SHARE OF 10% RETENTION COSTS DWR)

Similar documents
The Transfer Policy has been revised over the years to reflect the City' s infrastructure, wastewater demand factors and economic conditions.

on ' the Gonsumer Price Index for 111 Urban Consumers

ITEM 53. Council to Consider the Following 1 Hold a Public Hearing and 2 Introduce Ordinance to Amend Section a of the Lathrop Municipal Code

San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency Seth Wurzel February 26, 2018

The Lathrop District Chamber of Commerce has requested that the City Council

Adequate Progress Report

Council Agenda Report

REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

ITEM 49 RESOLUTION DECLARING EQUIPMENT SURPLUS PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THEIR DISPOSAL FEBRUARY CITY COUNCIL MEETING

Presented by: Connie Perkins, PE, CFM April 20, 2016

City of Calistoga Staff Report

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

LAFCo 509 W. WEBER AVENUE SUITE 420 STOCKTON, CA 95203

CITY OF GLENDALE CALIFORNIA JOINT REPORT TO THE GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL, THE GLENDALE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA 90755

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 891. Section familiarizes the reader with the Town and includes the Transmittal. directory

RESOLUTION NO. A. In 2008, Los Angeles County voters approved Measure R, a sales tax based transportation improvement program.

Staff Report City of Manhattan Beach

Item No. 29 Town of Atherton

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

RESOLUTION NO

Carla Hansen, Management Analyst II Peggy Flynn, Public Communications Coordinator Cathy Capriola, Assistant City Manager

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION

Finance Department 1901 Airport Road, Suite 210 South Lake Tahoe, CA (530) FAX

Staff Report Page No. 1 of 7. CONSENT CALENDAR Agenda Item No.: 7g CC Mtg.: 04/12/2016. April 12,2016 DATE: Mayor and City Council Members TO: FROM:

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Signal Hill Safety Element was last updated in 1986; and

CITY OF GLENDALE CALIFORNIA REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL. Christina R. Sansone, General CounseL... ~~

2. e Concord REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

CITY COUNCIL Quasi-Judicial Matter

CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 2 WITH RINCON CONSULTANTS FOR WORK ON THE NOVATO GENERAL PLAN 2035 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Petr Skala, Engineer II Christopher J. Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer

COUNCIL AGENDA AND AMERICAN CANYON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD JOINT STAFF REPORT

RESOLUTION WHEREAS, on July 24, 2017 a Scoping Meeting was noticed and held pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15083; and,

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORANGE REPEALING RESOLUTION NO AND APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF

WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted an annual evaluation of the City Attorney, Randolph Hom; and

Urban Level of Protection Adequate Progress Report

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton

MEMORANDUMM TO: FROM: FOR DATE: Providing for IMPACT. upgrade. No (Fire. Item 9.c. - Page 1

Agenda Item No. 6A February 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council. Laura Kuhn, City Manager (Staff Contact: Mark Mazzaferro, (707) )

M E M O R A N D U M. Administration Department

CA: RMM: rmd254/hpca City Council Meeting Santa Monica, California RESOLUTION NUMBER 7231(CCS) (City Council Series)

3. The City Council appointed seven hoteliers as the TPRA advisory committee to guide and monitor the annual marketing effort.

INTERIM DEPT. DIRECTOR: PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THE FY 2017/18 ENCINITAS LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT

2. fl Concord REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL/AGENCY BOARD

MEMORANDUM DEBORAH MALICOAT, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT AMENDING THE BELMONT VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN (BVSP)

RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NO. CC

NOVATO GENERAL PLAN 2035 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

Bob Brown, Community Development Director Annette Chavez, Chief Building Official Gail Papworth, Principal Human Resources Analyst

ORDINANCE NO. CID-3193

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS AUTHORIZING A NEW DEPOSITORY BANKING RELATIONSHIP WITH UMPQUA BANK

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND. FROM: Toni J. Taber, CM1 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. DATE: November 5, Approval of Adjusted Campaign Contribution Limits.

