Economic Impact of the Arizona Mining Industry. Arizona Mining Association 916 W. Adams Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007

Similar documents
NAVAJO GENERATING STATION AND KAYENTA MINE: An Economic Impact Study

Presented by: Shayna Olesiuk, Regional Manager, FDIC Division of Insurance and Research (415)

Arizona Low Income Housing Tax Credit and Housing Trust Fund Economic and Fiscal Impact Report

Arizona Travel Impacts p

ARIZONA S HOUSING MARKET....a glance

THE NUMBER OF BUSINESSES IN ARIZONA

ARIZONA TAX RESEARCH ASSOCIATION

Arizona Travel Impacts p

Receipts & Expenditures

Economic Impact on Arizona Of Repeal of Funding Provisions Of the Affordable Care Act

Arizona Travel Impacts p

by Dr. Madan M. Singh Arizona Department of Mines & Mineral Resources Special Report 26 November 2009 State of Arizona Jan Brewer, Governor

Memo. County Officials From: CSA Staff Date: May 5, 2017 Subject: County Revenue & Expenditure Projections for FY

Arizona Tax 101. Arizona Tax Research Association Outlook Conference. Kevin McCarthy. President, ATRA. Steve Barela

Definitions See A.R.S Government Lessor: A city, town, county or county stadium district. The GPLET will apply if:

Board of Governors Meeting June 12, 2013

Economic Impacts of the First 5 Placer Children & Families Commission s Funded Programs

ARIZONA TAX RESEARCH ASSOCIATION

HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION FINANCIAL RATIO UPDATE

HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION FINANCIAL RATIO UPDATE

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF SUCCESSFUL COMMERCIAL FIRE INTERVENTIONS PHOENIX FIRE DEPARTMENT JUNE AUGUST, 2012

THE ECONOMIC BASE OF ARIZONA, METROPOLITAN PHOENIX, METROPOLITAN TUCSON, THE BALANCE OF THE STATE, AND CHANDLER

FY 2015 BUDGET REVIEW

PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED BUDGET

THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE OIL AND NATURAL GAS INDUSTRY ON THE U.S. ECONOMY: EMPLOYMENT, LABOR INCOME AND VALUE ADDED

Economic and Fiscal Impact of the Arizona Public University Enterprise

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF REPUBLIC SERVICES IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, 2014

Medicare Supplement Outline of Coverage. Plans A, F, G & N. Amerigroup Insurance Company Arizona 2018

} Proposition 109 created expenditure limitations for school districts and community college districts

BUDGET INTRODUCTORY ANALYSIS

Fiscal Impact Analysis of the North Carolina Rural Job Creation Fund

THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE OIL AND NATURAL GAS INDUSTRY ON THE U.S. ECONOMY IN 2009: EMPLOYMENT, LABOR INCOME, AND VALUE ADDED

Missouri Economic Indicator Brief: Manufacturing Industries

Alberta H. Charney, Ph.D. Marshall Vest, Director

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Green County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Morgan County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Daviess County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Lawrence County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Jefferson County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Lyon County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Boone County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Hancock County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Woodford County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Caldwell County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Hardin County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Estill County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

The Economic Impact of Short-Term Rentals In the State of Texas 2018 Update

APPENDIX 7.0-B BC Stats BC Input - Output Model Report

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE PHYSICIAN SECTOR St. Joseph County, Indiana

The Perfect Storm - Putting America s Health Care in Peril American Health Care Act + President s Budget

Board of Governors May 2013

The Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on the Woodford County Economy

Assessing the Economic Impacts of Publicly Funded Investments in Energy Efficiency Programs

Highway User Revenue Fund

SUPPLIER DIVERSITY ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT: 2017 WE KEEP LIFE FLOWING

The Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on the Owsley County Economy

BUREAU OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC RESEARCH

Macroeconomic Impact of S ESOPs on the U.S. Economy

Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Appendix G Economic Analysis Report

FY 2009 Budget Review: Arizona Community College Districts. Justin Olson Research Analyst

WHAT IS THE OUTLOOK FOR THE MINING INDUSTRY INTERNATIONALLY?

