IN THE MATTER OF the Utilities Commission Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, Chapter 473. and

Similar documents
BC HYDRO CONTRACTED GBL EXHIBIT A-6

ANNEXE D BRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION ORDER G-23-01

FORTISBC ENERGY CEC ROE 2016 EXHIBIT A-7

FEVI DEFERRAL ACCOUNT PEC EXHIBIT A2-3

IN THE MATTER OF the Utilities Commission Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, Chapter 473. and

Parties are invited to make submissions on IR responses and the additional topics to be issued by the Panel. ACTION DATE (2014)

FORTISBC INC. RECONSIDERATION AND VARIANCE OF ORDER G PHASE 2 EXHIBIT A-4

FortisBC Inc. Annual Review of 2018 Rates Project No Final Order with Reasons for Decision

FEVI DEFERRAL ACCOUNT PEC EXHIBIT A2-1

BCPIAC s Low Income Electricity Affordability Proposals for BC Hydro s Rate Design Application

FORTISBC INC PERFORMANCE BASED RATEMAKING REVENUE REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT A-27

Creative Energy Vancouver Platforms Inc. Creative NEFC Neighbourhood Energy Agreement Amendments Submission of FortisBC Energy Inc.

Re: FortisBC Inc. Application for Approval of Demand Side Management Expenditures for the Period of 2015 and 2016

ORDER NUMBER G IN THE MATTER OF the Utilities Commission Act, RSBC 1996, Chapter 473. and

IN THE MATTER OF the Utilities Commission Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, Chapter 473. and

For further information, please contact Sylvia von Minden at or by at

INFORMATION RELEASE BCUC Receives Comments from BC Hydro on Site C Inquiry Final Report November 24, 2017

IN THE MATTER OF FORTISBC INC. AND DECISION. January 20, 2009 BEFORE:

FortisBC Inc. Application for an Exempt Residential Rate

This is in response to your July 17, 2006 letter (attached) in which you state that

FortisBC Inc. Annual Review of 2018 Rates Project No British Columbia Utilities Commission Information Request No. 1

included in the survey is published in the Quarterly Reports and the Budget and Fiscal Plan.

Attention: Mr. Patrick Wruck, Commission Secretary and Manager, Regulatory Support

DECISION and Order E and Letter L-15-16

STARGAS APPLICATION TO ALTER RATES. Re: Stargas Utilities Ltd. Application to Alter Rates and Refinance

January 23, Via Original via Mail. British Columbia Utilities Commission 6 th Floor, 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2N3

Decision D FortisAlberta Inc Performance-Based Regulation Capital Tracker True-Up. January 11, 2018

Participant Assistance/Cost Award Guidelines Amendment

PNG WEST 2013 REVENUE REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT A-9

Decision D FortisAlberta Inc PBR Capital Tracker True-Up and PBR Capital Tracker Forecast

August 29, British Columbia Utilities Commission 6 th Floor, 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2N3

ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. (South)

For further information, please contact Guy Leroux at

Attached is BC Hydro s annual filing of the Report on Demand-Side Management Activities for the 12 months ending March 31, 2012.

VIA October 27, 2005

On June 10 and July 5, 2013, FEI and FBC, respectively, filed the Applications as referenced above.

BC HYDRO F2012 F2014 REVENUE REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT A2 8

INFORMATION RELEASE BCUC responds to BC Hydro s comments on the Site C Inquiry Final Report November 28, 2017

FortisBC Inc. (FBC) Application for Approval of Demand Side Management (DSM) Expenditures for 2015 and 2016 FBC Final Submission

July 7, 2015 File No.: /14797 BY . British Columbia Utilities Commission 6 th floor, 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2N3

Please direct any inquiries regarding this matter to the undersigned.

FEU COMMON RATES, AMALGAMATION RATE DESIGN RECONSIDERATION PHASE 2 EXHIBIT A-4

Submitted by Western Power

Ms. Laurel Ross, Acting Commission Secretary and Director

Participant Assistance/Cost Award Application

building trust. driving confidence.

