Can Information Change Personal Retirement Savings? Evidence from Social Security Benefits Statement Mailings. Susan Payne Carter William Skimmyhorn

Similar documents
Full Web Appendix: How Financial Incentives Induce Disability Insurance. Recipients to Return to Work. by Andreas Ravndal Kostøl and Magne Mogstad

Online Appendix Long-Lasting Effects of Socialist Education


Your Name (Please print) Did you agree to take the optional portion of the final exam Yes No. Directions

Shirking and Employment Protection Legislation: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

DYNAMICS OF URBAN INFORMAL

The Impact of Credit Counseling on Consumer Outcomes: Evidence from a National Demonstration Program

ECON Introductory Econometrics. Seminar 4. Stock and Watson Chapter 8

Web Appendix Figure 1. Operational Steps of Experiment

Figure 2.1 The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program

Appendix (for online publication)

Company Stock Price Reactions to the 2016 Election Shock: Trump, Taxes, and Trade INTERNET APPENDIX. August 11, 2017

Estimating Average and Local Average Treatment Effects of Education When Compulsory Schooling Laws Really Matter: Corrigendum.

Bargaining with Grandma: The Impact of the South African Pension on Household Decision Making

1. Modification algorithm

David Newhouse Daniel Suryadarma

Obesity, Disability, and Movement onto the DI Rolls

The Demographics of Wealth

institution Top 10 to 20 undergraduate

ABSTRACT. Asian Economic and Financial Review ISSN(e): ISSN(p): DOI: /journal.aefr Vol. 9, No.

Household Use of Financial Services

Online Appendix for Does mobile money affect saving behavior? Evidence from a developing country Journal of African Economies

THE FINANCIAL WELFARE OF MILITARY VETERANS: DESCRIPTIVE EVIDENCE FROM A NATIONAL SURVEY. William Skimmyhorn. August 8, 2017

1 Payroll Tax Legislation 2. 2 Severance Payments Legislation 3

Percentage of foreclosures in the area is the ratio between the monthly foreclosures and the number of outstanding home-related loans in the Zip code

Mining closures, gender, and employment reallocations: the case of UK coal mines

Supporting Information for:

Online appendix for W. Kip Viscusi, Joel Huber, and Jason Bell, Assessing Whether There Is a Cancer Premium for the Value of a Statistical Life

Online Appendix for: Behavioral Impediments to Valuing Annuities: Evidence on the Effects of Complexity and Choice Bracketing

The Impact of Shareholder Taxation on Merger and Acquisition Behavior

Economic Growth and Convergence across the OIC Countries 1

Problem Set 2. PPPA 6022 Due in class, on paper, March 5. Some overall instructions:

The Impact of International Patent Systems: Evidence from Accession to the European Patent Convention. November 2017

The Role of Fertility in Business Cycle Volatility

CHAPTER 4 ESTIMATES OF RETIREMENT, SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT TAKE-UP, AND EARNINGS AFTER AGE 50

Recovery measures of underfunded pension funds: contribution increase, no indexation, or pension cut? Leo de Haan

Final Exam, section 1. Thursday, May hour, 30 minutes

Financial Literacy and Financial Behavior among Young Adults: Evidence and Implications

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Statistics and Information Department

Whither Latin American Capital Markets?

Redistribution under OASDI: How Much and to Whom?

Public-private sector pay differential in UK: A recent update

FOR ONLINE PUBLICATION ONLY. Supplemental Appendix for:

BORROWING TO SAVE? UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT

THE STATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY a ONEAMERICA company One American Square, P.O. Box 406 Indianapolis, IN

University of Nottingham

Friendship at Work: Can Peer Effects Catalyze Female Entrepreneurship? Erica Field, Seema Jayachandran, Rohini Pande, and Natalia Rigol

COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION

Choices for retirement income products and financial advice: Appendices

Econ 371 Problem Set #4 Answer Sheet. 6.2 This question asks you to use the results from column (1) in the table on page 213.

Health and the Future Course of Labor Force Participation at Older Ages. Michael D. Hurd Susann Rohwedder

Online Appendix. Moral Hazard in Health Insurance: Do Dynamic Incentives Matter? by Aron-Dine, Einav, Finkelstein, and Cullen

The Effect of Financial Constraints, Investment Policy and Product Market Competition on the Value of Cash Holdings

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS. EUI Working Papers ECO 2009/02 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS. A Test of Narrow Framing and Its Origin.

