Method Form W+ Domain INCOME AND ASSETS

Similar documents
NEPAD/Spanish Fund for African Women s empowerment

Development Cooperation Development Education Partnership Fair. Writing a successful co financing application

Incremental cost methodology: potential approaches for the Green Climate Fund

Reporting climate change risk

Policy measures introduced in order to achieve energy savings among final customers in the Czech Republic

Linking Country Level Monitoring and Evaluation to FCPF Progress Reporting

Accounting for climate change

TCP Facility COMPONENT DESCRIPTION

Final Evaluation & Outcome Assessment of Promotion of Sustainable Agriculture for Nutrition and Food Security (POSAN FS) Project

PLANNING BUREAU SUMMARY. December 2009

The Carbon Offset Trade Association (COTA) and The Alberta Offset Credits Market

PRODUCTIVE SECTOR COMMERCE PDNA GUIDELINES VOLUME B

EN 1 EN. Rural Development HANDBOOK ON COMMON MONITORING AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK. Guidance document. September 2006

WORKING PAPER OF THE COMMISSION SERVICES CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF ANNEX XVIII ANNUAL AND FINAL REPORTING

SIMULTRAIN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT USER GUIDE

Gold Standard for the Global Goals Claims Guidelines

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION AGENT (IVA)

Introduction to RELCOST. Carolyn Roos, Ph.D. Northwest CHP Technical Assistance Partnerships Washington State University Energy Program

MANUAL OF PROCEDURES FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS TO PARTICIPATING PARTNERS

Fund for Gender Equality Monitoring and Evaluation Framework Executive Summary

Cross Border Co-operation between Bulgaria & Romania Multi-annual Programme Project Fiche for Programme Support

Health Planning Cycle

The Results Measurement (ReM) framework methodology

PRODUCTIVE SECTOR MANUFACTURING PDNA GUIDELINES VOLUME B

Risk Management. Policy No. 14. Document uncontrolled when printed DOCUMENT CONTROL. SSAA Vic

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MODEL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM PROJECT

Field Operations, Interview Protocol & Survey Weighting

PROJECT PROPOSAL WRITING (A Tool for Resource Mobilization and Effective Attainment of Organization Objectives) OJI OGBUREKE, PhD November 2011

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCTS IN THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2010

Investment criteria indicators

Multi-country European Integration Facility

PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENT NO.1 REPORTING PROCEDURES AND MONITORING INDICATORS

PLANNING and M&E for RESULTS

Social costs tend to persist over a person s lifetime while most tangible costs are one-off

Costing National Agriculture Investment Plans (NAIPs)

How to Develop High-Quality Full Application Writing a Winning Proposal

Al-Amal Microfinance Bank

An Evaluation of Rural Social Service Programme of the Government of Bangladesh

STEP 7. Before starting Step 7, you will have

Re: Consultation Paper on Commercial Insurer s Solvency Self Assessment ( CISSA CP )

Gr an t Writing Federal Non-Construction Proposal Elements

No An act relating to the Vermont energy act of (S.214) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:

Women & Investing: Take Control of Your Wealth

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT FOR 2011 FINAL DATA

The Accreditation and Verification Regulation - Verifier s risk analysis

Multi-country European Integration Facility

Productive Accompanying Measures to Safety Nets in the Sahel ASP Program: the case of Niger

Impact Evaluation of Savings Groups and Stokvels in South Africa

Will the Financial Stability Board be a game changer for climate risk disclosures?

Tracking Government Investments for Nutrition at Country Level Patrizia Fracassi, Clara Picanyol, 03 rd July 2014

Guidance for Member States on the Drawing of Management Declaration and Annual Summary

Guidance Note on the Preparation of Financing Plan of REDD+ and Landscape Emission Reduction Programs

Executive Board Annual Session Rome, May 2015 POLICY ISSUES ENTERPRISE RISK For approval MANAGEMENT POLICY WFP/EB.A/2015/5-B

Potential and exemplar financial. Makoto Kato

Terms of Reference (ToR) Business Potential survey in Doti District

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT FOR THE SECOND QUARTER OF 2011

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Regulatory Scrutiny Board. Opinion

Equality Impact Assessment

Joint OECD / Eurostat questionnaire on national accounts employment and hours worked CZECH REPUBLIC

Registration and Issuance Process

Lecture in Energy Economics: Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Bankable Projects in Sustainable Energy

Social Finance Israel

Template for comments Date: Document:

DOES MICRO CREDIT CREATE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Business Auditing - Enterprise Risk Management. October, 2018

How do EU-15 Member States Benefit from the Cohesion Policy in the V4?

