From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

Similar documents
The plaintiff complaining of defendants, alleges and says: INTRODUCTION

Case 1:17-cv MJW Document 5 Filed 03/03/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10

Case 3:09-cv N-BQ Document 201 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 3204

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

Case 2:17-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

Case 2:17-cv JMV-SCM Document 1 Filed 08/01/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA -CIVIL DIVISION-

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv JEM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2012 Page 1 of 18

Information & Instructions: Response to a Motion To Lift The Automatic Stay Notice and Proof of Service

Case 2:12-cv CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 06/15/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT COMPLAINT. 17 RCW , RCW , and RCW The Attorney General brings this

INTRODUCTION. TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ("UBER" or "Defendant") pursuant to North Carolina's Unfair and

IC Chapter 7. Small Loans

Case 1:13-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, allege as follows:

4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

Filing # E-Filed 05/23/ :26:50 PM

Eisele Ashburn Greene & Chapman, PA, by Douglas G. Eisele, for Plaintiff Lavonne R. Ekren

NC General Statutes - Chapter 24 1

Texas State Statutes Regulating Debt Collection / Debt Collectors FINANCE CODE: CHAPTER 392. DEBT COLLECTION

Merchant Cash & Capital, LLC v Yehowa Med. Servs., Inc NY Slip Op 31590(U) July 29, 2016 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number:

8:18-cv DCC Date Filed 01/03/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHILTON COUNTY, ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO GAO. VINIETA LAWRENCE, Plaintiff, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant.

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 1 Filed 02/27/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

NY CLS Gen Oblig (2004)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

NC General Statutes - Chapter 54C Article 5 1

Case 3:12-cv HZ Document 23-1 Filed 11/25/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID#: 87

Purpose of article. Mississippi Statutes. Title 75. REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE AND INVESTMENTS. Chapter 67. LOANS

SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

CALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION This title may be cited as the "Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971."

FTC And State Attorneys General: How To Avoid Being Investigated And What To Do (And Not Do) If Your Company Is

DATE FILED: 1-/2311 L

TITLE 43 CREDIT TRANSACTION CODE TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, v. Case No. COMPLAINT

54TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2019

TITLE LOAN AGREEMENT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/25/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2014 EXHIBIT

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)

FIXED RATE PROMISSORY NOTE (INTEREST-ONLY PAYMENTS)

Case 3:16-cv MCR-CJK Document 18 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: 0:17-cv HRW Doc #: 1 Filed: 04/13/17 Page: 1 of 16 - Page ID#: 1

IN A MATTER BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF BANKS DOCKET NO. 06:035:RAL ) ) ) ) )

Attorneys for Applicant Insurance Commissioner of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

ORDER OF THE COURT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; SETTLEMENT HEARING; AND CLAIM AND EXCLUSION PROCEDURES

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 10

NC General Statutes - Chapter 53 Article 21 1

IC Chapter 2. Cigarette Fair Trade Act

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

HP0944, LD 1343, item 1, 124th Maine State Legislature An Act To Promote Consumer Fairness in Tax Refund Anticipation Loans

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/21/2008 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff(s) Case No: 09-cv-3332 MJD/JJK

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

DISTRICT COURT, BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO th Street Boulder, Colorado THE STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. John W. Suthers, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. IN AND FOR DUVAL f} C A. Plaintiff, Case No. COMPLAINT

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF BANKS, Defendant. " CONSOLIDATED WITH

Mini-Brooks Qualifications Based Selection Supplement of Design/Build Statutes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Kansas Credit Services Organization Instructions for Application of Registration

LICENSED LOAN ORIGINATOR AGREEMENT

Case 2:18-cv Document 3 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CIVIL DIVISION

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INDEMNITY AGREEMENT (Unsecured)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Application for Consumer Finance License

MODEL CONSUMER DEBT MANAGEMENT SERVICES ACT February 2004

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

SUPERVISION OF TRUSTEES AND FUNDRAISERS FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES ACT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff R.J. Zayed ( Plaintiff or Receiver ), through his undersigned counsel

CHAPTER 244 FORECLOSURE AND REDEMPTION OF MORTGAGES*

Senate Bill 1553 Ordered by the Senate March 2 Including Senate Amendments dated March 2

PLACEMENT AGREEMENT [, 2016] Re: $13,000,000 Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority Revenue Bonds (J.R. Cannone Project), Series 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 2356

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/14 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:06-cv KMW Document Filed 06/07/2010 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT A

Ricardo Alexses N avapulido D/B/ A Corporate Insurance Services Dm/ A.J:\IM Insurance..\gency

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO.: JUDGE

Title 33: PROPERTY. Chapter 9: MORTGAGES OF REAL PROPERTY. Table of Contents

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 3-1 Filed 09/18/17 Page 1 of 40 PageID #: 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

PROMISSORY NOTE TERM TABLE. BORROWER S PRINCIPAL (manager):

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 22 Filed: 09/06/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:630

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND KLEINBANK I. INTRODUCTION

Filing # E-Filed 12/15/ :11:41 PM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/02/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/02/2016

Case 2:06-cv JWL-DJW Document 1 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

The People of the State of New York, by and through their attorney, Eric T.

