School District Revenue History

Similar documents
A History of the School Operating Levy Referendum

Dianne Easterling, Coordinator Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education October, 2017

Financing Education In Minnesota A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools Funding Scenarios. Board of Education May 2, 2016

Operating Referendum: Background Information and Trends Round Lake-Brewster Public Schools

5 Year Budget Forecast

Update of An Estimate of the State Intergovernmental Aid Costs of Tax Increment Financing

Understanding the K-12 General Education Funding Program

Financing Education In Minnesota A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department

SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING UPDATE Senate Committee on E-12 Policy

Explanation of Special Education Forecast Change: February 2018 versus November 2017

20 Years of School Funding Post-DeRolph Ohio Education Policy Institute August 2018

MMSD Current Working. Baird Budget Forecast Model TAX LEVY SUMMARY. Levy and Misc. Copyright Robert W. Baird & Co. 7/7/2016

Worthington City School District

State Education Funding Accounting Shifts

BROOKLYN CENTER SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING FOR TAXES PAYABLE December 14, 2015 Presented by: Sara Bratsch Finance Director

5 Year Financial Projection FY2019 FY2023. December 21, 2017

Citizen s Guide. to School District Finances. Osseo Area Schools Fiscal Year 2013 ( School Year)

Fridley Public Schools, ISD 14

State Aid. School Funding Reform Act of 2008

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO Levy Certification

Bellefontaine City School District. Fiscal Year Five Year Forecast

FY 2018 CITIZEN S GUIDE

CITIZEN S GUIDE TO SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCES. Osseo Area Schools FISCAL YEAR 2010 ( School Year)

FY 2017 CITIZEN S GUIDE

St. Francis Area Schools

Cash Balance June 30 15,940,136 15,271,647 13,479,243 12,241,640 11,698,295 10,837,831 9,756,394 8,379,673

Taxation Hearing Eastern Carver County Schools December 12, 2013

Background. Program overview 12/9/2014. Andrew Paquette, President, TMS Chris Desjardins, Senior Finance Analyst, TMS

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP) AN OVERVIEW OF HOW THE FORMULA IS CALCULATED

Senate Bill 175. Denise Ulberg, Executive Director MASBO 2013 MCEL Conference Billings Hotel October 17, 2013

Chapter 70 Aid. FY14 Budget 7/12/2013

Springboro Community City School District

Shaping our Future Together. Northfield Sanbornton Tilton

Does the Ag-Science program cost the taxpayers of Bethlehem and Woodbury?

Tipp City Exempted Village School District FIVE YEAR FORECAST July 1, 2014 June 30, 2019

Financial Readiness for Board Members

School Funding AN OVERVIEW OF HOW OHIO FUNDS ITS SCHOOLS. Legislative Service Commission March 2017

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

School Finance Update

2017 Proposed Property Tax Levy

Durham Public Schools FY BUDGET RESOLUTION

Chatfield Public School

PUBLIC HEARING BUDGET AND PROPOSED 2017 PROPERTY TAXES. Staples-Motley ISD 2170 Information on Changes to School Property Taxes.

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Riverside Local School District

Chatfield Public School

for Truth regional brief Does Stanly Need a Sales-Tax Increase? County already has $23 million in available funds

The District s mission statement, which reflects the highest aspirations of the St. Cloud Area School District, states:

FY SUMMARY BUDGET

BRAINERD PUBLIC SCHOOLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 181 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

CEDAR FALLS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. 2017/18 Budget Presentation

SENATE No STATE OF NEW JERSEY 209th LEGISLATURE

Proposed budget

FY SUMMARY BUDGET

River Forest Community School Corporation. Forging Ingots Together

MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (MD&A)

Springboro Community City School District

PUBLIC HEARING: FY18 BUDGET March 21, 2017

HISTORICAL COMPARISON OF STATEWIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT PERSONNEL TABLE 1: ANNUALIZED AVERAGE SALARIES AND PER CAPITA INCOME

FY18-19 School Funding Overview. FY16-17 Funding Formula

LANCASTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT - - FAIRFIELD COUNTY IRN:

Harrison Central School District Proposed Budget Adopted April 19, Annual Budget Hearing May 3, 2017

Minneapolis Public Schools Special School District No. 1 Minneapolis, Minnesota. Financial Statements. June 30, 2017

School Finance Update

August 2014 Financial Statements

Paint Valley Local School District

Harrison Central School District Superintendent s Proposed Budget for Adoption. Board of Education Meeting April 19, 2017

Miami County, Ohio FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST NOTES AND ASSUMPTIONS. For the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2013 through 2017

FINANCIAL REPORT NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED FOR EXCELLENCE

Cleveland Municipal School District

What does it all. mean?!?