Réponse du Transporteur et du Distributeur à l'engagement 4

BC HYDRO SITE C CLEAN ENERGY PROJECT SUPPLY AND INSTALLATION OF TURBINES AND GENERATORS CONTRACT. for the Site C Clean Energy Project

FORTISBC INC. PURCHASE OF THE UTILITY ASSETS CITY OF KELOWNA EXHIBIT A2 2

AltaLink Management Ltd.

November 16, British Columbia Utilities Commission 6th Floor, 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2N3

ENMAX Power Corporation

Won Sang Shen Cho, also known as Craig Cho, d.b.a. Chosen Media and Groops Media. Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c Hearing

Creative Energy Response to BCOAPO IR 1 May 30, 2018

Pacific Northern Gas Ltd. and Pacific Northern Gas (N.E.) Ltd. ( PNG ) 2012 Pension and Non-Pension Benefits Application. Final Submission of

AltaGas Utilities Inc.

Reference: Exhibit B-5-1, page 1-4, Section , Electricity Demand Growth

Diane Roy Vice President, Regulatory Affairs

Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC) 2018 Basic Insurance Rate Design Application Project No ICBC s Reply to TREAD Submission

British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority (BC Hydro) Application for Approval of New Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with FortisBC Inc.

Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner Province of British Columbia Order No October 3, 1994

Environmental Appeal Board

Financials April 1, 2009 March 31, Management s Discussion and Analysis 23. Management Report 40

Please find attached BC Hydro's supplemental responses to BCUC IR and BCUC IR

Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP * Barristers and Solicitors Patent and Trade-mark Agents

Decision The ATCO Utilities. Corporate Costs. March 21, 2013

British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority. F2017 to F2019 Revenue Requirements Application. Decision and Order G-47-18

Further to your May 9, 2016 filing of intervener evidence, enclosed please find Commission Information Request No. 1.

SUMMARY OF APPLICATION

FortisBC Energy Inc. (FEI) Project No Demand Side Management Expenditures Plan (the Application) Errata dated September 20, 2018

SUBMISSION BRITISH COLUMBIA HYDRO AND POWER AUTHORITY F2017 TO F2019 REVENUE REQUIREMENTS APPLICATION

The following are the comments of Westcoast Energy Inc. ( Westcoast ) with respect to the referenced Application.

Environmental Appeal Board

IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15, (Schedule B);

Audited Financial Statements. March 31, 2007

November 8, Dear Mr. Wruck:

Cascade Pacific Power Corporation

International Project Management. prof.dr MILOŠ D. MILOVANČEVIĆ

2018/ /21 SERVICE PLAN

Canadian Office & Professional Employees Union, Local 378

AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER-AT-RISK

IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15, (Schedule B);

November 22, British Columbia Utilities Commission 6 th Floor, 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2N3

July 20, British Columbia Utilities Commission Sixth Floor 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2N3

July 21, 2017 File: PCAA/File # Marleau v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

ATCO Electric Ltd. Stage 2 Review of Decision D ATCO Electric Ltd Transmission General Tariff Application

CLASS EXEMPTION FOR BC HYDRO CUSTOMERS UNDER CERTAIN LEASE ARRANGEMENTS EXHIBIT A2-1

MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Environmental Appeal Board

BCUC INQUIRY RESPECTING SITE C A-4

FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL

Chapter. Acquisition of Leased Office Space

Hospital Appeal Board

DENVER BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS. Briefing Paper for Gross Reservoir Expansion 2018 Budget Update

Chapter 33 Coordinating the Use of Lean Across Ministries and Certain Other Agencies

~6A ([( City of Richmond. Report to Committee. If] Transportation []./ GP - 273

British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority

Re: Insurance Corporation of British Columbia Order G /Project No Revenue Requirements Application

Ontario Energy Board

Report on Pension Plans Registered in British Columbia AUGUST 2017

Transcription:

