Hong Kong Proposes Rules to Combat Backdoor Listing - Part 2

Similar documents
Hong Kong Proposes Changes to Attract Listing of Innovative Companies on the Main Board

New Ways to Use Your Offshore RMB: MOFCOM and PBoC Join Hands to Put Finishing Touches on RMB FDI Rules

The Government Consults on Subsidiary Legislation for Implementation of the new Companies Ordinance Phase One

Pension Scheme Governance for Trustees Programme

Complying with the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (Cap. 486) in the insurance industry

Pensions Legal Update

Debtor in Possession Financing in Asia - Considerations for Financial Institutions

The legal form of a European Stock Corporation is an interesting alternative for mid-sized partnerships and also for large corporations.

Private Equity Portfolio Company Bulletin

Recent Developments in the Regulation of RMB Funds

Pensions Legal Update

The Volcker Rule: Implication for Private Fund Activities

Takeover Code changes published - is this a new era for UK takeovers?

Enhanced Antitrust Enforcement Expected in China as Long-awaited Anti-Monopoly Implementing Rules Finalised

Vietnam Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A)

The Volcker Rule: Proprietary Trading and Private Fund Restrictions

Significant Revisions to US International Tax Rules

Practice Overview. Global Employment & Benefits

SEC Adopts Final Rules Related to Representation and Warranties in Asset-Backed Securities Offerings

Charltons. Hong Kong. July HKEx Consults on Tightened HKEx Listing Rules on Backdoor Listings and Shell Companies. 1. Introduction SOLICITORS

US SEC Amends Custody Rule for Registered Investment Advisers

US Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service Issue Supplementary FATCA Guidance

Pensions Legal Update

Recent Developments in the Regulation of RMB Funds

Hong Kong Capital Markets Update

Global Corporate Insurance and Regulatory Bulletin INSURANCE & REINSURANCE INDUSTRY GROUP

Summary of Government Interventions in Financial Markets European Central Bank (and the Eurosystem)

Lending to Single Investor Funds: Issues in Connection with Subscription Credit Facilities

Energy Tax Provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

Corporate & Securities update

Insurance & Reinsurance Industry Group: Corporate Insurance & Regulatory Bulletin London

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II

Spring 2015 reforms: DC governance and charging

US IRS Issues Preliminary FATCA Guidance Establishing Due Diligence Procedures and Information Reporting Rules for Foreign Financial Institutions

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II

Summary of Government Interventions in Financial Markets Sweden

Sun Capital Update: US Private Equity Funds Liable for Multiemployer Plan Withdrawal Liability of Portfolio Company

The IRS and Treasury Issue New Anti-Inversion Notice

MiFID II 18 January MiFID II

Summary of Government Interventions in Financial Markets Luxembourg

Summary of Government Interventions in Financial Markets Greece

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II

Firms will be required to appoint a single officer with specific responsibility for client assets

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES

Proposed Revisions to SEC Cross Border Tender Offer, Exchange Offer and Business Combination Rules

Insurance & Reinsurance Industry Group: Corporate Insurance & Regulatory Bulletin London

China Antitrust Moves Up a Gear

Arbitrability of IP Disputes in Russia

US SEC Proxy Access Proposal

Capital markets update

June 2018 CONSULTATION PAPER BACKDOOR LISTING, CONTINUING LISTING CRITERIA AND OTHER RULE AMENDMENTS

Directors duties under the Companies Act An introduction

Bankers Bonus Cap: Where Are We Now?

Every cent counts: China slashes certain IP application fees. April 2017

New Rules Released: Senior Managers and Certification Regime Extended to All Firms

Antitrust & Competition

FATCA Transitional Rules Extended

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II

Summary of Government Interventions in Financial Markets Denmark

Supply Chain Finance Primer

What financial information must be presented in interactive form?

