This page left intentionally blank

Similar documents
This page is intentionally left blank.

Priority: R-08 Crisis Services System Enhancements FY Change Request. Cost and FTE

This page is intentionally left blank.

CDHS Adult Financial Programs Overview

Proposed Solution The Department of Human Services requests $150,910 total funds, including $98,442 General Fund

Adult Financial Reference Guide

Key State TANF Policies Affecting Microenterprise: Colorado

Department of Corrections

JBC staffer, Eric Kurtz, provided an overview of the HCPF budget, noting a few key points and tables/charts:

MAPP The Medicaid Purchase Plan. MAPP - Background. MAPP Background

Changes in TANF Work Requirements Could Make Them More Effective in Promoting Employment

Federal Employees: Pay and Pension Increases Since 1969

Health Shocks and Disability Transitions among Near-Elderly Workers. Discussant Remarks By David Weaver Social Security Administration

Federal Reauthorization of Welfare Reform

Texas ABLE Program Disclosure Statement and Participation Agreement. As of April 26, 2018

Key State TANF Policies Affecting Microenterprise. California

Perspective on Colorado s Budget and Economy

Federal Employees: Pension COLAs and Pay Adjustments Since 1969

Governor s Proposed FY Budget: Impact on Alameda County Seniors and Services

How The Chained Consumer Price Index Would Affect Social Security Benefits

Social Security and VA COLA Cuts Will Have a Big Effect on Veterans and Their Families

Office of the Attorney General Supplemental Budget Request

Introduction.

Federal Employees: Pay and Pension Increases Since 1969

59 million people receive Social Security each month, in one of three categories: Nearly 1 in 5 Americans gets Social Security benefits.

Health Care Reform and DRA 2005 Implementation Update

SSI Transfer of Asset Penalty

COMPARISON OF 529 ABLE ACCOUNTS, SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS AND POOLED SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS

Appendices Senior Law Day Sponsors

MEDI CAR E ISS UE B R I E F

Community MassHealth for Elders

Federal Employees: Pension COLAs and Pay Adjustments Since 1969

Federal Employees: Pay and Pension Increases Since 1969

Community MassHealth for Elders

HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT

THE IMPACT OF INFLATION ON SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS

MDHS HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS MANUAL ML 42 JANUARY 2005 PICKLE DISREGARD MinnesotaCare: No provisions. MA: METHOD A: No provisions.

APPENDIX B RSDI/SSI INCREASES 2015

Governor s May Revise FY Budget Proposal: Impact on Alameda County Seniors and Services

MEDI CAR E ISS UE B R I E F

Social Security Reform and Benefit Adequacy

Summary Generally, the goal of disability insurance is to replace a portion of a worker s income should illness or disability prevent him or her from

Presentation on New Student Centered Funding Formula Proposal and FY Riverside Community College District Budget Planning

Affordable Care Act Repeal and Replacement Legislation

SSI Resource Issues: Common Problems and Solutions

By Mark Greenberg January 30, The TANF Participation Rate Structure under the Budget Reconciliation Bill: A Summary of the Rules

MID-YEAR FISCAL REVIEW - FISCAL YEAR

SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS IN OREGON West Coast Trust Meeting June 9, 2006 Penny L. Davis, The Elder Law Firm Portland, Oregon

Ending the Stigma that Affects Senior Benefits Enrollment: Closing the CalFresh Participation Gap

uninsured Medicaid Today; Preparing for Tomorrow A Look at State Medicaid Program Spending, Enrollment and Policy Trends

After years of budget cuts, Glendale Union High School District is being forced to do more with less.

16.6 CATEGORICALLY NEEDY, MANDATORY - FOR AGED, BLIND OR DISABLED. NOTE: No Categorically Needy coverage group is subject to a spenddown provision.

16.6 CATEGORICALLY NEEDY, MANDATORY - FOR AGED, BLIND OR DISABLED. NOTE: No Categorically Needy coverage group is subject to a spenddown provision.

