RTS 28 Reports Equities - Shares and Depositary Receipts. Table 1 - Top 5 Brokers for Professional Clients

Similar documents
Equities Shares & Depositary Receipts

Russell Investments Implementation Services, LLC (832R0263EHR5038Q2Z24) 100% 100% 0%

MIFID II: RTS 28 REPORT INFORMATION ON EXECUTION VENUES AND QUALITY OF EXECUTION HPC SA

MiFID II Top 5 Venue Reporting Table. Date: 30 th April Prepared by: Integra Private Wealth Limited

MiFID II Top 5 Venue Reporting Report

RTS 28 - BEST EXECUTION MONITORING SUMMARY ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD 2018 Contracts for Difference

Millennium Global Investment Limited RTS 28 Disclosure Report. Disclosure Period: 01/01/2017 to 31/12/2017

Saxo Capital Markets UK Limited

Execution Quality Report

Annual Reporting on the Quality of Execution Obtained

2018 RTS28 Report - Summary of the analysis BNP Paribas SA Swaps and Other Equity Derivatives

Sparinvest S.A. RTS 28 report

Best Execution Policy. Crossbridge Capital LLP

Quality of Execution 2017 Annual Report

Parvus Asset Management Europe Limited

Best Execution Disclosure Reporting Period: 1 st January 31 st December 2017

Effective Date April 30 th Explanatory note re Quality of Execution of Client Orders

Annual publication on the identity of execution venues and on the quality of execution required by Directive 2014/65/EU

A.1 INFORMATION ON THE TOP FIVE EXECUTION VENUES

BGC Brokers L.P. RTS 28 Quality of Execution

Best Execution. Andre Nogueira

Eurobank Cyprus Ltd MIFID II Annual Report on the Quality of Deal Execution for 2017

2018 RTS28 Report - Summary of the analysis BNP PARIBAS S.A. COMMODITY DERIVATIVES

Quality of Execution Annual Report

Equities - Shares & Depositary Receipts

Measuring your approach MiFID II Paper: Best execution

REPORT OLD MUTUAL GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) LIMITED QUALITATIVE EXECUTION

2018 RTS28 Report - Summary of the analysis BNP PARIBAS S.A. Securities Financing Transactions

Classes of Financial Instrument traded during the period

Percentage of passive orders

D. E. Shaw & Co. (London), LLP Annual Summary of Execution Arrangements

RTS 28 Article 3(3), Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis

2018 RTS28 Report - Summary of the analysis BNP Paribas Arbitrage SNC Warrants and Certificate Derivatives

Best Execution Policy Information for Eligible Counterparties, Professional clients and Retail clients

Order Execution Policy. January 2018 v1

Best Execution Policy

2018 RTS28 Report - Summary of the analysis BNP PARIBAS S.A. RATES

Liquidnet Europe Limited (LNEL) Best Execution Disclosure 2017 Equity and Equity-Like Instruments

Execution Policy. 1 Purpose. to and taking into account the execution factors (see paragraph 4).

Best Execution RTS 28 (Top 5 venues and quality of Execution) Best Efforts report

Order Execution Policy Cantor Fitzgerald Europe ( CFE ) For Professional Clients

BestExHub RTS 28 & DA 65(6) OVERVIEW

For the Period: 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017 inclusive ( 2017 Calendar Year ) Publication date: 30 April 2018

TMS BROKERS EUROPE BEST EXECUTION POLICY

Canada Life Investments

IS Prime Limited BEST EXECUTION REPORT FOR 2017 APRIL 2018

Apr Napier Park Global Capital Ltd Annual Best Execution Disclosure 2017

2017 MiFID II EXECUTION QUALITY REPORT

State Street Bank Luxembourg S.C.A. Order Execution Policy

RTS28 - Execution quality reports

Santander Investment Bolsa, S.V., S.A.U. Execution Quality Report under RTS28 Reception & Transmission of Orders

NORTHERN TRUST SECURITIES LLP

Annual Trade Execution Report April 2018

GMSA Investments Limited. RTS 28 Disclosure Report Calendar Year Disclosure Period: 1 January to 31 December 2017

Jefferies International Limited

Order Execution Policy 3 rd January 2018

Order Execution Policy Macquarie Investment Management EMEA

Och-Ziff Management Europe Limited Annual RTS 28 Best Execution Disclosures Oz Management