Transcription:

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAKE '"'.'! 4,, '. IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE 11, $UPERIOR COURT DIVISION '. i.. 16CV005373 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel. Josh Stein, Attorney General, V. Plaintiff, LIQUIDATION, LLC; LOAN SERVICING SOLUTION, LLC; SERVICING COMPANY DE, LLC; WILLIAM WALTER MCKIBBIN, III; KEVIN LEE CRONIN; MARK EDWARD WEINER; and BOBBY JOE MCKIBBIN; individually and collectively d/b/a AUTOLOANS, LLC; CAR LOAN, LLC; and SOVEREIGN LENDING SOLUTIONS, LLC; and Other unnamed individuals and entities; And Defendants; NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES; Nominal Defendant only, named solely for purposes of injunctive relief. FINAL JUDGMENT and DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER AS TO DEFENDANTS LIQUIDATION, LLC, LOAN SERVICING SOLUTION, LLC, SERVICING COMP ANY DE, LLC, WILLIAM WALTER MCKIBBIN, III, and BOBBY JOE MCKIBBIN THIS CAUSE came on to be heard before the undersigned judge on Plaintiffs, the State of North Carolina, ex rel. Attorney General Josh Stein, motion for a final judgment and a default judgment and permanent injunction order against Defendants Liquidation, LLC, Loan Servicing Solution, LLC, Servicing Company DE, LLC, William Walter McKibbin, III, and Bobby Joe McKibbin, individually and collectively doing business as AutoLoans, LLC, Car Loan, LLC, and 1

Sovereign Lending Solutions, LLC (hereafter, "Default Defendants". Default Defendants did not appear and were not represented by counsel. From the record herein and argument of counsel, the Court finds as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The State filed its Complaint and a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, which included seven supporting affidavits with documentary exhibits, on April 25, 2016. 2. In its Complaint, the State alleged that Default Defendants, acting in concert with the other named Defendants, 1 engaged in an illegal lending scheme in North Carolina by soliciting, extending, and collecting on usurious vehicle title loans made to North Carolina consumers that grossly exceeded allowable interest rate limits, and without being duly licensed, in violation of the Consumer Finance Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. 53-164, et seq., Chapter 24 of the General Statutes, and the Pawnbrokers and Cash Converters Modernization Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. 66-385, et seq.; and engaged in unfair and deceptive practices by, among other practices, repossessing consumers' vehicles that secured such illegal loans, in violation ofn.c. Gen. Stat. 75-1.1. 3. Since about 2014, through solicitations on the Internet and by telephone, Default Defendants have made and collected on more than 700 loans issued to North Carolina consumer borrowers, which Default Defendants secured by obtaining and recording liens upon consumers' car titles. Default Defendants have loaned amounts to North Carolina borrowers ranging from a low of $800.00 to an approximate high of $7,000.00, with the majority of borrowers receiving 1 As explained in paragraph 7. below, "Defendants" does not include NC-DMV, which is a nominal defendant only, and was named by the State solely to effectuate complete relief with regard to vehicle titles. 2

loan amounts ranging from $1,000.00 to $2,500.00. The annual percentage rate of interest ("APR" on the loans range from a low of 161 % to a high of 571 %; and the average APR on the loans is 257%. The majority of the loans made to North Carolina borrowers require borrowers to make monthly payments for a period of 11 months, and then contain a final balloon payment due in the twelfth month, in an amount that often exceeds the original loan amount. 4. Default Defendants' consumer loan agreements purport to be "pawn" transactions, and are styled as a "Pawn Ticket and Agreement." In fact, Default Defendants' transactions with North Carolina borrowers constitute consumer loans and are not pawn transactions, as at all times, consumers retained possession of their vehicles, unless and until Default Defendants seized them through repossession. 5. On April 28, 2016, this Court entered a Temporary Restraining Order, which was extended by orders entered by this Court on May 9, 2016 and on May 16, 2016. Among other provisions, the Temporary Restraining Order ordered Defendants to produce records identifying all loans made to North Carolina consumer borrowers by Defendants and account records for each such loan. Defendants failed to comply and produced no records to the State. On May 23, 2016, this Court entered a Preliminary Injunction Order which enjoined Defendants from soliciting, making, or collecting on any consumer loans to North Carolina borrowers and from placing or transferring liens on North Carolina consumers' vehicle titles, except to return them to consumers. 6. Default Defendants failed to file an answer or other responsive pleading, and an entry of default was entered against all Default Defendants on November 28, 2016. 2 2 Entries of default were also entered against individual Defendants Kevin Lee Cronin ("Cronin" and Mark Edward Weiner ("Weiner". On or about March 13, 2017, Defendants Cronin and Weiner retained counsel who notified counsel for the State that they were represented. Consent 3

