Lesson 3 Experience Rating

Similar documents
ABCs of Experience Rating

Understanding Worker s Compensation

RE: New York Workers Compensation Experience Rating Plan Revisions Effective October 1, 2013

Benefits of having a Return-to-Work program. Andrew Justice, Underwriting Analyst

Experience Rating: Understanding the Basics

MASSACHUSETTS Experience Rating Plan Manual 2003 Edition Page 1

WCIRBCalifornia. California Workers Compensation Experience Rating Overview

Florida Office of Insurance Regulation I-File Workflow System. Filing Number: Request Type: Entire Filing

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Table IV - Unit Statistical Data

Your Experience Modification Factor Why is this Important for You? Presented by: Colburn Group

State of Florida Office of Insurance Regulation Financial Services Commission

Data Collection Agency Workers Compensation Insurances Statewide Average Pure Premium Michigan (2018)

Data Collection Agency Workers Compensation Insurances Statewide Average Pure Premium Michigan (2016)

Data Collection Agency Workers Compensation Insurances Statewide Average Pure Premium Michigan (2017)

Assigned Risk Rates and Rating Values for the Michigan Workers' Compensation Placement Facility (2018)

Assigned Risk Rates and Rating Values for the Michigan Workers' Compensation Placement Facility (2013)

Barbara Thurston, FCAS, MAAA Actuary and Risk Administrator, APEI

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU NCCI Filing Memorandum

TML = Actual losses of the employer for the experience period as reduced in accordance with the maximum value.

California Insolvent Insurer Rating Adjustment Plan Effective January 1, 2014

August 20, 2014 PCRB CIRCULAR NO RE: APPROVAL OF PCRB FILING NO. 259

Antitrust Notice. Copyright 2010 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The Honorable Teresa D. Miller, Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner. John R. Pedrick, FCAS, MAAA, Vice President Actuarial Services

Proposed 2019 Changes to Experience Rating

WCIRB Mod Talks 2019 Experience Rating Plan Treatment of Exception Claims April 26, 2018

Experience Rating Eligibility/Qualification

Actuarial Memorandum: F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing

WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting

MINNESOTA WORKERS' COMPENSATION. Assigned Risk Plan Rates Effective New and Renewal January 1, 2019

PCRB CIRCULAR NO. 1655

Workers Compensation. Nationwide Insurance Agribusiness Division Risk Management Services

Increase Profitability by Controlling Insurance Premiums

The Regulatory Filing Process

WCIRB Mod Talks 2019 Experience Rating Plan How the New Plan Will Work

ACORD 130 FL (2015/02) - FLORIDA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPLICATION

Introduction to Financial Data Reporting. Page 1 of 20

Section A Summary of Revision

CIRCULAR LETTER No MASSACHUSETTS SPECIAL PROGRAM: TERRORISM RISK INSURANCE ACT 2002

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU NCCI Filing Memorandum

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE 300 Capitol Mall, 17 th Floor Sacramento, CA PROPOSED DECISION

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD Loss Cost Revision

New York Workers Compensation Domestic Terrorism and Catastrophe Provision Procedural Change Effective October 1, 2005

New York Workers Compensation Statistical Plan Revisions

Minnesota Workers Compensation Assigned Risk Plan (MWCARP) Policyholders Affinity Insurance Services, Inc. (Affinity) Plan Administrator of the MWCARP

YOU VE GOT QUESTIONS? For All That Matters

DELAWARE COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU, INC. DELAWARE CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT PROGRAM (DCCPAP)

Overview of Tennessee s Workers Compensation Market Conditions and Environment

INDIVIDUAL RISK RATING Study Note, April 2017

Introduction NCCI RESEARCH BRIEF. July 2010

DCRB CIRCULAR NO. 915

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD Loss Cost Revision

January 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary of Actuarial Committee Recommendations

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD General Rate Revision

Financial Data Designated Statistical Reporting (DSR) Level Premium. Objective

Quarterly Call for First Quarter of Calendar Year 2013 (CA-QT-1Q13) Due Date: May 7, 2013

Mary Jean King, FCAS, FCA, MAAA Consulting Actuary 118 Warfield Road Cherry Hill, NJ P: F:

A GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING, COMMUNICATING, AND INFLUENCING ACTUARIAL RESULTS

Premium Calculations

Workers Compensation Claim Frequency Continues to Fall in 2006

DECEMBER 28, 2007 ANNOUNCEMENT MO Missouri Item 06 MO 2007 Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007

DELAWARE COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU, INC.

Unit Statistical Data Editing and Validation

Unit Editing and Data Validation Concepts. Objectives

Quarterly Call for Fourth Quarter of Calendar Year 2012 (CA-QT-4Q12) Due Date: February 14, 2013

4. Statement of Cash Flows

MEDICAL DATA CALL INTRODUCTION

DELAWARE COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU, INC.

