Business Plan FY

Similar documents
Northern Branch Jail Project

Section III BUDGET PREPARATION

Board Budgeting Basics

TOWN OF CARY BUDGET POLICIES UNDER THE NORTH CAROLINA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUDGET AND FISCAL CONTROL ACT

Legislative/Administrative

HOW ARE YOUR TAX DOLLARS BEING USED

PUBLIC DEFENDER SOURCE OF FUNDS USE OF FUNDS STAFFING TREND. Budget & Positions (FTEs) Operating Capital Positions $ 10,290,180 -

Organizational Chart Executive Assistant

GENERAL FUND TAX SUPPORT 100% 100% 100%

2. Does the document discuss how the short-term factors guided the development of the annual budget?

VI BUDGETARY FEDERAL GRANTS AND COST ALLOCATION TEAM LEADER JOB POSTING FY

February 2011 Report No An Audit Report on Correctional Managed Health Care at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

GFOA AWARD FOR BEST PRACTICES IN SCHOOL BUDGETING. Applicant and Judge's Guide

AUDITOR-CONTROLLER SOURCE OF FUNDS USE OF FUNDS STAFFING TREND. Budget & Positions (FTEs) Operating $ Capital Positions 5,422,872 10,

COOK COUNTY FY2014 EXECUTIVE BUDGET RECOMMENDATION: Analysis and Recommendations

GFOA Best Practices and Budget Awards Program (Community Colleges) April 8, Spring ICCCFO Conference

BAY COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM LIBRARY DIRECTOR EVALUATION POLICY

PUBLIC DEFENDER SOURCE OF FUNDS USE OF FUNDS STAFFING TREND. Budget & Positions (FTEs) Operating Capital Positions $ 9,272,526

STANDARD PROCEDURES Budgeting Page 1

2017 Strategic Financial Plan Executive Summary

Strategic Plan of Work & Projections. Development of the Plan of Work

FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT

APPROVED OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 AND FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR

DUPAGE COUNTY PROPOSED FY2012 FINANCIAL PLAN: Analysis and Recommendations

MISSION SUMMARY OF SERVICES/FACILITIES TRENDS AND ISSUES

Five-Year Financial Forecast FY

Balanced Scorecard. A Strategic Focus

Duval County Public Schools

Budget Summary. Five Year Plan. Process. Budget Summary

ENERGY MANAGEMENT PLAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT POLICY: ERG-1

Coronado Unified School District

OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

DODEA ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION DODEA COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SYSTEM

2013 Budget and Plan Guidelines

Office of the City Auditor. Committed to increasing government efficiency, effectiveness, accountability and transparency.

School Finance 101 for New Superintendents

Travis County Commissioners Court Voting Session Agenda Request

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction.. 1. The Budget Calendar 2. Information Required 2. General Indicators of a Jurisdiction s Financial Condition 3

Legislative/Administrative

UNDERSTANDING THE BUDGET

Office of the Provost University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 3 February 2016

FY15 REVENUES. FY 14 Adopted Taxes. General Fund $ $ $753.50

Budget Analyst GS Career Path Guide

Quality of Internal Control Certification. Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation

STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of the State Auditor

Corridors of Commerce DRAFT Scoring and Prioritization Process. Patrick Weidemann Director of Capital Planning and Programming November 1, 2017

Section F. Annual Budgetary Processes, Policies, & Fund Structure

Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Section F. Annual Budgetary Processes, Policies, & Fund Structure

Cumberland County. Strategic Results

FY16 REVENUES. FY 15 Adopted Taxes. General Fund $ $ $ Voter Approved Debt Service $37.30 $36.90 $37.50

County Executive Office

WAKE COUNTY Recommended BUDGET FY july 1, 2016 June 30, 2017

Outcome-Based Budgeting Process

Oregon Legislative Fiscal Office Fiscal Impact Statement Process and Best Practices

