The deep freeze: the growing impact of sanctions on Jersey

Similar documents
INSTRUCTION (NUMBER 03/2014) FOR PRESCRIBED BUSINESSES UN, EU AND OTHER SANCTIONS

International Sanctions: where are we now? TOM CUMMINS 13 JUNE 2017

COMMISSION FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON EU RESTRICTIVE MEASURES IN SYRIA

Group Sanctions Policy

LOGSTOR International Sanctions Policy

Prudential Group. Sanctions Policy. September 2014

EU and US Sanctions. Summary of norms and Application Guidelines for Russia. AEB Legal Committee, supported by Baker&McKenzie CIS, Limited June 2014

Standard contractual clauses for the transfer of personal data to third countries - Frequently asked questions

Control of Housing and Work (Jersey) Law 2012

With many multi-million. Insights. Peace of mind. Negotiating the sanctions regulatory maze: Key jurisdictions to consider

Sanctions & Embargoes. Do you know how they work and how they may impact your business?

Financial Sanctions Notice 26/03/2012

Chapter 2: Duties of Financial Intermediaries Section 1: Duty of Due Diligence

Federal Act on Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing

Taking sanctions seriously

Federal Act on Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing

COUNCIL DECISION 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

Sanctions and Insurance

Guidelines on Freezing

TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I PETRONAS ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AND EXPORT CONTROL POLICY STATEMENT...4

Economic Sanctions Procedure

GUIDANCE NOTE UNITED STATES AND EUROPEAN UNION SANCTIONS

Kenya Gazette Supplement No th March, (Legislative Supplement No. 21)

Iran Sanctions Relief: Opportunities and Challenges for US and EU Financial Institutions

Handbook on International Co-operation and Information Exchange. for the use of overseas supervisory authorities

Iran - Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 Frequently Asked Questions

Horizon scanner Financial Crime and Cyber-security RISK RATING. Potential impact

PROCEEDS OF CRIME AND ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ACT

Dancing Around Landmines: Hot Topics in U.S. and Canadian Sanctions. Momentum Events Webinar November 20, 2014

Jersey company law guide: Q&A

Regulation of ICOs in Ireland: An Overview of the Legal, Tax and Regulatory Position

Impact of Canadian Economic Sanctions, Trade Controls and Anti-Corruption Laws on the AML Compliance Function

Adopted by the Security Council at its 6254th meeting, on 23 December 2009

Sanctions and End-Use Controls. Paul Whitfield-Jones Norton Rose Fulbright Julie Taylor Meggitt PLC

International Sanctions Ramifications of Recent Legal Developments

Private equity funds in Jersey

RJ Berry Financial Reporting Authority 21 March 2018

Guernsey funds. "Generally, all Guernseydomiciled

British Virgin Islands Regulatory Update

Chapter 1 General Provisions

Economic and Trade Sanctions Policy 30 March 2012

Why Russia breaks the sanctions mould. Ross Denton, Partner, Baker & McKenzie LLP

Agenda SCCE ECEI Why Russia breaks the sanctions mould. What are we going to cover? Ross Denton, Partner, Baker & McKenzie LLP

EU Sanctions Update. Chiara Klaui Senior Associate International Trade May 21, 2015

Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill

Presented by: Dennis Ansbro and Zoya Faynleyb ACAMS Greater Philadelphia Chapter December 10,2015

Consolidated text PROJET DE LOI ENTITLED. The European Communities (Implementation) (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 1994 * [CONSOLIDATED TEXT] NOTE

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM to the Regulation foreign currency transactions for Curaçao and Sint Maarten

Jersey eligible investor funds

ASX CLEAR OPERATING RULES Guidance Note 1

Trading Policy. Magellan Financial Group Limited ACN

EXPLANATORY NOTE ON ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AMENDMENT) ACT Zulkifli Hasan Faculty of Syariah and Law Islamic Science University of Malaysia

REPUBLIC OF VANUATU INTERNATIONAL BANKING ACT NO. 4 OF Arrangement of Sections

Solomon Islands. UNCTAD Compendium of Investment Laws. The Foreign Investment Bill 2005 (2006)

This document has been provided by the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL).