BUSINESS PLAN / PROPOSAL

VALUE ADDED TAX (VAT) Post Implementation Audit and Assurance to Board Audit Committee 12 DECEMBER 2017

NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL

Sport England: Understanding variations in sports participation between local authorities

Funding SDG Impacts: Gold Standard for the Global Goals Summary of Q&As from webinar held on Thursday 9 th February 2017

GEF SGP PROJECT PROPOSAL TEMPLATE AND GUIDELINES. Rwanda. [Date proposal]

Terms of Reference. Impact Assessment Study of

Project Management for the Professional Professional Part 3 - Risk Analysis. Michael Bevis, JD CPPO, CPSM, PMP

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2011

UBS Investor Watch. Analyzing investor sentiment and behavior / 2Q Couples and money. Who decides? a b

Second-Party Opinion EDP Green Bond The Framework applies to issuances by EDP Energias de Portugal S.A. and EDP Finance BV.

1. Define risk. Which are the various types of risk?

TRANSFORMING THE LIVES OF RURAL WOMEN AND GIRLS THROUGH GENDER AND EQUITY BUDGETING

Green Bond Guidelines for the Real Estate Sector

COSTS AND RETURNS. What procedures should be in place for effective monitoring?

Table of Contents Objectives of the Guidance on Outcomes and Indicators : Suggested Outcomes and Indicators for the Areas of Support...

Draft Policy Proposals on a Global MBM Scheme (GMBM) (As of 17 December 2015)

The Status of Women in the Middle East and North Africa (SWMENA) Project

S. Hashemi and W. Umaira (2010), New pathways for the poorest: the graduation model from BRAC, BRAC Development Institute, Dhaka.

CEIOPS-DOC-61/10 January Former Consultation Paper 65

June 10 th, 2015 / Ankara, Turkey

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT, THIRD QUARTER OF 2018 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

WORLD HEALTH SURVEY -United Arab Emirates- HIGHLIGHTS REF: PRE-12-NG006

MANAGING TRANSFER PRICING ISSUES IN AN EVOLVING BEPS ENVIRONMENT

Gouvernance et Emergence de la Recherche en Sciences Humaines au Cambodge GEReSH-CAM

LCRP Steering Committee Meeting 3 JULY 2018

Good Practice when Preparing a Project Proposal. 15 February 2005

T HE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS D EFINITION & T REATMENT OF DAS ERRORS

Annex 2: Integrated Results and Resources Framework (IRRF) Methodology and 2015 Results. Methodological Notes...2. Tier One: Impact...

Value for Money Research: The voice of the Member Launch: 2 March 2017

Brief Introduction. To Completing the Logframe Matrix

Guidance paper on the use of internal models for risk and capital management purposes by insurers

Crowe, Dana, et al "EvaluatingProduct Risks" Design For Reliability Edited by Crowe, Dana et al Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC,2001

Project Cycle Management (PCM) Guidebook

Transcription:

Method Form W+ Domain INCOME AND ASSETS Method Number: W+ Income and Assets 001 Name of the proponent: Title of the proposed method: Type to which the new proposed method (category) belongs to: WOCAN Quantification of Increased Income and Assets for Women as a result of a Project or Program Level Intervention Type I Renewable energy projects Type II Energy efficiency improvements Type III Other project activities The accompanying questionnaire may need to be adapted for specific technologies or assets that could be increased. This method is to be used in conjunction with: Survey Questionnaires in Annex (including Do-no-harm Assessment) Project Design Document Template Guidelines for sampling and surveys for project activities and program of activities http://cdm.unfccc.int/reference/guidclarif/meth/meth_guid48.pdf Tool for Verification of Financial Payments to Primary Beneficiaries as a result of a Project or Program Level Intervention Page 1

