Toronto and Region Conservation Authority - Additional Information for the Long Term Accommodation Project

Similar documents
Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

Impacts from the July 8, 2013 Storm Event on the City of Toronto

PRESENT Maria Augimeri. Ronald Chopowick. THAT the Minutes of Meeting #3/16, held on October 14, 2016, be approved. CARRIED

Toronto & Region Conservation Authority (TRCA)

TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY

TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY

Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Financial Statements December 31, 2006

Financial Statements. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority. December 31, 2014

Budget/Audit Advisory Board Meeting #1/15

Planning and Growth Management Committee

Metrolinx-City of Toronto-Toronto Transit Commission Master Agreement for Light Rail Transit Projects

STAFF REPORT. central principle is to promote equity by recovering the cost of servicess from those

GM20.13 REPORT FOR ACTION SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS FINANCIAL IMPACT

Public Works & Infrastructure Committee. Executive Director, Engineering & Construction Services Director, Purchasing & Materials Management Division

January Ontario Financing Authority

Strategic Asset Management Policy

This authority will come into effect on January 1, Prior to that date, the City is required to complete the following two steps:

If you require this document in an alternative format please contact NVCA at or

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

Toronto Pooling Compensation for Social Housing Budget Strategy Follow up

Chairman and Members of the Planning and Development Committee. Thomas S. Mokrzycki, Commissioner of Planning and Building

TransformTO Short-term Strategies Business Case

2017 PROPERTY TAX RATIO POLICY

City of Kingston Report to Council Report Number

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2017

EX31.2al REPORT FOR ACTION

Toronto Transit Projects April 25, Jack Collins Vice President, Rapid Transit Implementation

Evergreen Brick Works Amendment to Credit Facilities Terms

5 Draft 2017 Development Charge Background Study and Proposed Bylaw

Purpose This policy outlines the methods the City will use to manage its Debt in accordance with the City s Guiding Principles.

DRAFT MULTI-YEAR Water and Wastewater & Treatment Budget December 17, ANNUAL UPDATE INVESTING IN OUR FUTURE. london.

Proposed Regional Budget

Additional City of Toronto Act Reporting Requirements as a Result of Recording of Tangible Capital Assets

Intergovernmental Funding in the Recommended Capital Budget and Plan

Deputy City Manager & Chief Financial Officer. P:\2016\Internal Services\Cf\Ec16003Cf (AFS # 22159)

Block 31 in the Railway Lands: Development Agreement, Update and Next Steps

REGIONAL EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PURPOSE 3.0 DEFINITIONS. Edmonton Metropolitan Region Planning Toolkit

EX22.2v REPORT FOR ACTION. TransformTO Short-term Strategies Financial Estimates SUMMARY

CATFISH CREEK CONSERVATION AUTHORITY. Financial Statements. December 31, 2009

P:\2014\Internal Services\rev\ec14021rev (AFS18865)

Municipal Land Transfer Tax Reduction Options

Municipal Natural Assets Initiative (MNAI): Watershed-level pilot implementation in British Columbia. Call for Expressions of Interest

Infrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services. Clair-Maltby Secondary Plan Phase One Report and Recommended Vision and Guiding Principles

Allen Road Individual Environmental Assessment (EA)

Township of Scugog Staff Report

National Energy Board Decision on Enbridge Line 9B Application Follow Up Actions

6 Draft 2018 Development Charge Background Study and Proposed Draft Bylaw Amendment

Report to Committee of the Whole

The Corporation of Haldimand County. Consolidated Financial Statements

Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund

RE:EX Toronto Water CAPITAL BUDGET NOTES CONTENTS CONTACTS CAPITAL BUDGET AND PLAN OVERVIEW. Overview

INDEX TO BUDGET/AUDIT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING #2/11. Friday, October 14, 2011

Implementing a Vacant Home Tax in Toronto

Big Chino Water Ranch Project Impact Analysis Prescott & Prescott Valley, Arizona