Municipal Budgeting. Certified Government Finance Officer Review Session February 2017

UNDERSTANDING THE BUDGET

INTERNAL CONTROL IMPACT OF STAFF REDUCTIONS

UNTHSC. Annual Budget Development Process Fiscal Year 2019 Guidelines & Instructions - Spring 2018

Management Compensation Framework

Board of Equalization

ZERO-BASED BUDGET MANUAL FISCAL YEAR 2017

NLPES Excellence in Evaluation Award Submission New Mexico Legislative Finance Committee Program Evaluation Unit Narrative

Budget Process 101 NACSLB. February 8, 2017

The City Colleges of Chicago Debt Management Policy

BUSINESS SERVICES MISSION STATEMENT

FY Recommended and Proposed Budgets at a Glance. (in millions)

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COUNTY MANAGER RECOMMENDATIONS UPDATE

PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA FY201 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET

BUSINESS SERVICES MISSION STATEMENT

City of. Carmelita Flagpole, circa 1927

Department of Juvenile Justice. FY2011 Amended and FY2012 Impact Statements for Budget Reductions. August 2010

MINNESOTA SPENDS AN ESTIMATED $200 MILLION PER YEAR ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

2016 Mecklenburg County, North Carolina

Our Mission: To provide Arlington County residents and businesses with high quality service in meeting their tax obligations.

PUBLIC SAFETY. Public Safety Activity Grants. Activity Overview. Activity Goals. Recent Accomplishments

Office of Policy & Priorities; Treasury Board Office; and Executive Council Office

Management & Budget Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

21 st Century Budgeting April 29, ICCCFO Spring Conference

BUDGET MESSAGE FISCAL YEAR Presented May 13, 2015

BETTER BUDGETING WASHINGTON PUBLIC TREASURERS ASSOCIATION BY: MIKE BAILEY

SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET ANALYST Budget and Management Services

A Guide for Nonprofits Receiving Fiscal and Compliance Monitoring

PUBLIC WORKS. FY 17 Recommended Public Works Budget $5,277,276

CITY OF MIAMI INTER OFFICE MEMORANDUM. TO: Honorable Mayor and Members DATE: May 23, 2016 of the City Commission

FY Budget Forecast. January 26, 2010

Section III BUDGET PREPARATION

FY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

CITY OF LIVINGSTON ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN MARCH 2019

Citizen s Guide to the Okeechobee County Fiscal Year Budget

OFFICE OF JOE G. TEDDER, CFC Tax Collector for Polk County, Florida

ISAC New County Officers School

New York State Department of Transportation

KANSAS BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Chapter 1: Role of Performance Measurement in HUD CPD Formula Grant Programs

8. Infrastructure Division s Organizational Structure

Honorable Chairman Pat Prescott and the Pamlico County Board of Commissioners:

County Executive Office

Grants Accountant. Nature of Work

Board of Supervisors Budget Process Review. Controller s Office Budget Analysis Division November 20, 2017

Transcription:

Wake County Budget and Management Services Business Plan FY 2006-2008 Contents Mission Statement Department Overview Budgeting Environment in Wake County Major Accomplishments in FY 2005 Conceptualizing Our Goals and Services Pursuing Our Goals in FY 2006 and Beyond Attachments o Analysts Work Plan Summary o Service Matrix and Resources Summary o Choice Quadrants