Fund Revenue Expenditure Fund Balance. General $ 127,122,457 $ 128,759,941 $ (1,637,484) Food Service 5,910,702 6,117,537 (206,835)

GLOSSARY OF SCHOOL FINANCE TERMS

If you need further assistance, contact the OPI school budgeting staff: Kara Sperle , Paul Taylor , or Mari Haefka

Truth in Taxation 2018 Proposed Property Tax Levy. Monticello Public Schools District Office December 4, :00 pm

LaCrescent-Hokah School District

HARTLAND-LAKESIDE JT. #3 SCHOOL DISTRICT

Marietta City School District Assumptions for October year Forecast

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Madison College District FY16 Budget Presentation

Proposed Budget. Presented: March 18, 2013

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

Section One Statewide Average Financial Tables and Charts

Fiscal Year 2016 Superintendent s Proposed Operating Budget Board of Education of Charles County Public Schools January 13, 2015

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 719

January Interest Rate Protection Agreements A Progress Report

School District of Philadelphia

Parnassus Preparatory School Long Range Budget Projection Model March 24, 2017

The property tax is the predominant method communities use to raise additional revenues in Ohio. The property tax comes in two forms:

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

LCFF LCAP. Local Control Accountability Plan

Hopkins School Board Workshop Eisenhower Community Center Boardroom 4 p.m. November 20, 2018

Independent School District 622 Proposed Budget General Fund Fund 01

November 2012 Financial Statements. Puyallup School District. Key Messages. Table of Contents

Five Year Forecast Financial Report

OVERVIEW MINNESOTA PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM AND SCHOOL DISTRICT LEVY PROCESS Payable 2006 Levy

Financial Readiness for Board Members

Ann Arbor Public Schools Budget Update. April 2012

Transcription:

School District Revenue History Money Matters: Number 06.03 February 2006 Greg Crowe, Fiscal Analyst (651) 296-7165 Tim Strom, Legislative Analyst (651) 296-1886 Fiscal Analysis Department Minnesota House of Representatives

School District Revenues, - Total School District Revenue, - In fiscal year, total school district revenue including State, Local and Federal sources was $2.7 billion 1. By fiscal year, total school district revenue had increased more than 222 percent, to $8.6 billion, an average annual increase of over 11 percent per year. At the same time, school districts are concerned that their current revenues are not adequate to cover their expenses. This analysis will attempt to shed some light on how increases that can be viewed as large over time can result in the kind of concern expressed by districts today. Two initial adjustments to total revenue should be made to better explain what school districts are receiving in actual revenue. The first is adjusting for inflation (using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in this case, with as the base year) and the second is adjusting for pupil growth. As Figure 1 shows, while total school revenue nearly tripled, when adjusted for inflation the increase is only about 78 percent, from $2.7 billion to $4.8 billion, or 4 percent per year. $10,000,000 School District Total Revenue $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 Total Revenue Total Revenue, Inflation Adjusted Figure 1 1 School district revenue is calculated using the annual Price of Government report prepared by the Department of Finance. In comparison to most other work produced by our Department, which focus primarily on state aid on an appropriation basis and local levies, the Price of Government data includes state aid on an entitlement basis (which eliminates the impact of accounting shifts on annual appropriations), local levies, other local revenue including local fees, and federal funds. Page 2