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 5, 2011

Capital Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, Deputy City Manager & Chief Financial Officer

Executive Summary Operating Budget and Forecast

Scarborough Subway Extension Project: Metrolinx Sunk Costs

TORONTO HYDRO CORPORATION MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

Proposed Amendments to the Minimum Dealer Regulation Fee Component of the Dealer Member Fee Model

The Regional Municipality of Halton. Chair and Members of the Planning and Public Works Committee

2019 CAPITAL BUDGET BRIEFING NOTE State of Good Repair (SOGR) Backlog

SUBJECT/REPORT NO: Ontario Ministry of Infrastructure Asset Management Plan Requirements (FCS13077/PW13077) (City Wide)

WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS

NOTICE OF DECISION CONSENT (Section 53 of the Planning Act)

Report to: General Committee Meeting Date: December 5, 2017

HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d.

Overview. Highland Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. R.C. Harris Water Treatment Plant

to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2006

Executive Summary Background... 8 Purpose... 8 Financial Goals, Strategies & Policies... 9 Key Challenges & Trends... 12

RE: An Environmental Assessment for the Lakeview Waterfront Connection. Proponents: Credit Valley Co~se rvat ion and the Region of Peel

CITY OF HAMILTON. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Growth Management Division Parking and By-law Services Division

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

MUNICIPALITY OF MISSISSIPPI MILLS. plan. December, 2016

Report to: Development Services Committee Date: June 26, 2017

EFFECTIVE: June 19, 2013 REPLACES: n/a PAGE: 1 of 11

For help accessing information in this document, please contact 311.

Planning and Building Table of Contents

EX30.5 REPORT FOR ACTION. Tax Policy Tools to Support Businesses SUMMARY

This report has been prepared in conjunction with the CEO of the TTC.

Reserves and Reserve Funds

CATFISH CREEK CONSERVATION AUTHORITY. Financial Statements. December 31, 2016

SAUGEEN VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY FINANCIAL REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2016

Britannia Village Flood Control Project

Background. Request for Decision. Proposed Changes to City's Development Charges By-Law and Rates. Recommendation. Presented: Tuesday, Apr 29, 2014

CITY OF BRAMPTON COMPREHENSIVE ZONING BY-LAW REVIEW. Technical Paper #3 Minor Variances

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING JANUARY 15, 2018

CITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in Policy and Finance Committee Report 4, which was considered by City Council on June 14, 2006.

Future of the City's Vacant Commercial and Industrial Tax Rebate Program

Financial Plan Water and Wastewater Lines of Service

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

Government Management Committee. P:\2011\InternalServices\RE\Gm11017re (AFS #13694)

Affordable Housing Office

The Bridges of Wellington County

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building

Region of Peel. BMO Canadian Fixed Income Conference. May 1 & 2, Spring

PLEASANT GROVE, UTAH TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN AND ANALYSIS

Content Copy Of Original

PRÉLÈVEMENTS 2018 DES OFFICES DE PROTECTION DE LA NATURE

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE: SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION CHARGE

Transcription:

REPORT FOR ACTION Toronto and Region Conservation Authority - Additional Information for the Long Term Accommodation Project Date: February 14, 2017 To: City Council From: Deputy City Manager & Chief Financial Officer Wards: Ward 8 SUMMARY This report responds to motions adopted on February 7th, 2017 by the Executive Committee at its special meeting for the 2017 Budget process held on February 7, 2017 requesting additional information on the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Long Term Accommodation Project. Through the Conservation Authorities Act, the TRCA has the authority to levy its member municipalities for the cost of programs and services including capital project costs. Costs are apportioned consistent with the Conservation Authorities Act among the municipalities within the watershed boundaries which include the City of Toronto, the Regions of York, Peel and Durham, Town of Mono and the Township of Adjala- Tosorontio. TRCA is requesting the City's support to construct a new head office building on its own land with a maximum total project cost of $70.000 million to be apportioned to its benefiting member municipalities according the CVA formula. The City's pro-rata share is $38.617 million and is included in the 2017 Executive Committee Recommended Capital Budget and 2018-2026 Capital Budget without additional debt requirements through a reallocation within the 2017-2025 Council Approved Capital Plan. A review of the available real estate within the City's and Build Toronto's portfolio determined that there are no suitable properties that meet the TRCA's accommodation needs and timelines. TRCA - Info for Long Term Accommodation Plan Page 1 of 11

