Federal Fiscal Year 2011 Consumer Satisfaction with Vocational Rehabilitation Services. James A. Rothrock, M.S., L.P.C.

Similar documents
Federal Fiscal Year 2013 Consumer Satisfaction with Division of Rehabilitative Services (DRS)

2006 MEMBER SATISFACTION SURVEY

Customers experience of the Tax Credits Helpline

Medicaid and PeachCare for Kids Provider Survey: Customer Service Satisfaction Survey Spring Prepared for ACS

Consumer Satisfaction Survey Results

2007 Minnesota Department of Revenue Taxpayer Satisfaction with the Filing Process

Children s Disenrollment from MaineCare: A Survey of Disenrolled Families. Erika C. Ziller, M.S. Stephenie L. Loux, M.S. May 2003

Kansas Speaks 2012 Statewide Public Opinion Survey

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018

CHAPTER V. PRESENTATION OF RESULTS

Emergency Medical Services in Saskatchewan

Community Survey Results

CENTER FOR APPLIED RURAL INNOVATION

2018 Report. July 2018

Client Experience With Investment Call Centers 2011 Investment Call Center Satisfaction Survey

Quality of Life in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of Well-Being and Church Life: 2012 Nebraska Rural Poll Results: A Research Report

This document provides additional information on the survey, its respondents, and the variables

Well-Being in Non-Metropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of the Present and Views of the Future

Voluntary Long Term Disability Coverage Highlights

Evaluation of the 100,000 Homes Campaign in Chicago

GAO SSA DISABILITY DECISION MAKING. Additional Steps Needed to Ensure Accuracy and Fairness of Decisions at the Hearings Level

SUMMARY OF BORROWER SURVEY DATA

Experience and Satisfaction Levels of Long-Term Care Insurance Customers: A Study of Long-Term Care Insurance Claimants

High Incident Disability, 0.24 weight - Communication Disorders of Speech or Language;

THE PROFILE PROSPECTUS: AN ASSESSMENT BY MUTUAL FUND SHAREHOLDERS

Employment status and sight loss

City of San Rafael: 2011 City Satisfaction Survey Topline Report March 2011

PERCEPTIONS OF EXTREME WEATHER AND CLIMATE CHANGE IN VIRGINIA

Consumer Perceptions and Reactions to the CARD Act

NEBRASKA RURAL POLL. A Research Report. Optimism in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of Well-Being Nebraska Rural Poll Results

Do Work Benefits Affect Employee Morale?

What does it mean to you?

Quality of Life in Rural Nebraska: Trends and Changes

17 th Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey Influences of Gender on Retirement Readiness

THE CAQ S SEVENTH ANNUAL. Main Street Investor Survey

Agency 538 2/12/2015

ANNUAL REPORT Fiscal Year Minnesota Crime Victims Reparations Board

18 th Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey Influences of Household Income on Retirement Readiness. June 2018 TCRS

MONEY IN POLITICS JANUARY 2016

The American Dream Survey:

2005 Health Confidence Survey Wave VIII

Altarum Institute Survey of Consumer Health Care Opinions Fall 2014

GSI: Platinum Advantage vs. Unum s Income Series 750

GAO VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION

NEBRASKA RURAL POLL. A Research Report. Earning a Living in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska Nebraska Rural Poll Results

Group Voluntary Long Term Disability Insurance

Perceptions of Well-Being and Personal Finances Among Rural Nebraskans

Sixth Annual Nationwide TCHS Consumers Healthcare Survey: Stressed Out: Americans and Healthcare

Voluntary Short Term Disability and Voluntary Long Term Disability Insurance

AMERICA AT HOME SURVEY American Attitudes on Homeownership, the Home-Buying Process, and the Impact of Student Loan Debt

Legal Services in BC. Final Report. Nobody s Unpredictable. September 2009

The Relationship between Psychological Distress and Psychological Wellbeing

T H E S T A N D A R D L I F E I N S U R A N C E C O M P A N Y O F N E W Y O R K

Commissioned by: A National Survey

Still Waters Counseling, Consulting, and Psychological Services Initial Contact Information Sheet Testing

17 th Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey Influences of Educational Attainment on Retirement Readiness

HIGHLIGHTS OF COMMERCIAL BANKS CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY 1 (2018) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

WELLBEING SURVEY APRIL 2016 REPORT PREPARED BY NIELSEN FOR THE CANTERBURY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD AND PARTNERING AGENCIES

2008 Year-End Review. 3How can we expand access, given the funding environment?

S E P T E M B E R MassMutual Hispanic Middle America Financial Security Study

Grayson and Associates, P. C.

NEW JERSEY VOTERS SEE KEY CHRISTIE TRAITS IN LESS POSITIVE LIGHT

Group Voluntary Long Term Disability Insurance

Adult Intake Form. Counselee Name. Last First MI Male Female. Address: Street (or P.O. Box) Apt. # City State Zip Code

California Employer Health Benefits Survey

17 th Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey Influences of Generation on Retirement Readiness

Tell us about your recent mortgage experience

Governmental Accounting Standards Board

2016 Retirement Confidence Survey

Ten Important Facts About Roth IRAs JULY 2017

Office of Inspector General University of South Florida

2017 Paratransit Customer Satisfaction Study Access-A-Ride

Harris Interactive. ACEP Emergency Care Poll

Executive Summary: Evaluating Rehabilitation Services in Oklahoma: An Analysis of Program Impacts and of Benefits/Costs

17 th Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey Influences of Ethnicity on Retirement Readiness

T.W. Phillips Energy Help Fund Program Evaluation. Final Report

Long Term Disability Annual Report BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE BC PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCY YOUR ALLY for SUCCESS

GSI: Platinum Advantage vs. MassMutual s MaxElect

COMPARISON WITH 1997 NATIONAL SURVEY OF PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARD INSURANCE FRAUD 1

GSI: Platinum Advantage vs. Ameritas DInamic Foundation

Q. Which company delivers your electricity?

Expanded Long Term Disability Insurance

california C A LIFORNIA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION Health Care Almanac California Employer Health Benefits Survey

I. Study Background. A. Purpose of Study. B. General Methodology

An Examination of Sources Contacted During the SSBI

EMPLOYEE OUTLOOK. Winter EMPLOYEE VIEWS ON WORKING LIFE FOCUS. Employee attitudes to pay and pensions

Covered California 3/5/2019. Title 10. Investment. Chapter 12. California Health Benefit Exchange. Article 11. Certified Application Counselor Program

It doesn t have to be SCARY. Back to Work with SSDI. Tai Venuti, MPH. United Spinal Association Webinar Series Thursday, Oct.

Laclede Electric Cooperative Application For Employment

ASF Committer Diversity Survey

THE VALUE OF LABOR AND VALUING LABOR: The Effects of Employment on Personal Well-Being and Unions on Economic Well-Being

58 th Annual Business Outlook Survey

DVR counselor didn t even know what a farm is or what it takes to work on one.

