Options for North Wagga

Similar documents
Britannia Village Flood Control Project

DEFINING BEST PRACTICE IN FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program

Frequently Asked Questions Oxbow / Hickson / Bakke Ring Levee Option

Strategic Flood Risk Management

DO WE NEED TO CONSIDER FLOODS RARER THAN 1% AEP?

Presented by: Connie Perkins, PE, CFM April 20, 2016

JAXGIS FEMA Flood Hazard Mapping -- Frequently Asked Questions

Floodplain Management Innovation to Facilitate City Growth

Floodplain Management Annual Conference Atlanta, Georgia April 2017

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

BGC Project Memorandum

ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (ABFEs)

Vehicle parking space allocation policy

Integrating Hazus into the Flood Risk Assessment

P art B 4 NATURAL HAZARDS. Natural Hazards ISSUE 1. River Flooding

Environment Agency pre-application advice incorporating Local Flood Risk Standing Advice from East Lindsey District Council

FEMA s Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grant Programs. Jeff Ward, JSWA

10526 Bermuda Isle Dr. Tampa, FL 33647

Flood Mitigation. Asset Management Plan (Concise)

Flood Risk Management

Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction

DES MOINES CITY OF TWO RIVERS. Flooding Risk & Impact to Development

Volusia County Floodplain Management Plan 2012

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Planning in Water s Way: Flood Resilient Economic Development Strategy for the I-86 Innovation Corridor

Tool 3.3: Case study example of risk assessment using RiskScape

New Tools for Mitigation & Outreach. Louie Greenwell Stantec

Skagit Floodway Mitigation and Hamilton Relocation Program FACT SHEET

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

Guideline For Compliance With The Standards and Criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program

10526 Bermuda Isle Dr. Tampa, FL 33647

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

The AIR Inland Flood Model for Great Britian

INSURANCE AFFORDABILITY A MECHANISM FOR CONSISTENT INDUSTRY & GOVERNMENT COLLABORATION PROPERTY EXPOSURE & RESILIENCE PROGRAM

East Hartford. Challenges

Sources of FEMA Funding

Presenters. Bracken Engineering. Structures Disasters Forensics

Floodplain Management 101. Mississippi Emergency Management Agency Floodplain Management Bureau

7. Understand effect of multiple annual exposures e.g., 30-yr period and multiple independent locations yr event over 30 years 3%

12/07/2017. Developing a Practical Shelter In Place Policy A Case Study in Fairfield. Overview. Pressures

COBB COUNTY HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM

Elgin (Potentially Vulnerable Area 05/05) Local Planning District Local authority Main catchment Findhorn, Nairn and Speyside The Moray Council River

Analysis of costs & benefits of risk reduction strategies

Mill Creek Floodplain Proposed Bylaw Frequently Asked Questions

Exercise 7b. Analysis of costs & benefits of risk reduction scenarios.

Hazard Mitigation Grants. Technical Assistance Session Middlesex County, NJ December 7, 2011

BUYOUTS/RELOCATION/FLOODPROOFING: REGULATORY PROGRAMS AND EXPERIENCE IN OTHER COMMUNITIES

STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about TWIA Increased Cost of Construction Coverage

SUBJECT: LAND USE PLANNING POLICY WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN (REPORT #2)

THE ECONOMIC ARGUMENT FOR AMPHIBIOUS RETROFIT CONSTRUCTION

IN THIS ISSUE SPRING FLOODS. Black River, Pocahontas, Arkansas

International Real Estate Society Conference 99. Long Term Impact of Flood Affectation on Residential Property Prices

King County Flood Control District Flood Risk Reduction Work Program and Accomplishments

Federal Flood Risk Management Standards. An Update on Federal Flood Resilience Standards

Two cases: Naga City Hangberg, Cape Town

Comprehensive Flood Mitigation for 12,000 Properties

Flood Risk Management for Caravan Parks in Victoria

DAEN SUBJECT: Little Colorado River at Winslow, Arizona, Flood Risk Management Project

Flooding in Brisbane. Challenges and implications. Kerry Doss Manager City Planning & Economic Development

Flood Insurance for Local Officials and Floodplain Managers. What Every Community Official Needs to Know About Flood Insurance

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

MAKING THE MOST OF LOCAL FLOOD MANAGEMENT PLANNING IN MELBOURNE S MUNICIPALITIES AND THE PORT PHILLIP AND WESTERNPORT REGION

Short Course on Floodplain Management

ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN

Vocabulary of Flood Risk Management Terms

Hillfoots Villages (Potentially Vulnerable Area 09/04) Local Plan District Forth Local authority Clackmannanshire Council, Stirling Council Main catch

National Disaster Mitigation Program NDMP Overview, Ontario Projects, and Final Call for Proposals

A Flood Mitigation Plan for the Non-Tidal N.J. Section of the Delaware River Basin. Warren County Planning Workshop (2 nd Meeting) March 7, 2007

Floodplain Development Permit Application

Huntington Beach LCPA 1-16 (Sunset Beach Specific Plan) DRAFT Hazard Analysis Sug Mod Working Document/Not for general circulation.