RECOMMENDATIONS The Deputy City Manager & Chief Financial Officer recommends that: 1. Council receive this report for information. FINANCIAL IMPACT There is no financial impact arising from this information report. The City's pro-rata share of the total project cost of $70.000 million for the Head Office project in the amount of $38.617 million is included in the 2017 Executive Committee Recommended Capital Budget and 2018-2026 Capital Plan for the TRCA within the allocated debt targets. The Deputy City Manager & Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and concurs with the financial impact information. DECISION HISTORY As part of the 2017 Budget process, Executive Committee recommended that City Council adopt staff report titled "Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Long Term Accommodation Plan" recommending City Council's formal support of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) for its plan to construct a new administrative office building on land it owns in the City of Toronto. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority - Long Term Accommodation Plan (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-100751.pdf) Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Resolution http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-100752.pdf At its meeting on February 7th, 2017, Executive Committee requested that: 1. The City Manager report directly to City Council for its meeting of February 15, 2017 and February 16, 2017 with details and breakdown on the historical regional operational funding and representation formula of the Toronto and Regional Conservation Authority, along with the decision making timeline, including site selection and design which led to recommending the construction of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority $70.000 million administrative office; and 2. The City Manager be requested to meet with Build Toronto and the TRCA to explore all options to accommodate administration offices within City-owned properties and report directly to City Council at its meeting of February 15, 2017 and February 16, 2017 on the outcomes of these discussions. http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewagendaitemhistory.do?item=2017.ex22.2 TRCA - Info for Long Term Accommodation Plan Page 2 of 11

COMMENTS The City's relationship with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is governed by the Conservation Authorities Act. Its watershed authority boundary encompasses the City of Toronto, and parts of the Regions of Peel, York, Durham, the Town of Mono and the Township of Adjala-Tosorontio. Funding for Operating Costs The Conservation Authorities Act, administered by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF), enables two or more municipalities in a common watershed to establish a conservation authority in conjunction with the province. Further, the Conservation Authorities Act allows the conservation authority to levy for its Operating costs. Conservation Authorities use a modified Current Value Assessment formula, which weights different classes of property, as prescribed in the Regulations to the provincial Act. The modified calculation adds the CVA of all lands within the authority's jurisdiction and applies a range of tax ratio factors based on the property classes. The municipality's assessment calculation is then weighted according to the area occupied within the jurisdiction. The TRCA uses a further modification, permitted under the Act, to specifically accommodate equity in the funding of property taxes across its municipal partners and to take advantage of the differing amounts of operating levy support provided annually by each of the participating municipalities. This formula is used for the levy supporting costs of operations and maintenance of its facilities, and results in a slightly lower share for the City of Toronto, as seen in Table 1. (TRCA Modified CVA Calculation) Overall, however, under both formulas, the municipality within TRCA's watershed jurisdiction which has the highest proportion of overall assessment proportionately pays the highest share of TRCA's general benefiting (operating) costs. The City of Toronto has the highest share, arising from its proportional share of the total CVA assessment within the TRCA's watershed boundaries. TRCA - Info for Long Term Accommodation Plan Page 3 of 11

