Riverview Census Data Aggregation

Similar documents
Commission District 4 Census Data Aggregation

Northwest Census Data Aggregation

Zipe Code Census Data Aggregation

Zipe Code Census Data Aggregation

Independence, MO Data Profile 2015

Mid - City Industrial

Tyler Area Economic Overview

2018:IIIQ Nevada Unemployment Rate Demographics Report*

University of Minnesota

Camden Industrial. Minneapolis neighborhood profile. About this area. Trends in the area. Neighborhood in Minneapolis.

Shingle Creek. Minneapolis neighborhood profile. About this area. Trends in the area. Neighborhood in Minneapolis. October 2011

Town Profiles: Demographic, Economic, and Housing Statistics for De Smet City and Wall Town, SOuth Dakota

Economic Overview. Lawrence, KS MSA

Economic Overview City of Tyler, TX. January 8, 2018

Economic Overview York County, South Carolina. February 14, 2018

ECONOMIC OVERVIEW DuPage County, Illinois

PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER

Economic Overview Long Island

MEMORANDUM. Gloria Macdonald, Jennifer Benedict Nevada Division of Health Care Financing and Policy (DHCFP)

Economic Overview Monterey County, California. July 22, 2016

Economic Overview Loudoun County, Virginia. October 23, 2017

TABLE 1. PROFILE OF GENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE...3 EMPLOYMENT TRENDS...5 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE...5 WAGE TRENDS...6 COST OF LIVING INDEX...6 INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT...7

October 28, Economic Overview Yellowstone County, Montana

Economic Overview Western New York

Economic Overview Fairfax / Falls Church. October 23, 2017

ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

Economic Overview Capital District

Economic Overview Mohawk Valley

ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

Washington, DC. HFA Performance Data Reporting- Borrower Characteristics

Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements, May U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS bls.gov

Local Business Profile All Sectors - Fairfield city, Ohio. Contents. What will I find in this report? My Customers

Economic Overview Prince William/Manassas. October 23, 2017

Economic Overview New York

Economic Overview Long Island

The Trails. 1,500 sf Space Available. In a 3 Mile Radius 69,985 Population 25,450 Households $78,216 Avg HH Inc. 1,500 sf Corner Space

Economic Overview 45-Minute Commute From Airport Park. June 6, 2017

Economic Overview Plant City Region. April 5, 2017

Trend Analysis of Changes to Population and Income in Philadelphia, using American Community Survey (ACS) Data

Blackstone Falls Application for Subsidized Housing

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

APPENDIX 6: CENSUS DATA BURLINGTON, VERMONT

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean. Population Entire MSA

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

2016 Labor Market Profile

June 9, Economic Overview Billings, MT MSA

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

Lapkoff & Gobalet Demographic Research, Inc.

A Profile of the Working Poor, 2011

In 2012, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, about. A Profile of the Working Poor, Highlights CONTENTS U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

LAND FOR SALE Blair Road, Mint Hill, NC PROPERTY OVERVIEW. Large parcel with I-485 access via Blair Road exit in the path of. growth.

Economic Overview Marlboro County Labor Shed. June 29, 2016

Tell us what you think. Provide feedback to help make American Community Survey data more useful for you.

SOUTH LOUISVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

Regional Data Snapshot

Monte Vista Population, ,744 4,651 4,564 4,467 4,458 4,432 4,451

LAKE FOREST NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

Economic Overview Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC MSA. October 27, 2017

In Baltimore City today, 20% of households live in poverty, but more than half of the

GERMANTOWN-PARISTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

OLD LOUISVILLE-LIMERICK (OLD LOU-LMK) NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

Women in the Labor Force: A Databook

SHELBY PARK NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

ALL RETIREMENT PLAN COVERAGE TABLES

Transcription:

Riverview Census Data Aggregation 2011-2015 American Community Survey Data, U.S. Census Bureau Table 1 (page 2) Table 2 (page 2) Table 3 (page 3) Table 4 (page 4) Table 5 (page 4) Table 6 (page 5) Table 7 (page 6) Table 8 (page 6) Table 9 (Page 7) Population by Race and Ethnicity Housing Occupancy and Tenure (own/rent) Population by Age and Sex Per Captia and Median Household Income Educational Attainment Income & Benefits Poverty Status Employment Status Owner-Occupied Housing Unit Value Prepared by the Unified Government Wyandotte Co/Kansas City, KS Research Division 10/5/2017