BRITISH C OLUMBIA U TILITIES C OMMISSION O RDER NUMBER C-10-07 SIXTH FLOOR, 900 HOWE STREET, BOX 250 VANCOUVER, B.C. V6Z 2N3 CANADA web site: http://www.bcuc.com TELEPHONE: (604) 660-4700 BC TOLL FREE: 1-800-663-1385 FACSIMILE: (604) 660-1102 IN THE MATTER OF the Utilities Commission Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, Chapter 473 and An Application by FortisBC Inc. for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the Ootischenia Substation Project BEFORE: A.W.K. Anderson, Panel Chair and Commissioner December 17, 2007 N.F. Nicholls, Commissioner WHEREAS: O R D E R A. On September 7, 2007, FortisBC Inc. ( FortisBC ) applied (the Application ) to the British Columbia Utilities Commission (the Commission ) for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity ( CPCN ) for the Ootischenia Substation Project ( the Project ); and B. FortisBC is proposing the Project as the preferred solution for the Castlegar area, as it has the lowest cost, provides both capacity and reliability backup through the planning horizon and is best able to balance the needs of stakeholders; and C. The Project has an estimated capital cost of approximately $8.16 million and includes the construction of a new substation and the transmission and distribution egress necessary to connect the substation into the existing network; and D. The Project is scheduled to commence in the fourth quarter of 2007 and to be completed by the end of 2008; and E. On September 18, 2007 the Commission by Order No. G-110-07, established an Oral Public Hearing for the regulatory review of the Application, commencing on Wednesday, November 14, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. in the Sandman Hotel in Castlegar, B.C.; and F. On October 23, 2007, FortisBC, based on the comprehensive public consultation undertaken in regard to this Project, requested an amendment to Order No. G-110-07 and submitted that this Application should be disposed by way of a written proceeding; and G. On October 30, 2007, the Commission issued Order No. G-131-07 amending the Oral Public Hearing to a written proceeding; and.../2

BRITISH C OLUMBIA U TILITIES C OMMISSION O RDER N UMBER C-10-07 2 H. The British Columbia Old Age Pensioners Organization et al., B.C. Coalition of People with Disabilities, Council of Senior Citizens Organizations, Federated Anti-Poverty Groups of B.C., and the Tenant Resource and Advisory Centre (collectively known as BCOAPO et al.) submission dated November 26, 2007 was the only Intervenor written submission filed on the Project; and I. The FortisBC Reply Submission dated December 3, 2007 completed the written review process; and J. The Commission has considered the Application, the related submissions and replies and has determined that the Project is in the public interest and that a CPCN should be issued to FortisBC for the Reasons for Decision attached to this Order. NOW THEREFORE pursuant to Sections 45 and 46 of the Utilities Commission Act, the Commission orders as follows: 1. A CPCN is granted to FortisBC for the Ootischenia Substation Project as set out in the Application. 2. FortisBC will file with the Commission Quarterly Progress Reports on the Project showing the planned vs. actual schedule, planned vs. actual costs, and any variances or difficulties that the Project may be encountering. The Quarterly Progress Reports will be filed within 30 days of the end of each reporting period. 3. The progress report format will be generally as set out in Appendix B to this Order. 4. FortisBC is directed to file with the Commission a Final Project Report as well as a Post-Implementation Report, as outlined in Appendix B, within six months of the end or substantial completion of the Project that provides a complete breakdown of the final costs of the Project, compares the final costs to those included in the Application, and provides an explanation and justification of variances. DATED at the City of Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia, this 18 th day of December 2007. BY ORDER Original signed by: Attachments A.W.K. Anderson, Panel Chair and Commissioner Order/C-10-07_FortisBC CPCN Ootischenia Substation Project Reasons for Decision