Public Perceptions of Health Reform Legislation; Implementation Timeline, Costs, Impact and more

2017 AARP Foundation Taxpayer Satisfaction Survey Report

Standard Insurance Company Voluntary Disability Coverage Highlights FedAdvantage

2016 uk judicial attitude survey. Report of findings covering salaried judges in England & Wales Courts and UK Tribunals

Medicaid and PeachCare for Kids Member Survey: Customer Service Satisfaction. Fall Prepared for ACS. By the Georgia Health Policy Center

311 Call Centre Satisfaction Study

The Report of Transnational Survey Concerning on Expectations and Visions of Elderly Care Among People Ranging in Age from 50 to 59 Years

Transcription:

ederal iscal ear 2011 Consumer Satisfaction with Vocational Rehabilitation Services James A. Rothrock, M.S., L.P.C. Commissioner July 2012

Policy and Planning Division Mission/Value Statement: Policy and Planning staff serve as an agency resource by providing research, evaluation, analysis, and communication of information to provide effective planning and decision making. We value excellence in our work through accuracy, integrity, collaboration, timeliness, clarity and accessibility. Policy and Planning Director: Elizabeth E. Smith, J.D., M.S. We welcome your comments and questions. Please contact: The Report Staff or the Policy and Planning Director Virginia Department for Aging and Rehabilitative Services 8004 ranklin arms Drive Richmond, Virginia 23229 Voice: (804) 662-7071 Voice Toll ree: (800) 552-5019 TT: (804) 662-9040 TT Toll ree: (800) 464-9950 ax: (804) 662-7696 Policy and Planning Web address: http://intranet/drs1/frs/policyplanning/default.htm Report Staff Mable L. leming, B.S., Senior Analyst Research and Evaluation lead analyst for this report, management and oversight of administration activities, data verification Matthew C. Doum, B.A., Research Analyst logistics of administration and special analyses related to survey administration (costs, response rates, completions), assistance with analyses Jennifer P. Woodward, Administrative Staff Assistant survey packaging and mailing, data entry, and success stories Recommended Citation: leming, M.L., Doum, M.D., and Woodward, J.P. (2012). ederal iscal ear 2011 Consumer Satisfaction with Vocational Rehabilitation Services Acknowledgments The report staff gratefully acknowledges assistance received from Information Services Staff, specifically Ann Stanfield, Systems Analyst and Daniel Ross, Manager, Web Operations. Additionally, we thank vocational rehabilitation counselors for guiding many Virginians with disabilities along the path to employment. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 2 of 38

Table of Contents Executive Summary... 4 Section I: 2011 Survey Results and ederal iscal ear Trends... 7 Introduction... 8 Survey Administration Summary... 8 Summary of Results... 11 Section II: Survey Results for outh in Transition from School to Work, Hearing Impaired, and Specialty Caseloads... 14 outh in Transition from School to Work... 15 Consumers with Hearing Impairments... 19 Consumers Served by Specialty Caseload VR Counselors... 23 Appendix A: 2011 Survey Results by Closure Status... 27 Appendix B: Comparison of Satisfaction Ratings by Self and Proxy Respondents... 33 Appendix C: 2011 Survey Questionnaire... 35 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 3 of 38

Executive Summary Through its vocational rehabilitation program, the Virginia Department for Aging and Rehabilitative Services (DARS) helps people with disabilities prepare for, find, and keep a job. To this end, the agency recognizes the importance of consumer input to improve processes, services and results. Each year, DARS conducts a consumer satisfaction survey among consumers who received services and were either employed at the time of case closure (Status 26) or not employed (Status 28). Key findings from 2011 are provided below. Overall satisfaction with DARS was 77 percent and five percentage points below the agency target of 82 percent. Ninety percent of consumers who closed with an employment outcome were satisfied overall with DARS. Overall satisfaction with DARS was at an all-time low for consumers who closed without an employment outcome. Job satisfaction was 83 percent for consumers who were competitively employed and earning at or above minimum wage. Overall satisfaction was at or above 78 percent for consumers with special needs who were served by special caseload counselors. The special caseloads address specific needs of consumers who are youth in transition, deaf and hard of hearing, dealing with substance abuse or dealing with a serious mental illness. Working Together, Employed and Satisfied Consumers who are successfully employed have consistent satisfaction from year to year and those who are very satisfied with their involvement in developing the VR plan speak positively of the help, the counselors, or the service they receive from counselors and staff. In 2011, satisfaction percentages were at or above 90 percent for nine of the fourteen survey items. Satisfaction with involvement in developing the VR plan and the time it took were 86 percent and 83 percent, respectively. Overall satisfaction was 90 percent (n=250). Among those who were competitively employed and earning at or above minimum wage, 86 percent (n=223) self-reported they were working or being paid for a job. Job satisfaction for these consumers was 83 percent (n=181) and two percentage points above the prior eight-year average. Sixty-eight percent (n=123) expected to be in the job a year later. A Success Story Independent of the survey process, DARS counselors and managers routinely submit consumer success stories. These stories provide another view of consumer outcomes. A summary of one 2011 success story linked to a consumer respondent is provided below. The consumer was referred to DARS and had been diagnosed with traumatic brain injury that led to loss of range of motion, motor skills, and dexterity on the left side of his body. Additionally, the consumer had several criminal convictions. Through 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 4 of 38

customer focused service with DARS, the consumer was able to continue with postsecondary education and advance from a job paying $143.00 per week to one paying $461.35 per week. The consumer was working full time and receiving full state benefits at the time of closure. Expenditures for the life of the case totaled $13,876.13 and the length of time from application to closure was 6.6 years. The consumer self-reported in the survey (3.7 months after closure) that he was working in the same position and hoping for the next level up. Additionally, the consumer reported I was most satisfied with the service, respect, and attention and attendance to my plan of action. Agency Satisfaction (All Consumers Served) While the 2011 overall satisfaction for the agency was 77 percent (n=356), indications of a good VR experience were evident in consumers who reported they were treated well by DARS staff (90 percent, n=405), would refer a friend (83 percent, n=375), and would come back to DARS again (81 percent, n=370). Highlights for 2011 (employed and not employed combined) are provided below. Detailed survey results and trends are discussed in Section I. Survey results for youth in transition from school to work and special caseloads are provided in Section II. Over 80 percent of consumers agreed their counselor took their case seriously (82 percent, n=372), did not rush them (85 percent, n=383), and explained services available to them (85 percent, n=383). The 82 percent was five percentage points below the prior eight-year average for counselors taking the case seriously. Less than 80 percent of consumers agreed their counselor knew about programs in the community that could help them (78 percent, n=350). Seventy-nine percent (n=355) agreed their counselor met timetables related to their VR program. Satisfaction with involvement in developing the VR plan and the time it takes were 73 percent (n=332) and 71 percent (n=323), respectively. Satisfaction with the time it takes to develop the VR plan has been on a gradual decline since 2008. This trend is strong among consumers who were not employed at closure. Special Caseloads DARS continues to work with youth and families to provide support in transitioning from school to work as well as recognizing the unique needs of consumers who are deaf and hard of hearing, dealing with substance abuse, or dealing with a serious mental illness. To this end, DARS has counselors in place who specialize in serving consumers with these special needs. While small in number, overall satisfaction was at or above 78 percent for consumers with special needs who were served by a special caseload. Detailed survey results are provided in Section II of this report. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 5 of 38