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II. Third country access

MiFID II. Inducements. Key Points

MiFID II Best execution and client order handling

Spring 2015 reforms: other changes

Capital Markets Implications of Amendments to Simplify and Update SEC Disclosure Rules

Paperwork Initiative: IRS Notice Previews of Life Settlement Reporting Rules

Malaysia The Resurrection of Sales and Services Tax

New listing regime proposals for emerging and innovative companies

The IRS and Treasury Issue New Anti-Inversion Guidance

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II

Spring 2015 reforms: the new DC flexibilities

Understanding the SEC s Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule and its Implications

Fund of Funds Financing: Secondary Facilities for PE Funds and Hedge Funds

Six Things Every Purchaser of US Commercial Accounts Receivable Should Know

Poland: The Regulations, Permits and Considerations

VA Guaranty for Non-Cash-Out Refinancings Subject to New Conditions in Senate Banking Bill

Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Net Operating Loss Poison Pill

Changes to Hedge Fund Disclosure and Reporting Obligations

MiFID II Information to clients on costs and charges

Beginner s Glossary to Fund Finance

National Regulatory System Proposed for US Insurance Industry

Capital Commitment Subscription Facilities and the Proposed Liquidity Coverage Ratio

The Impact of the EU Securitization Regulation on US Entities

Contents. Introduction 4. Directors conflicts duties 4. What is a conflict? 5. Who can authorise? 6. Authorising conflicts 7

Trustee Quarterly Review

Joint Report Signals Post-Brexit Reciprocal Protection for EU and UK Citizens

Treasury and IRS Re-Release Proposed Regulations on Implementation of New Centralized Partnership Audit Regime

Derivatives: trade execution

Rough waters ahead: Non-Performing Shipping Loans solutions are available

Legal Update September 21, 2011

United States and European Union Reach a Covered Agreement on Cross-Border Insurance and Reinsurance

The Drama Continues: Senate Finance Committee Chairman s Mark includes Proposals That Would Dramatically Impact Executive Compensation Programs

The Act Amending the Right of Inquiry

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II. Derivatives: trade execution

IRS and Treasury Issue Long-Awaited Guidance on Corporate Inversions and Disqualified Stock

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II. Information to clients on costs and charges

Our Capabilities in Asia

Why a Hanjin Fleet Came to Hong Kong

MiFID II March MiFID II

Transcription:

Legal Update Hong Kong 13 July 2018 Hong Kong Proposes Rules to Combat Backdoor Listing - Part 2 To address concerns about backdoor listings and shell activities in Hong Kong, the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (HKSE) recently published (i) a consultation paper proposing to tighten the Listing Rules on reverse takeover, continuing listing criteria and others (the Consultation Proposals); and (ii) a guidance letter on listed issuer s suitability for continued listing (GL96-18). We have examined the new guidance letter GL96-18 in our earlier Update and we will discuss HKSE s Consultation Proposals in this article. Consultation Proposals at a Glance In curbing recent increase in the trading and the creation of shell companies, the Consultation Proposals seek to amend the Hong Kong Listing Rules in the following areas: ENHANCING CONTINUING LISTING CRITERIA TO DETER SHELLS ACTIVITIES, 12-MONTH TRANSITION i FOR COMPLIANCE Sufficient operations issuer must carry out a business with a sufficient level of operations and (previously or ) have assets of sufficient value to support its operations to warrant its continued listing Cash Companies issuer (other than investment company ) may be regarded as not suitable for listing if assets consist wholly or substantially ii of cash and/or short-term investments, which definition is extended to include investments readily realisable or convertible to cash; listed securities; bonds, bills or notes of less than one year to maturity; and advances to third parties (save for trade receivables in ordinary course of business) repayable within one year TIGHTENING THE TRANSACTIONS UNDER THE PROVISIONS TO DETER CIRCUMVENTION OF NEW LISTING REQUIREMENTS TO REGULATE BACKDOOR LISTING, NO TRANSITION PERIOD Reverse takeovers (RTO) the six principle-based test assessment criteria set out in guidance letter GL78-14 iii codified with modifications transactions/arrangements (proposed and/or completed) in reasonable proximity or otherwise related within a three-year period deemed as a series of arrangements aggregation period under the bright-line test extended from 24 months to 36 months deemed new listing both acquisition targets and enlarged group suitable for listing Please see below further discussion on RTO Rules