Section A: Introduction The following describes the key elements of the method: A.1 Typical projects: Typical projects that can apply this method are as follows: - Introduction of domestic biogas digesters OR - improving the operational performance of already installed domestic biogas digesters OR - introducing high-efficient thermal energy generation units utilizing non-renewable biomass OR - retrofitting existing units that reduce the amount of money women are spending for the collection of fuel for purposes of household energy use (such as cooking, lighting, heating) and on project implementation. A.2 Type of benefit for women: Income and Assets Increase (IAI) Project or program intervention results in increase in income and/or assets. IAI units are denominated in dollars per year and the number of impacted eligible beneficiaries within a vintage year. IAI units can be communicated in terms of monetary value (dollars) and number of beneficiaries. If a project produces W+ units across multiple domains, the number of beneficiaries cannot be doublecounted. A.3 W+ Project Design Activities: Project Developers describe the project design elements that are implemented to build readiness for the generation of the benefits for women identified in A.2 and to safe-guard the participation of women in relation to decisions about and control over the use of these benefits. Typical activities include: - Stakeholder consultations to raise awareness about the objectives and functioning of W+, identify women s empowerment needs and select domains of W+ to be used (see W+ Program Guide) - Development of indicators, activities and monitoring plans and mechanisms (see W+ Program Guide, Report Template) - Establishment or use of existing women-controlled savings or micro-finance schemes for the processing of W+ linked payments (see Tool for, Reporting and Verification of Financial Payments to Primary Beneficiaries) Page 2

Section B: Scope, Applicability, Origination period and Entry into Force B.1 Scope The scope includes project interventions for use in residential, commercial or institutional applications. B.2. Applicability Income and asset increases shall be accounted for all women within user households. Applicability is limited to 1) projects that meet the eligibility criteria of a relevant method under an established and reputable carbon standard, or 2) projects that could be certified to provide a higher premium out of the supply chain by financing women s economic empowerment. This is to be established by reference to a project s registration or demonstrated compliance with a carbon standard s applicability criteria (applicability criteria section of the applicable carbon standard method must be included in the project documentation) or demonstrated compliance with certification programs. The increases in income and assets must be material and relevant for women by demonstrating, i.e. as a result of a stakeholder consultation, that it is identified as a priority benefit by a simple majority of participants. (Refer to the guidance on stakeholder process). B.3. W+ Unit Origination period The W+ Unit Origination period refers to the time-period of the project activity or program for which it is permitted to generate W+ units. The W+ Unit Origination period starts from the date of W+ project registration minus two years OR the start of project operation if project operation commenced less than two years after W+ registration. If the project/program is already registered under a carbon standard, it can earn retroactive units for a maximum of two years prior to the W+ registration date and lasts for 10 years (not extendable) OR seven years and can be renewed twice; if Project Developers can demonstrate that the project still meets method eligibility criteria (established via revalidation) before start of second origination period. B.4 Entry into Force The date of entry into force of this method is immediate after the date of publication of this method on the W+ website, www.wplus.org. B.5 Normative References Project Developers need to refer to the following tools and guidance: - W+ Program Guide - Guidance on stakeholder process (4 Step Process for Stakeholder Analysis) - W+ Income and Assets User Survey Questionnaires (including Do-no-harm Assessment) - Guidance on how to carry out survey and baseline (refer to Section C below, Quantification of Outcomes) - Tool for, Reporting and Verification of Financial Payments to Primary Beneficiaries B6. Definitions The definitions provided in the Annex I shall apply. Page 3