Chart 1 - Historical Regional Operational Funding (2006-2017) Total TRCA Operating Levy Toronto Share Year Toronto Regions Total TRCA Modified CVA Calculation Modified CVA Calculation per Regulations 2006 $6,606,524 $3,445,876 $10,052,400 65.72% 66.93% 2007 $6,849,210 $3,605,290 $10,454,500 65.51% 66.57% 2008 $7,063,000 $3,987,050 $11,050,050 63.92% 66.04% 2009 $7,297,942 $4,202,858 $11,500,800 63.46% 65.72% 2010 $7,476,327 $4,221,673 $11,698,000 63.91% 65.83% 2011 $7,476,396 $4,415,604 $11,892,000 62.87% 65.43% 2012 $7,476,355 $4,605,645 $12,082,000 61.88% 65.13% 2013 $7,666,494 $4,829,506 $12,496,000 61.35% 64.65% 2014 $7,858,337 $4,992,663 $12,851,000 61.15% 64.88% 2015 $8,054,000 $5,231,000 $13,285,000 60.62% 64.58% 2016 $8,187,300 $5,364,588 $13,551,888 60.41% 64.36% 2017 $8,392,300 $5,525,000 $13,917,300 60.30% 64.36% When capital costs are apportioned, and all partner municipalities benefit equally, the modified CVA calculation in accordance with the Conservation Authorities Act and Regulations is used. The 2017 CVA allocation is shown in Chart 2 below: Chart 2 - TRCA - Member Municipalities 2017 CVA Allocation Municipality Modified CVA Allocation per Regulation Adjala-Tosorontio 0.000067 Durham 0.028247 Mono 0.000080 Peel 0.113733 Toronto 0.643621 York 0.214252 Total Levy 1.0000 Funding for Capital Costs Through the Act, the TRCA can determine what funding is required for capital expenditures in connection with any project and request each participating municipality TRCA - Info for Long Term Accommodation Plan Page 4 of 11

to support the project in the same proportion as the benefit derived by each municipality. Historically, capital projects that relate to the ongoing operations of the TRCA such as major retrofits to administrative buildings and technology projects have been apportioned according to the modified CVA formula, (as referenced in the chart on the previous page). Capital projects that are geographically located within the City of Toronto such as infrastructure improvements to Black Creek Pioneer Village and erosion control works are fully funded by the City. Similarly, watershed projects geographically located outside of the City of Toronto are funded by the respective municipal jurisdiction. The City's Capital Budget for TRCA is funded from a combination of tax supported debt and the water rate. The 2017-2026 Executive Committee Recommended Capital Budget and Plan is comprised of $38.000 million of debt funding or 20.7% and $145.894 million or 79.3% from Toronto Water. The latter is comprised of $47.897 million for projects related to water quality and $98.000 million for projects that will address critical erosion control. As the TRCA is governed under the Conservation Authorities Act, it does not meet the definition of a board or agency of the City and as a result, its capital projects cannot be directly funded by Development Charges or any funds collected under the Planning Act for the City of Toronto. Appeals Process under the Conservation Authorities Act Administration costs, as defined, must be levied using modified CVA by the TRCA against its participating municipalities. Maintenance costs, as defined, can be apportioned on the basis of the benefit derived by each municipality either (i) by agreement amongst the authority and the municipalities or (ii) in accordance with the ratio which each participating municipality's modified assessment bears to the total authority's modified assessment. TRCA apportions maintenance costs on the basis of (ii) above, producing a variation from the pure application of modified CVA as shown in Chart 1 above. Modified current value assessment is calculated in accordance with Ontario Regulation 670/00 {by the following formula: [area of the municipality within the conservation authority's jurisdiction / the municipality's total area] x [total current value assessment within the municipality x prescribed factor]}. Municipalities may appeal operating and maintenance levies to the Mining and Lands Commissioner appointed under the Ministry of Natural Resources Act within 30 days of receipt of notice of the levy. The decision of the Commissioner is final. Capital cost levies must be in accordance with the proportion of the total benefit of the capital project apportioned to the participating municipality by the TRCA. If the municipal council disagrees with the apportionment of the benefit of the capital project apportioned to it, it may appeal the apportionment of the benefit to the Ontario Municipal Board within 30 days of receipt of the notice of apportionment. A levy based on the final apportioned benefit, however, is final and is a debt due by the municipality. TRCA - Info for Long Term Accommodation Plan Page 5 of 11