TABLE 1 Population Summary by Race/Hispanic 1 or Latino Origin, All Ages Race One Race White Black or African American American Indian & Alaska Native Asian Native Hawaiian & Other Pacific Islander Some Other Race Two or More Races Total Population All Ages Number Percent 16,797 97.7% 10,158 59.1% 1,859 10.8% 205 1.2% 1,167 6.8% 14 0.1% 3,394 19.7% 389 2.3% 17,186 100.0% Hispanic or Latino and Race Hispanic or Latino (of any race) Not Hispanic or Latino One Race White Black or African American American Indian & Alaska Native Asian Native Hawaiian & Other Pacific Islander Some Other Race Two or More Races Total Population 9,910 57.7% 7,276 42.3% 7,043 41.0% 3,884 22.6% 1,824 10.6% 177 1.0% 1,144 6.7% 14 0.1% 233 1.4% 17,186 100.0% 1 Persons of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity can be of any race. TABLE 2 Housing Occupancy and Tenure Category Housing Units Occupied Units Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied Vacant Units Count Pct 7,077 --- 5,869 82.9% 2,537 43.2% 3,332 56.8% 1,208 17.1% 1. American Community Survey (ACS) data are estimates only. Caution should be used when comparing to decennial census data. Further, comparisons with other ACS data time periods should be avoided. 3. Data from the ACS are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error which is inherent for the data in this table. The 2011-2015 ACS 5-year estimates are averages over the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015. 10/5/2017 PAGE 2

TABLE 3 Population by Age & Sex Age Male Female Total Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Under 5 years 818 8.9% 710 8.9% 1,528 8.9% 5 to 9 years 916 9.9% 804 10.1% 1,720 10.0% 10 to 14 years 625 6.8% 719 9.0% 1,344 7.8% 15 to 17 years 384 4.2% 363 4.6% 747 4.3% 18 and 19 years 230 2.5% 165 2.1% 395 2.3% 20 years 148 1.6% 63 0.8% 211 1.2% 21 years 92 1.0% 149 1.9% 241 1.4% 22 to 24 years 315 3.4% 319 4.0% 634 3.7% 25 to 29 years 753 8.2% 699 8.8% 1,452 8.4% 30 to 34 years 949 10.3% 617 7.7% 1,566 9.1% 35 to 39 years 862 9.3% 601 7.5% 1,463 8.5% 40 to 44 years 517 5.6% 493 6.2% 1,010 5.9% 45 to 49 years 599 6.5% 408 5.1% 1,007 5.9% 50 to 54 years 584 6.3% 366 4.6% 950 5.5% 55 to 59 years 533 5.8% 400 5.0% 933 5.4% 60 and 61 years 139 1.5% 169 2.1% 308 1.8% 62 to 64 years 232 2.5% 220 2.8% 452 2.6% 65 and 66 years 89 1.0% 62 0.8% 151 0.9% 67 to 69 years 128 1.4% 144 1.8% 272 1.6% 70 to 74 years 177 1.9% 163 2.0% 340 2.0% 75 to 79 years 50 0.5% 114 1.4% 164 1.0% 80 to 84 years 56 0.6% 88 1.1% 144 0.8% 85 years and over 26 0.3% 128 1.6% 154 0.9% Total 9,222 100.0% 7,964 100.0% 17,186 100.0% 1. American Community Survey (ACS) data are estimates only. Caution should be used when comparing to decennial census data. Further, comparisons with other ACS data time periods should be avoided. 3. Data from the ACS are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error which is inherent for the data in this table. The 2011-2015 ACS 5-year estimates are averages over the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015. 10/5/2017 PAGE 3

TABLE 4 Economic Data 1 Per Capita Income Median Household Income $13,098 $27,847 TABLE 5 Educational Attainment Category Population 25 years and over Less than 9th grade 9th to 12th grade, no diploma High school graduate (incl. equivalency) Some college, no degree Associate's degree Bachelor's degree Graduate of professional degree Estimate Count Pct. 10,366 --- 2,508 24.2% 1,883 18.2% 2,997 28.9% 1,622 15.6% 539 5.2% 547 5.3% 270 2.6% Percent high school graduate or higher ---- 57.6% Percent bachelor's degree or higher ---- 7.9% 1 Per capita and median household incomes are in 2015 inflation-adjusted dollars. All figures in Table 4 were derived by calculating a weighted average. 1. Per capita income, median household income and educational attainment data in the tables above are available down to the block group level. 2. American Community Survey (ACS) data are estimates only. Caution should be used when comparing to decennial census data. Further, comparisons with other ACS data time periods should be avoided. 3. Data may be estimated due to area of selection based on block group or tract level Census geography. 4. Data from the ACS are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error which is inherent for the data in this table. The 2011-2015 ACS 5-year estimates are averages over the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015. 10/5/2017 PAGE 4