_ Draft Letter Attached

Barton Brierley, AICP, Community Development Director (Staff Contact: Tyra Hays, AICP, (707) )

RESOLUTION NO

ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER. City Council ofthe City ofc*p- Mike Wiltermood, CIEOL--0U September 18,2015

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT June 3, 2015 Page 2 of 2 Previous Central County Program 20a fund allocations helped advance transportation programs p

CITY OF HOBOKEN HUDSON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY RESOLUTION TO AMEND BUDGET

PRESENTER: Chris Blunk, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer

To: Board of Directors Date: July 12, 2012

CITY OF ROCK ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. O AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROCK ISLAND, ROCK ISLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ADOPTING TAX INCREMENT ALLOCATION FI

Citv Council Staff Report

TOWN OF SOUTHPORT 1139 Pennsylvania Avenue Elmira, NY 14904

SUBJECT: 1. APPROVE RESOLUTION NO , DISTRICT INTENT TO REIMBURSE EXPENSES FROM FINANCING SOLAR PROJECT ACTION

CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No Key Words: Council Compensation Meeting Date: December 9, 2014 PREPARED BY:

Lathrop' s Sanitary Sewer Management Plan WW 11-08

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL MONTE

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

RESOLUTIONS OF THE CITY OF HELENA, MONTANA

Solano Local Agency Formation Commission 675 Texas St. Ste Fairfield, California (707) FAX: (707)

RESOLUTION NO

Meeting Date: December 13, 2017

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

6/10/2015 Item #10C Page 1

SPECIAL MEETING A G E N D A. C. PUBLIC COMMENT (on items within the purview of the Oversight Board and not listed on the agenda)

NAME OF MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY LINCOLN & 394 CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE ZONE ORDINANCE NUMBER

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY

DOUGLAS S. STACK, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS /CITY ENGINEER ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE MOFFETT DRIVE ( CIP 70224)

Agenda Report. TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: March FROM:

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1174

#17. July 27, 2010 MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS

CITY OF HEALDSBURG RESOLUTION NO

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Signatory Authorizations

RESOLUTION 5-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEHACHAPI-CUMMINGS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SETTING WATER RATES

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE SETTING FORTH RATES AND CHARGES FOR GLENDALE WATER AND POWER ELECTRIC SERVICE

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BELMONT ADDING CHAPTER 32 (MINIMUM WAGE) TO THE BELMONT CITY CODE

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

M E M O R A N D U M. SUBJECT: Agenda Item 3.1 Review and Consideration of Final Budget for FY 2018/19

Board of Retirement Regular Meeting

Central Marin Police Authority

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT # FLOOD HAZARDS

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO Section 1. The City Council finds the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.

NOTICE AND CALL OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE KERMAN CITY COUNCIL. The sole business to be conducted is as follows:

WHEREAS, after due notice, the City Planning Commission and the City Council did conduct public hearings on this matter; and,

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Transcription:

I j ITEM 4.6 ', CITY MANAGER' S REPORT MAY 16, 2016, CITY COUNCIL MEETING ITEM: APPROVE RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING ADEQUATE FUNDING TO COVER THE STATE' S SHARE OF 10% RETENTION COSTS RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution Acknowledging Adequate Funding to Cover the State' s share of 10% Retention Costs Associated with UFRR Grant from State Department of Water Resources DWR) SUMNIARY: California Senate Bill 5 ( S65), passed in 2007 and later amended by various bills, requires the State to develop and adopt a comprehensive Central Valley Flood Protection Plan ( CVFPP), which was approved by the Central Valley Flood Protection Board ( CVFPB) in June 2012. SB5 restricts development approvals after July 2, 2016 unless a permitting agency can make a finding of ` Adequate Progress" toward providing an Urban Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP), which includes protection from a 200- year flood. The cities of Lathrop and Manteca and our development community have been funding the efforts required to prepare the ULOP 200- year flood maps and to analyze the existing Reclamation District No. 17 levees against the Urban Levee Design Criteria ( ULDC) recently created by DWR, and the total expenditures to date exceed 3 million. The City of Lathrop applied to the California Department of Water Resources ( DWR) for an Urban Flood Risk Reduction_ (UFRR) grant on August 19, 2015. DWR offered Lathrop a $ 10 million dollar grant to be funded 50% by State funding 5 million) and 50% by local matching funds ($ 5 million), to pursue a State - Feasibility Study and to perform initial design for a ULOP 200- year flood protection project within Reclamation District No. 17 ( RD 17). Lathrop is currently negotiating a revised scope for the $ 10 million UFRR grant, with the first phase of work to be shared at $353, 180 State and $ 353, 180 Lathrop, with the Lathrop costs to be entirely funded from credit for sums previously expended by City on SB5 studies. DWR guidelines for the UFRR program require that the local agency demonstrate sufficient financial capability to cover the local share of the project plus, for cash flow purposes, a 10% retention from each reimbursement payment made to the grant recipient, to be fully reimbursed by the State at the time of the project' s completion and acceptance by the State. For this reason, the City of Lathrop, as the grant recipient, will be required to fund temporarily up State' s share of the 10% retention of the identified work. to $ 35, 318 to cover the