BlueBay Order Execution Policy

ISAM Funds (UK) Limited

Taconic Capital Advisors UK LLP ( TCA UK ) Best Execution Report

INFORMATION ON THE ORDER EXECUTION POLICY OF PATRIA FINANCE FOR PROFESSIONAL CLIENTS

Best Execution Policy

January ABN AMRO Global Markets Order Execution Policy Professional Clients

BlueBay Asset Management LLP RTS 28 Qualitative Assessment of Execution (year ending 31 st December 2017)

BCWM Best Execution Policy

Order Execution Policy

SKANESTAS INVESTMENTS LIMITED BEST EXECUTION AND ORDER HANDLING POLICY

Information. MiFID II Best Execution Top 5 Execution Venues and Top 5 Brokers

Bank of China Limited, Luxembourg Branch Bank of China (Luxembourg) S.A. 37/39, Boulevard Prince Henri L-1724 Luxembourg

Information on the RBCCM Europe Best Execution Policy

Order Execution Policy

Information on top five execution brokers and quality of execution as per 2014/65/EU and RTS n. 28 of (reference period 2017)

Jefferies International Limited

First State Investments Annual Order Execution Report Year Ending April 2018

Order Execution Policy MiFID Firms

Order Execution Policy Purpose and Scope

Order Execution Policy Disclosure. Effective as at 3 January 2018.

Liquidnet Order Execution Policy

Proportion of orders executed as a percentage of total in that class

Canaccord Genuity Limited Order Execution Policy

ORDER TRANSMISSION AND EXECUTION POLICY

Top 5 Execution Venues/Brokers & Annual Qualitative Report

(f) Structured Finance Instruments

Order Execution Policy for Retail Clients Settling Through Pilling Cantor Fitzgerald Europe ( CFE )

William Blair: Client Order Execution Policy

Top 5 Execution Venue Report. Execution data on our top five execution venues for each class of financial instrument

Execution Quality Summary Statement of 2017

Best Execution Policy

Order Execution Policy

Order Execution Policy

CLIENT ORDER EXECUTION POLICY

2017 Annual Best Execution Report This report was published pursuant to Article 65(6) of the MiFID II Delegated Org Regulation

MEDIOBANCA MANAGEMENT COMPANY S.A. BEST EXECUTION POLICY

Order Execution Policy

ORDER EXECUTION POLICY. ABG Sundal Collier Group

Order Execution Policy Disclosure

Nordea Execution Policy

Order Execution Policy January 2018

MiFID II: What is new for buy side? Best Execution Topic 3

Transcription:

RTS 28 Reports 2017 This report has been prepared by for the period from 1 st January 2017 to 31 December 2017 for the purposes of meeting s regulatory obligations under Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/576 ( MiFID II ) which requires Cantor Fitzgerald Europe to annually publish: (i) the top five venues where it executed clients ; and (ii) the top five firms to whom it transmitted or placed client for execution, in respect of each of financial instruments noted below. This report also provides information on s assessment of the quality of execution it obtained from these execution venues and firms (based on its internal monitoring), for each of financial instruments. 1. Equities - Shares & Depositary Receipts Table 1 - Top 5 Brokers for Professional Clients Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (5493004J7H4GCPG6OB62) (4PQUH3JPFGFF3BB653) (W22LROWP2IHZBB6K528) Cantor Fitzgerald Canada Corporation (5493003QORT3UQVDQB37) executed passive directed 33.3405% 38.6255% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 15.0537% 25.8302% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 15.0071% 18.5989% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 3.2130% 3.4756% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 2.9226% 6.5192% ot applicable ot applicable 0% Table 2 - Top 5 Brokers for Retail Clients Knight Capital Europe Limited (549300346EFUPFCXJT79) (4PQUH3JPFGFF3BB653) UBS Limited (REYPIEJ7XZHSUI0355) (W22LROWP2IHZBB6K528) executed passive directed 0.0040% 0.0034% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 0.0022% 0.0071% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 0.0005% 0.0014% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 0.0005% 0.0006% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 0.00003% 0.0001% ot applicable ot applicable 0%