Learning from Those Who Are Not Employed Historically, consumers who are served and not employed at closure are not as satisfied as those who are employed at closure. Consumers who are very dissatisfied with their involvement in developing the VR plan speak of counselor issues, lack of help, or service issues. In 2011, 28 consumers were very dissatisfied with their involvement (8 closed less than a year from application and 20 closed a year or more after application). Delayed status was not mentioned as an issue. While 16 consumers voiced their perception of the experience (not much help, waste of time, did not meet my needs), 12 consumers provided input related to specific areas. Nine consumers who had been in the system for a year or more described perceptions that suggested a lack of understanding regarding why requests were not possible (perception of denial versus counselor s guidance or adherence to policy), the roles of various individuals who assisted with their case (perception of being passed around or discontinuity), and the expectation of a counselor s responsibility in communicating information. Perceptions for three individuals who were in the system for less than a year were related to counselors [no one assigned to case when counselor was out, counselor needs to be more understanding of consumer s needs and time, calls were never returned (consumer was still waiting for someone to get back with him/her)]. Impact on Overall Agency Satisfaction In 2011, overall satisfaction for consumers who were not employed at closure was at an all-time low of 58 percent (n=106). Satisfaction with involvement in developing the VR plan was 55 percent (n=98) and satisfaction with the time it took was 52 percent (n=93). It is believed that the all-time low for involvement was the combined result of a continuous increase (since 2008) of consumers who were very dissatisfied with their involvement and an unexpected increase for two other response categories (dissatisfied and neither). Since satisfaction related to three core areas in the VR program (overall satisfaction, involvement in developing the VR plan, and the time it takes to develop the plan) have similar downward trends, it is believed that the aforementioned phenomenon played a part in the lowest overall agency satisfaction (77 percent) in the past nine years. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 6 of 38

Section I: 2011 Survey Results and ederal iscal ear Trends 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 7 of 38

Introduction The State Rehabilitation Council works in partnership with DARS to measure consumer satisfaction with vocational rehabilitation (VR) services. In Virginia, the survey of consumer satisfaction is administered annually by the DARS Policy and Planning Division under SRC guidance. 1 The survey provides a systematic method of hearing the point of view of DARS consumers. It is one measure of program effectiveness and a quality of service indicator. In the survey, consumers are able to provide their level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with received services, VR staff, and various aspects of the VR process. Consumers are welcomed to express openly and freely their opinion of VR services. Data for the 2011 (October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011) survey were captured for consumers who were employed at closure (Status 26) or who received VR services and were not employed at closure (Status 28). This report contains the results of the 2011 survey and satisfaction trends. Additionally, the report covers survey results for consumers served under special caseloads. Survey Administration Summary Methodology The standard method of evaluating satisfaction with VR services involves a stratified sample according to closure status. Thus, more cases are selected from Status 28 than Status 26 consumers. Deliberate over sampling of Status 28 consumers is performed because these consumers are less likely to respond to the survey. Additionally, over sampling this group helps to reduce the potential favorable response bias from Status 26 consumers. 2 A survey was mailed to each consumer in the sample along with a business reply envelope. Reminders and follow-up survey packets were used to encourage consumers to complete and return the survey. Over the course of 2011, a survey was mailed to 1,810 consumers (45% were Status 26 and 55% were Status 28). Response Rate The overall response rate for 2011 was 41 percent (n=537) and only three percentage points below the rate for 2010. The response rates for Status 26 and Status 28 consumers were 48% (n=312) and 34% (n=225), respectively. Of the 537 respondents, 464 were consumer self-respondents (278 Status 26 and 186 Status 28 consumers). 3 The number of survey completions for Status 26 ad Status 28 consumers was similar to 2010. 1 ederal regulations governing State VR programs mandate that the State Rehabilitation Council (SRC) assess consumer satisfaction to the extent feasible (34 CR, 361.17(h)(4)). 2 The CSSSSTEM Consumer Satisfaction with DRS Backgrounder, Management Decisions and Technical Considerations for the Survey of Consumer Satisfaction with VR, October 1995 (Revised 2/96, 9/99). 3 Consumer self-respondents include cases where the consumer completed the survey on their own or with help. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 8 of 38

Of the remaining 73 respondents, 70 percent were proxies (completed the survey based on their knowledge of the consumer, n=51) and 30% were unidentifiable (did not disclose who completed the survey, n=22). Survey results for consumer self-respondents are included in this report. Appendix A includes survey results by closure status and Appendix B includes results for proxies. Demographic Composition The fundamental goal of survey research is to collect information about the people in the survey that is representative of the population that the survey sample was drawn from. The demographic composition of the 2011 survey sample was similar to the overall demographics of the 2011 VR population and it is believed that the sample is representative of the population from which it was drawn. Although there does not appear to be an overall survey non-response bias, there is a lower percentage of transition consumers and younger consumers (age 22 or less) responding to the survey. Demographic (%) Comparison of 2011 Population, Survey Sample and Survey Respondents 4 Population 5 Survey Sample Self-Respondents Status 26 Status 28 Status 26 Status 28 Status 26 Status 28 N=3,930 N=3,725 N=815 N=995 N=278 N=186 % % % % % % Gender Male 58 53 59 52 55 47 emale 42 47 41 48 45 53 Race African American 33 40 34 40 36 34 Caucasian 61 55 61 56 60 62 Age at closure Other 5 5 5 4 4 3 22 or less 25 31 26 32 18 16 23-34 28 26 28 26 24 18 35-49 27 24 27 23 28 30 50-64 18 17 17 18 26 33 65+ 1 1 1 1 3 3 Not transition 63 56 63 57 73 76 RSA Transition 6 Transition 37 44 37 43 27 24 MSD 72 81 71 79 65 83 Significance of Disability SD - 2 18 14 17 15 18 12 SD - 1 9 5 11 5 15 5 4 Columns represent percentages and may not total 100% due to rounding. Percentages were rounded using the Microsoft Excel formula for percentages. 5 2011 information is based on AWARE closure dates as of September 30, 2011. Two consumers (Case_Master_ID 438518 and 52613) were excluded from the analysis since the consumers were reopened during the survey period and were no longer 2011 closures. 6 RSA transition cases were identified based on RSA definition for transition: age at application from 14 to 24 years. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 9 of 38

Population 5 Survey Sample Self-Respondents Status 26 Status 28 Status 26 Status 28 Status 26 Status 28 N=3,930 N=3,725 N=815 N=995 N=278 N=186 % % % % % % NSD 1 1 1 1 1 1 Blindness/other visual impairment 1 1 1 0 1 1 Deafness/hearing impairment 7 3 8 3 11 3 Impairment Category 7 Communication impairmentexpressive/receptive 1 1 1 0 1 1 Orthopedic impairment 8 9 8 9 9 12 Respiratory or physical debilitation or other physical 9 8 8 9 14 16 Cognitive or other mental impairments 45 46 44 48 36 39 RS Region Psychosocial Impairments 29 32 31 31 27 28 Northern 37 30 38 29 38 28 Central 23 32 23 33 24 36 Eastern 17 18 19 17 20 18 Southwest 22 19 20 20 17 18 7 Impairment categories are based on the primary impairment as recorded in AWARE. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 10 of 38