The Conservation Authorities Act Review - Capital Funding Requests The Province of Ontario has initiated a review of the Conservation Authorities Act. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry has developed a discussion paper and invited feedback on any aspect of the existing legislative and regulatory framework including the funding mechanisms. In response to the discussion paper, TRCA and its member municipalities have requested additional financial support specifically for capital projects, which historically have been underfunded. Funding for infrastructure repair has not kept pace with emerging needs. Urban expansion and intensification projects in the Greater Toronto Area will continue to compromise natural features, communities and processes. As the effects of climate change progress, the number of sites requiring restoration and/or regeneration is anticipated to increase. All parties will continue to participate in the development of the framework and should the province provide any additional funding support pertaining to the capital project for the head office, the TRCA will reduce costs borne by its member municipalities. Term Accommodation Project - Administrative Office Building The administration building has a maximum project cost of $70.000 million inclusive of contingencies and indirect support costs. To reduce the term of the municipal contributions, TRCA is working to secure other funding sources to supplement project funding. The TRCA proposes to fund the project in the following manner: Land Disposition Funds (TRCA and Provincial sources) Project Financing (Funded by TRCA member municipalities) TOTAL $10.000 million $60.000 million $70.000 million The total project cost includes all associated costs for the construction of the building including an underground parking garage along with any administrative approval requirements, geographical and/or environmental modifications as on-site remediation; the re-design of the street intersection to access the building; and access requirements for neighbouring properties. Traditionally, the TRCA would levy its members directly for the total project cost upfront and each benefiting municipality would be responsible to raise the required capital, i.e. the issuance of debentures or otherwise provide equity funds. However, in performing their due diligence on the head office project, TRCA spoke to each of their member municipalities and determined that it would be more advantageous for TRCA to secure the debt, in order to provide the municipalities with funding assistance and relief with their debt targets. The preliminary interest rate that TRCA has received by their financial institution is consistent with the financing costs that could be secured by the City of Toronto. The TRCA will also explore the possibility of obtaining a lower rate through a competitive RFP process for financing. All other partner municipalities have approved their pro-rata share of this project. TRCA requires the City's support to seek provincial approval. Once the project is TRCA - Info for Long Term Accommodation Plan Page 6 of 11

approved by the Province, the TRCA will further explore all initiatives to find efficiencies, synergies and costs savings, including partnership opportunities pertaining to the design, build, operation and maintenance of the head office. This process will include participation from its member municipalities including the City's Real Estate Division and Build Toronto. Any cost savings realized from this process will be transferred directly to the member municipalities, through a reduced amortization schedule. The City evaluated the business case presented by the TRCA using the maximum projected total costs of $70.000 million and confirmed that the build option was the most cost effective. If the construction costs were to be further reduced through any of the above initiatives, the build option would become even more financially advantageous. The following chart shows the maximum contribution allocation amongst the member municipalities, in accordance with the CVA calculation. Chart 3 - TRCA Member Municipalities Share of Project Financing Costs Municipality $ share % of Total Adjala-Tosorontio 4,020 0.0067% Durham 1,694,820 2.8247% Mono 4,800 0.0008% Peel 6,823,980 11.37% Toronto 38,617,260 64.36% York 12,855,120 21.43% Total Levy 60,000,000 100% Land Disposition Funds (TRCA and Provincial sources) 10,000,000 Total Project Cost including Contingencies 70,000,000 The City of Toronto's contribution to this project of $38.617 million has been accommodated within the 2017 Executive Committee Recommended Capital Budget and 2018-2026 Capital Plan and future years Capital Plans at the same level of funding as the previous 2016-2025 Council Approved Capital Plan as funds have been reallocated. The City will not incur any additional debt charges as a result of including this project in the Capital Plan and as such, the head office project will not defer any planned major critical erosion control projects. TRCA - Info for Long Term Accommodation Plan Page 7 of 11