Online Appendix Results using Quarterly Earnings and Long-Term Growth Forecasts

Violence, Non-violence, and the Effects of International Human Rights Law. Supplemental Information

This document provides additional information on the survey, its respondents, and the variables

The Effects of Increasing the Early Retirement Age on Social Security Claims and Job Exits

COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION

Beliefs in Technology and Support for Environmental Taxes: An Empirical Investigation

Name: 1. Use the data from the following table to answer the questions that follow: (10 points)

COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION

The AMS-Cluster Project

Does Early Life Exposure to Cigarette Smoke Permanently Harm Childhood Welfare? Evidence from Cigarette Tax Hikes David Simon Online Appendix

How Does Education Affect Mental Well-Being and Job Satisfaction?

Demographic and Economic Characteristics of Children in Families Receiving Social Security

The Decision to Delay Social Security Benefits: Theory and Evidence

ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS FINAL EXAM, WINTER 2002/3

Married Women s Labor Supply Decision and Husband s Work Status: The Experience of Taiwan

Demographic analysis -

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novapdf printer (

ESTIMATING THE RISK PREMIUM OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. Brandon Payne East Carolina University Department of Economics Thesis Paper November 27, 2002

Internet Appendix. The survey data relies on a sample of Italian clients of a large Italian bank. The survey,

Local Culture and Dividends

Online Appendix to. The Value of Crowdsourced Earnings Forecasts

Discussion of Relationship and Transaction Lending in a Crisis

Data Appendix. A.1. The 2007 survey

Internet Appendix for Corporate Cash Shortfalls and Financing Decisions. Rongbing Huang and Jay R. Ritter. August 31, 2017

Subsidy Policies and Insurance Demand 1

Supplemental Appendix for Cost Pass-Through to Higher Ethanol Blends at the Pump: Evidence from Minnesota Gas Station Data.

Better Financial Security in Retirement? Realizing the Promise of Longevity Annuities. Katharine G. Abraham Benjamin H. Harris November 6, 2014

BP Individual Savings Account Transfer Application Form

U.S. Job Flows and the China Shock

Figure 1.1 Inequality, Economic Growth, Employment Growth, and Real Income Growth in Sweden, Germany, and the United States, 1980s and 1990s

Financial Literacy, Social Networks, & Index Insurance

An Evaluation of Nonresponse Adjustment Cells for the Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 1

Dan Breznitz Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto, 1 Devonshire Place, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3K7 CANADA

Table IA.1 CEO Pay-Size Elasticity and Increased Labor Demand Panel A: IPOs Scaled by Full Sample Industry Average

Final Exam, section 1. Tuesday, December hour, 30 minutes

Internet Appendix for: Cyclical Dispersion in Expected Defaults

The Effect of Macroeconomic Conditions on Applications to Supplemental Security Income

The Effects of Elderly Employment Stabilization Law on Labor Supply and Employment Status *

Real Estate Investment Trusts and Calendar Anomalies

Discussion of The Growing Longevity Gap between Rich and Poor, by Bosworth, Burtless and Gianattasio

Diploma in Financial Management with Public Finance

Explaining procyclical male female wage gaps B

Supporting Online Material for

Labor Participation and Gender Inequality in Indonesia. Preliminary Draft DO NOT QUOTE

NYTD Survey- 17 year olds

Voting to Tell Others Online Appendix

Transcription:

Can Information Change Personal Retirement Savings? Evidence from Social Security Benefits Statement Mailings Susan Payne Carter William Skimmyhorn Online Appendix

Appendix Table 1. Summary Statistics by Control (No Statement) and Treatment (Received Statement) Group Strategy 2 Strategy 1 ( (Temporary 2012 ) Reintro) Treatment? No Yes No Yes Female (%) 35% 37% 39% 42% Education High School Grad (%) 28% 26% 27% 26% Some College (%) 17% 18% 21% 23% College (%) 49% 49% 45% 43% Grad Degree (%) 4% 5% 4% 5% Savings Rates Average TSP (%) 5.1 5.1 5.2 5.4 Average TSP (%) Windsorized 4.8 4.9 4.9 5.1 Likelihood of Saving (%) 88% 87% 91% 91% N 1,039 1,135 3,130 350 Strategy 3 (Reintroduction at 5 Year Age Ranges) Age Group 30 35 40 45 50 55 Treatment? No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Female (%) 40% 43% 38% 37% 39% 40% 41% 40% 39% 38% 36% 35% 36% 37% Education High School Grad (%) 32% 35% 30% 31% 33% 33% 35% 35% 36% 37% 35% 35% 34% 33% Some College (%) 21% 26% 17% 18% 17% 16% 18% 17% 18% 17% 19% 18% 19% 19% College (%) 34% 30% 36% 34% 30% 32% 28% 28% 26% % 26% 27% 27% 28% Grad Degree (%) 7% 3% 15% 15% 18% 18% 18% 19% 18% 18% 18% 19% 19% 18% Savings Rates Average TSP (%) 5.5 5.2 5.9 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.8 5.9 6.2 6.0 7.2 7.2 8.1 8.0 Likelihood of Saving (%) 94% 95% 92% 92% 90% 90% 87% 86% 87% 88% 88% 87% 89% 88% N 1,751 435 5,830 1,482 7,761 2,175 7,761 1,885 10,062 2,621 13,932 3,504 14,411 3,626 Notes: The table includes expanded summary statistics for our three different strategies. Strategy 1 includes only those who turn in. Strategy 2 includes those who turn in 2012. Strategy 3 includes those who turn 23-55 in the first half of 2015. Savings rates are computed for the six months following someone's relevant birthday.