Summary of Results In 2011, 3,930 consumers were served and employed for at least 90 days at the time of case closure. This represents a 16 percent increase from 2010. The 2011 rehabilitation rate was 51 percent. 8 rom a random sample of 815 consumers who were employed at case closure, 278 completed this year s survey along with 186 consumers who received services but were not employed at case closure. 2011 survey results and federal fiscal year trends (igures 1a-e) are reported in this section. Results by closure status are provided at Appendix A. Satisfaction Overall satisfaction was 77 percent (n=356) and five percentage points below the agency target of 82 percent. Satisfaction with involvement in developing the VR plan and the time it takes were 73 percent (n=332) and 71 percent (n=323), respectively. Satisfaction with the time it takes to develop the VR plan has been on a gradual decline since 2008. Counselor-Consumer Relationship Assessing satisfaction with various aspects of the VR process helps to indentify strength and weaknesses in our VR program. Learning from the prior eight years suggest that counselors are strong in the initial phases of VR (explaining services, not rushing the consumer, taking the case serious) and not as strong in service delivery (meeting discussed timetables and knowing about programs in the community that could help consumers). These trends were evident in 2011. Satisfaction with counselors dipped slightly from 2010. After a fairly consistent run above 85 percent for the past three years, the percentage of consumers agreeing that their counselor took the case seriously dropped to 82 percent (n=372). Eighty-five percent of consumers agreed their counselor did not rush them (n=383) and 85 percent agreed that their counselor explained clearly the services that were available to them (n=383). Relative to how counselors treated consumers, fewer consumers agreed their counselors met discussed timetables (79%, n=355) and knew about programs that could help them (78%, n=350). Information and Services Close to 80% of consumers in 2011 agreed they got the information they needed (79%, n=356), received the services they needed (75%, n=338), or benefited from the services they received (74%, n=334). All were slightly below prior eight-year averages. 8 The 2011 rehabilitation rate and closure information is based on AWARE closure dates as of September 30, 2011. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 11 of 38

Quality of Service Consumers continue to have a fairly strong belief that people at DARS treat them well (90%, n=405). The percentage of consumers willing to tell a friend to go to DARS was 83% (n=375). Sixty-three percent (n=289) indicated they would definitely come back to DARS if they need additional help and another 18 percent (n=81) were not definite but thought they would come back. Satisfaction Trends for VR Survey Measures (Refer to Appendix C for Questionnaire) igure 1a. Satisfaction with DARS, Involvement in Developing the VR Plan and the Time it Takes igure 1b: Agreement with Statements Regarding VR Counselors 80% 80% 60% 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 DARS 81% 83% 81% 82% 80% 81% 81% 80% 77% Involvement 75% 78% 77% 75% 75% 78% 75% 75% 73% Time 76% 77% 75% 76% 73% 76% 74% 73% 71% 60% 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 Not rushed 84% 87% 87% 85% 85% 86% 87% 86% 85% Explained 88% 88% 87% 87% 87% 88% 86% 89% 85% Serious 86% 89% 88% 88% 85% 87% 87% 88% 82% Timetable 80% 81% 81% 82% 81% 81% 82% 83% 79% Knowledge 80% 79% 80% 82% 79% 80% 78% 81% 78% igure 1c: Agreement with Statements Regarding the Information and Services igure 1d: Agreement with Statements Related to Quality of Service 80% 80% 60% 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 Information 80% 82% 81% 81% 80% 80% 81% 81% 79% Received 78% 81% 79% 80% 79% 80% 79% 80% 75% Benefited 78% 81% 80% 79% 78% 80% 77% 79% 74% 60% 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 Treated 91% 92% 93% 90% 89% 91% 90% 91% 90% Refer friend 85% 87% 86% 85% 82% 85% 84% 85% 83% Come back 82% 85% 83% 83% 79% 83% 83% 84% 81% 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 12 of 38

Job Satisfaction for Rehabilitated Consumers Among consumers who were competitively employed and earning at or above minimum wage, 86% (n=223) 9 said they were earning wages or being paid for a job. Job satisfaction among these consumers was 83% (n=181) and two percentage points above the prior eightyear average. Sixty-eight percent (n=123) of consumers indicated they expected to be in the job a year later. This percentage was similar to the prior eight-year average of 68%. igure 1e: Self-reported Earning Wage at Time of Survey and Satisfaction with Current Job 95% 85% 75% 65% 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 Earning wage 86% 87% 89% 90% 91% 89% 88% 90% 86% Job 79% 84% 79% 80% 84% 79% 80% 80% 83% Problems Encountered Consistent with the past two years, seven percent (n=33) of consumers indicated they had encountered problems or inconveniences related to their disability and 88% (n=398) indicated they did not encounter any problems or inconveniences. Of the 33 consumers who indicated they encountered problems, only four reported problems that were related to a disability. The problems included: 1. A consumer who indicated that job training class at 10:00 a.m. was too early for individuals with disabilities since some have personal care attendants who come at 9:00 am and are not able to get there by 10:00 a.m. 2. A problem with elevators being out for a consumer who used a scooter. 3. More research needed for CAPD and training to deal with it in order to prevent future inconveniences and misdiagnoses and/or assumptions. 10 4. Counselor never offered any help or suggestion for consumer s Asperger s Disorder. 9 or this report, competitive employment is employment in an integrated setting with or without supports or selfemployment that is performed on a full-time or part-time basis for which an individual is compensated. Please note that respondents self-reported whether or not they were earning wages. 10 The assumption for this report is that the consumer was speaking of Central Auditory Processing Disorders 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 13 of 38

Section II: Survey Results for outh in Transition from School to Work, Hearing Impaired, and Specialty Caseloads 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 14 of 38