Arizona State Office of Rural Health Webinar Series

Macroeconomic Impact Analysis of Proposed Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles

WHAT IS THE OUTLOOK FOR THE MINING INDUSTRY INTERNATIONALLY?

ARROYO VERDUGO OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LOCAL PARKS FULL REPORT

Construction Impacts Operations Impacts

SANTA ANA COLLEGE THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF. July 2018 ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC IMPACT AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT OF EDUCATION

Big Chino Water Ranch Project Impact Analysis Prescott & Prescott Valley, Arizona

Fiscal Year Proposed Budget: Strategic Renewal

The Economic Contribution of the Navajo Generating Station (NGS) on the City of Page

Arizona Recent Developments

The Economic Impact of Franchised Businesses: Volume IV, 2016

THE IMPACT OF OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION AND DRILLING ON THE OKLAHOMA ECONOMY

Supremes Strike Massive Tax Increase From Ballot

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AMERICA S ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES

Value of Output in the Metal Mining, Non-Metal Mining and Total Ontario Mining Industry, $Million

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AMAZON S MAJOR CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

2016 HERNANDO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY

The Economic and Fiscal Impacts of the Port of Centralia s Industrial Parks. Prepared for the Port of Centralia

COLORADO FILM INCENTIVES

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF FEARRINGTON PLACE

ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE OKLAHOMA CAPITAL INVESTMENT BOARD S VENTURE INVESTMENT PROGRAM AND OKLAHOMA CAPITAL ACCESS PROGRAM

SANTIAGO CANYON COLLEGE

The Economic Base of Quay County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

The Economic. Impact of Veteran-Owned. Franchise. August 30, 2011

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION

The Economic Impact Of Nevada PERS

Vision. Creation. Implementation. Reality

Resolution Copper Company Economic and Fiscal Impact Report Superior, Arizona

Our service area includes these counties in:

The Economic Base of Sandoval County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

CHAPTER 6. The Economic Contribution of Hospitals

The Economic Base of Valencia County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

Weathering the Perfect Storm Arizona s Rural Health in Peril House American Health Care Act Senate Better Care Reconciliation Act

The Economic Base of Sandoval County, NM. PREPARED BY: The Office of Policy Analysis at Arrowhead Center, New Mexico State University.

The Economic Value of San Diego & Imperial Counties Community Colleges Association

Public Hearing. Truth in Taxation Notice of Tax increase Adoption of Fiscal Year 2016 Proposed Budget Board of Governor s Meeting June 10, 2015

Transcription:

Economic Impact of the Arizona Mining Industry Arizona Mining Association 916 W. Adams Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007

Table of Contents Executive Summary...3 The Arizona Mining Industry...5 Economic Impact of the Mining Industry...8 Tax Impact of the Mining Industry...14 Mining Impacts in Arizona Counties...15 Economic Impact Study Methodology...16 Economic Impact Data Sources...19 2

Executive Summary: Economic Impact 2017 The Arizona mining industry includes copper and molybdenum, lead, zinc, gold, silver, uranium, and other metal ore producers, as well as coal. Arizona mineral mining firms in 2017 employed 9,807 Arizona workers with a payroll of $1.0 billion, producing output (sales) valued at $5.9 billion. The combined worker income and before-tax business income, known as value added, was $1.2 billion for the mining industry. Value added is the contribution of the mining industry to Arizona s Gross State Product. These measures describe the direct impact of the Arizona mining industry. Purchases of intermediate goods and services by the mining industry created revenues and supported jobs for many other Arizona businesses across the mining supply chain. Meanwhile, workers in mining and supplier industries made consumer purchases, creating additional jobs and revenues in Arizona. These indirect impacts supported an additional 26,133 jobs with personal income to workers of $1.4 billion, value added of $2.4 billion, and additional output produced by Arizona businesses of $4.3 billion. The total impact of the Arizona mining industry is the sum of direct and indirect impacts, resulting in total employment of 35,940 workers with personal income of $2.5 billion, value added of $3.6 billion and output valued at $10.2 billion. The total tax revenue to Arizona state and local governments was $395 million. 3