Appendix Table 2 - Results for Males Treatment 0.07 0.43-0.16-0.30* -0.10 0.02-0.26* 0.06-0.49*** (0.21) (0.30) (0.30) (0.16) (0.14) (0.16) (0.14) (0.13) (0.14) Observations 1,403 2,145 1,321 4,561 6,322 5,778 7,859 11,305 11,542 R-squared 0.06 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 Control Mean 5.35 5.52 5.79 6.14 6.01 5.98 6.27 7.16 8.14 Treatment -0.03 0.01 0.02-0.01 0.00-0.02 0.01-0.01-0.02*** (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) Observations 1,403 2,145 1,321 4,561 6,322 5,778 7,859 11,305 11,542 R-squared 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 Control Mean 0.90 0.91 0.94 0.93 0.89 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.89 Notes: This table presents OLS regression coefficients for receiving a SSA statement on savings rates (Panel A) and the probability of savings (Panel B) for males only. Column 1 includes only those who turn in (treatment group: those who turn between January and June of ). Column 2 includes those who turn between October and December 2013 (treatment group: those who turn between October 2012 and December 2012). Columns 3-9 include those who turn 23-55 in the first half of 2015 (treatment group: those who turn, 30, 40, 45, 50, or 55 during that time). See the Empirical Strategy section of the paper for more details on each sample. Savings rates are computed for the six months following someone's relevant birthday. All regressions control for education and job category. Heteroskedasticity robust standard errors are provided in parentheses. ***, **, and * represent significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% level, respectively.

Appendix Table 3 - Results for Females Treatment -0.03-0.28 0.21-0.21 0.04 0.19-0.03-0.18 0.34* (0.) (0.) (0.32) (0.20) (0.16) (0.18) (0.18) (0.19) (0.19) Observations 795 1,367 889 2,785 4,045 3,927 4,893 6,211 6,560 R-squared 0.12 0.11 0.16 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 Control Mean 4.61 4.66 5.11 5.45 5.32 5.48 6.10 7.35 8.02 Treatment 0.01-0.00 0.02 0.02-0.01-0.02 0.02-0.01 0.01 (0.02) (0.03) (0.02) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) Observations 795 1,367 889 2,785 4,045 3,927 4,893 6,211 6,560 R-squared 0.06 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 Control Mean 0.85 0.90 0.93 0.92 0.90 0.88 0.87 0.88 0.89 Notes: This table presents OLS regression coefficients for receiving a SSA statement on savings rates (Panel A) and the probability of savings (Panel B) for females. Column 1 includes only those who turn in (treatment group: those who turn between January and June of ). Column 2 includes those who turn between October and December 2013 (treatment group: those who turn between October 2012 and December 2012). Columns 3-9 include those who turn 23-55 in the first half of 2015 (treatment group: those who turn, 30, 40, 45, 50, or 55 during that time). See the Empirical Strategy section of the paper for more details on each sample. Savings rates are computed for the six months following someone's relevant birthday. All regressions control for education and job category. Heteroskedasticity robust standard errors are provided in parentheses. ***, **, and * represent significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% level, respectively.

Apppendix Table 4 - Main Results for Individuals Not Previously Saving in the TSP (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Treatment -0.02 0.46* 0.16 0.17 0.08 0.08-0.13-0.02-0.10 (0.19) (0.27) (0.44) (0.14) (0.12) (0.10) (0.11) (0.09) (0.10) Observations 262 331 99 475 897 1,055 1,385 1,904 1,713 R-squared 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 Control Mean 0.48 0.63 0.49 0.35 0.42 0.35 0.44 0.39 0.38 Treatment -0.02 0.17** 0.05 0.06-0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01-0.04** (0.05) (0.08) (0.10) (0.04) (0.03) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) Observations 262 331 99 475 897 1,055 1,385 1,904 1,713 R-squared 0.05 0.06 0.11 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 Control Mean 0.14 0.16 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.10 Notes: This table presents OLS regression coefficients for receiving a SSA statement on savings rates (Panel A) and the probability of savings (Panel B) for those that were not saving prior to their birthday. Column 1 includes only those who turn in (treatment group: those who turn between January and June of ). Column 2 includes those who turn between October and December 2013 (treatment group: those who turn between October 2012 and December 2012). Columns 3-9 include those who turn 23-55 in the first half of 2015 (treatment group: those who turn, 30, 40, 45, 50, or 55 during that time). See the Empirical Strategy section of the paper for more details on each sample. Savings rates are computed for the six months following someone's relevant birthday. All regressions control for gender, education, and job category. Heteroskedasticity robust standard errors are provided in parentheses. ***, **, and * represent significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% level, respectively.