outh in Transition from School to Work 11 DARS continues to work with youth and families to provide support in transitioning from school to work. Transition students may be served by counselors who are: 1) dedicated transition school counselors, 2) counselors with a general and transition caseload (at least one school area), or 3) counselors with primarily general vocational rehabilitation (VR) caseloads. or ease of discussion, the three categories will be referred to as dedicated transition, mixed, and general. In 2011, 25 percent (n=118) of consumer respondents were transition-age youth at application. Thirty-nine percent of these youth were served by counselors with dedicated transition caseloads (n=46), 36 percent were served by counselors with mixed caseloads (n=42), and 25 percent were served by counselors with general caseloads (n=30). Satisfaction highlights are provided below. Consumer Satisfaction Summary Satisfaction was low on most survey items relative to prior eight-year averages ( 2003-2010). This was consistent with the trend for the agency. Job satisfaction for transition consumers who were competitively employed and earning at or above minimum wage was slightly above that of the agency. Eighty-six percent (n=59) of transition students who were competitively employed and earning at or above minimum wage reported they were working at the time of the survey. 12 Job satisfaction for 2011 was 86 percent (n=50). Overall satisfaction was 75 percent (n=88). Additionally, 73 percent (n=84) of the students were satisfied with their involvement in the process and 68 percent (n=79) were satisfied with the time it took to develop their VR plan. Over 80 percent of youth in transition agreed their counselor took their case seriously (81%, n=96), explained clearly the services available to them (83%, n=98), and did not rush them (85%, n=98). Close to 80 percent agreed their counselor knew about programs that could help them (78%, n=91) and met discussed timetables for their VR program (77%, n=90). While 2011 satisfaction was down for transition as a whole, satisfaction for transition consumers served by counselors with general caseloads was generally at or above the prior eightyear average ( 2003-2010). Satisfaction for consumers served by dedicated transition counselors or counselors with mixed caseloads was generally at or below the prior eight-year average. 11 or this survey year, transition is based on RSA definition of age 14 to 24 years old at application. 12 or this report, competitive employment is employment in an integrated setting with or without supports or self-employment that is performed on a full-time or part-time basis for which an individual is compensated. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 15 of 38

Satisfaction for outh in Transition from School to Work 13 Satisfaction for outh in Transition by Counselor s Caseload Type Dedicated Primarily Transition Transition/ General (n=46) General (n=42) (n=30) 14 Satisfaction for Transition and Non-Transition Cases Not Transition Transition (n=118) 15 (n=346) N % N % N % N % N % Satisfied 36 78 29 69 23 77 88 75 268 78 Overall satisfaction with DARS Degree of satisfaction with your involvement in developing your Vocational Rehabilitation Plan our general satisfaction with the time it took to develop your Rehabilitation Plan Did you encounter any problems or inconveniences with DARS? All of the people at DARS treated me well. If a friend of mine were in a similar situation to mine, I would tell them to go to DARS. I always got the information I needed Neither 4 9 3 7 1 3 8 7 16 5 Dissatisfied 4 9 10 24 3 10 17 14 54 16 Don't know 2 4 0 0 3 10 5 4 4 1 Satisfied 36 78 27 66 21 75 84 73 248 74 Neither 6 13 2 5 2 7 10 9 27 8 Dissatisfied 3 7 11 27 3 11 17 15 51 15 Don't know 1 2 1 2 2 7 4 3 11 3 Satisfied 29 63 27 66 23 77 79 68 244 72 Neither 7 15 7 17 1 3 15 13 31 9 Dissatisfied 6 13 7 17 4 13 17 15 53 16 Don't know 4 9 0 0 2 7 6 5 12 4 Don't know 4 9 0 0 0 0 4 3 7 2 Rather not say 2 4 0 0 1 3 3 3 6 2 No 36 78 38 90 28 97 102 87 296 89 es 4 9 4 10 0 0 8 7 25 7 Agree 42 91 37 90 28 93 107 91 298 89 Neither 2 4 1 2 0 0 3 3 7 2 Disagree 1 2 2 5 1 3 4 3 28 8 Don't know 1 2 1 2 1 3 3 3 2 1 Agree 36 78 28 67 25 83 89 75 286 85 Neither 1 2 2 5 1 3 4 3 8 2 Disagree 4 9 10 24 3 10 17 14 35 10 Don't know 5 11 2 5 1 3 8 7 6 2 Agree 38 83 30 73 24 83 92 79 264 79 Neither 4 9 2 5 3 10 9 8 19 6 13 Percentage rounding in discussion text is based on Microsoft Excel formula for rounding percentage. 14 General includes primarily non specialized caseloads. 15 or this survey year, transition is based on RSA definition of age 14 to 24 years old at application. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 16 of 38

Satisfaction for outh in Transition by Counselor s Caseload Type Dedicated Primarily Transition Transition/ General (n=46) General (n=42) (n=30) 14 Satisfaction for Transition and Non-Transition Cases Not Transition Transition (n=118) 15 (n=346) N % N % N % N % N % from DARS. Disagree 4 9 9 22 2 7 15 13 46 14 My counselor took my case seriously. My counselor clearly explained services available to me. My counselor knew about programs in my community that could help me I never felt my counselor was rushing me when we met or spoke about my case. My counselor always met the timetables we discussed for my vocational rehabilitation program. I received services that I needed. I benefited from services that I received. Don't know 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 Agree 39 85 33 79 24 80 96 81 276 83 Neither 1 2 2 5 0 0 3 3 12 4 Disagree 3 7 5 12 5 17 13 11 42 13 Don't know 3 7 2 5 1 3 6 5 3 1 Agree 41 89 32 76 25 83 98 83 285 85 Neither 2 4 1 2 1 3 4 3 7 2 Disagree 2 4 7 17 3 10 12 10 37 11 Don't know 1 2 2 5 1 3 4 3 6 2 Agree 40 87 29 71 22 73 91 78 259 78 Neither 2 4 2 5 4 13 8 7 11 3 Disagree 3 7 8 20 3 10 14 12 39 12 Don't know 1 2 2 5 1 3 4 3 24 7 Agree 39 87 34 83 25 86 98 85 285 85 Neither 0 0 2 5 1 3 3 3 11 3 Disagree 3 7 3 7 1 3 7 6 34 10 Don't know 3 7 2 5 2 7 7 6 4 1 Agree 35 76 31 76 24 80 90 77 265 79 Neither 3 7 2 5 0 0 5 4 15 4 Disagree 5 11 5 12 4 13 14 12 40 12 Don't know 3 7 3 7 2 7 8 7 15 4 Agree 35 76 28 70 23 77 86 74 252 75 Neither 1 2 2 5 1 3 4 3 17 5 Disagree 7 15 9 23 4 13 20 17 57 17 Don't know 3 7 1 3 2 7 6 5 9 3 Agree 33 73 30 73 24 80 87 75 247 74 Neither 2 4 1 2 2 7 5 4 23 7 Disagree 8 18 9 22 2 7 19 16 54 16 Don't know 2 4 1 2 2 7 5 4 10 3 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 17 of 38

If you were to seek help again, would you come back to DARS? Are you currently earning wages or being paid for a job? 16 Overall satisfaction with your current job?(of those earning wage) Do you expect to be in this same job a year from now? (consumers satisfied with job) Satisfaction for outh in Transition by Counselor s Caseload Type Dedicated Primarily Transition Transition/ General (n=46) General (n=42) (n=30) 14 Satisfaction for Transition and Non-Transition Cases Not Transition Transition (n=118) 15 (n=346) N % N % N % N % N % es, definitely 30 65 20 49 19 63 69 59 220 65 es, I think so 6 13 11 27 7 23 24 21 57 17 No, I do not 2 4 3 7 0 0 5 4 19 6 think so No, definitely 4 9 5 12 2 7 11 9 18 5 not Don't know 4 9 2 5 2 7 8 7 26 8 es 26 90 21 81 12 86 59 86 164 87 No 3 10 5 19 2 14 10 14 25 13 Satisfied 23 92 16 76 11 92 50 86 131 81 Neither 0 0 2 10 1 8 3 5 14 9 Dissatisfied 2 8 3 14 0 0 5 9 15 9 Don't know 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 es 13 57 9 56 5 45 27 54 96 74 No 2 9 3 19 0 0 5 10 10 8 Don t know 8 35 4 25 6 55 18 36 24 18 16 Job satisfaction includes only consumers who were competitively employed earning at or above minimum wage and self reported in the survey that they were earning wages or being paid for a job. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 18 of 38