INSERT BLACK & WHITE PICTURE

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Work

Medicaid: A Lower-Cost Approach to Serving a High-Cost Population

Assets of Low Income Households by SNAP Eligibility and Participation in Final Report. October 19, Carole Trippe Bruce Schechter

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

Health Care Access Law: Frequently Asked Questions. The Individual Mandate

TANF at 20. Susan Golonka, Acting Director Office of Family Assistance. National Governor s Association Kansas City, MO June 28, 2016

Report on JMOC Limit for the Medicaid Program for the FY Budget. December 2018

ent Law Project Benefits Wage to March 2013 Introduction The Economic significantly previously expand

The Demographics of Missouri Medicaid: Implications for Work Requirements

ALASKA ADULT PUBLIC ASSISTANCE MANUAL CHAPTER CONTENTS

Supplemental Security Income (SSI)

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Although several factors determine whether and how women use health

APPENDIX A TRANSFER OF RESOURCE POLICIES A. TRANSERS BY THE MEDICAID BENEFIT GROUP MADE ON OR BEFORE 6/30/88

Elders Living on the Edge

GLOSSARY OF TERMS. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This is a U.S. Department that oversees Medicare and Medicaid. Previous name HCFA

Medicaid and HealthWave Standards Rev

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (P.L )

Kansas City Regional Health Assessment

Implications for Personal Finance

medicaid a n d t h e Aging Out of Medicaid: What Is the Risk of Becoming Uninsured?

Republican Senators Unveil New ACA Repeal and Replace Legislation

The primer is updated to reflect estimates from the 2016 Social Security Trustees Report.

Estimate of a Work and Save Plan in Georgia

Demographic and Economic Trends in Rural America

Supplemental Security Income (SSI)

Pooled Special Needs Trust Planning What Families Need to Know

Executive summary WORLD EMPLOYMENT SOCIAL OUTLOOK

Examining the Rural-Urban Income Gap. The Center for. Rural Pennsylvania. A Legislative Agency of the Pennsylvania General Assembly

FY Maintenance of Effort Budget

Implications of Work and Earnings on SSI

Planning for Special Needs and Ohio s STABLE Account. Presented by Logan Philipps, Esq.

This is an SSI-related Group 1 MA category. 1. Is age 18 or older; and. 2. Received SSI; and

- He is not entitled to Medicare, Part A. Income: SSI Payment Level Assets: $2,000

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING - FY BUDGET REQUEST. Page G.12-1

WikiLeaks Document Release

Second Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP HOUSE SPONSORSHIP

Proposed Budget: Impact on California s Older Adults and People with Disabilities

Health Insurance Coverage in 2013: Gains in Public Coverage Continue to Offset Loss of Private Insurance

Age 18 Benefits Check-Up for Youth Transition Demonstration Participants:

Financial Report. Prepared for presentation to the Board of Trustees. March 15, 2018

Medicaid Eligibility For Nursing Home and Other Long-Term Care

Medicaid In Maine MaineCare. Maine Equal Justice Partners, 126 Sewall Street, Augusta, ME (207) :

The Demographics of Missouri Medicaid: Implications for Work Requirements

American Action Forum s Younger Adult National Survey Key Findings Memo Page 1

Multi-Year Financial Analysis FY2015 FY2019. November 2013

Transcription:

Page R-12-1

This page left intentionally blank Page R-12-2

Cost and FTE Priority: R-12 Old Age Pension Program Cost of Living Adjustment FY 2018-19 Change Request The Department requests $1,908,641 total funds/old Age Pension (OAP) cash funds in FY 2018-19 and $1,987,999 total funds/oap cash funds in FY 2019-20 and on-going in order to fund an anticipated 1.5% Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) to the grant award provided to OAP program participants. This is an increase of 2.0% over the FY 2017-18 appropriation. Current Program The OAP Program is established in the State constitution and is continuously appropriated. The OAP program provides basic cash assistance to low-income adults, age 60 or older, who meet OAP program eligibility requirements. Each year, the Social Security Administration (SSA) reviews the Consumer Price Index (CPI) to determine whether to increase benefits to Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients, through a COLA increase in order to keep pace with inflation. OAP program participants typically receive a COLA increase that matches the COLA passed for SSI recipients. The State Board of Human Services (SBHS) has constitutional authority to adjust the OAP grant standard effective on January 1 annually. Problem or Opportunity In October 2017, the SSA will announce a Supplemental Security Income COLA. The new COLA amount is subject to the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirement that requires a minimum State expenditure level of $27,575,059 on SSI recipients annually. Not passing along the COLA would result in the OAP grant standard not keeping pace with inflation and creating a negative fiscal impact on a vulnerable population. Consequences of Problem If the approved COLA is not passed along to OAP recipients, it will reduce the total amount of state expenditures applied towards SSI recipients as required by the SSA to meet the MOE spending requirement. Non-compliance with the MOE requirement could result in a loss of a quarter of the State s annual federal Medicaid funds or $325 million quarterly. Proposed Solution The Department requests $1,908,641 total funds/oap cash funds to pass along a 1.5% COLA to OAP eligible recipients, pending approval by the SBHS. The FY 2018-19 COLA monthly increase will be $12, setting the grant standard to $785 per month. This supports the Department s strategic policy initiative of helping individuals thrive in their own community. Page R-12-3

This page is intentionally left blank. Page R-12-4

Department of Human Services FY 2018-19 Funding Request November 1, 2017 John W. Hickenlooper Governor Reggie Bicha Executive Director Department Priority: R-12 Request Detail: Old Age Pension Program Cost of Living Adjustment Summary of Incremental Funding Change for FY 2018-19 Old Age Pension Program Cost of Living Adjustment Summary of Incremental Funding Change for FY 2019-20 Old Age Pension Program Cost of Living Adjustment Total Funds FTE Cash Funds $1,908,641 0.0 $1,908,641 Total Funds FTE Cash Fund $1,987,999 0.0 $1,987,999 Problem or Opportunity: The Department of Human Services request $1,908,641 in total funds/oap cash funds spending authority in FY 2018-19 to provide a 1.5% Cost of Living Adjustment for the Old Age Pension Program (OAP). According to the State Demographer, the official poverty rate for seniors in Colorado is about 1% higher than that of the general population. The Supplemental Poverty Rate indicates a wider gap, whereby seniors are almost twice as likely to be poorer than the average Colorado resident. This disparity is mostly attributed to medical costs that are not considered in the official poverty measure, yet are accounted for in the supplemental measure. The number of seniors in Colorado is growing faster than the overall State population. As such, the Old Age Pension program is designed to mitigate the effects of poverty among vulnerable Coloradans, over age 60, via cash benefits. Currently, the maximum OAP grant is $773. For many seniors, OAP funds are their primary source of disposable income to meet daily needs. The effects of inflation and other changes in the cost of living are magnified among these vulnerable seniors living on a limited, fixed income. In order to reduce this effect, the Social Security Administration (SSA) reviews the Consumer Price Index annually to determine whether to increase benefits to Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients in Page R-12-5

order to keep pace with inflation rates through a Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA). The SSA announces its COLA decision and corresponding amount in late October to be effective on January 1st of the following calendar year. Given the similarity in the SSI and OAP populations, Colorado typically mirrors the COLA, increasing the grant standard and monthly payments among OAP recipients. If a COLA is approved by the SSA, the State Board of Human Services (SBHS) has the constitutional authority to choose to raise (or not raise) the Old Age Pension (OAP) grant standard in accordance with the SSA s action. The SBHS has the sole discretion to set the grant standard for the OAP program based on analysis of the impact and recommendation for action from the Department. As such, the SBHS could change the grant standard at any time, regardless of whether or not the SSA has approved a COLA. However, when SSA does approve a COLA, the importance of mirroring the action via benefit increases to OAP program participants is magnified by its impact to the State s Maintenance of Effort (MOE) obligation whereby the State is required to meet a specific minimum expenditure level $27,419,920 each calendar year on Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients as a condition of receiving its full amount of Federal Financial Participation (FFP) for Medicaid. The penalty for non-compliance is equal to at least $325 million quarterly and at least $1.3 billion annually. Colorado failed to meet its MOE obligation in nine out of the last ten years. In years when the SSA COLA was not passed along to OAP recipients, this has contributed to the Department not meeting the State s MOE expenditure benchmark. In FY 2016-17, the Joint Budget Committee approved a COLA increase of 0.3% of the grant standard payment, consistent with the SSA s increase, increasing the monthly payment by $2 and setting the grant standard at $773. As anticipated in the July 2017 SSA Trustees report, the SSA is expected to announce a COLA of as high as 2.2% in October 2017 to be effective on January 1, 2018. As a more conservative estimate, given the previous low COLAs, this proposal calculates the impact of an OAP COLA of 1.5% in FY 2018-19 and beyond. This increase to OAP goes directly to participants as cash benefits to assist vulnerable seniors with daily living expenses. As such, this request supports two of the Department s strategic goals: Improving the lives of Colorado families in need by helping them to achieve economic security and Helping individuals to thrive in their community. Proposed Solution: The Department of Human Services requests $1,908,641 total funds/oap cash funds in FY 2018-19 and beyond to pass the anticipated COLA along to OAP recipients, pending approval of the COLA by the SSA and subsequent approval by the SBHS. The COLA will result in a 1.5% monthly increase ($12 per month) to vulnerable seniors. This request will be amended if the actual COLA amount is higher or lower than anticipated. This request does not require any increase in FTE. Page R-12-6