Competition & Trade Regulation Risks to Active Fund Managers

TREATY SERIES 2003 Nº 2. Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions

Namibia Investment Promotion Act 9 of 2016 (GG 6110) ACT

Appendix 2. In this Appendix underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text. The DFSA Rulebook

COMPUTERSHARE LIMITED CODE OF PRACTICE BUYING AND SELLING COMPUTERSHARE SECURITIES. Revised as of 24 April 2007 Board Meeting

Republic of Namibia. Foreign Investment Act

U.S. Trade Controls: Key Compliance Challenges

S/2003/385. Security Council. United Nations

Bill No. 2 Retirement Benefits Sector Liberalisation Bill 2011

Regulation of Fiduciaries, Administration Businesses and Company Directors, etc (Bailiwick of Guernsey) (Amendment) Regulations, 2008

Resolution 66/41. National Legislation on transfer of arms, military equipment and dual-use goods and technology. Ireland

Act 3 Anti-Money Laundering (Amendment) Act 2017

Guernsey trusts. GUERNSEY BRIEFING June 2013

REGULATORY OVERVIEW. I. Overview of the Laws and Regulations Relating to the Group s Business Operations in Hong Kong

RC & EVOLVING US SANCTIONS: MAINTAINING COMPLIANCE. risk compliance RISK & COMPLIANCE MAGAZINE. risk & compliance REPRINTED FROM: OCT-DEC 2018 ISSUE

The Perimeter Guidance Manual. Chapter 15. Guidance on the scope of the Payment Services Regulations 2017

Financial Crime & Punishment

Insights. Peace of mind. We explore the key issues you need to know about and navigate to become both sanctions and AML compliant

SAINT CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS STATUTORY RULES AND ORDERS. No. 46 of 2011

ANNEX III Sector-Specific Guidance Notes for Investment Business Providers, Investment Funds and Fund Administrators

Kathryn Gordon tel: ); Joachim Pohl tel: )

Sanctions Briefing. May wfw.com

GUIDE TO COMPANIES IN THE BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS

Final Report. Public Consultation No. 14/042

A New Regulatory Regime in BVI: SIBA 2010

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Comparison of Laws in Bermuda, the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands Relating to Offshore Companies

Doing business with Iran : sanctions risks for the shipping and logistics sector

Russia Sanctions United States by Swedish Club and Leigh Hansson, Partner, Reed Smith LLP, Reed Smith Shipping Sanctions 16 April 2018

Regulation of Securities Investment Business in the Cayman Islands

VIRGIN ISLANDS BANKS AND TRUST COMPANIES (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2006 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

France Germany Italy Netherlands Spain Portugal UK. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

NEX Exchange Growth Market Rules for Issuers 1 January 2017

ANNEX ANNEX. to the COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /...

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY

PAYMENT SERVICES LAW OF 2009 Directive issued by virtue of sections 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 19, 20, 23, 91 and 93

Standard 2.4. Customer identification and customer due diligence; Prevention of money laundering, terrorism financing and market abuse

Syria Sanctions 16 December 2014

Conyers Dill & Pearman

Voluntary national response to UN GA resolution 66/41. Norway

The UK Government has published Guidance Notes to help companies ensure they are in step with the new requirements ( the Guidance ).

SUPPLEMENTARY PEER REVIEW REPORT Phase 1 Legal and Regulatory Framework MARSHALL ISLANDS

Sanctions xx Policy. August Policy owner:

READING COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTRE

Authorised Officer means the Company Secretary of the Company, or in his absence, the Managing Director.