Consumers with Hearing Impairments 17 DARS recognizes the unique needs of consumers who are deaf or hard of hearing. Consumers seeking vocational rehabilitation (VR) services may be served by Rehabilitation Counselors for the Deaf (RCDs) or other DARS specialist/general counselors. In 2011, nine percent (n=41) of consumer respondents had hearing impairments; 51percent (n=21) were served by RCDs and 49 percent (n=20) were served by non-rcds. Satisfaction highlights are provided below. Consumer Satisfaction Summary While small in numbers, consumers with hearing impairments reported strong satisfaction for the VR program and their counselors in 2011. Unlike the agency as a whole, consumers with hearing impairments reported strong agreement regarding their counselors meeting discussed timetables for their VR program and knowing about programs in the community that could help them. Eighty-six percent (n=24) of consumers who were competitively employed and earning at or above minimum wage reported they were working at the time of the survey. 18 Job satisfaction for 2011 was 92 percent (n=22). Overall satisfaction was 80 percent (n=33). Additionally, 75 percent (n=30) were satisfied with their involvement in the process and 78 percent (n=32) were satisfied with the time it took to develop their VR plan. Consumer perception of counselors was strong with 85 percent or higher agreeing their counselor took their case seriously (88%, n=35), explained clearly the services available to them (95%, n=38), knew about programs in the community that could help them (88%, n=35), did not rush them (87%, n=34), and met discussed timetables for their VR program (85%, n=34). 2011 satisfaction was at or above the prior eight-year average ( 2003-2010) on almost all survey measures. This trend was evident for consumers who were served by RCDs and evident to some extent for consumers served by non-rcds. 17 or this survey year, hearing impaired is based on all impairments in AWARE including those beyond primary and secondary impairments. 18 or this report, competitive employment is employment in an integrated setting with or without supports or self-employment that is performed on a full-time or part-time basis for which an individual is compensated. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 19 of 38

Overall satisfaction with DARS Degree of satisfaction with your involvement in developing your Vocational Rehabilitation Plan our general satisfaction with the time it took to develop your Rehabilitation Plan Did you encounter any problems or inconveniences with DARS? All of the people at DARS treated me well. If a friend of mine were in a similar situation to mine, I would tell them to go to DARS. I always got the information I needed from DARS. My counselor took my case seriously. Satisfaction Ratings for Consumers with Hearing Impairments Overall Hearing Impaired Consumers with Other Impairments (N=423) Not Served by Served by RCD (N=21) RCD (N=20) (N=41) N % N % N % N % Satisfied 17 81 16 80 33 80 323 77 Neither 3 14 1 5 4 10 20 5 Dissatisfied 1 5 3 15 4 10 67 16 Don t know 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 Satisfied 15 75 15 75 30 75 302 73 Neither 3 15 1 5 4 10 33 8 Dissatisfied 2 10 3 15 5 13 63 15 Don t know 0 0 1 5 1 3 14 3 Satisfied 19 90 13 65 32 78 291 70 Neither 0 0 3 15 3 7 43 10 Dissatisfied 2 10 2 10 4 10 66 16 Don t know 0 0 2 10 2 5 16 4 Don't know 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 3 Rather not say 0 0 1 5 1 2 8 2 No 20 95 18 90 38 93 360 88 es 1 5 1 5 2 5 31 8 Agree 19 90 19 95 38 93 367 89 Neither 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 2 Disagree 2 10 0 0 2 5 30 7 Don t know 0 0 1 5 1 2 4 1 Agree 19 90 18 90 37 90 338 82 Neither 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 3 Disagree 2 10 1 5 3 7 49 12 Don t know 0 0 1 5 1 2 13 3 Agree 18 86 17 85 35 85 321 78 Neither 1 5 2 10 3 7 25 6 Disagree 2 10 0 0 2 5 59 14 Don t know 0 0 1 5 1 2 5 1 Agree 16 80 19 95 35 88 337 82 Neither 1 5 0 0 1 3 14 3 Disagree 3 15 1 5 4 10 51 12 Don t know 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 My counselor clearly explained Agree 18 90 20 100 38 95 345 84 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 20 of 38

Not Served by RCD (N=20) Overall Hearing Impaired (N=41) Consumers with Other Impairments (N=423) Served by RCD (N=21) N % N % N % N % services available to me. Neither 1 5 0 0 1 3 10 2 My counselor knew about programs in my community that could help me. I never felt my counselor was rushing me when we met or spoke about my case. My counselor always met the timetables we discussed for my vocational rehabilitation program. I received services that I needed. I benefited from services that I received. If you were to seek help again, would you come back to DARS? Are you currently earning wages or being paid for a job? (Status 26 and competitive employment status) 19 Disagree 1 5 0 0 1 3 48 12 Don t know 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 2 Agree 16 80 19 95 35 88 315 77 Neither 2 10 1 5 3 8 16 4 Disagree 1 5 0 0 1 3 52 13 Don t know 1 5 0 0 1 3 27 7 Agree 17 89 17 85 34 87 349 85 Neither 0 0 1 5 1 3 13 3 Disagree 2 11 1 5 3 8 38 9 Don t know 0 0 1 5 1 3 10 2 Agree 18 90 16 80 34 85 321 78 Neither 0 0 1 5 1 3 19 5 Disagree 1 5 3 15 4 10 50 12 Don t know 1 5 0 0 1 3 22 5 Agree 15 75 16 80 31 78 307 75 Neither 3 15 3 15 6 15 15 4 Disagree 2 10 1 5 3 8 74 18 Don t know 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 4 Agree 17 85 17 85 34 85 300 73 Neither 2 10 1 5 3 8 25 6 Disagree 1 5 2 10 3 8 70 17 Don t know 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 4 es, definitely 14 67 15 75 29 71 260 63 es, I think so 6 29 1 5 7 17 74 18 No, I do not think so 1 5 0 0 1 2 23 6 No, definitely not 0 0 1 5 1 2 28 7 Don t know 0 0 3 15 3 7 31 7 es 11 85 13 87 24 86 199 87 No 2 15 2 13 4 14 31 13 19 Survey items related to job satisfaction include only those consumers who were successfully rehabilitated and self reported that they were earning wages or being paid for a job. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 21 of 38

Overall satisfaction with your current job?(of those earning wage) Do you expect to be in this same job a year from now? (consumers satisfied with job) Overall Hearing Impaired Consumers with Other Impairments (N=423) Not Served by Served by RCD (N=21) RCD (N=20) (N=41) N % N % N % N % Satisfied 9 82 13 100 22 92 159 82 Neither 2 18 0 0 2 8 15 8 Dissatisfied 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 10 Don t know 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 es 6 67 10 77 16 73 107 68 No 1 11 0 0 1 5 14 9 Don't know 2 22 3 23 5 23 37 23 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 22 of 38