Extreme transactions the extreme very substantial acquisition requirements under guidance letter GL78-14 iii codified with modifications Extreme Transaction rules (new requirements) apply if issuer under same control for not less than three years and the transaction would not result in change in control OR issuer operating a principal business with substantial size (with annual revenue or total asset value of HK$1billion or more) after the transaction(s) both acquisition targets and enlarged group suitable for listing appointment of financial adviser who is required to conduct due diligence on target(s) and submit a declaration Please see below further discussion on Extreme Transactions Restriction on disposals no material disposal (or distribution in specie) of existing business at the time of or within 36 months after a change in control, unless the remaining group or the assets acquired from incoming shareholder meet the new listing requirements HKSE may apply this rule to a material disposal where there is a proposed or intended change in the single largest substantial shareholder Large scale issue of securities a large scale issue of securities for cash to acquire and/or develop a new business iv may be considered as a means to circumvent new listing requirements (normally not applicable if less than half (50%) of the issuer s assets would consist of cash as a result of the issue) ENHANCING RULES FOR BETTER PROTECTION OF INVESTORS, NO TRANSITION PERIOD Significant distribution in specie significant distributions in specie of unlisted assets (amounting to a very substantial disposal) must be approved by independent shareholders (controlling shareholders and their respective associates abstaining from voting) with at least 75% of the votes for and not more than 10% of the votes against the resolution a reasonable cash alternative should be offered Securities transactions securities transactions not considered of a revenue nature unless carried out by group members that are subject to the supervision of prudential regulators (i.e. banking company, insurance company or securities house) details of each securities investment representing 5% or more of issuer s total assets must be disclosed in annual reports Financial performance guarantee acquired mandatory disclosure on any subsequent change (by way of announcement) and the outcome (in annual report) of any financial performance guarantee of a target acquired by issuer in a notifiable or connected transaction i. Transition period commences from the effective date of the amendment. ii. The expression of wholly or substantially is understood as meaning in the main or as of the greater part. A company with less than half (50%) of its assets being cash as a result of a fundraising would not normally be regarded to have assets consisting wholly or substantially of cash. See HKSE s guidance letter GL84-15. iii. See HKSE s guidance letter GL78-14. iv. The proposed rule would apply where funds raised are used to develop a new business through future acquisitions, in addition to greenfield operations as described in HKSE s guidance letter GL84-15, which will remain as guidance to explain circumstances under which HKSE would apply the restriction. 2 Mayer Brown JSM Hong Kong Proposes Rules to Combat Backdoor Listing - Part 2

The Revised RTO Rules and Extreme Transaction Rules We set out below in the form of a flowchart our analysis of the possible application of the revised rules on RTO and Extreme Transactions from a reading of the Consultation Proposals. This is not a substitute for a formal advise. meet Bright-line test 1 caught by one or more Principlebased test assessment cirteria 2 transaction(s) 3 have effect of listing of target(s) an attempt to circumvent new listing requirements both acquisition target(s) and enlarged group suitable for listing 4 no change in control 5 / principal business with substantial size 6 remains Listing Committee to determine whether Extreme Transaction tifiable Transaction Rules apply NO GO Extreme Transaction Rules apply RTO Rules apply - deemed new listing NOTES 1. The bright line test refers to two specific forms of RTOs: (a) an acquisition (or a series of acquisitions) of assets constituting a very substantial acquisition involving a change in control; or (b) very substantial acquisition(s) of assets (individually or in aggregate) from the new controlling shareholder and its associates within 36 months following a change in control. 2. The principle based test gives HKSE broad discretion to deem an acquisition to be a new listing if, in the opinion of HKSE such acquisition constitutes an attempt to achieve a listing of the assets to be acquired and a means to circumvent the new listing requirements. A new assessment criterion is proposed to replace the current issue of restricted convertible securities criterion, namely any change in control or de facto control of issuer after taking into account: i. any substantial change in the board and key management; ii. any change in single largest substantial shareholder; and 3 Mayer Brown JSM Hong Kong Proposes Rules to Combat Backdoor Listing - Part 2