Quarterly Call for Third Quarter of Calendar Year 2014 (CA-QT-3Q14) Due Date: October 31, 2014

Iowa. Law Only Rate Filing Voluntary and Assigned Risk Markets Proposed Effective July 1, 2017

Quarterly Call for Third Quarter of Calendar Year 2015 (CA-QT-3Q15) Due Date: October 29, 2015

Financial Calls Designated Statistical Reporting Level Premium

February 5, 2016 PCRB CIRCULAR NO. 1652

Proposed 2017 Rating Values and the 2017 Experience Modification Estimator

Original SSAP and Current Authoritative Guidance: SSAP No. 66

November 28, 2012 PCRB CIRCULAR NO Re: APPROVAL OF PCRB FILING NO. 248

November 29, 2011 VIA HAND DELIVERY

Workers Compensation Ratemaking An Overview

TOI: 16.0 Workers Compensation Sub-TOI: Standard WC January 1, 2011 Advisory Rate Filing

CIRCULAR BP CIRCULAR BP Businessowners Loss Cost Revision. September 1, 2014 BUSINESSOWNERS LOSS COST REVISION CHANGES:

Unit Reporting State Programs and Exceptions. Unique State Programs Agenda

EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1, 2008

Workers Compensation and the Aging Workforce

Unit Reporting State Programs and Exceptions

February 4, 2003 BUREAU CIRCULAR NO. 1457

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY. Original Printing Issued November 11, 2016 UPDATE PAGE 1

FEBRUARY 26, 2008 PLAN INFORMATION PLAN Plan Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

MINNESOTA CONTRACTORS PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT PROGRAM

Public Service Company of New Mexico Attachment H 1 Current Year Formula Rate

MASSACHUSETTS WORKERS COMPENSATION STATISTICAL PLAN

Unit Statistical Data State Programs and Exceptions

Antitrust Notice 31/05/2016. Evaluating a Commercial Umbrella Rating Plan Using ISO. Table of Contents / Agenda

Tennessee. Voluntary Loss Costs, Assigned Risk Rates, and Rating Values Filing Proposed Effective March 1, 2018

California Small Deductible Plan Effective January 1, 2019

Iowa. Voluntary and Assigned Risk Rates and Rating Values Filing Proposed Effective January 1, 2018

Introduction to Detailed Claim Information Reporting. Lesson 2: Data Elements

January 31, 2014 Page 1 of 12 PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE CALL FOR EXPERIENCE #9

Financial Calls Designated Statistical Reporting Level Premium

Rate Groups & Classifications

Workers Compensation Basics. Today s Focus. Coverage Comparisons. Coverage Comparisons 7/17/2015

Transcription:

Lesson 3 Experience Rating 1. Objective This lesson explains the purpose and process of experience rating and how it impacts the premium of workers compensation insurance. 2. Introduction to Experience Rating Experience Rating uses the employer s past experience (losses) to project future losses. It compares the losses of the employer to the average risk in a particular classification of business. (For more information regarding classifications, please see the Introduction to Classification lesson.) 3. Introduction to Experience Rating Why have Experience Rating? Because it: incorporates both debits and credits gives employers some influence on their final premium provides incentives for safety programs promotes occupational health and safety produces a net premium cost that is the best indicator of the employer s potential for incurring claims 4. Introduction to Experience Rating Insurance is: sharing the cost of a loss by members of a group, who are likely to experience the loss. We can predict the cost and probability of injuries for the whole group... But not which member of the group will actually be responsible for these costs.

5. Introduction to Experience Rating Developing the average rate: The insureds are grouped by their business operation or classification. Estimated losses of the group are added to calculate an average cost. 6. Introduction to Experience Rating The experience of the employer is usually derived from the latest available three years. The experience is then compared with the average of all employers in that classification. Equal to the average = UNITY (a Unity mod equals 1.00) Lower than average = CREDIT (a Credit mod is less than 1.00, such as 0.75) Higher than average = DEBIT (a Debit mod is greater than 1.00, such as 1.10) 7. How Does Experience Rating Work? Two Primary Advantages of Experience Rating, when compared to using only Manual Rating, are: It tailors the cost prediction and final net premium cost to the individual insured It provides added incentives for loss reduction

8. How Does Experience Rating Work? The more important fact to Experience Rating is that the accident did occur. Therefore, the Plan gives greater weight to accident frequency than to accident severity. Example of Frequency vs. Severity No. Of Claims Cost per Claim Total Cost Employer 1 1 $50,000 $50,000 Employer 2 10 $ 5,000 $50,000 Which company is safer? At which company would you have greater chance of having a claim? 9. How Does Experience Rating Work? Capping of Individual Claims One very large claim may be due to just bad luck. Therefore, each individual claim is capped by a state accident limitation. For most states, the state accident limitation is approximately $100,000. 10. How Does Experience Rating Work? Primary = The First $5,000 of each claim (Reflects claim frequency) Excess = any ratable individual loss greater than $5,000 (Reflects claim severity) Individual State Accident Limitation Ratable Individual Primary Excess $1,234,567 $100,000 $100,000 $5,000 $95,000