Consumers Served by Specialty Caseload VR Counselors 20 DARS recognizes the unique needs of youth in transition from school to work as well as consumers who are deaf and hard of hearing, dealing with substance abuse, or dealing with a serious mental illness. In 2011, 29% (n=133) of consumer respondents were served under a special caseloads. Ten percent (n=46) were served by dedicated transition counselors Eight percent (n=37) were served by counselors who specialize in substance abuse (SA) cases ive percent (n=23) were served by counselors who specialize in long term mental illness (SMI) cases. ive percent (n=21) were served by Rehabilitation Counselors for the Deaf (RCDs) Only one percent (n=6) of consumer respondents were served under Temporary Assistance for Needy amilies (TAN). Satisfaction for this group is not discussed in this report. Satisfaction highlights for special caseloads are provided below. Consumer Satisfaction Summary In general, consumer perception of their current job and DARS overall was good. Eighty percent or higher agreed their counselor knew about programs that could help them. Dedicated Transition: Ninety two percent (n=23) of consumers who were competitively employed and earning at or above minimum wage were satisfied with their current job. 21 Overall satisfaction was 78 percent (n=36). RCD: Eighty-two percent (n=9) of consumers who were competitively employed and earning at or above minimum wage were satisfied with their current job. Overall satisfaction was 81 percent (n=17). SA: Seventy-one percent (n=12) of consumers who were competitively employed and earning at or above minimum wage were satisfied with their current job. Overall satisfaction was 81 percent (n=30). SMI: Seventy percent (n=7) of consumers who were competitively employed and earning at or above minimum wage were satisfied with their current job. Overall satisfaction was 78 percent (n=18). 20 or this survey year, transition is age 14 to 24 years old at application and served by a dedicated transition counselor; RCD represents consumers with hearing impairments and served by a RCD; SA represents consumers who are SA clients and were served under SA caseloads; and SMI represents consumers with mental impairments. 21 or this report, competitive employment is employment in an integrated setting with or without supports or self-employment that is performed on a full-time or part-time basis for which an individual is compensated. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 23 of 38

Satisfaction Ratings for Consumers Served by Specialty Caseload Counselors VR (N=331) Dedicated Transition (N=46) RCD (N=21) SA (N=37) SMI (N=23) N % N % N % N % N % Overall satisfaction with DARS Degree of satisfaction with your involvement in developing your Vocational Rehabilitation Plan Satisfied 251 77 36 78 17 81 30 81 18 78 Neither 15 5 4 9 3 14 0 0 2 9 Dissatisfied 56 17 4 9 1 5 7 19 3 13 Don't know 5 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Satisfied 232 73 36 78 15 75 26 70 18 78 Neither 20 6 6 13 3 15 5 14 3 13 Dissatisfied 55 17 3 7 2 10 6 16 2 9 Don't know 13 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 our general satisfaction with the time it took to develop your Rehabilitation Plan Did you encounter any problems or inconveniences with DARS? All of the people at DARS treated me well. If a friend of mine were in a similar situation to mine, I would tell them to go DARS. I always got the information I needed from DARS. My counselor took my case seriously. My counselor clearly explained services Satisfied 226 70 29 63 19 90 26 70 17 74 Neither 34 10 7 15 0 0 3 8 2 9 Dissatisfied 52 16 6 13 2 10 7 19 3 13 Don't know 12 4 4 9 0 0 1 3 1 4 Don't know 6 2 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rather not say 6 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 No 279 87 36 78 20 95 36 100 23 100 es 28 9 4 9 1 5 0 0 0 0 Agree 285 89 42 91 19 90 32 91 21 95 Neither 7 2 2 4 0 0 1 3 0 0 Disagree 26 8 1 2 2 10 2 6 1 5 Don't know 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Agree 265 82 36 78 19 90 29 81 20 91 Neither 10 3 1 2 0 0 1 3 0 0 Disagree 38 12 4 9 2 10 6 17 2 9 Don't know 9 3 5 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 Agree 244 76 38 83 18 86 31 86 19 86 Neither 20 6 4 9 1 5 1 3 2 9 Disagree 50 16 4 9 2 10 4 11 1 5 Don't know 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Agree 264 82 39 85 16 80 28 82 19 86 Neither 10 3 1 2 1 5 1 3 2 9 Disagree 43 13 3 7 3 15 5 15 1 5 Don't know 6 2 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Agree 269 83 41 89 18 90 30 86 19 86 Neither 8 2 2 4 1 5 0 0 0 0 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 24 of 38

VR (N=331) Dedicated Transition (N=46) RCD (N=21) SA (N=37) SMI (N=23) N % N % N % N % N % available to me. Disagree 40 12 2 4 1 5 5 14 1 5 Don't know 7 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 9 My counselor knew about programs in my community that could help me. I never felt my counselor was rushing me when we met or spoke about my case. My counselor always met the timetables we discussed for my vocational rehabilitation program. I received services that I needed. I benefited from services that I received. If you were to seek help again, would you come back to DARS? Are you currently earning wages or being paid for a job? (Status 26 & competitive employment status) 22 Overall satisfaction with your current job?(those earning wage) Agree 241 75 40 87 16 80 29 83 18 82 Neither 13 4 2 4 2 10 2 6 0 0 Disagree 44 14 3 7 1 5 4 11 1 5 Don't know 23 7 1 2 1 5 0 0 3 14 Agree 269 84 39 87 17 89 32 91 20 91 Neither 13 4 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 Disagree 32 10 3 7 2 11 2 6 2 9 Don't know 8 2 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Agree 251 78 35 76 18 90 27 77 18 82 Neither 14 4 3 7 0 0 2 6 1 5 Disagree 42 13 5 11 1 5 5 14 1 5 Don't know 16 5 3 7 1 5 1 3 2 9 Agree 239 74 35 76 15 75 26 74 17 77 Neither 14 4 1 2 3 15 2 6 1 5 Disagree 58 18 7 15 2 10 7 20 3 14 Don't know 11 3 3 7 0 0 0 0 1 5 Agree 236 73 33 73 17 85 25 71 17 77 Neither 19 6 2 4 2 10 4 11 1 5 Disagree 55 17 8 18 1 5 6 17 3 14 Don't know 12 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 1 5 es, definitely 199 61 30 65 14 67 25 68 15 65 es, I think so 61 19 6 13 6 29 4 11 4 17 No, I do not think so 15 5 2 4 1 5 5 14 1 4 No, definitely not 23 7 4 9 0 0 1 3 1 4 Don't know 26 8 4 9 0 0 2 5 2 9 es 154 87 26 90 11 85 18 78 10 91 No 24 13 3 10 2 15 5 22 1 9 Satisfied 127 84 23 92 9 82 12 71 7 70 Neither 9 6 0 0 2 18 3 18 3 30 Dissatisfied 16 11 2 8 0 0 1 6 0 0 Don t know 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 Do you expect to be in this es 90 71 13 57 6 67 8 67 5 71 22 Survey items related to job satisfaction include only those consumers who were successfully rehabilitated. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 25 of 38

same job a year from now? (consumers satisfied with job) VR (N=331) Dedicated Transition (N=46) RCD (N=21) SA (N=37) SMI (N=23) N % N % N % N % N % No 10 8 2 9 1 11 1 8 0 0 Don t know 26 21 8 35 2 22 3 25 2 29 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 26 of 38