iii. any issue of restricted convertible securities (with a conversion restriction mechanism to avoid triggering a change in control under the Takeovers Code) to vendor as acquisition consideration. Other assessment criteria remain unchanged including: a. size of the acquisition targets relative to that of issuer; b. nature and scale of issuer s business; c. any fundamental change in issuer s principal business; d. quality of the acquisition targets; and/or e. any series of arrangements (historical, proposed or intended) within a three-year period to list the acquisition targets. 3. HKSE may regard acquisitions and other transactions or arrangements (proposed or completed) as a series if they take place in a reasonable proximity to each other (which normally refers to a period of three years or less) or are otherwise related. 4. For a RTO or Extreme Transaction, both the acquisition targets and the enlarged group must be suitable for listing; the acquisition targets (and in certain RTO, each target) must meet the track record requirement; and the enlarged group must meet all the new listing requirements. Waiver from management/ownership continuity requirement may be granted in certain Extreme Transactions. 5. Issuer must demonstrate that it has been under the control of a large business enterprise for not less than three years, and the transaction forms part of a business restructuring and would not result in a change in control. 6. The Extreme Transaction classification would not be available if issuer demonstrates shell like characteristics. As general guidance, a principal business with substantial size may include a principal business with annual revenue or total asset value of HK$1 billion or more, excluding any revenue or assets not attributable to issuer s original principal business e.g. any significant investments or surplus cash, and any revenue or assets attributed to a newly acquired or developed business. 4 Mayer Brown JSM Hong Kong Proposes Rules to Combat Backdoor Listing - Part 2

Contact Us For inquiries related to this Legal Update, please contact the following persons or your usual contacts with our firm. Jacqueline Chiu T: +852 2843 2447 E: jacqueline.chiu@mayerbrownjsm.com Jeckle Chiu T: +852 2843 2245 E: jeckle.chiu@mayerbrownjsm.com Chester Wong T: +852 2843 4273 E: chester.wong@mayerbrownjsm.com Mayer Brown JSM is part of Mayer Brown, a global legal services organisation, advising many of the world s largest companies, including a significant proportion of the Fortune 100, FTSE 100, CAC 40, DAX, Hang Seng and Nikkei index companies and more than half of the world s largest banks. Our legal services include banking and finance; corporate and securities; litigation and dispute resolution; antitrust and competition; employment and benefits; environmental; financial services regulatory and enforcement; government and global trade; intellectual property; real estate; tax; restructuring, bankruptcy and insolvency; and private clients, trusts and estates. OFFICE LOCATIONS AMERICAS: Charlotte, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, Mexico City, New York, Palo Alto, San Francisco, Washington DC ASIA: Bangkok, Beijing, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Singapore, Tokyo EUROPE: Brussels, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, London, Paris MIDDLE EAST: Dubai TAUIL & CHEQUER ADVOGADOS in association with Mayer Brown LLP: Brasília, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo Please visit www.mayerbrownjsm.com for comprehensive contact information for all our offices. This publication provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest to our clients and friends. The foregoing is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and is not intended to provide legal advice or be a substitute for specific advice concerning individual situations. Readers should seek legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein. Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities, including Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated (collectively the Mayer Brown Practices ), and affiliated non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (the Mayer Brown Consultancies ). The Mayer Brown Practices and Mayer Brown Consultancies are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and Mayer Brown Consultancies can be found in the Legal tices section of our website. Mayer Brown and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown. 2018 Mayer Brown. All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. 0718