7. Nominal Defendant, the North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles ("NC- DMV" is a division of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, an administrative agency of the State of North Carolina, which is responsible for generating and maintaining records of motor vehicle titles and recording and releasing any associated liens that may be recorded on motor vehicle titles. NC-DMV has no relationship to Default Defendants or any other Defendant. NC-DMV was named as a defendant solely for the purpose of effectuating injunctive relief, including restraining Defendants' placement of liens on North Carolina consumers' vehicle titles and Defendants' transfer of such titles; and to effect the cancellation of Defendants' liens. The State asserts no claims against, and seeks no monetary relief from NC- DMV. 8. NC-DMV has appeared in the action through counsel and filed an answer on May 26, 2016. Due to the fact that NC-DMV was included as a party solely for jurisdictional and equitable purposes regarding any orders of the Court affecting automobile titles and associated liens recorded and maintained as a governmental function of NC-DMV, the terms "Defendant," "Defendants," and "Default Defendants" do not include NC-DMV; and NC-DMV is separately identified as "NC-DMV" where applicable. Counsel for NC-DMV has reviewed this Final Judgment and has no objection to its entry. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 9. The Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action. 10. Default Defendants were properly served process under N.C.R. Civ. P. 4. 11. The usury laws of North Carolina iterate that the protection of North Carolina borrowers from illegal, usurious loans is a "paramount public policy" of the State, as N.C. Gen. Judgments are being entered with regard to them as of today's date. 4

Stat. 24-2.1 (g provides: "It is the paramount public policy of North Carolina to protect North Carolina resident borrowers through the application of North Carolina interest laws." 12. The Consumer Finance Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. 53-166(a, requires that any person engaged in the business of lending cannot "directly or indirectly" contract for or receive consideration greater than that allowed by Chapter 24 of the North Carolina General Statutes without being licensed by the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks as a consumer finance lender. 13. The maximum rate allowed by Chapter 24, N.C. Gen. Stat. 24-1.1, on contract loans of $25,000 or less, is 16% per annum. 14. The Consumer Finance Act provides an exception to the 16% cap on interest rates set forth by Chapter 24, and allows consumer finance lenders licensed by the Commissioner of Banks to make consumer loans of up to $15,000 at interest rates permitted by the Act. 15. For loans made on or after July 1, 2013, 3 pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 53-176, the maximum interest rate that may be charged by licensed lenders to North Carolina consumer borrowers is 30% per annum. 16. For loans made prior to July 1, 2013, pursuant to former N.C. Gen. Stat. 53-173, the maximum interest rate that may be charged by licensed lenders to North Carolina consumer borrowers is 36% per annum. 17. In an effort to address "illicit lending schemes" devised by lenders seeking to evade state usury laws, the North Carolina General Assembly amended the Consumer Finance 3 Session Law 2013-162 (SB 489, which became effective on July 1, 2013, made amendments to the Consumer Finance Act, which included increasing the maximum loan amount permitted under the Act from $10,000 to $15,000; altering the brackets governing the blended interest rates authorized by the Act; and reducing the maximum interest rate from 36% per annum to 30% per annum. 5

Act in 2006 to add a new provision, N.C. Gen. Stat. 53-166(b, which expressly provides that the prohibitions of N.C. Gen. Stat. 53-166(a "apply to any person who seeks to avoid its application by any device, subterfuge, or pretense whatsoever." 18. Default Defendants have engaged in the business of lending and are therefore subject to the provisions of the Consumer Finance Act, including N.C. Gen. Stat. 53-166. None of the Default Defendants nor any other Defendant is or has ever been licensed as a consumer finance lender by the Commissioner of Banks. 19. Default Defendants have regularly made consumer loans to North Carolina borrowers at rates far in excess of the allowable limits in the Consumer Finance Act. 20. The Consumer Finance Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. 53-166(d, expressly provides that loans made in violation of the Act are "void," and further provides that "any party in violation shall not collect, receive, or retain any principal or charges whatsoever with respect to the [illegal] loan." 21. Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 53-190(a, loans made to North Carolina borrowers in violation of the Consumer Finance Act are unenforceable. 22. N.C. Gen. Stat. 53-180(g prohibits deceptive acts or practices both with regard to the making of loans and collecting or attempting to collect money alleged to be due under loans subject to the Act. From the affidavits and record in this case, the State has made a sufficient showing to support its allegations, and the entry of this judgment. BASED ON THE FOREGOING and the record herein, the Court concludes that good and sufficient cause exists for the entry of this Final Judgment, and Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order as to Defendants Liquidation, LLC, Loan Servicing Solution, LLC, 6