Table 3 - Top 5 Venues for Professional Clients (XLO) - AIM MTF (AIMX) - MTF (XLOM) executed passive directed 12.3926% 0.2606% ot available ot available 0% 11.4254% 0.3515% ot available ot available 0% 0.2164% 0.0041% ot available ot available 0% 0.0741% 0.0006% ot available ot available 0% Table 4 - Top 5 Venues for Retail Clients (XLO) - AIM MTF (AIMX) executed Y passive directed 0.1181% 0.0036% ot available ot available 0% 0.0217% 0.0019% ot available ot available 0% 0.0007% 0.0003% ot available ot available 0%

2. Exchange traded products (Exchange traded funds, exchange traded notes and exchange traded commodities) Table 1 - Top 5 Brokers for Professional Clients Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (5493004J7H4GCPG6OB62) (W22LROWP2IHZBB6K528) (4PQUH3JPFGFF3BB653) Knight Capital Europe Limited (549300346EFUPFCXJT79) Exchange Traded Products (Exchange Traded Funds Exchange Traded otes and Exchange Traded Commodities) executed passive directed 34.4972% 75.8484% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 6.3150% 16.2408% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 3.9404% 2.2838% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 1.3325% 1.7122% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 0.3222% 1.7823% ot applicable ot applicable 0% Table 2 - Top 5 Brokers for Retails Clients Knight Capital Europe Limited (549300346EFUPFCXJT79) Exchange Traded Products (Exchange Traded Funds Exchange Traded otes and Exchange Traded Commodities) executed Y passive directed 0.0040% 0.0111% ot applicable ot applicable 0% Table 3 - Top 5 Venues for Professional Clients Exchange Traded Products (Exchange Traded Funds Exchange Traded otes and Exchange Traded Commodities) (XLO) Bloomberg Trading Facility Limited (BMTF) executed passive directed 20.6880% 0.8235% ot available ot available 0% 7.9114% 0.4745% ot available ot available 0% 4.7663% 0.0184% ot available ot available 0%

3. Securitized Derivatives Table 1 - Top 5 Brokers for Professional Clients Top five execution venues ranked in terms of (W22LROWP2IHZBB6K528) Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (5493004J7H4GCPG6OB62) (4PQUH3JPFGFF3BB653) Cantor Fitzgerald Canada Corporation (5493003QORT3UQVDQB37) Securitized Derivatives: Warrants and Certificate Derivatives executed passive directed 7.4560% 28.0702% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 3.1497% 14.3860% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 1.5482% 7.0175% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 0.8960% 1.4035% ot applicable ot applicable 0% 0.5324% 16.4912% ot applicable ot applicable 0% Table 2 - Top 5 Venues for Professional Clients Top five execution venues ranked in terms of (XLO) Securitized Derivatives: Warrants and Certificate Derivatives executed passive directed 62.9510% 18.2456% ot available ot available 0% 22.9116% 9.1228% ot available ot available 0% 4. Equity Derivatives Table 1 - Top 5 Venues for Professional Clients EUREX (XEUR) EUROEXT PARIS (XMO) ICE FUTURES EUROPE (IFLO) EUROEXT AMSTERDAM (XEUE) (XLOD) Equity Derivatives: Options and Futures admitted to trading on a trading venue executed as percentage passive directed 84.7887% 72.4675% ot available ot available 100% 6.5659% 8.9610% ot available ot available 100% 3.5149% 6.6234% ot available ot available 100% 2.3146% 6.2338% ot available ot available 100% 0.9572% 0.3896% ot available ot available 100%

5. Contracts for difference Table 1 - Top 5 Venues for Professional Clients executed as percentage Contracts for difference passive directed 100% 100% ot available ot available 100% 6. Debt Instruments Table 1 - Top 5 Venues for Professional Clients executed as percentage Debt Instruments - Bonds passive directed 100% 100% ot available ot available 0% Assumptions: Top 5 Brokers reflect the that were transmitted to another investment firm for execution. Top 5 Venues reflect the executed directly on the market using membership. 'Total in that ' means the total notional value traded by the firm per asset for retail and professional clients. Passive/ indicators are not relevant when the are transmitted to another broker for execution. All reported 'value' information is based on notional amount. is the execution venue where trades are executed off exchange.