School District Revenues, - In addition to adjusting for inflation, to truly understand what is happening to school district revenues over time, changes in enrollment should be factored out. Since most K-12 funding formulas are based on the number of students enrolled in a school district, changes in enrollment can change the total revenue of the school district without actually increasing or decreasing the district s per pupil revenue. So, Figure 2 shows actual total revenue and total revenue adjusted for inflation on a per student basis (using a headcount measure called Average Daily Membership (ADM)). School District Revenue Per Student $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 Revenue per Student Inflation Adjusted Revenue per Student Figure 2 Figure 2 shows that in fiscal year, total school district revenue per student including State, Local and Federal sources was $3,808. By fiscal year, total actual school district revenue had increased more than 172 percent, to $10,353 per student, an average annual increase of over 8.6 percent per year. When adjusted for inflation, fiscal year revenue is $5,724 per student, an increase of 52 percent over the 20 year period, or an average of 2.5 percent per year. In addition to adjusting for inflation and changes in enrollment, when observing changes in operating revenue over time, it is useful to subtract non-operating expenditures, particularly the debt payments that school districts make for their building construction costs. Fluctuations in building debt over time and between districts do little to explain the ability of districts to fund their operating expenses. As a result, Figure 3 shows school district revenue with building debt subtracted from total revenue. In addition, Figure 3 also makes an adjustment for special education expenditures. Because special education is a fixed cost in the sense that services are Page 3

School District Revenues, - mandated by Federal and State law and revenue is calculated based on reimbursing only a portion of the cost of providing services, the addition or loss of special education revenue does not influence the ability of the district to provide regular instruction. However, when special education services are added by a district, because the special education funding formulas do not fully fund special education costs, a district then has to subsidize special education expenditures out of their general education funding. In other words, the higher a school district s special education expenditures are, the greater the subsidy of those expenditures is from the general fund. School District Revenue Per Student $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 Revenue Per Student Revenue Per Student Less Building Debt Revenue Per Student Less Debt and Special Education Figure 3 Subtracting building debt and special education expenditures, school district revenue increases from $3,305 per student to $7,679 per student between fiscal years and, an increase of 132 percent, an average of 6.6 percent per year. In fiscal year, building debt averaged $183 per pupil and special education averaged $320 per pupil. By fiscal year, building debt averaged $1,262 per pupil and special education averaged $1,412 per pupil. Page 4

School District Revenues, - Figure 4 shows the result of subtracting building debt and special education expenditures from school district revenue, and then adjusting those amounts for inflation. Subtracting building debt and special education expenditures, and adjusting for inflation, school district revenue increases from $3,305 per student to $4,246 per student between fiscal years and, an increase of 29 percent, an average of 1.4 percent per year. $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 School District Revenue Per Student Inflation Adjusted 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 Revenue Per Student Revenue Per Student Less Building Debt Revenue Per Student Less Debt and Special Education Figure 4 Clearly, Figures 1 and 4 present very different perspectives on how school district revenues have changed over the past 20 years. Figure 1 shows education funding increasing by 222 percent over 20 years at an 11 percent per year average, while Figure 4 shows education funding increasing by 29 percent, an average of 1.4 percent per year. The differences between the two are the adjustments made for student enrollment, inflation, and district costs for building debt and special education. While markedly different, each analysis represents an accurate way to view school funding over time, and each presents unique perspectives that should be considered. A simple analysis of total actual revenue change over time does not consider factors that are beyond the control of school districts and important in calculating their relative financial position over time. For additional information, please contact: Greg Crowe, Education Fiscal Analyst, at (651) 296-7165 or greg.crowe@house.mn, or; Tim Strom, Education Legislative Analyst, at (651) 296-1886 or tim.strom@house.mn Page 5