CITY MANAGER' S REPORT Page 2 MAY 16, 2016 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FUNDIMG TO COVER' THE STATE' S SHARE OF 10% RETENTION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH UFRR GRANT BACKGROUND: California Senate Bill 5 ( SB5) was passed in 2007 and later amended by various bills. SB5 requires the State to develop and adopt a comprehensive Central Valley Flood Protection Plan ( CVFPP), which was approved by the Central Valley Flood Protection Board ( CVFPB) in June 2012. As amended, SB5 also requires all cities and counties in the Central Valley to incorporate the CVFPP into their general plans by July 2, 2015 and into their zoning ordinances by ] uly 2, 2016. SB5 restricts development beyond July 2, 2016 unless a permitting agency can make a finding of Adequate Progress" toward providing an Urban Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP), which includes protection from a 200- year flood. REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION: DWR offered Lathrop a $ 10 million grant, to be funded $ 5 million from the State and matched with $ 5 million from the City of Lathrop, to pursue a State Feasibility Study and to perform initial design for a ULOP 200- year flood protection project within Reclamation District No. 17 ( RD 17). Lathrop is currently negotiating a revised scope for the $ 10 million UFRR grant, with the first phase of work to be shared at $ 353, 180 State and $ 353, 180 Lathrop, with the Lathrop costs to be entirely funded from Credit for sums previously expended by City on SB5 studies. DWR guidelines for the UFRR program require that the local agency demonstrate sufficient financial capability to cover the local share of the project plus, for cash flow purposes, a 10% retention from each reimbursement payment made to the grant recipient, to be fully reimbursed by the State at the time of the project' s completion and acceptance by the State. For this reason, the City of Lathrop, as the grant recipient, will be required to fund temporarily up State' s share of the 10% retention of the identified work. to $35, 318 to cover the Staff is recommending that City Council acknowledge adequate funding to cover temporarily the State share of 10% retention costs ( estimated not to exceed 50, 000) associated with the Urban Flood Risk Reduction grant from the Department of Water Resources until the Sfate reimburses that amount. FISCAL IMPACT At this time, there is no fiscal impact associated with this item as the City has not entered into contract with an agency to perform the initial phase of the project. However, based on the DWR grant guidelines once the contract is fully executed, the City will commit to cover the 10% retention costs until fully reimbursed by the State at the completion and acceptance of the project. At the initial phase of the project, the City' s retention estimates total $ 35, 318. To allow for adjustments in the cost of this first phase of work, the attached resolution recognizes the need to fund temporarily up to $ 50, 000 to cover the State' s share of the 10% retention of

CITY MANAGER' S REPOItT Page 3 NIAY 16, 201fs CITY COUIVCIL IuIEETING FllNDING TO CO\/ ER THE ST147E' S SIiA te OF 10% RETE101TYON COSTS AS OCIATED 1IVITI-I UFRR GRANT the identified work. A separate item will be presented to Council to approve the contract for the initial phase. e4tt/4ch iw E NTS: A. Resolution Acknowledging Adequate Funding to Cover the State' s share of 10% Retention Costs Associated with UFRR Grant from State Department of Water Resources B. Letter to Department of Water Resource dated May 16, 2016 Re: City of Lathrop Urban Flood Risk Reduction Grant Authorization of Funding to Cover State' s Share of Retention

Salva14' wr... CITY MANAGER' S REPORT Page 3 MAY 16, 2016 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FUNDING TO COVER THE STATE' S SHARE OF 10% RETENTION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH UFRR GRANT I APPROVALS: Glenn Gebhardt City Engineer Dat a. ht f'r+j, cj I 3 l tr, r Cari James Date Finance Director a. r J /3- / v or IVavarrete City Attorney Date Step Salvatore Date Ci " Manager 3 1l

RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LATHROP ACKNOWLEDGING ADEQUATE FUNDING TO COVER THE STATE' S SHARE OF 10% RETENTION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH UFRR GRANT FROM STATE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES WHEREAS, California Senate Bill 5 ( SB5), passed in 2007 and later amended by various bills, requires the State to develop and adopt a comprehensive Central Valley Flood Protection Plan ( CVFPP), which approved by the Central Valley Flood Protection Board ( CVFPB) in June 2012; and WHEREAS, SB5 also requires all cities and counties in the Central Valley to incorporate the CVFPP into their general plans by July 2, 2015 and into their zoning ordinances by July 2, 2016; and WHEREAS, 5B5 restricts development approvals after July 2, 2016 unless a permitting agency can make a finding of Adequate Frogress" toward providing an Urban Level of Flood Protection ( ULOP), which includes protection from a 200- year flood; and WHEREAS, the cities of Lathrop and Manteca and our development community have been funding the efforts required to prepare the ULOP 200- year flood maps and to analyze the existing Reclamation District No. 17 levees against the Urban Levee Design Criteria ( ULDC) recently created by DWR, and the total expenditures to date have exceeded $ 3 million; and WHEREAS, the City of Lathrop applied to the California Department of Water Resources ( DWR) for an Urban Flood Risk Reduction ( UFRR) grant on August 19, 2015; and WHEREAS, DWR offered Lathrop a $ 10 million grant-funded 50% by State funding ($ 5 million) and 50% by local matching funds ($ 5 million), to pursue a State Feasibility Study and to perform initial design for a ULOP 200- year flood protection project within Reclamation District No. 17 ( RD 17); and WHEREAS, Lathrop is currently negotiating a revised scope for the $ 10 million UFRR grant, with the first phase of work to be shared at $353, 180 State and $ 353, 180 Lathrop, with the Lathrop costs to be entirely funded from Credit for sums previously expended by City on SB5 studies; and WHEREAS, DWR guidelines for the UFRR program require that the local agency demonstrate sufficient financial capability to cover the local share of the project plus, for cash flow purposes, a 10% retention from each reimbursement payment made to the grant recipient, to be fully reimbursed by the State at the time of the project' s completion and acceptance by the State; and Page 1 of 3

WHEREAS, for this reason, the City of Lathrop, as the grant recipient, will be required to fund temporarily up to $ 35, 318 to cover the State' s share of.the 10% retention of the identified work; and WHEREAS, although the $ 35, 318 does not represent an ultimate cost to the City of Lathrop, the City will carry this cost for the duration of the contract with DWR until the State reimburses that amount; and WHEREAS, to allow for adjustments in the cost of this first phase of work, the City of Lathrop is recognizing the need to fund temporarily up to $ 50, 000 to cover the State' s share of the 10% retention of the identified work; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lathrop hereby acknowledges adequate funding to cover temporarily the State' s share of 10% retention costs ( estimated not to exceed $ 50, 000) associated with the Urban Flood Risk Reduction grant from 'the Department of Water Resources until that amount is reimbursed by the State. Page 2 of 3

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Lathrop this 16th day of May 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Sonny Dhaliwal, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Teresa Vargas, City Clerk i y rney Page 3 of 3

ty of Laf ro; p-- ATTACHMENT " B" City Manager's Office 390 Towne Centre Drive, Lathrop, CA, 95330 Phone: ( 209) 941-7220 Fax: ( 209) 941-7268 www.ci.lathrop. ca.us May 16, 2016 Department of Water Resources Eric Martinez, Project Manager 3464 El Camino Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95821 AFT Re: City of Lathrop Urban Flood Risk Reduction Grant Authorization of Funding to Cover State' s Share of Retention Dear Mr. Martinez: I am responding to your request to document the authority of the City of Lathrop to commit to funding for the Urban Flood Risk Reduction (UFRR) grant from the State. Department of Water Resources ( DWR) guidelines for the UFRR program require that the local agency demonstrate sufficient financial capability to cover the local share of the project plus, for cash flow purposes, a 10% retention from each reimbursement payment made to the grant recipient, to be fully reimbursed by the State at the time of the project' s completion and acceptance by the State. For this reason, the City of Lathrop, as the grant recipient, will be required to fund temporarily up to $35,318 to cover the State' s share of the 10% retention of the identified work. Lathrop has committed to funding the local share of the UFRR grant. This commitment letter to temporarily fund the cost of this$ 35,318 retention has been provided to the City Council for their approval. Although the $35,318 does not represent an ultimate cost to the City of Lathrop, the City will carry this cost for the duration of the contract. To allow for adjustments in the cost of this first phase of work, the attached resolution recognizes the need to fund temporarily up to $50,000 to cover the State' s share of the 10% retention of the identified work. Based on the City Council' s approval of the attached resolution on May 16, 2016, please accept this letter as confirmation of the City of s Lathrop' agreement to cover the 10% State retention (estimated not to exceed 50,000) until the State pays that amount.

C ty f Lc - - t- r r- City llfanager's Office 390 Towne Centre Drive, Lathrop, CA, 95330 Phone: ( 209) 941-7220 Fax: ( 209) 941-7268 www.ci.lathrop.ca.us If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. I can be reached by email at ssalvatorec ci.lathrop.ca.us or by phone (209) 941-7220. Thank you, Stephen Salvatore City Manager cc: Salvador Navarrete, City Attorney. Glenn Gebhardt, City Engineer Cari James, Finance Director Encl: Lathrop Council Resolution No. 16-