Flood Damage Assessment (Case study: Sirajganj District)

The 2004 Gilbert F. White National Flood Policy Forum September 21-22, 2004 FLOOD STANDARDS IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES

Flood Risk. How do we manage flood risks? Built Form. Components of Flood Risk. Consequence of a flood. Chance of a flood

Floodplain Development Permit Application

A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICE IN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRALIA

DuPage County East Branch DuPage River Resiliency Project. Benefit Cost Analysis

SPILLWAY ADEQUACY ANALYSIS ROUGH RIVER LAKE LOUISVILLE DISTRICT

Appendix K. Hamilton Social and Economic Statistical Data

TAX INCREMENT PROJECT PLAN

Challenges in Mitigation of NYU Langone Medical Center after Hurricane Sandy

Paschali Stauroula Karanika Chrisoula Kokovinos Konstantinos Koujianos Ioannis Vatistas Panagiotis

National Flood Insurance Program Making Sense of April 2019 Changes

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

Flood Analysis Memo. 629 Orangewood Dr. Dunedin, FL BFE = 21 ft

Eddleston, Peebles, Innerleithen, Selkirk, Stow and Galashiels (Potentially Vulnerable Area 13/04) Local Plan District Local authority Main catchment

AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 50: FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT

Flood Risk in South Australia. Hazard Leaders in SA Animal and Plant Disease. Zone Emergency Management Ctees. Flood Risk in SA 11/06/2013

Palu, Indonesia. Local progress report on the implementation of the 10 Essentials for Making Cities Resilient ( )

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF URBAN FLOOD PROTECTION

Vision to Action: Creating and Using a Flood Risk Assessment for Identifying Mitigation Options

Flood Risk Outreach Tools for Georgia Communities. GAFM 10 th Annual Conference Presented By: Jarrett Mattli

Appendix P Non-Structural

The National Flood Insurance Program and Flood Insurance Rate Map for San Francisco. Presentation at Treasure Island Community Meeting

State Planning Policy state interest guidance material. Natural hazards, risks and resilience Flood

Existing Manhattan Levee

This document was prepared by. Risk Assessment, Mapping, and Planning Partners 8401 Arlington Boulevard Fairfax, Virginia 22031

Chapter 6 - Floodplains

Federal Grants Provide $6 Benefit for Each $1 Invested

Transcription:

Options for North Wagga As a direct result of community feedback received during the exhibition of the levee upgrade concept designs, a number of alternatives for protecting North Wagga during a flood event have been investigated. insurance policy. It is the amount of money that would have to be set aside each and every year to draw upon as required to pay for flood damages as they occur into the future. The following options have been explored as part of this process. Maintain the North Wagga levees at the current Raise the North Wagga levees to a 1 in 20 year Raise the North Wagga levees above a 1 in 20 year Remove the existing North Wagga levees Relocation of the North Wagga village from the floodplain Raising residences in North Wagga Raising houses in Mill Street & East Street that are protected by the smaller of the North Wagga levees Voluntary purchase of properties in North Wagga In assessing these options, both the capital cost associated with the option and the cost of damage to property due to flooding have been considered. Council is seeking feedback from the community about which options they believe should be prioritised. Average Annual Damages (AAD) Depending on its size (or severity), each flood will cause a different amount of damage to a flood prone area. AAD is the average damage per year that would occur due to flooding over a very long period of time. AAD may be thought of as a self In this analysis the flood damage to properties (both residential and nonresidential) inside the North Wagga levees for flooding up to the probable maximum flood (PMF) has been considered. The analysis considers both direct (loss of property, structural damage etc) and indirect (temporary accommodation etc) costs. The figures do not include the cost of damage to public land and infrastructure. Maintain the North Wagga levees at the current This option is to maintain the status quo and take no further action. There will be no change to flood behaviour or impact inside or outside of the North Wagga levee system as a result of this option. The current levee system provides to the North Wagga village up to a river height of 9.9m Estimated capital cost: $0 Average Annual Damages: $1,204,000 Lowest capital cost Increased damages compared to other options