Transcription:

JERSEY GUERNSEY LONDON BVI SINGAPORE JERSEY BRIEFING January 2015 The deep freeze: the growing impact of sanctions on Jersey "In recent times there has been a marked increase in the use of co-ordinated economic sanctions by the EU, the UN and individual states against rogue states and organisations and on a targeted basis against specific individuals and entities related to those rogue states and organisations. This is having material consequences far outside of those states and organisations." What are sanctions? A sanction is a measure adopted usually by several nations acting together (notably the European Union and the United Nations) against a regime, state, organisation, individual or entity believed to be violating international law. Sanctions can also be imposed by individual states. They may include an asset freeze on financial assets, the withdrawal of financial services, bans or restrictions on trade of goods and travel restrictions on individuals. Economic or financial sanctions can be either "comprehensive" so that they are directed against a particular state or regime or "targeted" so that they are directed against named individuals or entities often connected to a particular state or regime. Why are sanctions used? The rationale for sanctions can differ but for the most part sanctions are introduced to bring about a change in the conduct of a country, regime or individual; to place pressure on a country to comply with set objectives; as a punitive measure when international peace and security are at risk or have been violated and diplomatic efforts have failed or to deter, prevent and suppress the financing of terrorism and terrorist acts. More recently targeted sanctions have also been used to prevent the dissipation of assets purportedly belonging to the country of origin from individuals connected with an overthrown regime. Some sanctions are unlimited in duration others remain in force for a specific time period. Why the recent interest? In recent times there has been a marked increase in the use of co-ordinated economic sanctions by the EU, the UN and individual states against rogue states and organisations and on a targeted basis against specific individuals and entities related to those rogue states and organisations. This is having material consequences far outside of those states and organisations. Given Jersey's role as an international finance centre it is inevitable that international sanctions are and will continue to impact upon Jersey's financial services sector. The number of countries which are the subject of the EU s targeted economic sanctions continues to grow, with over thirty countries now affected. The EU's response to the Ukraine crisis has been to pass legislation imposing financial sanctions on named individuals and businesses they believe to be responsible for the on-going situation in Ukraine. Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014, Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 and Council Regulation (EU) No 692/2014 of 23 June 2014 (together the "EU Ukraine Regulations") provide for restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine and in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. The EU Ukraine Regulations laid the groundwork for further targeted sanctions against Russian individuals and businesses. Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 (the "EU Russian Regulations") concerns restrictive measures in view of what was perceived to be Russia's continued

