or WBE participation commitments. In addition, under Section 2-92-740 of the Municipal Code of Chicago, if the CPO determines that a contractor has failed to make good faith efforts to fulfill its MBE and/or WBE goals on a City construction contract, the CPO may impose remedies or sanctions upon that contractor. General Rule A contractor shall not be entitled to a reduction or waiver of MBE or WBE goals during the performance of the contract, or after substantial completion of the contract at the time of contract close-out, unless the contractor, by a written request to the CPO for reduction or waiver of its MBE or WBE goals, can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the CPO that it has made good faith efforts to meet its MBE and WBE utilization goals. Scope of Rule The rules promulgated below set forth the process for contract close-out and the basis upon which the CPO will determine if a contractor has made good faith efforts sufficient to allow a waiver or reduction of its MBE and/or WBE participation commitments on both the City s construction and non-construction contracts. THE CLOSE-OUT PROCESS A B C Prior to contract close-out, the City shall submit to the contractor a preliminary report of the contractor s MBE and WBE participation rates based on the contractor s prior submissions. The preliminary report shall notify the contractor of any shortfall(s) in its MBE and/or WBE participation commitments. If, after receipt of this preliminary report, the contractor wishes to obtain a reduction or waiver of its MBE and/or WBE participation goals, it must, within 10 business days of receipt of the preliminary report, file a written request for such reduction or waiver with the CPO, providing sufficient documentation to show that it made good faith efforts to comply with its MBE and/or WBE participation commitments as evidenced by the contractor s compliance with the factors specified below. Reasonable extensions to the 10 business day response time may be granted if made in writing prior to the expiration of the first 10 business day period. The CPO will utilize the factors listed below to determine if the contractor made good faith efforts to meet its MBE and WBE utilization goals. The CPO will take into consideration any information submitted by the contractor in response to the preliminary report and will render a final written decision regarding any MBE and/or WBE reduction or waiver request after a final report of the contractor s MBE and WBE participation rates has been completed. Requests for Reconsideration of a final determination may be submitted to the CPO if: 1. Information becomes available that was not previously known; or 2. The CPO s decision contains an error of law or regulation.

D If the contractor s waiver request is denied, and the contractor disagrees with the CPO s determination that it did not make good faith efforts to meet its MBE and/or WBE commitments and wishes to appeal, the contractor shall have fifteen (15) days after receipt of the CPO s final decision to submit to the CPO a written request for a hearing to be conducted by the City s Department of Administrative Hearings. Upon receipt of a timely hearing request, the City shall institute an action with the Department of Administrative Hearings, which shall appoint an administrative law officer who shall conduct a hearing on the contractor s MBE and/or WBE reduction or waiver request within thirty (30) days of receiving the request. DETERMINING GOOD FAITH EFFORTS IN CONTRACTS WITH MBE/WBE PARTICIPATION FOR CONTRACT CLOSE OUT A In evaluating whether the contractor has made such good faith efforts, the CPO, or his or her designee, shall consider, if there is evidence, that during the course of the project, the contractor was: 1 Soliciting through reasonable and available means the interest of Citycertified MBEs or WBEs that have the capability to perform the work of the contract. The contractor must solicit this interest within sufficient time to allow the MBEs or WBEs to respond. The contractor must take appropriate steps to follow up initial solicitations with interested MBEs or WBEs. 2 Providing interested MBEs or WBEs with adequate information about the plans, specifications and requirements of the contract, including addenda, in a timely manner to assist them in responding to the solicitation. 3 Negotiating in good faith with interested MBEs or WBEs that have submitted bids. Documentation of negotiation must include the names, addresses and telephone numbers of MBEs or WBEs that were solicited; the date of each such solicitation; a description of the information provided regarding the plans and specifications for the work selected for subcontracting; and evidence as to why agreements could not be reached with MBEs or WBEs to perform the work. That there may be some additional costs involved in soliciting and using MBEs and WBEs is not a sufficient reason for a contractor s failure to meet the goals, as long as such costs are reasonable. 4 Not rejecting MBEs or WBEs as being unqualified without sound reasons based on a thorough investigation of their capabilities. The MBEs or WBEs standing within its industry, membership in specific groups, organizations, or associations, and political or social affiliations are not legitimate causes for rejecting or not soliciting bids to meet the goals. 5 Making a portion of the work available to MBE or WBE subcontractors and suppliers and selecting the portions of the work or material consistent with the available MBE or WBE subcontractors and suppliers, so as to facilitate meeting the goals. 6 Making good faith efforts to utilize MBEs and WBEs, despite the ability or desire of a contractor to perform the work of a contract with its own organization.