Section C: Quantification of Outcomes C.1 Baseline Situation The baseline is the prevailing practice prior to project implementation and prior to the implementation of W+ project design activities. A baseline can be developed either 1) prior to the project implementation or; 2) using a control group of non-users. C.2 Determination of Income and Assets Increase as Result of Project Activity 1. Determination of increased income and assets for the initial verification as well as the verification that includes the 5 th and 10 th year of operation Income and assets increases are determined by comparing representative samples of Income and Assets survey results from users against the baseline. Survey design is in compliance with the general guidance on sampling, as found in Guidelines for sampling and surveys for CDM project activities and program of activities: http://cdm.unfccc.int/reference/guidclarif/meth/meth_guid48.pdf. 2. Calculation approach/formula: The total income and assets increase for women is calculated by comparing women s increase in income and assets with that of the baseline, adjustments for household labor and other expenses, adjustments for loss of income and assets to non-women as result of project implementation, and adjustments for days the project intervention was not operational. IAI = Wc,n,p * [ sum (A + B + C + D + E + F + G + H) sum (I + J + K)] Where: IAI = Wc,n,p = Income and assets increased for women during project operation. Number of women engaged in the income generating activities within a verification period. A B C Increase of income when project is operating as designed. Established by comparing Income and Assets survey results of users vs. baseline and calibrated on a per-person basis. Calculation = average monthly income (monthly income during current period + monthly income during other seasonal/agricultural periods divided by 12) increase in monthly income this year over previous year. Average funds saved per month over the past year. Established by comparing results of users vs. baseline answers to funds saved and calibrated on a per-person basis. Combined value of land owned + residence owned. Established by comparing results of users vs. baseline answers to land owned and residence owned within the same community and calibrated on a per-person basis. Page 4

D E F G H I J K Combined value of funds invested in savings group + line of credit. Established by comparing results of users vs. baseline answers to value of funds invested in savings group and line of credit within the same community and calibrated on a per-person basis. Value of prioritized assets. Established by comparing results of users vs. baseline answers to 5 most valuable assets within the same community and calibrated on a per-person basis, and multiplying by number of each asset. Value of livestock owned. Established by comparing results of users vs. baseline answers to the value of livestock owned within the same community and calibrated on a perperson basis. Value of agricultural equipment not listed above. Established by comparing results of users vs. baseline answers to the value of additional agricultural equipment within the same community and calibrated on a per-person basis. Income potential based on formal education level. Established by comparing results of users vs. baseline answers to level of formal education within the same community and calibrated on a per-person basis, then multiplied by income potential for country at that level. Value of household labor invested. Established by comparing results of users vs. baseline answers to monthly hours of household labor invested within the same community and calibrated on a per-person basis, then multiplied by living wage for the country. Value of expenses (waged laborers, materials, equipment, energy costs, fees, etc.) invested. Established by comparing results of users vs. baseline answers to the value of expenses invested within the same community and calibrated on a per-person basis. The expense of waged laborers is calculated by number of workers multiplied by monthly hours worked multiplied by the living wage for the country. Value of income and assets lost to non-women due to project. Established by comparing results of users vs. baseline answers to value of income and assets lost to non-women as a result of the project. Section D: Plan for Output and Outcome Indicators Describe in the Project Design Document (PDD) how the project will measure results, through specific indicators, means of verification and procedures for obtaining, recording, compiling and analyzing data and information important for quantifying and reporting of income and asset increases. Explain the organization chart, and persons responsible for each task. At the time of installation, the project should be properly tested and number of households using the units should be recorded and labeled. It needs to be verified every year as per applied carbon standards. D.1 Data and Parameters Available at Validation and Verification of Output Indicators Page 5

Provide data/parameter which will be required for calculation during validation and verification. Copy/ paste each table with parameter in the benefit evaluation document, as per the PDD Template. SL no. 1 parameter name Number of women engaged in the income generating activities WC,np Survey/project data etc Sampling/survey - At each survey - At each verification How is it ensured that the correct number of households is recorded SL no. 2 parameter name Income increases when project is operating as designed. A 1 Describe the for data collection SL no. 3 parameter name Average funds saved per month over the past year. B Describe the for data collection 1 These generic symbols can be adapted to be more representative of each factor later Page 6