TABLE 6 Income and Benefits (Households) 1 Income Categories Count of Households Percent Total Households Less than $10,000 $10,000 to $14,999 $15,000 to $19,999 $20,000 to $24,999 $25,000 to $29,999 $30,000 to $34,999 $35,000 to $39,999 $40,000 to $44,999 $45,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $59,999 $60,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $124,999 $125,000 to $149,999 $150,000 to $199,999 $200,000 or more 5,869 100.0% 1,280 21.8% 509 8.7% 473 8.1% 400 6.8% 485 8.3% 328 5.6% 411 7.0% 328 5.6% 292 5.0% 300 5.1% 482 8.2% 270 4.6% 212 3.6% 55 0.9% 32 0.5% 12 0.2% 1 Income and Benefits are in 2015 inflation adjusted dollars. 1. American Community Survey (ACS) data are estimates only. Caution should be used when comparing to decennial census data. Further, comparisons with other ACS data time periods should be avoided. 3. Data from the ACS are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error which is inherent for the data in this table. The 2011-2015 ACS 5-year estimates are averages over the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015. 10/5/2017 PAGE 5

TABLE 7 Poverty Status 1 Age / Category # Persons for whom Poverty Determined Income in the past 12 months below poverty level Under 5 Years 5 to 17 Years 18 to 64 Years 65 Years & Over Estimate Count Pct. 16,812 --- 6,092 36.2% 719 47.8% 1,716 45.1% 3,384 32.9% 268 22.0% 1 All persons below poverty are those whose income in the past 12 months was below the poverty level. Universe for children under 5 years and 5 to 17 years is "Related children under 18 years". TABLE 8 Employment Status Category Count Percent Population 16 Years & Over In Labor Force (Civilian) Employed Unemployed Not in Labor Force Unemployment Rate 12,356 100.0% 7,903 64.0% 6,935 56.1% 952 7.7% 4,453 36.0% --- 12.0% 1. Poverty data is available only at the Census tract level and therefore poverty for selected area of interest may be an estimate. 2. American Community Survey (ACS) data are estimates only. Caution should be used when comparing to decennial census data. Further, comparisons with other ACS data time periods should be avoided. 3. Data may be estimated due to area of selection based on block group or tract level Census geography. 4. Data from the ACS are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error which is inherent for the data in this table. The 2011-2015 ACS 5-year estimates are averages over the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015. 10/5/2017 PAGE 6

TABLE 9 Value of Owner-Occupied Housing Units Value Total Owner-Occupied Housing Units Less than $10,000 $10,000 to $14,999 $15,000 to $19,999 $20,000 to $24,999 $25,000 to $29,999 $30,000 to $34,999 $35,000 to $39,999 $40,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $59,999 $60,000 to $69,999 $70,000 to $79,999 $80,000 to $89,999 $90,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $124,999 $125,000 to $149,999 $150,000 to $174,999 $175,000 to $199,999 $200,000 to $249,999 $250,000 to $299,999 $300,000 to $399,999 $400,000 to $499,999 $500,000 to $749,999 $750,000 to $999,999 $1,000,000 or more Count of Owner- Occupied Housing Units Pct. of Total 2,537 100.0% 67 2.6% 40 1.6% 15 0.6% 96 3.8% 129 5.1% 132 5.2% 152 6.0% 306 12.1% 280 11.0% 381 15.0% 354 14.0% 147 5.8% 111 4.4% 134 5.3% 69 2.7% 65 2.6% 40 1.6% 11 0.4% 8 0.3% Median Owner-Occupied Housing Value 4 $58,285 1. American Community Survey (ACS) data are estimates only. Caution should be used when comparing to decennial census data. Further, comparisons with other ACS data time periods should be avoided. 3. Data from the ACS are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error which is inherent for the data in this table. The 2011-2015 ACS 5-year estimates are averages over the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015. 4. Median owner-occupied housing value is derived by calculating a weighted average. 10/5/2017 PAGE 7