Anticipated Outcomes: By passing along a COLA to OAP recipients, the OAP grant will remain aligned with inflation and will help provide vulnerable elderly Coloradans with needed resources to meet their daily needs. If approved by the SBHS, this increase will be effective January 1, 2018; it would result in a maximum grant of $785 which is approximately 80% of the 2016 federal poverty level. If funds are not made available and/or the SBHS chooses not to pass along the COLA to OAP recipients, there could be negative repercussions to vulnerable seniors, most prominently failing to reduce hardship among one of the state s most vulnerable populations. By preserving recipients purchasing power, the Department will ensure seniors are no worse off. Furthermore, not making funds available to pass a COLA to OAP participants would create negative implications to the State s MOE obligation. Failing to pass along the COLA would effectively reduce the amount of countable state expenditures to meet the MOE. The penalty for not meeting MOE obligations is at least one quarter ($325 million) of the State s federal annual Medicaid funding. Assumptions and Calculations: The following calculations in Table 1 are based on the assumption that the SSA will announce a COLA of 1.5% in October 2017. The table below makes the following assumptions: 1) the SBHS will approve the COLA for OAP recipients for the same percentage as SSA, and 2) SBHS approval will be effective January 1, 2018 and the full annual increase would be in FY 2018-19. The OAP grant standard will be increased by $12. The COLA for SSI recipients (45% of the caseload) will be funded by SSI benefit. The COLA for OAP only recipients (55% of caseload) will be funded by this request. Table 1: Old Age Pension Projection Calculation FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Source A. OAP Monthly Caseload 24,099 25,101 COGNOS B. Grant Standard (Monthly) $773 $773 COGNOS C. Cost of Living Adjustment (1.5%) Monthly Increase $12 $12 Row B * 0.015 D. OAP Annual COLA $3,470,256 $3,614,544 Row C*12*A E. Caseload OAP Only (COLA not paid by SSA) 55% 55% COGNOS F. Fiscal Year Cost $1,908,641 $1,987,999 Row D*0.45 Page R-12-7

Table 2 illustrates the Long Bill appropriation and requested funding for FY 2018-19 and beyond Table 2: Long Bill Appropriation and Requested Funding for FY 2018-19 Through FY 2020-21 Line Item: (10) Adult Assistance Programs (B) Old Age Pension Program Total Funds General Fund Cash Funds FY 2017-18 Appropriation (SB 17-254) $95,329,664 $0 $95,329,664 Requested Funding (or Spending Authority) $1,908,641 $0 $1,908,641 FY 2018-19 Total Requested Appropriation $97,238,305 $0 $97,238,305 FY 2019-20 Annualization of Prior Year Funding $79,358 $0 $79,358 FY 2019-2020 Total Requested Appropriation $97,317,663 $0 $97,317,663 FY 2020-2021 Total Requested Appropriation $97,317,663 $0 $97,317,663 Page R-12-8