SL no. 4 parameter name Combined value of land owned + residence owned. C At each verification Describe the for data collection SL no. 5 parameter name Combined value of funds invested in savings group + line of credit. D Describe the for data collection SL no. 6 parameter name Value of top 5 assets. E Describe the for data collection SL no. 7 parameter name Value of livestock owned. F Page 7

Describe the for data collection SL no. 8 parameter name Value of agricultural equipment not listed above. G Describe the for data collection SL no. 9 parameter name Income potential based on formal education level. H Describe the for data collection SL no. 10 parameter name Value of household labor invested. I Page 8

Describe the for data collection SL no. 11 parameter name Value of expenses (waged laborers, materials, equipment, energy costs, fees, etc.) invested. J Describe the for data collection SL no. 12 parameter name Value of income and assets lost to non-women due to project. K Describe the for data collection D. 2 Data and Parameters Available at Validation and Verification The monitoring of outcome indicators associated with income and assets is required for the application of the W+ Income and Assets. The Project Design Document (PDD) shall describe how the project will measure results, through specific indicators, means of verification and procedures for obtaining, recording, compiling and analyzing data and information important for quantifying and reporting of income and assets units. Explain the organization chart, and persons responsible for each task. The following should be described in the PDD and reported in the Report: Expected Changes (based on qualitative and narrative indicators) that show a change in the Page 9

status and condition of women. Project indicators, targets, and logic chain that link all the elements of the results chain, as below: RESULTS CHAIN End Outcomes Intermediate Outcomes Immediate Outcomes Outputs INDICATORS Increased control over decisions related to household finances Increased assets equal or more than men Increased income and assets Engagement in income generating activities Do No harm Indicators specific to the Income and Assets Method are described below. Corresponding questions should be included in the survey questionnaire. See the example in Survey Questionnaire for Users in Annex B below. Do No Harm Indicators and Questions Indicators for Income and Assets Domain Questions for Income and Assets Domain Not less than 97% of both women and men report that the project has not caused a loss of income or assets or other any unwelcome effects (check for risks of increased labor for children). Have you lost control over land you held through ownership or leasehold legal arrangements? Have you lost access to a bank account or membership in savings group? Did the time needed to participate in project prevent you from participating in income-generating activities or employment? Did you have to invest too much time building the income or assets you gained? If the project generated employment: Has the income gap between women and men increased? Have you had to sell household assets (jewelry, livestock etc) in order to pay for aspects of the project (installation, operation or maintenance)? Was information and training on maintenance and operation of the project sufficient for both men and women? Has increase in income or assets led to any physical or emotional abuse? Project Developers will identify the indicators of change to evidence social impact across this domain. Anticipated indicators of change to evidence social impact for this project will include, but not be limited to: Increased economic agency (immediate outcome) Page 10

Increased participation in decision-making (immediate outcome) Increased perception of well-being (intermediate outcome) Sample Outcome Indicators: Improved status of women in the community Increased control by women over finances and decision making Sample questions for discussions in focus groups o Who makes the decisions around how you spend money in your family? o What can you buy without consulting? o What purchases (or sales) need to be discussed jointly with husband? o What are the consequences of buying without consultation with your husband? Improved family dynamics relationships with children and partners Sample questions for discussion in focus groups include: o Do you believe that your family wellbeing is improved? How would you define economic agency? Give examples? Do you believe the income and assets gained from the introduction of the project has somehow contributed to economic agency? And if so, how? And if not, why? Improved quality of participation in group activities and social interactions Sample questions for discussion in focus groups: o How are you spending, investing, or saving your increased income and assets? o What would you do with additional income and assets? Section E: Stakeholder processes Project Developers should refer to the 4 Step Process for Stakeholder Analysis document for guidance on stakeholder processes. Section F: Annexes Annex A Definitions: Income: Money received, especially on a regular basis, through work or through investments. Assets: Material and social resources. A tangible (material) asset is a valuable item that is owned. An intangible (social) asset can include education, skills, political participation, or any attribute that facilitates performing labor to produce economic value. Women: Female members of households who are at least 16 years of age. Page 11