Through the Conservation Authorities Act, the TRCA has the authority to levy its member municipalities for payment of the capital costs incurred, thereby imposing a charge for this project. Notwithstanding, the TRCA is seeking approval of the project from each partner municipality in advance of all 2017 levies. Project Development Chronology TRCA has been seeking a long term solution to its office accommodation needs since 2003. A detailed timeline of the Authority's decisions along with references to the meeting minutes is available in Attachment 1. Staffing levels have grown considerably since its main office at 5 Shoreham Drive was constructed in the early 1970s. This increase has largely occurred to meet increased service level demands and the growth in the volume of work which include: Increased volume in development applications and reviews Expanded need to address flooding and storm water management concerns Emergency preparedness and resilience planning to maintain infrastructure Acquisition of additional assets including parkland space Addressing the impacts of recent extreme weather events A planned conservative annual growth rate of 3% (TRCA s historic 10 year average is 3.8%) In response to the office space concerns, the TRCA formed a Long Term Office Accommodation Working Group in 2008 consisting of TRCA member representatives of participating municipalities. The working group was tasked with finding a solution to its office accommodation needs and looked at ways to achieve the needed space as well as meet the expected growth over the next 30 years. Options considered included: 1. Build as a separate structure or as an addition to an existing office space 2. Lease space 3. Buy space in a building at a suitable location TRCA s long-term goal is to consolidate staff currently in multiple facilities to one central location to reduce travel time between TRCA offices, and allow resource and staff sharing. In 2015, TRCA retained an external consultant to prepare an integrated conceptual development plans for a new head office facility on the 5 Shoreham Drive property. Through this review, TRCA developed the business case for the construction of a dedicated building on TRCA-owned lands. TRCA's business case analysis included the consolidation of life cycle costs for each accommodation option and a commercial office space review undertaken by Commercial Real Estate Services Canada (CBRE) of the Toronto region, to assess any opportunities that may be suitable for TRCA. The analysis concluded with the following: 1. Constructing a new office at 5 Shoreham Drive in Toronto, on TRCA owned lands, presents the lowest cost option with the greatest long-term benefits. 2. Continuing to lease would result in higher long-term costs to the member municipalities to fund TRCA's office accommodation needs. TRCA - Info for Long Term Accommodation Plan Page 8 of 11

Furthermore, a purpose-built facility will allow TRCA to provide optimal customer service and support; achieve accommodation standards for staff comparable to our regional and municipal partners; provide a positive influence on staff retention; and ensure that the office can accommodate growth from development activities. As part of the 2017 Capital Budget process, the business case prepared by TRCA in support of its long term accommodation needs was submitted to the City's Deputy City Manager & Chief Financial Officer for review and comments. City staff reviewed the business case analysis presented by the TRCA which examined the relative costs, benefits and risks associated with various build, buy or lease of office space scenarios and confirmed that the option to build on its own land is the most cost effective solution. $204 $4.0 140.0 TRCA ACCOMMODATION OPTION LIFE CYCLE COSTS - $NPV millions $125.8 120.0 100.0 80.0 $97.3 $45.1 $97.6 $50.0 $108 $56.4 $74.2 Maintenance 60.0 Leasing Operating 40.0 $46.0 $43.6 $43.6 $43.6 Construction 20.0 0.0 $4.0 $8.0 $8.0 BUILD - OWN LEASE -low LEASE - med LEASE - high Note: discounting to current dollars shows today's cost for each option. Actual costs occur in the future year that they are incurred. Example the $70 million cost to construct a new building between the future years 2019-2021, carries debt servicing costs into the future that when discounted back to 2016 dollars equates to $46 million. Build Toronto - Investigating City-Owned Properties At the request of Executive Committee, a meeting was held on February 9th, 2017 with Build Toronto, the staff from the Office of the Chief Financial Officer, City's Real Estate Division and the TRCA to discuss potential options to accommodate the TRCA offices within City-owned properties. The meeting was held to determine, prior to the adoption of the 2017 Capital Budget, whether inventory was available within the Build Toronto or the City's real estate portfolio that would meet the accommodation requirements of the TRCA. The following key criteria for the TRCA were considered: 1. A suitable size to accommodate the current staff and potential future growth TRCA - Info for Long Term Accommodation Plan Page 9 of 11