Mission Statement The Budget and Management Services Department will support Wake County s fiscal integrity, accountability and performance by providing budgeting, analytical, policy and management support to the County Manager, Commissioners and departments. Department Overview Budget and Management Services (BMS) assists the County Manager in budgeting and planning operational and capital needs. The department is the lead agency for countywide management analysis and program evaluation, providing research and analysis for any department requesting assistance. The department s main responsibility is to organize the annual budget process and compile the annual budget information for all Wake County government services. Additional duties include providing financial information and policy analysis to the Board of Commissioners and County Manager, and advising departments on the financial conditions of their respective operations. BMS staff frequently lead or assist with major projects, such as school system funding, inpatient mental health facility planning, employee health care, criminal justice facility planning, solid waste operations planning, and a County-wide prioritization of services. BMS is one of the smallest departments in the County government. The department s FY 2006 budget is approximately $549,000, of which 96% is for personnel costs. BMS has seven FTEs, including one Director, one Administrative Services Coordinator, and five Budget and Management Analysts. Budgeting Environment in Wake County Wake County will face a number of budget challenges in the next few years. Most of these challenges stem from the County s rapid growth: The current population of 750,000 (2005 est.) will grow by roughly 25,000 each year, The Wake County Public School System continues to grow at an exceptional pace, and, Developers convert 27 acres of land from a natural state to a human-built environment each day. The tax base is growing as well County revenues are expected to increase by nearly $47 million in FY 2006 without a tax increase. This represents a 6.2% increase over FY 2005 revenues. Unfortunately, the demands for funding consistently exceed the available resources. The FY 2006 operating budget was unable to fund nearly $25 million in requests. The County s Capital Improvement Plan also faces challenges, primarily in funding school construction and criminal justice facilities. 2 of 8

Major Accomplishments in FY 2005 Restructured the Capital Improvement Plan budget process, allowing the organization's senior managers to have a larger role in developing the budget. Assisted County management with Schools operating and capital issues; Gained a better understanding of how local dollars are spent on public eduction. Helped develop a long range business plan for the Fire Tax district. Established a financial plan for Mental Health Operations for the next two years. The plan shows the transition from a provider of care to an assuror of care with the Local Managing Entity (LME) assuring local management of services. Improved the adopted budget book based on recommendations from the GFOA. Conceptualizing Our Goals and Services Goals. BMS organizes its work around its mission statement, and a hierarchy of goals, services, and objectives (See Figure 1). To achieve its mission, BMS pursues five goals: 1. Efficient and Effective Use of Resources Taxpayer dollars should be used in an efficient and effective manner. BMS applies this principle as it scrutinizes operating budgets, evaluates new program proposals, and monitors existing programs. 2. Building Capacity BMS strives to build the analytical capacity of staff in other departments to promote informed decision-making, make departments more accountable, and enable departments to address more issues. 3. Support Policy Decision-making Almost every policy decision made by the County Manager and the Board of Commissers has a budgetary or financial aspect. Therefore, BMS strives to provide information, analysis, and recommendations to policy makers in a clear, concise manner. 4. Long-Range Planning / Leading Organization-wide Issues Long-range planning is a value applied to nearly every budgetary and policy decision in Wake County. BMS supports this value by assisting in the development of long-range plans for County programs. Also, BMS often leads organization-wide issues that have a long-range financial impact. 5. Facilitate Understanding of the County Through the budget document, workshops and other products, BMS promotes greater understanding of County programs among County staff, elected officials, and the public. 3 of 8

Services. BMS achieves these five goals by providing three services: 1) budgetary and fiscal services, 2) long-range planning, and 3) policy analysis. The staff provides budgetary and fiscal services year-round, but, generally, the annual budget process ramps up in February and continues until the Commissioners adopt a budget in late June. BMS leads the annual budget process and helps policy makers produce a balanced budget, as required by state statute. During these five months, analysts review and evaluate budget requests, assist departments in developing proposals for expansions, and convey budget information to policy makers and the public in a clear, concise manner. The services of long-range planning and policy analysis are also provided year-round. During the annual budget process, County staff and other stakeholders often identify issues to which BMS staff will provide planning and analysis services. Following adoption of the annual budget, BMS compiles a list of the identified issues and and other projects important to the County Manager. Since staff time is a limited resource, the Director and staff identify those issues and projects that are the highest priority. These are selected using such criteria as County Manager priorities, Board priorities, departmental requests, financial impact and others. The selected issues and projects become work objectives in an employee s work plan. Less important issues and projects may be postponed or assigned to other departments. For each of the three goals, staff has identified specific objectives. These are listed in Figure 1. 4 of 8