The Mining Industry Supports Arizona Workers and Businesses Arizona Mining Industry Total Arizona Jobs Supported 35,940 9,807 Direct Jobs $1.0 billion Direct Payroll $5.9 billion Direct Output Total Income to Arizona Workers $2.5 billion Total Arizona Output/Sales $10.2 billion 4

The Arizona Mining Industry Mining has played a central role in the economy of Arizona since statehood. In 1910, one-quarter of wage earners in Arizona were employed in the mining industry. By 1970, after the state population had increased more than eightfold, copper mining was still touted as one of the Five Cs which formed the backbone of the Arizona economy. Over the past four decades, the Arizona population has more than tripled in size and the economy has continued to become more diverse, experiencing rapid growth in new high-technology industries such as semiconductors and aerospace. Because of the growth and diversification of the state s economy, the share of mining employment in total employment has declined in Arizona, as it has throughout the United States. 5 Source: Arizona Historical Society

The Arizona Mining Industry Nevertheless, Arizona remains one of the top producers of copper in the world, and the mining industry continues to play a significant role in the state s economy and is one of its most important economic base industries. Arizona consistently ranks among the top five states for non-fuel mineral resource production - the state ranked 2 nd in 2017. Source: Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Copper has been the predominant product of mining activity in Arizona for more than a century. This continues to be the case today. Other notable Arizona mining outputs include molybdenum, coal, gold, silver and uranium. The value of Arizona s mining output in 2017 was $5.9 billion. Copper represented by far the largest component, at $5.38 billion, followed by coal at $321 million and other metal ore products at $252 million. 6

Arizona was the Second Leading State for Non-Fuel Mineral Resource Production in 2017 State Rank Value According to the U. S. Geological Survey, Arizona ranked second in the nation in the value of non-fuel mineral production 2017. Note: the table includes sand and gravel, cement, and crushed stone as well as copper and other metals and minerals. 7 Percent of U.S. Total Nevada 1 $8.7 billion 11.5% Arizona 2 $6.6 billion 8.8% Texas 3 $5.2 billion 6.9% Alaska 4 $3.5 billion 4.7% California 5 $3.5 billion 4.7%

Economic Impact of The Mining Industry This study was conducted to analyze the economic impacts of mining on the state of Arizona for calendar year 2017. Four indicators were used to measure impacts: output, employment, personal income, and value added. Output is the dollar value of annual production for the component sectors of the mining industry. Employment is the average annual number of jobs due to the presence of the mining industry. Personal income is wages and benefits paid to workers, plus self employed income. Value added, the contribution to Arizona Gross State Product, includes combined personal income and before-tax business income. Economic impacts include both the direct and indirect effects of mining operations. The direct impact of an industry equals the value of its own output and employment, as well as personal and business income created, and taxes and fees paid to governments. Indirect impacts arise as firms purchase goods and services across the supply chain, and when employees spend their wages to make consumer purchases (known as the induced impact). An additional indirect impact comes from spending by state and local governments out of new tax revenues. The accompanying figure illustrates how direct and indirect impacts combined to create the total economic impact of the Arizona mining industry. 8

Total Impact is the Sum of Direct & Indirect Impacts $5.9 Billion Direct Output $4.3 Billion Indirect Output $10.2 Billion Total Output DIRECT IMPACTS 9,807 Direct Jobs Multiplier Effects 26,133 Indirect Jobs 35,940 Total Jobs In 2017, the mining industry produced direct output valued at $5.9 billion, and there were 9,807 direct mining jobs. As mining firms purchased intermediate goods and services and workers spent their incomes, an additional $4.3 billion of indirect Arizona output was created, along with another 26,133 jobs. The total economic impact of the Arizona mining industry was $10.2 billion of output and 35,940 total jobs. Each mining industry worker supported an additional 2.7 jobs in the overall economy in 2017. 9