2, A location in the north-west end of the City of Toronto and central to the TRCA jurisdiction 3. Convenient and regional access to 400 series highways 4. Access to well serviced by public transit, preferably a subway 5. 100% asset ownership (in recognition of other member municipalities) 6. Delivery by 2021 to align with the expiry of the current lease agreement The proposed TRCA construction project at 5 Shoreham Drive currently meets all of the above key criteria. Staff from Build Toronto and the City's Real Estate Division have confirmed that there are no suitable properties in its existing portfolio that would adequately meet the TRCA's requirements. In terms of upcoming Build Toronto projects, two options were considered: Location 50 Wilson Heights Blvd (North East corner of the Allen Road and Wilson Avenue 1035 Sheppard Avenue (South East corner of Sheppard and the Allen Rd) Earliest Available Date to begin Construction 2018 2019 Development at the above locations would not offer significant savings or benefits over the TRCA's proposal to build at 5 Shoreham Drive. Both these sites can be connected directly to the subway. However, due to the requirement for high density around subway sites, Build Toronto will sell the land as a strata title block. As a result, the 100,000 square feet required for the TRCA offices would be part of larger built form. These same locations were also considered at a meeting held with TRCA and Build Toronto in September 2016, as part of background reviews for the current proposal. In summary, offering any of these locations to the TRCA requires a complex transaction likely with a third party developer to achieve the overall objective for land value maximization and may still result in additional financial and opportunity costs to the City. Further, there would be additional risks to the schedule as completing the preconstruction sales and approvals for residential and other development intended for this property would likely cause delays to the start of the TRCA building. In order to benefit from Build Toronto s knowledge in the construction of sustainable office buildings, TRCA has asked Build Toronto to advise its organization throughout the construction process. This will ensure that TRCA and its partner municipalities receive value-for-money and help the organization how to best take the design, build, finance, operate, maintain components to market. Although the official capacity will be determined at a later date, this beneficial role was agreed upon in principle at the meeting on February 9, 2017. TRCA - Info for Long Term Accommodation Plan Page 10 of 11

Further to the continued oversight by the City, all of the steps toward actual construction will be governed by TRCA's Board which has 14 Toronto representatives including 9 councillors and reporting to the City will take place on a quarterly basis. Conclusion The Deputy City Manager & Chief Financial Officer has reviewed the TRCA proposal and other potential options from the City and Build Toronto and has concluded that the construction at the 5 Shoreham Drive location meets the objectives of both the City of Toronto and its partner municipalities. The cost sharing formula used to apportion costs among the partner municipalities is consistent with the Act and appropriate. The City of Toronto has accommodated the funding for this project within the 2017-2026 Capital Plan and the Council approved debt targets. The City of Toronto concurs with the findings of the TRCA's business case for the construction of the building on their own land at 5 Shoreham Drive. As a Green Project, this project will provide an opportunity for the TRCA to showcase the goals and objectives of the Climate Change Mitigation and Low Carbon Economy Act (Climate Act). This project is consistent with the City's objectives in TransformTO to support clean energy, green technologies and a transition to low carbon communities. TRCA will continue to work with the City of Toronto, Build Toronto and the partner municipalities to establish performance targets for the completion of this project to ensure that the City's overall objectives for capital investment are met. CONTACT Josie La Vita, Executive Director, Financial Planning Tel: 416-397-4229, E-mail: josie.lavita@toronto.ca SIGNATURE Roberto Rossini Deputy City Manager & Chief Financial Officer ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 - TRCA Decision History TRCA - Info for Long Term Accommodation Plan Page 11 of 11