Figure 1. Budget and Management Services Department Mission, Goals, Services, and Objective Mission The Budget and Management Services Department (BMS) supports Wake County s fiscal integrity, accountability and performance by providing budgeting, analytical, policy and management support to the County Manager, Commissioners and departments. Goals Efficient and Effective Use of Resources Building Capacity Support Policy Decision-making Long-Range Planning / Leading Organizationwide Issues Facilitate Understanding of the County Services Budgetary and Fiscal Services Long-Range Planning Policy Analysis Objectives Produce and maintain a balanced budget Promote efficient and effective use of County resources Financial reporting and analysis Business consulting and program evaluation Setting financial policies Agenda items Leading organization-wide issues Achieve consensus and understanding with departments on budget recommendations Build financial management capacity in departments Communicate issues and decisions to organization Communicate issues and decisions to public / facilitate understanding Promote long-term planning and strategic thinking Promote efficient and effective use of County resources Business planning / Service prioritization Financial reporting and analysis Leading organization-wide issues Business consulting and program evaluation Promote rational thinking Policy analysis, options, and recommendations Answering information requests from policy makers Agenda items 5 of 8

Pursuing Our Goals in FY 2006 and Beyond In FY 2006, most of the department s work will focus on departmental programs or organization-wide issues. Each analyst has several issues listed as work objectives in their individual work plan. 1 Attachment A lists all the work objectives in staffs FY06 work plans. The listing includes 37 separate objectives all of which align with at least one department goal. This list may be updated throughout the fiscal year as work objectives are modified, added, or removed. During the fiscal year, BMS will also focus on challenges and issues internal to the department. These include: 1. Determine Need for Additional Staff The Manager s Office and County departments request more services from the budget office than the staff can provide. With the considerable number of work requests, and the wide scope of many requests, we believe that our resources (time and energy) are being used at maximum capacity. To test this perception, we are using a time tracker tool to record activities during each work day. This tool will provide the data needed to analyze how staff use their available time, and whether additional staff is needed. 2. Minimize the Tendency to Exceed Work Capacity Another challenge, closely related to the need for additional staff, is to not exceed the work capacity of our seven employees. As the department is assigned more work, particularly from the Manager s Office, it is important to monitor the available capacity of staff and to only commit to issues/projects for which capacity is available. The BMS staff believe this is an important issue, since exceeding capacity can adversely affect the quality of work, lead to a stressful work environment, and lead to staff turnover. Improvement in this area will require more communication and understanding between BMS and the Manager s Office. 3. Establish and Adhere to Project Deadlines Following the FY 2006 budget process, BMS staff identified adherence to deadlines as a challenge. Whether during the annual budget process, or other process, it is important that staff know about and meet deadlines. Missing deadlines can adversely affect the work schedules of others, as well as product quality and timeliness. BMS will address this issue by using more checklists and calendar tools. The Director will also hold the staff accountable for missing deadlines. 1 Work objectives and work plans are elements of the County s PDMS system (Position Development and Management System), which is updated annually. 7 of 8

Related Business Plan Documents Attachment B: Service Matrix and Resource Summary The service matrix summarizes each of the three services BMS provides. The resources summary shows the cost of these services in FY 2006, and projected costs for FY 2007 and FY 2008. These estimates assume that the department maintains the same service level and staffing. The services matrix will be updated following submission of its FY07 budget request. Attachment C: Service Ranking and Funding by Choice Quadrant Level Each department classifies its services into one of four quadrants based on programmatic and funding discretion. BMS classifies all three services as green, indicating that Wake County has both program choice and funding choice in providing budget services. State statute (G.S. 159-8) requires Counties to adopt an annual budget and appoint a budget officer, but does not require a budget staff. 8 of 8