JERSEY BRIEFING 2 "In Jersey, the Chief Minister's Department is responsible for coordinating the introduction of local sanctions legislation, thus ensuring that the Island's sanctions regime is in line with international developments." actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine. The EU Ukraine Regulations were implemented in Jersey adopting the procedure detailed below by means of the EU Legislation (Sanctions - Ukraine) (Jersey) Order 2014 on 3 December 2014 as subsequently amended and similarly the EU Russian Regulations by way of the EU Legislation (Sanctions - Russia) (Jersey) Order 2014 on 12 December 2014 (together the "Jersey Orders"). By paragraph 4 of each of the Jersey Orders, the EU Regulations have effect in Jersey subject to certain modifications to the text reflecting the fact that Jersey is not a member state of the EU and by virtue of the EU Legislation (Sanctions) (General Provisions) (Jersey) Order 2014. The EU Ukraine Regulations and the EU Russian Regulations followed the sanctions regimes already imposed against Syria, Libya, Egypt and Tunisia in the aftermath of the Arab Spring and the more long standing sanctions regimes imposed against Iran and North Korea, amongst others. How are international sanctions implemented in Jersey? In Jersey, the Chief Minister's Department is responsible for co-ordinating the introduction of local sanctions legislation, thus ensuring that the Island's sanctions regime is in line with international developments. Jersey is not part of the EU for the purposes of sanctions. To this extent international sanctions are brought into force in Jersey by way of domestic legislation. EU sanctions measures will usually come into force by way of Regulations of the States or, more commonly now, by Orders of the Minister for External Relations pursuant to the European Union Legislation (Implementation) (Jersey) Law 2014 and the EU Legislation (Sanctions) (General Provisions) (Jersey) Order 2014 which provides a standard framework for the implementation of EU sanctions. In practice Jersey orders implementing EU sanctions will follow soon after the coming into force of the EU sanctions. A different procedure is adopted for the implementation of UN Security Council Resolutions, albeit if these Resolutions are adopted by the EU, recent practice has been to implement them by way of the procedure detailed above rather than by an Order in Council made under Section 1 of the United Nations Act 1946. The territorial effect of sanctions This issue is not straightforward but sanctions introduced by domestic Jersey legislation adopting the usual framework referred to above are capable of having effect both in and outside of Jersey. Sanctions will generally apply to any legal person or body incorporated or constituted under Jersey law in respect of any business done in whole or in part in Jersey. However, sanctions will also apply to any legal person, entity or body incorporated or constituted under Jersey law, regardless of where that person carries on business (e.g. so would extend to a Jersey company with its management and control in Switzerland). It is also worth noting that EU regulations implementing sanctions will generally apply to any national of a member state of the EU, whether that person is inside or outside the territory of the EU. By way of example it would apply to employees of a financial services business in Jersey who are British nationals (as many will be) or nationals of another EU member state. The EU regulations will also generally be capable of affecting actions implemented in Jersey with regard to assets of a company or trust held within the EU (e.g. a Jersey company or trust with a bank account or investment portfolio held in the EU). To the extent there is any doubt as to whether sanctions apply specific legal advice should be obtained. What is prohibited? In recent times EU regulations implementing economic sanctions, which are subsequently brought into force in Jersey pursuant to the procedure detailed above, adopt a similar framework. By way of example Article 2(1) of Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 provides "All funds and economic resources belonging to, owned, held or controlled by" the designated persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex 1 "shall be frozen". By Article 2(2) "No funds or economic resources shall be made available, directly or indirectly, to or for the benefit" of the persons, entities or bodies listed in Annex 1. A designated person for these purposes is one of the targeted individuals specifically blacklisted in the sanctions. The freeze broadly covers all assets of targeted individuals or entities. It means that financial assets, such as cash, cheques, bank deposits, stocks, shares, etc. may not be

JERSEY BRIEFING 3 "The asset freeze also includes a ban on providing resources to the targeted persons and entities. This means that EU citizens and companies must not make payments or supply goods and other assets to them." accessed, moved or sold. The criterion in determining ownership includes being in possession of 50% of the proprietary rights of an entity or having a majority interest in it. Criteria taken into account in establishing control include, inter alia, control over the board membership or sharing the financial liabilities of a company. The asset freeze also includes a ban on providing resources to the targeted persons and entities. This means that EU citizens and companies must not make payments or supply goods and other assets to them. In effect, business transactions with designated persons and companies cannot legally be carried out although it may be feasible to obtain a licence from the relevant authorities authorising a particular action by way of an exception to the ban. The EU Russian Regulations reflect a wider package of sanctions against Russian individuals and businesses. These sanctions include, inter alia, a prohibition on the buying or selling of transferable securities and money-market instruments with a maturity exceeding ninety days issued by certain entities to include major state-owned Russian banks. The export of certain dual-use goods and technology for military use and energyrelated equipment and technology are restricted in the form of prior authorisation requirements from competent authorities. In light of the above, Jersey businesses which undertake Russian business should check the scope of any pre-existing contracts with Russian counterparties to ensure these do not relate to the provision of prescribed products and services for use in Russia. Likewise, Jersey financial services businesses which are party to financing transactions with Russian banks should take legal advice to determine whether these transactions are caught and, if so, what options are available in the circumstances. Noting the penal sanction for breach if there is any doubt at all about whether the sanctions apply legal advice should be obtained. Are there any exceptions to the asset freeze and other restrictive measures? In certain cases, national competent authorities can permit derogations from the asset freeze under specific exemptions, for instance to cover basic needs (such as foodstuffs, rent, medicines or taxes) or reasonable legal fees. In respect of the EU Russian Regulations there are certain exemptions for orders under preexisting contracts. Alternatively, if contracts are caught there may be scope to obtain authorisation to perform the contract from competent authorities by way of licence. Do trustees need to be concerned? With regard to the EU Ukraine Regulations, which are consistent with other EU regulations implementing international sanctions as applied in Jersey, the essential question is whether, on or after the coming into force of the legislation, any assets of a trust can be said to be "funds" or "economic resources" which are "belonging to, owned, held or controlled by" a designated person. If they can, they must be "frozen" and no person may "deal with" the assets. Whether trust assets constitute a fund or economic resource of a designated person is not necessarily a straight forward question for a trustee. Indeed, a settlor or third party reserved with a power to direct a trustee to pay trust assets to himself or to another person, or to direct the sale and investment of trust assets, may well fall within the meaning of "controlled". The reference to funds and economic funds simply being "held" shows that there is no need for the designated person to actually have any beneficial interest in the assets or title to the assets. Trust issues by their nature are rarely the same and will require careful analysis on a case by case basis. Given the complexity of these issues and the severe penalty for breach (see below) trustees should take legal advice as early as possible with a view to avoiding any breach. What about frozen assets owned jointly by designated and non-designated persons? The EU Ukraine Regulations as applied in Jersey (which are consistent with other EU regulations implementing international sanctions as applied in Jersey) do not address the position where a designated person under those sanctions holds an interest in an asset with others who are not designated persons under the sanctions. Guidance issued by the EU 1, although not legally binding, does suggest co-mingled assets should be considered subject to the sanctions. However, the guidance contemplates the possibility of an application being made to the relevant authority for permission to deal with the portion of a jointly held asset belonging to 1 See "Restrictive measures (Sanctions) Update of the EU Best Practices for the effective implementation of restrictive measures" -8666/1/08 REV 1.