Direct Impact of The Mining Industry Direct Impact Output Value Added Personal Income Employment Copper $5,358 $1,140 $976 9,320 Coal 321 50 42 402 Other Metal Ore (gold, lead, zinc, uranium, all other) 252 10 9 85 All Direct Impacts $5,931 $1,200 $1,027 9,807 The Arizona mining industry includes copper and molybdenum, lead, zinc, gold, silver, uranium, and other metal ore producers, as well as coal. The direct impact of the mining industry was $5.9 billion of output produced and creation of 9,807 mining jobs with worker income of $1.0 billion. The industry value added contributed $1.2 billion to Arizona s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2017. Value added is always smaller than output or sales because it is computed as output minus the cost of intermediate inputs, supplies and materials in production. 10

Indirect Impacts of the Mining Industry Indirect impact Output Indirect impacts occur as workers spend their incomes (induced effects), and as mining firms purchase materials and services from Arizona suppliers, who in turn purchase from their own suppliers and make payment to their employees. Taxes paid by firms and workers provide revenues for government spending, estimated as a separate impact in this study. These ripple effects of the multiplier process created indirect impacts of 26,133 additional Arizona jobs and additional output of $4.3 billion, with additional income to workers of $1.4 billion and additional value added to Arizona Gross State Product of $2.4 billion. 11 Value Added Personal Income Employment Supplier Purchases 1,194 760 389 5,077 Worker Spending 1,817 1,023 587 12,503 Government Spending 1,243 606 463 8,533 All Indirect Impacts $4,255 $2,389 $1,439 26,133

Indirect Impacts Benefit Other Arizona Industries Arizona Industries Output As Arizona s mining industry spending recycled in the economy, indirect impacts benefited every other Arizona industry with additional sales, jobs and worker incomes. Wholesale and retail trade, followed by the financial sector, felt the greatest impact from mining activity. Over 2,000 jobs were also supported in business services and health care. 12 Personal Income Employment Wholesale and Retail Trade 639 255 3,924 Banking, Insurance & Real Estate 496 108 3,043 Environmental/Business Services 473 243 2,904 Health Care Services 363 214 2,230 Leisure Activity and Food Services 217 82 1,330 Transportation and Warehousing 169 60 1,038 Government (including Education) 163 62 1,003 All Other Industries 1,735 415 10,661 All Indirect Impacts $4,255 $1,439 26,133

Total Impact of The Arizona Mining Industry Total impact Output Value Added Personal Income Employment Direct Impact 5,931 1,200 1,027 9,807 Indirect Impacts 4,255 2,389 1,439 26,133 Total Impacts $10,186 $3,589 $2,466 35,940 The total economic impact of the Arizona mining industry is the sum of direct and indirect impacts ($10.2 billion as measured by output). Mining operations ultimately created 35,940 total jobs in the Arizona economy with total personal income to workers of $2.5 billion. The total value added to Gross State Product was $3.6 billion. Value added is made up of worker and business income associated with the production of industry output. Total output is greater than total value added by the cost of intermediate inputs ($6.6 billion). The ratio of total impact to direct impact is a measure of the multiplier effect. For example, total output was 1.7 times greater than direct output. The employment multiplier for mining was fairly large, at 3.7. 13

Tax Impact of The Mining Industry Taxes Paid By State and Local Federal Total Mining Firms 152 214 366 Mining Workers 85 121 206 Supplier Firms 68 96 164 Supplier Workers 90 127 217 All Tax Impacts $395 $558 $953 As businesses buy supplies and produce output they pay state, local and federal taxes. Workers pay taxes on their earnings and consumer purchases. Businesses and workers pay property taxes, motor vehicle taxes, and various fees. Mining operators pay additional taxes based on the value of output. Total state and local tax revenues associated with the Arizona mining industry s economic activity summed to $395 million in 2017. Federal taxes paid by the mining industry were $558 million. 14