Raise the North Wagga levees to a 1 in 20 year This option is the basis of the detailed design currently being undertaken for the North Wagga levee system. It involves increasing the height of the levee to provide up to the 1 in 20 year flood level. Raising the levees to this height will have minimal impact on the levels of flood water outside of the levees. For a 1 in 20 year flood event properties in the vicinity of Bomen Lagoon and the North Wagga Floodplain will experience an increase in flood height in the order of 2-5cm. There are small sections of East Wagga that will also experience a small increase in water level, but for the most of the floodplain there will be no change in flood level compared to existing conditions. Estimated capital cost: $4,800,000 Average Annual Damages: $689,000 The cost estimate may be broken down as follows: a) North Wagga levee approximately $3,350,000 b) Levee Two (East Street and Mill Street) approximately $1,450,000 Provides additional over current level Provides the same that was designed for previously Does not provide against flooding above a 1 in 20 year flood event. Raise the North Wagga levees above a 1 in 20 year The scenario that has been used to inform this option is to upgrade the North Wagga levee system to a 1 in 100 year level of. This will also require an increase in height of the Main City levee system. Raising the levees to this height will have minimal impact on the levels of flood water on the floodplain upstream of the levees. For a 1 in 100 year flood event the maximum increase in flood level is 20cm with increases in depth from 10cm-20cm occurring 0km-2km upstream of the levee. From 2km-3km upstream the change in depth is 5cm-10cm. Where there is development in East Wagga (3km-5km upstream) the change is 2cm-5cm. Very little additional land is inundated. Estimated capital cost: $6,810,000 Average Annual Damages: $149,000 The cost estimate may be broken down as follows: a) North Wagga levee approximately $4,130,000 b) Levee Two (East Street and Mill Street) approximately $1,620,000 c) Increase in height of Main City levee approximately $1,060,000 Provides similar as the Main Levee (1%AEP) Loss of amenity with the levee being 0.9m- 1m higher than a 1 in 20 design height.

Has one of the least Annual Average Damages Increased pressure to allow the construction of new houses on vacant blocks. Issues associated with evacuating North Wagga in the event of a flood that is larger than a 1 in 100 year flood event. Results in an increased height and cost of upgrading the Main City Levee. Remove the existing North Wagga levees This option involves the removal of the North Wagga levee system. Other controls would have to be considered if this option were to be pursued (eg house raising, relocation, voluntary acquisition etc). The impact on the floodplain and flood behaviour is quite similar to existing conditions. Estimated capital cost: $395,000 Average Annual Damages: $1,515,000 Has the cheapest capital cost Provides no flood Will result in property damage Relocation of the North Wagga village from the floodplain This option is based on the complete relocation of North Wagga village to a flood free location. The costs for this option are based on the construction of a new suburb of equal size and do not include the cost of land, relocation of existing buildings, construction of new buildings and demolition of existing buildings in North Wagga. Estimated capital cost: $93,500,000 Has the lowest annual average damages Has the highest capital cost Would be a major disruption Raising residences in North Wagga This option involves raising all buildings that may be raised to above the 1 in 100 year flood level. In the analysis an allowance has been made for demolition and reconstruction to above the 1 in 100 year flood level for buildings that cannot be raised. These estimates include houses within both the main North Wagga levee and houses in East and Mill Street. Estimated capital cost: 16,850,000 Dwellings are out of flood waters Some dwellings cannot be raised Those dwellings that cannot be raised would require the construction of new raised dwellings Damage to other property and facilities would still occur

More difficult for elderly or disabled people to access dwellings Cost greater than cost of levee raising Raising houses in Mill Street and East Street that are protected by the smaller of the North Wagga levees An alternative measure may be to cease occupation of properties in that area, with voluntary purchases of properties to remove residents from the risk of flooding and the cost of clean-up post flood. There are a number of ways this option could be implemented, and time limits could be imposed for this scheme. Estimated capital cost: $37,200,000 This is similar to the previous option but only applies to residences in Mill Street and East Street. Estimated capital cost: $1,650,000 Voluntary purchase of properties in North Wagga Flood mitigation in high hazard areas of a floodplain may be impractical or uneconomic for existing properties. Option More information Online: wagga.nsw.gov.au/floodfutures Email: floodfutures@wagga.nsw.gov.au Phone: Lauren Fitzgerald, Community Engagement Officer Summary of North Wagga Options Capital Cost Maintain North Wagga Levees and take no further action $0 $1.2M Raise to a 1 in 20 yr $4.8M $689K Raise to a 1 in 100 yr $6.81M $149K Remove the existing North Wagga levees $395K $1.5M Relocation of the village from the floodplain $93.5M $0 Raising residences in North Wagga $16.85M N/A Raising residences in East and Mill Streets $1.65M N/A Voluntary purchase $37.2M N/A Average Annual Damages

Summary table: Average annual damages Maintain the North Wagga levees at the current 1 in 10 (10% AEP) 42 23 $1,302,000 1 in 20 (5% AEP) 163 148 $10,455,000 Average Annual Damages: $1,204,000 Raising the North Wagga Levee to a 1 in 20 year level of 1 in 10 (10% AEP) 0 0 $0 1 in 20 (5% AEP) 0 0 $0 Average Annual Damages: $689,000 Raising the North Wagga Levee to a 1 in 100 year level of 1 in 10 (10% AEP) 0 0 $0 1 in 20 (5% AEP) 0 0 $0 1 in 50 (2% AEP) 0 0 $0 1 in 100 (1% AEP) 0 0 $0 Average Annual Damages:149,000 Removing the existing North Wagga levees 1 in 5 (20% AEP) 19 3 $167,000 1 in 10 (10% AEP) 143 87 $4,996,000 1 in 20 (5% AEP) 163 148 $10,455,000 Average Annual Damages: $1,515,000 Source: North Wagga Damage Assessment by WMA Water