JERSEY BRIEFING 4 "Breaches may well result in prosecution for criminal offences and fines. The penalties are usually imprisonment for a term of up to two years and/or a fine." a person who is not subject to any sanctions. In some circumstances it may be feasible to segregate the assets between designated persons and non-designated persons. Again service providers with this issue, whether in a trust context or not, should take legal advice as early as possible to determine whether segregation of the assets is an option. Penalties Penalties for breaching sanctions are set out in the legislation implementing the particular sanctions measures. Breaches may well result in prosecution for criminal offences and fines. The penalties are usually imprisonment for a term of up to two years and/or a fine. If an offence has been committed by a corporate entity, that entity will in all likelihood be culpable of an offence as well as any senior officer if they consented to such breach or it can be attributable to their neglect. Plainly the penalties for breach are material both in terms of criminal sanctions, personal liability and reputational damage. Responsibility for monitoring of sanctions in Jersey Individual businesses are responsible for monitoring and ensuring compliance with sanctions orders through their compliance officers and are overseen by the Jersey Financial Services Commission ("JFSC") which circulates updates with regard to the introduction of new sanctions as well as producing practical guidance notes. It is clear that the JFSC will expect financial services businesses to have proportionate systems and controls in place to reduce the risk of a financial sanctions breach taking place. How those systems and controls are formulated will depend on the business model, profile and customer base of the relevant business. Bedell Cristin Sanctions team Whether or not events in Ukraine prompt a further round of sanctions remains to be seen. However, what is more certain is that this is a rapidly expanding practice area which is here to stay. Bedell Cristin's dedicated sanctions team advises institutions, trust companies and individuals on the impact of sanctions in relation to substantive trust structures, funds and individual accounts. Noting the particular complexities which arise with trusts the team comprises both trust specialists and litigators. Continued on following page

JERSEY BRIEFING 5 For further information, please contact: Jersey Mark Taylor Partner T +44 (0)1534 814857 E mark.taylor@ Henry Wickham Senior Associate T +44 (0)1534 814613 E henry.wickham@ 2015 Bedell Cristin The information contained in this briefing is intended to provide a brief update in relation to the topics covered. The information and opinions expressed in this briefing do not purport to be definitive or comprehensive and are not intended to provide legal advice and should not be acted or relied upon as doing so. Professional advice appropriate to the specific situation should always be obtained. No responsibility or liability is accepted in connection with the content of any websites to which you may gain access from this briefing.