School District Total Revenue, FY -FY Includes State Aid Entitlements, Local Levies, Other Local Revenue and Federal Funds ($ in Thousands) Total Total Revenue * Revenue * Infl. Adj. 2,666,098 2,666,098 1985 2,804,734 5.2% 2,707,324 1.5% 3,032,702 8.1% 2,878,864 6.3% 1987 3,248,698 7.1% 2,970,299 3.2% 3,453,999 6.3% 3,040,064 2.3% 1989 3,654,168 5.8% 3,057,200 0.6% 3,956,375 8.3% 3,164,367 3.5% 1991 4,313,020 9.0% 3,291,081 4.0% 4,570,628 6.0% 3,382,864 2.8% 1993 4,824,332 5.6% 3,463,784 2.4% 5,155,154 6.9% 3,614,203 4.3% 1995 5,612,647 8.9% 3,820,858 5.7% 5,861,361 4.4% 3,884,952 1.7% 1997 6,040,025 3.0% 3,894,611 0.2% 6,425,890 6.4% 4,069,231 4.5% 1999 6,716,761 4.5% 4,182,214 2.8% 7,123,703 6.1% 4,311,230 3.1% 2001 7,604,974 6.8% 4,448,508 3.2% 7,861,745 3.4% 4,517,926 1.6% 2003 8,356,912 6.3% 4,703,480 4.1% 8,596,311 2.9% 4,752,756 1.0% - Percent Change 222% 78.3% Average Change 11.1% 3.9% Avg of Annual Changes * 6.0% 2.9% School District Revenues, - APPENDIX: DATA TABLES School District Total Revenue per Student, FY -FY Includes State Aid Entitlements, Local Levies, Other Local Revenue and Federal Funds Total Rev. Rev/Student Rev/Student Rev/Student Infl. Adj per Inflation Minus Infl. Adj Minus Bldg Less Bldg Student Adj Bldg. Debt Less Bldg and Sp.Ed. & Sp.Ed. 3,808 3,808 3,625 3,625 3,305 3,305 1985 4,031 5.9% 3,891 2.2% 3,841 6.0% 3,708 2.3% 3,483 5.4% 3,362 1.7% 4,337 7.6% 4,117 5.8% 4,124 7.4% 3,915 5.6% 3,728 7.0% 3,539 5.3% 1987 4,586 5.7% 4,193 1.8% 4,368 5.9% 3,994 2.0% 3,911 4.9% 3,576 1.0% 4,823 5.2% 4,245 1.2% 4,640 6.2% 4,084 2.3% 4,135 5.7% 3,639 1.8% 1989 5,050 4.7% 4,225-0.5% 4,859 4.7% 4,065-0.5% 4,282 3.6% 3,582-1.6% 5,395 6.8% 4,315 2.1% 5,189 6.8% 4,150 2.1% 4,553 6.3% 3,642 1.7% 1991 5,744 6.5% 4,383 1.6% 5,521 6.4% 4,213 1.5% 4,807 5.6% 3,668 0.7% 5,953 3.6% 4,406 0.5% 5,716 3.5% 4,231 0.4% 4,936 2.7% 3,653-0.4% 1993 6,145 3.2% 4,412 0.1% 5,888 3.0% 4,227-0.1% 5,060 2.5% 3,633-0.5% 6,450 5.0% 4,522 2.5% 6,152 4.5% 4,313 2.0% 5,279 4.3% 3,701 1.9% 1995 6,907 7.1% 4,702 4.0% 6,543 6.4% 4,454 3.3% 5,586 5.8% 3,803 2.8% 7,082 2.5% 4,694-0.2% 6,715 2.6% 4,451-0.1% 5,866 5.0% 3,888 2.2% 1997 7,241 2.2% 4,669-0.5% 6,677-0.6% 4,305-3.3% 5,765-1.7% 3,717-4.4% 7,722 6.6% 4,890 4.7% 7,055 5.7% 4,468 3.8% 6,117 6.1% 3,874 4.2% 1999 7,990 3.5% 4,975 1.7% 7,277 3.1% 4,531 1.4% 6,280 2.7% 3,910 0.9% 8,508 6.5% 5,149 3.5% 7,803 7.2% 4,723 4.2% 6,723 7.1% 4,069 4.1% 2001 9,088 6.8% 5,316 3.2% 8,308 6.5% 4,860 2.9% 7,144 6.3% 4,179 2.7% 9,381 3.2% 5,391 1.4% 8,373 0.8% 4,812-1.0% 7,135-0.1% 4,100-1.9% 2003 9,996 6.6% 5,626 4.4% 8,580 2.5% 4,829 0.4% 7,272 1.9% 4,093-0.2% 10,353 3.6% 5,724 1.7% 9,091 6.0% 5,026 4.1% 7,679 5.6% 4,246 3.7% - Percent Change 172% 50.3% 150.8% 38.6% 132.3% 28.5% Average Change 8.6% 2.5% 7.5% 1.9% 6.6% 1.4% Avg of Annual Changes * 5.1% 2.1% 4.7% 1.7% 4.3% 1.3% * The Average Change compares to, and divides by the 20-year increment. The average of the annual change computes the average of each year's annual change. Page 6