RTS 28 Qualitative Wording 30 th April 2018 Investment firms shall publish for each of financial instruments, a summary of the analysis and conclusions they draw from their detailed monitoring of the quality of execution obtained on the execution venues where they executed all client in the previous year. ( CFE ) conducts trading business in a wide range of asset es (see below). CFE has the capability to execute trades directly on the and on the other exchanges of which it is a member. It also routes for execution to selected brokers. Equities, Global Depositary Receipts, Exchange Traded Funds and other equity like instruments The Equities front office management reviews Transaction Cost Analysis ( TCA ) information on the brokers to which CFE has passed for execution. Equity Derivatives For exchange traded equity derivatives most trades are executed on exchange and not passed to brokers for execution. The client determines on which venue the order is to be executed. Fixed Income 3 For Fixed Income client order executions, CFE is the sole execution venue and DCM Management reviews the quality of execution on an ongoing basis for this asset. Contracts for Difference For contracts for difference, CFE is the manufacturer of the contract and therefore the firm is the sole execution venue. The CFD is a bespoke product for the client. Foreign Exchange Best execution does not apply as client were not received for FX products in 2017. Compliance monitoring In addition to front office best execution monitoring, the CFE Compliance team conducts periodic best execution monitoring. Please refer to the CFE Best Execution Policy for further detail. Based on its assessment of the design and application of the various measures described above, CFE concludes that it has met its best execution obligations in relation to the quality of execution as set out in the FCA Rules for the period of this report. The information shall include: an explanation of the relative importance the firm gave to the execution factors of price, costs, speed, likelihood of execution or any other consideration including qualitative factors when assessing the quality of execution; a The Best Execution Policy sets out for each asset subject to disclosure in accordance with RTS 28 the relative importance of the execution factors including qualitative factors. The policy is available via the following website address: http://www.cantor.com/global/europe/ b a description of any close links, conflicts of interests, and common ownerships with respect to any execution venues used to execute ; With regards to ADRs, Bonds, Equities, ETFs and Warrants, CFE leverages the execution capabilities of affiliates within the Cantor Fitzgerald group including our parent company, Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. Cantor group offices are located across orth America, Europe, Asia Pacific and the Middle East.

a description of any specific arrangements with any execution venues regarding payments made or received, discounts, rebates or non-monetary benefits received; c CFE is able to use ( GSI ) for equities as a custodian and clearer. CFE will elect to use GSI to execute client where we believe this will result in the best outcome for our client. In these cases the client incurs no additional cost. In certain Third Country markets which it does not access directly CFE uses local brokers to execute client. The criteria for selection of these brokers include their experience of the market concerned and their order execution capabilities. Clients are informed of the amount of their commission that is paid over to the local broker for the execution service. an explanation of the factors that led to a change in the list of execution venues listed in the firm s execution policy, if such a change occurred; d e f CFE s Best Execution Policy sets out the execution venues and brokers on which significant reliance is placed to achieve best execution of its client s. The data set out in the tables above is consistent with the information included in the Best Execution Policy, save for the full legal name of brokers not always appearing in the policy. otwithstanding this, our view is that our Best Execution Policy provides clients with materially reliable information about execution venues and brokers and therefore allows them to make a reasonable decision as to whether to use CFE s execution services. an explanation of how order execution differs according to client categorisation, where the firm treats categories of clients differently and where it may affect the order execution arrangements; CFE seeks to achieve best execution irrespective of client categorisation and does not differentiate between client categories when executing an order. otwithstanding this, for retail clients best execution is determined in relation to total consideration rather than price, which is the regulatory benchmark for professional clients. an explanation of whether other criteria were given precedence over immediate price and cost when executing retail client and how these other criteria were instrumental in delivering the best possible result in terms of the total consideration to the client; The main consideration in executing a retail client s order is total consideration. However, other factors may determine the context in which this objective is achieved e.g. in illiquid markets, likelihood of execution and speed of execution may be relevant. an explanation of how the investment firm has used any data or tools relating to the quality of execution, including any data published under Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/575. CFE has made use of a variety of data and tools in order to assess the quality of execution provided to its clients. The tools and data used include: Fidessa, Bloomberg, TCA and market data. g These data and tools have been used to assess the quality of client order handling and execution quality in real time as well as post-trade. This includes, but is not limited to, the conduct of sales persons, adherence to order instructions, the management and timeliness of order passing and execution, and reviewing relevant available quotes and market prices. Information to be made available in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/575 is not available for 2017. h where applicable, an explanation of how the investment firm has used output of a consolidated tape provider established under Article 65 of Directive 2014/65/EU. o consolidated tape was established under Article 65 of Directive 2014/65/EU during 2017.