11. How Does Experience Rating Work? The Size of the Insured Matters. Why? The larger employer is statistically more likely to show its true colors than the smaller employer. 12. How Does Experience Rating Work? Experience ratings are not made by the insurance carriers. The experience ratings are computed by the appropriate advisory organization, such as the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. (NCCI) The employer qualifies for experience rating if the manual premium exceeds an eligibility point. (Eligibility criteria differ by state.) 13. How Does Experience Rating Work? The Experience Period is usually the three years ending one year prior to the modification effective date. EXAMPLE: If the modification is effective January 1, 2003, the experience rating uses injury experience under policies for: 1/1/1999-12/31/1999 1/1/2000-12/31/2000 1/1/2001-12/31/2001 14. How Does Experience Rating Work? Essentials of Experience Rating: It is mandatory for all insureds that meet the premium eligibility requirements. It is prepared according to a fixed formula. The formula is designed to measure how an employer s performance differs from the average of other employers in that classification.

15. How Does Experience Rating Work? Experience Rating is based on Two Statistical Laws: 1. The larger the base, the more reliable the actual record is. (As the size of the employer increases, the actual historical record is given more weight/ credibility.) 2. The cost of an injury varies over a very large range. (The cost is less predictable than the fact that an injury occurred.) 16. 1998 Experience Rating Plan Adjustment (ERA) Reduced the weight applied to medical-only losses Increased the weight applied to excess losses Implemented inflation-sensitive primary/ excess split of actual losses 17. 1998 Experience Rating Plan Adjustment (ERA) Reduced Impact of Medical-Only Claims: The determination of actual losses both primary and excess has changed. Under the ERA adjustment, 30% of actual primary and excess portions of individual medical-only claims will be included in the calculation of the modification factor. Medical-Only Claim of $7,000 Prior to Plan Adjustment: After Plan Adjustment: Primary = $5,000 Primary = $1,500 (30% x $5,000) Excess = $2,000 Excess = $600 (30% x $2,000)

18. 1998 Experience Rating Plan Adjustment (ERA) Adjustments to Improve Plan Performance: Increases reliance on the excess portion of the actual losses Includes factor for the impact of inflation 19. The URE Report An URE Report is reported by the insurer for each policy. This report includes the audited data from that policy. The data on these reports is used for preparing and calculating the experience rating. The following data is included from the URE Report (seen above): 1. Insured s Name 2. State 3. Policy Effective Date 4. Risk ID Number 5. Class Code 6. Exposure (Payroll) Amount 7. Rate 8. Premium Amount 9. Claim Number 10. Accident Date 11. Claim Amounts 12. Claim Status 20. Calculating The Experience Rating Once the data from each of the three policy years has been transferred to the worksheet (Items 1-3 & 5-13 on Exhibit B), the experience rating calculation begins. 1. The actual primary losses (Item 14) are calculated. (Column 10) 2. Total the actual losses (Item 15 & Box H) and actual primary losses (Item 16 & Box I), using ERA if applicable. 3. Actual excess losses (Item 17 & Box F) are calculated by subtracting the actual primary from the total of all actual losses. We have calculated how the employer fared. Now, it s time to compare this to the average losses of businesses in the same classification.

21. Calculating The Experience Rating To calculate the average losses, we turn our sights to the expected losses. 4. Calculate the Expected es (Item 19 & Column 5 on Exhibit C) for each class code and payroll amount [Expected es = Payroll/100 x ELR (Item 18)] 5. Calculate the Expected Primary es (Item 22 & Column 6) for each Expected Amount [Expected Primary es = Expected es x D-Ratio (Item 21)] 6. Total the Expected es (Item 20 & Box D) and Expected Primary es (Item 23 & Box E) 7. Calculate the Expected Excess es (Item 24 & Box C) 22. Calculating The Experience Rating We then need to include two other important factors in calculating the experience rating. 8. The Weighting Value (Item 27 & Box A) is the factor that determines how much of the excess losses are used in the experience rating. This factor changes based on the size of the employer. Remember that the larger employer is more credible in predicting their own future losses. 9. The Ballast Value (Item 29 & Box G) is a stabilizer that lessens the effect of any one claim on the experience rating. 23. Calculating The Experience Rating Now we can calculate the experience rating by comparing the actual information (how the employer fared) versus the expected information (the average). To make this comparison between actual and expected, we total the following amounts for each: 10. The primary losses (Items 25 & 26) 11. The stabilizing value [a calculated value that applies equally to actual and expected losses and is based on the ballast value] (Item 28) 12. The weighted excess losses [Excess X Weighting Value] (Items 30 & 31) Compare the actual totals (Item 32 & Box J) to the expected totals (Item 33 & Box K). Your result is the experience rating, expressed as a decimal (Item 34).