APPENDIX A Page 1 of 3 FORTISBC INC. Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity Application for the Ootischenia Substation Project REASONS FOR DECISION INTRODUCTION The FortisBC Inc. ( FortisBC ) Application for the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity ( CPCN ) for the Ootischenia Substation Project ( Project ) and the Commission process to review the Application are described in the Order that accompanies these Reasons for Decision. The Reasons for Decision will address two areas of particular interest to the Intervenor and the Commission Panel. PUBLIC CONSULTATION FortisBC submits that its public consultation has been comprehensive as described in Appendix E of its Application. FortisBC further advises that following the Open House on May 9 and 10, 2007 exit surveys were received from a number of attendees including three from landowners within a 500 metre radius of the proposed site, one of whom expressed a negative opinion (Exhibit B-1, p. 9; Exhibit B-1, Appendix E). FortisBC representatives have met with a group of Ootischenia community leaders, as discussed in the Application, to discuss possible alternate sites for the substation including the selected site; and FortisBC mailed a follow-up letter, included in Attachment E to the Application, to the Open House attendees identifying the sites investigated and the selected site. FortisBC received no comments in response to this letter (Exhibit B-3, Attachment E). On October 23, 2007, FortisBC submitted a request for an amendment to Order No. G-110-07, citing the comprehensive public consultation undertaken with respect to this Project, and proposed that the Application be addressed by way of a written proceeding (Exhibit B-3). The only party registering as an Intervenor, the British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre representing the British Columbia Old Age Pensioners Organization et al. ( BCOAPO ), advised that they were not opposed to this Application being dealt with through a written proceeding and suggested that FortisBC be required to notify residents of Castlegar and Ootischenia of this change in procedure; extend the time limit for interventions; and allow for an additional round of information requests (Exhibit C1-2). FortisBC submitted that the opportunity to participate in the process, including submission of Information Requests, has been made available and was not acted upon by area residents. On October 30, 2007, the Commission issued Order No. G-131-07 amending the oral hearing to a written proceeding (Exhibit A-3). Commission Determination Only BCOAPO registered as an Intervenor and filed a written submission on the Application and only the Ministry of Transportation registered as an Interested Party. The Commission received no Letters of Comment. The Commission Panel therefore concludes that the extensive public consultation undertaken by FortisBC was in the public interest as it significantly reduced the regulatory costs, and the need to hold an oral hearing was reduced to a written proceeding.

APPENDIX A Page 2 of 3 PROGRESSION OF COST ESTIMATES The Castlegar Substation Project was initially presented in the System Development Plan 2005-2024, Section 4.1.4.1, page 36 and Appendix C, page 2, at an unloaded cost not including Overhead and Allowance for Funds Used During Construction of $2.1 million ($2004). The project concept was different at that time, which essentially considered upgrading the capacity of the existing Castlegar Substation by installing a second transformer at the same location. Princeton Transformer 3 was to be refurbished and relocated to the Castlegar Substation site. The work was to be carried out during 2006 (Exhibit B-1, Appendix A, p. 1). The project was further updated in the 2006 Capital Expenditure Plan and 2006 System Development Plan Update, Section 2.1.3.1, page 11 and Appendix 2, page 42. Preliminary engineering assessment at this time indicated that the existing substation site would not be adequate to accommodate the second transformer and therefore an additional substation would be required. The project was reassessed as a new substation for $4.1 million and was deferred to 2007. However, FortisBC inadvertently omitted the costs for additional land requirements and the transmission and distribution upgrades that would be necessary to integrate the new substation into the system network (Exhibit B-1, Appendix A, p. 1). A further project update was submitted with the 2007-2008 Capital Expenditure Plan and 2007 System Development Plan Update, Section 2.1.3.1, page 14 and Appendix 2, page 44. The concept of commissioning a new substation at Castlegar remained unchanged; however, the refurbishment and reuse of Princeton Transformer 3 was no longer found to be practical. The project was re-assessed with relevant corrections for land and transmission and distribution requirements, and additional overhead loadings of $1.1 million, for a total cost of $6.38 million and was deferred to 2008. This cost estimate was based on 2006 dollars and did not consider the additional regulatory costs associated with the CPCN submission (Exhibit B-1, Appendix A, p. 1). The Application is for a project with an estimated cost of $8.16 million (as spent dollars ) likely to have a +/- 10 percent accuracy (Exhibit B-2, p. 32) and having a rate impact of 0.22 percent (Exhibit B-2, p. 12). The difference between the present estimate in the CPCN Application and the 2007-2008 Capital Plan is primarily attributable to the following: 1. Differential Substation Costs, 2. Planning / pre Engineering and Regulatory Costs, and 3. Differential Land Cost. BCOAPO requested that, in addition to any reporting requirements and prudency reviews, FortisBC be required to specifically address Project costs during the 2008 Annual Review and 2009 Revenue Requirements application (BCOAPO Final Submission, p. 2). Commission Determination The Commission accepts that the escalation of Project costs was largely due to a delay in Project schedule and significant changes in Project scope involving a new site, new transformer and land costs, and accepts the estimate of $8.16 million for the Project cost (less the amount included for an Oral Hearing). However, the Commission Panel is concerned about some aspects of the cost estimate escalation and finds it unreasonable that a utility would inadvertently omit key costs such as land, overhead, and transmission and distribution upgrades from its cost estimates.