(DD) Appendix Table 5 - Robustness Analyses (Oct-Dec) (1 Year +/- Statement Birth Year) Treatment x 0.10 Treatment 0. 0.08-0.28** -0.08 0.13-0.** 0.05-0.18 (0.26) (0.23) (0.23) (0.13) (0.12) (0.13) (0.12) (0.12) (0.12) Observations 3,802 Observations 1,099 1,247 4,359 6,320 5,680 7,824 10,570 11,053 R-squared 0.08 R-squared 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 Mean 5.05 Mean 5.11 5.27 5.78 5.76 5.79 6.18 7.17 8.05 (DD) (Oct-Dec) (1 Year +/- Statement Birth Year) Treatment x 0.03 Treatment 0.01 0.01-0.01-0.00-0.01 0.00-0.01-0.01 (0.02) (0.02) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) Observations 3,802 Observations 1,099 1,247 4,359 6,320 5,680 7,824 10,570 11,053 R-squared 0.05 R-squared 0.03 0.07 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 Mean 0.86 Mean 0.91 0.94 0.93 0.90 0.87 0.88 0.87 0.89 Notes: This table presents regression coefficients of savings rates (Panel A) and savings probability (Panel B). Column 1 includes regression coefficients from a difference-in-difference analysis comparing those who turned 24 in between January and June or July and December (none of whom would have received the statement not have received the statement) and those who turned in the first or second half of (those who turned in the first half of the year would have received the statement). Column 2 and Columns 3-9 are the same as Table 2 except the control group in Column 2 are just those who are born in October through December and the control groups for Columns 3-9 are those who are born either the year before or the year after those who receive the statement. More details and the population samples are included in Empirical Strategy section of the paper. Savings rates are computed for the six months following someone's relevant birthday. All regressions control for gender, education, and job category. Heteroskedasticity robust standard errors are provided in parentheses. ***, **, and * represent significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% level, respectively.

Appendix Table 6 Individual Difference in Difference Post 0.10 0. 0.17 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.10 0.11 0.11 (0.17) (0.16) (0.14) (0.08) (0.07) (0.08) (0.07) (0.07) (0.08) Treatment -0.15 0.41 0.34 0.21 0.26** 0.41*** -0.04-0.07-0.12 (0.18) (0.26) (0.23) (0.13) (0.12) (0.15) (0.12) (0.12) (0.12) Treatment x Post 0.13-0.29 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.08 0.17 0.16 (0.) (0.35) (0.33) (0.19) (0.17) (0.21) (0.17) (0.17) (0.17) Obs 3,462 2,992 3,570 12,642 17,030 16,134 22,798 33,604 31,674 R2 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.05 Mean 5.02 5.22 5.30 5.43 5.51 5.54 6.04 7.19 7.98 Post 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00-0.00 0.00-0.00 0.00 0.00 (0.02) (0.01) (0.02) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) Treatment -0.02 0.00 0.07*** 0.04*** 0.02** 0.00 0.03*** -0.01 0.00 (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) Treatment x Post -0.00 0.02-0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01-0.00 (0.02) (0.03) (0.02) (0.02) (0.01) (0.02) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) Obs 3,462 2,990 1,900 6,546 8,792 8,286 11,865 17,119 16,148 R2 0.06 0.05 0.09 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 Mean 0.86 0.88 0.92 0.89 0.88 0.85 0.86 0.86 0.88 Notes: This table presents difference in difference coefficients for receiving a SSA statement on savings rates (Panel A) and the probability of savings (Panel B). We use savings rates before and after (Post = 1) an individual's birthday. Column 1 includes only those who turn in (treatment group: those who turn between January and June of ). Column 2 includes those who turn between October and December 2013 (treatment group: those who turn between October 2012 and December 2012). Columns 3-9 include those who turn 23-55 in the first half of 2015 (treatment group: those who turn, 30, 40, 45, 50, or 55 during that time)see the Empirical Strategy section of the paper for more details on each sample. Savings rates are computed for the six months following someone's relevant birthday. All regressions control for education and job category. Heteroskedasticity robust standard errors are provided in parentheses. ***, **, and * represent significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% level, respectively.