Mining Impacts in Arizona Counties County Direct Output Direct Employment 15 Total Output Total Employment Apache 0.0 0 0.0 0 Cochise 17.8 30 31.0 111 Coconino 36.2 61 63.0 225 Gila 647.9 1,086 1,129.0 4,030 Graham 304.7 511 531.0 1,896 Greenlee 2,030.9 3,405 3,538.9 12,633 La Paz 2.3 4 4.0 14 Maricopa 285.2 478 497.0 1,774 Mohave 80.3 135 140.0 500 Navajo 321.0 402 409.7 1,042 Pima 1,047.3 1,756 1,825.0 6,515 Pinal 647.3 1,085 1,128.0 4,027 Santa Cruz 0.0 0 0.0 0 Yavapai 510.1 854 889.0 3,173 Yuma 0.0 0 0.0 0 Total Impacts $5,931.0 9,807 $10,186 35,940 Direct output and employment in the accompanying table measure production and jobs within mining firms in each county. Total output and employment include all multiplier effects of indirect spending and employment supported by the presence of mining activity and sales in that county.

Economic Impact Study Methodology The study was undertaken to analyze and measure the economic impact of the Arizona mining industry on the state s economy. The economic contribution of the mining industry includes direct and indirect impacts. The direct impact of an industry equals the value of its output and employment, personal and business income created, and taxes and fees paid to governments. Indirect impacts occur as workers spend their incomes (induced effects), and as mining firms purchase materials and services from Arizona suppliers, who in turn purchase from their own suppliers and make payment to their employees. Indirect impacts were measured through application of an input-output model (IMPLAN) based on Arizona data. The IMPLAN model is regularly used in regional economic research for impact analysis. The model estimates multiplier effects from direct impacts and also has state-specific values for other useful variables such as output per worker, and the proportion of inputs each producer purchases locally. Statistics on 2017 direct employment for each mining sector in Arizona counties and the state were obtained from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, supplemented with EMSI estimates for nondisclosed data. Jobs were checked against county figures from the Mine Safety and Health Administration. 16

Economic Impact Study Methodology Continued Personal income consists of two components, worker compensation and proprietor (self employed) income. Compensation includes wages received by workers as well as employer paid social security, health insurance and other benefits as derived from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis and incorporated in the data for the IMPLAN model. Output is synonymous with the value of sales or shipments for each of the component sectors of the mining industry. Direct output for copper was based on U.S. Geological Survey reports for 2017. Output estimates for other producers (such as coal, gold, lead, zinc, and molybdenum) were derived through Arizona output coefficients in the IMPLAN model. Value added is a measure of the change in value at each stage of production, calculated as the value of output from that production stage minus the cost of intermediate inputs from suppliers. The basic components of value added for an industry are compensation paid out to workers and retained business income before taxes. Conceptually, firms at each stage of production add value when they buy inputs and then process these inputs for sale to the next stage of production at a new higher price sufficient to cover the costs of the initial inputs plus compensation to workers plus a return to the business enterprise. 17

Economic Impact Study Methodology Continued The sale price of products to final users such as consumers incorporates the combined valued added at each previous stage of production. At the national level, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is defined as the sum of value added by each industry, net of the cost of intermediate inputs. Similarly, the sum of the direct value added by the Arizona mining industry ($1.2 billion) is the industry s addition to the Arizona Gross State Product. Other state and local taxes were estimated by multiplying the income attributable to production by the statewide ratio of state and local taxes to income, a figure derived from the U. S. Census Bureau. This percentage was applied to personal income and income earned by producers of direct and indirect impacts to calculate revenue to state and local governments of $395 million. Government spending effects were removed from the inputoutput analysis and re-introduced to the model as a separate source of impact, resulting in an addition to output of $1.2 billion and 8,553 jobs created throughout the economy, due to government spending of tax revenues associated with economic activity of the Arizona mining industry. 18

Economic Impact Data Sources The following data sources were used in this study: 1. Arizona Department of Revenue, Phoenix, Arizona 2. EMSI http://www.economicmodeling.com/ 3. IMPLAN Group and IMPLAN System, Huntersville, N.C. 4. U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, D. C. 5. U.S Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. 6. U. S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 7. U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration, Denver, CO 19

Economic Impact of the Arizona Mining Industry Arizona Mining Association 916 W. Adams Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Prepared by L. William Seidman Research Institute W. P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University