Servicing Company DE, LLC, William Walter McKibbin,!IL and Bobby Joe McKibbin (hereafter "Final Judgment" pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 53-166, 24-1.1, 24-2, 24-2.1, 75-14, 75-15, and 75-15.1. FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: A. All consumer loans made by Default Defendants to North Carolina consumer borrowers, including but not limited to transactions styled as pawns, are deemed void, and are hereby cancelled pursuant to Chapters 24, 53 and 75 of the General Statutes. Default Defendants, including any assignees or successors of Default Defendants, or any subsequent purchasers of Default Defendants' loans to North Carolina consumer borrowers, shall have no right to payment on, or to collect upon, such loans. B. Liens placed by Default Defendants on North Carolina borrowers' vehicle titles, including any liens recorded under any aliases, alternative spellings, or variations of the names of the Default Defendants or any affiliated entities, are hereby declared void and shall be cancelled; and new vehicle titles cancelling Default Defendants' liens shall be issued to North Carolina borrowers who are in possession of their vehicle(s, request a new title, and are otherwise entitled to a new title. C. All funds of the corporate Default Defendants frozen by this Court's Preliminary Injunction Order entered on April 28, 2016, and held in the name(s of Liquidation, LLC; Loan Servicing Solution, LLC; or Servicing Company DE, LLC; or any other name used by Default Defendants, including but not limited to: Loan Servicing Solutions, LLC; Sovereign Lending Solutions, LLC; Management Company, LLC; AutoLoans, LLC; Car Loan, LLC; and/or Buy, Rent, Sell, LLC, hereby shall be released to the North Carolina Department of Justice for use for 7

consumer restitution and consumer protection purposes, in the discretion of the North Carolina Attorney General. More specifically, in accordance with this provision, all funds held in the following specified accounts at the financial institutions named below shall be transferred by the financial institution to the North Carolina Department of Justice within five (5 business days of the financial institution's receipt of a copy of this Final Judgment, Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order: (1 Account of Loan Servicing Solution, LLC - Account number ending in 9009 at Citibank, N.A.; (2 Account of Servicing Company DE, LLC - Account number ending in 0317 at Fifth Third Bank; (3 Account of Servicing Company DE, LLC - Account number ending in 3222 at First Internet Bank; (4 Account of Buy, Rent, Sell, LLC - Account number ending in 0200 at Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; and (5 Account of Loan Servicing Solution, LLC - Merchant Account held at Offspring Financial, LLC. PERMANENT INJUNCTION PROVISIONS IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Default Defendants Liquidation, LLC; Loan Servicing Solution, LLC; Servicing Company DE, LLC; William Walter McKibbin, III; and Bobby Joe McKibbin, individually and collectively doing business as AutoLoans, LLC; Car Loan, LLC; and Sovereign Lending Solutions, LLC, together with their officers, agents, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active or future concert or participation with them, are hereby permanently enjoined as follows: A. Default Defendants shall not assign, transfer, or sell, or attempt to assign, transfer, or sell any existing consumer loans made to North Carolina borrowers to any person or entity; and if any such loans have been assigned, transferred, or sold, Default Defendants shall notify all 8

assignee(s or purchaser(s that such loans are void and have been cancelled pursuant to this Final Judgment, and that the assignee or purchaser has no right to collect on the loans. B. Default Defendants shall not engage, participate, or facilitate, directly or indirectly, in soliciting, offering, making, arranging, or collecting on any consumer loans, including loans styled as pawns, to North Carolina borrowers;. C. Default Defendants shall not engage, participate, or facilitate, directly or indirectly, in the placement of liens on vehicles or vehicle titles of North Carolina consumers or repossess any vehicle owned by a North Carolina consumer borrower, or located in the State of North Carolina. D. "Consumer loan" as used in this Final Judgment, Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order shall include any transaction, the purpose of which, taken as a whole, is to advance funds to a North Carolina consumer, or to a North Carolina sole proprietor where the funds are actually used for a personal, family or household purpose, with the expectation of repayment, whether the transaction is styled as a loan, pawn, lease, or other transaction. CIVIL PENAL TIES IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the State, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 75-1.1 and 75-15.2, shall have and recover of Default Defendants Liquidation, LLC; Loan Servicing Solution, LLC; Servicing Company DE, LLC; William Walter McKibbin, III; and Bobby Joe McKibbin;jointly and severally, the sum of three million and five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000.00 for civil penalties. To the extent loan account information becomes available to the State from which the State may determine restitution owed 9

by Default Defendants to North Carolina consumers, the State may move to amend this judgment to include a money judgment for such amount. This the tf By: --... 10