APPENDIX A Page 3 of 3 The Commission Panel agrees with BCOAPO s submission regarding the further review of Project costs, and directs FortisBC to meet the reporting requirements contained in the accompanying Order and to address Project costs during the 2008 Annual Review and 2009 Revenue Requirements application.

APPENDIX B Page 1 of 2 FORTISBC INC. CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY APPLICATION FOR THE OOTISCHENIA SUBSTATION PROJECT PROJECT REPORT FORMAT Table of Contents 1. Project Status Quarterly 1.1 General Project Status 1.2 Major Accomplishments, Work Completed and Key Decisions Made 1.3 Project Challenges and Issues; Issues Currently Open, Date Opened, Dated Closed, Those Issues that are Past Due 1.4 Plans for Next Period 1.5 Site Photographs (if useful) 2. Project Earned Value Quarterly 2.1 Project S Curve showing the budget at completion, earned value, actual cost to date, planned value, estimate to completion, estimate at completion, cost variance, schedule variance, cost performance index, schedule performance index, status (average of cost performance index and schedule performance index). All values are to be shown throughout the duration of the project. 3. Project Schedule Quarterly 3.1 Project Milestone Summary Table with the planned finish date, actual finish date, variance in days, status 3.2 Procurement Summary with the planned finish date, actual finish date, variance in days, status 3.3 Contract Summary with the planned finish date, actual finish date, variance in days, status 3.5 Schedule Summary 3.5.1 Schedule Performance to Date 3.5.2 Schedule Difficulties and Variances 3.6 Scope Change Summary with Description of Request, Explanation for Request, Request Amount, Approved Amount, Deferred Amount, Reject Amount, Under Investigation Amount. 4. Project Costs Quarterly 4.1 Project Cost Summary including explanation of variances 4.2 Financial Summary including explanation of variances 5. Project Resource Management Quarterly 5.1 Engineering & Construction Resources (Manhours, Planned vs. Actual non-cumulative) both in chart and table format. Provide explanation for variance and corrective action taken. 6. Project Risks Quarterly 6.1 Project Risks including Risk Description & Explanation, Date Risk Originated, Date Risk Last Reviewed, Level/Severity of Risk, Mitigation Plan, Contingency Plan, Mitigation Cost Amount (including schedule delay), Contingency Reserve Amount Required, Total Contingency Reserve Required to Date, Contingency Reserve Remaining.

APPENDIX B Page 2 of 2 7. Post Project Implementation Review End of Project 7.1 Performance against Objectives and Outcomes Describe the actual performance of the project against planned in relation to the achievement of objectives, outcomes and target outcomes. 7.2 Performance against Outputs Describe the actual performance of the project against planned in relation to the delivery of outputs. 7.3 Performance against Budget Describe the actual performance of the project against planned in relation to the project budget. 7.4 Performance against Schedule Describe the actual performance of the project against planned in relation to the project schedule. 7.5 Lessons Learned 7.5.1 What worked well? Describe the project management and quality management processes that were perceived to be appropriate and/or effective for the project 7.5.2 What could be improved? Describe the project management and quality management processes that were perceived to be inappropriate and/or ineffective for the project, as reflected by the stakeholders and the project records/documentation. 7.6 Conclusions 7.6.1 Provide a summary of the conclusions drawn throughout the Report.