Appendix A: 2011 Survey Results by Closure Status Consumers who are successfully employed have consistent satisfaction from year to year and those who are very satisfied with their involvement in developing the VR plan speak positively of the help, the counselors, or the service they receive from counselors and staff. This trend continued in 2011 with satisfaction percentages at or above 90% for nine of the fourteen survey items. Satisfaction with involvement in developing the VR plan and the time it took were 86% and 83%, respectively. Overall satisfaction was 90 percent (n=250). In contrast to consumers who are employed at closure, those who are not employed show slightly more variation in their satisfaction. Prior eight-year averages are below 79 percent for all except four of the 14 survey items. Survey items with eight-year averages at or above 79 percent are related to the initial phases of the process (treated well by people at DARS, counselor clearly explained services, counselor took the case seriously, and never felt counselor was rushing). Additionally, consumers who are not employed at closure have fairly consistent downward trends for overall satisfaction with DARS as well as satisfaction with involvement in developing the VR plan and the time it takes to develop the VR plan. Since 2009, there has been a downward trend in satisfaction for counselors meeting discussed timetables. In 2011, 28 consumers were very dissatisfied with their involvement (8 closed less than a year from application and 20 closed a year or more after application). Delayed status was not mentioned as an issue. While 16 consumers voiced perceptions of the experience (not much help, waste of time, did not meet my needs, and others), 12 provided input related to specific areas. 1. Nine consumers in the system for a year or more described perceptions that suggested a lack of understanding in the following areas. a. Why requests were not possible (perception of denial versus counselor s guidance or adherence to policy (n=5) b. Role of various individuals who assisted with the case (n=3) i. Perception of being passed around ii. Perception of discontinuity c. Expectation of what the counselor s responsibility was in communicating a piece of information (n=1) 2. Three consumers in the system for less than a year described perceptions related to counselors. a. No one assigned to case when counselor was out b. Counselor needs to be more understanding of consumer s needs and time c. Calls were never returned (consumer was still waiting for an individual to call) 2011 survey results by closure status are provided in the table below. Trends by Closure status are provided in igures 2a-h. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 27 of 38

2011 Survey Results by Closure Status Overall satisfaction with DARS Degree of satisfaction with your involvement in developing your Vocational Rehabilitation Plan our general satisfaction with the time it took to develop your Rehabilitation Plan Did you encounter any problems or inconveniences with DARS? All of the people at DARS treated me well. If a friend of mine were in a similar situation to mine, I would tell them to go to DARS. I always got the information I needed from DARS My counselor took my case seriously. My counselor clearly explained services available to me. Status 26 (N=278) Status 28 (N=186) All Self- Respondents (N=464) N % N % N % Satisfied 250 90 106 58 356 77 Neither 8 3 16 9 24 5 Dissatisfied 17 6 54 30 71 15 Don't Know 2 1 7 4 9 2 Satisfied 234 86 98 55 332 73 Neither 15 5 22 12 37 8 Dissatisfied 17 6 51 28 68 15 Don't Know 7 3 8 4 15 3 Satisfied 230 83 93 52 323 71 Neither 15 5 31 17 46 10 Dissatisfied 25 9 45 25 70 15 Don't Know 7 3 11 6 18 4 Don't know 5 2 6 3 11 2 Rather not say 0 0 9 5 9 2 No 253 94 145 80 398 88 es 11 4 22 12 33 7 Agree 261 96 144 80 405 90 Neither 3 1 7 4 10 2 Disagree 7 3 25 14 32 7 Don't Know 1 0 4 2 5 1 Agree 252 92 123 68 375 83 Neither 2 1 10 6 12 3 Disagree 15 5 37 21 52 11 Don't Know 4 1 10 6 14 3 Agree 242 90 114 63 356 79 Neither 10 4 18 10 28 6 Disagree 16 6 45 25 61 14 Don't Know 2 1 4 2 6 1 Agree 250 92 122 68 372 82 Neither 4 1 11 6 15 3 Disagree 16 6 39 22 55 12 Don't Know 1 0 8 4 9 2 Agree 254 93 129 71 383 85 Neither 1 0 10 6 11 2 Disagree 15 6 34 19 49 11 Don't Know 2 1 8 4 10 2 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 28 of 38

Status 26 (N=278) Status 28 (N=186) All Self- Respondents (N=464) N % N % N % My counselor knew about programs in my community that could help me. I never felt my counselor was rushing me when we met or spoke about my case. My counselor always met the timetables we discussed for my vocational rehabilitation program. I received services that I needed. I benefited from services that I received. If you were to seek help again, would you come back to DARS? Are you currently earning wages or being paid for a job? (Status 26 & competitive employment status) 23 Overall satisfaction with your current job?(those earning wage) Agree 236 87 114 63 350 78 Neither 11 4 8 4 19 4 Disagree 15 6 38 21 53 12 Don't Know 8 3 20 11 28 6 Agree 248 92 135 75 383 85 Neither 4 1 10 6 14 3 Disagree 14 5 27 15 41 9 Don't Know 3 1 8 4 11 2 Agree 241 89 114 63 355 79 Neither 5 2 15 8 20 4 Disagree 18 7 36 20 54 12 Don't Know 7 3 16 9 23 5 Agree 237 87 101 56 338 75 Neither 7 3 14 8 21 5 Disagree 20 7 57 32 77 17 Don't Know 7 3 8 4 15 3 Agree 242 90 92 51 334 74 Neither 6 2 22 12 28 6 Disagree 16 6 57 32 73 16 Don't Know 6 2 9 5 15 3 es, definitely 204 74 85 47 289 63 es, I think so 55 20 26 14 81 18 No, I do not think so 6 2 18 10 24 5 No, definitely not 7 3 22 12 29 6 Don't Know 4 1 30 17 34 7 223 86 es No 35 14 Satisfied 181 83 Neither 17 8 Dissatisfied 20 9 Don t know 1 0 23 Survey items related to job satisfaction include only those consumers who were successfully rehabilitated. or this report, competitive employment is employment in an integrated setting with or without supports or self-employment that is performed on a full-time or part-time basis for which an individual is compensated. Please note that respondents self-reported whether or not they were earning wages. 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 29 of 38

Do you expect to be in this same job a year from now? (consumers satisfied with job) Status 26 (N=278) Status 28 (N=186) All Self- Respondents (N=464) N % N % N % es 123 68 No 15 8 Don t know 42 23 2011 VR Consumer Satisfaction Survey Page 30 of 38