A contractor who desires to self-perform the work of a contract must demonstrate good faith efforts unless the goals have been met. 7. Selecting portions of the work to be performed by MBEs or WBEs in order to increase the likelihood that the goals will be met. This includes, where appropriate, breaking out contract work items into economically feasible units to facilitate MBE or WBE participation, even when the contractor might otherwise prefer to perform these work items with its own forces. 8. Making efforts to assist interested MBEs or WBEs in obtaining bonding, lines of credit or insurance as required by the City or contractor. 9. Making efforts to assist interested MBEs or WBEs in obtaining necessary equipment, supplies, materials or related assistance or services, including participation in a City-sponsored mentor-protégée program. 10. Effectively using the services of the City; minority or women community organizations; minority or women contractors groups; local, state and federal minority or women business assistance offices; and other organizations to provide assistance in the recruitment and placement of MBEs or WBEs. 11. Affected by City action that caused the shortfall (e.g., a change in the scope of work that eliminated MBE/WBE budget line items, or an increase in the scope of work covered by line items being performed by non-mbe/non-wbe contractors; a change in specifications). 12. Unable to obtain MBE or WBE participation without requiring the introduction of extra participants not performing a commercially useful function. 13. Making efforts to utilize the Department of Procurement Services M/WBE forum for purposes of advertising subcontracting opportunities appropriate for MBEs and WBEs. The M/WBE forum is located at: https://webapps.cityofchicago.org/mwbeforum/forums/list.page. DETERMINING GOOD FAITH EFFORTS IN CONTRACTS WITH DBE PARTICIPATION FOR CONTRACT CLOSEOUT In evaluating whether the contractor has made such good faith efforts on federallyfunded projects that provide for goals for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises, the CPO, or his or her designee, shall consider the factors contained in 49 CFR 26 Appendix A Guidance Concerning Good Faith Efforts, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Appendix A to Part 26 -- Guidance Concerning Good Faith Efforts I. When, as a recipient, you establish a contract goal on a DOT-assisted contract, a bidder must, in order to be responsible and/or responsive, make good faith efforts to meet the goal. The bidder can meet this requirement in either of two ways. First, the bidder can meet the goal, documenting commitments for participation by DBE firms sufficient for this purpose. Second, even if it doesn't meet the goal, the bidder can document adequate good faith efforts. This means that the bidder must show that it took all necessary and reasonable steps to achieve a DBE goal or other requirement of this part which, by their scope, intensity, and appropriateness to the objective, could reasonably be expected to obtain sufficient DBE participation, even if they were not fully successful. II. In any situation in which you have established a contract goal, part 26 requires you to use the good faith efforts mechanism of this part. As a recipient, it is up to you to make a fair and reasonable judgment whether a bidder that did not meet the goal made adequate good faith efforts. It is important for you to consider the quality, quantity, and intensity of the different kinds of efforts that the bidder has made. The efforts employed by the bidder should be those that one could reasonably expect a bidder to take if the bidder were actively and aggressively trying to obtain DBE participation sufficient to meet the DBE contract goal. Mere pro forma efforts are not good faith efforts to meet the DBE contract requirements. We emphasize, however, that your determination concerning the sufficiency of the firm's good faith efforts is a judgment call: meeting quantitative formulas is not required. III. The Department also strongly cautions you against requiring that a bidder meet a contract goal (i.e., obtain a specified amount of DBE participation) in order to be awarded a contract, even though the bidder makes an adequate good faith efforts showing. This rule specifically prohibits you from ignoring bona fide good faith efforts. IV. The following is a list of types of actions which you should consider as part of the bidder's good faith efforts to obtain DBE participation. It is not intended to be a mandatory checklist, nor is it intended to be exclusive or exhaustive. Other factors or types of efforts may be relevant in appropriate cases. A. Soliciting through all reasonable and available means (e.g. attendance at pre-bid meetings, advertising and/or written notices) the interest of all certified DBEs who have the capability to perform the work of the contract. The bidder must solicit this interest within sufficient time to allow the DBEs to respond to the solicitation. The bidder must determine with certainty if the DBEs are interested by taking appropriate steps to follow up initial solicitations. B. Selecting portions of the work to be performed by DBEs in order to increase the likelihood that the DBE goals will be achieved. This includes, where appropriate, breaking out contract work items into economically feasible units to facilitate DBE participation, even when the prime contractor might otherwise prefer to perform these work items with its own forces. C. Providing interested DBEs with adequate information about the plans, specifications, and requirements of the contract in a timely manner to assist them in responding to a solicitation. D. 1. (1) Negotiating in good faith with interested DBEs. It is the bidder's responsibility to make a portion of the work available to DBE subcontractors and suppliers and to select those portions of the work or material needs consistent with the available DBE

subcontractors and suppliers, so as to facilitate DBE participation. Evidence of such negotiation includes the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of DBEs that were considered; a description of the information provided regarding the plans and specifications for the work selected for subcontracting; and evidence as to why additional agreements could not be reached for DBEs to perform the work. 2. A bidder using good business judgment would consider a number of factors in negotiating with subcontractors, including DBE subcontractors, and would take a firm's price and capabilities as well as contract goals into consideration. However, the fact that there may be some additional costs involved in finding and using DBEs is not in itself sufficient reason for a bidder's failure to meet the contract DBE goal, as long as such costs are reasonable. Also, the ability or desire of a prime contractor to perform the work of a contract with its own organization does not relieve the bidder of the responsibility to make good faith efforts. Prime contractors are not, however, required to accept higher quotes from DBEs if the price difference is excessive or unreasonable. E. Not rejecting DBEs as being unqualified without sound reasons based on a thorough investigation of their capabilities. The contractor's standing within its industry, membership in specific groups, organizations, or associations and political or social affiliations (for example union vs. nonunion employee status) are not legitimate causes for the rejection or nonsolicitation of bids in the contractor's efforts to meet the project goal. F. Making efforts to assist interested DBEs in obtaining bonding, lines of credit, or insurance as required by the recipient or contractor. G. Making efforts to assist interested DBEs in obtaining necessary equipment, supplies, materials, or related assistance or services. H. Effectively using the services of available minority/women community organizations; minority/women contractors' groups; local, state, and Federal minority/women business assistance offices; and other organizations as allowed on a case-by-case basis to provide assistance in the recruitment and placement of DBEs. V. In determining whether a bidder has made good faith efforts, you may take into account the performance of other bidders in meeting the contract. For example, when the apparent successful bidder fails to meet the contract goal, but others meet it, you may reasonably raise the question of whether, with additional reasonable efforts, the apparent successful bidder could have met the goal. If the apparent successful bidder fails to meet the goal, but meets or exceeds the average DBE participation obtained by other bidders, you may view this, in conjunction with other factors, as evidence of the apparent successful bidder having made good faith efforts.